Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT) Technical Session 5

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sherri M. Youssef, The Ohio State University; Amanda Singer Nault, The Ohio State University; Carter James Huber, The Ohio State University; Rachel Louis Kajfez, The Ohio State University; Krista M Kecskemety, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)

Curiosity indirect assessment that uses Kashdan etal.’s [27] 5-Dimensional Curiosity Scale were developed by a previous team of OSU researchers[21].The Curiosity indirect assessment applies Kashdan et al.’s [27] Five-Dimensional Curiosity Scale(5DC) which has been validated and previously used within an engineering education context[27]. The five dimensions or constructs of Curiosity in this scale are Joyous Exploration (JE - theelements of curiosity that spark joy,) Deprivation Sensitivity (DS – curiosity that causes tension),Stress Tolerance (ST – curiosity that associated with the unknown), Social Curiosity (SC –curiosity with interpersonal interactions), and Thrill Seeking (TS – risky behaviors or situationsone partakes in due to curiosity with

Conference Session

Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 2: Veteran Identity & Inclusion

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rebecca C. Atkinson, Clemson University; Catherine Mobley, Clemson University; Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants; Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego; Michelle M. Camacho, University of San Diego; Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Military and Veterans

for the National Center for Women in Information Tech- nology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engineering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, statewide pre-college math initiatives, teacher and faculty professional development programs, and S-STEM pro- grams.Dr. Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University and the M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University. She is

Conference Session

The Best of Design in Engineering

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristin L. Wood, University of Texas, Austin; Rajesh Elara Mohan, Singapore University of Technology and Design; Sawako Kaijima, Singapore University of Technology and Design; Stylianos Dritsas, Singapore University of Technology and Design; Daniel D. Frey, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Christina Kay White, University of Texas, Austin; Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy; Richard H. Crawford, University of Texas, Austin; Diana Moreno, Singapore University of Technology and Design; Kin-Leong Pey, Singapore University of Technology and Design

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

pedagogical modelsuggests that students do not flourish intellectually in classes that simply require them to remember andrepeat information. Instead, students benefit most from moving through a cycle that advances them froma stage of merely acquiring information to more advanced stages in which they learn to analyzeinformation and ultimately to synthesize information and apply what they’ve learned in differentsituations. Bloom’s revised taxonomy, as implemented through Bransford et al.’s model and others, maybe utilized as an integral foundation of advancements in innovation content throughout curriculumdevelopment.Five Factor Model (Big Five Personality Dimensions). “Personality is that pattern of characteristicthoughts, feelings, and behaviors

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division (SWED) Technical Session #2

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ben Arie Tanay, Purdue Engineering Education; Lexy Chiwete Arinze, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Siddhant Sanjay Joshi, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Kirsten A. Davis, Purdue University, West Lafayette; James C Davis, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division (SWED)

[by using Copilot] as I would [have by] writing every line. […] I typed the comment and then in five seconds I have 10 lines of function versus that's going to take me two minutes to write 10 lines of function.” [Par. 3]Par. 3’s comment is representative of a general sentiment among students that that they solvedproblems faster when they included LLMs into their workflow.3. Knowledge retention concernsEight students acknowledged that they were unsure if their LLM usage contributed to a lack ofknowledge retention. Throughout the interviews, students revealed that at times they interactedwith LLM solely with the intention of retrieving a solution to implement into their projectwithout genuinely learning the content. For example, one student

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 27

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fanyi Zhang, Purdue University; Beth M. Holloway, Purdue University ; Eric Holloway, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division 3 - Engagement in Practice Lightning Round: Fostering Reciprocal Partnerships and Empowering Change

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel B. Oerther, Missouri University of Science and Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division (COMMENG)

frameworkto use when promoting community-engagement among engineering students asdemonstrated through a specific case-study of raising awareness of antibiotic resistance.Future efforts should include “scaling-up” this approach to include additional instructorsas well as “expanding” this approach to explore additional subject matter such as thefood-energy-water nexus, zero waste, and climate resilience among other topics forenvironmental health literacy.References 1. R. Aminov, R”A brief history of the antibiotic era: Lessons learned and challenges for the future,” Front. Microbiol., vol. 1, no. 134, 2010. [Online] Available: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2010.00134. 2. S. Oerther and D.B. Oerther, “Antimicrobial resistance

