courses.Yes, this is a description of an efficient knowledging bureaucratic system. Departments mustadapt to knowledge teaching if baccalaureate engineers are to survive in the knowledge age andnot be largely replaced by information handling computers. The knowledging process must beefficient for current society cannot afford an elaborate inefficient use of limited monetary re-sources. The process must be responsible to survive as a viable and pragmatic bureaucratic or-ganization.In this era of knowledging, the preeminent person to be named dean of engineering is aleader/administrator that has performed in the best, responsible manner for a number of years. Itis not the academic vice president’s selection of a “hot” research person as dean
’ exposure and obtain a real-world experience in a STEM laboratory, Dr.Berrett’s and Mr. Frazier’s concept was put into play. They sent their best and brightest nativestudents to the Logan campus to work with STEM faculty performing researching the summer.They proposed the basic following structure: • 16-20 students for four weeks – students working in pairs. • Rotation through 8-12 laboratories or lab experiences. • Students stay on campus housing. • Hire graduate student facilitators from the Logan Campus to coordinate efforts.Anticipated Outcomes: By allowing participating students to get beyond their introductory levelcourses and be mentored and trained in a short intensive experience, it was believed that theywould find
enough? At West Point, that answer is a resounding no! Everyone canimprove their performance with proper training, but especially anyone doing somethingfor the first time – like new teachers! Every department at West Point has some form ofinstructor summer training for their new faculty. The training programs range from two tosix weeks with all programs having some type of practice teaching sessions. Even withthe formal training programs, United States Military Academy (USMA) new faculty areexpected to continue to learn a lot about the basics of leading classroom instructionthroughout their first and second semesters of teaching. However, the faculty traininggives our new instructors a theoretical foundation, and tangible examples as well as in
American Society for Engineering Education Midwest Section ConferenceThe literature also makes it clear that students are not in a position to evaluate certain elementsof faculty teaching performance. These general areas have been determined to include: Course design: its goals, content, and organization Methods and materials used in delivery Evaluation of student work (including grading practices)12Hoyt and Pallett note that these categories include such aspects as the comprehensiveness orrealism of course objectives, the degree to which course material presents a representative orbiased view of the subject matter, the degree to which readings or other assignments are balancedand appropriate, currency of the content, and the
ownership of their own learning. The discovery approach used by the author tries to buildon these principles to establish an innovative instructional design by marrying content withpresentation style in theory as well as in practice. Utilizing real-world problems as a stimulus forstudent learning is not at all new and has been in practice for a very long time. Educators haveunderstood that scholars have defined problem-based learning as minds-on, hands-on, focused,experiential learning. Instructors have also been encouraged to act as cognitive coaches who cannurture an environment that can support open inquiry. The author was inspired by the uniqueideas presented by these scholars and researchers. He has tried to build on such intelligent ideasto
“Energy and Environmental Issues for China.”Each student was assigned to study selected sites in depth and present his or her findings to thegroup on the day of the visit. In addition, students were expected to keep a journal documentingtheir reflections on what they had witnessed and learned throughout the trip. After the study-tour, the GTI Study Program participants made presentations to 200+ students in the College ofEngineering about the information they had learned and the impact of globalization oneveryone’s lives.2.4. Study Program Site SelectionAs mentioned earlier, all participants were undergraduate students; most of them were juniorsand seniors. It was discovered that stimulating student interest was best achieved by selectingstudy
for universities with first year engineering programswhich have lectures for hundreds students at the same time and very high student per professorratio. One example of such a course can be Mechanics (Mora, Sancho-Bru, Iserte, & Sánchez,2012). ePortfolios could be designed to help assess formative, continuous, and transfer of learningin courses with a large number of students, as well as for assessing graduate engineering programs(Kajfez et al., 2013), or supervision of final engineering projects (Filella et al., 2012). Furthermore, ePortfolios can document experiential learning and research-based learningthrough online engineering labs through cloud-based personal learning environments (Terkowsky,May, Haertel, & Pleul, 2013
