Associate Teaching Professor and the Vice-Chair for Undergraduate Education in the Computer Science and Engineering Department at UC San Diego. In addition to research related to Automata Theory and Computability education, she works on projects that support professionalization pathways for students, including industry internships, TA development, and ethics and communication. Her research and teaching have work has been supported by grants and awards from UC San Diego, NSF, and industry partners.Kristen Vaccaro, University of California San Diego Kristen Vaccaro is an Assistant Professor of Computer Science & Engineering at the University of Cali- fornia San Diego, where she is also a member of the Design Lab. Her
approach,instead it could be a solidification of already existing ideas alongside a change in how these ideasare communicated.Public standards within a knowledge generating community are established guiding principles,ideals, and goals which are used to evaluate knowledge, theories, and outcomes [13]. We expectstandards adopted by an EER team could be related to data quality/validation, disciplinary norms,research ethics, stakeholder requirements, or standards specifically applicable to that team. Whilewithin an idealized knowledge generating community, the standards would be shared among allmembers of the team, we anticipate that on EER teams there may be certain standards that are notshared across the team or present in different ways from one
competencies in fundamentals of engineering in a highly interactive format. Topics includeprofessional skills such as technical communication (both verbal and writing), guidelines for professionalengineering practice, ethics and selected topics from Electrical, Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering.This design-focused course teaches an engineering approach to problem-solving with special emphasis onteamwork, oral and written communication, creativity, ingenuity, and computer-aided design tools. Theinstructional approach used in this course involves first-year engineering students as active participants inthe learning process. Four sections of the Fundamentals of Engineering course participated in this studyand were taught by four School of Engineering
] R. Kuo, A. Zhang, V. Shaw, and C. Wang, “#FeministAntibodies: Asian American Media in the Time of Coronavirus,” Social Media + Society, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 2056305120978364, Oct. 2020.[6] A. C. Kao, “Invisibility of Anti-Asian Racism,” AMA Journal of Ethics, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 507–511, Jul. 2021.[7] C. S. Lee and A. Jang, “Questing for Justice on Twitter: Topic Modeling of #StopAsianHate Discourses in the Wake of Atlanta Shooting,” Crime & Delinquency, p. 00111287211057855, Dec. 2021.[8] M. Creusere, H. Zhao, S. Bond Huie, and D. R. Troutman, “Postsecondary Education Impact on Intergenerational Income Mobility: Differences by Completion Status, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and Type of Major,” The Journal of Higher
Responsible and Appropriate Conduct of Introduction to Research The Business Model Canvas Research* Undergraduate Research: A Necessity in Creating an ePortfolio Ethics in the Engineering Profession* Cross-Disciplinary Engineering Education* How to Write Compelling Research & Plagiarism and Academic Social activity canceled due to Covid-19 Personal Statements for Grad
hard to educate myself and other club members about. Although Iknew there were (and still are) other people on the team who understand the importanceof doing community-centered project work, I felt limited in my ability to “rock the boat”by my lack of experience and general confusion about EWB’s project process. Much ofwhat I’d read about sustainable, ethical development revolved around thoughtful andequitable community assessment and collaboration, so why did our project begin with aproblem statement handed down from EWB? As time went on, I became increasinglydissatisfied with our team’s efforts to understand the partner community and create anassessment plan. I was extremely frustrated and overwhelmed by the complexity of whatwe had to do
encouraged to choose from variety of cultural traits including Language,Nationality, Aesthetics (Music, Literature, art, crafts, dance), Architecture, Religion, Celebra-tions, Rituals, Myths, Customs, Clothing and Fashion and Ethics (hierarchies, behavior as goodand bad). The cultural influence on the product should be incorporated into the conceptual stageof design. Students should carefully consider what aspects of the culture are going to be in-cluded in the product. Rather than being superficial additions to a product, cultural aspectsshould influence the design, usage, and purpose of the product. Culture and purpose should haveequal influence on the final design.Post-activity reflection and student work productsForty-six students in the
