[22]. During World War II (1939-45),women engaged in roles that were previously exclusive to males although women did not benefitequally [34]. The 1960’s and 1970’s led to the creation of law and programs to promote equityand challenge gender-related disparities including the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the Title IX of theEducation Amendments Act of 1972, and the Women’s Educational Equity Act of 1974 to namea few. Nonetheless, these women scientists continued to bring “modest but essential change tohigher education in the years 1972-1985” [35, p. 39].In the Nineteenth and Twentieth century, women studying or working in engineering wereperceived as outcasts. The first women pursuing engineering were labeled as “others”; a smallthreatening group of
marginalized populations. A potentiallimitation of this study involves the first author having relationships with most of theparticipants. It will be interesting to replicate the study with participants who are unknown to thefirst author. Those participants might be less willing to be interrogated and challenged.References[1] S. Stokes, Into the Wildfire: Campus Racial Climate and the Trump Presidency (Doctoral dissertation, 2020, University of Southern California).[2] S. R. Harper, An anti‐deficit achievement framework for research on students of color in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2010, (148), 63-74.[3] Z. W. Taylor, A sage on two stages: What a Black academic taught a white scholar about cross-cultural mentoring. Texas
, “Drawing on experience: Connecting art and language/bridging the theme,” Primary Voices K-6, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 2, 2001. [3] R. M. Yasin, L. Halim, and A. Ishar, “Effects of problem-solving strategies in the teaching and learning of engineering drawing subject,” Asian Social Science, vol. 8, no. 16, p. 65, 2012. [4] S. A. Sorby, “Educational research in developing 3-d spatial skills for engineering students,” International Jour- nal of Science Education, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 459–480, 2009. [5] J. M. Lakin and J. Wai, “Spatially gifted, academically inconvenienced: Spatially talented students experience less academic engagement and more behavioural issues than other talented students,” British Journal of Educa- tional Psychology
University Jana L. Bouwma-Gearhart is an associate professor of STEM education at Oregon State University. Her research widely concerns improving education at research universities. Her earlier research explored en- hancements to faculty motivation to improve undergraduate education. Her more recent research concerns organizational change towards postsecondary STEM education improvement at research universities, in- cluding the interactions of levers (people, organizations, policy, initiatives) of change and documenting the good, hard work required across disciplinary boundaries to achieve meaningful change in STEM ed- ucation.Dr. Louis S. Nadelson, University of Central Arkansas Louis S. Nadelson has a BS
kits withportability, and the students can use such lab kits in multiple courses throughout theirundergraduate study.Digilent offers a BNC adaptor for the AD2 to allow the usage of BNC cables for signal input andoscilloscope probes for monitoring signals while preserving the bandwidth. It is important tonote that this feature is in addition to the built-in 2-channel function generator and the virtual 2-channel oscilloscope of the AD2. AD2, M2K, and OSMZ all share identical flywire interfaces(the pinout maps are also almost the same except the pins that differ in functionality. Forexample, the AD2’s waveform-2 pin is a clock pin on the OSMZ board as the OSMZ board doesnot provide a second function generator channel). Therefore, the BNC adaptor
decision treeand separate the sample into mutually exclusive nodes which share common attributes.Attributes of nodes with a high proportion of students overpersisting will be used to identifycurrently enrolled students at risk of overpersisting. The variables used to make thesedeterminations can be categorical or continuous. In addition to traditional demographic variables,the variables currently under consideration are listed in Table 1.Table 1. Predictor variables computed for CHAID analysis Variable(s) Description first.term.hours Number of credit hours attempted in student’s first term first.major & last.major Majors enrolled in during the student’s first and last terms grad.major
can be evaluated in terms of t effectiveness ascompared to the other capstone courses to inform changes can be made to the Global Capstone.Citations(1 )Chubin, D. E., May, G. S., & Babco, E. L. (2005). Diversifying the Engineering Workforce. Journal ofEngineering Education, 94(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2005.tb00830.x(2) De Graaff, E., & Ravesteijn, W. (2001). Training complete engineers: Global enterprise andengineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 26(4), 419–427.https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790110068701(3) Jesiek, Zhu, Q., Woo, S. E., Thompson, J., & Mazzurco, A. (2014). Global Engineering Competency inContext: Situations and Behaviors. 16.(4) Lucena, J., Downey, G., Jesiek, B., &
