Collection

2024 South East Section Meeting

Authors

Morgan Green, Mississippi State University

why they were made. • Considering Risks – For the vapor power cycle installation, discuss any risks or strengths for each of the following: o Public health, safety, and welfare o Global factors o Cultural factors o Social factors o Environmental factors o Economic factorsProject OverviewThe assignments of the project spanned across the latter half of the Fall 2023 semester. Theproject included multiple deliverables with submission deadlines spread across the two months.Whether the specific assignment was completed individually or as a group is indicated inparentheses. • Power Plant Visit (individual grade, class went together) • Power Plant Visit Q&A assignment

Collection

2022 ASEE St. Lawrence Section Annual Conference

Authors

Syed Ali Kamal, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Matilde Luz Sanchez-Pena, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Publishing Limited, 2012.[13] E. Blosser, “An examination of Black women’s experiences in undergraduate engineering on a primarily white campus: Considering institutional strategies for change,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 52–71, 2020.[14] S. Leath and T. Chavous, “Black women’s experiences of campus racial climate and stigma at predominantly white institutions: Insights from a comparative and within-group approach for STEM and non-STEM majors,” J. Negro Educ., vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 125–139, 2018.[15] L. C. Brown, B. M. Williams, and Q. S. Williams, “Melanin messages: Black college women’s experiences and reflections on navigating colorism.,” J. Divers. High. Educ., 2021.[16] V. Borum and E. Walker, “What makes the

Conference Session

Capstone Design

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gene Dixon, East Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

prior art, customer objective(s), customer requirements,design economics, drawings, analytical results, engineering changes, test reports, and an openissues list4. Patent search results may also be included. As the design develops, the presentationshould provide insights into design activities, design alternatives considered and selected,technical/economic trade-off analysis and justifications, and conclusions21. Often the TDR process includes oral presentations. During oral presentations, designassumptions, analysis, alternatives and design methods are challenged during question andanswer (Q&A) portions of the TDR. Duesing4 (2004) states that it is “…critical that engineersexplain their concepts and designs to an engineering and

Conference Session

Improvements in ECE Signals and Systems

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cory J. Prust, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Steven Holland, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Richard W. Kelnhofer, Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

RTL-SDR, are capable of streaming 8-bit I/Q samples througha USB 2.0 interface at a maximum rate of 3.2MS/s. A variety of RTL-SDR variants are Page 24.1283.5currently available, the primary difference being the specific RF tuner paired with theRTL2832U. Figure 1 below shows one such variant based on the Rafael Micro R820T tunerwhich is capable of tuning between 24-1766MHz. This particular dongle is widely available at acost of $18 USD. Figure 1: The RTL-SDR based on the R820T tuner and the mobile studioTogether with a host PC running the appropriate software, each student can have their ownmobile platform cable of recording

Conference Session

Engagement in Formal and Informal Learning Environments

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nesim Halyo, Hampton University; Qiang Le, Hampton University

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

students. The second videowas a lecture on the “Design of Proportional plus Derivative (PD) Controllers” in a senior level“Introduction to Control Systems” course. And there are typically 15 students in “Introductionto Control Systems”. The “Introduction to Engineering” lecture was shown to students at thebeginning of the class. Even though the video lecture covered the same slides containing thesame information which was presented in a normal lecture on this subject, the video lecture tookless time to view, allowing time for a Q&A session and comments from students.For the second video lecture, students were given a copy of the video to view at theirconvenience, at a time and place of their own choosing and in a setting of their own choosing

Conference Session

Computers in Education (CoED) Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fred W DePiero, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

(based on result of pretest on learning objectives with confidence declarations). 4. Content – Why?13 a. Describe motivations for the new topic9,16 i. Describe a problem that is difficult to answer without new topic ii. Describe an application enabled thanks to the new topic, and importance / societal impact of application b. Include historical context or fun facts 5. Content – What? a. Present overview b. Present details: derive and describe concept, process, technique, analysis or method c. Engage students via simple Q&A, with feedback, to keep students

