Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 9901 - 9930 of 12604 in total
Conference Session
Experiments in Remote-access Laboratories
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Andrew Hyder, Georgia Institute of Technology; Brian Post, Georgia Institute of Technology; Dirk Schaefer, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies
physical laboratories how they can be implemented throughtoday’s technologies. Templates for developing a cohesive set of remote laboratories areidentified along with Nemours IT considerations. In addition to the requirements related totechnology, educational impacts are addressed. An example of a Control Systems experiment isthen presented as an example of a functioning remote laboratory.1. Introduction The engineering students of yesterday have permanently changed the way we presentlylive and work with technology. It is essential that we take full advantage of their contributions inorder to prepare the minds of the future. Advancements in telecommunication practices havemade learning from remote locations viable, thereby granting access
Conference Session
Potpourri: Various Issues and Topics in Graduate Studies
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Donna M Mohr, Lehigh University; Jennifer H. Gross P.E., Lehigh University; Raymond A Pearson, Lehigh University; John B Ochs, Lehigh University; Ana-Iulia Alexandrescu, Lehigh University
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies
Paper ID #16291Graduate Recruiting for Emerging One-Year Professional Master’s ProgramsDr. Donna M Mohr, Lehigh University Donna Mohr is the Director of Graduate Recruiting and Program Development for the P.C. Rossin Col- lege of Engineering and Applied Science. In 1999, she earned a B.S. in chemistry from Drexel University. She pursued her graduate studies at Michigan State University, earning an M.S. in forensic science (2002) and a Ph.D. in chemistry (2003). She completed her postdoctoral work at the Federal Bureau of In- vestigation’s Counterterrorism and Forensic Science Research Unit before joining the faculty of
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alexander John De Rosa, University of Delaware; Ashley Lytle; Maxine Fontaine, Stevens Institute of Technology ; Frank T. Fisher, Stevens Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
Paper ID #39398Board 209: Adaptive Expertise: A Potential Tool for Supporting S-STEMStudent Retention and GraduationDr. Alexander John De Rosa, University of Delaware Alex De Rosa is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Delaware. His research focuses on improving the educational experience through the creation and promotion of new teaching tools and techniques. Alex is particularly interested in the areas of deeper learning and knowledge transfer, where he is working to help students better apply their knowledge and skills in new contexts, including in their future
Conference Session
First-year Programs Division Technical Session 2: Design in the First Year: Challenges and Successes
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Reid Bailey, University of Virginia
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
 comparative  study  on  undergraduate  and  practicing  engineer  knowledge  of  the  roles  of   problem  definition  and  idea  generation  in  design.  International  Journal  of  Engineering  Education,   2008.  24(2):  p.  226-­‐233.  2.   Newstetter,  W.C.,  Of  green  monkeys  and  failed  affordances:  A  case  study  of  a  mechanical  engineering   design  course.  Research  in  Engineering  Design,  1998.  10(2):  p.  118-­‐128.  3.   National  Research  Council,  How  people  learn:  brain,  mind,  experience,  and  school.  2000:  National   Academies  Press.  4.   Ambrose,  S.A.,  et  al.,  How  Learning  Works:  Seven  Research-­‐Based  Principles  for  Smart  Teaching.  2010
Conference Session
ASEE Multimedia Session
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Susan Miller; Mara Wasburn
Reaching Out to High School Girls: The Role of a Student Organization in Developing an On-campus Technology Workshop Mara H. Wasburn, Susan G. Miller Purdue UniversityAbstractWomen and girls will comprise at least half of the available science, engineering, and technologytalent pool. Therefore, it becomes imperative to attract more women and girls into thesedisciplines. In 2002 at Purdue University, the student group Women in Technology invited aselect number of high school juniors who were at risk of losing interest in math, science, andcomputers, and their parents to the Purdue campus for an all-day workshop. The program wasplanned, designed, and executed
Conference Session
Emerging Trends in Graduate Education
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Ronald Bennett
