undertaking the ALERT (Active Learning inEngineering Technology) initiative to address the issue by implementing evidence-based activelearning techniques in selected courses to foster students’ interest and persistence. Statics,Dynamics and Thermodynamics are the target courses. Statics is a gateway course foundationalto the rest of the program, Dynamics is taken right after Statics, and Thermodynamics is one ofthe most challenging senior level courses. These courses are serving as the avenues formeasuring the effectiveness of using active learning techniques. The specific techniques we areimplementing are: in-class experiments, just-in-time teaching, team quizzes, and students asteachers. On a broader impact, the ALERT initiative will be the launch
and understanding, designs and implements assessment tools in education, researches on the use of technology in the classroom and physics laboratory, and conducts research on the determination of what are the main factors that influence learning and understanding of first semester engineering students. Monica is currently collaborating with the Educational and Academic Innovation Unit, UNIDA (for its acronym in Spanish) at the School of Engineering of the Andres Bello University, where she works as teacher trainer in active learning methodologies, she teaches undergraduate courses in Environmental Management and Energy and Circular Economy, and is a thesis advisor on the engineering programs at this institution
students attribute to it. A component of course quality is thedelivery or presentation of the course content. This study focused on developing strategies toimprove this aspect of course quality. Often in engineering, instructors focus more on what theybelieve is good for the students (and they are often correct), but do not adequately take intoaccount the students’ point of view on the instructional delivery methods and the entireeducational experience. This often results in gaps or mismatches between student expectationsand learning preferences, and faculty expectations and teaching preferences. Stedinger [1] illustrates how these gaps can be overcome if faculty members helpstudents to better articulate what is working and not working for
Session 1302 The Curriculum Technology Enhancement Program at Embry Riddle University James G. Ladesic Embry-Riddle Aeronautical UniversityAbstractMost of the faculty now teaching engineering at US institutions grew up with thevacuum tube, slide rule, and punch card. Over the past ten years, however, therehas been a paradigm shift in the nature of computing technologies far differentfrom those that faculty have spent the majority of their life’s experience gettingcomfortable with. Computer network-based engineering technologies have been,more or less, implemented throughout industry. The
. Carrying out laboratory experiments and generating experimental data, visiting aproject site, and using pencil and paper to produce a schematic, are gradually fading away. Thesetraditional tools were instrumental in developing an engineering common sense. It is argued herethat generating data from physical models is potentially a great learning tool, particularly whenthe model is built by the students. Building a model, testing a model, generating physical datafrom the model, and analyzing said data, help students alternate between inductive andconductive processes, thus broadening their design vision and their understanding of theexperimental approach to engineering design. There is potentially a real need to research theways to teach engineering
galore. This will require a level of technological, quantitativeand scientific literacy. One might call this STEM-literacy, where the literacy level not onlyincludes literacy in each on the four components but also in how the four components worksynergistically together. Additionally, technology/engineering can provide valuablecontextual education settings resulting in effective learning (of math, science and “non-technical” subjects like history, social studies and language arts). At our institution, TheCollege of New Jersey (TCNJ), it was felt that an effective place to impact technologicalliteracy, as well as increase the effectiveness of teaching and learning is with future K-5teachers. So, approximately 10 years ago a multidisciplinary
Fort Wane, Indiana, 46805 E-mail: cfreitas@pfw.edu AbstractThis paper describes the instructor experience and preliminary findings obtained during thedevelopment and implementation of a narrative pedagogy in first-year engineering (FYE). Theprimary contribution of this research lies in detailing practical experiences to guide thedevelopment of new teaching strategies in comparable educational contexts. This research isembedded within a broader, long-term investigation aimed at rethinking the curriculum,evaluation methods, and teaching techniques of a FYE program. Specifically, we discuss anongoing study and lessons learned focused on applying a narrative-driven
