. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación En Matemática Educativa, 12(3), 355– 382. 5. Noss, R., Hoyles, C., Mavrikis, M., Geraniou, E., Gutierrez-Santos, S., & Pearce, D. (2009). Broadening the sense of “dynamic”: A microworld to support students’ mathematical generalisation. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(4), 493–503. doi:10.1007/s11858-009-0182-8 6. Salinas, P., Quintero, E., & González-Mendívil, E. (2014). An environment to promote a visual learning of Calculus. In H. R. Arabnia, A. Bahrami, L. Deligiannidis, & G. Jandieri (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Engineering (pp. 425–429). Las
initialscholarship recipients left the program to pursue non-STEM majors where theycould help others and four left for that they perceived to be less time consumingundergraduate programs so that they could spend more time working or on socialactivities.In this program, NSF S-STEM scholarships were awarded to 15 students. Therequirements for students to maintain their NSF scholarship were continuousenrollment in courses leading toward a STEM degree, 3.0 GPA, and activeparticipation in the one-credit course associated with the scholarship eachsemester. The course was used to enable more one-on-one interactions betweenstudents and faculty as well as with their teammates from different disciplines.Interacting with faculty, whether in the classroom, the
tRAT is keyto help students to correct misconceptions in real time, and the points-scale gives the studentsmotivation to learn to work together effectively as a team without instructor input. After allteams have completed the tRAT, the instructor can give a short—typically 5 to 10 minutes—lecture clearing up any remaining confusion about the topic. Students are given an opportunity tosubmit a written appeal, as a team, of any RAT question they believe might be ambiguous. Anexample of a RAT is given in the appendix.The applications–on which the most time is spent in class–are problems that the students mustsolve as a team. The applications follow a 4-S format: Same problem, Significant problem,Specific choice, and Simultaneous report. A class
/Accreditation_Documents/Current/eac-criteria-2012–2013.pdf[4] Zimmerman, Donald E., and Michael Palmquist. 1993. "Enhancing Electrical EngineeringStudents' Communication Skills." In Proceedings of the IEEE International ProfessionalCommunication Conference, Philadelphia, October 5-8: 428-31.[5] Fisher, E., Usrey, M. W., & Beaslq, H. A. (2003). OWL: A wise way to enhance engineering students’ writingskills. ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, November 5-November 8.[6] Rohrbach, S. ; Ishizaki, S. ; Werner, N. ; Miller, J. ; Dzombak, D. (2013). Improving students' professionalcommunication skills through an integrated learning system. Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 2013IEEE International[7] Werner, N. ; Ishizaki, S. ; Rohrbach, S
STEM outreach with a full engineering design, build, and test cycle. GlobalJournal of Engineering Education. 2012;14(3):225-232.15. Brown JS, Collins A, Newman S. Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading,writing, and mathematics. In: Resnick L, ed. Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays inhonor of robert glaser. Vol 487. Psychology of Education and Instruction Series ed. LawrenceErlbaum; 1989.16. Tillman D, Kjellstrom W, Smith S, Yoder E. Digital fabrication scaffolds for developingpreservice elementary teachers’ mathematics pedagogy. Society for Information Technology &Teacher Education International Conference. 2011;2011(1):892-897.17. Tillman D, Ducamp G, Dejaegher C, Cohen J, Kjellstrom W, Smith S. A role for
andlearning center. There are two ways to approach this overlap. The first is to make the ASEEprogramming unique. On large campuses, some Chapters have found success in providingSTEM-specific content as a supplement to the campus-level content for all majors. The secondapproach is to partner with other organization(s). This approach has extra benefits; it exposesASEE and its mission to the members of other organizations and it can provide extra assistancefor planning and execution. For research-specific programming, some campuses have foundsuccess with ASEE-hosted STEM education poster sessions. While almost 90% of therespondents reported having some campus-level teaching programming, at least 65% reportedthat they are interested in ASEE providing
toolsthat are being developed to achieve project objectives, the work related to the development ofcase studies is described here. Historically, case studies have been as educational tools inbusiness, law and medicine but not so much in software engineering. The hypothesis is that casestudies would be effective educational tools to introduce real-world professional practices intothe classroom which would help the students in identifying and solving problems, and develop aperspective on knowledge application. In this paper we describe a set of V&V related case-studies that we have drawn from industry experiences and developed them as pedagogical tools.These case-studies cover several important topics in S/W V&V domain such as software
