) situated within the transfer transition, and one (Trying to Fit the Full-time Profile)situated at UMKC.MCC ObstaclesUncertainty about Engineering Major and/or UMKC referred to the reality that MCC studentswere often unsure of which major to select. Even if they selected engineering as a major, theysometimes struggled to select an engineering specialty. As study participants described: [A barrier is] the length of time that people can be spinning in the washing machine without deciding exactly what they want to do, without completing all the prerequisite coursework to get into a particular major … If you do a transfer major, you are basically taking general education classes, which both means that you can change your mind
Paper ID #32705Measuring Connections: Novel Methods and FindingsDr. Elise Barrella P.E., DfX Consulting LLC Dr. Elise Barrella is the founder and CEO of DfX Consulting LLC which offers engineering education and design research, planning and consulting services. She is a registered Professional Engineer and was a Founding Faculty member of the Department of Engineering at Wake Forest University. She is passionate about curriculum development, scholarship and student mentoring on transportation systems, sustainabil- ity, and engineering design. Dr. Barrella completed her Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Georgia Tech where
(Pascarella& Terenzini, 1991), the influences of these experiences among engineering students is as yetlittle understood. The absence of such information presents colleges and schools ofengineering with major problems. Industry and the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) are bringing increasing pressure on engineering schools to producegraduates who are prepared to engage in unstructured problem solving and to work in groups.ABET is also moving to an assessment-based reaccreditation review process, requiringinstitutions to produce evidence that their programs “prepare graduates for the practice ofengineering at a professional level” (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology,1997, p. 41).This paper reports the
Paper ID #37167Changing the Way We Educate to Prioritize Minority Students’ MentalHealth and Enhance Their Well-Being ¨Ms. Claudia Calle Muller, Florida International University Claudia Calle M¨uller is a Ph.D. student in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Florida International University (FIU). She holds a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica del Per´u (PUCP). Claudia has 4+ years’ experience in structural engineering designing reinforced concrete resi- dential and commercial buildings in Peru; 2+ years’ experience in entrepreneurship building a successful health coaching
Session 1392 Women’s Manufacturing Workshop Series that Supports Inclusiveness and Skill Building in Undergraduate Engineering Education Beverly Louie, Daniel W. Knight and Jacquelyn F. Sullivan Women in Engineering Program/Integrated Teaching and Learning Laboratory and Program College of Engineering and Applied Science University of Colorado at BoulderAbstractDuring the past six years, pre-semester assessments of student skills have revealed a lack of hands-on experience by women students in the First
understand and assess engineering students’ motivation entrepreneurially minded learning. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Validating the Use of Epistemic Network Analysis to Describe the Nature of Learning in Practice-Based Learning SettingsIntroductionPreparing engineering students to thrive in the workplace post-graduation has been a longwithstanding challenge and discussion topic in engineering education spaces. To provide studentswith authentic engineering experiences, there have been shifts in engineering educationcurricular approaches, such as problem-based, case-based, and project-based approaches – whichhave had various success rates at increasing transfer, learning, and
including an“array of ideas” into the work that she does, to be undermined by the competitive, individualisticnature of the curriculum. Towards the end of her sophomore year, she described her experiencesin her pre-engineering classes: “It just seemed like there was just a different frame of mind and the whole ‘me succeeding,’ like ‘me, me, me,’ and really not wanting to help people, and I didn’t understand that, because I really, if I know something, I’m gonna help you figure it out, and I would hope that if I didn’t know something, it would be the same way.”Asked where this different frame of mind comes from, Bryn said
student retention.IntroductionNorthern Arizona University has been exploring methods by which to recruit and retainengineering students into their undergraduate program. Two of the Mechnaical Engineeringfaculty have recently been engaged in modifying a freshman CAD class with these motivationsin mind. They are implementing “Rapid Prototyping” (RP) into the ME 180 Freshman CADclass. This paper will document the work in progress on this effort to date.RP is the process which converts a CAD model into an artifact or product.1 This process hasbeen used increasingly over the past two decades in engineering firms to produce first-articledesigns. Advantages of using RP machines over using tradition fabrication methods includereduced scrap, less skilled
