accreditation and first-year course design.Dr. Karl Brakora, Grand Valley State University Karl Brakora is an Assistant Professor in the area of electrical engineering at Grand Valley State Uni- versity. He previously worked for small companies and as an independent defense contractor to develop advanced ceramic materials, radar, and novel electronic fabrication methods applied to the development of guided munitions, electro-optic imaging systems, and medical devices. At GVSU he maintains electronic prototyping courses and co-created the School of Engineering’s professional ethics curriculum, which has become his primary academic focus. Karl received his Ph.D. in Applied Electromagnetics from the University of Michigan.Dr
, analyze, and solve technologicalproblems in a thoughtful, responsible way, within the context of society's structures and mores.IV. Curriculum Design and Learning Objectives for Liberal Education in Engineering EducationCurriculum DesignAs an area of study that encourages self-discovery, the exploration of different ways of thinking,and broad intellectual development, LE in engineering cannot be reduced to a single course ofstudy. No single pattern of learning is right for every student, teacher, program, or school. Infact, LE can be delivered in many ways, including: Traditional H&SS Courses. Courses entirely devoted to some aspect of a humanities or social science discipline and taught by experts in the discipline. These courses
Computer Engineering at New York Institute of Technology (NYIT) College of Engineering and Computing Sciences. He received his Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering from New York University (formerly Polytechnic University). Before joining to NYIT, Dr. Artan was on the faculty of the New York University School of Engineering. He also worked as an ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit) Design Engineer and designed integrated circuits for commercial, academic and military applications. Dr. Artan served in the organizing committees of the ACM/IEEE Symposium on Architectures for Networking and Communications Systems (ANCS), IEEE Sarnoff Symposium, and ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile
professional endeavors. This Page 26.1309.2integration enabled the instructor to teach mechanical design in a single course starting frombasics of stress analysis to prototyping. 1. IntroductionDesign is one of the core competencies in the engineering curriculum and is an essential skill forany engineer. Translation of a design concept from paper to prototype is a crucial step inassessing the performance of a design, and use of prototyping as a part of design coursereinforces a student’s learning experience. This paper presents a study regarding the relevanceand effectiveness of the use of 3D printers1 in a junior level machine design course
developing anddrawing these figures can double the development time for a question. Also, some students wanted to see a link between the Interactive LearningModules and simulation software. It is likely that some concepts would be reinforced bya simulation case. To maintain the ease of use, the simulation interface should be simple.Thus, we envisage an approach allowing limited user flexibility for a selected exercise;for example, the student could change only the controller gain and integral time for afixed process, noise, and input disturbance. However, intensive simulation exercises,involving student problem solving and in some cases limited programming, require amore complex interface to accommodate the open-ended nature of the
Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationfrom the words used in Statement 3 or from the labels applied to figure components. Finally,they can determine concretely whether the presentation is to the point at all if, for example, thestudent cites the figure while failing to provide an integrated discussion of the figure.Concrete approach to language and information Writing checklists are not unusual by themselves. Often they are created to coordinategrading across large teams of instructors and teaching assistants. When such checklists arepressed into classroom service, they offer students a class-specific gloss on particular graders’interests. But checklists
andmanagement present important aspects of systems engineering, and they were chosen as thefocus of an eight-day long class designed for three cohorts of 9-11th grade students attending anacademic summer camp. The aim of the class was to provide students with the knowledge andskills necessary to systematically identify possible sources of risk and ways to manage them, andin such a way to prepare them to become more critical problem solvers in the world of complexissues. The underlying idea that guided curriculum development was that students might learnbetter when they are able to apply what they learn in the classroom to everyday life, or toproblems that are of interest to them. Thus, the area of risk assessment and management waschosen as appropriate
