, respectively. In summer 2009, Simeon Trieu, one of Prof. Jin’s graduatestudents, was awarded an NSF EAPSI summer and he also won the 1st place CSU researchcompetition on graduate engineering and computer engineering level in 2010, because ofworking on the project. Now Prof. Jin is supported by 1) NSF Grant OISE Award #1029135from year 2010 to 2013 and 2) Chinese National Key Research Lab Collaboration Grant 2010-2011 and 2011-2012. Those grants enable the Prof. Jin to bring more US students to work inChina. Since 2012, our new goal is to let students in both countries to freely choose theirresearch topics and their advisers. This paper will discuss how those activities are running in thepast years and what the key issues of the program are. The paper
Year Fig. 1. Enrollment for IMSE 564.2. Creation of the learner-centered environment in IMSE 564Learner-centered education was developed a long time ago, and it continues to take on differentshapes 2. The distinguishing characteristics of a learner-centered method are 3-5: • Curriculum based on learners’ needs; • Learners’ responsibility for contributing to their own learning; • Teacher's role as facilitator to guide education experience; • Group activities for practice and learning reinforcement; • Stimulus for discovery and self-learning; • Opportunities for discourse; • Stimulus for inner discipline; • Project-based learning; • Basis for learning throughout life.The
Civil and Environmental Engineering Michigan Technological University Houghton, Michigan 49931 mattila@mtu.edu (906) 487-2523 phone (906) 487-2943 fax 4 Todd Scholz, Assistant Professor Civil and Environmental Engineering Michigan Technological University Houghton, Michigan 49931 scholz@mtu.edu (906) 487-2804 phone (906) 487-2943 faxABSTRACTIn the fall semester of 2000 a student program was established at Michigan TechnologicalUniversity in which significant team projects and business elements replace part of thetraditional engineering curriculum for a project-based approach to learning. Scholarships areavailable to students who participate in the Pavement Design
, video and audio tools. Implementation The proposed teaching tool, VisuaLearning, was used to teach a construction engineering management course, CEM 121 Construction Drawings, offered at the Department of Civil Engineering and Construction Engineering Management at California State University, Long Beach. Figure 1 shows a typical screen shot of VisuaLearning, in which texts, 3D images, video clips, and drawings are entered as illustrative visualizations for the foundations of a residential construction project to be covered in the course CEM 121. After going over the learning materials for a particular subject (e.g. Graphic Vocabulary), students are prompted to answer Proceedings of the 2011 PSW American Society for
An Automated Natural Gas Shut-Off Valve System Benjamin Cadieux Lee Denaro Paul Ellsworth Adam Robert Salah Badjou, Ph.D. Department of Electronics and Mechanical Wentworth Institute of Technology, Boston, MA 02115 Session Topic: Teaching project based courses and design courses, including senior design course AbstractThere is no system on the market today that monitors a building or house for natural
IEEEclub, followed by a special lecture in the "Introduction to Computer Engineering" course, wherestudents worked on projects involving the mentor's design materials. This mentoring approach,integrated into the course structure, inspired students and helped them envision their futurecareers in engineering. The paper concludes that combining storytelling and the mentor's uniqueexperiences within a course can significantly benefit students and faculty. IntroductionAll educational activities in universities can be defined by various elements, and among these,the importance of mentoring has been widely discussed. Mentoring encompasses componentssuch as academic and professional development, personal support
Global Engineering Competence Pillar 3: Integrating Engineering Knowledge with Essential Business Skills Pillar 4: Building Effective Leaders and CommunicatorsThe second pillar, nurturing global engineering competence, is primarily achieved through arequired international engineering field experience. Global Engineering (EGE 320) was firstoffered in the Spring of 2013 and until the Spring of 2020 had taken every engineering student atthe University to an international destination to work on community-centered engineeringprojects.The four-credit hour Global Engineering course is a combination of lecture, project work, andfield experience. While these three components have always been a part of the class, the ratio oftime spent on each has
Northeastern University to focus on teaching and developing curriculum in the First Year Engineering program. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 What to Teach First, Hardware or Software? Improving Success in Introductory Programming CoursesAbstractThis complete evidence-based practice paper presents an analysis and lessons learned inintroductory engineering courses with content that includes problem-solving, algorithmic thinking,the use of microcontrollers, and C++ at a medium-sized private urban university. These coursesspecifically incorporate the integration of hands-on, project-based design projects with computerprogramming. The goal of the project work is to provide an
