relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques in undergraduate classes (problem based learning, games and simulations, etc.) as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the Chemical and Petroleum Engineering as well as broader engineering curriculum. In addition, she is actively engaged in the development of a variety of informal science education approaches with the goal of exciting and teaching K-12 students about regenerative medicine and its potential.Prof. Eric J Beckman, Chemical Engineering Department, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Beckman assumed his faculty position at the University of Pittsburgh in 1989, was promoted to as- sociate professor in 1994, and full professor in 1997
interesting research topics andindustrial applications so that students can make meaningful connections with the subject matter.Such integration requires an alignment between participants’ professional background, areas ofteaching, and the topic of their research. Strong alignment is the key to cultivating student interestin STEM and manufacturing. To meet these challenges, we have initiated the following changes in the 2019 program: 1.Recruit teachers whose area of teaching is directly related to engineering applications especiallyin the manufacturing sector; 2. Allow teachers to design a smaller curriculum unit so it is easier tofit in their teaching assignment; 3. Encourage teachers to inspire intrinsic motivation amongstudents to learn the
research is discipline-specific and focuses on identifying how self-efficacy relates to engineering design achievement in an undergraduate BME curriculum. Twogoals of our research include: 1) to increase self-efficacy of undergraduate BME students byproviding project-based learning experiences throughout the curriculum; and 2) to identify ifbiomedical engineering student self-efficacy differences correlate with student ability toeffectively translate fundamental knowledge toward engineering design.Since we bring disciplinary expertise, our choice of mentors parallels the engineering educationresearch topics required to successfully approach our study’s research goals. Again, we targetedthree areas for development: social science research in design
Forming this strategic roadmap has been an exercise in astute entrepreneurship. The Curriculum Research entrepreneurial challenge in developing this path is to think creatively, about how to prepare this program for the future. In particular a special emphasis will be placed Student Strategic Mentoring Alliances in its role as pipeline for the new Ph.D
permeating the future professionalpractice of engineering. Defining and achieving desired objectives in humanities education isformidable for undergraduate students in general. At one extreme, there are so-calledtraditionalists who hold the position that all “educated” individuals should demonstrate a masteryof specified topics (for example, Greek classics), with the topics more or less representing theentire history of western civilization. Examples of adherents of this position are Allen Bloomand Ed Hirsch, academics who have authored the controversial books The Closing of theAmerican Mind 1 and Cultural Literacy 2 respectively. Traditionalist curriculums tend to be veryhomogenous, with minimum flexibility regarding course selection. Taking an
. Course Description and ObjectivesWhile PLC’s remained as the major component, the course modification allowedinclusion of various technologies, connections and contrasts between them, and their past,current, and future roles in industrial controls area. The added content and their detailsare presented in Table 2. Since a few new components were introduced to the curriculum,main hands-on additions were limited to the hardwired ralay-logic and integrated-circuitbased controls areas. These components were critical in teaching PLC basics and logic to Page 11.455.2the students. Besides having hands-on laboratories, demos and review discussions werealso
Paper ID #43473Board 154: Broadening Participation and the Mission of Engineering forUS All: A Case Study of Engineering in a Classroom Serving Students withDisabilities (Work in Progress)Dr. Jennifer Lee Kouo, The Johns Hopkins University Dr. Jennifer Kouo is an Assistant Research Scientist at the Center for Technology in Education (CTE) at the Johns Hopkins University School of Education. Jennifer’s areas of expertise include Universal Design for Learning, technology integration, assistive technologies, and serving students with a range of disabilities, particularly autism spectrum disorder. She is currently engaged in
, administrators andtechnology facilitators [8]. The evolving technology is also creating other challenges for theteachers as they struggle to keep up with the speed of technology change. Professors today needto separate themselves from the past and accept technology as an integral part of the education ofstudents in the 21st century – so these students are capable to compete on the global level. Withthe ubiquitous computing resources exploding and availability of ideas, faculty members mustembrace the accessibility of information on the World Wide Web. Professors need to becomemore responsive to the resources available on the internet and its use in the classroom. They needto determine ways to connect the online and offline digital media to curriculum
