Accreditation Council Training Committee. He was previously a Member-At-Large on the Computing Accreditation Commis- sion Executive Committee and a Program Evaluator for both computer engineering and computer science. Estell is well-known for his significant contributions on streamlining student outcomes assessment pro- cesses and has been an invited presenter at the ABET Symposium on multiple occasions. He was named an ABET Fellow in 2021. Estell is also a founding member and current Vice President of The Pledge of the Computing Professional, an organization dedicated to the promotion of ethics in the computing professions. Estell is Professor of Computer Engineering and Computer Science at Ohio Northern University
Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor (emerita) of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford Univer- sity. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 The Nexus of Entrepreneurship and Innovation–a new construct for looking at the creative contributions of engineering graduatesABSTRACTEngineers are called upon to possess strong analytical and communication skills, exhibitpractical ingenuity, and be creative thinkers, all the while upholding high ethical standards. Inmore recent times they are also expected to be innovative and
evaluators have access to individual responses. Reassure that reports on the COI will only include aggregated responses and non- identifiable comments. Assurance and trust have to be there or participants, especially those who feel identifiable, will not respond or will put “prefer not to answer” on the demographic variables of interest. Surveys have to follow ethical guidelines. Step 3. Top-down Support Have the Center director send a Center-wide email about the importance of completing the survey prior to deploying it, and then a reminder to complete the survey closer to the deadline. Make it clear in the latter email that the director does not have access to who completes the survey or to the individual level data
: • Ethical responsibilities • Economic benefits • Health and Safety • Societal context • Environmental • Global effects • Detailed Design were addressed as applicable (As driven by type & nature of the design project) Systems Diagram (Interfacing, power, signals) Materials/Mechanical System Manufacturing & Process Planning System Simulation / Industrial System Thermal System Electrical System Computer System
consider the ethical and practical considerations involved in working with real data. This principle aligns with the constructivist • Design assignments and projects that require students to apply their knowledge learning theory, which posits that people learn and skills to real-world problems or scenarios [Apache Spark and Hadoop] best when they are actively involved in • Encourage students to take an interdisciplinary approach to problem-solving,(c). Incorporate case constructing their own understanding of new incorporating
4COMM 1315 Public Speaking 3 TOTAL 15 TOTAL 15 SECOND YEARINEN 2373 Engineering Economics 3 INEN 3380 Work Design 3INEN 3322 Engr. Matls. & Procs. 3 ELEN 3310 Fundamentals of EE 3CVEN / MEEN 2301 Statics 3 MATH 3301 Diff. Eq. 3MATH 2318 Linear Algebra 3 Creative Arts Elective 3PHYS 2426 Physics II 4 PHIL 2306 Ethics 3 TOTAL 16
. H. Jan Reed, Appreciative Inquiry: Research for Action in Handbook of Research on Information Technology Management and Clinical Data Administration in Healthcare, Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2009, pp. 631-645.[20] J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, 1991.[21] A. Bandura, "Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency," American Psychologist, vol. 37, no. 2, p. 122–147, 1982.[22] E. Wenger, "Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity," Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.[23] M. C. Loui, "Ethics and the Development of Professional Identities of Engineering Students," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 383-390, 2005
-likeresponsibilities such as attending class, grading key assignments like visual aids, running studenthelp sessions, and performing their own presentations as examples. The student mentors arerecommended by instructors based on exemplary work ethic that was demonstrated as a studentof the course. They receive payment as employees of the university. Student mentors are acritical part of the course as they provide a student point of view. Through this experience, thestudent mentors continue to develop more communication skills through mentorships.Lead Instructor Another way of managing quality across sections is the investment in and appointment ofa lead instructor who acts as a liaison between the Communication Arts and SciencesDepartment and the
assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, nonverbal communication in the classroom, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a significant number of journal articles and book chapters on these topics. Dr. Barry is the 2020 recipient of ASEE’s National Outstanding Teaching Award.Dr. Rebecca Zifchock, United States Military Academy Dr. Rebecca Zifchock joined the faculty at the United States Military Academy in 2010 after receiving her bachelor’s degree in Biological and Mechanical Engineering at Cornell University, and master’s and Ph.D. degrees in Biomechanics at the Pennsylvania State University and the University of Delaware
State University- San Luis Obispo.Emily Flores Emily Flores is an undergraduate student studying Liberal Arts and Engineering Studies concentrating in Computer Science and Interdisciplinary Studies at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. She believes in coding ethically and ensuring that the products of our knowledge create a positive impact for all communities.Dr. Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jane Lehr is a Professor in Ethnic Studies and Women’s & Gender Studies and Director of Student Re- search at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. She is affiliated faculty in Computer Science and Software Engineering and Science
. 159, 1977, doi: 10.2307/2529310.[35] J. L. Hess, J. Strobel, and A. O. Brightman, “The Development of Empathic Perspective- Taking in an Engineering Ethics Course,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 534–563, 2017, doi: 10.1002/jee.20175.[36] C. D. Batson, S. Early, and G. Salvarani, “Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel,” Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 751–758, Jul. 1997, doi: 10.1177/0146167297237008.[37] M. H. Davis et al., “Cognitions associated with attempts to empathize: How do we imagine the perspective of another?,” Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull., vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1625–1635, 2004, doi: 10.1177/0146167204271183.[38] M. H
. Waymo reported of 20 million miles of autonomousdriving at the beginning of 2020. Many Other non-traditional automobile companies such asAmazon, Apple, Aptiv, Baidu, Nvidia, Uber are competing with traditional automakers such asAudi, Honda, GM, Huawei, Mercedez-Benz, etc. for the market share [35]. The success for autonomous cars involves smart technology involves digital map, highlyreliable and accurate sensing technology for connected systems, powerful computing, machinelearning among others. Some of the other major issues besides the autonomous drivingtechnology are consumer privacy, cybersecurity, safety regulation, ethical issues, which need tobe resolved in order to develop autonomous vehicles as a consumer product [36]. Making
Paper ID #33346The International Engagement of Engineering Education in China: AHistorical Case Study of Tsinghua UniversityZheping Xie, Tsinghua UniversityDr. Xiaofeng Tang, Tsinghua University Xiaofeng Tang is Associate Professor in the Institute of Education at Tsinghua University. Prior to his current position, Dr. Tang worked as an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineer- ing Education at The Ohio State University. He did postdoctoral research in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received his Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Prof. Fujun Jin
success of the project. For example, Robert originally did not evaluate eachindividual’s strengths and instead assigned each person parts without a specific direction. Helater found that the roles had to be redistributed because group members did not know how to dotheir parts, so the tasks were then divided by strengths and were more successfully completed.Similarly, Stanley noted that when delegating tasks for their virtual team project, pairing teammembers with tasks that fit their major helped in keeping the project going smoothly by havingcomputer science majors complete the website and the mechanical engineering majors focus onproduct design and feasibility. When team member strengths and weaknesses, work ethic, andcommunication expectations
teaching practices, and the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learn- ing and success. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Factors influencing conceptual understanding in a signals and systems courseAbstractPrevious studies show that many engineering undergraduates lack conceptual understanding ofsignals and systems. Although there is evidence that teaching style impacts conceptualunderstanding, there are few studies
programming interface (API).We developed a python script that connects to YouTube through the site’s API and searches forall the videos that belong to various computer science topics and targets audiences of varying agegroups. The topics include educational videos on computer ethics, data structures, virtual reality,calculus, linear algebra, and biocomputing. The educational videos target various age groups.The search resulted in a collection of 2550 videos. The goal of the search was to find educationalvideos relevant to these topics in computer science. However, it was possible to retrieve somevideos that were not relevant to the intended search queries. Such videos are called falsepositives and were manually removed from the collection. Following