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Technical Session 6: Engineering in the Home

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelli Paul, Indiana University-Bloomington; Lauren Penney, Indiana University-Bloomington; Adam Maltese, Indiana University-Bloomington; Amber Simpson, State University of New York at Binghamton; Jungsun Kim, Indiana University-Bloomington

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

focuses on how students can consistently develop their talent throughout their educational experiences and how parents, school, and community support students, s ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Caregivers’ Roles in Supporting Children’s Engagement in Engineering Activities at Home (Fundamental)AbstractWe began this project with three goals: (1) engage families in engineering activities, (2) increasethe awareness of kids and caregivers as to what engineering is, and (3) increase children’ interestin engineering. We focused on caregivers and home environments because of the important rolethat at-home experiences with STEM play in triggering interest for many

Conference Session

Student Mental Health and Communities of Care

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katherine Robert, University of Denver; Jon A. Leydens, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

Conference Session

College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Martha Cervantes, Johns Hopkins University ; Sydney Danielle Floryanzia, University of Washington and Johns Hopkins University; Jackie Sharp; William Roberts Gray-Roncal; Erik C. Johnson, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP)

. 45–52, 2018. [2] M. Villafa˜ne-Delgado, E. C. Johnson, M. Hughes, M. Cervantes, and W. Gray-Roncal, “STEM leadership and training for trailblazing students in an immersive research environment,” in 2020 IEEE Integrated STEM Educa- tion Conference (ISEC), pp. 1–4, 2020. [3] S. E. Page et al., “Prologue to the difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies,” Introductory Chapters, 2007. [4] M. Estrada, G. R. Young, J. Nagy, E. J. Goldstein, A. Ben-Zeev, L. M´arquez-Maga˜na, and A. Eroy-Reveles, “The influence of microaffirmations on undergraduate persistence in science career pathways,” CBE

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Technical Session 1: Sense of Self in Biomedical Engineering Students

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Jill Lunn, Florida International University; Cristi L. Bell-Huff, Georgia Institute of Technology; Joseph M. LeDoux, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Technical Session 2: Let's Get Thinking Computationally

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine M. Cunningham, Pennsylvania State University; Darshita N. Shah, The Pennsylvania State University; Ashwin Krishnan Mohan, Pennsylvania State University; Gregory John Kelly, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

-8Arık, M., & Topçu, M. S. (2022). Computational thinking integration into science classrooms: Example of digestive system. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09934-zBarr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community?. ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48– 54.Bartholomew, S. R., Zhang, L., & Weitlauf, J. (2018). Engineering design and coding through quadcopters. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 78(1), 14–21.Bartholomew, S. R., & Zhang, L. (2019). Socially relevant contexts. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 79(1), 13–19.Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012, April

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division Technical Session 4- COVID and Virtual Learning

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessie Marshall Zarazaga, Southern Methodist University; Janille Smith-Colin, Southern Methodist University; Cindy Hua

inaccessibility are expected if virtual community-based site analysis persists, flexibility in changewill remain an integral engineering tool in community-site engagement processes.References[1] J. Kabo and C. Baillie, “Seeing through the Lens of Social Justice: A Threshold for Engineering.,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 317–325, Aug. 2009.[2] J. Dewey, Experience and education. New York: Macmillan, 1938.[3] C. L. Dym, “Learning Engineering: Design, Languages, and Experiences*,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 145–148, Apr. 1999.[4] O. Eris, C. L. Dym, A. M. Agogino, D. D. Frey, and L. J. Leifer, “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 103–120, 2005.[5] S. Bell, “Project-Based

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sanaz Motamedi, University of Florida; Mckenzie Landrum, University of Florida; Tara Ippolito, University of Florida; Austin Hayes

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 11: Program Descriptions and Learning Analytics

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura Cruz Castro, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Tiantian Li, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Leyla Ciner; Kerrie Douglas, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Christopher Brinton, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

