well established. However, through their experience in the verticalintegration of lower-level Mechanical Engineering students into a senior Capstone designproject at the Virginia Military Institute, the authors have found that such verticalintegration yields significant educational and practical benefits, both to senior- and lower-level engineering students, beyond those realized from the traditional Capstone projectstructure.For senior students, those benefits include additional and frequent occasions by which tohone their written and oral communication skills, increased emphasis and reliance ontheir project management and leadership skills, and the opportunity to clarify and focustheir design concepts through their interaction with lower
LaboratoryIntroductionTraditional undergraduate communications courses have focused on analog transmissionschemes such as amplitude (AM) and frequency modulation (FM). Given the comparativelysimple design of analog modulation circuitry, offering a laboratory component to the course isstraightforward. In a typical laboratory session, students could construct and investigate theperformance of AM or FM transmitters or receivers.With the emergence of technology such as digital cellular telephony and wireline and wirelessdata communications, the emphasis has shifted from analog to digital modulation. Because ofthis shift, digital communications has become an important component to all levels ofcommunications instruction. Due to the complexity of equipment that can emulate
for BOK fulfillment. “BABET” refers to an ABET/EAC accredited baccalaureate degree in civil engineering. “M/30” refers to a master’s degree or approximately 30 semester credits of acceptable graduate-level (or upper-level undergraduate) courses in a technical or professional practice area related to civil engineering. “E” refers to engineering experience. For this path, the accreditation process provides validation of the baccalaureate component of the BOK. Validation of the “M/30” program will be provided by an approved outside entity, which might also be ABET. • B + MABET & E – This secondary path is currently being explored by ASCE for fulfilling the Civil Engineering Body of
767: From concept to Production (A) and (B)”, Harvard Business School Case 9-688-040 and 9-688-041“Columbia's Final Mission”, Harvard Business School Case 9-305-032“Transformation at Ford”. Harvard Business School Case 9-390-083“Final Voyage of the Challenger” Harvard Business School Case 9-671-037“GM Powertrain”, Harvard Business School Case 9-698-008“Adam Aircraft”, Harvard Business School Case BAD010“Xerox and Fuji Xerox”, Harvard Business School Case 9-391-156“Toyota Motor Manufacturing, U.S.A., Inc.”, Harvard Business School Case 9-693-019“Goodyear: The Aquatred Launch”, Harvard Business School Case 9-500-039“Competitive Information Policy at Pratt & Whitney”, Harvard Business School Case 9-394-154“Turner Construction Company
allowsfaculty to quickly identify concept areas where students possess misconceptions, and whatspecific misconceptions they are carrying with them to the course. An identical post-report wasprovided to faculty members during winter break, before the start of spring semester. Page 11.1186.8 Figure 2: Example Pre-CI Report Displaying Test Statistics and a Single Item/Problem Analysis. The correct answer was ‘B’ for this question.It should be noted that the post-course CI results serve as an opportunity for notifying faculty ofspecific content areas that may need strengthening in future classes. Additionally, facultyinstructing
Page 11.1209.5the entire enterprise. Business managers, on the other hand, are concerned with their roles in thecorporation and with their status within that corporation. These differences in pressure points canbe discussed and emphasized in ethical studies for entrepreneurs.One way to more specifically teach ethics with a view to entrepreneurs’ pressures and concernsis through the use of cases. In our case “WWP: Crossing the Line to Entrepreneurship” (SeeAttachment B), we portray an engineer entering the world of entrepreneurship. For the first time,he finds himself with no higher level management to consult on writing a proposal or even onhow he advertises his services. His major concerns revolve around financial matters. He is lessconcerned
://www.udayton.edu/~service/, The University of Dayton, Accessed January 12th , 200614 “The Center for Social Concern,” http://www.udayton.edu/~csc/, The University of Dayton, Accessed January 12th , 200615 B. Hawley, J. Huart, G. Prom, and C. Vehar, “ETHOS: Engineers in Technical, Humanitarian Opportunities of Service-learning”, University of Dayton, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, MEE423L Final Report, 200116 B. Hazeltine and C. Bull, Field Guide to Appropriate Technology, 200317 B. Hazeltine and C. Bull, Appropriate Technology: Tools, Choices and Implications, November 198818 E.F. Schumacher, Small Is Beautiful, 197319 A. Pérez-Foguet, S. Oliete-Josa, and A. Saz-Carranza , “Development education and
