practice as a structural engineer and as an architect, with special expertise in historic preservation and archaic construction.Raul N. Tackie, Colorado School of Mines Raul Tackie is a Senior in Mechanical Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines, who is also pursuing a minor in Humanitarian Engineering. His interests include sustainable development, renewable energy, corporate social responsibility, and bio-mechanical engineering. As a student at Red Rocks Community College he helped develop the Introduction to Design and Engineering Applications course which to this day continues to introduce engineering and non-engineering students alike to engineering concepts and applications through the creation of real-world
Conference (FIE), Erie, PA, USA[5] A. Kemppainen, A. Hamlin, H. Diment, and A. Moya. "LEarning with academic partners (LEAP) Success and growing pains in the first year." 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 2017.[6] S. Hoyt, N. D. Theodore, and T. L. Alford. "Creating a Learning Community and Building Engagement in Online Engineering Courses Using Active Learning Instructional Practices and Edtech Tool", International Journal on Innovations in Online Education. 2020 Vol. 4. No. 1.
Hatcher, M. “Examining the impact of four teaching development programmes for engineering teaching assistants.” J. of Further and Higher Ed., 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1361517[6] Olarte, T. R., Swartz, M., and Roberts, S. A. “Mathematics graduate students’ teacher identity development: Examining roles within the teaching assistant position.” J. of Research in Sci., Math. and Tech. Ed., vol. 7, issue SI, pp. 117-139, 2024. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.316SI[7] Gardner, G. and Jones, M. G. “Pedagogical preparation of the science graduate teaching assistant: Challenges and implications.” Sci. Educator, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 31-41, 2011.[8] Borrelli, D. and Masten, S. “Empowering
AC 2009-173: MARKETING THE ENGINEERING LIBRARYMegan Sapp Nelson, Purdue University Page 14.862.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Marketing the Engineering LibraryAbstract:Marketing is a tool of librarianship that is infrequently taught to library professionals, yet playsan important role in outreach to students, faculty, and staff. This paper shows the process thatPurdue University’s Engineering Library faculty utilized to develop and implement a marketingplan. As the process evolved, an inventory of current programs, an analysis of current patronsand current marketing methods, an assessment of available marketing venues, a map ofmarketing
Hassenfeld Community Engagement Fellow and a Diversity and Inclusion Fellow at RWU. Her research focuses on offshore wind energy, oyster growth, community engagement, and engineering education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Teaching in the Era of COVID-19: A Reinvented Course Project for an Ocean Engineering CourseAbstractExperiential, team-based course projects, with an emphasis on designing and building physicalproducts, are increasingly being adopted across many engineering disciplines, including wide usein ocean engineering courses. COVID-19 presents new challenges to pedagogies that relyheavily on physical production and
discipline-specific groups. The next component was integrating the use of community building strategies in the SI Leaders’ lesson plans. Leaders create their lesson plans the week before conducting sessions and submit them to their graduate supervisor or SI Coordinator for feedback and revision. The lesson plan template for fall 2020 was edited to include a section where the SI Leaders were required to detail and describe the community-building strategy they chose to use that week. As each session had the same cohort of students, the SI Leaders were able to conduct activities that went beyond the superficial icebreaker and develop a cohesive community within each cohort. We determined that limiting the number of students to 12 per
, document, observe, and quantify the development of a student’s EM during hands-on experiences in an REU. his work-in-progress paper describes the successful implementation of concept mapping as anTanalytical tool to measure student learning outcomes in the non-traditional learning environment of an REU. Furthermore, this paper describes a work in a current study to explore the development of research self-efficacy and engineering identity development of early career engineering students who participate in a 10-week interdisciplinary research experience and community-building activities through the Engineering Grand Challenges Scholars REUp rogram. This paper illustrates the key role of the
research interests include retention, mathematics and materials science teaching and learning, first-year programs, accreditation, and faculty development.Prof. Kevin Pitts, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Vice Provost for Undergraduate Education, Professor of PhysicsDr. Michelle Ferrez, University of California, San Diego Michelle is currently the Director of the IDEA Engineering Student Center at UC San Diego, Jacobs School of Engineering (Inclusion-Diversity-Excellence-Achievement). Dr. Ferrez has twenty three years of experience on diversity in STEM access, retention, and success programs in higher education (4 year and community colleges), K-12 and graduate student pipeline programs, and the role of four