, 1993, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1993.tb00065.x.[2] E. Jamelske, “Measuring the impact of a university first-year experience program on student GPA and retention,” Higher Education, vol. 57, no. 3, 2009, doi: 10.1007/s10734- 008-9161-1.[3] N. A. Pendergrass et al., “Improving first-year engineering education,” in Journal of Engineering Education, 2001, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 33–41. doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2001.tb00564.x.[4] S. Odeh, S. McKenna, and H. Abu-Mulaweh, “A unified first-year engineering design- based learning course,” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, vol. 45, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0306419016674508.[5] S. A. Ambrose and C. H. Amon, “Systematic design of a first

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 11 Empathy and Human-Centered Design 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hoda Ehsan, The Hill School; Monica Cardella, Florida International University

conceptual design (when the physical artifact does not exist) where designers runmental simulations of the design works and predict the sources of flaws in the performance [31].However, design-based troubleshooting also happens during or after testing, when designersactively look for patterns of behaviors to discover the flaw and the problematic area(s) [17].Crismond [32] has identified four steps to systematically conduct designed-basedtroubleshooting including observing, diagnosing, explaining and suggesting a remedy. Duringobserving, designers observe the performance of their design. They then diagnose theproblematic area, explain the causes and finally suggest remedy to fix the problematic area.Once a problematic area is identified and the

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 2: Peer Mentoring/Learning, Teaching Assistants, and Career Mentorship

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Darcie Christensen, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Idalis Villanueva, University of Florida

91.5% Person of Color 3.2% Prefer not to answer 0.9% Prefer not to answer 5.8% 1. Participants chose all that applied from: Male, Female, Transgender (i.e., gender identity differs from biological sex assigned at birth), Genderqueer (i.e., do not subscribe to traditional genders), Agender (i.e., identifies as not belonging to any gender), Cisgender (i.e., gender identity matches the biological identity assigned at birth), not listed, or prefer not to answer. 2. The first person in immediate family [e.g., mother, father, sibling(s), grandparent(s)] to attend college 3. Participants chose all that applied from

Conference Session

AERO 1: Rocketry and Space Education

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Irving Buchwald, Clarkson University; Michael C.F. Bazzocchi, Clarkson University

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace Division (AERO)

ground stations are RF ground stations and use either aparabolic dish antenna or a Yagi antenna [1]. Parabolic dish antennas are shaped as concaveshell, while Yagi antennas have small perpendicular rods that run along a long main rod. Thebenefits of parabolic dish antennas are that they are less complex, inexpensive, and highlydirectional [10]. The detriment of parabolic dish antennas is that their size depends heavily ongain and desired frequency [10]. The benefits of a Yagi antenna are that they are highlydirectional and relatively inexpensive [10]. The detriments are that they have low gains if small,and high gains if large, therefore, large bandwidth results in a larger design [10]. Parabolic dishantennas tend to be used in the S-band, while

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelley E Dugan, University of Michigan; Erika Mosyjowski, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James P. Becker, Montana State University, Bozeman; Douglas J. Hacker, University of Utah; Christine Johnson

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

over several semesters in paper format demonstrated thatwhile most students appeared to grasp the underlying intent of the question, it was felt that theintroductory statement would help students who might otherwise miss the point of the exercise’smain question(s). Once the student reads the Introductory Statement and selects a continue button,he/she is presented with the main question(s) of the writing exercise. Figure 2 and Figure 3 containthe Question Statement for writing exercises 1 and 2, respectively. Consider the circuit shown below and assume that the elements are ideal. Explain what happens to the power associated with VS, R1, R2 and R3 as the resistance of R2 decreases while the other component values (VS, R1 and R3) remain

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - Technical Session 6: Mentors & Teams

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rui Li, New York University Tandon School of Engineering; Victoria Bill, New York University Tandon School of Engineering; Ingrid Paredes, New York University Tandon School of Engineering; Jack Bringardner, New York University Tandon School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