, NYProf. Emily Liu, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Dr. Liu is a Professor of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Nuclear Engineering at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI). Dr. Liu earned PhD from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2005). Liu received 2018-2019 ELATE at Drexel Fellowship. He was the recipient of a Faculty Development Grant from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and numerous teaching and research awards from School of Engineering at Rensselaer, as well as the Cozzarelli Prize in Engineering and Applied Sciences from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. As a Physicist and Engineer by training, Liu’s tech- nical research is focused on solving high impact problems associated with
Session 3266 A Course in Life-cycle Engineering John K. Gershenson, Assistant Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering The University of AlabamaABSTRACTThis paper describes the development and implementation of a class in the mechanicalaspects of life-cycle engineering. This course teaches students to use cutting edgedesign methodologies and analysis tools and apply them to the redesign of industrialproducts. The life-cycle engineering course benefits from recent advances in designeducation across the country and at The University of
SCMcurriculum [10], and is proven to be very effective and popular across all levels of programsincluding undergraduate, graduate, and executive education [11]. Developed by MIT′s SloanSchool of Management in the 80s, the Beer Game was originally created to teach students systemsconcepts and systems thinking [12]. However, as the content area of SCM continues to expand, sodo the Beer Game learning extensions which now span demonstrating the bullwhip effect, risk-pooling, and technology integration, to name a few [13]. In response, student participants get thechance to actively learn about the benefit of supply chain awareness and communication, theimportance of supply chain collaborative strategic decision making, and the benefit of working asa team to
Paper ID #23641Work in Progress: Projects in Engineering Education – Cross-fertilizationBetween Communication and Situated LearningDr. Joakim Sigurd Wren, Linkoping University, Sweden Joakim Wren is an Associate Professor in Applied Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics at Link¨oping University, Sweden. His interest is on education and research in Engineering Thermodynamics and En- ergy engineering. He has a long experience in development and management of engineering programs and implementation of teaching methods facilitating active learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018
. He teaches a course in Internal Combustion Engines that emphasizes mathematical modeling of thermophysical systems. He also teaches a senior laboratory course that introduces principles of experiment design and small-sample statistics. Dan’s doctoral research involves use of catalytic ignitors to support combustion of water/ethanol fuel. Dan also manages the UI Small Engine Research Facility – helping students with the FutureTruck, Formula SAE, and Clean Snowmobile Challenge competitions. He received a UTC Student of the Year award in 2003 for his efforts. Page 11.12.1Marie Racine, University of
andinvestigate faculty awareness and adoption of a wide variety of research-based instructionalstrategies in engineering education.13 They found three major types of factors that contribute tothe decision to adopt innovations:13 The most prevalent type of factor was resources (e.g., funding, computers, classroom and laboratory space, etc.). Faculty member related issues occurred as the second most common type of factor, and included: time for preparation, management of labor-intensive innovations, culture of the faculty members’ environment, “resistance to change, marginalization of teaching in promotion and tenure, and skepticism regarding evidence of improved student learning. (p. 199)”13 The third
MatLAB involve using matrix algebra for most part to solve the equations obtained byeither direct stiffness method or by energy methods for 1D and 2D problems. CAE tools involvemodeling components that involve simple or complex geometry, and solving those using SOLIDEDGE/UG/ANSYS/IDEAS software. Results of assessment will be presented in the form ofcharts and tables and discussed in detail. A sample assessment and evaluation form will also beincluded in the paper.IntroductionMore and more universities are teaching basics of finite element analysis at the undergraduatelevel with more emphasis on theory at the graduate level. For the undergraduates though, thereshould be a balanced approach between basic theory coverage and more simulations
Paper ID #10713Flipping a Classroom: A Continual Process of RefinementProf. Kenneth A Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Kenneth Connor is a professor in the Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering where he teaches courses on plasma physics, electromagnetics, electronics and instrumentation, electric power, and general engineering. His research involves plasma physics, electromagnetics, photonics, engineering education, diversity in the engineering workforce, and technology enhanced learning. Since joining the Rensselaer faculty in 1974, he has been continuously involved in research programs at such