“disseminationparadigm” in contrast to the “propagation paradigm” [6]. The dissemination paradigm is the ideathat “if we build it, they will come,” meaning that developers acting in this paradigm believe thatdesigning evidence-supported pedagogical innovations and presenting the results at conferencesand in journal articles will result in adoption. However, the data suggest that this is not the case[7], [8]. On the other hand, the propagation paradigm involves developers working with potentialadopters throughout the development process to create innovations that meet the needs of a widerange of engineering educators, thus providing motivation and opportunity for sustainedadoption. Using Froyd et al.’s [6] paradigms as two ends of a spectrum, we can capture a
testing and regression testingDeliverable 3 Update test design plan, and perform continuous integration testing and regression testingDeliverable 4 Complete the test design plan and perform system testingNote that developing and testing the same project sometimes involved changing requirements; onthe other hand, testing the same project did not involve changing requirements, thereby making thetesting process a lot easier.4.3 Sample ProjectsThis section summarizes some of the group projects used for testing in CEN4072 in 2016, 2017,2019, and 2020. The summary includes the semester (year) the project was done, the project name,a short description of the project, the language(s) used, and development and testing tools used. In2016 and 2020, the
-of-products or product-of-sums form leads to he m ec n mical im lemen a i n, he de igne in he final im lemen a i n i n n-existent. In the ultimate insult to a digital designer, it is even possible to simply input the truthtable of the desired function(s) and the software will determine the optimal implementation.Where is the design effort to be assessed?In current CPLD implementations, the flip-flop in each macrocell can be implemented as either aD- or a T-type flip-flop. The configuration software decides which flip-flop type yields the bestresult, not the circuit designer. If the designer specifies the less-optimal type, the software will Proceedings of the 2011 North Midwest Section
, S = Energy and Sustainability,No = not observed)Code Definition CourseMastery Competence, proficiency in understanding and applying No knowledgeBroader context Understanding of the subject’s societal implications F, E, SEngagement active Student involvement in learning F, E, S learningEthical Ability to identify ethical issues and decide on ethical actions F, E, S developmentRelatedness Feeling of belonging and support in the learning setting F, ESystems thinking Ability to see connections and see the whole instead
achieve thesame research objective(s). In the fourth year, all the REU participants worked in group projectsetting. In addition, each group of REU participants was required to complete a group projectreport discussing the social impacts of their research projects. In both individual project andgroup project settings, REU participants were provided ample opportunities to share theirresearch progress through formal and informal presentations in order to enhance REUparticipants’ understanding and broaden their perspective of energy systems challenges. Inaddition, each REU participant was required to submit an individual final research project report,in order to highlight their findings through an individual poster presentation and give anindividual
to one another during the career decision-making process(Lent et al., 1994). SCCT served as the basis of the interview protocol administered in this study,the deductive data analysis process, and in considering the implications of the study.Figure 1Social Cognitive Career TheoryNote. From “Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest,Choice, and Performance,” by R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, and G. Hackett, 1994, Journal ofVocational Behavior, 45, pp. 79-122.MethodologyResearch design. An embedded, multiple-case study design (Yin, 2018) was utilized to explorethe ways in which 22 engineering postdoctoral scholars describe the appeal of pursuing a careerin the professoriate. Interviews, grounded by SCCT (Lent et al
for EAC programs) and CETAA (CommitteeTelecommunication(s) for ETAC programs) committee meetings.INCOSE, Systems No Still working on initial criteria requirementsSNAME, Naval Architecture and Feedback from program heads and discussion No Yes Ad hocMarine Engineering among society reps. Any changes to Program Criteria have beenSPIE, Optical and