, American Society for Engineering Educationeducation and knowledge relevant to the specific field of study. Further, the question ofaccountability requires that culminating work be regularly peer reviewed in the context ofaccreditation. 1By far, the literature answers the question: Is it advisable to include a senior capstone experiencein engineering and technology programs? It is advisable. The only questions remaining are: Howcan senior projects be efficiently implemented as a curriculum requirement, be validated byindustry, and meet regional and professional accreditation guidelines?An extensive 1995 review of capstone projects at nearly 300 engineering departments in 173schools 2 brought Todd and his fellow authors to conclude: “This type of
simulate a model of whathappens in the real world. One of the great strengths of SU's EE curriculum is theemphasis on fundamentals that apply to real world problems. The ultimate goal of thisdesign course is to bring together seniors in electrical engineering, and industrial designengineers with a focus on mixed signal testing of discrete components in themicroelectronics area. The lecture will cover the following topics: modern analog andmixed signal technologies, an introduction to test electrical characteristics of integratedcircuits (IC) and devices incorporating both digital and analog functions; the laboratorywill give the students an opportunity to test a variety of circuits for AC and DC
presentation, additional time is allocated for a question andanswer period. Many of the questions at this point are related to specific technical majors andprograms.In some cases, a single 50-minute session is simply not enough time to adequately cover a topic.In order to resolve this issue, a number of 50-minute sessions, usually two or three held onconsecutive days, are grouped together to form a type of short course or mini course. These areoften included as an integral part of an existing course in order to add depth and breadth to thesubject matter. The presenter is introduced to the audience as a guest lecturer or invited lecturer.This format offers flexibility, variety, and a change of pace for the class or audience.Evaluation and AssessmentAt
(CEL) can be defined as a type of experiential learning wherestudents collaborate with members of the broader community in support of learning goals.Service learning can also be considered a type of CEL. One stakeholder framework for CELprojects in a university setting is that they serve three main stakeholders with these being thecommunity, students and the university. CEL should provide value to the community partners byproviding a benefit to their organization which can take a variety of forms. CEL should providestudents an opportunity to apply the skills they are developing to a meaningful project. In termsof the university curriculum, CEL should provide opportunities for engagement and reflection onlearning outcomes. The reflection piece
Objectives(Letters indicate the TAC of ABET TC2K a-k requirements addressed) 1. Graduates are prepared with an understanding of fundamental technical sciences that are integrated with the applied technical specialty, such as engineering materials, electrical circuits, and computer-aided engineering graphics, developing analytical techniques and problem solving skills necessary to adapt to technological changes, and for a career in computer engineering technology.(a,b,f) 2. Graduates acquire industry relevant experience within the academic environment through laboratory projects, experimentation, classroom lecture and demonstrations, and acquire in-depth technical knowledge in areas such as
Expanding Access to and Participation in MIDFIELD (Year 6)AbstractThe Multiple Institution Database for Investigating Engineering Longitudinal Development(MIDFIELD) is a valuable resource enabling the study of students that includes longitudinal,whole population data for multiple institutions. Retention has been the dominant mode ofstudying student success in engineering and higher education in general. However, studying whomatriculates and who graduates does not tell the complete story of a student's path through theengineering curriculum nor should it be used as a measure of an institution. A national,longitudinal student unit-record database enables the study of engineering programs usingconsistent benchmarks and metrics. MIDFIELD has been used
milestone to advanceor re-direct their career paths.Mostly senior/graduate-level qualified faculty accomplish program facilitation and the teachingof Ph.D. coursework. Consortium Ph.D. faculty and administration often find the maintenanceof the program costly and an unrewarding burden. The program is investigating revising itscurriculum. Topical coursework concerning Technology Leadership, Management of TechnicalExperts, Production Processes and Control, Fundamentals of Technical Finance, ProjectManagement, Technology Marketing, and Strategic Management of Technology is underconsideration for inclusion in the curriculum. Finally, the consortium-based Ph.D. in TechnologyManagement has been compared with four other Ph.D. in Technology Management
continuing the work with Harvey Mudd College to furtherdevelop the designs and explore implementation in the Rosemont Preserve. Page 23.27.13Bibliographic Information 1.) Seifer, SD., Service-learning: community-campus partnerships for health professions education, Academic Medicine, 73(3), pp. 273-277, Mar 1998. 2.) S.B. Cashman and S.D. Seifer, “Service-Learning: An Integral Part of Undergraduate Public Health,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(3), pp. 273-278, 1 September 2008. 3.) R. Tolleson Knee, “Can Service Learning Enhance Student Understanding of Social Work Research?”, Journal of Teaching in Social
