“Thank you to all for creating, maintaining, and growing such a greatprogram…I am very excited!”. Summer trainings will continue in 2008 and will be opento any schools interesting in implementing an EPICS program.The teachers themselves ranged from retired engineers teaching engineering classes, totechnology education teachers to science teachers. One school brought a team led by ascience teacher and included a technology education, special education and an Englishteacher. They were looking at integrating the engineering-based service-learning into thescience and also the service-learning requirement of the school. Like many schoolsaround the country, they had a service-learning requirement of the students but it was notconnected to science
implemented changes to the delivery of our senior design course. The newframework allows for engaging alumni, guest speakers, field trips, and professional societies in acentralized holistic manner. Details regarding this integrated approach to senior design deliveryare discussed below, along with the findings from surveys we conducted to understand studentperceptions.Delivery Format:The delivery format designed as an academic year long experience was based on theidentification of four major activities as essential to enhance the overall student experience.These include course instruction, technical design content, professional development, andindustry support. The basic framework for an efficient and enhanced delivery of the capstonedesign, shown in
the 3 types of literacy. As will be evident in the discussion of theproject worksheet, the Wooden Shoe Regatta project reflects a balance in the steps ofdesign and also the types of literacy required to complete the tasks assigned. This is whythe project is received with so much enthusiasm. If the rest of the curriculum could besimilarly balanced, one result might be that engineering students might be far moreenthusiastic about their studies.What are the possible consequences of an unbalanced approach – one that favors oneparticular design step, or one particular type of literacy? In his book, Cultural Literacy(1987), Dr. E.D. Hirsch discussed mental schemata or structures as related to literacy andunderstanding. “We know that schemata
-11.19. Touretzky, D.S., et al. Accelerating K-12 computational thinking using scaffolding, staging, and abstraction. in Proceedings of ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 2013. p. 609-614.20. Khanlari, A. and Mansourkiaie, F. Using robotics for STEM education in primary/elementary schools: Teachers' perceptions. in Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE). 2015. Cambridge, UK: IEEE. p. 3-7.21. Grubbs, M., Robotics intrigue middle school students and build STEM skills. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 2013. 72(6): p. 12.22. Kopcha, T., et al., Developing an integrative STEM curriculum for robotics education through educational design research
University for bringing industry projects into the classroom· University of Illinois-Chicago for the technological competency program for adults· Westark College for its work in vertical integration in manufacturing education Focus AIM Other Hope Adapt & Develop new Implement materials PRIME Curriculum Figure 1. Development of PRIME CurriculaThis process of
engineering principles that form the basis of civil engineering.Students work individually and in multidisciplinary teams to identify and solve engineeringproblems using their accumulated knowledge and experience along with advanced technologysuch as computers and laboratory equipment.Every CEE course can be characterized as a problem-solving course. Engineering design issuesand experiences are integrated throughout the undergraduate CEE Program, beginning with twosophomore courses in the curriculum sequence, Introduction to Environmental Engineering andStructural Engineering I. Issues related to safety, economics, ethics and social and global impactare discussed and considered in virtually every course. Students are also exposed to a widerange of
notebook’s ability to aid teachers in assessingtheir students' learning within the engineering curriculum. Third, we evaluated the designnotebook's ability to assist students with connecting with other learners in the class andteachers with connecting with their students.FindingsTheme 1 - Utility to Student LearningThe facilitator interviews revealed their perception of the design notebook’s utility for thestudents, and one of the main utilities emphasized by the facilitators was that the designnotebook was an important additional tool to help students solve problems in theircommunities.Teacher 1: “And then we design from the notebook…". “... [the community] want the studentto progress this program and then we approve the solution to create another
the requirements of 30 credit hours of core courses common to allcomputer science students. The students continue taking core courses until the first semester oftheir junior year, when they begin taking their electives from different specialization areas.In this paper, the authors are proposing a new area of specialization in their computer sciencedepartment called Embedded Systems Engineering. The paper elaborates the detail content ofthe curriculum requirement for this track.Embedded Systems EngineeringThe area of Embedded Systems Design has been gaining a tremendous growth in recent years. Amajor aspect of this growth has been the addition of networking technologies and operatingsystems to embedded systems. Embedded systems have