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT) Technical Session 4

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Radana Dvorak, Saint Martin's University; Farzin Bahadori, Saint Martin's University

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT)

• Hash Functions • Symmetric and Asymmetric Key • Quantum-Safe Cryptography Quantum Information • Density Matrices • Bloch Sphere • Multiple Systems and Reduced StatesIBM • Build your Ciruits Weeks 3 , 5 Hands-on PracticesQuantum • Apply your Gates &6Composer https://quantum.ibm.com/composer • Analyze Q-SphereandSimulatorIBM Labs • Jupyter Lab Weeks 3 - 7 Hands-on Practices • Matplotlib

Collection

2006 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Mark Miles; C.M. Chewar

Lab2 Lab3 Lab4 Lab5 Lab6 Trial 1 3 3.3 3.1 4 4.2 4.3 Trial 2 3.3 3.8 3.6 3.9 4 4.1 Q: How much did you learn from this Lab Assignment? (0-5, 0 being lowest) Table 2: Student feedback from Mid-Course and End-Course Survey Pre Mid-Term Post Mid-Term Lab1 Lab2 Lab3 Lab4 Lab5 Lab6 Trial 1 3.8 3.6 3.6 3.9 4 3.8 Trial 2 4.2 4.5 4.2 4

Collection

2016 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Vazgen Shekoyan; Sunil Dehipawala; Kimberly Riegel; George Tremberger; David Lieberman; Tak Cheung

its power consumption inoperation where heat is dissipated as the current flows through the resistive elements inelectricity lessons 29, 30. We also observed that students like to read commercial application noteson IC chip heat dissipation rather than the textbook examples 31, and that they were surprisedwhen we discussed how IBM uses warm water to cool the SuperMUC Petascale System inLeibniz Supercomputing Centre (Germany) but uses cool water to cool Blue Gene/Q inLivermore Lab (America) 32, 33.The student performance in critical thinking has been assessed as satisfactory (score above 75%using highly competent =1, competent = 0.8 and needs improvement = 0.6). The rubricguideline is displayed in Table 1. The assessment results showed that

Collection

2014 ASEE Zone 1 Conference

Authors

Verica Radisavljevic-Gajic

pair (C1 AL1 , CAL1 ) ) must be observable. It can be shown that qˆ (t ) = pˆ (t ) − K1 y (t ) ⇒ qˆ (t ) = pˆ (t ) − K1 y (t ) (31) this condition is satisfied if the original system is observablewe obtain the reduced-order observer for qˆ (t ) represented by (the pair ( A, C ) is observable). We can set the reduced-the following linear dynamic system observer eigenvalues using the following MATLAB code: qˆ (t ) = Aq qˆ (t ) + Bq u (t ) + K q y (t ) (32) >> % checking the observability condition where

Collection

2010 ASEE Zone 4 Conference

Authors

Gemunu Happawana; Arvind Gopi

ξ m q Cω Kω Fig. 1. One - sixth tractor modelThis basic model is used in a number of different circumstances to describe the behavior of avehicle suspension system. Mathematically, the relationships embodied in the model are givenin Eq. (4). M w  z  C pl (  z )  K a (  z ) m    C (q   )  K (q   )  C pl (  z )  K a (  z ) (4)Where Mw is the one sixth tractor model effective sprung mass. This “one-sixth tractor” modelcan be implemented readily in a variety of simulation packages such

Collection

2015 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Susan Wainscott; Julie Longo

. C. (1988). Developing a model of the library search process: Cognitive and affective aspects. RQ, 28(2), 232-242.5. Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (1997). Writing a research proposal: The role of library anxiety, statistics anxiety, and composition anxiety. Library & Information Science Research, 19(1), 14.6. Jiao, Q. G., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Lichtenstein, A. A. (1996). Library anxiety: Characteristics of “at-risk” college students. Library & Information Science Research, 18(2), 151-163.7. Jiao, Q. G., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Lichtenstein, A. A. (1996). Library anxiety: Characteristics of “at-risk” college students. Library & Information Science Research, 18(2), 151-163.8. Daly, J. A. (1978). Writing