), Candy Crush (2013), and League of Legends (2015) 34 . Award winningeducational games at the Game4Change Festival during this time included Reach for the Sun(Science), Mission US: A Cheyenee Odyssey (American History), and Quandary (Ethics) 35 . Theterm gamification was spreading in academia and industry and, for the first time, overtook theterm game-based learning in the corpus of US books (i.e., Google Ngram 36 ). The NationalResearch Council (NRC) published Learning Science through Computer Games and Simulations(2011), stating that ”evidence for the effectiveness of games for supporting science learning isemerging but is currently inconclusive. To date, the research base is very limited” (p.54).Although the NRC report included many
the course or finding excellent supplemental materialwhich gets added to the course. Encouragement badges were awarded for accessing the flashcards or attending office hours; repeating these behaviors earned higher levels of the badges.Three times over the semester students are required to write something: an ethics response onday 01, written instructions for using the right-hand-rule for three-dimensional moments on day15, and a project report on day 40. Some students believe that becoming an engineer means theynever have to write anything again; while assigning writing assignments can disabuse them ofthis notion, we hoped that assigning badges would highlight some of the places where engineersuse writing skills. The writing badges also have
Management from IAU, and Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering/Surveying from University of Tehran. Prior to joining The Citadel, he was a Visiting Professor of Construction Management in the Moss School of Construction, Infrastructure, and Sustainability at FIU. Dr. Batouli teaches diverse range of courses in civil engineering, construction engineering, and construction/project management. As a teacher, he aims to inspire his students to think intensively and critically and to live ethically and morally. Dr. Batouli’s major area of research is system-of-systems analysis of sustainability and resilience in civil infrastructure. He is particularly interested in studying human-infrastructure-environment interactions
these differences are irreconcilable,thoughts of leaving may occur [27]. Individuals make decisions based on a screening processthat utilizes specific threshold criteria held in their images for work, family, friends, recreation,ethics/spirituality (for additional details on image theory refer to Beach [45] and Lee & Mitchell[39]. Because this screening process centers around the violation of fit [46], subsuming relevantconcepts from person-environment fit theories into the unfolding model of turnover is warranted.However, I elaborate on aspects of this theory here to further explicate the direct contributions ofthe person-environment fit later.Person-Environment Fit TheoryPerson-environment fit theories assume people seek out and create
one sability to contribute to the level of their talent is an ethical and professional responsibility to thefield.This paper shares some early results from our broader NSF-funded project, titled Identif ingMarginalization and Allying Tendencies to Transform Engineering Relationships, or I-MATTER. The project s research questions are: 1. What does marginalization look like within engineering classrooms where teamwork is a primary feature? 2. How is marginalization legible (or not) to instructors at the classroom level? 3. What are the different ways that instructors respond to incidents of peer-to-peer marginalization? 4. How might the lessons of this work be implemented to systematically alert instructors when
ethics, and implicit bias. Students constantly replied to other’s posts and shared knowledge among themselves on the board. This was a common, but intentional practice. 5. Created a dedicated Microsoft TEAMS site for all senior design teams to communicate virtually. This was a common practice, but more important during the virtual quarter. 6. Met with each team throughout the quarter to identify any changes in team dynamics. The educator asked “how are you doing” each time. 7. Used the "Inclusivity Meter" to check in with students weekly, which provided an avenue for students to reflect and voice their concerns using an
applied in both academic and non-academic settings.For example, the rubric development presentation covers how rubrics can be used to as-sess exams, homework, and quizzes as well as to conduct an employee’s annual review. Adean from the college of engineering gives instruction on enforcing academic integrity, andour research park and alumni network has provided panelists for panel discussions wherequestions about professional ethics are deliberated.Perhaps the single best practice that we employed was holding a weekly meeting to conductlecture reflection and planning. In these meetings we perform regular checks on our lecturecontent to ensure that we do not lose sight of the integrative approach. The culture of theteam is one that allows
