processingwill provide a quick way to start identifying these trends and relationships between assessmentscores and student reflections.References[1] J. A. Turns, B. Sattler, K. Yasuhara, J. L. Borgford-Parnell, and C. J. Atman, “Integrating reflection into engineering education,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2014.[2] S. A. Ambrose, “Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum: The Ultimate Design Challenge,” in The Bridge - Linking Engineering and Society, vol. 43, no. 2, 2013, pp. 16–23.[3] IBM, “What is natural language processing (NLP)?,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ibm.com/topics/natural-language-processing.[4] E. Cambria and B. White, “Jumping NLP curves: A review of natural language processing research,” IEEE Comput. Intell
Paper ID #11791Identifying Factors Impacting First Year Persistence in Computer GraphicsTechnologyMr. Eric Scott McCrae, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Eric McCrae is a senior graphic designer and web developer at Blue Octopus Printing Company, a large printing and mailing facility in Indianapolis, Indiana. He has over 17 years experience in the printing and mailing industry specializing in graphic design for print and mail marketing. Eric is the father of 1 and husband to Mia the love of his life.Dr. Eugenia Fernandez, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Eugenia Fernandez is an Associate
sensors, actuators, electronic components, and itsembedded digital control system. It includes simultaneous optimal design practice with respect tothe realization of the design specifications related to different engineering domains15.Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics Curriculum at Mechanical EngineeringTechnology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana The Mechanical Engineering Technology program of Engineering Technology at PurdueUniversity has concentrations in: 1) Automation and Systems Integration; 2) Mechatronics; and3) Robotics. These new areas of concentrations are available for students who are enrolled fromfall 2014 and on. Graduates of the mechatronics concentration will be able to apply embeddedcontrollers to
AC 2010-2211: A UNIQUE UNDERGRADUATE LABORATORY-BASED COURSEIN ENGINEERING FAILUREDavid Lanning, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical UniversityWahyu Lestari, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Dr. Wahyu Lestari is an Associate Professor in the Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Department of Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University at Prescott, ArizonaShirley Waterhouse, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Dr. Shirley Waterhouse is the Senior Director for Academic Excellence and Innovation, Office of the Chief Academic Officer, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, Florida. Page 15.109.1© American
for large classrooms and developing K-16 curriculum in earthquake engineering and spatial visualization.Prof. Nathan Delson, University of California at San Diego Nathan Delson is a Teaching Professor at the University of California at San Diego. His research inter- ests include robotics, biomedical devices, and engineering education. He teaches introductory design, mechanics, mechatronics, capstone design, medical devices, and product design & entrepreneurship. His interests in design education include increasing student motivation, teamwork, hands-on projects, and integration of theory into design projects. In 1999 he co-founded Coactive Drive Corporation (currently General Vibration), a company that provides
– Part II," in 126th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, 2019.[9] M. C. Lovett, "Making Exams Worth More Than the Grade," in Using Reflection and Metacognition to Improve Student Learning: Across the Disciplines, Across the Academy, Sterling, VA: Stylus, 2013, pp. 18-48.[10] C. S. Dweck, Mindset: The New Psychology of Success, New York, NY: Random House, 2006.[11] K. A. Sethares and M. E. Asselin, "Use of Exam Wrapper Metacognitive Strategy to Promote Student Self-Assessment of Learning: An Integrative Review," Nurse Educator, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 37-41, 2022.[12] M. S. Schuler and J. Chung, "Exam Wrapper Use and Metacognition in a Fundamentals Course: Perceptions
Engineering Education: Curriculum Innovation & Integration, Jan 1992, Santa Barbara, CA, pp.5-10.9. Agogino, A.M., et al., “Making Connections to Engineering During the First Two Years,” Frontiers in Education Toward 2000, IEEE, 1992, pp.563-569.10. Wood, K.L. et al., “Reverse Engineering and Redesign: Courses to Incrementally and Systematically Teach Design,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol.90, No.3, July 2001, pp.363-374.11. Gabrielle, G.A., “Employing Reverse Engineering Projects in a Capstone Design Course,” Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York.12. Marin, J.A., J.E. Armstrong, J.L. Kays, “Elements of an Optimal Capstone Design Experience,” Journal of