Page 7.32.9 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationinclude the preservation of consistency between component interfaces as well as correctbehavior. System-level integration and test is an enormous task since it evolves the entire system,external interfaces and the environment. To address these issues in the curriculum, we will placean emphasis on the following two approaches: incremental integration with progressive andsystemic testing, and white-box testing of temporal properties.Various integration strategies have been investigated since 1970’s with the most effectivetechnique being incremental integration, either bottom-up or top-down approaches. To performincremental integration and progressive test at
academic year by 32teachers. These units are embedded in courses that cover mathematics, science, engineering,English, and social studies content. The results from the content pre- and post-assessments willanswer the research question: How do students conceptualize microelectronics and its meaningfor engineering and society after completing an integrated STEM unit embedded withmicroelectronics contexts?A measurement of change in student understanding is collected through identical pre- and post-assessments given at the start and conclusion of each curriculum unit. These content assessmentscontain the four prompts: 1) What does the term “microelectronics” mean?, 2) How aremicroelectronics used in field?, with “field” being the subject of the class
loading isoften used in the Aerospace industry, with the grade of complexity depending on the number ofdiscrete loading points on the structure and the number of levels in the WLM. Regardless of itsloading complexity, such experiments embody many of the basic principles covered in staticsand mechanics of materials courses such as the calculation of the magnitude and location of theresultant force associated with a distributed load. This experience provided the impetus for theauthors to pursue the topic presented in this paper.After an initial brainstorming, authors submitted a proposal and received a grant to pursue a planto integrate hands-on activities into the mechanics of materials curriculum. A simple beamtesting system (BTS) was
desired program outcomes will also be outlined.2.0 Curriculum OverviewFigure 1 presents an overview of the new architectural engineering program. Highlights of thisprogram include the following: 1) the students alternate between academic and coop work terms,with the exception of having two back-to-back academic terms in their fourth year; 2) each termfeatures a studio course – as mentioned earlier, each of these courses will involve the planningand execution of a series of design projects that integrate and put into practice concepts coveredin the other courses the students will be taking; 3) the core courses in the first two years are builton the established civil, environmental, and geological engineering programs at the sameinstitution, and
partner university. An important side benefit in this age of dwindlingeducational resources is that students will have access to the full array of specialized electivetopics, laboratory equipment and practical experiences available at any partner university.From a practical perspective, the Global Engineering College (GEC) model consists of four keyelements that interact in complementary fashion to provide a wide range of internationalexperience and training opportunities: Curriculum Internationalization. International perspectives can be integrated into existing engineering course curricula by replacing generic, context-free assignments and projects with “scenario-based” challenges, in which the same pedagogic exercises are situated
teaching STEM curriculum. This begged the question,how can we assess the influence of a short term intervention (three-day SySTEMic Solutionworkshop) on the participating teachers’ perceptions, understanding, and willingness to teachSTEM?Variables Contributing to Teacher EffectivenessTo address this question we conducted a search of the literature to determine what factors havebeen found to be related to elementary teachers’ effectiveness in teaching STEM content. Oursearch revealed a report by Parker and Heywood17 espousing a relationship between the increasein understanding of science content and an increased knowledge of how to teach science. Thissuggests that an assessment of changes in STEM knowledge may be an effective indicator ofteacher
how people learn,and strategies for integrating STEM throughout the curriculum. In addition, the participantsreceived STEM curriculum in materials science and a resource kit composed of STEMmaterials and equipment, valued at about $300, to support the implementation of curriculumand content learned at the institute with their students.The i-STEM summer institute participants were pre/post tested on their comfort with STEM,perceptions of STEM education, pedagogical discontentment, implementations of inquiry, Page 22.1019.2attitudes toward student learning of STEM, and content knowledge associated with the specificcourse they took during the
