J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause, Arizona State University Stephen J. Krause is Professor in the School of Materials in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of bridging engineering and education, design and selection of materials, general materials engineering, polymer science, and characterization of materials. His research interests are in innovative education in engineering and K- 12 engineering outreach. He has been working on Project Pathways, an NSF supported Math Science Partnership, in developing modules for Physics and Chemistry and also a course on Engineering Capstone Design. He has also co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory for
curricula with industrial needs. The proposed three-year project would focus on: a) identifying curricular activities exhibiting astrong correlation with student co-op work performance; b) designing andimplementing processes allowing the systematic use of employer assessment incurriculum design; c) evaluating the impact of changes in curricular design uponstudent work performance; d) piloting and contrasting projects in both differentacademic fields and at different colleges; and e) developing a set of best practicesto be used for further refinement and dissemination of the process. Initialcollaborators include University of Cincinnati (UC) academic units as follows:the Department of Architecture (College of Design, Architecture, Art, andPlanning
lived experiences. This study aims to shed light on how challengingmath coursework can impact self-efficacy and retention for students who enter engineeringprograms below a calculus level and provide research-backed suggestions for improving theexperience these students have during their college journey, thus increasing retention inengineering programs. Early findings suggest that positive faculty-student interactions, a sense ofbelonging, and the ability to feel success (instead of defeat) in early mathematics coursework arekey contributors to what improves self-efficacy for students who struggle in math-specificcourses.Keywords:self-efficacy, mathematics, engineering education, underserved populationsIntroductionThe Mindset Report published
different study populations.While the primary objective of the project is to understand the benefit of the use of thiseducational technology, the sensor-based laboratories are designed to be accessible for use asmodules by college faculty and by secondary school teachers and students as well so that, if thetechnology should prove effective, broader implementation will be practical. This paperintroduces the methodology of the experiment and reports on the status of the development oflaboratories. A variety of laboratory activities have been developed, including two that have beendeveloped in sensor-based and non-sensor-based versions.The use of technology in the classroomAlthough there are many who assume that the use of classroom technology has
exposure. The reduction in water contact angle is closely related to the reduction in themechanical strengths. Two of the engineering students, also authors of this study, designed,developed and performed these tests on the 3D printed specimens. The BS students have usedthese research activities for their Engineer of 2020 requirements. Overall, these studies greatlybenefit undergraduate engineering students for their future academic studies in differentinstitutions.AcknowledgementsThe authors greatly acknowledge the Wichita State University for the financial and technicalsupports of this study.References[1] Cantrell, J., Rohde, S., Damiani, D., Gurnani, R., Disandro, L., Anton, J., Young, A., Jerez,A., Steinbach, D., Kroese, C., and Ifju, P. (2016
stratigraphy, (2)estimates of the safety factor for both the existing and remediated slopes, and (3) a qualitativediscussion of the probable environmental impacts of the remediation project. Needless to say,this project was an extremely well-received and worthwhile experience.INDUSTRIAL SUPPORT FOR THE PROGRAMThe number of scholarships and job offers received by Cal Poly graduates interested ingeotechnical engineering indicates that industry supports the hands-on approach. Manypractitioners recruit almost exclusively at Cal Poly because of the practice-oriented educationthat its graduates have received. Interest by the professional community in the Cal Polygeotechnical engineering program has led to tremendous cooperation and support. As discussed
Paper ID #38679Renewed Hope: Utilizing Freirean Pedagogies to Enhance MulticulturalSTEM ClassroomsCassandra Puletapuai, Colorado State University Cassandra Puletapuai is a construction management graduate research assistant, graduate teaching assis- tant, a doctoral student at Colorado School University in the School of Education in Education, Equity, and Transformation focusing on Construction Management. Her research interests include sociocultural and participatory action research practices that connect both the individual’s and industry’s vision for beneficial and tangible outcomes and increasing multicultural