be compared to the pre- and post-data from priorsemesters, in a disaggregated fashion, to gain insight into the efficacy of pedagogicalshifts, content substitutions, and other deployed changes.Table 3: Engineering Design Ability Survey Category Survey Items Overall Design ● I can implement a design process to solve engineering problems. Process ● I can solve open-ended and ill-structured engineering problems. ● I can assess design decisions according to a code of ethics. ● I can recognize when it is necessary to revisit design activities to improve a solution. Design Phases ● Empathize: ○ I
industrial partners such asACUA (Atlantic County Utilities Authority), and ExxonMobil. Figure 1 illustrates ourundergraduate curriculum and highlights the clinic programs in purple borders. The first year andsophomore year engineering clinics focus on fundamental engineering skills and include diversetopics such as creative and scientific writing, technical presentation, convergent thinking,problem-solving, product development, ethics, engineering design, and statistics. For theJunior/Senior year the students choose their discipline-specific clinics depending on theircuriosity and area of interest Building on the foundation of PSE and Design Thinking, theProcess Dynamics & Control course and the two elective courses: Process Optimization
skills. Incorporating leadership in an engineeringcurriculum is not easy, but programs should realize the benefits of coordination with facultyacross the curriculum and nesting assessment with the goals of the institution. Leadershipdevelopment at The Citadel, where students and faculty are involved, is successful due to sharedgoals to improve and collaborate.References[1] The Krause Center for leadership and Ethics, https://krausecenter.citadel.edu/, accessed 21 May 2021.[2] U.S. Army, Military Leadership. FM 22-100. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1983.[3] U.S. Army, Army Leadership and the Profession, ADP 6-22. Washington, DC: Army Publishing Directorate, 2019.[4] U.S. Air Force, Air Force
calculus,and/or one or more electives. Therefore, this study focuses not only the learning approaches andstrategies that these students use in our one-semester introductory engineering course, but in allof their courses.The learning objectives for the one-semester version of the introductory engineering sequenceare as follows: 1. Use guided design methodologies to analyze engineering problems in order to achieve an optimal solution. 2. Identify and analyze holistic issues that impact engineering solutions, e.g., ethical implications, stakeholder needs and interests, and constraints. 3. Collect and analyze data and information to support/inform engineering decisions. 4. Use mathematical, graphical, and physical models
administration of the Global Perspective Inventory (GPI)?Literature reviewThe NAE report on Educating the Engineer of 2020 states that the engineering graduates shouldbe “technically proficient engineers who are broadly educated, see themselves as global citizens,can be leaders in business and public service, and who are ethically grounded [5].” Most of theprograms that aim to teach cultural intelligence to engineering students opt for some form ofinternational travel, despite the challenges that it represents [4]. Although most of theseprograms do not focus solely on global engineering practices, they present unique learningopportunities that allow engineering students to experience some of the global challenges ahead.When properly conceived and
College (1988) and holds a PhD in developmental psychology from Teachers College, Columbia University (1999). American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Observing empathy in informal engineering activities with girls ages 7-14 (RTP, Diversity)BackgroundResearch and policy shifts in engineering education have identified socioemotional skills likeempathy as a fundamental and often neglected part of engineering practice [1]-[2]. This workargues that solving complex engineering challenges with societal and ethical implicationsrequires engineers to empathize with clients and colleagues whose perspectives and needs mightdiffer from their own [1]-[4]. Humanistic
virtual conference (one participant also participated in a second online conference that was directly relevant to his research topic). • Online video games and puzzles, identified by participants. • Online virtual tours using Google Maps and other websites, identified by participants. • Playing the Black Hills Information Security’s Backdoors and Breaches game using a document camera through Microsoft Teams. • Remote presentation from a researcher at NASA JPLAdditionally, times were arranged for cohort members to briefly present their research topics andprogress to others in the cohort and to discuss what they had learned about researchmethodologies and techniques. A newly developed program on research ethics and