processwhereby learners set goals for their learning and then attempt to monitor, regulate, and controltheir cognition, motivation, and behavior, guided and constrained by their goals and thecontextual features in the environment” (p. 453). Specifically in Statics, successful students mustlearn to integrate knowledge and skills from several first-year engineering and mathematicscourses, effectively manage time and study strategies, and develop an awareness of whatconcepts may require additional attention to excel on high-stakes achievement tests. Thoughstudent success in any course is a function of these interdisciplinary skills, because Staticsrepresents such an early pivotal point in an engineering curriculum, student ability to self-regulate learning
study, but provide stronger evidence thatstudent involvement in HFOSS promotes student learning in the areas of tools and techniquesand technical knowledge about the process and tools used to develop an HFOSS project.1. IntroductionSoftware engineering programs as well as most computer science programs desire to providestudents with experience working on a real-world project in order to supply students with anunderstanding of professional practice including such skills as teamwork, communication, workethic, self-confidence and more. In fact, the SE 2004 curriculum guidelines2 emphasize the needfor including professional practice in the education of software engineers. A common way toprovide this experience is through instructor and/or student
objectives and learning outcomes, while based upon the specific program mission, allowdata collection, metrics for assessment and evaluation to be focused upon in-common corecourses. Certain aspects of the mission, goals, outcomes and objectives will differ betweenprograms. The assessment of the differences within each discipline is conducted withinspecialization courses with separate assessment methods. The final evaluation of data and theassessment of each program curriculum becomes a discipline dependent process with theanalysis and evaluation of data, and the program recommendations conducted as an independentfunction by specialization faculty and members of the program industrial advisory board.The University adopted an assessment plan for all
AC 2011-1324: THE EFELTS PROJECT - ENGINEERING FACULTY EN-GAGEMENT IN LEARNING THROUGH SERVICEChristopher W. Swan, Tufts University Chris Swan is an associate professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering with additional appoint- ments in the Jonathan M. Tisch College of Citizenship and Public Service and the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach at Tufts University. Dr. Swan has also served as chair of Tufts CEE depart- ment (2002-2007) and as an officer in the Environmental Engineering division of ASEE (2001-2005). Dr. Swan’s current interests lie in the areas of waste reuse, and service-based educational efforts in the engineering curriculum. Specific efforts involving engineering education concern
AC 2010-1485: DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A MASTERSPROGRAM IN COMPUTER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYHetal Jasani, Northern Kentucky University Hetal Jasani is an assistant professor in the Department of Computer Science at Northern Kentucky University. His research interests include mobile and wireless networks, distributed systems and network security. He teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in the area of computer networking including mobile and wireless networks and network security. He received the Ph.D. from Florida International University in 2006.Traian Marius Truta, Northern Kentucky University Traian Marius Truta is an assistant professor of Computer Science at Northern Kentucky
issues into the existing curriculum, rather than create an add-on for students.Courses taken for the Option all must be taken for a grade (not pass/fail) and in the followingthree areas: 1. Impact of Technology (1 course): These types of courses help students focus on how technology impacts marginalized communities. Examples of such courses are courses entitled “Race, Science, and Justice” and “Rehabilitation and Robotics.” These courses allow engineers to assess the needs of society and its marginalized communities and develop strategies to ensure that future technology solutions consider them. 2. Community Impact (1 course): These courses help students to develop and apply their knowledge of the interaction between
column entitled “Shopping Cart” shows how to apply the rubric to the shopping cart question from Figure 2. In this case, the proposed process is good (as indicated by the word “positive”) in that the shopping cart concept is analyzed for structural integrity. Recognizing this is worth one point (of the three total for this level). The proposed process is not good (as indicated by the word “Negative”), however, in that no other areas besides structure are analyzed for the shopping cart. Recognizing that other areas need to be analyzed is worth one additional point and giving at least one example of an additional analysis that would be needed is also worth one additional point. In Table 1, sample scores for