3155 Implementing Innovation Ronald J. Bennett, Ph.D. Engineering and Technology Management University of St. Thomas St. Paul, MinnesotaABSTRACTIn 2002, a paper was presented at the ASEE Annual Conference titled “Selling Innovation.”(Bennett) The content related to a course taught to working adult graduate students in the Masterdegree programs in Engineering and Technology Management at the University of St. Thomas.These students are employed in a wide range of innovative
Conference Session
Teaching Strategies in BME
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Marcus Pandy; Anthony Petrosino; Ronald Barr
. Cockerham, and D. Nopachai for their help with module development. Page 8.380.6 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationReferences[1] Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R. (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.[2] Schwartz, D.L., Brophy, S., Lin, X.D., Bransford, J.D. (1999). Software for managing complex learning: Examples from an educational psychology course. Educational Technology Research and Development
Collection
2001 Annual Conference
Authors
Xueshu Song; Philip Pilcher; Charles Billman; Radha Balamuralikrishna
groundbreaking, proactive learning tool for thisprofession. Three modules addressing landing gear operation, turbine engine and aircraftstability comprises the aviation maintenance training on line system. We believe that thisnew learning system will address the needs of the aviation industry worldwide, and enable ashorter cycle time in training aircraft maintenance technicians thereby reducing overalltraining costs for the industry as a whole. Although our system is primarily designed toprepare professionals, it may also be used to advertise general engineering or aeronauticalengineering as a career choice for middle and high school students. As more and moreyoung people become computer literate early on in their lives, integrated media tools will
Collection
2001 Annual Conference
Authors
Cameron Wright; Michael Morrow; Thad Welch
Page 6.180.2and TI) have long histories of offering deep discounts to educators on their products, the fact Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationremains that these are professional tools, which in general, were not initially designed witheducation in mind. For the experienced student these tools are like a dream-come-true, in thatthey have the power that a professional set of tools brings, but at an educationally affordableprice! On the other hand, for the inexperienced student, these same tools may be described astoo powerful, too steep of a learning curve, too feature rich, confusing, etc…1.2
Collection
2000 Annual Conference
Authors
Karim M. El-Dash
personal skills of the student more thanpumping routine methodologies into student’s mind. In engineering education, as in many other programs, it is required to raise the mentalskills as well as repetitive capacities of the student. Perception is generally deemed as personaltalent but it may be enhanced through the different stages of education and practice. Open-endedproblems, multiple solutions offered for a single problem, brainstorming, seminars, anddiscussion are different types for the required improvement of a future decision-maker. Theinstructor has to find out the appropriate method with respect to the course, subject, type oflecture, duration and time available within the course, instructor characters, reflex of students,and the
Collection
1998 Annual Conference
Authors
Ronald V. Wiedenhoeft
having contact with philosophy develop more valid ways ofreasoning. Humanities classes, he says, “should stimulate and stretch the mind.” WilliamBennett, in his To Reclaim a Legacy, reiterates some of the great, fundamental questions of alltime that, presumably, engineering students have seldom found raised in traditional curricula. “What is justice? What should be loved? What deserves to be defended? What is cour- age? What is noble? What is base? Why do civilizations flourish? Why do they decline? What can I know? What should I do? What may I hope for?”5The essence of the new paradigm lies precisely in raising such questions and earnestly grapplingwith possible answers. Not a new dogma is thereby defined, but a new
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Wade C. Driscoll
Session 2457 Parametric Case Studies - Closing the Loop Wade C. Driscoll Industrial and Systems Engineering Youngstown State University AbstractTraditional case studies have proven to be effective means for teaching engineering design.Unfortunately, traditional case studies, in which all students in a class simultaneously work on thesame case study, may result in inappropriate levels of student interaction. A parametric case studyis a generalization of a
Conference Session
EM Skills and Real World Concepts
Collection
2005 Annual Conference
Authors
Jason Wolter