Dr. Mudasser Wyne, National University Dr. Lu Zheng, National University Keynote SpeakersDr. Don CzechowiczB.S. University of Southern CaliforniaM.S./Ph.D. Penn State UniversityDr. Czechowicz is currently Project Leader at General Atomics where he has worked for the last25 years on a variety of applied technology programs mainly focused on advanced energydevelopment. Previously Dr. Czechowicz was at Los Alamos National Laboratory where he didhis Ph.D. thesis research, and was involved in nuclear power programs for space applications.For the past 15 years Don has served as advisor to the UCSD Engineering Honor Society, TauBeta Pi. In this role Don has been a link between the best
career motivators for girls and the messages that girls hear about Page 15.1024.3engineering. One of the most important motivators that help girls determine what field to go intois the ability to make a difference, yet their understanding of engineering comes from themessages they hear that engineering is challenging, difficult but rewarding, and uses math andscience to solve problems.5 If this perception can be changed through exposure to theengineering fields that best exemplify this ability to make a difference and impact lives, femalesmay be more likely to go into engineering.This paper discusses a service-learning outreach assignment
as ERP). During her studies in the United States she worked a research assistant at the Center for Innovation on Healthcare Logistics CIHL, her work for CIHL focused on assessing the impact of GS1 standards adoption in the healthcare supply chain. Her research interests are related to the modeling of technology adoption and in particular HIT. She also works in the adaptation of existing manufacturing and logistics models and structures to the healthcare supply chain with a specific focus on medical supplies. She is part of the IE Department at Universidad Icesi since 1998. She has over ten years experience as a teacher and served as Director of the Undergraduate Program in Industrial Engineering (2003-2007
as many of the 2015-2016 ECS Faculty Development Seminars as possible • Attend the ECS Faculty Half-day Teaching Workshop on December 8, 2015 • Attend a luncheon on December 8, 2015, with past KEEN Innovators to discuss lessons learned/best practices • Design an implementation plan to design, develop, and deploy the module(s) produced in the award timeframe • Assess the initial results of the module(s) • Make the module and all related teaching materials available for use throughout the KEEN network • Results of implementation and assessment will be published in a discipline-appropriate venue in the 2016-2017academic year. One faculty member has already published his results in the spring 2016
. The students depend on thisguide heavily to get ideas about the algorithm and to check the computational thinking and allows for further inquiry of thesyntax of the commands. In addition to the reference guide, a physics content through simulations and graphical analysis.few short examples are given to demonstrate the functionality There is a currently a proposal to implement more formaland syntax of new commands. The students often refer back to formative and summative assessments and cognitivethese examples when trying to incorporate the new commands measurement practices starting in the 2014-2015 school year tointo program. The new commands are added to the reference determine the impact of programming
industries are also recognizing that sustainable design leads to better,more economical, longer lasting facilities that are people-friendly. Inevitably, much of majorconstruction in the coming decades will feature sustainable design and construction processes.Sustainability must become a fundamental consideration in all civil engineering design andconstruction. As the leaders of change in fundamental civil engineering processes, it is theresponsibility of civil engineering departments nationwide to lead the movement towardsustainable civil engineering development through research and education of their students. TheASCE code of ethics suggests that failure to do so is a breach of civil engineering educationethics. In addition, to make sustainability
meaning but cannot fully relate to problem.Page 13.316.14 Goal 2, Objective 5, Outcome A: The Chemical Engineering Program at Rowan University will produce graduates who have the ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice (ABET - K). Students will apply fundamental principles of chemical engineering to solve engineering problems. . 4 3 2 1 1. Synthesizes and Can easily convert word Forms workable Has difficulty
. As illustrated in Figure 1, the focus ofthis problem-based activity is to promote students’ learning in the core concepts related toHyper-Text Transfer Protocol Secure, or HTTP over SSL. The learning objectives for thisparticular activity are: (a) review firewall, network design and web server configurationprocesses; (b) identify differences between HTTPS and HTTP; (c) migrate a website from HTTPto HTTPS; (d) acquire, activate and install certificates; (e) identify potential vulnerabilitiesrelated to data security; (f) define best practices related to HTTPS implementation; and (g)delineate optimal encryption method. Figure 1 presents the MEA.Once the learning objectives were identified, the next step in the process was to apply the
