, thosestudents were not part of this study as they are not Engineering majors. This course introducesstudents to the field of engineering, the design process, and communication of ideas with graphics.Includes team design projects, drawing instruction and assignments, the role of CAD, introductionto the engineering disciplines, engineering history, ethics and case studies of engineering featsand failures, and how things are made. This course has a class capacity of 48 students and offered5 times throughout the academic year.Whatcom Community College:Whatcom Community College (WCC) is a two-year community college that offers a range oftransfer-oriented degrees and professional-technical training programs. The college servesapproximately 11,000 students
Grant No.1635534. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] ASCE, Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future, Second Edition. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2008.[2] P. A. Vesilind and A. S. Gunn, “Sustainable development and the ASCE Code of Ethics,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 72–74, 1998.[3] R. K. comments, “10 projections for the global population in 2050,” Pew Research Center, 03-Feb-2014. .[4] S. J. Davis, K. Caldeira, and H. D. Matthews, “Future CO2 Emissions and
engineering design process. Identify the ethical standards expected of a mechanical engineer Figure 1: ME404 Design Process Graphic from Student NotebookRISD Course Description: ID-24ST-06 Design, Culture and Global Security Each day we consume news, information and media about countless global crises or threats.In many cases, these threats appear too complex for the average citizen to contribute toward amore positive outcome. The Design Culture, and Global Security course at RISD explored therole that design can take to shape culture, public perception and policy around global securityand nuclear weapons.Course Goals The purpose of the RISD Design, Culture, and Global Security course was to employ thetools and processes
firms,” Journal of Career Assessment, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 95–110, 2018.[19] W. Faulkner, “Becoming and belonging: Gendered processes in engineering,” in The Gender Politics of ICT, J. Archibald, J. Emms, F. Grundy, J. Payne, and E. Turner, Eds. London: Middlesex University Press, 2005, pp. 15–26.[20] N. Pless and T. Maak, “Building an inclusive diversity culture: Principles, processes and practice,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 129-147, 2004.[21] J. W. Smith and S. Joseph, “Workplace challenges in corporate America: Differences in black and white,” Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 743-765, 2010.[22] D. Riley, A. E. Slaton, and A. L
● Practice Run Hint List Sample Homework Performance ● Exam Review Session Questions ● AIP/Ethics Training and ● Lead a Lecture ● Discussion Board - Lesson ● Hashtag War TEDTalk ● 4-Year Plan Draft ● Guest Speaker Interview ● Discussion Board - ● Prototype Part for Class ● Peer Review Lab Report Relevant Journal Article Lesson/Purpose ● Conflict Resolution ● Discussion Board - ● Instructor Chosen Practices Relevant Engineering Assignment TechnologyCommon to Gehringer’s [8] list of faculty
. Report was to be written to executive leadership. An ability to recognize -Staffing Final Report: Reasonable ethical and professional conversions and expectation for responsibilities in employees. engineering situations -Ingredient Final Report: Identification of and make informed suppliers alternative suppliers for items that judgements which must including the were at risk of not being delivered consider the impact of Madagascar consistently? 4 engineering solutions in vanilla shortage
. Full participation in this pedagogical study wasencouraged (but not required) for the students enrolled in the module; appropriate processes werefollowed to obtain ethical (IRB) approval from LJMU before the study began. We have groupedthe participants into 5 categories (G1, G2, G3, G4 and G5) based on their backgrounds.The Professional and Leadership Skills module contains a 3-hour creativity lecture sessioncomposed of two parts: (1) entrepreneurship and (2) creativity. The entrepreneurship portionfocuses on the definition of entrepreneurship, the characteristics and competencies ofentrepreneurs, and examples of local entrepreneurs. The creativity portion of the session (theportion of greatest interest here) focuses on creativity identity
,yet, it is clear the model is applicable among many disciplines. Part 1 of the model specifies thefive-core components of interdisciplinary collaboration: 1) interdependence, 2) newly createdprofessional activities, 3) flexibility, 4) collective ownership of goals, and 5) reflection on theprocess [17]. Part 2 outlines the influences on interdisciplinary collaboration: professional role,structural characteristics, personal characteristics, and a history of collaboration [17]. Figure 1describes Bronstein’s [17] model and serves as the framework for the remainder of this paper. Professional Role Structural Characterisics - Holding values and ethics specific to each - Manageable
Paper ID #26740Analysis of Student Engagement Data from U.S. News & World Report Re-garding Online Graduate Engineering ProgramsPeter Wesley Odom, Purdue University Wesley is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His primary research interests surround assessment technologies, the psychology of student learning of STEM subjects, ethics, and international community development.Hillary Elizabeth Merzdorf, Purdue University College of EngineeringFrancisco J. Montalvo, Purdue UniversityJason Marion Davis c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Analysis of Student
and visual media • Evaluate images and their sources • Use images and visual media effectively • Design and create meaningful images and visual media • Understand many of the ethical, legal, social, and economic issues surrounding the creation and use of images and visual media, and access and use visual materials ethicallyAcross disciplines, students engage with images and visual materials throughout the course oftheir education. Although students are expected to understand, use, and create images inacademic work, they are not always prepared to do so. Scholarly work with images requiresresearch, interpretation, analysis, and evaluation skills specific to visual materials. These abilitiescannot be taken for granted and