, Disciplines in which used, Type(s) of institutions in which used, Capstone course duration, Nature of capstone General projects connected with resource, Timing of resource usage in capstone, First (for all Resources) year that the resource was used in capstone, Notes/observations/constraints/advice Category(s) of outcomes assessed, Types of student responses required, Rubrics for scoring, Number of students typically assessed at one time with the resource, Assessment Specific Instrument testing, Scoring consistency by multiple raters, Validity or accuracy in measuring what
attributesof the students entering the LLC and experiences within the LLC during the first semester. Theimpact of the LLC appears to be retained, via personal connections gained through studentinteractions within an engineering/computer-science focused dorm, through the remainder of theundergraduate years.Introduction Page 26.345.2Living-Learning Communities (LLCs) have been studied by a number of authors under a numberof conditions since at least the early 1990’s.1,2,3 As documented by multiple authors, a widerange of LLCs exist,3,4,5 including both LLCs focused on specific disciplines and residentiallybased LLCs. Within the realm of LLCs, a wide
use constructs of affect to i This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. NSF 14-32426,14-31717, and 14-31609. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the materialsprovided are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. understand and assess the students’ STEM affect. Each component of the theoretical frameworkis described in the following paragraphs.STEM-literacy for the 21st Century is multifaceted and includes content knowledge and habits ofmind5. For the purpose of this study, we refer to
facultyclassroom practice (RTOP Z-score). This study also found that faculty classroom practice isrelated to student outcomes and that student-centered teaching practices are related to bettergrades and less course withdrawals. In other words shifting faculty practices towards student-centeredness would likely lead to lower percentages of DEW student grades. Providing effectivefaculty development opportunities in student-centered instruction is therefore highlyrecommended in order to mend the gap between faculty beliefs and practice and to promote morepositive student outcomes.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1226586.Bibliography1 M. L. Blanton, S. Westbrook and G. Carter, "Using
Engineeringstudents. In the future, we will make more effort on generating interdisciplinary projects bystudents and faculty from different disciplines.AcknowledgmentThe project activities were funded by the Sacramento State University Enterprises, Inc. (UEI)Campus Grant Program. The authors are grateful to Sacramento State University College ofEngineering for their support on providing the space and the facility for pursuing our projects.References1. Kuribayashi, K., 1989, “Millimeter Size Joint Actuator using Shape Memory Alloy,” Proc. IEEE An Investigation of Micro Structures, Sensors, Actuators, Machines and Robots, Salt Lake City, UT, pp. 139 – 144.2. Tanner, J., Grames, C., Jensen B. D., Magleby, S. P., and Howell, L. L., 2015, “Millimeter
on Homework Submissions. Error bars represent plus and minus one standard deviation.To determine whether homework assignment performance is related to exam performance, amultiple linear regression is conducted to predict exam score as a function of performance on thefive components of the homework rubric: solution, personalization, integration, thoughtfulpuzzle, and communication (style, usage, and layout). The form of the regression equation isgiven by Equation 1, [1]where E, S, P, I, T, and C are the student’s average exam, (homework) solution, personalization,integration, thoughtful puzzle, and communication scores
., & Rogers, C. (2010). The benefits of model building in teaching engineering design. Design Studies, 31(3), 288-309. 3. Steif, P. S., & Dantzler, J. A. (2005). A Statics Concept Inventory: Development and Psychometric Analysis. Journal Of Engineering Education, 94(4), 363-371. 4. Steif, P. S., & Hansen, M. A. (2006). Comparisons between performances in a statics concept inventory and course examinations. International Journal Of Engineering Education, 22, 1070-1076. 5. Steif, P. S., & Hansen, M. A. (2007). New practices for administering and anlyzing the results of concept inventories. Journal Of Engineering Education, 96(3), 205-212. 6. Dollár, A., & Steif, P. S. (2006). Learning
. The actions that a student takes ina learning cycle are not normally provided for assessment in a traditional setting, but theprocedures explained here allows those actions to be recorded.References1. Butler, D. L., and Winne, P. H. (1995) Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis, Review of Educational Research 65, 245-281.2. Shute, V. J. (2008) Focus on Formative Feedback, Review of Educational Research 78, 153-189.3. Nicol, D. J., and Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice, Studies in higher education 31, 199-218.4. Thurlings, M., Vermeulen, M., Bastiaens, T., and Stijnen, S. (2013) Understanding