Development of an Acquisition Management Course Jason Wolter, M.S., Roger Burk, Ph.D., Bob Foote, Ph.D., Niki Goerger, Ph.D., Willie McFadden, Ph.D., Timothy E. Trainor, Ph.D. United States Military AcademyAbstract In response to external feedback and a continual desire to increase the diversity andapplicability of the curriculum for our students, the Engineering Management Program at USMAwill offer an acquisition systems management course for the first time in Spring 2005. Thiscourse will provide graduates with relevant skills related to the acquisition goals of strategicallymanaging, planning, and implementing acquisition programs and reforms. Topics will
Collection
2007 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference
Authors
Shaina Slonim; Richard Puerzer
. The paper can be graded based on the summary andrelating the speaker’s work to the course. The reaction papers can be evaluated for the outcome on theevidence the student expanded his/her view, as the rubric discusses.journals and the Blackboard message board The message board feature of Blackboard or some other type of journal can be used in a similarmanner. Both can be used in all engineering courses to encourage students to link what they learn in classto the real world. On Blackboard, either the professor or the students can post a topic to be discussed.There would be a minimum number of entries required per student per week. In a journal, students canwrite anything on their minds about what they are learning in class, especially
Collection
2009 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference
Authors
W. Riddell; S. Bakrania; K. Bhatia; J. Courtney; K. Dahm; R. Harvey; L. Weiss
Putting the horse before the cart – Fitting a new project into established design and writing pedagogy W. Riddell†, S. Bakrania†, K., Bhatia†, J. Courtney, K. Dahm†, R. Harvey‡, L. Weiss†† College of Engineering† College of Communication‡ College of Liberal Arts and Sciences†† Rowan UniversityProject-based learning has been an important aspect of the Rowan University College ofEngineering curriculum since its inception in 19961. In the fall of the sophomore year,engineering students take a multidisciplinary, integrated, project-based course that is designed toteach both
Collection
2009 Northeast Section Meeting
Authors
W. Riddell; S. Bakrania; K. Bhatia; J. Courtney; K. Dahm; R. Harvey; L. Weiss
Putting the horse before the cart – Fitting a new project into established design and writing pedagogy W. Riddell†, S. Bakrania†, K., Bhatia†, J. Courtney, K. Dahm†, R. Harvey‡, L. Weiss†† College of Engineering† College of Communication‡ College of Liberal Arts and Sciences†† Rowan UniversityProject-based learning has been an important aspect of the Rowan University College ofEngineering curriculum since its inception in 19961. In the fall of the sophomore year,engineering students take a multidisciplinary, integrated, project-based course that is designed toteach both
Conference Session
Materials Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nabila Shamim, Prairie View A&M University; Anh Nguyen, Prairie View A&M University; Sheena Reeves, Prairie View A&M University; Ariful Bhuiyan
. This project helped reinforce problem-solving in engineering and helped expand our minds on another software that is possibly applicable to a future career. 3. Through this experiment, we have gained insight on how the design process works, how long we can expect our prints to take, and some of the challenges we can expect to confront.Students also comment on self-efficacy, we learned from the 3D printing assignment is that tomake a successful print you have to understand the structural needs of your design and possibleweak points. As we continue offering this course, we will develop new projects and modules to deliverto the students. We also plan to collect and publish more formal assessment data with a
Conference Session
Computers in Education Division - General Technical Session 1
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Glenn W Ellis, Smith College; Yanning Yu, Northwestern University
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
 that  you  will  face  in  the  real  world.    Learning  how  to  figure  out  what  information  is  important,  how  to  frame  a  problem,  what  simplifications  are  needed,  and  what  still  needs  to  be  learned  are  critical  to  your  success  in  engineering.    The  good  news:    research  shows  that  you  can  develop  this  deeper  understanding  through  collaborating  with  peers  to  better  understand  and  innovate  solutions  to  real-­‐world  problems.    I  hope  you  take  full  advantage  of  this  way  of  learning  in  EGR  270  to  be  creative,  have  fun  and  expand  your  mind.    What  Will  You  Learn  in  EGR  270?    EGR  270  has  three  intended  learning  outcomes.    The  first  focuses  on  learning
Collection
2010 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference
Authors
Andrew Grossfield P.E.