in addition to taking full course loads. Although they offered a first-year seminar,ETCS was experiencing retention rates to graduation of less than 50%, with the majority ofstudents leaving by the end of the second year. To improve retention rates, college facultymodified the existing Introduction to Engineering course, which previously followed thehistorical format of a seminar series about engineering professions. The new high-tech formatallows for student development of computer and personal skills necessary to succeed inengineering curriculums. The main focus of the new introduction course is the design andconstruction of an autonomous mobile robot by student teams, similar to the CSU, Chico model.The project requires students to apply
betweenengineering education researchers and machine learning researchers, we can work together at theintersection of machine learning and discipline-based education research. During the qualitativecoding process, we shared multiple perspectives on how students could discuss differentconcepts so that we could work towards making a more diverse codebook. When evaluating thecodes generated by machine learning analysis alongside the results from manual coding, wediscussed how to best work towards a better coding process to help train algorithms.LimitationsThis study did not factor in the differences between instructors and their context or instructionalmoves. For example, some instructors may emphasize the importance of written responsesdifferently, impacting
director of interdisciplinary graduate programs. Her research awards include U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE), a National Science Foundation CAREER award, and two outstanding publication awards from the American Educational Research Association for her journal articles. All of Dr. Borrego’s degrees are in Materials Science and Engineering. Her M.S. and Ph.D. are from Stanford University, U.S.A, and her B.S. is from University of Wisconsin- Madison, U.S.A.Michael J. Prince (Professor) professorMadeleine Smith © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Reducing Student
students can more easilyobtain manufacturing experience while building on their design knowledge and producing theparts that they need for their projects.The Artisan and Fabrication LaboratoryThe Artisan and Fabrication Laboratory (AFL) at a large Midwestern university providesengineering students, faculty, and staff with hands-on access to a state-of-the-art manufacturingfacility in a “maker-space” like environment. The mission of the AFL is multifaceted, but highlyfocused on student learning. Essentially, students are provided the opportunity to manufacturetheir own parts while being overseen by laboratory staff that provide expert training on not onlymachine operation, but also on safety best-practices. The laboratory is designed to mimic
(ethics,communications, team work, creativity, ...), students tend (consciously or not) to develop a beliefthat engineering is nothing but a mixture of science and technology and that complementarystudies are just a necessary evil to get easier access to professional recognition upon graduation.4Thirdly, in supporting the two solitudes, or even in allowing it to exist, engineering schools givestudents a wrong signal, a somewhat distorted view of engineering in which ethics seems to haveno bearing on design, creativity has no impact on problem solving, and team work has no impacton the quality of the work performed. In a way, it is as if engineering schools sometimes gavetheir students the implicit message that it is possible for engineers to work
, and maintains a portfolio of NSF and private grants to support STEM and CTE pathways in the region.Christopher Russell Christopher Russell is the Information and Engineering Technologies Project Manager at Northern Vir- ginia College. His research focuses on developing novel methods of integrating digital fabrication into formal and informal STEM instruction. Currently, he manages two NSF ATE awards - Makers By Design, a design thinking professional learning program for interdisciplinary groups of educators, and Product Design Incubator, a summer-long entrepreneurship program for community college students.Antarjot Kaur ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Building Data
Paper ID #23944Technology’s Role in Student Understanding of Mathematics in Modern Un-dergraduate Engineering CoursesAndrew Phillips, The Ohio State University Andrew H. Phillips graduated summa cum laude from The Ohio State University in May 2016 with a B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering and with Honors Research Distinction. He is currently fin- ishing his M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering, and then he will pursue a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. His engineering education interests include first-year engineering, active learning, learning theory, and teaching design, programming, and mathematics. As a
different major.IntroductionThere is strong evidence of student flexibility and vacillation around career options post-graduation from college. Specifically, a single interaction or experience (such as a co-op) cansometimes mean the difference between taking a job after graduation in engineering or anotherfield.1 Further, research suggests that cooperative education and internships result in increasedsocial and cultural capital of those who participate, which can contribute to their ability to secureemployment after graduation.2 Student perceptions of the engineering field, which can be shapedby undergraduate work experiences, can also impact persistence in engineering programs.3-7While there is a growing literature examining the relationship