sustainability; synthesizing the influence of societal and individual worldviews on decision-making; assessing STEM students’ learning in the spaces of design, ethics, and sustainability; and exploring the impact of pre-engineering curriculum on students’ abilities and career trajectories.Dr. Brandon Sorge, Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis Brandon Sorge is an Assistant Professor of STEM Education Research in the Department of Technology Leadership and Communication at the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at IUPUI. His research interests include all aspects of STEM education, especially the impacts of all levels of policy on the development of a STEM literate workforce. He also conducts research
design students tasked with constructing dorm rooms for individualswith special needs. Additionally, integrating service-learning projects (SLP) has been explored toenhance community engagement in engineering education. Carrico et al. [9] studied the impactof a multidisciplinary project-based service-learning experience, fostering collaboration, deeplearning, teamwork, and communication between Mechanical Engineering and Speech-LanguagePathology students. The collaboration involved developing manufacturing processes for the in-house fabrication of cost-effective therapeutic materials. Keshwani and Adams [10] observedpositive effects on engineering students' communication and leadership skills through a cross-disciplinary project-based service
importantly, the FEP staff works closely with theCollege of Arts and Sciences to implement block scheduling for the Fall Semester. In the blockscheduling system, each FEP student is assigned to a block consisting of approximately 22students. All students in a given block have identical class schedules (except for electives).The Freshman Engineering Student Services ProgramThe FESSP provides proactive support to FEP students through summer orientation, academicskills and personal wellness workshops, academic advising, peer mentoring, supplementalinstruction and tutoring, an academic living-learning community, and extracurricular activities. Page
retention and progression through STEM pathways. This research team found itself, like many other institutions and instructors, at thecrossroads of online learning environments, social and educational inequities and historicallydifficult course content, with all the difficulties and opportunities that these components afford.This unique course taught online for the first time, with a depth and breadth of programmingcontent, can be challenging for all students but can especially halt underrepresented studentsprogress through their engineering coursework and ultimately prevent them from achievingsuccess in engineering. In an already challenging semester -- a pandemic which causeduniversity closure and completely online instruction -- our
something to Design idea å gather info å alternative solutions 6 do with the idea, then design, then å best solution å design and implement. build, test repeat?DYF Teacher Institute Participants Likely to Incorporate More Engineering CurriculumTwo of the DYF teaching institute objectives revolve around creating a community of teachers Page 14.705.13interested in using engineering approaches: • Develop awareness of existing engineering secondary school curriculum, K-12 engineering education research (see www.teachengineering.com). • Develop a community of teachers interested in pursuing
Education, Schooling, & Society and Computing & Digital Technologies Departments. In addition, he is a faculty fellow of the Institute for Educational Initiatives and Notre Dame Initiative for Global Development. In both his research and his teaching, Alex works to advance his mission: to fight for and create the conditions necessary for the liberation of learning and the alleviation of unnecessary anxiety and harm in education, for both students and faculty. Alex envisions his role as that of a learning experience architect, pioneering more inclusive and authentic assessment through technology. His current research focuses on applied learning research, design, and evaluation, including learning analytics, flexi
learning practices, and epistemic beliefs. Other projects in the Benson group involve students’ navigational capital, and researchers’ schema development through the peer review process. Dr. Benson is an American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Fellow, and a member of the European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI), American Educational Research Association (AERA) and Tau Beta Pi. She earned a B.S. in Bioengineering (1978) from the University of Vermont, and M.S. (1986) and Ph.D. (2002) in Bioengineering from Clemson University.Dr. D. Matthew Boyer, Clemson University Dr. Boyer is a Research Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering & Science Education in the College of Engineering