also by generating some turnover among the participants.In the long run the successful implementation of the cooperation will result in increasinginterest of local pupils to study engineering at LUT University. However, it will take a longtime before the full potential of the cooperation is in use, and therefore these other indicatorsof the effectiveness of the activities must be systematically developed and applied.References[1] H. Kirschenbaum & C. Reagan, “University and urban school partnerships. An analysis of57 collaborations between university and a city school district,” Urban Educ. vol. 36, no. 4,pp. 479–504, Sep. 2001, doi:10.1177/0042085901364003[2] S. Sjøberg & C. Schreiner, “The ROSE project. An overview and key findings
of Applied Social Research, Columbia University, 1964. [3] J. Harp and P. Taietz, “Academic Integrity and Social Structure: A Study of Cheating among College Students,” Oxford Univ. Press. Soc. Study Soc. Probl., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 365–373, 1966. [4] D. L. McCabe, “Classroom Cheating Among Natural Science and Engineering Majors,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 433–445, 1997. [5] D. D. Carpenter, T. S. Harding, C. J. Finelli, S. M. Montgomery, and H. J. Passow, “Engineering Students’ Perceptions of and Attitudes Towards Cheating,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 181–194, Jul. 2006. [6] H. J. Passow, M. J. Mayhew, C. J. Finelli, T. S. Harding, and D. D. Carpenter, “Factors
student assignments and be used the following year to assess how students connectchemical engineering outside of the classroom. In addition, we hope that the increase in samplesize will show more distinct differences amongst the groups.References 1. Zappe, S., & Leicht, R., & Messner, J., & Litzinger, T., & Lee, H. W. (2009, June), “Flipping” The Classroom To Explore Active Learning In A Large Undergraduate Course Paper presented at 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/4545 2. Bays-Muchmore, M. F., & Chronopoulou, A. (2018, June), First-Year Engineering Students Perceptions of Engineering Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
-Colleges-Are- Best- and/245758?cid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en&elqTrackId=61c76ff393544f33916 cdf7efa62f902&elq=1228defe891449bf8337f489863032f4&elqaid=22356&elqat=1&elqC ampaignId=110123. Burgher, J.K., D. M. Finkel, B. J. Van Wie, and O. O. Adesope, "Implementing and Assessing Interactive Physical Models in the Fluid Mechanics Classroom," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 2501–2516, 2016.4. Hunsu, N.J., O. Adesope, and B.J. Van Wie, “Engendering situational interest through innovative instruction in an engineering classroom: what really mattered?” Instructional Science, vol. 45, pp. 789-804, 2017.5. Liu C., C. Chen, S. Chen, T. Tsai, C. Chu, C
pedagogical underpinnings of Active Learning in Engineering Education,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 5– 16, 2017.[3] E. J. H. Spelt, P. A. Luning, M. A. J. S. van Boekel, and M. Mulder, “A multidimensional approach to examine student interdisciplinary learning in science and engineering in higher education,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 761– 774, 2017.[4] D. Gerrard and C. Variawa, “Bridges and barriers: A multi-year study of workload- related learning experiences from diverse student and instructor perspectives in first- year engineering education,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2018.[5] T. Geyer and W. R. Loendorf, “Handling increased faculty and student workload
could incorporate the algorithms coursework to develop a massively multiplayer networkbased game.References[1] “Occupational Outlook Handbook: Software Developers Job Outlook”, Bureau of LaborStatistics, Sept. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/software-developers.htm#tab-6 [Accessed Jan., 2020][2] Ashok R. Basawapatna, Kyu Han Koh, and Alexander Repenning. “Using scalable gamedesign to teach computer science from middle school to graduate school,” In Proceedings of thefifteenth annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education.(ITiCSE ’10) Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2010, pp. 224–228.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1822090.1822154[3] S
Professoriate, vol. 3, 2010.[10] C. M. Lewis, N. Shah, and K. Falkner, “Equity and Diversity,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research, Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 481–510.[11] G. Rulifson and A. Bielefeldt, “Health stress and support system narratives of engineering students,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, 2020.[12] C. M. Vogt, “Faculty as a critical juncture in student retention and performance in engineering programs,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 27–36, 2008.[13] S. E. Walden, D. A. Trytten, and R. L. Shehab, “Research-based recommendations for creating an inclusive culture for diversity and equity in engineering education,” in 2018