knowledge introduced to the cadetsduring the first quarter of the course. Experience 2 shows that students learn and develop problemsolving skills best through a three-step process: (1) Introduction: knowledge of the skill or toolis introduced in a traditional lecture manner. (2) Bridging: understanding the skill begins byusing it, generally on a familiar situation. (3) Application: confidence and competence with theskill are strengthened by extending the use to a new situation. In Engr 110Z, Mini-Workshops4,5and structured homework assignments were used to accomplish Steps (1) and (2). For Step (3),strengthening the skill was inherent in applying it to the Mars mission project.Mini-Workshops – Each mini-workshop was designed around an Assignment
- gineering and Applied Science Dean’s Performance Award, and the Best Technical Publication Award from the Journal of Safety, Health, and Environmental Research for a paper on a new teaching innova- tion. He has also selected as an ASCE ExCEEd Teaching Fellow Teaching Mentor and as a President’s Teaching and Learning Collaborative Member. Page 23.1139.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Teaching construction hazard recognition through high fidelity augmented realityABSTRACTThe ability of designers, managers, and workers to identify
the College of Engineering. With her background in industry, she is keenly aware that the sector-wide academisation and de-contextualisation of engineering education is leading to an engineering sectorthat struggles to relate theory to practice. Patricia teaches creative design modules that give students tools and techniques (Human-centered design, VR collaborative design tools) to find their own brand of creativity in engineering design, while prompting students to consider how their individualprivilege and biases impact on their design decisions.Dr. Catherine Groves , Swansea University A Chartered Occupational Psychologist and Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy, Catherine draws on over 20 years
situation, coupled with the growing demand for a technically skilledlabor force, business leaders, policymakers, educational institutions, and activists haveresponded by crafting numerous outreach campaigns to appeal to women to becomeengineers. For the most part, there has been a tendency to see any effort to recruit womento engineering as positive, with little consideration given to the manner in which suchcampaigns are designed to achieve their goals. In this paper, I offer a critical examinationof three prominent outreach strategies and how they present ideas about how best toengage women in engineering. I argue that the messaging in all of these programscharacterizes women as a homogenous entity, without considering questions of
Teaching” 2nd Ed, San Francisco, Wiley 200912 Watkins, Gregory K. “Engineering Graphics: The Fate of Pencil, Paper, and the 2-D Drawing”13 Contero, Manual, et al. “Learning Support Tools for Developing Spatial Abilities in Engineering Design”14 Westmoreland et al. “Sketching During Mechanical Design: Studying Sketching at the University of Maryland”, ASEE National Conference 2009 AC 2009-157015 Evans et al. “Attributes of Engineering Graduates and Their Impact on Curriculum Design” 1993 American Society for Engineering Education. Reprinted from Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 82, No. 4, October 1993. Journal of Engineering Education16 McArthur, J. M., & Wellner, K. L. (1996). Reexamining spatial ability within a
unit for analysis by WVU professors to determine the effectiveness of the unit from acontent and engineering knowledge perspective. The data is used to make modifications to theunit for future use and planning for new workshops.2.3 TIME Kit Development: Stage ThreeStage three is the ongoing research and program evaluation. Our goal for the 2009 workshop isto conduct a full field evaluation on every TIME Kit developed (20). Each teacher whoimplements a unit and a comparison teacher in that same school will conduct pre and postassessment of engineering content, math content, and student attitudes related to that unit. Thisevaluation design will allow us to examine whether learning and attitude changes differ amongstudents who receive TIME Kit
, University of Michigan Robin Fowler is a Technical Communication lecturer and a Engineering Education researcher at the University of Michigan. Her teaching is primarily in team-based engineering courses, and her research focuses on equity in communication and collaboration as well as in group design decision making (judgment) under uncertainty. She is especially interested in how power relationships and rhetorical strategies affect group judgment in engineering design; one goal of this work is to to understand factors that inhibit full participation of students who identify with historically marginalized groups and investigate evidence-based strategies for mitigating these inequities. In addition, she is interested in