engineering students visualize in their minds,loading, shear and moment diagrams in order to predict deflections. Freebody diagrams areessential to the solution of statics problems. It is wrong to deny engineering students theadvantages of visualizing math functions in their math courses. But the Dirichlet function andthe other “monstrous” functions that scared the 19th century mathematicians cannot bevisualized. Limit the first course in calculus to the piece-wise continuous and monotonicfunctions that the engineering students need and are able to visualize. Let us concede it isunsound to teach everything all at once and let these functions be studied in the order they werediscovered by mankind. When function sequences and series are studied, and
Conference Session
Advancing Thermal Science Education
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Christopher Jeruzal; Brenda Henderson; Ahmad Pourmovahed
course objectives and instructor expectations. It was also necessary to identifyavailable tools.B. The assessment plan The intent of the Energy Systems Laboratory course is to provide students with an integratedenergy systems experience and to provide students with opportunities to develop effectivecommunication skills. Simply acquiring data and performing calculations is not enough. Thestudents must understand, apply, and communicate results. With this in mind, the courselearning objectives were divided into four objectives dealing with the application of fundamentalconcepts and engineering tools, and two objectives dealing with communication skills andeffective team working skills. Mastering all of these objectives prepares the students for
Collection
2014 ASEE Zone 4 Conference
Authors
through the Use of CommonTeaching Tools ................................................................................................................................................................... 173Integration of State-of-the-Art Low Cost Components into Embedded and Digital Systems DesignCourses .................................................................................................................................................................................. 182Hands, Mind and Hearts-on Design Experiences .................................................................................................. 194 Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference
Conference Session
Assessment in Laboratory and Project-based Courses: Experimentation and Laboratory-oriented Studies Division
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Nebojsa I. Jaksic, Colorado State University, Pueblo
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies
Education: International Perspectives on Curriculum Change, Sense Publishers, Springer, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 2017.[12] J. E. Mills and D. F. Treagust, “Engineering Education – Is Problem-Based or Project-Based Learning the Answer,” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, The Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Inc., pp. 2 – 16, 2003.[13] L.S. Vigotsky, Thought and language, Cambridge, MA: M.I.T Press, 1962.[14] L.S. Vigotsky, Mind in society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.[15] A. Kozulin, “Vygotsky’s theory in the classroom: Introduction,” European Journal of Psychology Education, Vol. XIX, No.1, pp. 3 – 7, 2004.[16] W. Damon, “Peer Education: The Untapped Potential
Conference Session
Faculty Development Medley!
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division
integration,” Journal of Engineering Education, 82(1), pp. 3-8, 1993.5. J. Bordogna, E. Fromm, and E. W. Ernst, “An integrative and holistic engineering education,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(3), pp. 191-198, 1995.6. J. Bransford, A. Brown, and R. Cocking, How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school, Washington, DC: Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council, 2000.7. R. J. Shavelson, and L. Towne, Scientific research in education. Committee on scientific principles for education research, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2002.8. E. L. Boyer, Scholarship
Conference Session
Workshop, Program, and Toolkit Results
Collection
2005 Annual Conference
Authors
David Devine
Session 2745 ExCEEd Impact on a New Professor David P. Devine Indiana University Purdue University Fort Wayne Abstract The purpose of this paper is to present quantitative information and qualitative remarks regarding the impact of the ExCEEd Teaching Workshop (ETW) on an assistant professor of civil engineering technology at a regional campus of a large state university system in the Midwest. The participant attended the ETW during the summer between the first and second years of a tenure eligible appointment. Features of the ETW were adapted to the participant ’s teaching immediately