first-year students programmingcurriculum. The Arduino Uno was the chosen microcontroller since the platform is excellent forteaching basic circuitry and programming, such as having easily accessible digital and analoginput/output ports.ENGR 111 uses a scaffolded set of lessons to introduce circuitry, programming an Arduino, andinterfacing between an Arduino and circuits. These lessons start with basic circuits usingbreadboards, basic components, and wires. Programming the Arduino is the next set of lessons,and these lessons focus on basic programming concepts and how to interact with the Arduino.Finally, there is a series of lessons that help the students create circuit(s) and program(s) thatinteract with each other.Although the ENGR 111
willobserve and complement that material with a twenty-minute presentation that relates the focalconcept to an industry problem and application. In parallel, the project team and industrymentors will work on up-to-date application-based problems/projects to be implemented in thecourse instructor's homework and assignment(s). The project team will also work with safetyprofessionals to blend essential topics like process safety, risk management, and environmentalimpact into the targeted course.Figure 1. Schematic of constituent relations of different approaches. Interpersonal andintrapersonal skills are labeled as professional skills.We hypothesize that the “Synergistic Approach” will engage students in a new and compellingmanner, introducing them to
] Johnson, C. M., “A survey of current research on online communities of practice,” InternetHigh Educ, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 45-60, March, 2001.[4] Wenger. E, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 318.[5] Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. S., Sutton, M. M., Mantel, S. J. Jr., Project Management in Practice (4th ed.). New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 2010. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceDr. Ann M Gansemer-Topf, Iowa State UniversityAnn Gansemer-Topf is an Associate Professor in Higher Education and Student Affairs, andFaculty Fellow in the Center for Excellence in Learning
-YearEngineering Students” 126th ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. Tampa, Florida, June 15-192019.[6] J.K. Morgan, “Examination of the Development of Grit in First-Year Engineering Students”10th FYEE Annual Conference Proceedings. Glassboro, New Jersey, July 24-26 2018.[7] A. L. Duckworth, C. Peterson, M. D. Matthews, and D. R. Kelly, “Grit: Perseverance andPassion for Long-Term Goals,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 92, no. 6, pp.1087-1101, 2007.[8] E. S. Elliott and C. S. Dweck, “Goals: An Approach to Motivation and Achievement,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 5-12, 1988.[9] M. C. Murphy and C. S. Dweck, “A Culture of Genius: How an Organization’s Lay TheoryShapes People’s Cognition, Affect, and
teaches various mechanical engineer- ing courses e.g. Engineering Mechanics, System Dynamics and Controls. His teaching philosophy is to promote instinctive/inherent understanding of engineering concepts, and productive student-faculty inter- actions. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Efficacy of teaching entrepreneurial mindset using a game-like activity Dr. Anoop S. Grewal, Layla Reitmeier Arizona State UniversityAbstractWe developed, 'Thank You for Your Service' (TY4YS), a web-browser based, game-like activityas a way to introduce and reinforce the entrepreneurial mindset (EM) for
learning by editingand re-editing. This opportunity to do technical writing in a language other than his nativelanguage seemed to be an aspect that he appreciated as it improved his written English.Bibliography1. J T. Black, R. Kohser. DeGarmo’s Materials and Processes in Manufacturing, 11 th edition. John Wiley and Sons. p. 529.2. S. S Crump. Rapid Prototyping Using FDM, Modern Casting, 1992, 82(4), p 36-383. The Plastic Industry Trade Association, Definitions of Resins - Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene (ABS), Retrieved by http://www.plasticsindustry.org/aboutplastics/content.cfm?itemnumber=1384&navitemnumber=1128 379 4. R. Quintana, J
of the Maa Trust and Josephine Miliza of the Internet Society in Kenya.References:[1] https://www.ewb-usa.org/mission-and-history/ (Accessed February 24, 2021)[2] J.P. Delplanque, J. Gosink, and J. Lucena, “Initiating a Program on HumanitarianEngineering: Rationale, Implementation, Problems and Perceptions”, Procs. 2004 ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT[3] D. Budny, S. Arjmand and D.V.P. Sanchez, “Comparison of student’ outcome to differenttypes of project based service learning experiences for CEE senior design”, Procs. 2016 ASEEAnnual Conference, New Orleans, LA June 2016[4] T. Thompson and L. D. Zavodney, “On providing engineering students with culturally-appropriate design experiences in developing countries