additional weekfor completion, the project can be expanded to include more variables: additional trussgeometries, which inclueds member orientation, length, and thickness. In addition, an instructorcan require each individual group to 3D print their own truss (rather than simply demonstratingthe printing procedure and conducting the failure loading test of the two optimized trusses). Thistype of expansion, of course, will require a significant time investment. It typically takes onehour to print the members needed to fully erect the truss at normal printing speeds (60-80 mm/s).The time required to train the teaching assistant (TA) to install and troubleshoot the 3D printer,and work with the g-code generator should take approximately 5-10 hours
. (2004). Learning to Solve Problems: An Instructional Design Guide. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.5. Jonassen, D.H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63-856. Benson, L. C. S.J. Grigg, and D. R. Bowman. (2011). CU Thinking: Problem-Solving Strategies Revealed. Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference, Vancouver, Canada.7. .Burtner, J. (2005). The Use of Discriminant Analysis to Investigate the Influence of Non-Cognitive Factors on Engineering School Persistence. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(3): 335−338.8. Honken, N., & Ralston, P. A. S. (2013). Freshman engineering retention: A holistic look. Journal of STEM
schools. She co-leads the ”ADVANCE Hispanic Women in STEM” project in Puerto Rico, and the Latin and Caribbean Consor- tium of Engineering Institutions’ (LACCEI) ”Women in STEM” forum. Tull was a finalist for the 2015 Global Engineering Deans Council/Airbus Diversity Award, and has presented on diversity in the US, Latin America, Europe, Australia, India. She is a Tau Beta Pi ”Eminent Engineer.”Dr. David A. Delaine, Universidade de S˜ao Paulo David A. Delaine is a progressive engineer who has strong interests in the intersections of engineering, education, and society. He has obtained a Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Drexel University, in Philadelphia, USA. He is currently serving his second term as an executive
October 1, 2013, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel- final_2-25-12.pdf.10. Bennett, J. (2005). The effects of context-based and Science-Technology-Society (STS) approaches in the teaching of secondary science on boys and girls, and on lower-ability pupils. Retrieved August 23, 2013, from http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=SqD-s- 48RCY%3d&tabid=329&mid=1242.11. Hulleman, C. S., and Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Making Education Relevant: Increasing Interest and Performance in High School Science Classes. Science, 326, 1410-1412.12. Bennett, J., and Holman, J. (2002). Context-Based Approaches to the Teaching of Chemistry: What are They and
,University of Dayton and Shanghai Normal University have been developing and operating a3 + 1 joint degree program since 2006 [10]. The first three years of the program are taughtand managed by the university in China, then students transfer to the university in the U.S. toget an undergraduate degree in engineering. On the other hand, Worcester PolytechnicInstitute sends their students to a university in China during a summer for global project [11].As shown in the table, there are variety of programs in terms of types, characteristics andparticipants of the programs. Table 1. Survey of Global Academic Program between the U.S. and ChinaUniversity in US University in China Type of Major(s) Year Remarks
finished their projects (see figures 2a and 2b). Participants were asked to reflect back tobefore the project began to rate their confidence on skills on a Likert scale, and then considertheir confidence at the conclusion of the project. In the future, a survey will be given to studentsat the first build session, and the same survey upon completion to measure competencies.A statistical analysis of the survey results was performed. For each category considered, the datawas first tested for normality. For normally distributed data sets, a paired t-test was used. For thedata that was not normal, the Wilcoxon R-S test was used to test for significance. A p-value lessthan 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Figure 2a: First part of survey
is collected, quick measurements of the bell(s) should be made so that a model can bebuilt in Solidworks. This model will be used in Abaqus to determine a numerical value for theresonant frequency, and the quantity subsequently used for comparisons with experimental data. 1. Program the MATLAB FFT analysis script. 2. Strike the two bells, and run the program to record the sound and analyze the audio input. 3. Use Solidworks to model the bells separately, export the part files to Abaqus. 4. Apply Abaqus to calculate the vibration in resonance step. 5. Compare the results from the FFT and simulation strategies in each group. Determine what errors are present in the experiment and how to eliminate them. The process for the
. ReferenceLoyalka, P., Carnoy, M., Froumin, I., Dossani, R., Tilak, J. B., & Yang, P. (2014). Factors affecting the quality of engineering education in the four largest emerging economies. Higher Education, 68(6), 977-1004Lubinski, D. (2010). Spatial ability and STEM: A sleeping giant for talent identification and development. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(4), 344-351.Maeda, Y. & Yoon, S. (2011). Scaling the Revised PSVT-R: Characteristics of the First-Year Engineering Students' Spatial Ability. Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Vancouver, BC, 2011.Maeda, Y., & Yoon, S. Y. (2013). A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured by the