. Thislaboratory model has not changed significantly in several generations of engineers, and this visionis remarkably common for seasoned engineers and fresh graduates alike. While bench electronictest equipment has traditionally filled a critical need in engineering education, it has severaldrawbacks.Bench test equipment is expensive and outfitting a lab with a dozen or more stations is a majorfinancial investment by the institution. The bench equipment wears out or becomes obsolete overtime and has to be replaced periodically, with a recurring cost every 10-15 years. The equipmentis physically large, taking up valuable lab space, and is heavy, rendering the equipment immobile.It is common to have bench equipment permanently mounted to the bench itself
bioelectricphenomena. The students are enrolled in the biomedical engineering concentration within thenewly accredited general engineering program at East Carolina University. Bioelectricphenomena were introduced through a group project so that, in addition to learning new subjectmatter, they would (A) integrate knowledge developed in prerequisite and co-requisitecoursework in a new setting, (B) develop their independent research skills, (C) gain experienceworking in teams, and (D) develop facility to apply their new knowledge, not just recite it. Thesetraits are considered to be important aspects of the program goal to producing work-readyengineers.Teams of 3-4 students were given a model of an axon, surrounding tissue and a stimulating nervecuff, written in
for SWE, and on the development team for the TeachEngineering digital library. Her primary re- search interests are on student identity, recruitment, and retention in K-12 and undergraduate engineering.Ms. Janet L Yowell, University of Colorado Boulder Janet serves as the Associate Director of K-12 Engineering Education for the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulder. Involved since 2000, she collaborates on the College’s ambitious K-12 engineering initiatives, including their capacity-building and school partner- ship programs. She coordinates the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program’s NSF-funded TEAMS Program (Tomorrow’s Engineers. . . creAte. iMagine. Succeed.) which
education beyond my undergrad degree, but I decided to stay at MIT for MEngbecause of the encouragement of NEET instructors and through learning about their careers. Theother class of role models was my peers either in my NEET Autonomous Machines cohort or inthe cohort that was older than me. I saw the amazing work they did, and I strove to challengemyself similarly in my coursework, research, and industry experiences.”“[#10] I appreciated the patience, kindness, and efforts of the technical instructors in NEET andtried to emulate these characteristics when I TA’ed [assisted lecturers in the teaching of] classeslater on (specifically, I developed better spoken and written communication skills andcollaboration skills).”“[#12] I can't say that I
findings from the culminating third year of a three-yearNSF-funded project to improve introductory engineering courses at two universities carried outby the interdisciplinary team.Engineering InstructionThe field of engineering education has changed from its 19 th-century emphasis on industrialskills to the post-World War II focus on scientific and mathematics skills to a shift in the 1970sand 1980s that centered on such skills as critical thinking, communications, and team work. 16Recent industry reports indicate that engineering graduates are lacking in the areas of creativethinking and design, communication, and other professional skills.9 Graduates have been foundto be weak in their understanding of certain engineering processes and to lack
their choice of major? [8]. They also took a similar approachBinghamton University has taken.While the motivation and types of information used in their choices is important, other studieshave also investigated the sources of the information. One study concluded that “Self-LedExploration of Engineering Disciplines” (SLE) is the single most important source ofinformation that students use in deciding on an engineering major [9]. Mohammadi-Aragh et al.surveyed a range of factors, including parents’ educational achievement, timing of the desire tostudy engineering, and current engineering major in order to develop a survey instrument thatcould be used by universities to collect information concerning the choice of engineering major[10]. Some other
the collegiate setting,building their STEM identities through meeting and interacting with future professors and peers thatmay have similar career goals, allowing them to effectively create and integrate into a supportive Proceedings of the 2025 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX Copyright 2025, American Society for Engineering Education 2community system have shown that participants in these programs are twice as likely to persist andsucceed in STEM degree programs. During these programs, students are given the resources tobegin to learn how to successfully
graduate with little development of leadership skillsand engineering educators do not currently have sufficient understanding of how engineeringstudents develop into leaders.This NSF ECE supported project seeks to close that gap by improving our understanding of therole leadership plays in the process of becoming an engineer. Specifically, this work investigatesthe role of leadership as a component of the development of an engineering identity inundergraduate students. By building on the idea that seeing oneself as an engineering leaderrequires the development of an engineering identity in combination with the development of aleadership identity, this work investigates the process of becoming an engineering leader andleverages the central role