] D. Boud and G. I. Feletti, "Changing problem-based learning," in The challenge of problem-based learning: Routledge, 2013, pp. 9-22.[6] J. R. Savery, "Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions," Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 5-15, 2015.[7] S. Cocco, "Student leadership development: The contribution of project-based learning," Unpublished Master’s thesis. Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC, 2006.[8] P. A. Kirschner, J. Sweller, and R. E. Clark, "Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division - Mechanics Applied and the Best in Five... Get Ready!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Kaklamanos, Merrimack College; Simon Ghanat, The Citadel; Craig Shillaber, Northeastern University; Tanya Kunberger, Florida Gulf Coast University; Brock Barry, United States Military Academy; Shawn Griffiths, University of Wyoming; Corrie Walton-Macaulay, Saint Martin's University; Suresh Immanuel, University of Evansville; David Saftner, University of Minnesota Duluth; Chris Swan, Tufts University

educators of common pitfalls and better approaches forMohr’s circle instruction. However, most of the literature is focused on either mechanics orstructural engineering courses, with little or no references concerning the education of Mohr’scircle in geotechnical engineering courses. While the concept of Mohr’s circle is notfundamentally different in geotechnical applications when compared to structural or mechanicsapplications, it still presents challenges for many learners throughout their undergraduateeducation. These challenges include the differences in sign conventions for geotechnicalapplications, the continued complexity of the topic, and that the students have not mastered theconcept from the previous course(s).A phenomenographic analysis

Conference Session

Social Justice: Pedagogy, Curricular Reform, and Activism

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Rachel Koh, Smith College; Jenn Stroud Rossmann, Lafayette College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

] analyzed the “low-choice culture” of engineering curricula, particularly incontrast to other fields of study. In the context of new research demonstrating the value of selfdetermination or autonomy for students in motivating learning, enhancing self-efficacy, andsupporting persistence, the relative inflexibility of engineering curricula stood out starkly. Withinindividual courses, studies have shown the “power of choice” to positively influence studentoutcomes, for example, when students may choose from among a menu of design projects[45, 46], and recommendations have been made for the design of self-determination supportiveengineering-student learning experiences [47, 48]. However, Forbes, et al.,’s statistical analysis ofthe curricula at 46

Conference Session

Using Technology to Support Learning in Mechanics

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Yonghee Lee, Purdue University at West Lafayette ; Jennifer Deboer, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Jeffrey F. Rhoads, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Edward J. Berger, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

students’diverse needs and preferences [29]. To this end, future research will apply the abbreviatedDynamics Concept Inventory (aDCI) [30] to examine an instructor’s effect on student academicperformance in the specific context of Prime University.AcknowledgementThis study is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under GrantNo. 1525671. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. This workwas conducted with oversight provided by the Purdue University (West Lafayette) InstitutionalReview Board.References[1] M. Stains, J. Harshman, M. K. Barker, S. V. Chasteen, R. Cole, S. DeChenne-Peters, et al., “Anatomy

Conference Session

Empathy and Human-centered Design 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Laura R. Murphy, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Thanina Makhlouf, University of Michigan; Eytan Adar; Sophia Brueckner, University of Michigan; Colleen M. Seifert, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Engineering Design, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 437–448, Oct. 2009.[7] E. B.-N. Sanders and P. J. Stappers, “Co-creation and the new landscapes of design,” CoDesign, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5–18, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1080/15710880701875068.[8] A. Khurana and S. R. Rosenthal, “Towards Holistic ‘Front Ends’ In New Product Development,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 57–74, Jan. 1998, doi: 10.1111/1540-5885.1510057.[9] N. Cross, Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design, 4th ed. West Sussex, England: Wiley, 2008.[10] S. R. Daly, C. M. Seifert, S. Yilmaz, and R. Gonzalez, “Comparing Ideation Techniques for Beginning Designers,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 138, no. 10, pp. 101108- 101108–12, Aug

Conference Session

Studies of Shifting In-person Courses to Online and Students' Online Behavior

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Bradley J. Sottile, Pennsylvania State University; Laura E. Cruz, Pennsylvania State University; Yi-An Lo Burleson, Pennsylvania State University; Kris McLain, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, as their normal patterns of activities, such as sleep, exercise,and studying, have been disrupted. The present study seeks to gather direct evidence of howstudents are allocating their time (e.g. what activities and for what duration), in an effort to bothinform human-centered course design and to optimize student learning and well-being under theconditions of remote/multi-modal learning and beyond.Literature Review Until relatively recently, there has been little scholarly interest in how students spendtheir time outside of class. This began changing in the late 1990’s and early 2000’s when ahandful of large-scale studies indicated that student spend far less time on learning activities,such as reading or studying, than had been