undergraduate engineering degrees, newlyentering the workforce. These data were collected as part of an ongoing research project at ourlab focused on women’s leadership development. This project is separate from Study 1, buthighly synergistic with our Study 1 interview data and have the added benefit (for thisconference paper) of being collected, by design, among early-career engineers. After describingour Study 2 sample and methods in this section, we integrate quotations and themes from Study2 into our results below–with a focus on if and how the voices and experiences of women inStudy 2 aligned with, called into question, and/or expanded our Study 1 dataset. Study 2findings are reported in Section 4.4, following Study 1 findings.Participants from
a sustainable development model for modernmanufacturing industries. Sustainable green manufacturing encompasses the design ofmanufacturing processes to prioritize energy conservation, pollution prevention orreduction, and increased health and safety of communities, employees, and consumers. Inthis paper, we will discuss key advanced technologies and environmental topics that canbe integrated into manufacturing coursework to include sustainability principles. Thiscourse has been taught, evaluated, and reviewed to identify barriers to the inclusion ofemerging issues into the course manufacturing materials.1. IntroductionMET 101 Manufacturing Materials is an undergraduate engineering course taken byfreshman level students in the Engineering
these traditional graphics courses have a strongbias towards Mechanical Engineering which often resulted in incomplete training for thegraduates1.In the last decade, many schools have integrated the feature-based, parametric solid modelingtechnology into the course curriculum. To encourage the integration, several solid modelingpackages, such as ProEngineer, SolidWorks, CATIA, and UniGraphics, are academically priced.Most books reacted to this technology by adding a chapter or two on this new technology. Somebooks primarily focused their attention on teaching the software with no consideration to the Page 13.1202.2theory. A disjoint approach to
museum to help it beginupdating its displays on recent developments in materials; junior fluids, junior circuits, seniormicroprocessor, senior design of machine elements, and senior capstone design are havingstudents design and build various parts of an automated canal lock opener for a local nationalpark. Many of the projects are low-cost and can be implemented by individual faculty memberswithout the requirement of a formal institutional program. These S-L projects are integrated intoa wide variety of core courses (and not just design courses) and represent typically from 10 to20% of the grade.IntroductionWe define service-learning as a hands-on learning approach in which students achieve academicobjectives in a credit-bearing course by
Paper ID #23209Engagement in Practice: Developing a Sustainable K-12 Outreach STEMProgramDr. Joan B. Schuman, Missouri University of Science & Technology Dr. Joan Schuman is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Engineering Management and Systems Engineering Department at Missouri S&T. She earned her Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from University of Arkansas and completed her Ph.D. in Polymer Science and Engineering from the University of Southern Mississippi. Schuman is a Project Management Professional (PMP) certified through the Project Management Institute. She worked for several years
, hopefully, inthe future to students in the Mechanical Engineering program.IntroductionElectrical Engineering (EE) programs across the United States have seen a decline in electricalpower engineering courses for the last few years 1. This same trend has been witnessed in the EEprogram at the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). At MSOE however, there is anincrease in interest in the power systems option among Architectural Engineering (AE) students.The driving force behind this interest is an increasing demand for graduates with a powersystems background for facilities engineering 2. A group of 25 local design firms and contractorsrecently approached MSOE and requested a sequence of courses that would prepare AE studentsfor a career in the
2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings Exploring the Potential Benefits and Risks of ChatGPT in Engineering Education Sinan Onal Department of Industrial Engineering Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville sonal@siue.eduAbstractThis paper examines the potential benefits and risks of using ChatGPT, an AI-powered chatbot developedby OpenAI, in engineering education by generating sample questions and answers and solving samplemathematical problems related to course subjects in the industrial engineering curriculum. The
). In an attempt to reduce thisjob-skills gap, the state has allocated funds to increase the number of Engineering B.S. degreesat the UW and WSU.The STARS program provides first-year students from low-income backgrounds an extra year ofacademic, financial, and social support to encourage retention in engineering. Students areselected for the STARS program if they show a strong interest in engineering, are highlymotivated, and are Pell-eligible and/or attended an under-resourced high school. STARSparticipants receive a targeted first year curriculum focused on advancing academic preparationin math and science, developing learning skills, broadening career awareness and vision, andconnecting with resources on campus; individualized academic