.”“No problem,” laughed Lunts, sensing Twigg’s interest. “We can get you geeked-upquickly enough with the right training and support. See, check this out,” said Lunts as hehanded Twigg a brochure from the Campus’ Center for Teaching and Learning. “Thecenter can help you learn all you need to know.” Twigg took the brochure and quicklyscanned it. The brochure explained very clearly how the center could quickly teachprofessors how to design, implement and assess online courses. Page 9.822.2 2“Let me think about it Bruce. I’ve got to go now and get to my class
AC 2011-785: INTEGRATING ONLINE LEARNING IN INTERDISCIPLINARYELECTROMECHANICAL AND ELECTROMECHANICAL/BIOMEDICALDESIGN COURSESSalah Badjou, Wentworth Institute of Technology Professor SALAH BADJOU, Ph.D. Wentworth Institute of Technology Electronics and Mechanical En- gineering Department Boston, MA 02115 USA Email: badjous@wit.edu Telephone: 617 989 4113. Salah Badjou received a B.S. in physics and mathematics and a M.S.in physics from Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, and a Ph.D. in solid-state physics from Northeastern University, Boston, MA. He has a combined multidisciplinary experience of more than 25 years university teaching, research, and industry. This includes two years, as a postdoctoral research fellow
, in 1985, 1986 and 1989, respectively. He was with MIT Lincoln Laboratory from June 1989 to July 1994, as a member of technical staff. During the academic year 1993-94, he was a visiting lecturer at MIT and an adjunct professor at Northeastern University. From August 1994 to July 1998, he was with the ECE Dept., University of Wisconsin, Madison. He was with Boston University from August 1996 to June 2001. He is currently a Distinguished Professor with the Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Department, UC San Diego. His current research interests are 3D video processing, machine learning with applications in health monitoring/analysis and 3D modelling. He is the coauthor (with Prof. Gilbert Strang) of a
to joining ODU in 2013, Dr. Ayala spent three years as a Postdoctoral Researcher at the University of Delaware where he expanded his knowledge on simulation of multiphase flows while acquiring skills in high-performance parallel computing and scientific computation. Before that, Dr. Ayala held a faculty position at Universidad de Oriente in the Mechanical Engineering Department where he taught and developed graduate and undergraduate courses for a number of subjects such as Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, Thermodynamics, Multiphase Flows, Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulic Machinery, as well as Mechanical Engineering Laboratory courses. In addition, Dr. Ayala has had the opportunity to work for a number of engineering
teaching and administrative positions within the University of Wisconsin System, including Assistant professor, Associate professor, Associate chair, and Associate Dean for Academic Affairs. During his career path, he has had several publications, presentations, awards, grants and honors. Dr. Hussein served on several programs and societies, like the Cooperative Academic Partnership Program and Wisconsin Mathematical Association. He currently serves as Chief-in- Editor for the Journal of Mathematical Science & Computer Application. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Proposed Engineering Accredited
each other and mostly taughtwithout laboratory demonstrations due to lack of laboratory resources, particularly, in small four-year non-research institutions. Therefore, Web-based interactive finite element module would Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of Texas at Arlington Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationenable engineering educators to couple structural engineering courses with their respective VE,which would enhance problem-based learning. For example, the effect of variation of structure’sparameters on overall structural system performance can easily be studied with the aid ofVE.This was done by
fundamentals. It offers design and hands-on laboratory courses. Designis integrated through the curriculum that includes a senior level capstone design sequence. Thedepartment has established a set of specific learning objectives to support the mission and thegoals of the department and meet the requirements of ABET accreditation under the EngineeringCriteria 2000 (EC-2000). The objectives have been reviewed and approved by the majorconstituencies of the department. A process for systematic evaluation and updating of thedepartment’s undergraduate educational objectives and outcome is in place. The faculty of theMechanical Engineering Department and the College Accreditation Committee conduct theseevaluations. The Accreditation Committee has developed