activity; we would haveno way to enforce this, but so far no student has opted to use the alternative data.)Table 5. Measurement of body weight using two different scales.Scale Instrument Mean Mass (lb) Standard SDOM (lb) Uncertainty (lb) Deviation (lb)Scale A 2 oz 149.5 0.07 0.04Scale B 2 oz 153.7 0.07 0.04After noting the least count of each scale (4 oz.) and estimating the instrument limit of error (+/-2 oz.), students make ten successive weight measurements on each scale. They calculate themean, standard deviation, and standard deviation of the mean of each data set as shown in Table5
. “Employers Demand New Skills”, Machine Design, Sept 199210 Knight,C.V., McDonald,G.H., “Modernization of a Mechanical Engineering Laboratory using Data Acquisition with LABVIEW”, ASEE Session 226611 Onaral,B., “A Road Less Traveled”, ASEE Prism, September 199212 Wankat,P., Oreovicz,F., “Learning Outside the Classroom”, ASEE Prism, p32, Jan 200013 McConnaughay,K., Welsford,I., Stabenau,E., “Inquiry, Investigation, and Integration in Undergraduate Science Curricula”, Council on Undergraduate Research Quartley, pp14-18, September 199914 Course Webpage for Mechanical Engineering Laboratory I – 22.302 http://faculty.uml.edu/pavitabile/22.302/web_download/Mech_lab_PDF_downloads.htm15 Specific Course Webpage Tags to PDF File and
; Social Action, Free Spirit Publishing. 8. Coyle, E.J., et. al., 1997, EPICS: A Model for Integrating Service-Learning into the Engineering Curriculum, Michigan Journal of Community Service-Learning 4: 81-89. 9. Oaks, William, 2002, Service-Learning in Engineering: A Resource Guidebook, Purdue University. 10. Hanfmann, E., Vakar, G. & Vygotsky, L.S., 1962, Thought and Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 11. Vygotsky, L.S., 1978, Mind in Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 12. Piaget, B., 1999, The Construction of Reality in the Child, International Library of Psychology, Routledge. 13. Bruner, J, 1960, The Process of Education, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 14. Bruner, J. S., 1966
Engineering Systems: 9th International Conference (KES 2005), Proceeding, Part I, volume 3681 of Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, pages 744–750. Springer Verlag, September 2005.9. Gerald Friedland, Lars Knipping, Raúl Rojas, Joachim Schulte, and Christian Zick. Evaluationsergebnisse zum Einsatz des E-Kreide Systems im Wintersemester 2003/2004. Technical Report B-04-06, Fachbereich Mathematik und Informatik, Freie Universität Berlin, June 2004.10. Gerald Friedland, Lars Knipping, Joachim Schulte, and Ernesto Tapia. E-Chalk: A lecture recording system using the chalkboard metaphor. Interactive Technology and Smart Education (ITSE), 1(1):9–20, February 2004.11. Gerald Friedland, Lars Knipping, and Ernesto Tapia. Web based lectures
. Findingsof the study are used to develop a model for teaching preparation and practice at for-profit, non-traditional universities.The third study deals with developing and testing a longitudinal model synthesized fromthe literature to (a) investigate the associations on persistence for nontraditional studentsattending nontraditional institutions, (b) assist staff, faculty, and administratorsimplement high quality intervention strategies, and (c) refocus institutional resourcestoward enhancing student persistence. Data were collected in a three-step process over a5-year period. Results yielded significant differences between students who persisted totheir second year or not and those who graduated or not within 5 years. Further analysesindicated
from gIBIS and QOC. In: Dutoit A, McCall R, Mistrik I, Paech (eds.) Rationale Management in Software Engineering, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 111-132[4] Conklin J, Begeman M.L. (1988) gIBIS: A Hypertext Tool for Exploratory Policy Discussion. ACM Trans. on Office Information Systems, 4(6), pp. 303-331[5] Conklin J (2006) Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems. Wiley, UK, pp. 3- 40[6] Dalrymple O (2005) Using Systems Engineering Methodology to Engineer Community Based Participatory Research, Masters Thesis, Morgan State University, Dept. of Industrial Manufacturing & Information Engineering[7] Dutoit A, McCall R, Mistrik I, Paech B (2006) Rationale Management in
2006-1332: METHODOLOGY AND TOOLS FOR DEVELOPING HANDS-ONACTIVE LEARNING ACTIVITIESJulie Linsey, University of Texas-Austin JULIE LINSEY is a Ph.D. candidate in the Mechanical Engineering Department at The University of Texas at Austin. Her research focus is on systematic methods and tools for innovative and efficient conceptual design with particular focus on design-by-analogy. Contact: julie@linseys.orgBrent Cobb, U.S. Air Force Academy CAPT. BRENT COBB is an instructor of Engineering Mechanics at the U.S. Air Force Academy. He received his B.S. from the Air Force Academy and his M.M.E. degree from Auburn University. He previously worked for the Propulsion Directorate of the Air