Collection
2001 Annual Conference
Authors
Franklin King; Keith Schimmel
program outcomes have been met. The committees make decisions relating tochanges in courses and make recommendations relating to program changes to the departmentoutcomes assessment committee.I. IntroductionEngineering programs in the U.S. are accredited by the Engineering Accreditation Commissionof the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (EAC/ABET)1. In the past,programs were evaluated using a set of criteria that prescribed most of the courses and activitiesthat a program had to offer to be accredited. If a department followed ABET’srecommendations, their programs were generally accredited. Beginning in 2001, all programsare being evaluated based on the outcomes of the programs and the skills of their graduates.Universities
Conference Session
Innovative Curriculum Development in EET
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Jerome Tapper; Walter Buchanan
Session 1448 INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS PROVIDE PROGRESS REPORT CARD FEEDBACK ON NEWLY DEVELOPED INDUSTRIAL CONTROL SYSTEMS LABORATORY Jerome Tapper, Walter W. Buchanan Northeastern University, Boston, MassachusettsAbstract ¾ In order for engineering technology programs to provide more formidable state-of-the-art programs for their students, program administrators must gain insight into theworthiness of their curricula. Engineering technology programs and courses supported andevaluated by industry representatives are quite valuable in preparing students for responding tolocal
Collection
2011 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting
Authors
Pacific Southwest Regional ASEE ConferenceTransforming Engineering Education through Community Engagement, Entrepreneurship and Service Learning California State University, Fresno Fresno, CA 93740 March 31 – April 2, 2011 California State University ◊ Fresno Henry Madden Library ii   The Conference Organizing Committee wishes to express its warmest gratitude to thefollowing
Collection
2024 ASEE North East Section
Authors
Abhishek Kumar, Wentworth Institute of Technology
22-25, 2003, p 11408-11411.4. Felder, R. M. and Silverman, L. K.,(1988), “Learning and Teaching Styles in EngineeringEducation,” Engineering Education 78(7), pp. 674-681.5. Jensen, E. (1998), “Teaching with the Brain in Mind,” Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervisionand Curriculum Development.6. Klegka, J.S. and O'Donovan, T.E.,(2002), “Using SIMULINK as a design tool”, ASEE AnnualConference Proceedings, Jun 16-19, 2002, p 8505-8517. .7. Metzger, R.P. and Rodriguez, A.,(2002), “An Interactive Modeling, Simulation, Animation, andReal-Time Control (MoSART) flexible Inverted Pendulum Environmnet”, ASEE Annual ConferenceProceedings, Jun 16-19, 2002, p 1-9.8. Rao, S.S., “Mechanical Vibrations”, 6th edition, Pearson9. https
Conference Session
College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP) Technical Session 2
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jagadish Torlapati, Rowan University; Jodi F. Prosise, University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Philip J. Parker, P.E., University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Kauser Jahan, Rowan University; Moira Kelly Smith
Tagged Divisions
College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP)
Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Engineering Department (MEIE)and Rowan University’s Civil and Environmental Engineering Department. We also present thepartnership projects developed as a part of these workshops at both universities. We believe thatthese collaborations will lead to industry insights in our programs that will map toEntrepreneurially Minded Learning (EML), a pedagogical framework developed by KernEntrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) to promote graduates to become value creatorsfor their organizations. This focuses on developing skills in undergraduate engineering studentssuch that they are poised to create extraordinary value in their future organizations. EML seeksto expand the notion that design is focused on technical
Conference Session
K-12 Outreach Initiatives
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Tamy Fry; Mark A. Nanny; Mary John O'Hair; Teri Reed Rhoads
Session 2530 A Survey of Authentic Teaching in Secondary Math and Science Classrooms Tamy L. Fry1 , Teri Reed Rhoads 1 , Mark Nanny 2 and Mary John O’Hair3 The University of Oklahoma School of Industrial Engineering 1 School of Civil Engineering and Enviro nmental Science 2 Center for Educational and Community Renewal3Abstract The Authentic Teaching Alliance (ATA) is a project funded through the National ScienceFoundation GK-12 program in which University of Oklahoma Fellows from engineering andeducation