stresses rhetoric and argument, bothin society in general as well as the academic community. Beginning in Spring 2005, theCollege of Engineering is sponsoring a section of Composition II specifically forengineers. The course continues to stress rhetoric, but it does so through technicalwriting. Students are introduced to general business discourse and formats, but the coursealso introduces them to technical writing, including ethical issues within engineering. Asthe syllabus for the course states, “While all English 1304 students are expected to exit the course with a good working knowledge of the fundamentals of critical analysis and argument, students in this section will also work with persuasion as it functions in
Accreditation Council Training Committee. He was previously a Member-At-Large on the Computing Accreditation Commis- sion Executive Committee and a Program Evaluator for both computer engineering and computer science. Estell is well-known for his significant contributions on streamlining student outcomes assessment pro- cesses and has been an invited presenter at the ABET Symposium on multiple occasions. He was named an ABET Fellow in 2021. Estell is also a founding member and current Vice President of The Pledge of the Computing Professional, an organization dedicated to the promotion of ethics in the computing professions. Estell is Professor of Computer Engineering and Computer Science at Ohio Northern University
Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor (emerita) of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford Univer- sity. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 The Nexus of Entrepreneurship and Innovation–a new construct for looking at the creative contributions of engineering graduatesABSTRACTEngineers are called upon to possess strong analytical and communication skills, exhibitpractical ingenuity, and be creative thinkers, all the while upholding high ethical standards. Inmore recent times they are also expected to be innovative and
evaluators have access to individual responses. Reassure that reports on the COI will only include aggregated responses and non- identifiable comments. Assurance and trust have to be there or participants, especially those who feel identifiable, will not respond or will put “prefer not to answer” on the demographic variables of interest. Surveys have to follow ethical guidelines. Step 3. Top-down Support Have the Center director send a Center-wide email about the importance of completing the survey prior to deploying it, and then a reminder to complete the survey closer to the deadline. Make it clear in the latter email that the director does not have access to who completes the survey or to the individual level data
: • Ethical responsibilities • Economic benefits • Health and Safety • Societal context • Environmental • Global effects • Detailed Design were addressed as applicable (As driven by type & nature of the design project) Systems Diagram (Interfacing, power, signals) Materials/Mechanical System Manufacturing & Process Planning System Simulation / Industrial System Thermal System Electrical System Computer System
consider the ethical and practical considerations involved in working with real data. This principle aligns with the constructivist • Design assignments and projects that require students to apply their knowledge learning theory, which posits that people learn and skills to real-world problems or scenarios [Apache Spark and Hadoop] best when they are actively involved in • Encourage students to take an interdisciplinary approach to problem-solving,(c). Incorporate case constructing their own understanding of new incorporating
4COMM 1315 Public Speaking 3 TOTAL 15 TOTAL 15 SECOND YEARINEN 2373 Engineering Economics 3 INEN 3380 Work Design 3INEN 3322 Engr. Matls. & Procs. 3 ELEN 3310 Fundamentals of EE 3CVEN / MEEN 2301 Statics 3 MATH 3301 Diff. Eq. 3MATH 2318 Linear Algebra 3 Creative Arts Elective 3PHYS 2426 Physics II 4 PHIL 2306 Ethics 3 TOTAL 16
. H. Jan Reed, Appreciative Inquiry: Research for Action in Handbook of Research on Information Technology Management and Clinical Data Administration in Healthcare, Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2009, pp. 631-645.[20] J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, 1991.[21] A. Bandura, "Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency," American Psychologist, vol. 37, no. 2, p. 122–147, 1982.[22] E. Wenger, "Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity," Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.[23] M. C. Loui, "Ethics and the Development of Professional Identities of Engineering Students," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 383-390, 2005
-likeresponsibilities such as attending class, grading key assignments like visual aids, running studenthelp sessions, and performing their own presentations as examples. The student mentors arerecommended by instructors based on exemplary work ethic that was demonstrated as a studentof the course. They receive payment as employees of the university. Student mentors are acritical part of the course as they provide a student point of view. Through this experience, thestudent mentors continue to develop more communication skills through mentorships.Lead Instructor Another way of managing quality across sections is the investment in and appointment ofa lead instructor who acts as a liaison between the Communication Arts and SciencesDepartment and the
assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, nonverbal communication in the classroom, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a significant number of journal articles and book chapters on these topics. Dr. Barry is the 2020 recipient of ASEE’s National Outstanding Teaching Award.Dr. Rebecca Zifchock, United States Military Academy Dr. Rebecca Zifchock joined the faculty at the United States Military Academy in 2010 after receiving her bachelor’s degree in Biological and Mechanical Engineering at Cornell University, and master’s and Ph.D. degrees in Biomechanics at the Pennsylvania State University and the University of Delaware
State University- San Luis Obispo.Emily Flores Emily Flores is an undergraduate student studying Liberal Arts and Engineering Studies concentrating in Computer Science and Interdisciplinary Studies at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. She believes in coding ethically and ensuring that the products of our knowledge create a positive impact for all communities.Dr. Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jane Lehr is a Professor in Ethnic Studies and Women’s & Gender Studies and Director of Student Re- search at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. She is affiliated faculty in Computer Science and Software Engineering and Science
. 159, 1977, doi: 10.2307/2529310.[35] J. L. Hess, J. Strobel, and A. O. Brightman, “The Development of Empathic Perspective- Taking in an Engineering Ethics Course,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 534–563, 2017, doi: 10.1002/jee.20175.[36] C. D. Batson, S. Early, and G. Salvarani, “Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel,” Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 751–758, Jul. 1997, doi: 10.1177/0146167297237008.[37] M. H. Davis et al., “Cognitions associated with attempts to empathize: How do we imagine the perspective of another?,” Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull., vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1625–1635, 2004, doi: 10.1177/0146167204271183.[38] M. H
. Waymo reported of 20 million miles of autonomousdriving at the beginning of 2020. Many Other non-traditional automobile companies such asAmazon, Apple, Aptiv, Baidu, Nvidia, Uber are competing with traditional automakers such asAudi, Honda, GM, Huawei, Mercedez-Benz, etc. for the market share [35]. The success for autonomous cars involves smart technology involves digital map, highlyreliable and accurate sensing technology for connected systems, powerful computing, machinelearning among others. Some of the other major issues besides the autonomous drivingtechnology are consumer privacy, cybersecurity, safety regulation, ethical issues, which need tobe resolved in order to develop autonomous vehicles as a consumer product [36]. Making
Paper ID #33346The International Engagement of Engineering Education in China: AHistorical Case Study of Tsinghua UniversityZheping Xie, Tsinghua UniversityDr. Xiaofeng Tang, Tsinghua University Xiaofeng Tang is Associate Professor in the Institute of Education at Tsinghua University. Prior to his current position, Dr. Tang worked as an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineer- ing Education at The Ohio State University. He did postdoctoral research in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received his Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Prof. Fujun Jin
success of the project. For example, Robert originally did not evaluate eachindividual’s strengths and instead assigned each person parts without a specific direction. Helater found that the roles had to be redistributed because group members did not know how to dotheir parts, so the tasks were then divided by strengths and were more successfully completed.Similarly, Stanley noted that when delegating tasks for their virtual team project, pairing teammembers with tasks that fit their major helped in keeping the project going smoothly by havingcomputer science majors complete the website and the mechanical engineering majors focus onproduct design and feasibility. When team member strengths and weaknesses, work ethic, andcommunication expectations
teaching practices, and the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learn- ing and success. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Factors influencing conceptual understanding in a signals and systems courseAbstractPrevious studies show that many engineering undergraduates lack conceptual understanding ofsignals and systems. Although there is evidence that teaching style impacts conceptualunderstanding, there are few studies