supportive engineering skills and mindsetsDuring this process the committee looked to see how well the outcomes in the onion mapped toinstitutional learning outcomes. Communication and cooperation were both part of the “basicengineering skills” whereas ethics, leadership, and culture and global awareness were allsubcategories of “multiple perspectives on role of engineers and engineering work.” We alsolooked at the mapping of the current ME learning outcomes to the onion in Figure 1. Ourdepartment outcomes include the following: our graduates will be successful in their careers, ourgraduates set and meet their own goals for career fulfillment, our graduates will continueprofessional development, our
project manager on projects through- out the United States. He is a licensed professional engineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, non- verbal communication in the classroom, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a significant number of journal articles and book chapters on these topics.Shawn Griffiths, University of Wyoming Shawn Griffiths is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of Wyoming. Shawn holds a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Utah State University (2009), M.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of Arkansas (2011) and
Exposition, 2016.[15] C. J. Faber, C. S. Smith-Orr, W. L. Lee, C. A. Bodnar, A. Coso Strong, and E. McCave, “Best Practices for Developing a Virtual Peer Mentoring Community,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 2017.[16] R. K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, vol. 5. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1989.[17] J. Walther, A. Pawley, and N. Sochacka, “Exploring Ethical Validation as a Key Consideration in Interpretive Research Quality,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 2015.[18] J. Walther, N. W. Sochacka, and N. N. Kellam, “Quality in Interpretive Engineering Education Research: Reflections on an Example Study
. 22, no. 6, pp. 725–730, 1950.[9] P. A. Simon, S. Finger, D. Krackhardt, D. P. Siewiorek, and A. Smailagic, “Levels of Social Network Analysis and Small Team Problem Solving in the Classroom,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2015.[10] J. Y. Tsai, D. A. Kotys-Schwartz, and D. Knight, “Introducing Actor-Network Theory Via the Engineering Sophomore Year,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015.[11] M. Kenny Feister et al., “Exploring the Social Processes of Ethics in Student Engineering Design Teams,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2015, p. ID# 13322.[12] E. Brewe, V. Sawtelle, L. H. Kramer, G. E. O’Brien, I. Rodriguez, and P
finalised for the course to ensure that there was no way that re-sponses could influence student marks. This research was reviewed and approved by the MasseyUniversity Human Ethics Committee Southern B, Application number 14/40. A total of 54 studentscompleted the questionnaire giving a response rate of 86%. Of the respondents 29 had a computingbackground and 25 had no-computing background. The following questions/statements were evaluated using a five point Likert scale: • How difficult was it for you to develop your website for the Creative Solutions paper? • The website allowed you to be more creative than writing a report would have • The website took more time to complete compared to writing a report • The website was more
Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and the Director of the Abilities, Creativity, and Ethics in Design [ACE(D)] Lab. Bairaktarova’s ongoing research interest spans from engineering to psychology to learning sciences, as she uncovers how individual performance and profes- sional decisions are influenced by aptitudes and abilities, interest, and manipulation of physical and virtual objects. Diana has over fifteen years of experience working as a Design and
leader on a technical team,f. an ability to identify, analyze, and solve broadly-defined engineering technology problems,g. an ability to communicate effectively regarding broadly-defined engineering technology activities,h. an understanding of the need for and an ability to engage in self-directed continuing professional development,i. an understanding of and a commitment to address professional and ethical responsibilities including a respect for diversity,j. a knowledge of the impact of engineering technology solutions in a societal and global context, andk. a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvement.MCT Program Specific Student Outcomes Developed in Engineering Technology Divisionat Wayne State University:M1
Neurocognitive Model of the Ethical Decision-Making Process: Implications for11Study and Practice.” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 91, No. 4, pp. 737-748.12 Charan, R. and Colvin, G. (1999). “Why CEOs Fail.” Fortune, June 21.13 Zaleznik, Abraham (2004). “Managers and Leaders, Are They Different.” Harvard Business Review, January. Heise, W., Czuchry, A., Byrne, T. (2013). “Partnerships between the International Business and Academic14Communities: A Strategic Tool for Achieving Corporate Global Sustainability,” Journal of Current Research inGlobal Business, pp. 11-24, volume 16, number 26, Fall.ANDREW J. CZUCHRY received his Ph.D. from the University of Connecticut in 1969 and was inducted into theAcademy of Distinguished Engineers in 2011
Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the Associate Chair for Under- graduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Biele- feldt serves as the chair of ASEE’s Community Engagement Division and on the AAAS Committee for Scientific Freedom and Responsibility. She is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Jacquelyn F
engineering.Amy Kramer P.E., Ohio State UniversityDr. Emily Dringenberg, Ohio State University Dr. Dringenberg is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Ohio State Uni- versity. She holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering (Kansas State ’08), a M.S. in Industrial Engineering (Purdue ’14) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education (Purdue ’15). Her team, Beliefs in Engineering Re- search Group (BERG), utilizes qualitative methods to explore beliefs in engineering. Her research has an overarching goal of leveraging engineering education research to shift the culture of engineering to be more realistic and inclusive. Dr. Dringenberg is also interested in neuroscience, growth mindset, engi- neering ethics