].Similarly, Bennis and Thomas highlight the importance of “crucible” experiences, negative eventsthat allow the leader to learn and grow four essential leadership skills: engaging others in sharedmeaning; distinctive, compelling voice; integrity; and adaptive capacity [2]. Leadership succession,however, is often relegated to status as a managerial activity intended to ensure the continuity of theproject team. In contrast, we believe that leadership succession is an important leadership skill thatteam members should cultivate. We are learning about leadership succession in the context ofNational Science Foundation Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (RED) projects, academicchange projects that involve diverse teams over multiple years. The RED
Slaughter, who has committed hislife’s work to dismantling racism specifically in engineering education. He called theorganization and members to recognize the challenges that systemic racism poses for theengineering field and to take action in changing the way our students are educated. Dr. Slaughterpointed out that without an inclusive engineering workforce, we are missing viable and importantsolutions to engineering problems.As engineering leadership educators, our obligation to our students extends beyond transmissionof technical knowledge. We have a responsibility to infuse our curriculum with knowledge ofsystemic racism, how bias can impact our solutions, and how engineers can lead and createteams that foster belonging and inclusivity. We
Paper ID #36541Exploring Engineering Students’ Decision Making Prioritiesin a Digital Plant EnvironmentJeffrey Stransky Jeffrey Stransky is a PhD candidate in the Experiential Engineering Education (ExEEd) Department at Rowan University. His research interests involve studying engineering ethics and decision making and using digital games as safe teaching environments. He has published in the overlap of these topics by integrating digital games into chemical engineering curriculum to help students build an awareness of the ethical and practical implications of their decisions. Jeffrey obtained his BS and MSc
and Environmental Policy, and Engineering Risk and Uncertainty and is active with K-12 outreach. She has strong interest in engineering education. She develops materials and researches best practical classroom approaches for integrating computation and computational thinking in introductory CEE courses; and for promoting teamwork, communication and problem-solving in context, throughout the CEE curriculum.Christopher TessumEleftheria KontouHadi Meidani Hadi Meidani is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He obtained his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering and his M.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Southern California
of group processes were introduced in theclass. By semester’s end, the students were expected to complete a complex design projectwhere parts are designed and integrated in a team effort. This final project, which Johnson et al4describes as “formal” cooperative learning, required the team to complete an assembly fromseveral individual component parts. The teams were selected by the instructor to ensurediversity of talent, culture, and performance level. Each team of four was assigned a number ofsmall component parts of an assembly, varying in difficulty. The team structure allowed forgroup roles to be self-assigned, therefore each group leader had the opportunity to distributeassignments according to ability. Upon completion of the project
and a starting point to adopt asimilar approach to training future engineers.METHODSARDEI content was readily incorporated into an existing graduate student courseThe two options for introducing ARDEI content into the graduate student curriculum were tocreate a new course or integrate content into an existing course. We chose to integrate contentinto an existing Professional Development Course in order to minimize extra time first-yeargraduate students would spend in class and to emphasize the importance of learning ARDEIconcepts alongside traditional professional development topics such as research safety,university library usage for research, presentation and writing skills, and fellowship writing.Finally, changing an existing course is
laboratory experiences and field trips. Thus the second reason for thelack of service-learning based courses in engineering-technology is that with the number ofproven pedagogical tools already available and in-use, engineering and technology faculty arenot yet ready to give serious consideration to implementing service-learning in their curriculum.III. Integrating Community Service in Construction Technology Curriculum at IUPUIService learning activities were first initiated in 1996, through the involvement of the students inthe three credit hour, senior course, CET 484: Principles of Wood and Timber Design, in a Page 5.249.2rehabilitation project
from student to student answer questions and monitoring studentprogress.Students are required to prove proficiency in each of the 12 subtopics. Students can completeassessment exams during any class period. If a student fails to achieve mastery of a topic, theycan retake the exam during another class period. An integrated midterm and final forces studentsto revisit previous topics and ensures that they maintain a reasonable schedule in terms of topicmastery. Theoretically, a bright and self-motivated student could achieve proficiency in all topicswithin 12 lecture periods.Conclusions:Student comments, observation of student behavior by the author, and performance on masteryexams have led the author to the following conclusions: • Online