years, MEMS research has supported thedevelopment of technologies such as switches, displays, pressure sensors, accelerometers,gyroscopes, inkjet printer heads, and lab-on-a-chip chemical detection systems. Discoveriessuch as these have not only inspired the industrial world, but have given rise to interest amongacademic institutions in incorporating MEMS into their curriculum 2,3 . MEMS research has an Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Regional Conference 381interdisciplinary nature originating from the need to design and integrate electrical, mechanical,optical, and
watching the video, lectures or reading the text, students have the chance tocontrol the pace of multimedia streaming to match their own learning preferences. Students canalso watch or listen to recordings of class lectures on their computers, tablets, smart phones, orpersonal media players outside of class, leaving class time to engage in learning activities thatmight otherwise be assigned as homework [4]. Teaching is a complicated practice that requires expertise in many kinds of specializedknowledge. As an ill-structured discipline, teaching requires application of complex knowledgestructures across different cases and contexts that requires constant evolution. Effective teachingdepends on access to rich, well-organized and integrated
both classrooms, the instructor space includes a “Sympodium” interactive digital pendisplay, linked to dual projectors. White boards are available for instructor and student use. Aschematic and photo of the larger classroom are shown in Figure 1.An integrated statics and dynamics course, a required course for all Mechanical Engineeringmajors, was offered for the first time in Fall 2006. This replaced the traditional pair of 3-creditcourses, Statics and Dynamics in the ME curriculum, although the traditional courses are still Page 12.176.3offered for other majors. The course is a 5 credit-hour course and met 5 days a week. Threemeetings were
disorders, workplace layout, safety and health.The Industrial Engineering student typically takes at least one introductory course in ergonomicsas part of their undergraduate curriculum. Thus, work integrated learning is a natural fit due tothe presence of workplace features and discussions that necessarily happen in this type of class.Innovation is necessary as new workplaces and equipment are brought into the workplace withincreasing speed and complexity. Biomimicry seemed like an interesting application forphysical ergonomics problems since nature faces and adapts to numerous environmentalconditions and potential hazards.Bringing it All TogetherThese four fragmented topics – PBL, Innovation, Biomimicry and Ergonomics – are broughttogether in the
Intelligence (AI) in education and STEM education research.John O Ajamobe, Texas A&M University John Ajamobe is a doctoral student in the Department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture at Texas A&M University. He was a former high school educator and has an interdisciplinary background in economics and educational leadership. His research focuses on improving educational systems through advocacy for school safety, economics of education, and school accountability.Segun Timothy AjoseMr. Peter Oluwaseyi Oyewole, Kent State University, Kent Peter Oyewole is a doctoral candidate and teaching instructor at the School of Teaching Learning and Curriculum, Kent State University.Grace Iyinoluwa Olaitan
windows of the classroom and collecting additional data to see the impact.Summer Workshops An integral part of the ITEST project is to involve 4th through 12th grade educators inthe process and have them create and deploy relevant curriculum in their classrooms in order tohave direct impact on young students. To support this goal, the team will run summerworkshops where 4th through 12th grade educators from regional schools will be identified andthen trained in the relevant technologies. These workshops will last two weeks where the firstweek will be “teaching the teachers” and the second week will be devoted to assisting theteachers in developing appropriate curriculum that integrates the technologies discussed aboveinto their classroom
students for an engineeringeducation. The new curriculum was implemented in Fall 2000.EGR 1303 –Exploring the Engineering ProfessionA brief review of previously reported attempts to develop successful programs to attract andretain students in the engineering field shows that a primary objective must involve improvingthe curriculum. The new curriculum should be the primary tool to recruit new students andretain those enrolled beyond their first academic year. One of the studies provided clearindications that freshman and sophomore classes are critical in retaining students in the field ofengineering.[4] Early hands-on projects which involve active learning and student participationappear to be very promising. Many engineering schools introduced
educational impact, WPI conducted a mixed-methods study of 38 years of alumni of thePBL-based curriculum [7]. Alumni attributed a wide range of professional skills and abilities as well asaspects of personal growth and broader world views to their formal project experiences. Interestingly,women reported more strongly positive impacts than men in 36 of 39 growth areas, suggesting that PBLcould be an effective means for attracting and retaining women in engineering programs [8]. With regard to support of faculty development, all faculty are expected to engage in some form of PBL.WPI has featured a PBL-based curriculum for nearly 50 years, so the current faculty composition mayreflect self-selection for comfort with project learning. It is notable
