Fig. 5), while viewing the scenes through one of the team leaders’ screens, without themselves intervening in the game through their own avatar (Fig. 3) ● The activity would be conducted in two rounds, with the intention that in the second round teams would be able to reflect on their mistakes in round one, and would be able to improve their planning process to reach a higher score. One of the key learnings in this exercise was the importance of the project
givingthem active, candid feedback, coaching, and mentoring on their effectiveness.The program has three “legs:” 1. An engineering leadership lab (ELL) where the students met weekly in small teams to face leadership challenges keyed to the “Capabilities of an Effective Leader” [see later in this paper], 2. An engineering leadership class (EL), synchronized to the lab, where the students study the academic background of the leadership areas prior to the related leadership lab, and also discuss and reflect on the lessons learned once the associated lab has taken place. 3. During our brainstorming period, the consensus was clear that an effective engineering leader must have a deep grounding in the technology which s/he
thinking to solve problems, it is important to measure systems thinking abilities.Various measurement and assessment strategies have been proposed to understand thedevelopment of systems thinking skills in engineering graduates and students. A few of theseinclude course-based systems thinking instruction followed by assessment using surveys, fieldreports, reflections, open-ended examinations, quizzes, etc. [4]–[6], [20], [21]. Other strategiesinclude cognitive mapping and concept mapping to explore how visualization techniques can aidthe consideration of multiple dimensions of systems thinking [3], [22]. Another approach, whichwill be the focus of this paper, uses scenario-based assessments of systems thinking skills [1],[2], [19], [23]. Some
Columbia University and assess its impact. An existingjunior mechanical engineering lab course was modified from a set of four pre-defined experimentsto a set of three experiments that provided increasing independence. In the third and finalexperiment, students conducted their own background research, proposed experiments, builtapparatuses, and tested their hypotheses.In general, the changes reflected a transition in the course from passive learning to active learning[2, 9]. Rather than having students passively absorb knowledge and reproduce it by following astep-by-step procedure, the course redesign had them actively pursue experimental knowledge. Inthe first nine weeks of the course, students were gradually trained to become
.* Correspondence: MiguelAndrés Guerra, MAGuerra@usfq.edu.ec.AbstractTraditional exams are widely used to assess students’ acquired knowledge inengineering courses, and although traditional exams have a purpose and a role, it is alsoknown that they bring different levels of stress and anxiety to students, which can resultin an inaccurate reflection of students’ knowledge or even poor performance. Althoughresearch shows this type of exam may not be adequate for all types of students, little isknown about how to improve traditional exam assessment experiences. This pilot studyaims to design an intervention—a coffee break during an exam—to help reducestudents’ stress and anxiety levels and improve their exam performance. To assess theintervention, the authors
progressive activity design was that at the endof the course, the students had a sense of belonging in the company and that they could proposeimprovements for the work of the companies.MethodologyThe first section of this paper offered a rationale for applying WIL in a graduate engineeringcourse. To understand the impact of this learning experience on the students, data from studentsurveys were collected at the end of the course. Data from three semesters were analyzed fromthe BIM in Construction course. The instrument mostly has open questions around the axes ofexperience with On-site Visits, Company interaction, Site-course alignment, and Reflection onthe course. Additionally, there were 2 closed questions, which were dedication and if they hadhad
tables and chairs. However, the university started believing "there is no front to an active classroom" and removed whiteboards and replaced them with glass boards in these active-learning classrooms. These boards were hard to write on and reflected the classroom lights. The boards also had limited writing space, even for short lectures. The first author moved the class to a "regular" auditorium with many more seats than students, for example, having 80 students in an auditorium that seats 140. The effectiveness of active learning did not suffer much. Leaving every other row vacant allowed the instructor and the teaching assistants to move around fully © American Society for
users are more likely to get useful results from theirPIV analysis based on their understanding of PIV algorithms and digital imaging parameters.Usually, this understanding is gained through several years of education and practice using PIV.For example, image background noise (i.e., leaving objects which appear in the imagebackground, allowing reflected light into the images, etc.) frequently leads to poor PIV images,and potentially inaccurate or even physically meaningless vector fields. An experienced PIV userunderstands this as the fact that substantial image background noise reduces the likelihood of thePIV algorithms finding a valid correlation peak. Lacking this knowledge, novice PIV users mayachieve poor PIV results due to the allowance