thisfield. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) now encouragesengineering departments to emphasize adding “professional skills” to their curriculum. Theseskills include communication, teamwork, ethics, and professionalism, to name a few.Course ProfessionalismAttendance in class is mandatory, as is punctuality. Since these traits are not optional in theworkplace, they are also strictly reinforced in this class in an attempt to introduce the students tothe rigors of being an engineer or construction manager. Since these skills are difficult toestablish on the first day of work, starting them off as first-year students is thought to be goodpreparation for their eventual careers.Reading the chapter of the week before coming to
in carrying out the experiment of thesituation worked on in class. Finally, students, working in groups, carry out theexperimentation and reflect on it at the end. This reflection occurs in their working groups.The modified ILD combines the theoretical class (mainly exposition by the instructor) withthe experimental class to offer students an integrative experience. This study involved 47students from two groups of a first-year university course in acoustical physics.Applying the modified ILD methodology, a qualitative study was conducted analyzing thestudents' responses to the guides and their conclusions. This study presents the results of theanalysis with a focus on determining the students' scientific skills in obtaining data
complicatedproblem of the two, a natural question to ask is why anyone would bother solving thesimpler problem analytically. This leads to a discussion of what information is availablefrom the analytical solution versus what is available from the numerical solution, theadvantages of an analytical solution, and under what circumstances one would seek anumerical solution. Finally, it leads to a point that is seldom appreciated when the threemain topics of this course are taught in a non-integrated manner - that the analyticalsolution of a simpler case can serve as a limiting case check of the numerical solution ofa more complex case. As simulations become more and more complex, students areencouraged to find ways to check their simulation results with
the course material, and in the design and delivery of the project itself. Forexample, in the earliest version students were introduced to the nature of problems (discerningthe difference between those of description, calculation, explanation and invention). In thecurrent version, there is greater focus on what specific questions need to fully understand andcomprehend the scope and nature of an engineering problem. It is a common element of mosthigh school science curriculums to focus the students on providing detailed solutions to aclearly defined problem. The critical skills of learning how to frame and comprehend a problemfrom primary sources such as end users, clients, society or management are not taught. Studentsneed to make sense of
on different laboratory techniqueswhere students do real experiments in different labs and write reports about their work.CP follows a fairly traditional US engineering curriculum. There are many different gradedassignments, particularly homework and midterms, in addition to the final exam (which isusually three hours long). Many courses at CP have an associated laboratory, and ofteninstructors will assign additional projects in the class. There is no requirement to do aninternship, although most students seek to do these during the summer break. There is asubstantial general education requirement, including 72 quarter credits. Page
students in thesecourses were also participating in Engineers Without Borders (EWB) as an extracurricularactivity. Based on the fall 2006 results, there were significant differences in the responses of thefirst-year versus senior design course for only 4 of the 61 questions. The fall 2007 EDWstudents were emailed the survey, and response rates were much lower than in the other twocourses. Therefore, few differences due to gender, EWB participation, or other factors wereevident. The results from this study are preliminary in nature due to the small number of surveyrespondents. However, at this time it appears that the curriculum made minimal impacts oncommunity service attitudes. It also appears that differences in the attitudes of thesenior
Core Curriculum cultivates social justice, civic life, perspective, andcivic engagement. It involves community-based learning with a social justice emphasis. Studentsare required to (i) engage in 16 hours of community-based learning experiences and (ii) performcritical reflection and evaluation of their experiences. A primary goal of the ELSJ requirement is“to foster a disciplined sensibility toward power and privilege, an understanding of the causes ofhuman suffering, and a sense of personal and civic responsibility for cultural change.”The specific learning objectives of an ELSJ class are as follows:• Recognize the benefits of life-long responsible citizenship and civic engagement in personal and professional activities (Civic Life
thedevelopment of the projects. The second program is the IDEAS Learning Community thatengages about 25 first-year students yearly in a one-semester partnership with an outreachprogram from Indianapolis, Indiana which is about an hour from campus. The central classcombines career exploration and integration into the university with discussions and experiencesaround diversity. The engagement with the outreach program provides a context and activitiesthat enhance the learning goals and provides experiences to bring the class together. Thedeliverables are activities for K12 students both at the outreach center and for an annual visit tocampus.EPICS ResultsEPICS is large and complex, with many stakeholders. We first examined the three commonstakeholders of