environmental andsocial performance together with economic viability. The challenge is to reduce this powerfulabstract concept into a rigorous educational framework, with clear-cut methods, tools, and metrics,so it can be integrated into engineering curricula and practiced by professionals. The UnitedNations defines sustainability in terms of development that meets the needs of the present withoutcompromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. This requires a mutuallyoptimal usage of natural, societal, and economic resources. Sustainability education necessitatesthe use of unconventional approaches as against the traditional lecture-based style. Someinstitutions have tried to develop a sustainability curriculum using the
highlyunlikely that conventional nuclear engineering programs can provide a flow of graduatesadequate to meet the near-term needs of industry and the federal government.As an alternative, we have explored the development of a national curriculum in nuclear fissionpower engineering that would serve as a certificate-based, minor concentration for undergraduatestudents majoring in traditional engineering degree programs such as mechanical, electrical,chemical, and computer engineering. The proposed program would augment conventionalundergraduate engineering degree programs with a four-course sequence offered in the juniorand senior years, accompanied by a summer practicum involving extensive laboratory experienceat a regional university reactor facility, a
programentitled Course, Curriculum and Laboratories Improvement (CCLI-EMD). Thetitle of the grant is “PROJECT EMD-MLR: Educational Materials Developmentthrough the Integration of Machine Learning Research into Senior DesignProjects”. The project partners are two major universities in Central Florida,Florida Institute of Technology (FIT) in Melbourne and the University of CentralFlorida (UCF) in Orlando. In addition to the two universities, there are two 2-yearCentral Florida colleges, Seminole Community College (SCC) in Oviedo andBrevard Community College (BCC) in Palm Bay.Project EMD-MLR is a “proof-of-concept” project focused on Machine Learning(ML), whose immediate objectives are i) the development of educational materialin the form of software
curriculum to incorporate opportunities for students to exercise theirentrepreneurial mindset. The Kern Family Foundation has established a network of institutionsthat are committed to changing their pedagogy to develop entrepreneurial mindset inundergraduate engineers, known as KEEN (Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network). KEENhas established an entrepreneurial mindset framework that involves the three C’s: curiosity:“students will demonstrate constant curiosity about our changing world and explore a contrarianview of accepted solutions”, connections: “students will integrate information from manysources to gain insight and access and manage risk” and creating value: “students will identifyunexpected opportunities to create extraordinary value
finished; • meaningful integration of engineering and communication expertise in course and curriculum design; • recognizing engineering communication as both a distinctive field of expertise and an interdisciplinary enterprise; and • designing curricula, not just courses, because communication ability develops over time through practiceIn addition to these guiding principles, the publications from the LEES and technicalcommunication communities articulate a robust model of integration that would exclude suchpractices as confusing instruction in leadership or management with instruction incommunication; thinking that anyone who can recognize good writing can teach writing;assuming that writing
collaboration, 3D data interoperability, and engineering design graphics standards and documentation. Nathan has taught graduate courses in the foundations of graphics in technology and instrumentation and measurement in research design. He has worked for a variety of companies in using and integrating PLM tools in the engineering design process through the development of custom training applications and materials. Nathan holds a Bachelor of Science in Technical Graphics and a Master of Science in Technology from Purdue University, and a doctorate in Technology Education from North Carolina State University.Mitchell L Springer, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Mitchell L. Springer, PMP, SPHR Dr. Springer is an
-Implement-Operate (CDIO), while making the key success-enabling principle ofthe Minority Engineering Program model--collaborative learning--an explicit and integrated partengineering curriculum design. The approach involves establishing a model framework foradapting and implementing CDIO so that it: can be generalized for and have programmaticimpact at other predominantly minority institutions similar to CSUN; can contribute to anevolving community of interaction, development and ongoing improvements in the education ofminority engineering students; and can significantly increase the number of minority studentsable to Conceive-Design-Implement-Operate new products and systems. The framework consistsof two components: adaptation and implementation