gain diminishing to its minimum value at the adjacent antenna’sboresight.Figure 6 depicts the matched antenna gain patterns with the incident radar signal added. Thisgives two different received powers: P1dBm at receiver 1 (connected to antenna 1), and P2dBm at Figure 6: Antenna pair with incident radar signalreceiver/antenna 2. Look carefully at Figure 6. Note that the difference between the tworeceived powers varies linearly with the angle off of boresight, from a maximum of AdB_BS at 0°(antenna 1’s boresight) to a minimum of 0 dB at 45°. (Beyond that the arrival angle is closer toantenna 2, so all of the following calculations would be reversed and worked with respect toantenna 2 instead of Antenna 1.) It is this
ability to be effective interdisciplinary team members and leaders. 5. Student designs will comply with a realistic level of engineering codes and standards and shall include considerations such as environment, economics, manufacturability, sustainability, health and safety.There are a variety of options when it comes to teaching both design process and the actualcapstone course(s).5 Some schools have a separate course in design methods.6, 7, 8, 9 This wouldthen be followed by either a one or two semester capstone course. Other schools integrate theinstruction in design methods or processes into the one or two semester capstone experience.10As previously mentioned, this may be the first time that students have been exposed to a
Perhaps a Shift in Direction in Engineering Management Education: A Discussion and Work in Progress of Adding Data Modeling Topics to the Foundation of an EM CurriculumAbstractTraditionally, the Engineering Management body of knowledge contains topics such asproject management, financial resource planning, and the management of technology, etc.But are these traditional tools enough to prepare an Engineering Management student forthe ever more technologically complex and data driven corporate world of the 2020’s?More recently systems engineering concepts have been added to the EngineeringManagement Body of Knowledge. Is this now enough? Stevens Institute of Technologythinks not. Over the past few semesters, Stevens incorporated more
supported by a Verso Paper Corporation.7. Bibliography1. Center for Energy Workforce Development, “Gaps in the Energy Workforce Pipeline 2015 CEWD Survey Results”, available at: www.cewd.org/surveyreport/CEWD2015SurveySummary.pdf2. A. Sergeyev and N. Alaraje, “Industry-Driven Power Engineering Curriculum Development in Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology Program,” 2011 ASEE Conf. & Expo, paper AC 2011-953, Vancouver, Canada.3. S. Hossein Mousavinezhad, T. E. Schlesinger, Michael R. Lightner, Mark J. Smith, Langis Roy, Barry J. Sullivan, S. S. (Mani) Venkata, and Anthony Kuh, “Electric Energy and Power Educational Programs Development Workshop,” 2011 ASEE Conf. & Expo, paper AC 2011-554, Vancouver, Canada
real-world process orsystem over time." Furthermore, in designing new systems, a simulation experiment would helpdesigners run various scenarios to select the optimal alternative among the others. In some casesit may be possible to study the real system and to modify it to observe any change in the systemoutput(s), for example, examining the impact of increasing the number of automated check-inkiosks on reducing passengers’ waiting time in airports [2]. However, in some other situations, forinstance, in emergency rooms, it is not an appropriate approach to make changes in the system.Simulation courses have been part of the Industrial Engineering curriculum since the 90’s.Simulation courses have been offered in traditional Industrial
the Co-PI of an NSF Funded Step 1B program called COMPASS, a Co-PI of the NSF-funded S-STEM program at UCF entitled the ”Young Entrepreneur and Scholar(YES) Scholarship Program” as well as the NSF-funded STEP program entitled ”EXCEL:UCF-STEP Pathways to STEM: From Promise to Prominence.” Dr. Young’s interests are in improving student learning in mathematics and increasing success in STEM education.Dr. Michael Georgiopoulos, University of Central Florida Michael Georgiopoulos received the Diploma in EE from the National Technical University in Athens, his MS degree and Ph.D. degree in EE from the University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, in 1981, 1983 and 1986, respectively. He is currently a Professor in the
force.AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank the National Science Foundation for support of this research research (Award1329283: Access to Cooperative Education Programs and the Academic and EmploymentReturns by Race, Gender, and Discipline), as well as Eckhard Groll, Stephen Wanders, TinaAlsup and the SPHERE Lab for their helpful feedback and assistance. The views expressedherein are solely the authors’.References Cited1. Haddara, M., & Skanes, H. (2007). A reflection on cooperative education : from experience to experiential learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 8(1), 67–76.2. Edgar, S., Francis-Coad, J., & Connaughton, J. (2013). Undergraduate reflective journaling in work integrated learning : Is it relevant to