Collection

2025 ASEE -GSW Annual Conference

Authors

Mohammad A Aliedeh, New Mexico State University

T2 Q1 T3 I1 V1 V2 V3 T4 Q V4 R2 R2 I R1 R1 R4 R4

Collection

2021 Northeast Section Meeting

Authors

Douglas E. Dow

modification was to present each question as an image topercent of questions that were not recorded. make the process more difficult for a student to cut-and-paste a question for a web search or for contract cheating. Another TABLE I. RESULTS OF WEB SERVICE EXAM * modification was to set a time limit on how long the student had to answer each question. Year Term Exam Num of Num Q Num of Q Student missed (%) The prototype of

Conference Session

Using Computation and Modeling, Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D) Technical Session 3

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristen Schumacher, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Sonali Joshi, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Jina Kang, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Eric Shaffer, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Jessica Raley, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Jose Nijaid Arredondo, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Brandon Mark Buncher, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Rajan Patkar, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Katherine Zine, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Daniel Alfredo Caballero, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Alexandria Tucker, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Mireille Tan, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Christopher Vistian, Physics Outreach at Illinois Through New Technologies

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D)

given questionQ, we define Cohen’s d [43], including Hedges’ small sample size correction [44], as 2 3 N 2 µpost µpre 4 5, dQ = q 2 (1) pool N 2 N 1 2 2 2 (npre 1)s2pre + (npost 1)s2post pool

Collection

ASEE-NE 2022

Authors

Kai Ren, Wentworth Institute of Technology

)assignment is due on the Sunday midnight of the second week and lab1 report is due on the Sundaymidnight of the nineth week. There are 6 HW and 3 lab assignments, one midterm, and one finalexam. Lab 3 is the lab project, where a 20 minutes (15 minutes presentation + 5 minutes Q & A)conference-like final presentation is required for all lab groups (two or three students are in onegroup).Antenna Labs Using FEKO Objectives, problem statements, initial antenna parameter calculations based on correspondingtheories learnt in lectures, and guided antenna simulations are provided in each lab. In the first lab,students design and optimize a quarter-wavelength monopole antenna using the full-wavenumerical simulation tool FEKO, understand the ground size

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Technical Session - Integrated Engineering and Interdisciplinary Impacts

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohammed K Faris, University of Mosul / Iraq; Charles Pierce, University of South Carolina; Gurcan Comert

researchexperience(s). These results reveal a highly favorable opinion of the overall student experience.The level of satisfaction was the most positive indicator, with 85% of respondents expressingthat they were very satisfied with this experience. Across all three questions, just one responseindicated a negative opinion of summer research as a learning experience. As shown in Table 5,one respondent selected “Well, it was better than working just for a salary, but I don't think Ilearned a lot.”Table 3. Student Expectations of Research Experience Q: Think about the expectations you had about the research experience before it began. Use the scale below to evaluate your current feelings. The experience was worse than I expected

Conference Session

Incorporating Technology in the Classroom

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Guenter Bischof, Joanneum; Christian Steinmann; Thomas Kainz; Eric Menard; Robert Poetsch; Maximilian Sterkl; Christoph Tröster

L =T − U = 12 m ( x 2 + z 2 ) − 12 k (r + mg k ) 2 − mgz , (2)with x and z being x= (l + r )sin(ϑ ) and z = z − (l + r ) cos(ϑ ) , (3)expressed in cylindrical coordinates (see e.g. [7]).The Lagrangian together with a Rayleigh dissipation function R(qk ) = (1 2) β qk2 , whichaccounts for non-conservative damping forces is inserted in the Euler-Lagrange differentialequations in order to derive the equations of motion of the system: d ∂L ∂L ∂R