Paper ID #41826Work in Progress: Transformation Course-Based Undergraduate ResearchExperience (T-CURE)Dr. Heather Dillon, University of Washington Dr. Heather Dillon is Professor and Chair of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Washington Tacoma. Her research team is working on energy efficiency, renewable energy, fundamental heat transfer, and engineering education.EC Cline, University of Washington Tacoma Associate Professor in Sciences and Mathematics, and Director of ACCESS in STEM, an NSF S-STEM supported program that supports students in natural science, mathematics, and engineering at UW Tacoma.Dr. Emese
important aspects of theactivity. Some teachers seemed to treat these as enrichment activities that are peripheral to thecore curriculum. Since an IM activity might be implemented in different weeks by differentteachers, the observer has an impression that these activities were implemented by some teacherswhen they can spare a period. Nevertheless some teachers, especially those who attended thePDP workshop, seemed to appreciate the power the IM activities have in engaging students tothink and to reason.Initial observations of teacher implementations indicate a range of emphases. Approximatelyhalf of the teachers followed our intended model of exploiting the graphical programminglessons to contextualize discussion of algebraic concepts such as rise
Time learning adventure, users become participants in an interactive onlinegraphic novel that is integrated with video and an online game. This transmedia approach makesinteractive IE engineering narratives more immersive and emotionally engaging.It is important to note that the Talk to Me novel and associated learning adventures are allavailable for free on the TMW website. Because it can be accessed by everyone, TMW addressesconcerns about the shift toward transmedia resources widening the digital divide between richand poor adolescents.29,30V. Overview of the Through My Window Learning EnvironmentThrough My Window has a variety of elements that can be combined in different waysdepending upon teacher needs. It includes the following
. She haspublished articles on writing across the curriculum, classroom and computer-based simulations, and effectiveteaching and together with Richard Felder has presented over 100 teaching workshops throughout the United Statesand in Europe, the Far East, Africa, and South America. Dr. Brent received a B.A. degree in music education fromMillsaps College in 1978, a M.Ed. in education from Mississippi State University in 1981, and an Ed.D. fromAuburn University in 1988.RICHARD M. FELDERRichard M. Felder is Hoechst Celanese Professor of Chemical Engineering at North Carolina State University andco-director of the SUCCEED Coalition Faculty Development Program. He is co-author of the introductorychemical engineering text used by most American
practice in science and engage students in inquiry-based learning (Minner et al. 2010).In addition, a growing number of science teachers believe in the value of technologicalintegration (Howard, Chan, Caputi, 2015). Also, integrating technology in the classroom makesscience teachers feel more self-assured (Yerdelen-Damar et al. 2017). An extensive body ofresearch shows that teaching with explicit attention to models can result in substantial studentinvolvement in modeling instruction and increase their science understanding (Campbell et al.2015; Fulmer and Liang 2013; Gibson and Chase 2002; Stewart et al. 2005). In their analysis ofdefinitions of computational thinking, Weintrop et al. (2016) refer to computational models asBnon-static
indicated a number of opportunities and considerations for curriculum planningspecifically pertaining to outcome (i). Within the proposed ABET changes to student outcomes,it would appear that the proposed outcome 6, stated as “an ability to recognize the ongoing needfor additional knowledge and locate, evaluate, integrate, and apply this knowledgeappropriately,” attempts to capture some components of outcome (i). While this element ofinformation literacy was identified in the Abilities dimension of our findings, this is only oneaspect of how programs are currently addressing outcome (i). Our findings highlight the multipleways programs are thinking about outcome (i) that likely add value to students’ learning anddevelopment. We urge educators to
significant number of students fail to maintain crucial mathematical skills,impacting their success in physics. Notably, concerns have arisen from engineering majors whoexpress displeasure in being required to take math classes as part of the engineering curriculum.While math and engineering professors may find this objectionable, it is a reasonable concern,given that mathematics is often taught as an abstract discipline, and students need to grasp itsrelevance to their future roles as engineers.To address this issue, we have initiated the development of an Integrated Curriculum, startingwith two pairs of courses: MATH 140 (Calculus with Analytic Geometry I) paired with PHYS211 (General Physics: Mechanics), and PHYS 212 (General Physics: Electricity
. Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Creativity (5 points scale) 4.33 4.33 3.67 5.00 3.09DiscussionAs the results of the implementation of the beam design project in the Strength of Materials Course, thefollowing observations can be made: • Students learn more in a hands-on / creative environment. Building was an important part of this project. In 2007, some groups were extremely thoughtful in terms of assembly: grooves were made to improve the integrity and reduce the dependence on the glue. One group ran a FEA on the beam (this is typically an elective course during senior year). Prototypes were made by two groups, as mentioned earlier
. Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Creativity (5 points scale) 4.33 4.33 3.67 5.00 3.09DiscussionAs the results of the implementation of the beam design project in the Strength of Materials Course, thefollowing observations can be made: • Students learn more in a hands-on / creative environment. Building was an important part of this project. In 2007, some groups were extremely thoughtful in terms of assembly: grooves were made to improve the integrity and reduce the dependence on the glue. One group ran a FEA on the beam (this is typically an elective course during senior year). Prototypes were made by two groups, as mentioned earlier
?.? . Isen_se_of coordinating and integrating the multiple and detailed tasks. An ability and readiness forinterdisciplina~ cooperation is thus highly necessary. This anticipates the receptivity of hydraulic engineers to a :close cooperation with biologists, chemists, ecologists, landscape planners, economists, etc. ..—The previous issues bring challenges to a variety of professionals for assuming critical attitudes coupled withprudence. The main subject for hydraulic engineers, water in its numerous forms, is one of the most preciousresources on earth. Therefore, a major concern for a hydraulic engineer is to ensure a stable and sustainablewater supply with reasonable water resources management by controlling the quantity and quality of watersuppllied
communications, engineering economy, and construction planning, scheduling, estimating, and management.Ms. Candace Mazze, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Candace E. Mazze is a Research Assistant at the University of North Carolina, Charlotte. Her research interests include curriculum design and assessment of learning. She received her master’s degree in elementary education from Pfeiffer University and is currently enrolled in the educational leadership doctoral program at the University of North Carolina, Charlotte. She has prior teaching and administrative experience in private and public school systems.Dr. Sandra Loree Dika, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Sandra Loree Dika is an assistant Professor of
challenges international students experience in the U.S., counseling of student-athlete populations, and experiences of student vet- erans in higher education. She serves as a Research Assistant at UNC Charlotte as part of an Office of Naval Research grant supporting student veterans and engineering curriculum innovation. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Gendered Experience of Engineering Knowledge in Military Technology ClassAbstractInformed by social-constructivist and standpoint feminist theories, this ethnographic case studyexplored how male and female students evaluated the value, relevance, and
these design projects that offer them an understanding ofengineering and engineering technology and motivate them to take additional courses within theengineering curriculum. They gain a much better “sense” of engineering. Design projects infreshmen courses improve the course content, improve enrollment, and have a positive impact onthe learning experience.IntroductionWhile studying recruiting and retention issues for the Engineering Technology and IndustrialStudies Department at Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU), one of the professors took an Page 8.1157.1innovative approach in his introductory engineering fundamentals course by
context to the underlying fundamentals, using digital learning objects.Ms. Darlee Gerrard, University of Toronto Darlee Gerrard is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at the University of Toronto. She received her Hon. B.Sc. from the University of Toronto, B.Ed. from Brock University, and Masters degree from Memorial University. She coordinates leadership and community outreach programs in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at the University of Toronto. Her research interests include STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) education, co-curricular and experiential learning, and the equity and accessibility of education.Dr. Deborah Tihanyi, University of Toronto Deborah Tihanyi is an
Proceedings of 2014 Zone 1 Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE Zone 1) Mastery Learning in Statics Using the STEMSI Online Learning Environment Franco M. Capaldi An informal discussion with students who were currently Abstract—Statics is the foundation course upon which much of using online homework systems revealed that students dislikedthe Civil and Mechanical Engineering curriculum is based. A using these systems for several reasons. Students find itsolid understanding in this course can help to propel students difficult