from the assessments. Other programs can verify the difference in skills andlearning outcomes of students who did and did not participate in an international SDE. This is avery exciting collaboration with many positive aspects to explore and share.Bibliography1. Laguette, Stephen W. Development of a Capstone Design Program for Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering. Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.2. Dieter, George E. and Linda C. Schmidt. Engineering Design. Fourth Edition. McGraw-Hill.3. Davis, Denny and S. Beyerlein, P. Thompson, K. Gentili, L. McKenzie. How Universal are Capstone Design Course Outcomes? Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.4. Beyerlein, Steven and D. Davis, M
traditional theoretical and experimental components of the course(s). In a previous paper we proposed an approach to introducing computational physics in the undergraduate curriculum by blending computation and experimentation in the Modern Physics course and laboratory with materials that discuss contemporary physics subjects (quantum dots, LASERs, superconductivity, etc). In this paper we report on the homework problems and laboratories that have been developed as part of this project and the successes and challenges in implementing these materials, and we point to future work to be done in this area.In 2011, the American Association of Physics Teachers approved a “Statement
. Foroudastan, S. (Febuary 2010). Facilitating Cultural Diffusion through Collegiate Design Competition Teams.Proceedings of 4th Annual Conference of Tennessee Consortium for International Studies.2. Foroudastan, S. (2012). MTSU’s MSPS Program Bridges Gap Between Academia and the Scientific Industry.Proceedings of the 2012 Hawaii University International Conferences.3. Foroudastan, S. & Thompson, B. “Experimental Vehicles Program Research and Innovation Prepares Studentsfor Challenges of Tomorrow.” TIIJ (2013): 61-67.4. Professional Science Masters. “Professional Science Masters.” Retrieved November 10, 2014 fromhttp://www.sciencemasters.com
. Page 26.1091.3The Role of Building RelationshipsIn order to undertake challenging design and build projects with industry sponsors, a substantiallevel of trust must be established between the university and the sponsors. Such projects requirean understanding of the capabilities of the student teams on the part of the corporate sponsors, aswell as an understanding of the culture and expectations of their corporate partners by thestudents and faculty. This level of trust requires long term planning, development, and nurturing.The engineering programs as Grand Valley State University were launched at the request of localindustry in the 1980’s. The programs were designed by a team of faculty in collaboration withpracticing engineers from industry
Paper ID #12970Maker: Candy Crane RobotDr. Andy Zhang, New York City College of Technology Dr. Andy S. Zhang received his PH.D. from the City University of New York in 1995. He is currently the program director of a Mechatronics Project in the New York City College of Technology/CUNY. For the past 10 years, Dr. Zhang has been working on bringing mechatronics technology to the undergraduate en- gineering technology curricula and on helping high school students to learn mechatronics through FIRST Robotic Competition events.angran xiao, New York City College of Technology, City University of New York Angran Xiao is an
., Chakrabarti, A., and Bligh, T., 2003, “Towards an ‘ideal’ approach for concept generation,” Design Studies, 24(4), pp. 341–355.[9] Yilmaz, S., Daly, S. R., Jablokow, K. W., Silk, E. M., and Rosenberg, M., 2014, “Investigating impacts on the ideation flexibility of engineers.”[10] Kirton, M. J., 1976, “Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5), pp. 622–629.[11] Jablokow, K. W., and Kirton, M. J., 2009, Problem Solving, Creativity, and the Level-Style Distinction. In Perspectives on the Nature of Intellectual Styles (L.-F. Zhang and R. J. Sternberg, Eds.)., Springer, New York, NY.[12] Jablokow, K. W., 2008, “Developing problem solving leadership: a cognitive approach
enabled success, circumventing unsupportive advisors,combating isolation using peer networks, consciously demonstrating abilities to counteractdoubt, finding safe spaces for their whole selves, getting out to stay in STEM, remembering their Page 26.1582.2passion for science, and engaging in activism.” Note that navigating the system is also one ofthe three dimensions of becoming an engineer noted by Stevens et al6.While most of Ko et al.’s coping strategies primarily involve taking action, “remembering theirpassion for science” and “demonstrating abilities to counteract doubt” are primarily internalpsychological acts. In this paper, we build on
dt Tj m s m s in i i out e e Sgen with Sgen 0 j Figure 2 -- Fundamental Conservation & Accounting EquationsOne of the advantages of using the accounting framework is that it lends itself to a commonproblem-solving approach regardless of the problem. When a