might ultimately estrange any of us whomaintain only a linear mind-set.Accordingly, I should like to concentrate in this paper especially on the value ofhistorical understanding, arrived at through humanities education, for engineeringstudents. My main thesis is that because the Western world, not to mention much ofthe rest of the world, has become or is becoming postmodern in character, it poses areal challenge for engineering graduates. And because postmodernism is least of allamenable to the traditional Western consciousness, all linearity and problem-solving incharacter, with its reliance on systematic thought, our being able, as educators, toapproach the world in its non-linearity and resistance to rational systems is to provide awholistic
Entrepreneurship and Design Faculty.” Journal of Engineering Entreprenuership. 4(1). 20133. Atman, C.J., Kilgore, D., and McKenna, A. “Characterizing design learning: A mixed- methods study of engineering designers’ use of language.” Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3): 309-326. 2008.X. Appendices Appendix A An overview of the 2014 DeFINE Program can be viewed at this video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvtsjW23k6c. Appendix B An example Mindmeister Mind-Map documenting the 4 P’s tool utilized during the Summer 2014 DeFINE Program can be seen below: Page 26.1514.14Figure B-1: A fully expanded view of an example
to 1996Union’s engineering curricula were not set up with terms abroad in mind. Since theprograms are relatively small, most required and elective courses in the major are onlyoffered once a year. Therefore, it took very careful planning and advisement to allowstudents to go abroad without seriously jeopardizing their chances of finishing in fouryears. Union also bucks the national trend in that most of our students actually graduatein four years.Students who were successful in juggling their schedules invariably came back from theirforeign study saying it was well worth the effort, and many said that it was a lifechanging experience. However, it took the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) Engineering Criteria 2000
3was able to capture it in a notebook entry. I phrase this proposition as duality to suggest that there are two pointsabout human thinking. First, as argued above, thinking involves the process ofusing representations to convert sensations into reliableknowledge—representing is knowing. However, once we have createdrepresentations out of the sensations, we able to continue thinking by changingand altering the representations in our mind. We are able to take action in theworld because we can use knowledge to represent the world in a variety ofways—knowing is representing. This proposition applies obviously to engineering. For the most part,engineers do not wrestle directly with the forces of Nature (Unli ke Superman,they do not
Minority Participation:4. Hall, C., Dickerson, J., Batts, D., Kauffmann, P., & Bosse, M. (2011). Are we missing opportunities to encourage interest in STEM fields? Journal of Technology Education, 23(1), 32–46.5. Yildiz, F. 2013. Attracting Young Minds to Engineering Technology Fields with Mobile Renewable Energy Education”, Proceedings of the ASEE Fall 2013 Middle Atlantic Section Conference, University of District Colombia, October 11-12, 2013, Washington, DC.
An Ethical Puzzle for University Administrators Craig W. Somerton Michigan State UniversityAbstractIt has long been recognized that ethical behavior is an essential element of an engineer.Considerable attention has been given to ethics in engineering education. Some programsinclude a full course in ethics, while others integrate ethical issues throughout their curriculum;but all programs need to create a culture where ethical behavior is prized and unethical behavioris not accepted. This culture must be grounded in the behavior of the faculty and administrators.With rampant student cheating and plagiarism, the faculty and administration must set
intended.ConclusionEngineers need to be sensitive to the aesthetic aspects of their work. This is necessary for thepublic appreciation of the work done. Engineering lab reports provide one opportunity to givestudents feedback on aesthetics. Furthermore, modern word processors have raised the barfor what is considered acceptable. In response, engineering educators should sensitizestudents to the basics of typography and aspects of it that are unique to SMET writing. Figure 1. Typefaces are allusive. What does each typeface remind you of?Citations[1] J.H. Kok, Patterns of the Western Mind, Sioux Center, IA: Dordt College Press, 1998, p. 209.[2] Public Broadcasting System, Building Big, “Bridges,” TV broadcast October 2000.[3] C. Seerveld, Rainbows for the