Associate Director for Research and Operations of the Interprofessional (IPRO) program. He was brought in specifically to focus on IPRO courses, and has led over 50 IPRO project teams in the past four years. He has an undergraduate degree in liberal arts and mechnical engineering, and graduate degrees in Business and Industrial Engineering. For over 20 years he led consulting businesses specializing in financial and information process design and improvement, professional training/education for industry, market research and professional publications. He has been instrumental in implementing many of the assessment processes and interventions now used by the IPRO program. He also
demonstrate when managing a global team. Thefollowing diagram10 translates each competency into specific skills that would be used by aglobal leader. Identify the key skills in the global team and utilize them such that you get the most value from the project: ≠ Which area is the best match for these skills? ≠ By whom are these skills offered?≠ Manage the ≠ Understand & global resources Manage Value in manage the different effectively and an Ecosystem of specializations in the
provide PD that aligns to The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Since 2008 she has provided teacher PD to science teachers in the tri-state area, including international visiting teachers and scholars. Dr. Borges’ research interests include: building STEM professional-teacher relationships, diversity and equity, and enhancing urban science teaching and learning.Dr. Vikram Kapila, New York University Vikram Kapila is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics, Controls, and Robotics Laboratory, a Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a DR K-12 research project, and an ITEST re- search project
engineering. Block play and building structures likebridges and ramps, a natural beginning to engineering thinking as children construct, test thelimits of, revise, and rebuild their structures, was a common occurrence in this preschool. Forteachers who are beginning to learn about and implement the engineering design process (EDP),long-term projects that bring children though a full design process is ideal so the EDP is notovershadowed by children excited with short-term, hands-on activities. As such, the researchquestion guiding this study was: How does preschool teachers’ knowledge of and confidencewith teaching the EDP evolve over the course of a long-term engineering project? The preschoolteachers were guided by the researcher to explicitly
may be a useful means to introduce valuable engineering skills. Aservice-learning course structure developed to achieve engineering skill development ispresented along with course evaluation data from the first semester of its implementation.A problem-based course model [2] is used to demonstrate service-learning’s potential. Courseoutcomes aim to provide project management and engineering skills. An evaluation wascompleted using an adapted form of Gelmon et al. [3] pre- and post- test service-learning surveyto better understand student perceptions of the course on 1. Engineering skills, 2. Learning, 3.Aspirations, and 4. Social responsibility. The data suggests that students who completed boththe pre- and post- surveys thought the course was
survey of United States chemical engineering curricula shows that a relatively small number ofdepartments offer their first-year students a laboratory experience focused on core chemicalengineering concepts using hands-on design projects. Furthermore, the first-year chemistry andphysics laboratories taken by engineering students do not typically ask them to exercise the typeof creativity that attracted students to engineering in the first place.In order to bring more active, collaborative, and hands-on learning into our curriculum, wecreated a freshman chemical engineering design course and laboratory. This course is situated inthe second semester of our curriculum, after a more traditional lecture-based introduction tochemical engineering
. Julie P Martin, Clemson University Julie P. Martin, Ph.D. is an associate professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson Univer- sity. Her research agenda has focused on diversity and inclusion in engineering education. In particular, her NSF-funded CAREER work has investigated how social relations—operationalized as social capi- tal—influence student academic decisions and success, especially for underrepresented and underserved students. Her CAREER research supports the need for continued proactive outreach, educational and support systems that have the potential to form ”resource-rich” networks in which students receive infor- mation and resources in routine exchanges. Dr. Martin’s current projects