, broad input fromthe professional community, and respect for the contributions of previous BOK committees.References1. Ressler, S. J., “The Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge and Accreditation Criteria: A Plan for Long-Term Management of Change.” Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Page 26.1634.5 Education, June 2011.2. Ressler, S. J. “The Sociology of Professions: Application to the Civil Engineering ‘Raise the Bar’ Initiative.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 137 (3), 151-161.3. Ressler, S. J., “Influence of the New Civil Engineering Body
/4. Campbell, C., Senior Mechanical Engineer, iRobot, Email Correspondence, 20165. Chester, I. (2007). Teaching for CAD expertise, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 23-356. Devine, K PhD., Illinois State University, Telephone Interview, 20167. Gaughran, W. F. (2002). Cognitive modeling for engineers, Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.8. Harris, S., Co-Founder and VP of OnShape, Telephone Interview, 20169. Hinkle, K., Senior Designer, Senior Aerospace, Email Correspondence, 201610. Krish, S. (2011). A practical generative design method, Computer-Aided Design, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 88- 10011. PTC. (2011
countries. For example in Pakistan firstBiomedical Engineering program was offered in early 1990’s. The major cause was lack ofresources and awareness which eventually resulted in absence of defined career path neither inacademia nor in industry. The situation is changing now with a positive rate. However, there stillis only a small fraction of students opting for this field in their undergraduate studies. This hasposed a challenge to academia to introduce students of different background to thismultidisciplinary field. A new introductory course for undergraduate ECE students was neededespecially. Several courses are offered at various institutes for non-biomedical students; howevera single course covering the breadth of this field without going
this international workshop program since 2015. I designed learningenvironment with design principles for knowledge building in both of programs (table 1)(table 2)(table 3).In 2015, three Japanese students and six Indian students took part in this program. The themeof 2015’s program is “Application software with Augmented Reality (AR) for Visitors”.Students developed an application software that people can use on android smartphone.Indian students and Japanese students developed new application software for each other.Students ware required knowledge of JAVA, knowledge of AR, graphic design skill andprograming skill as engineering knowledge and skills. All of Japanese students came fromengineering department, but major was different. One was
”, ICEE2011 - August 2011, Belfast, North Ireland, UK.5. Friesel,A., Avramides, K., Cojocaru, D.: “Identifying how PELARS-project can support the development of new curriculum structures in engineering education”, The Experimental International Conference 2015 (exp.at'15), June, 2015, University of Azores, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal.6. Krumm, A.E.; Waddington, R.J.; Lonn, S.; Teasley, S.D. :” Increasing Academic Success in Undergraduate Engineering Education using Learning Analytics: A Design-Based Research Project”; Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2012-04 ; . http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/1060327. Dragon, T., Mavrikis
specific to a first year Thermodynamics course, and aMechanical and Biosystems engineering program, demonstrate the aptitudes for lifelong learning.The analysis is guided by the research question that emerged from the data: What evidence ofstudents’ aptitudes for lifelong learning is found when students are encouraged to speak abouttheir learning experiences? The data are analyzed via hypothesis coding that was constructedusing the seven Dimensions of Learning Power from Deakin Crick et al.’s (2004) EffectiveLifelong Learning Inventory (ELLI)6, and the emergent codes of Becoming an engineer andAppreciation for lifelong learning. Through this pilot study, which has serendipitously emergedfrom these data, we propose to explore both the capacity and
needed to support the positive effectsof concept mapping and determine the best implementation method.References[1] Abel, Willie Mae, and Martha Freeze. "Evaluation of Concept Mapping in an Associate Degree NursingProgram." Journal of Nursing Education 45.9 (2006): n. pag. Web.[2] Bar-Lavie, Ben. "Enhancing Meaningful Learning in an Environmental Education Program: A Case Study of aClass Empowered Through the Use of Novak's and Gowin's Principles of Learning How to Learn, ConceptMapping, Interviewing, and Education." Cornell University, n.d. Web.[3] Brown, David S. "High School Biology: A Group Approach to Concept Mapping." The American BiologyTeacher 65.3 (2003): 192-97. Web.[4] Karpicke, J. D., and J. R. Blunt. "Retrieval Practice Produces
(s) despite the shortened timeline. Second attempts (or firstre-takes) were administered in the immediate post-class window mentioned above. Frequently,students were able to leave those sessions knowing if their work that day met the standard or ifthey would need a third attempt. Between a first and second attempt, students were left to theirown devices to determine how to remediate their understanding. They were welcome to seekextra instruction, but not required to do so. Between the second and third attempt, however, theywere required to discuss their particular issues with the instructor before continuing the examcycle. Institutional administrative constraints prevented dis-enrolling students from the course fornot demonstrating required