diagnosticscourse was developed to prepare engineering technology students for the sophisticated testingand analysis technology of the maintenance field. The conceptual content of the course has beenrelatively constant; however, the laboratory activities have evolved significantly to adoptadditional technologies and software. This paper will review the original course design andcompare it to recent course offerings, with emphasis on the ongoing effort to incorporatemonitoring of a variety of operating parameters and to engage with industry.BackgroundThrough advances in solid-state electronics, instrumentation, and computing capabilities in the1970s and 1980s, the field of machinery condition monitoring obtained the technology needed tomake predictive
. Davis illuminates the nature of professional engineering;“knowing engineering ethics is as much a part of knowing how to engineer as knowing how tocalculate stress or design a circuit is. Indeed, insofar as engineering is a profession, knowing howto calculate stress or design a circuit is in part knowing what the profession allows, forbids, orrequires.”1In this paper we look at ethics across the curriculum and implementing engineering ethicseducation via the case methodology. A brief presentation on the history of engineering educationis followed by a discussion of ethics in engineering education. Case methodology is examinedincluding a look at sources for cases and case research. Finally, the two-stage engineering ethicseducation model used by
, spring semester of the sophomore year, wasmade to mirror spring semester of the first year at UWI-St. Augustine to facilitate futuresemester-length student exchanges. An aspirational goal of this program is that each engineeringstudent will have at least one study and/or research abroad experience before graduation. Furtherthere is need for adaptation of an assessment instrument to evaluate the global skills the studentsdevelop because of these international research experiences. Several instruments are beingconsidered, such as, Beliefs, Events, and Values Inventory (BEVI), Global Perspective Inventory(GPI) and Intercultural Development Inventory (IDI). 8References1. ASEE. Going the distance: best practices and strategies for retaining
Page 23.781.3to compile simple PHA's to put the process to practice. To guide and facilitate compilation ofthe information and clarify our expectations, we are providing tables outlining the neededinformation. A simple and uniform format is expected to make the procedure less cumbersomeand help establish a methodical approach that can be applied across systems for bothexperimental and design course tasks, or in future applications beyond the classroom. Thetemplate is based on the industrial experience of one of the authors (M.F.), who contributed toand compiled PHA’s while performing research and development work in the fields ofmicrochannel technology (Velocys, Inc.) and biotechnology (Draths Corporation).Unit OperationsIn the Unit Operations
,” Engineering Design Graphics Journal, Winter 1993, p29.16. Flori, Ralph E., Koen, Mary A., and Oglesby, David B., “Basic Engineering Software for Teaching (BEST) Dynamics,” Journal of Engineering Education, January 1996, p61.17. Gramoll, K/, “Using Working Model to Introduce Design to a Freshman Engineering Course,” Proceeding of the ASEE 1994 Annual Meeting, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, June 26-29, 1994.18. Iannelli, J., “Mechanics in Action: On the Development of Interactive Computer Laboratories for Engaging Engineering Mechanics Education,” Proceeding of the TBEED 1994 Annual Conference, Gatlinburg, Tn, November 18-19, 1994. WILLIAM E. COLEDr. Cole received his Bachelors of
experience is not credible? This is often witnessed in computerprogramming. What is the best approach to teaching programming? There have been groups thatadvocate that you use a language that is designed to teach programming. Others advocate that youteach a language used by a relevant community to help the students adapt to that community. Whilethis might seem minor – consider the idea that there are computing programs in existence in theUnited States that taught COBOL and only COBOL for more than twenty-five years. Also considerthe idea that there is a body of discussion about how COBOL is the worst language to use forteaching programming. Who was right is not a matter for this paper, however, the question “WouldCOBOL have been an introduction to
participant’s design outcomes [10][11]. Further still, many papersaddress different ideation methods and their efficacy [12] [13]. However, all previouslyreferenced papers follow participants who all have similar engineering and problem-solvingexperience. This paper not only addresses the different ideation methods but also compares theoutcomes between student and practicing engineers. By understanding the importance of learningdifferent ideation methods and detailing how to use them effectively, this paper describes how tooptimize problem-solving to best demonstrate the competencies that employers are seeking. This paper and associated research is for a Senior Honors Project within the engineeringdiscipline. The inspiration behind this project
ethics and ethical frameworks. With the knowledge gainedfrom this research, first-year engineering programs can better explore how incoming students viewdecision-making and design more effective instructional practices. BackgroundIntroductionEthics is the “standards of conduct that apply to everyone” [1]. It is the difference between rightand wrong. People use ethics to determine how to act when confronted with any situation; askingquestions such as “who will this benefit?”, “who will this harm?”, and “what are theconsequences?”. However, engineering ethics is different from everyday ethics. Engineeringethics are a set of professional ethics, or “those special morally permissible standards of conductthat