engineering design and how that learning supports transfer of learning from school into professional practice as well as exploring students’ conceptions of diversity and its importance within engineering fields.Michelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University Michelle Bothwell is an Associate Professor of Bioengineering at Oregon State University. Her teaching and research bridge ethics, social justice and engineering with the aim of cultivating an inclusive and socially just engineering profession.Nick AuYeung, Oregon State University I received my BS from the University of Connecticut and my Ph.D. at Oregon State University, both in Chemical Engineering. I then did postdoctoral research in solar thermochemistry at the
ASEE CIA paper - Google Docs ● Resolve problems at the interface of art and design and computer science through innovative thinking and visual expression. ● Demonstrate an ability to evaluate ethical consequences in creative expression, technical innovation and professional practice. ● Practice lifelong learning, inquiry, and discovery via directed selfresearch and inquiry for artistic and technical projects. These objectives are obtained through the combination of existing courses present in the Computer Science and Art & Design programs, thus requiring little institutional overhead. The
. Solicit (at least 3) and answer questions at the Town hall meeting 10 Judges Rubric of Final Project and Presentation expectations high/ low/ neutral / moderate Missing excelle poor fair /good ntClarity of Theme 0 1 2 3 4(addresses ethics/3Ps)Educational Quality of Exhibit 0 1 2 3 4(clear take away objective )Overall Quality of
on ethical, economic, anddesign method issues.As might be expected, some students resisted the design processes described here as “a completewaste of time”. Students argued that designers are “born, not created”. Many examples from theliterature to support quantitatively the effectiveness of development process were given incounter argument. Students are asked to follow the prescribed procedure for a few weeks. Apromise to discuss, evaluate, and incorporate any suggested improvements usually swaysstalwart resistors (this is an excellent way to give students ownership and responsibility of theirown learning). After the first design milestone during one semester, an elated team gave a class-time testimonial about how the design process and
common courses during their first year of study. These common first-yearcourses become also beneficial as they are typically required for field-specific ABET degree accreditations(ABET, 2018), thus allowing across different engineering and technology fields to use a standard first-yearcurricula.To orient students into college during their first-year of study (Ward-Roof, 2010), common first-year programsin many engineering and science programs are designed for students take introductory mathematics, science,English, and other general STEM courses, typically covering topics such as coding, data representation,engineering design, problem-based solving, teamwork, ethics, and effective communications. In addition, thecommon-first year programs may
support continuing someoutreach methods, streamlining workflows to exclusively use interlibrary loan as a request andfulfillment system, and the need to periodically train interlibrary loan staff. We also recommendthat discoverability of standards in our collection should be improved through catalogingimprovements and creation of finding aids for different audiences.IntroductionWhen designing something for human use, there is often a free-wheeling, creative phase that isunbounded by reality. However, at some point in the implementation of the design, constraintsbecome a part of the creator(s) process, whether it be the laws of physics, available materials, oran agreed-upon convention, ethical limit, or rule. Standards documents represent one form
-133, 2009. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/29734077.[6] B. M. Capobianco, "Undergraduate women engineering their professional identities" vol. 12, no. 2-3, pp. 95-117, 2006-08-30 2006, doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v12.i2- 3.10.[7] K. L. Meyers, M. Ohland, A. Pawley, S. Stephen, and K. Smith, Factors relating to engineering identity. 2012.[8] M. C. Loui, "Ethics and the Development of Professional Identities of Engineering Students," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 383-390, 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00866.x.[9] A. Rodriguez and M. P, Factors related to advanced course-taking patterns, persistence in science technology engineering and
education academy to evolve toinclude competency mastery” in engineering education programming in areas of continuouspersistence, ethical decision making and problem-solving [2]. A need exists for graduates inapplied sciences like engineering and technology education to acquire non-technical,transdisciplinary competencies like resilience. Problem solving, encountering and learning fromerror and engaging with team members with mature levels of emotional intelligence all requirepersistence [1], [2].Hernandez et al. in 2018 include resilience among top mental attitude and contextual responsesnecessary for retaining engineering students. Resilience competency attributes are practiced andtransferred into the engineering environment where one faces
Engineering andDesign (ENGR 104) course is a project based class that introduces students to the engineering design processand explores the role of creativity in design, team dynamics, 3D visualization, diversity of perspective, globalimpact of design, and ethics. All engineering and design students are required to take ENGR 104 as pre-majors, prior to applying to major. The majority of students take the course during their first year at WWU.The course is taught by a variety of instructors and has a class capacity of 50 students.The three interventions embedded into the course were 1) a collaborative activity establishing classroomnorms, 2) a mid-quarter activity engaging students with the concept of growth mindset, and 3) instructorconnection