PBL development may bedaunting. Upon reflections from the students’ point of view, Colin Dixon and Lee MichaelMartin found out that the moments of uncertainty were the pivot points when the learners couldre-position themselves and others to express their opinions to direct their problem-solving planstoward features, resources, and practices that served their interests [2]. From the instructor’spoint of view, Yoshiki Sato, Atsuo Hazeyama, Shoichi Nakamura, and Youzou Miyadera did athorough analysis of the PBL Body of Knowledge (PBLBOK) framework [3], which outlines thePBL phases (Initializing, Planning, Executing, Monitoring, and Evaluating) and knowledge areas(Quality, Cost, Schedule, Risk, Communication, and Integration). Within this
improve accessibility and todemonstrate best practices in remote teaching [18]. The two-week format, as discussed in the SeminarSchedule Section, brings about the concern for participants to potentially forget information presentedduring the seminars on earlier days of the workshop. However, the increased length of the workshop mayallow for greater reflection on the seminar contents, which may improve long-term retention of theExCEEd Teaching Model and the skills and tips presented at the ETW. Lastly, the Task Committeebelieved ETW personnel should recap the seminar content with their teams at the end of workshop daysynchronously to ensure the participants stay on track. At a face-to-face workshop, these conversationshappen in the commute to and
]. Research Questions The purpose of this single case study is to explain how university affiliates explain theprocess of collaboration after the end of the second year of a partnership between a university,local industry partners, and educators in Southwest, Appalachian Virginia. The goals of thispartnership are to deliver hands-on engineering activities to rural middle school students throughintegrating engineering into the existing curriculum and standards of learning. Using a theory ofmultidimensional collaboration from Thomson and Perry [13], this study seeks to understandmore about the structures of collaboration, the role of each partner, the benefits of collaboration,and the overall goals and reflections about the partnership. This
employment after a wait period of over one year is not as successful. 3. The rating of their company or employer: The higher a person’s employer’s rating is, the more successful their employment is assumed to be. For example, having work experience at a Fortune 500 company is usually perceived as a sign of success16. A computing employment at a Fortune500 company is seen as more successful than one at a Non-Fortune500 company. 4. Their salary level: An employee’s salary level is usually reflective of the type of position they are employed in13,14,17. Within this research, a person with a low annual income (less than 50,000 USD) and a person with a medium annual income (between 50,000 and 100,000 USD) are
successful on exam questions about frequency response.7. What are the top three skills that the 3D3 Challenge helped you develop or improve? [Options:Conducting analysis, Communicating my ideas to others, Creative thinking, Critical thinking,Demonstrating leadership, Exploring self and belonging, Listening/reflecting, Problem-solving,Research experience, Understanding other perspectives.]8. What are the top three skills that you still feel challenged the most? [Options: Conductinganalysis, Communicating my ideas to others, Creative thinking, Critical thinking, Demonstratingleadership, Exploring self and belonging, Listening/reflecting, Problem-solving, Researchexperience, Understanding other perspectives.]9. Which elements of the 3D3 Challenge had
Department and CECS. Students were asked to reflect on the aspects of the program whichthey enjoyed the most. One student stated that the piloted program served as a medium to establishnew acquaintances, particularly the new cohort, before the start of the semester. The followingstatements illustrate students’ overall appreciation of the onboarding program: “Meeting with new people and teams” “Student engagement and discussion” “Working with different people and new projects every day” “The rotation of activities was perfect since we could learn a little bit of everything and motivated us to learn more about the mechanical engineering field”As disclosed by the feedback, it was evident that the incoming class enjoyed
paper-folded model and drawing. Participants were then askedto reflect upon their attempts at creating these models and bring their thoughts to the nextsynchronous session.Last, “Extend” activities were intended to be completed after the synchronous sessions onFridays. Participants were encouraged to use what they learned throughout the entire week tocomplete a new activity related to paper folding, drawing, or spatial ability. For example, oneweek, students were required to follow instructions about creating their own pop-up book usingmaterials provided in their kits. Another week, they folded a new origami model that was notcovered in the guided instructions.Participants and data collectionParticipants in the EQ program included BLV youth in