university is smaller, primarily undergraduate, private university, while the second is alarge, research-intensive, public university. Both universities have extensive entrepreneurialprograms available to engineering students.Using an IRB approved protocol students were recruited for the study via emails from theirdepartments and faculty. The study was designed to collect similar samples from each university,in terms of number of interviews conducted, gender, and whether they had exposure toentrepreneurship education or not. Those who had completed either academic credentials orsignificant coursework in entrepreneurship were classified as ‘entrepreneurial’ based on datacollected through a demographic survey, prior to the start of the interview.In
Southern California and B.S. in Electronics and Communication Engineering from India.Dr. Aileen Huang-Saad, University of Michigan Aileen is faculty in Engineering Education and Biomedical Engineering. Previously, Aileen was the Associate Director for Academics in the Center for Entrepreneurship and was responsible for building the Program in Entrepreneurship for UM undergraduates, co-developing the masters level entrepreneur- ship program, and launching the biomedical engineering graduate design program. Aileen has received a number of awards for her teaching, including the Thomas M. Sawyer, Jr. Teaching Award, the UM ASEE Outstanding Professor Award and the Teaching with Sakai Innovation Award. Prior to joining the
Paper ID #17981Impact of Various Pedagogies on Design Confidence, Motivation, and Anxietyof First-Year Engineering StudentsDr. James Blake Hylton, Ohio Northern University Dr. Hylton is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Ohio Northern University. He pre- viously completed his graduate studies in Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, where he con- ducted research in both the School of Mechanical Engineering and the School of Engineering Education. Prior to Purdue, he completed his undergraduate work at the University of Tulsa, also in Mechanical En- gineering. He currently teaches first-year
papers. He is honored with Inaugural Georgia Tech. College of Engineering Outstanding Teacher Award in 2022, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Award in 2020, Geoffrey G. Eichholz Faculty Teaching Award in 2015 and Undergraduate Educator Award in 2012 from the Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL), Georgia Tech.Terri Dunbar Terri Dunbar is currently a PhD candidate in Engineering Psychology at the Georgia Institute of Technology, as well as a Graduate Teaching Assistant at Tech's Center for Teaching & Learning. Her research focuses on identify best practices in how to scaffold and sequence the learning activities to support the development of systems thinking while using simulations.Ruth Yow (Georgia Institute of
a senior Manufacturing Systems Engineering course.29Although not measured, the authors mention several benefits for undergraduate studentsparticipating in the program, including the development of project management experience,experience with fabrication and prototyping, and proposal writing. The course also served as ameans of building connections between the university and the high school, and as a means ofrecruiting students for the engineering program at the university. The university also planned todevelop a freshman level introduction to robotics course that would be made available to highschool students through an agreement between the two institutions.In addition to mentoring FIRST Robotics Competition teams at local high schools
resources – programfunding, lab and classroom space, equipment, software, etc. New programs must also buildawareness and connections with the local community, industry, and government to attractstudents, offer meaningful learning experiences, and build job placement pipelines. In addition,they must ensure they conform with and enhance the educational mission of the colleges they arepart of. While this can impose limiting curricular constraints, it can also be seen as anopportunity to develop a unique educational product. In 2013, Saint Vincent College (a smallcollege with a strong liberal arts and sciences focus) initiated a four-year bachelor's degree inengineering science after several years of planning. In the decade since that time, the
. Course-related activities are designed to optimize astudent’s potential and chances of success within a chosen career path by providing andsupporting opportunities and experiences that enhance their professional identity and careerprospects (Holland, 2010). In this way, Engineering Problem Solving can be seen as a course thathelps students explore, adopt and/or solidify their engineering identity or by contrast, determinethat engineering is not a preferred part of their identity. Exploration of engineering identity wereencouraged in the course through gaining insights from professionals and developing new skillsthrough projects (Noe & Wilk, 1993). A study by (Holland, et al., 2012) explored how engagingin "capitalization activities