Collection

14th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference

Authors

Dan Burleson, University of Houston; Janice Quiroz Perez, University of Houston

activity such as an employer information session, career center/student-led workshop, or networking event.Activities completed by participants included a Resume Café event where more than fortyemployers volunteered to review student resumes before the career fair. Another event, theEngineering Networking Social, provided students with an opportunity to practice their elevatorpitches with representatives from 20 companies in a less formal setting as they rotated from tableto table. More than 10 companies hosted information sessions before the career fair where theyshared recruiting and hiring practices and provided a platform for students to engage in Q&Asessions.To address the resume barrier noted in the previous iteration, student

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Danowitz, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Kacey Beddoes, San Jose State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

under grants EEC#1929484 and #1929478. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.References[1] R. L. Spitzer, K. Kroenke, J. B. Williams, and P. H. Q. P. C. S. Group, “Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study,” Jama, vol. 282, no. 18, pp. 1737–1744, 1999.[2] R. P. Cameron and D. Gusman, “The primary care PTSD screen (PC-PTSD): development and operating characteristics,” Primary Care Psychiatry, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 2003.[3] D. Van Dam, T. Ehring, E. Vedel, and P. M. G. Emmelkamp, “Validation of the Primary Care Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shengfan Zhang, University of Arkansas; Eric Specking, University of Arkansas

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

pre-program to prepare the participants for the summer program. In thefirst year, the RET participants learned more about faculty mentors in the pre-program throughtheir bios, project descriptions, short video introductions, and more. We also hosted a virtualmeet-the-mentors session, where RET participants met with the mentors virtually, learned moreabout their research, and discussed potential project ideas. In the second year, based on the first-year evaluation feedback, we changed the pre-program to information Q&A sessions where theteachers learn about the program requirements, ask questions and share concerns, while theprogram team also learns more about the teachers, their subject areas, and their goals for theprogram.Summer Program

Conference Session

Committee on Professional Practice Presents: Topics in the Academic-Industry Zone

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yufeng Hu, Western Michigan University; Elise DeCamp, Western Michigan University; Osama Abudayyeh, Western Michigan University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)

Change Communication.[17] J.E. DeWaters, C. Andersen A. Calderwood, and S.E. Powers, “Improving climate literacy with project-basedmodules rich in educational rigor and relevance, Journal of Geoscience Education, September 2014, 62:3, 469-484,DOI: 10.5408/13-056.1.Appendix: Full SurveyTitle: Climate Literacy and Engagement Survey[Note: Correct answers are indicated by an asterisk, unless otherwise indicated.]I. Climate Science/Mitigation Section:1) What is the greenhouse effect? [Q. 1 of Climate Literacy Quiz, Cleanet.org] a. Certain gases in the atmosphere trap heat and warm the Earth * b. Life on Earth 'exhales' gas that warms up the atmosphere c. The tilt of the Earth changes the amount of solar energy the Earth receives

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Endeavors: Mechatronics, Robotics, and Technology

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Vetria L. Byrd Ph.D., Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

% 30% 30% 29% 25% Percentage 20% 15% 12% 10% 10% 10% 8% 5% 1% 0% Q P G K R A N Manufacturer Figure 5 Refined visualization showing the percentage of cereals produced by each

Conference Session

Advances in Materials Education

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Claes Fredriksson, ANSYS - Education Division and University West, Sweden

Tagged Divisions

Materials

, price and cost information that enables production cost to be assessed in a simple cost model.References1. See Granta Design homepage, URL: https://grantadesign.com/education (available February 3,2020)2. Ashby, M. F., Materials Selection in Mechanical Design (5th edition) Butterworth Heinemann,Oxford, 20163. Figuerola, M, Lai, Q, Ashby, M., Kahlmeyer, E., The CES EduPack Products, Materials andProcesses Database - a White Paper, https://grantadesign.com/teachingresource/papers/(available February 3, 2020)4. Fredriksson, C., Melia, H. and Cesons, J., An Introductory Teaching Resource for MaterialsScience and Engineering, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Seattle (USA), June 14-17, 20155. C. Fredriksson, An Innovative Digital Tool

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division Poster Session (Works in Progress)