of reducing interventions from the first year to thesecond year can provide valuable insights for shaping future interventions and best practices.This paper examines the second-year academic performance of the first cohort of SSP studentsby assessing them against comparable engineering students who did not receive the same first-year academic support resources. The research question driving the study is:What impact does reducing academic support from the first year to the second year have onSSP students' academic progress and success?The SUCCESS Scholars ProgramThe SSP, funded by the NSF, was created to support low-income first-year engineering studentsby offering academic resources, financial aid, community-building initiatives, and
paper.Additionally, the upcoming generation views materials retrieved online differently than thoseobtained from other sources. Clifton Poole stated “there is a tendency to think that cutting andpasting from the Internet is a form of good research and not plagiarism.”6 Several students arefurther confused because of online access to scholarly journals and conference reports throughtheir libraries web sites. Townley and Parsell note that “the Internet presents mixed messagesthat may confuse people as to what is and what is not acceptable appropriation practice.”7 The Internet also facilitates the ultimate form of plagiarism, turning in someone else’spaper as one’s own. A simple search for “research papers” on Google will produce a list ofplaces to
American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), serving as the past Program Chair for the Minorities in En- gineering Division. He has served as a chair, vice-chair, program chair, and program committee member for numerous conferences of ASEE.Dr. Mohd Abdelgadir Khairi, Najran University I, Mohamed Khairi, my bachelor degree in computer science. I did my Masters in system science from University of Ottawa, Canada. My PH.D was in ”Master Data Management” from University of Phoenix. I have over 20 years of experience in IT industry - ten of them with Microsoft in Redmond, WA. Currently I’m assistant professor at University of Najran. In addition of teaching and Research I’m coordinator of graduation projects and
University. She spent 12 years teaching secondary science and engineering in Oklahoma, and is a 2014 recipient of the Presidential Award for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching.Dr. Nick Lux, Montana State University Dr. Nicholas Lux has is an Associate Professor of Curriculum and Instruction in MSU’s Department of Education. His teaching and research interests are in the area of educational technology. He has worked in the fields of K-12 and higher education for 18 years, and currently teaches in the Montana State University Teacher Education Program. He has experience in educational technology theory and practice in K-12 contexts and teacher education, with a focus on STEM teaching and learning, technology
transferable.The strength of the track approach is recognized by the National Security Agency (NSA). Thisgovernmental agency has created stringent, 10-point criteria for the evaluation of programs inComputer Science and Engineering and in Information Assurance. If these criteria are fullysatisfied, the institution is awarded the designation of National Center of Academic Excellence inInformation Assurance Education (NCAEIAE). Criteria 8 in the list in specifies that a qualifyingprogram must have declared concentrations in information assurance [12]: “Academic program, within a nationally or regionally accredited 4-year college or graduate-level university, has declared concentrations in IA. Identify the courses required for each
results of this study the benefitsoutweigh the costs (i.e., cost in time and effort).It is anticipated that future research efforts will include an expanded study to collect additionalassessment data from a more robust sampling. Statistical analysis of the data will determine thecritical indicators of the success of living learning communities. Evaluation of the criticalindicators will lead to the development of “best practices” for creating and sustaining livinglearning communities.References1. Bechtel, J. (2012). Building an Entrepreneurial Living-Learning Community. Innovation Living-Learning Community, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.2. Flynn, M.A., Everett, J. W., & Wittinghill, D. (2016). The impact of a living learning
. Harding, T. S., Lai, H.-Y., Tuttle, B. L., and White, C. V., “Integrating Manufacturing, Design and Teamwork into a Materials and Processes Selection Course,” 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Montreal, Canada, June 17-19, 2002. Session 1526.8. Newcomer, J. L., “An Industrial Robotics Course for Manufacturing Engineers,” 2016 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, LA, June 26 – 29, 2016. Paper ID 15654.9. Sirinterlikci, A., “Practical Hands-on Industrial Robotics Laboratory Development,” 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, San Antonio