result, most groups worked with the first choice – a single degreeof freedom free vibration system. Many groups built their system using household items and variousinteresting forms were designed. The survey showed the project helped students grasp a betterunderstanding of real-life vibrations, which an engineer would have to put time into modeling variationsof said systems. One of the student projects was further developed as a demonstration of free and forcedvibration in the course. This paper presents the project students designed, the challenges they faced, andthe benefits they achieved from this project.I. Introduction and BackgroundEngineering is a practicable discipline, a hand-on profession where doing is the key [1]. Project
completed; and thecategories of the students’ institutions (e.g. research universities vs. teaching universities vs.community colleges).References[1] K. Baier, C. Hendricks, W. Gorden, J. E. Hendricks and L. Cochran, “College students'textbook reading, or not,” in American Reading Forum in Yearbook 31, pp. 385-402, 2011.[2] M. A. Clump, H. Bauer, and C. Bradley, “The extent to which psychology students readtextbooks: A multiple class analysis of reading across the psychology curriculum,” J. Instr.Psychol., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 227-232, 2004.[3] T. Berry, L. Cook, N. Hill, and K. Stevens. “An exploratory analysis of textbook usage andstudy habits: Misperceptions and barriers to success,” Coll. Teach., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 31-39,2010.[4] B. Skromme and
University, graduating in 2013. His re- search interests include veterans in engineering, veterans with service-connected disability, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and human sex trafficking.Dr. Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus SHAWN JORDAN, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of En- gineering at Arizona State University. He teaches context-centered electrical engineering and embedded systems design courses, and studies the use of context in both K-12 and undergraduate engineering design education. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2010) and M.S./B.S. in Electrical and Com- puter Engineering from Purdue University. Dr. Jordan is PI
background in English, philosophy, science, and all levels of education, Heather is currently a doc- toral student in curriculum and instruction and educational psychology. She is interested in psychological barriers affecting retention and success for students. Having been raised by an engineer, this project is close to her heart. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Promoting Inclusive Engineering Identities in First-Year Engineering CoursesIntroductionIn order to cultivate a diverse and inclusive engineering student population, engineeringprograms must purposefully teach engineering students to identify as engineers, appreciatediversity, and work
autonomy, empowerment, and affinity, whichprovide an add-value to one or both parties in the mentoring relationship.Mentorship in higher education most often adheres to traditional mentoring frameworks, whichare primarily concerned with mentor-driven mentee development and can be grouped into twofactions [22]: development through assimilation into institutional culture (this may occur byincreasing mentee involvement [23], [24], [25], facilitating mentee integration [26], [27], [28], andproviding the mentee with support and challenge [29], [30]) and development through emulatingthe mentor (which occurs by the mentor serving as a role model [31], [32], [33]). Traditionalmentoring frameworks assume that student mentees can only ever be impacted in
Paper ID #38406Experimental Self-Efficacy and Troubleshooting Ability in a ChemicalEngineering LaboratoryCaroline Crockett, University of Virginia Caroline Crockett is an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the School of Engi- neering and Applied Sciences at the University of Virginia. She received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Virginia and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Michigan. Her educational research interests include conceptual understanding of electrical engineering concepts and assessing the impact of curriculum changes.Dr. George Prpich
bepresented at the ASEE conference in June 2011 and published in a future paper.BackgroundIn the 1920s, less than a third of engineering educators considered the study of differentialequations to be necessary for an engineer’s education, now such study is integral to theengineering curriculum. In the engineering world of the future, a sound understanding of thetheoretical and practical sides of engineering ethics will be as necessary to the proper educationof engineers as a knowledge of differential equations is today, if not more so”.4Robin Tatu in her article “Knowledge Isn’t Enough” takes the famous quote from the Greekinventor Archimedes “Give me a place to stand and I will move the Earth” and argues that “thepotential to wield such power is