. Collins, Integration of Simulation into the Undergraduate Fluid Mechanics Curriculum usingFLUENT, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Session: 1637, 2003.7. R. A. Pieritz, R. Mendes, R. F. A. F. Da Suva, C. R. Maliska, CFD Studio: An Educational Software Packagefor CFD Analysis and Design, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 12 (1), pp. 20-30, 2004.8. GNU General Public License (GPL), http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html9. Homepage of Virtual Flow Lab software, http://www.me.metu.edu.tr/cuneyt/VirtualFlowLab10. J. Blanchette, M. Summerfield , C++ GUI Programming with Qt 4, Prentice Hall, 2006.11. J.F. Thompson, B. Soni, N.P. Weatherrill, Handbook of Grid Generation, CRC Press, 1998.12. H.K. Versteeg, W. Malalasekera, An
courses. Wewill present perspectives and recommendations from our experiences in using this medium foreffective instruction of students.IntroductionIt is becoming increasingly common for students from chemistry, biology, and other physicalsciences to be interested in graduate work in chemical engineering. Such training answers apervasive need in research and industry for professionals with cross-disciplinary education. AtMichigan State University (MSU), we have found that the integration of these students into ourgraduate program enriches the experiences of our traditional chemical engineering students. Inaddition, the key concepts from the chemical engineering undergraduate curriculum serve asexcellent material for continuing education for
engineers. The outcomes werepublished in a new edition of SARTOR (Standards and Routes to Registration) in 19975. Thisintroduced many changes, many of which are not relevant to this study but one of thefundamental new features was an explicit requirement for accredited programmes to develop andassess student transferable skills within the curriculum: “All accredited engineering courses must provide for the personal and professional development of students. As all engineering students will not necessarily seek careers in engineering, the emphasis should be on personal development” 5.It would be good to think that the focus on communication skills over the last 20 years, to meetthe accreditation requirements of the professional body
greater appreciation. Several expressed surprise at therange of engineering evidenced in everyday life. When asked if the E3 experience would impacttheir teaching, all responded positively. Several felt that they could better explain to the studentswhy they were learning certain skills, while others planned to integrate engineering into theirteaching methodologies. The teachers were supported by the community of peers that was builtduring their experience. Cross-curriculum development and diversity were mentioned asbenefits. Many felt that the community could be sustained after the end of the summer program.Follow up plans include visits to the schools of the participating teachers. One participant hasbeen invited back to work on a NSF funded
an effortto commercialize research projects, often culminating with a business plan competition.Introducing entrepreneurship to graduate students has its benefits. First, student experience andsophistication can affect the willingness to participate in entrepreneurship courses. Secondly,graduate curriculum guidelines are less impacted by accreditation boards, specifically theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). Third, there is some generalconfusion among faculty and administrative personnel regarding the concept of entrepreneurshipand the pedagogy surrounding it. At the University of the Pacific School of Engineering andComputer Science, which does not have a graduate program, each of these problems wasencountered upon
) Engineering. She previously served as the project manager and lead editor of the NSF-funded TeachEngineering digital library (TeachEngineering.org, a free library of K-12 engineering curriculum), during which she mentored NSF GK-12 Fellows and NSF Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) par- ticipants from across the country on the creation and publication of their original engineering curriculum. Dr. Forbes is a former high school physics and engineering teacher and a former NSF GK-12 Fellow.Dr. Odesma Onika Dalrymple, University of San Diego Dr. Odesma Dalrymple is an Associate Professor and Faculty Lead for the Engineering Exchange for Social Justice, in the Shiley Marcos School of Engineering at University of San Diego
programdestinations was conceived. Counsel was sought from faculty from across large land-grantuniversities, colleges, and institutes. Individuals with expertise in intercultural learning, programleaders, and administrators serving at the dean level with international program responsibilitieswere consulted. The development of a curricular framework that integrated their feedback wascreated. One modification to the proposed curriculum was the addition of cultural humility as afocal point. Subsequently, the course STS 115, Pre-departure Intercultural Learning was created,and a decision was made to pilot programs utilizing the draft curriculum.In 2022, engineering student study abroad returnees were asked to comment on gaps in their pre-departure preparation