Paper ID #38136Work in Progress: Exploring Leadership Orientations in theClassroomEmily Moore (Dr) Dr. Emily Moore is the Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto. Before becoming a professor in 2018, Emily spent more than twenty years as a professional engineer in industry, first with the Xerox Research Centre of Canada and then with Hatch Ltd. Emily's teaching and research interests include engineering leadership, systems thinking, and equity in engineering education and practice.Cindy Rottmann (Associate Director Research) Cindy Rottmann is the
rising junior and senior high school girls notidentifying engineering as a possible path. The target group was chosen deliberately: Too oftengirls with the promise and interest unknowingly narrow their options because they have notreceived the necessary support (1), encouragement or basic information. MTM is designed toreach them at a pivotal time to reinforce their interest and participation in math and science andto encourage them to continue to take the coursework necessary to succeed in an engineeringdiscipline. The camp also provides undergraduate and graduate women with leadershipopportunities as they role model positive behavior for campers.In brief, the camp is typical of many such offerings, designed as a comprehensive
Grid Technologies (ISGT) Conference, Minneapolis, MN.Furthermore, we have successfully cast engineering design problems as complex engineeringprojects. The most substantial research findings are currently being documented in a manuscript,and it will be submitted to a relevant, major journal such as The Engineering Economist for a peerreview in the very near future.3. MethodologyIn Spring 2017 and Fall 2017, the structure of the aforementioned elementary teaching moduletaught in IE 305 is as follows. The module consists of 4 class periods (50 minutes per period).Period 1. A pre-test, traditional net present value approach, new questions under uncertainty such as flexible design.Period 2. Using Min [9] (for Periods 2-4
the course topics, which must also be squeezed into an already full coursecurriculum. Finally, it has always been a priority of professors at Georgia Tech to introducesome applications to develop the "practical" skills of the students. The ABET 2000 Criterion 31recognizes the importance of this as a goal2.One weakness in many engineering syllabi is that most of the "practical" applications are left tothe senior Capstone Design courses. Thus, the student gains the false impression that design iswhere all of the "exciting" and "practical" work is performed. This false impression can havetwo major impacts. First, the student may not interview well in areas other than design. Inaddition, this can lead to a large pool of students designating their
both governmental and non-governmental organizations. Acharya has a M.Eng. in computer technology and a D.Eng. in computer science and information management with a concentration in knowledge dis- covery, both from the Asian Institute of Technology in Thailand. His teaching involvement and research interests are in the areas of software engineering and development (verification and validation) and enter- prise resource planning. He also has interest in learning objectives-based education material design and development. Acharya is a co-author of ”Discrete Mathematics Applications for Information Systems Professionals,” 2nd Ed., Prentice Hall. He is a life member of Nepal Engineering Association and is also a member
topics includedetailing all of the above structural components. The instructor starts typically with abrief theoretical background. The application of this theoretical introduction is usuallyfollowed by solving real or close to real life applications like designing a beam, a columnbase plate, or a footing. In many cases, design aids are available for students to performthis task. This may include tables, charts or computer programs.A common practice among instructors is to assign a project at the end of these courses.The essential function of such a project is to integrate what the students learn in bits andpieces throughout the term into one big task at its end. The main objective of this projectassignment is to make the learning process more
semiconductor devices, electronics, and renewable energy and his research areas include solar cells, battery monitoring systems and electric vehicles.James O’Brien, Villanova University Prof. O’Brien is a faculty member in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. He is the Coordinator for the New Freshman Program.Gerard Jones, Villanova University Dr. Jones is Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, where he has taught courses in heat transfer, fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, computational fluid mechanics, and solar thermal analysis. Currently, he serves as associate dean for the 900-student undergraduate engineering program. His recent service-learning work on analysis and design of
and has given presentations at national and international conferences. She served as Section Coordinator for the Twin Cities Section (1988-1989) and has been a Vice President on the Board of Directors for the Eastern Division (1994), Measurement Science and Technology (1995 to 1997), Publications (2001), Operations (2002-2004) and now Learning & Development (2005-present) where she is involved in developing long term objectives in metrology Education and Training. She has received the following awards for her work in metrology • NCSLI Best Paper Award (co-author), Applied Category (2007)• Arthur S. Flemming Award (2004); • Algie Lance “Best Paper” Award (tied