- sign and Engineering). His engineering design research focuses on developing computational represen- tation and reasoning support for managing complex system design. The goal of Dr. Morkos’ research is to fundamentally reframe our understanding and utilization of system representations and computational reasoning capabilities to support the development of system models which help engineers and project planners intelligently make informed decisions at earlier stages of engineering design. On the engineer- ing education front, Dr. Morkos’ research explores means to integrate innovation and entrepreneurship in engineering education through entrepreneurially-minded learning, improve persistence in engineering, address
to discuss the assessmentplan, set performance standards, discuss the assessment results, and suggest improvements to thecourse.Step 1: Defining E101’s Mission, Objectives and OutcomesAssessment of E101 began formally in the fall of 2001, by the faculty defining the course goalsand outcomes (See Table 1). In this case, the overall goal of the course can be seen as its mission. Table 1: Goals and Learning Objectives of the E101 Course, Fall 2001 Goals and Objectives of the Course: This course is designed to introduce students to the field of Engineering and the study of Engineering. Objective: Students will be able to integrate computer usage, teamwork, problem solving, and verbal/written language into a design project within the
rating and the average of ratings from all three peer reviewers.III. CPR and the Assessment of Learning through WritingCPR -- as an advanced form of educational technology -- partners both with the student and withthe instructor to foster learning. In this project, through the vehicle of CPR, we were able toimplement assignments that fully utilize the “writing across the curriculum” (WAC) pedagogy [3- 6], without overly increasing the workload for instructors. Furthermore, CPR’s ability both toelicit and to report qualitative and quantitative peer review helps to make formative assessmentan integral part of instruction. And, the data collected by CPR during the student’s process ofengaging the
AC 2012-5358: WORK-IN-PROGRESS: INTEGRATION OF HANDS-ONCOMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (CFD) IN UNDERGRADUATE CUR-RICULUMDr. Yogendra M. Panta, Youngstown State University Yogen Panta is an Assistant Professor of mechanical engineering at Youngstown State University, Ohio. He has been teaching and developing courses and research projects in the fluid thermal area. He is cur- rently conducting applied research in thermo-fluids and computational fluid dynamics with local indus- tries and federal agencies. Panta received a B.E. degree from Tribhuvan University, an M.S. degree from Youngstown State University, and a Ph.D. degree from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Panta’s research interests are in fluid dynamics
incremental concrete experiences with the methods. Nor do such courses allow for suitable observation and reflection as the methods are executed. In this paper, we describe a new approach for teaching design methods which addresses these issues. This approach incorporates hands-on experiences through the use of “reverse-engineering” projects. As the fundamentals of design techniques are presented, students immediately apply the methods to actual, existing products. They are able to hold these products physically in their hands, dissect them, perform experiments on their components, and evolve them into new successful creations. Based on this reverse-engineering concept, we have developed and tested new
of Young People in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)AbstractThis paper describes a new collaboration between a DOD government institution of highereducation in the United States and the History Center of the Institute of Electrical andElectronics Engineers (IEEE), the world’s largest technology organization for the advancementof technology, to create a workforce development and one-on-one career-building and life-changing mentorship program for female undergraduate students in science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM). This project provides the students with hands-onSTEM research in the government institution and one-on-one exposure to some of the world’sleading female science and engineering
Paper ID #40331Challenges in Designing Complex Engineering Problems to Meet ABETOutcome 1Dr. Bijan G Mobasseri, Villanova UniveristyMs. Liesl Klein, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Liesl Krause-Klein is a assistant teaching professor at Villanova University in their electrical and computer engineering department. She graduated from Purdue University’s Polytechnic institute in 2022. Her research focused on student well-being. She is currently in charge of curriculum for capstone projects within her department.Mr. Edward Stephen Char Jr., Villanova University BS EE Villanova University 1996 MS EE Villanova
LearnersAbstractThe Mechanics of Materials course has been offered in a “flipped” modality over the past 8years. This course is an entry-level course required for several engineering majors such as Civil,Mechanical, Biomedical, Materials Science, and Manufacturing Engineering. The class haslarge enrollments of 100 to 120 students per section and an annual enrollment of 400 students.In the flipped course, the lectures were being delivered using pre-recorded videos. The in-personclass time was used to present a brief recitation of the lecture material, discuss challengingconcepts, and solve problems.The course was redesigned in the summer of 2020 as part of a research project funded by theEngineering Education Center of the National Science Foundation to