ability toapply fundamental principles into the experimental studies, understand the aspects of thematerials, and recognize the applications of the materials in engineering fields. At the end of thesemester of Fall 2017, a questionnaire was handed out in class to assess the learningeffectiveness. Four questions related to the experimental studies are: 1. Do you agree that the lab is a good way to learn and reinforce the fundamental concepts of the materials? a. Strongly agree b. Agree c. Neutral d. Disagree e. Strongly disagree 2. Which of the following has been the best source(s) for you to learn the course materials? a. Lectures b. Homework c. Labs d. Midterm exam e. Examples 3. Which
a four-component model. Mis Quarterly , 30 (1), 167-180.Peterson, D. K. (2002). Computer ethics: the influence of guidelines and universal moralbeliefs. Information Technology & People , 15 (4), 346-361.Phukan, S. (2005). Using Information Technology Ethically: New Dimensions in the Age ofthe Internet. The Business Review, Cambridge , 4 (1), 234-239.Renwick, J. S., & Riemenschneider, C. K. (2013). A model of ethical decision making byinformation technology students. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges , 28 (5), 62-69.Riemenschneider, C. K., Leonard, L. N., & Manly, T. S. (2011). Students' Ethical Decision-Making in an Information Technology Context: A Theory of Planned Behavior Approach.Journal of Information Systems
the open-source CFD code (OpenFOAM).Dr. Jason E. Butler, University of Florida c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 2018 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference Work in Progress: Peer-Led Research Methods Workshop for First-Year Ph.D. Students (Student Paper) Vincent J. Tocco1, Kevin E. Buettner1, Madeline Sciullo2, Jennifer S. Curtis3 and Jason E. Butler1 1 Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville FL; 2Department of Electrical andComputer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville FL; 3Department of Chemical Engineering, University of
consider quantitative accreditationstandards. In an era when a majority of engineering schools did not yet have extensive offeringsin engineering science, quantitative standards were the quickest way of getting U.S. engineeringschools to accommodate the perceived curricular needs of the Cold War era [23].EC 2000’s OriginsThe Cold War consensus favoring the engineering sciences generally held into the 1970s.Nevertheless, as concerns about U.S. manufacturing productivity and national competitivenessgrew during the 1970s and 1980s, there emerged a sense that the U.S. was winning one front ofthe Cold War, only to be falling behind on the other. While not all U.S. colleges and universitiesembraced the engineering sciences as strongly as others, there
rubric, Watson et al.’s sustainable design rubric,Nagel et al.’s design process rubric, and the creativity-measurement rubrics and matrices ofGenco et al. and Moss.1. Background and Relevant LiteratureDesign for the Environment is a class of approximately 30 undergraduate engineering studentsand is comprised of juniors and seniors from all disciplines. The class size is maintained at amaximum of 30, in part so the school’s maker spaces can be utilized for in-class activities andprototyping. The course covers fundamental concepts, including sustainability designframeworks, the design process and the role of innovation, life cycle assessment, and toxicityand risk, as well as focused case studies on topics such as energy, water, agriculture
seek to gather data from large sample sizes that provide strong evidence for possible trends.We recognize that our current methodology is not feasible for a larger-scale study implementedby course instructors nationwide, as it requires work on the part of the instructor. We aredeveloping standardized problems and an accompanying questionnaire that can be easilyintegrated as a homework problem in the appropriate course(s). We will use online datacollection, and point-of-collection consent, to minimize any work for the course instructor.To further support standardization, we will not be using previous simulation tools such asGMAT but rather are developing simulation tools that can be run on software commonly used byengineering students, such as
toengineering education because of the link between identity formation, critical for entry andretention into a discipline, and the lack of diversity in United States engineering: “undergraduateengineering education is dominated by [w]hite males. The majority of all bachelor degreesawarded in engineering are to [w]hite males”[4],[5]. Thinking about students’ meaningful writingexperiences as related to enagement may be a way to further examine engagement as a “precursorto persistence”[6].Defining meaningful writing is important to understand its distinction. In the Meaningful WritingProject, Eodice, Geller, & Lerner [3] define meaningful writing as Agentive: develop[s] a sense of agency about [students] as writers, learners, and thinkers