support from A Scholarship Program to Increase Retention in Engineering (ASPIRE):Improving Work-Study-Life Balance. The goal of the program was to increase retention ofsophomore and junior engineering students who show academic promise but are at risk of notcompleting their studies due to financial concerns and/or life-work-study balance issues. Inaddition to financial support, ASPIRE provided scholarship recipients with opportunities toparticipate in activities that contribute to persistence such as tutoring, faculty mentoring,conferences, presentations and career planning workshops. Sixty-one students have beenawarded scholarships in this five-year period.This paper examines the effectiveness of ASPIRE to help students alleviate financial
decision was made to implementthe changes proposed by the USMA faculty at the 2017 ASEE conference, with assistance fromWest Point. The question this paper strives to answer is: can a similar course redesign producesimilar results at another institution, that in many respects is very different from the US MilitaryAcademy? Essentially, is the West Point redesign reproducible and the results replicable and ifso, under what conditions? It is also an aim of this paper to present the challenges, issues, andsuccesses of implementing this plan with the objective of aiding other programs who might wantto incorporate the ideas originally detailed by faculty from the US Military Academy in theirengineering mechanics sequence redesign.The motivation
feedback. Changes in theseconstructs were measured using paired samples t-tests. Additionally, the same statisticaltechnique was applied to measure the change in current and planned future use of each of thethree strategies, which was reported as a single item question on a four-point Likert scale fromthe participants. These changes were then calculated as percentage changes for ease ofinterpretation. As shown in Figure 5, there were statistically significant increases in expectancy(or faculty expectations of successful implementation) and value with respect to implementingreal-world applications in the classroom as well as statistically significant decrease in the costrelated when comparing responses prior to and after faculty development
surgery planning. Since July 2011, he has been employed as assistant professor in Old Dominion University’s Department of Modeling, Simulation and Visualization Engineering. His research interests include medical simulation, medical image analysis, therapy planning, all three with an emphasis on neuro- and orthopedic surgery, as well as other clinical applications of musculoskeletal modeling, in addition to imaging and simulation applications for military well-being.Dr. Vukica M. Jovanovic, Old Dominion University Dr. Vukica Jovanovic is an Associate Professor of Engineering Technology in Mechanical Engineering Technology Program. She holds a Ph.D. from Purdue University in Mechanical Engineering Technology, focus
; a review ofTable 1. Schedule for class and laboratory. Week Class Lecture/Lab Section 1 1 1 Syllabus, Review of Mechanics 2 2 Circuits / Ohms law 3 Data acquisition / Signals and sampling 3 4 Planning a Monitoring program / Uncertainty / Accuracy 5 Strain Sensors / Vibrating wire gages 4 6 Foil Gages, theory and installation Section 2 7 Foil Gages, selection and voltage 5 8 Fiber optics / Load cells 9 Piezometers / Linear deformation
for the middle school and high school competitions are provided on theproject website. The teams were selected through a selective application process.Teachers were made aware of the program through project presentations at variousconferences and individual schools. The project has expanded to Maryland and plans toinvolve more states in the future. Figure 3 Undergraduate Research Scholars Volunteer at the Competition 2016Middle School Competition The purpose of the middle school competition is to allow students to work as partof a team to demonstrate their knowledge of alternative transportation systems by testing,modifying, and demonstrating a functional model electric car and solar charging station.For the competition
agenda Session 3 Report Out and Participants shared the highlights of their group’s Workshop Evaluation discussions and were then asked to complete online surveys about their experiences in the workshop. Workshop organizers closed the workshop with a discussion about the insights and ideas participants had shared during the event and plans for dissemination.Description of Preliminary Research AgendaResults from the first day of sessions yielded a wealth of data related to each of the three themes. Thisdata was further analyzed
Paper ID #17895The Role of High School Math and Science Course Access in Student CollegeEngineering Major Choice and Degree AttainmentDr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Joyce B. Main is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Dr. Rajeev Darolia, University of Missouri Rajeev Darolia is Assistant Professor and Director of Research of the Institute of Public Policy at the