]. Students from cultures and groups underrepresented in STEM may experience moretrouble navigating the differences between their home culture and culture of science thanstudents from well-represented groups [3, 4]. This can lead to difficulties in STEM achievement,even when there is existing interest [5]. For female learners in particular, developing andretaining their interest in the STEM classroom is critical to diversifying the engineeringworkforce [6]. Women are still underrepresented in the STEM workforce, yet a diverse pool oftalent with strong STEM knowledge and skills is vital for maintaining the US innovation base [7,8]. The National Science Foundation (NSF) funded the Engineering for US All (e4usa) project in2018 partly in recognition of
control and estimation theory, artificial intelligence and machine learning, and cognitive systems. Dr. Gadsden completed his Bachelors in Mechanical Engineering and Management (Business) and then earned his PhD in Mechanical Engineering at McMaster in the area of estimation the- ory with applications to mechatronics and aerospace systems. He worked as a postdoctoral researcher for nearly three years at the Centre for Mechatronics and Hybrid Technology (Hamilton, Ontario). He also worked concurrently as a Project Manager in the pharmaceutical industry (Apotex Inc., Toronto, Ontario). Before joining McMaster University, Dr. Gadsden was an Associate/Assistant Professor at the University of Guelph and an Assistant
2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Pro- gram Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS.Dr. Kenneth Reid, University of Indianapolis Kenneth Reid is the Associate Dean and Director of Engineering at the R. B. Annis School of Engineering at the University of Indianapolis. He and his coauthors were awarded the Wickenden award (Journal of Engineering Education, 2014) and Best Paper award, Educational Research and Methods Division (ASEE, 2014). He was awarded an IEEE-USA Professional Achievement Award (2013) for designing the B.S. degree in Engineering Education. He is a co-PI on the ”Engineering for Us All” (e4usa) project to develop a high school
universities such as Purdue University, University of Puerto Rico, University of South Florida,and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Some of them end up working for US Corps ofEngineers national laboratories (Acosta, 2004).Involvement in Undergraduate Research Experiences (URE) is related to considerably increasedpersistence and improved academic performance of students in science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) disciplines. UREs have shown to promote students’ sense of project ownership,self-effectiveness, and scientific identity. The advantages derived from URE have a very good impact onminority students and their improved STEM retention (Vater, 2019).Case Studies:Case study 1: University of Cincinnati Structural
, New York. At DiLab Catalina teaches and coordi- nates the Engineering Challenges course which aims to initiate freshmen students in to engineering design practices by encouraging students to develop a project following a user-centered design process. She also teaches Visual Thinking, the exploratory course of the Major in Engineering, Design, and Innovation. This course addresses the theories and ideas that sustain the visual thinking process as well as method- ologies and practical implementation of visual representation through infographics, computer graphics, and physical computing. The course focus on representing the narrative of the findings using visual tools. Catalina has been directing FabLabUC
regarding “team performance” or “team dynamics,” typically assessedthrough measures of team communication, leadership, and project management. The pervasiveassumption underlying much of this research is that effective team functioning results ineffective innovation outcomes. Yet, the relationship between team dynamics and innovationoutcomes has not been well studied. Most of the existing research does not assess theeffectiveness of the final product of teamwork, nor does most existing research examineinnovation outcomes in relation to team functioning. In this paper, we examine the relationshipbetween team dynamics and innovation outcomes. Using an entrepreneurial simulation in anupper division thermodynamics course, this mixed-methods study
Lecturer and is the recipient of the Fulton Outstanding Lecturer Award. She focuses on designing the curriculum and teaching in the freshman engineering pro- gram. She is also involved in the NAE Grand Challenges Scholars Program, the ASU ProMod project, the Engineering Projects in Community Service program, the Engineering Futures program, the Global Freshman Academy/Earned Admission Program, and the ASU Kern Project. Dr. Zhu also designs and teaches courses in mechanical engineering at ASU, including Statics, Mechanics of Materials, Mechan- ical Design, Mechanism Analysis and Design, Finite Element Analysis, etc. She was a part of the team that designed a largely team and activity based online Introduction to