: Broadening Participation Conceptual FrameworkEstablishing a clear conceptualization as it relates to participating in engineering across pathways(Figure 1) was important because the differences discussed above speak to different kinds ofgoals and, by extension, call for different kinds of data needed to monitor progress. It is withthese differences in mind that we both searched for and analyzed the available data. Research DesignTo establish a cursory understanding of the data landscape as it relates to broadeningparticipation, we leveraged a rapid review approach. A rapid review is a methodology that entailssystematic review methods for collecting and appraising information (e.g., databases or reports),yet is
Paper ID #33440Assessing and Communicating Professional Competency Development ThroughExperiential LearningDr. John H. Callewaert, University of Michigan John Callewaert is Director of Strategic Projects in the Office of the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Education, College of Engineering, University of Michigan. He previously served as a program director with the University of Michigan’s Graham Sustainability Institute, Director of the University of Michigan- Flint’s Office of Research, and the Director of the Institute for Community and Environment at Colby- Sawyer College. He completed doctoral study in Resource
. 9ReferencesBegel A., Garcia D. and Wolfman S., "Kinesthetic Learning in the Classroom", ACM SIGCSEBulletin, v. 36, n. 1, March 2004.Dave, R. H., Developing and Writing Behavioral Objectives. Educational Innovators Press. 1975.Dunn, R. S. and Dunn, K. J., Teaching Secondary Students Through Their Individual LearningStyles. Prentice Hall. 1978.Felder, R. M. and Silverman, L. K., “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education”,Engineering Education 78:7 674-681. 1988.Felder R. M. and Soloman, B. A., “Index of Learning Styles”, http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/ILSpage.html , accessed 01/17/08Feldman J. and McPhee, D., The Science of Learning and the Art of Teaching. CENGAGEDelmar Learning. 2007Gardner, H., Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple
, American Society for Engineering Education” Session 1408 I think the Omega story—you really don’t think about it but it puts you in a state of mind that you really don’t know about and every decision and everything from there on goes back to that certain state of mind. I mean you honestly don’t comprehend it while you are doing it but you are—like—well Omega is like this and this. I don’t know--it’s kind of like playing a role, if you say you go home with your parents you act completely different than you do when you are with your friends. It’s like you walk into a different environment and your mind
creating the technical literacy. We view increasing technical literacy as more than an opportunity. We, too, feel a sense ofurgency.Bibliography1 K. Eric Drexler, Engines of Creation: The Coming Age of Nanotechnology, 19862 See http://www.union.edu/CT 3 George Bugliarello, “A new Trivium and Quadrivium,” Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 2003. 4 Traditional liberal learning is generally recognized to include the arts, humanities and the sciences. In the minds of many today there is little difference between the terms “science” and “technology,” with technology often being viewed simply as applied science. However, historically these terms have very different meanings. The meaning of the word “science” comes from the
Page 18.8.52015-ASEE-K12-Proposal-Form_EPICS_HCD_submit.docx Page 4 of 8 WORKSHOP PROPOSAL FORM 2015 Annual ASEE K-12 Workshop on Engineering Education “Authentic Engineering: Representing & Emphasizing the E in STEM” Presented by Dassault Systems Saturday, June 13, 2015 8:00 A.M. – 5:00 P.M. Sheraton Seattle | Seattle | WAAuthentic Engineering Connection- Identify and describe how you will explicitly address theways in which your lesson or activity is representative of the processes, habits of mind andpractices used by
describe the expected assessments.Research QuestionsIn the 2015-2016 academic year, engineering faculty at the University identified a need to helpstudents prepare for their first engineering courses as sophomores. The ideal solution wouldprovide course preparation by reinforcing background information and introduce topics to becovered in the first few weeks of the fall semester. In addition, the preparation was intended tobe voluntary and accessible to any student who chose to participate. The material is offered at noadditional cost to the students. Students also do not receive academic credit. With this in mind,we identified the summer as an ideal preparation time for students, much like the summer bridgeprograms that exist at many universities