Paper ID #17915Diversity across Engineering Disciplines: Factors that Influence Student En-gineering Major ChoiceDr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Joyce B. Main is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Dr. Amanda L Griffith, Wake Forest UniversityXinrui (Rose) Xu, Purdue University Xinrui (Rose) Xu is a currently a doctoral student in the School of Engineering
pleasedto note that many lively conversations occurred in planned breaks and social events we hadincluded on the program, with shifting perspectives and new collaborations emerging for manyof the participants along the way. In this paper, we report only on the formally structured aspectsof the event. We developed five threads (themes); all components of the conference schedule(including pre-conference communication and during-conference activities) were aligned withthese threads. The five threads were informed by the theory-methods-research questions triangle(figure 1) along with Booth, Colomb, and Williams’s (2008) innovation cycle of educationalresearch and practice (figure 2).Conference threads: 1. What theories inform your work? 2. What
participants who received the scholarship in all three majors weremore diverse in their typological preference. In other words, the participants were moreentrepreneurial, highly detailed, empathetic engineers, a goal of the Engineer of 2020. Resultsfrom the focus groups showed that the professional activities were valued, but social activitieswere valued more. These findings became clearer in the focus group sessions where studentsindicated that the social activities allowed time for scholars to make social connections acrossacademic disciplines. While much has been learned through approaching gender and intellectualdiversity, much work remains before sustainable progress is made. Plans are now being developedto strengthen the program by incorporating
products. The second week concludes with brief student presentations and awardof certificates. Students normally comment on their favorite learning experience during theworkshop and how what they learned might impact their future career plans. Table 1 shows the2017 workshop schedule.The following paragraphs provide brief descriptions of the 2017workshop sessions.Biology – The biology workshop included four topics crime scene investigation, food color,robotics and nanotechnology. During the crime scene investigation topic students learned howbiology helps in solving crimes and identifying suspects using DNA and enzymes. The secondtopic discussed was food coloring and the advantages/disadvantages of naturally occurringversus artificially created
the word is key.For our own efforts, we plan to continue using these surveys to build more knowledge about ourstudents and inform how we can support them best. For self-efficacy, we plan to calculate thechange in response (e.g. from neutral (3) to agree (4)) and do a mixed mode ANOVA on theseresults to see whether there are large or small increases/decreases in self-efficacy. Forintimidation by programming, we plan to identify those students (men and women) who havetaken both Course 1 and Course 2 and analyze their responses at the four times (beginning andend of each term) to gain a clearer understanding of how students progress through thisprogramming sequence. For inclusion, we plan to move away from gender differences and beginto look at
instructor in Engineering Science at Penn State. Erdman has chaired the local Jaycees, Department of Social Services Advisory Council, GE Share Board, and Curling Club; and served on the Human Services Planning Council, United Way, Chamber of Commerce, and Capital Fund Drive Boards of Directors. Erdman has also lectured on leadership topics at Penn State and RPI. He returned to campus frequently as a recruiter (25 years) for GE and Lockheed Martin, serving on the Penn State College of Engineering Advisory Council, helped establish an Alumni Advisory Board, and served as the President of the College of Engineering Alumni Society. Affiliations include the Penn State Alumni Association, Centre County Chapter Board of
were also investigated based on high school preparedness, path to CM as amajor, self-efficacy, institutional and curriculum satisfaction, and future career plans. Parentaleducational level (i.e., completed a bachelor’s) is used as a measure of first-generation college student.The measure of high school preparedness evaluates students’ math and science experience. For instance,students respond to semester of math in high school, math/science course completed, whether advancedplacement courses were offered, and perceived college math preparedness. Students indicated their pathstudents followed to CM major, institutional and curriculum, and future plans. Most of the measuresused multiple choice survey options while others, such as self-efficacy
. ElZomor has been integrating innovative and novel educational paradigms in STEM education to support student engagement, retention, and diversity.Prof. Omar Youssef, University of Arizona Dr. Omar Youssef is a Lecturer at University of Arizona (UofA), College of Architecture, Planning, and Landscape Architecture, and the School of Sustainable Built Environments. A Building Scientist in the Institute on Place and Wellbeing Performance. An Architect in Practice focusing on Environmental Ap- plication within the Industry. Dr. Youssef has extensive industry experience of constructed large-scale projects. Omar’s interdisciplinary background combines between Architecture Practice, Environmental Sciences, Health and