programming interface (API).We developed a python script that connects to YouTube through the site’s API and searches forall the videos that belong to various computer science topics and targets audiences of varying agegroups. The topics include educational videos on computer ethics, data structures, virtual reality,calculus, linear algebra, and biocomputing. The educational videos target various age groups.The search resulted in a collection of 2550 videos. The goal of the search was to find educationalvideos relevant to these topics in computer science. However, it was possible to retrieve somevideos that were not relevant to the intended search queries. Such videos are called falsepositives and were manually removed from the collection. Following
), Candy Crush (2013), and League of Legends (2015) 34 . Award winningeducational games at the Game4Change Festival during this time included Reach for the Sun(Science), Mission US: A Cheyenee Odyssey (American History), and Quandary (Ethics) 35 . Theterm gamification was spreading in academia and industry and, for the first time, overtook theterm game-based learning in the corpus of US books (i.e., Google Ngram 36 ). The NationalResearch Council (NRC) published Learning Science through Computer Games and Simulations(2011), stating that ”evidence for the effectiveness of games for supporting science learning isemerging but is currently inconclusive. To date, the research base is very limited” (p.54).Although the NRC report included many
the course or finding excellent supplemental materialwhich gets added to the course. Encouragement badges were awarded for accessing the flashcards or attending office hours; repeating these behaviors earned higher levels of the badges.Three times over the semester students are required to write something: an ethics response onday 01, written instructions for using the right-hand-rule for three-dimensional moments on day15, and a project report on day 40. Some students believe that becoming an engineer means theynever have to write anything again; while assigning writing assignments can disabuse them ofthis notion, we hoped that assigning badges would highlight some of the places where engineersuse writing skills. The writing badges also have
Management from IAU, and Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering/Surveying from University of Tehran. Prior to joining The Citadel, he was a Visiting Professor of Construction Management in the Moss School of Construction, Infrastructure, and Sustainability at FIU. Dr. Batouli teaches diverse range of courses in civil engineering, construction engineering, and construction/project management. As a teacher, he aims to inspire his students to think intensively and critically and to live ethically and morally. Dr. Batouli’s major area of research is system-of-systems analysis of sustainability and resilience in civil infrastructure. He is particularly interested in studying human-infrastructure-environment interactions
these differences are irreconcilable,thoughts of leaving may occur [27]. Individuals make decisions based on a screening processthat utilizes specific threshold criteria held in their images for work, family, friends, recreation,ethics/spirituality (for additional details on image theory refer to Beach [45] and Lee & Mitchell[39]. Because this screening process centers around the violation of fit [46], subsuming relevantconcepts from person-environment fit theories into the unfolding model of turnover is warranted.However, I elaborate on aspects of this theory here to further explicate the direct contributions ofthe person-environment fit later.Person-Environment Fit TheoryPerson-environment fit theories assume people seek out and create
one sability to contribute to the level of their talent is an ethical and professional responsibility to thefield.This paper shares some early results from our broader NSF-funded project, titled Identif ingMarginalization and Allying Tendencies to Transform Engineering Relationships, or I-MATTER. The project s research questions are: 1. What does marginalization look like within engineering classrooms where teamwork is a primary feature? 2. How is marginalization legible (or not) to instructors at the classroom level? 3. What are the different ways that instructors respond to incidents of peer-to-peer marginalization? 4. How might the lessons of this work be implemented to systematically alert instructors when
ethics, and implicit bias. Students constantly replied to other’s posts and shared knowledge among themselves on the board. This was a common, but intentional practice. 5. Created a dedicated Microsoft TEAMS site for all senior design teams to communicate virtually. This was a common practice, but more important during the virtual quarter. 6. Met with each team throughout the quarter to identify any changes in team dynamics. The educator asked “how are you doing” each time. 7. Used the "Inclusivity Meter" to check in with students weekly, which provided an avenue for students to reflect and voice their concerns using an