the high degree of connectivity between materials and the processes that create andshape them into the products we used in every-day life. This grounding in real world applicationscan be used to show the value of materials science to those experiencing it for the first time,assisting educators in increasing the field’s interest. The records and associated properties werechosen with a high school audience in mind; all are common in everyday life so personalconnections can be readily made. This commonality could make this tool useful for a basicintroductory engineering course as well, particularly a broad discipline overview or freshmancornerstone course. Figures 3 and 4 showcase mockup material and product database images,while Table 1
5 mind the problem-solving skills necessary to tackle the many challenges of the profession.”Currently Captain Funkhouser is stationed at Bamberg, Germany. He serves as logistics officerfor the 82nd Engineer Battalion and recently passed his Professional Engineer Exam.Summary Overall the program has been a great success, experiencing only minimal problems overthe first two years. One such problem was the limitation on the numbers of credit hours agraduate student can be enrolled in at one time. The total load for a graduate student is limited to15 hours. To accommodate this limitation, the CE/EnvE 380 Water Resources course wasmoved to a special session before the beginning of classes in August. The benefits to the
Session 2548 The Need to Establish An Affective Domain Assessment Strategy for Your Program Willard D. Bostwick Indiana University Purdue University IndianapolisAbstract Several proposed ABET engineering technology criteria have roots in the affective aswell as cognitive domain. If these outcomes are assessed wholly as mental activities, measureswill be sought which determine the student’s ability to recall, comprehend, apply, synthesize,and evaluate appropriate skills. It is possible to do all of these things without demonstrating thata graduate will
great deal ofemphasis on the research productivity of the engineering faculty, in addition to their instructionaleffectiveness. Therefore, we were charged with helping the NEEs become effective instructorswithout overly distracting them from building their fledging research programs. This papershould be read with this background in mind.2 Effective new engineering educators Educators should judge their performance by “what is learned” rather than by “what is taught”.In [1], the author studied a collection of “quick-starting” or exemplary new faculty members (notexclusively NEEs). Boice defined “quick-starting “ faculty as being “on track” toward tenureand promotion in both instructional and research duties. Boice found that quick
Session 3425 Building a Process for Establishing an Interdisciplinary Design and Manufacturing Freshman Course Lucy Siu-Bik King, Ph.D., William Riffe, Ph.D., B. Lee Tuttle, Ph.D., Henry Kowalski, Ph.D., Brenda Lemke, M.S., Jacqueline El-Sayed, Ph.D., Douglas Melton, Ph.D., Laura Rust, Ph.D., Mark Thompson, Ph.D. Kettering University, 1700 West Third Ave, Flint, MI 48504-4898 (810) 762-9500AbstractCollege freshmen, though they may be registered in the engineering programs, do not alwaysknow what discipline best suits their
Solving in Engineering” at Florida Atlantic University. The relatedteaching material may be extended or shrunk, thus allowing flexibility for incorporating it indifferent classes such as design, introduction to engineering, and problem solving.The material includes: a) course material for specific eight problem solving strategies, and b)hands-on activities that include more than 250 different 3-D mechanical puzzles, many games,mind teasers, LEGO® Mindstorms competitions, and design projects, each of which illustratesprinciples and strategies in inventive problem solving. In addition, students use patent-relatedsoftware packages and websites. These activities allow for self-paced, semi-guided explorationthat improves self-esteem and encourages
an asset-based perspective to recognize knowledge that is often ignored [13], [14].This framework has largely supported primary and secondary educators’ efforts to create culturallyrelevant pedagogical practices by leveraging students’ lived experiences (see [15]–[17]. Forexample, the work of Mejia and Wilson-Lopez [18] captured how Latino/a adolescents leveragedtheir engineering-related funds of knowledge to create a solution in a design project or in problemsfaced in their everyday lives. Their study found that high school students’ funds of knowledge canbe relevant to engineering bodies of knowledge, skills, and habits of mind such as systemsthinking, scientific or mathematical knowledge, production and processing [19], [20]. The
A WORK-IN-PROGRESS: We ARe…DUINO! a project-based first-year experience, collaborative with the IEEE student chapterIn this work-in-progress (WIP) paper, we will invite discussion about our recent and ongoingefforts in developing a first-year experience for Electrical Engineering (EE). A common desireof undergraduates in EE (and we suspect across engineering in general) is for more “hands-on”experiences. What little they get tends to be later in their college career; however, as the Do-It-Yourself (DIY)/Make culture continues to grow, more of our students are walking in the doorready and willing to “get their hands dirty” on