Kaneohe Marine Corps Air Station after graduating with his B.S.E.E. Upon completing his M.S.E.E., he was an electrical engineer with the National Bureau of Standards in Boulder, Colorado designing hardware for precision fiber optic measurements. He then entered the commercial sector as a staff engineer with Burroughs Corporation in San Diego, California developing fiber optic LAN systems. He left Burroughs for Tacan/IPITEK Corporation as Manager of Electro-Optic Systems developing fiber optic CATV hardware and systems. In 1990 he joined the faculty of the University of San Diego. He remains an active consultant in radio frequency and analog circuit design, and teaches review coursed
scale, disparate data. He is currently working on a project that ambition to design a system capable of providing students customized motivational stimuli and perfor- mance feedback based on their affective states.Dr. Conrad Tucker, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Tucker holds a joint appointment as Assistant Professor in Engineering Design and Industrial En- gineering at The Pennsylvania State University. He is also affiliate faculty in Computer Science and Engineering. He teaches Introduction to Engineering Design (EDSGN 100) at the undergraduate level and developed and taught a graduate-level course titled Data Mining–Driven Design (EDSGN 561). As part of the Engineering Design Program’s
threefocus areas for the Center and review plans to create high-tech teaching and research laboratoriesthat meet industry workforce demands and projections. This Advisory Board includesrepresentatives from IBM; Alcatel-Lucent; AT&T; CA Technologies; Juniper Networks; Dvirkaand Bartilucci Consulting Engineers; Golden Seeds, NY; Goldman Sachs & Co.; In ZeroSystems; Leviton Manufacturing Co.; Motorola Solutions; Pegasus Global Holdings; Power Page 23.543.2Management Concepts, LLC; Retliff Testing Lab, and others.The School of Engineering has signed, or is in the process of signing, non disclosure andcollaborative agreements (e.g., NDAs and MOUs
16 14 12 13 Presenting research process/results 14 13 13 15 Working in a research group or team 12 13 14 16 Work in a laboratory setting 16 15 14 15 Work in an office setting 9 8 7 7 Field work outside of a laboratory or office setting 2 2 3 1 Developing/using databases 6 3 7 5 Developing/using spreadsheets 14 13 12 15 Developing websites
Page 23.424.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Development of a Mechatronics Course for Senior Mechanical Engineering StudentsAbstractThis paper presents the development of a mechanical engineering senior elective course titled:“ME472 Principles and Applications of Mechatronics System Design”. The main objective ofthis course is to teach students the principles and applications of mechatronic systems. Tenhands-on laboratory projects and two course projects were integrated into the course to enhance astudent’s comprehension of mechatronics concepts. Students were required to complete eachcourse project independently. The outcome of the course was
participate in the REM program. Eachsemester, the REM program began with a Research Studio lasting approximately 8 hours beforestudents began the laboratory experience. The Research Studio included an introduction of tissuetest systems and overall EFRI project goals, completion of laboratory safety training, anintroduction to research ethics, technical writing, and basic laboratory practices, participation ina team building exercise, discussion of the projects to which each student would be exposed, anddiscussion of the expectations for and of RPs. Once RPs completed the Research Studio, each RPwas paired with a graduate student mentor and the mentor’s project. After completion of theResearch Studio, each student was required to spend 3 hours on lab
applications. The goals of thisREU Site program are the following: • To provide a motivational research experience for promising undergraduates • To encourage women, minorities, and physically disadvantaged students to pursue graduate studies • To expose undergraduates to exciting research challenges in membrane science and technology • To facilitate the learning of research methods, laboratory skills, safety awareness, critical thinking, problem solving, research ethics, organizational skills, and oral and written communication skills • To provide an enjoyable and meaningful social/cultural program for the students • To provide financial support for undergraduate students during the summer • To couple
Page 5.49.7students study dc circuits, and the second-year students study ac circuits (requires more advancedmath tools). In both cases, the basic concepts are introduced in lecture/discussion sessions taughtby an engineering faculty member. As the need for mathematical tools is demonstrated, the mathteachers teach the necessary math. Hands-on laboratory sessions reinforce the concepts byallowing the participants to build and test appropriate electrical circuits. At the same time theylearn to use modern electrical test equipment -- multimeters, power supplies, oscilloscopes, etc.In companion computer sessions, specialized software (Pspice or Electronic Workbench) is usedto model electrical circuits, and the results of the computer models are