choice and 18 true orfalse questions. Seventy percent of the overall grade for the course was based on the test score.The other 30% was based on attendance with 2% taken off for each missed class. Ninety-twopercent of the students passed the course, receiving letter grades of A, B or C. Those that failedthe course had poor attendance. It was obvious that “training” was critical for success. Thegrade distribution is described in Table 2. Letter Grade Percent of Students A 16 B 54 C 12 F 7
Program Interactive 3D Graphics, http://www.alice.org (accessed December2004)3. Curricular Materials for Learning to Program with Alice: Please contact author.4. Cooper, S., Dann, W., & Pausch, R. (2005) Learning to Program with Alice Beta Version. PrenticeHall.5. Hutchinson, A., Moskal, B., Cooper, S., & Dann, W. Formative Assessment: An Illustrative ExampleUsing Alice. 2005 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.6. Gay, L.R. Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application (3rd Ed.). New York:Macmillan Publishing Company, 1987.7. Kehoe, J. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, Writing Multiple-Choice Test Items, 1995,Online:http://www.edresearch.org/scripts/seget2.asp?db=ericft&want=http://www.edresearch.org
10% Peer Evaluations 10% Instructor Evaluation 15% Total 100%Letter Grades are assigned as follows: A > 92 , B >82, C>72, D>62The Fine Print:As you probably know, the Mini Baja senior design project is a popular choice. We currently have 25 students enrolled, but there aremany more who would like to add the course. Unfortunately, our resources will not allow us to add all the students who haverequested this course. Rather than randomly deciding who should get in, additional
, however as an electrical engineer, this was far from the case.”In addition, the participating students cited the following problems: 1. Lack of organization. At Kettering the students are required to organize and manage their own projects. The student’s inexperience often showed, and the learning experience was often painful. At Kettering this general problem is amplified by the two student bodies (A-section and B-section) that must work together to build the vehicle, even though they are not on campus at the same time. Said one alum, “Very poorly organized management and communication between sections made for lots of extra work.” 2. Lack of funding. Simply put there was never nearly enough money to build the vehicle
suggest. The most significant results from this first stageare: a) Engineers spend much of their time coordinating the work of other people over whom they have little formal authority. This includes insiders – people in the same organization – and outsiders in client organizations, suppliers, contractors and community organizations. b) The significance of this coordination has much to do with the need to bring people together with the diverse range of technical knowledge and skills needed to complete engineering project successfully. Much of the working knowledge is unwritten. Written knowledge, where available, is often accessed verbally through individuals familiar with the specific details. c) Advocacy
standardsviii,ix. Table 1: Relationship between ABET Criterion 3 and S-L PedagogyCriterion 3 standards How S-L can meet these(a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, Well-chosen S-L projects provide studentsscience, and engineering with the opportunity to apply these knowledge sets directly to real, potentially ambiguous problems.(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, S-L projects can fit this criterion exactly; foras well as to analyze and interpret data example, students might collect and then analyze data for an
University Heidi Newell is currently the assessment coordinator for the College of Engineering at Rowan University. She previously served as the assessment consultant for the University of North Dakota. She hold a Ph.D. in Educational Leadership from the University of North Dakota, a M.S. in Industrial and Organizational Psychology from Clemson, and a B. A. in Sociology from Bloomsburg University.James Newell, Rowan University Jim Newell is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He has won the Ray Fahien award from ASEE for contributions to engineering education and a Dow Outstanding New Faculty Award. His research interests include high performance polymers, rubric
was no one correct answer thatwould be provided by the teacher. Using a design project where the students knew thetechnology, e.g. how a chair is constructed, allowed focus on the geometric content. Minimaltime was spent on fabrication techniques. While the focus of the unit was geometry, taught in amathematics class, many of the benchmarks of the Standards for Technological Literacy (2000)were met. Page 11.587.12Figure 6 Geometric Chair Design Team AFigure 7 Geometric Chair Design Team B Page 11.587.13 Figure 8 Geometric Chair Design Team CReferencesAppleton, K., & Doig