Engineering Research Center’s culture of inclusion scale as the mostrobust of scales that met our parameters [12].The CELL-MET COI Scale was based on a review of relevant literature within multidisciplinaryscholarship, including community psychology, organizational psychology, STEM educationevaluation, and workforce diversity and inclusion [13]–[20]. This review helped identifyrelevant constructs and existing surveys, including psychological sense of community, groupdynamics, and workforce diversity engagement. The COI scale items were then selected fromexisting scales measuring the targeted constructs and adapted for the CELL-MET context. Thescale consisted of 14 items reflecting the core components of an inclusive climate within anengineering
outcomes to better prepare our engineering graduates to enter the professionalengineering workforce post graduation, including “an ability to function effectively on a teamwhose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment,establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives” [8]. Representation of women in STEM shouldnot only be reflective of the larger population but should also include representation acrossleadership levels to best improve progress towards global competitiveness.With the increased focus on relevant teamwork experiences in engineering undergraduateprograms comes a focus on how to navigate team dynamics and students’ roles on project teams.Specifically, faculty are curious on how to evaluate
students consistently had difficulty defining andmeasuring performance of hardware and software systems as well as being able to rapidlyprototype and iteratively develop such systems. As the team met over the summer reflecting onareas the existing second year design course was seeing successes, areas where it could beimproved, and thinking through how to make the overall design thread more coherent forstudents five course learning objectives were developed: 1) learn to create electronic devices that perform functions, 2) learn system design and problem abstraction, 3) learn to debug and test electronic devices in hardware and software, 4) acquire, analyze, and professionally present data, and 5) independently acquire information
Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Purdue University. She was an inaugural faculty member of the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and now leads the Discipline-Based Education Research Initiative in the College of Engineering at UNL. Her research focuses on the development, implementation, and assessment of modeling and design activities with authentic engineering contexts. She also focuses on the implementation of learning objective-based grading and reflection. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Engineering Instructor Experience During Emergency Remote
theirattention, as reflected in the two quotes below:“You're constantly thinking and not just forgetting everything you're learning until the end, likeevery…like every section is like a little preview in the end…”“I did kind of think it through and just make sure I was understanding the whole concept of it.”In addition, students reported becoming more interested in the content. They described the videocontent as a preview of what they can accomplish beyond the course on student projects. It madethem want to “dig deeper” and find more information related to the content, as reflected in thefollowing quotes:“I searched things up after because they became interesting to me after the quizzes. It kind of puta light bulb on my head as I moved on. Yeah kind of
8-week intervention period. The survey collected their perceptions regardingan innovative teaching method used for the laboratory course. The pre-and-post comparisonallows for contrasting student opinions in three main areas: type of instruction, teachingstrategies, and student response to the instruction. The study presents some of the laboratoryactivities' outcomes and limitations. One specific activity, the capacitor discharge experiment,will be thoroughly discussed to compare the traditional physical setup with the technology-basedversion. Findings highlight the pros and cons of the teaching method used and reflect on what hasbeen learned. It also suggests potential next steps for further improvement.Keywords: Physics laboratory course
identification have been identified as strengths among individuals withautism [30, 31].CodeWithin epistemic communities, code represents the language, drawn from theory, that supportsepistemic community members in understanding and interpreting experiences. The codes offercommunity members a common way of communicating about their experiences and observationsor for examining or reflecting on their experiences [20]. In the engineering department, a codeshift was made possible through the introduction of specific language that framed neurodiversityas an asset; this change in language usage was in stark contrast to previous use of language thatreflected a framing of neurological variations as cognitive disorders.The most important example of the code used
Design, Design Thinking, and Systems Thinking; and "Computer-AidedEngineering", an elective course for juniors and seniors.In general, it is not unexpected that both design frameworks have a comparable approach andpossess features typically present in all design processes. Some of these similarities are:● Both are iterative, adaptive, and collaborative processes that help solve ill-defined and open-ended problems that are not amenable to being routinized or solved algorithmically (aka “puzzles”). The iterative and nonlinear nature of both design methodologies is reflected in the existent feedback loops. This iterative nature can also be viewed as coevolution of the problem space with the solution space. That is, as designers search for