withsignificantly more participants would allow the validation of the assessment tools used. Thiswould better help fill the gap in the literature of quantitative data supporting the use of EML, asdiscussed in Section 1.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the Kern Entrepreneurial EngineeringNetwork (KEEN) for funding which partially supported this work.References[1] Svihla, V., and Reeve, R., 2016. “Facilitating Problem Framing in Project-Based Learning”.Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(2).[2] Mikesell, D. R., and Yoder, J.-D. S., 2011. “Teaching dynamics with a design project.” ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition.[3] Bigelow, K., 2016. “Creating Assignments that Excite and Empower Students: The
S-STEM grant to recruit rural stu- dents from Iowa and Illinois into STEM. Dr. Prosise mentors the collegiate chapter of SWE and organizes many outreach events encourage girls to go into STEM. She leads a study-abroad trip for engineering students to Brazil every-other-year, where students design, build, and implement assistive technologies for people with disabilities. Her research focus is to develop affordable upper limb prosthetics.Dr. R R Romatoski, Saint Ambrose UniversityDr. Susa H Stonedahl, St. Ambrose University Susa Hardwick Stonedahl is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering and Physics at St. Ambrose University. She received her BA in Mathematics and Physics from Carleton College and her
document any conflict of interest.Forming a CompanyThere are several types of companies (LLC, C-Corp, S-Corp, etc.) and your SBDC probably hasresources to help explain the differences. An LLC is quick and easy to form either through yourSBDC, online via sites like LegalZoom.com, or through a startup-friendly lawyer, and can beconverted to a C-Corp later. However, if you plan to take on venture capital early, you may wantto start with a C-Corp. Some incubator and accelerator programs facilitate this process, and otheruseful startup sites have templates to help with the paperwork [12].If you are a solo founder at this point, the paperwork is straightforward. However, if you haveco-founders, you will likely want to set up an operating agreement early
and basicmanufacturing processes. Industrial experience in the form of internship(s) is alsodesirable to appreciate the factors affecting the fuel economy.Literature and proposed topics of coverageCurrently, to the knowledge of the author, there seems to be no single textbook under thetitle or keywords on “Automotive Lightweighting Technologies” that is targeted forundergraduate and master students. However, material related to some or all topicscovered in the proposed course are available in different textbooks, short courses and inmany research papers. For example, Case Western University offers certificate program(LIFT Curriculum) that covers topics on lightweighting using polymers, additivemanufacturing and metals [2]. University of
narrow theirscope as they traverse the design challenge. Future research should investigate this approachacross different design challenges, using a larger subset of students, and incorporatequantitative and explanatory data analysis.6. References[1] L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, Teaching the entrepreneurial mindset to engineers. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2018.[2] J. Seddon and S. Caulkin, "Systems thinking, lean production and action learning," Action Learning: Research and Practice, vol. 4, pp. 9-24, 2007.[3] T. Brown, Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation New York, NY: Harper Collins, 2009.[4] A. Osterwalder, Y. Pigneur, G
: Morgan James Publishing, 2017. 8. K. Stave and M. Hopper, “What Constitutes Systems Thinking: A Proposed Taxonomy.” 25th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Jul. 1, 2007. https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/sea_fac_articles/201. 9. J. Froyd, L. Pchenitchnaia, D. Fowler, and N. Simpson, Systems Thinking and Integrative Learning Outcomes paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. 10. D.V. Behl, and S. Ferreira, “Systems Thinking: An Analysis of Key Factors and Relationships.” Procedia Computer Science, Complex Adaptive Systems, Philadelphia, PA Nov. 3-5, 2014, vol. 36, pp. 104–9, Jan 1, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.09.045. 11. F
university. The collected data also helped determine what practices could beimproved. Although the study was done on a specific makerspace, the setup and operation of thefacility are well-defined, and may potentially aid other colleges and universities in creating andmaintaining their own makerspaces.References[1] U. S. National Academy of Engineering, "The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century," National Academies Press, Washington, D. C., 2004.[2] M. Itani and I. Srour, "Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Soft Skills," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 142, no. 1, p. 04015005, 2015.[3] U. S. Department of Commerce, "The Innovative and Entrepreneurial University: Higher