among students to be successful, the approach must directlyconnect to students’ pre-existing interests and demonstrate the relevance of technology to theirdaily lives and personal aspirations.Bibliography 1. The Two Cultures, C.P. Snow, Cambridge University Press, 1998. 2. Morgenstern, J. “The Fifty-nine-story Crisis”. The New Yorker, May 29, 1995: 45-53. 3. Graham, LR. “Palchinsky’s Travels: a Russian engineer’s adventures among gigantic projects and small minds.” Technology Review, Nov/Dec 1993: 23-31. 4. van der Vink, GE. “Scientifically Illiterate vs. Politically Clueless.” Science, 276: 1175. 5. Kammen DM & Dove MR. “The Virtues of Mundane Science.” Environment, July/Aug 1997: 11-40. 6. Ellis GW, Mikic B
reentrant, turbulent reentrant, transition 0.50 Blasius turbulent model 0.00 0 10 20 30 40 Tank water height (cm)Figure 7. Predicted and measured mass flow rate as a function of water height forreentrant tube entrance. Dashed lines represent uncertainty bounds of model. (a) (b)Figure 8. Photographs of (a) laminar and
: Josey-Bass.22. Tinto, V. (1997). Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational character of student persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 68(6), 599-623.23. Wegerif, R. (1998). The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(1), 34-49.24. Bess, K., Fisher, A., Sonn, C., & Bishop, B. (2002). Psychological sense of community: Theory, research and application. In A.T. Fisher, C.C. Sonn, & B. J. Bishop (Eds.), Psychological sense of community: Research, applications and implications (pp. 3-22). New York: Kluwer Academic.25. Astin, A. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297-308.26
Fellow of the IEEE.Yogesh Gianchandani, University of Michigan Yogesh B. Gianchandani received a B.S., M.S, and after some time in industry, a Ph.D. in electrical engineering, with a focus on microelectronics and MEMS. He is presently an Associate Professor in the EECS Department and holds a joint appointment in the Dept. of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Prior to this he was with the ECE Department at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. He has also held industry positions with Xerox Corporation, Microchip Technology, and other companies, working in the area of integrated circuit design. His research interests include all aspects of design, fabrication, and
. Page 11.904.5Bibliography1. Engineering Self-Study Questionnaire - http://www.abet.org/forms.shtml2. Kunz David. 1997. Understanding Pump Curves. Engineered Systems. Volume 14, pg. 68.3. Roberson, John A., Cassidy, John J., Chaudhry, M. Hanif, Hydraulic Engineering, 2nd edition, 1997, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, pg. 418.4. Mott, Robert L., Applied Fluid Mechanics, 3rd edition, 1990, Macmillan Company, New York, pp. 472-3.5. Albertson, Maurice L., Barton, James R., Simons, Daryl B., Fluid Mechanics For Engineers, 1960, Prentice- Hall Inc., New Jersey, pp. 521-523. For Constant Head - 120 ft 80
, 2p 12/7/2004 3. “Orcad Capture”, http://www.orcad.com/orcadcapture.aspx, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. 2004 4. “Using tt2rom to Synthesize Truth Table in ROM”. http://www.thayer.darmouth.edu/~bpoque/labs/tt2rom.pdf, Spring 2002 5. Ameen, M., Brown, R., Rashik R, Sundaran S., Zeeshan, M. “Programming Read Only Memory with Orcad”, unpublished manual. 6. Cook, N., “Electronics: A Complete Course, 2/E”, Chapter. 27 Semiconductor Memory, Prentice Hall 2004. 7. Kleitz, W., “Digital Electronics with VHDL”, Chpt. 16 Semiconductors, Magnetic, and Optical Memory, Prentice Hall 2005. 8. Manes, S., “The Weird New World of Hardware Fixes”, PC World, Vol. 23 Issue pg 176, 1p, 1c. 9. Schweber, B., “Mems Make a
procedural programming have any advantages over OOP? Page 11.791.727. What are the hazards of using global variables?28. Give a brief example of a db schema that is not normalized.29. Now, normalize the above schema.30. Write an SQL statement that modifies an existing record from the above normalized schema.31. When would it make sense to decrease the degree of normalization?32. What is PLSQL (or PLPGSQL, PLMYSQL …etc.) and when should it be used?33. When combining PHP code with HTML, do you prefer to … a. Insert the PHP code into the HTML via PHP tags b. Output the HTML code from within your PHP
0 1 2 A. Reflection is clear, concise and logical B. Connections between everyday life and ethics were made C. Connections between technical engineering concepts and ethics were made D. Moral imagination is displayed E. Factors that may influence ethical problems are recognized and considered F. Consequences of possible courses of action are weighed G. Student reflects on personal development Page 11.1287.5A clear, concise and logical reflection would be written with excellent grammar, reflect clarity