Conference Session

Medley of Undergraduate Programming and Pedagogies

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Yue Liu, Arizona State University; Dina Verdin, Arizona State University; Gerhard Sonnert, Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

1.708Sibling(s) encouraged me toward STEM career .023 .633STEM is involved in father’s career .034 .750Female students who reported being interested in an engineering career at the beginning of highschool had higher odds of choosing engineering as a career at the end of high school (OR =9.500; Table 4). It was noticeable that interest in engineering in middle school no longerincreased female students’ odds of choosing engineering as a career at the end of high school. Itcould be inferred that female students’ engineering career interest in middle school only affectedtheir interest at the beginning, not the end of high school, as students might have the option totake more

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: First-Year Experiences

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jill Davishahl, Western Washington University; Jeffrey L. Newcomer, Western Washington University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

point, it is essential tointegrate this content into both curricular and co-curricular efforts. It is not enough to spend asingle hour engaged in this work. It is important to find ways to encourage students to explorethese topics in more depth and to allow them to continue to engage in meaningful discussions asthey develop their personal and professional identities.References[1] B. O. Barefoot, C. L. Warnock, M. P. Dickinson, S. E. Richardson and M. R. Roberts, "Exploring the Evidence: Reporting Outcomes of First-Year Seminars. The First-Year Experience. Volume II. Monograph Series, Number 25.," National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, 1998.[2] C. Boudreau and J. Kromrey, "A longitudinal

Conference Session

TELPhE Division Technical Session 2: The Broadening Face of Engineering Education

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Corey T. Schimpf, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York (CoE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

qualitative approach for examining language mediated frames that highlight someaspects of social reality while obscuring other aspects [52]. These frames or discourses may bespoken or communicated through “texts”, including the multimodal texts like videogames [11],[53]. To identify any discourses in Iconoclasts, the author analyzed the recorded dialogue fromthe game and associated notes on the story or storytelling from the research journal. Particularattention was given to engineering and technology topics and what was being included or excludedabout the topic, what assumptions the discourse(s) carried and which characters were invoking thediscourse(s). Previous engineering education research was reviewed to help connect the discoursesin

Conference Session

Changing How We Pursue Change

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Madeleine Jennings, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education, Equity

myunderstanding of patterns within the queer experiences in STEM.ValidityUsing Walther et al.’s [31] framework for achieving validity in engineering educationqualitative research, I present multiple means with which validation was achieved throughoutthis project. By being a member of the GRSM community myself, this study possessessome aspect of communicative validity [32]. This presents me with the ability to filter myparticipants’ stories through my own experiences and knowledge about the community,positioning me as an individual with enough experience and community-specific knowledge toconduct research with this community. I also was forced to navigate challenges within the STEMinstitution as a direct result of my identities as queer and disabled, thus

Conference Session

Laboratory Courses and Programming in the Aerospace Curriculum

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Waterloo Tsutsui, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Ruben D. Lopez-Parra, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Genisson Silva Coutinho, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia da Bahia; Alberto W. Mello, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Michael David Sangid, Purdue University; Tamara J. Moore, Purdue University at West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

theoretical data.In addition to enduring outcomes (Table 2) and the important-to-know topics (Table 3), the labactivities also promote “good-to-be-familiar with” topics as follows: Students are expected tolearn and demonstrate the following topics throughout all six labs: Teamwork, report writing,and communication. If we, for instance, take modeling as an example, being able to modelconstitutes an important and direct predictor of conceptual understanding of often-complicatedengineering topics, such as heat transfer [42]. To sum up on these “good-to-be-familiar with”topics, they are covered in all labs (Labs #1–#6) and will become a part of necessary skills as apracticing engineer in the future no matter what field of engineering s/he choose to