competitions, and to raise parent and community awareness of securityissues through k-12 schools. It is our hope that the activities planned and presented inthe model will pave the path for reaching our ultimate goal of increasing the number ofstudents interested in pursuing cybersecurity as a future career.2. Cybersecurity Education in K-12In response to the gap in cybersecurity workforce and talent, colleges and universitieshave started offering cybersecurity degrees [2]. However, it is our belief that a long-term solution to the cybersecurity workforce is to start educating students about thosetopics at early age. Surely the K-12 cybersecurity program should provide students withvaluable learning experiences. One of the shortcomings in K-12
100-square milesolar farm, calculate the cost of building and running it, and compare the results to the energyneeds of their state. Web links and worksheets included in lesson materials. Plan Your Solar Home (9th-12th grade, 4 hours): In this math intensive lesson, studentsinvestigate their current home energy usage and cost. They conduct a DIY Energy Audit, thenwork in groups to identify ways to reduce electricity use. Students redesign their home to includephotovoltaics, physical changes, and behavior changes. The Solar Shuffle (6th-12th grade, 45 minutes): After learning how solar panels work,students are challenged to represent the process of how a solar panel works by collaborativelycreating a physical demonstration of
, along with Dr. Richard Felder and Dr. Ronald Rousseau, of the 4th edition of Chemical Process Principles. Dr. Bullard’s research interests lie in the area of educational scholarship, including teaching and advising effectiveness, academic integrity, process design instruction, and the integration of writing, speaking, and computing within the curriculum.Mr. Christopher C. Willis, North Carolina State University - DELTA Chris Willis, DELTA’s Assistant Director, Planning and Assessment, manages the evaluation and assess- ment of course redesign and educational technology projects, focusing on technology integration, peda- gogy, and teaching best practices to support student success and engagement. He manages data
to be more innovative in their plans to incorporateIoT-based energy monitoring and building automation into their math and science courses thanthe first summer cohort.Version 2 - Medium, classroom version used by all students Simultaneously with the design of Version 1, a second capstone design team was taskedto create a medium scale IoT House that focused more on the monitoring and control of thestructure. The model that this team created was intended to be a “one-of” resource that could bebuilt for a classroom where multiple student teams would have the ability to instrument, monitorand control more aspects of the structure. For example, this design included a fully functionalheating and air conditioning system with associated
range of undergraduate students and enhance mechanics education,the authors plan to integrate the reported 3D printing into his Solid Mechanics courses in Fall2019. Except of using nanoparticles enhanced 3D printing materials, the low-cost pristine PLAand ABS filaments will be used for the 3D printing of samples following the ASTM standards.The authors plan to adjust key 3D printing parameters, such as printing direction, to tailor thestrength and stiffness of the printed materials. Since both standard mechanical testing methodsand theories are introduced in Solid Mechanics and Solid Mechanics Lab courses, the testing of3D printed samples, such as dogbone samples under tensile loads, will imporve the students’understanding of critical solid
. Compare and contrast the contributions of different types of engineers in the development of a product, process, or system 2. Develop a plan of study for your undergraduate career 3. Articulate holistic issues that impact engineering solutions 4. Solve problems using systematic engineering approaches and tools 5. Model an engineering system 6. Synthesize information from several sources 7. Communicate information effectively 8. Contribute effectively to an engineering teamAs might be expected, balancing coverage of these learning outcomes with the expectations of atwo-credit introductory level course can be challenging for instructors. Many students enter theprogram with expectations that the course’s primary purpose is to help
for interaction of multiple genetic, chemical, electrical,Engineering Ethics and Society (CEES), the and neurohormonal factors that interact with eachother and with environmental and sociocultural planning and creating strategies, performingfactors. From this dynamic interaction, biological movements, and using language [10-12-13].processes emerge that condition thoughts, emotionsand behaviors through a multiplicity of channels The action of neurotransmitters in the organismthat tend to self-organize spontaneously and in ways does not always function in the same way.that are difficult to predict [6-7]. Sometimes, some neurotransmitters are more