by Dr. Miriam Sweeney of the School of Library and Information Science atthe University of Alabama) to engage participants in the histories, politics, and socialconsequences of engineering (and other technical fields), 4) completing the self-guided HallowedGround Project (developed by Dr. Hilary Green) , and 5) a final written reflection on theirexperiences guided as a "3-2-1" writing prompt (What are 3 things that have left an impressionon you from your time [participating in these activities]? What are 2 impacts that you think thesehistories continue to have on education? What is 1 thing you would want to learn more aboutrelated to these topics?).From the final focus group in 2022, the students reported that the prompt to reflect on
pointwhere we delved into its cause for close to a week. We found that the error in terminal velocitycorrelated to velocity squared of the flywheel. We hypothesized that the reason was aerodynamicdrag, and then confirmed this by operating the system with a flywheel of similar mass propertiesbut a streamlined shape. Upon reflection, we realized that a key educational goal was for to elicita similar level of curiosity and for them to engage in inquisitive discovery. In winter 2023 weidentified curiosity as an explicit educational objective of the class and structured the coursematerial accordingly. We felt that imparting a sense of curiosity and investigation would be ofmore benefit to the students than developing an additional mechatronic skills, as
Introduction Week 2 Technology Training Week 3 Healthy relationship building Week 4 Time management Week 5 Resume Writing and Job Interview Preparation Week 6 Invited Guest Speaker from local industry Week 7 Influencing People Week 8 Leadership & Delegation Week 9 Project Progress Report Week 10 Entrepreneurship Week 11 Accountancy & Budgeting Week 12 Diversity & Gender issues in professions Week 13 Health & Safety Week 14 Field trip Week 15 Project PresentationsProject-based Work Studio environmentExperiential learning incorporates hands-on learning and reflection on learning [23]. A principalchallenge that STEM
which an operational measure reflects the concept being investigated (Netemeyer etal., 2003). Articles using standard quantitative research methods were further coded into 12 broadcategories and 73 subcategories. The list of categories, including types of quantitative research,quantitative study design, data source, data type, and quantitative methods used, are summarizedin Table 1. These standard quantitative research articles were further coded for study design, datasource, data type, and quantitative methods used to analyze the data. Study designs includerandomized control trials (RCT), quasi-experimental, assessment validation, and correlational.RCT is defined as an experiment under controlled conditions to demonstrate a known truth
manager training, and partner development. These business achievements are reflected in his aca- demic activities through the designing of lectures and mobility programs with practical implementation perspectives. Ishizaki has been actively presenting and publishing his academic achievements at interna- tional conferences in the Asia Pacific region and North America such as APAIE, WERA, and NAFSA. He earned a Master of Business Administration majoring in international business at the University of Southern California in the United States of America, and a Bachelor in Law at Hitotsubashi University in Japan.Dr. Sumito Nagasawa, Shibaura Institute of Technology Dr. Sumito Nagasawa received Ph.D. in Engineering from the
broader discussion and reflection of how the findings might inform futurealliance efforts.c. Future Work As the Project ELEVATE Alliance institutions have recruited the first cohort of mentorsand mentees, we are in the process of scheduling the mentor training sessions through theCIMER. This training will occur in Spring 2023 and will consist of four 1.5 hour sessionsutilizing CIMER Entering Mentoring curriculum with a focus on mentorship of junior faculty.Discussion and case studies will center DEI concepts and skills in this training. We will also bepreparing for the Project ELEVATE Summer Retreat, to be held in June 2023. This retreat is animportant event in our community building and will create and sustain cohorts and affinitynetworks
ensuring communicative effectiveness of our end product.Theoretical Framework: Figured Worlds and Narrative AgencyIn their seminal work, Holland and colleagues (1998) conceptualized the complex interactionsbetween social systems and individuals as agency and identity formation in figured worlds. Theydefine this concept as the realized capacity for an individual to purposefully and reflectively act(i.e., agency) on contexts containing “socially-produced, culturally-constructed activities” (i.e.,figured worlds, Holland et al., 1998, p. 40-41). As individuals iteratively interact with and withinthese figured worlds, they make meaning of themselves and form their identities. Figured worldsinclude four characteristics: (1) they are historically