byparents in planning and preparing for their young people’s careers. CM is adolescents’perceptions of their parents’ career-related modeling behavior. ES is adolescents’ perceptions oftheir parents’ attention to the affect they experience about educational and career developmentissues. VE is adolescents’ perceptions of their parents’ encouragement of their pursuit ofeducational and career goals. Each of the CRPSS scales is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 =Strongly Disagree, 3 = Neither Agree or Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree), with higher scoresindicating more agreement. Sample items are: “My parents teach me things that I will somedaybe able to use at my job” (IA), and “My parents have shown me where they work” (CM).Parent’s career-related role
by thinking critically. Our initial experience with PBL has shown usthat it is very challenging to satisfy criteria 3-6 of high quality PBL in typical classroom settings.This becomes even more challenging working with sophomore students who lack the essentialskills such as teamwork. Hence, we embedded the Agile Project Management (APM) into PBLto respond to students’ struggles with criteria 3-6 of PBL.Agile Project Management is an iterative approach to planning and guiding project processeswith ability to respond to issues as they arise [12-13]. APM methodology has received muchattention in the 21st century, particularly from software development companies. However, inthe recent years, owing to its numerous benefits, it has been modified to
theengineering building was in the middle of a $108 million renovation and expansion.]The STEP 1a grant to LSU ended in 2011, and most of the programs developed from this award,including the bridge camp, were institutionalized in the College of Engineering. This program iscurrently sustained through participant fees, as well as support from the college and industrydonors. There is a full-time staff member who oversees all aspects of camp planning andexecution, and who also serves as the advisor for the peer mentor student organization. Table I Number of E2 Participants and Mentors for Each Year of the Program Year ‘07 ‘08 ‘09 ‘10 ‘11 ‘12 ‘13 ‘14 ‘15 ‘16
could best benefit students.The process of adopting a shared vision started by holding lunch meetings where all facultybrainstormed how they envision "Engineering with Engineering." These brainstorming sessionsled to planning sessions surrounding curricular change discussed in the Curriculum sectionbelow. The “critical doing” of developing the new curriculum allowed the faculty to examine thecurrent system, identify issues to be addressed, and build the shared vision.Faculty reached the consensus on bringing industry practice to our students and sharing thevision of “Engineering with Engineers” during the first year of this project.b. Revised department mission. A department vision day was held for faculty to discuss andupdate the department
single session [8], rather than spacing out their learning. Hora and Oleson [9]found in a qualitative study that almost half of STEM students reported “cramming” for theirexams, meaning they began studying for an exam sometime from a few days before the exam tothe night before it.In terms of STEM-specific studying requirements, STEM as a discipline is distinct in many waysfrom other college majors. It involves scientific inquiry, problem-solving (often collaboratively),creativity, and a broad understanding of interdisciplinary concepts and how they relate to eachother [10]. In particular, math is known to be more cognitively challenging than many othertraditional academic subjects [11] and requires effective planning for success, not just
likely to enroll in online education programs havedifficulties effectively using the resources these programs provide.[17], [18] Second, materialscurrently hosted online are primarily beneficial to educators rather than students, since they couldbe difficult to navigate unless one knows what one is looking for (Fig. 1), and most materialsconsist in lesson plans, case studies, and videos for use in instructor-led courses (Fig. 2). Third,their use requires substantial preparation time and effort on the part of instructors (Fig. 3). Bycontrast, the web modules described here are all inclusive: They can be used anytime, anywhereby students, without preparation on the part of instructors.Fig. 1 Navigating resources at the OEC[14]Fig. 2 A lesson plan
science and engineering programs is not a new concept.According to the review done by Shuman, Besterfield-Sacre, and McGourty, there isencouraging evidence to suggest that the Accrediting Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) professional skills can be taught effectively [5]. Specifically, these authors highlight theimportance of incorporating real-world experiences into the engineering curriculum as the mosteffective way to integrate both professional and technical skill development into acomprehensive educational experience [5]. Though informative, students’ attitudes regardingthese methods are essential to understand as theory suggests attitudes are immediate precursorsto actual behaviors (i.e., theory of planned behavior) [6]. To date