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Yah-el Har-El, Temple University; Thomas V. Edwards Jr., Temple University; Ruth Ochia P.E., Temple University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

entrepreneurialpassion: Conceptual foundations and scale validation. Journal of business venturing, 28(3), 373-396.[3] Edwards, TV and Pillapakkam, S. (2018) “Engineering leadership and entrepreneurial personality,”Proceedings of the American Society of Management: International Conference. (accepted)[4] Li, C. Q., Harichandran, R. S., Erdil, N. O., Nocito-Gobel, J., & Carnasciali, M. (2018, June),Investigating the Entrepreneurial Mindset of Engineering and Computer Science Students. Paperpresented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah.https://peer.asee.org/30726[5] Svensson, OH, Adawi, T, Lundqvist, M, Middleton, KW. (2020) Entrepreneurial engineeringpedagogy: models, tradeoffs and discourses, European Journal of Engineering

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Pearl Elizabeth Ortega-Darwin, Texas A&M University; Kristi J. Shryock, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Student

available for four weeks in order togive students adequate time to take the exam, review their material, and remediate any mathknowledge that the students would need to know for the course.Competency-based assessments give students equal opportunities to be successful in their classesas many students have different backgrounds of learning. Flagging “at-risk” students and givingthem the tools they need to learn the course prerequisite material can help build their sense ofbelonging and positive attitude in the classroom. Similar competency and remedial assessmentsfrom other departments and universities have proved to be helpful to their students by loweringthe D/F/Q rates, creating shifts in letter grades, and increasing the rate of students

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 11

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Michael S. Rugh, Texas A&M University; Donald Joseph Beyette, Texas A&M University; Mary Margaret Capraro, Texas A&M University; Robert M. Capraro, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

more. He has taught integrated math and science, elementary math methods, and problem solving in math at Texas A&M University. He is currently serving on several review boards and is Assistant Editor for the Journal of Urban Mathematics Education.Mr. Donald Joseph Beyette, Texas A&M University Donald Beyette is a master with thesis student at Texas A&M University studying abstractive summariza- tion, Q/A models, ontology, and engineering education. Current research areas are focusing on systems to model a users learning behavior with DIME.Dr. Mary Margaret Capraro, Dr. Mary Margaret Capraro is a Professor of Mathematics Education in the Department of Teaching, Learning and Culture and Co-Director of

Conference Session

Approaches to Curriculum and Policy

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Afroditi Vennie Filippas, Virginia Commonwealth University; Rebecca Segal, Virginia Commonwealth University ; Alen Docef, Virginia Commonwealth University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

faculty interactions with math facultyOf the faculty who responded to the survey, two had met with mathematics faculty (Q.3). Bothhad attended the special meeting we held in the spring of 2017 and had participated in theclassroom observation opportunity, and one of them had also participated in one-on-onemeetings with math faculty (Q.4). In both cases, these meetings only changed their perceptionson faculty engagement (Q.5). The interaction that was listed as being the most impactful was themeeting/classroom observation, but the one-on-one visits also ranked high on the list (Q.6). Itdoes seem, though, that building in opportunities for faculty socialization and active exchange ofideas is important.Questions 8: Have you provided feedback or input

Conference Session

CoNECD Session : Day 1 Slot 7 Technical Session 2

Collection

2021 CoNECD

Authors

Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Cara Margherio, University of Washington; Kerice Doten-Snitker, University of Washington; Sriram Mohan, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Eva Andrijcic, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

stakeholders & network connections b. Briefly present research findings c. Group share-outWhy should stakeholders participate in shared vision? (15 minutes) a. Activity on brainstorming what motivates your potential stakeholders, and how this impacts how you will engage with them b. Briefly present research findings c. Group discussionWhat strategies encourage shared vision? (15 minutes) a. Activity on identifying short-term wins b. Briefly present research findings c. Group share-outGroup discussion and Q&A (10 minutes)Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations in this material arethose of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the

Conference Session

Teaching and Assessment in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Deborah S. Goldberg, University of Maryland, College Park; Jinwang Zou, University of Maryland, College Park; Ganesh Sriram, University of Maryland

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

. Sem + MEB MEB only Avg. Avg. Q# Question text p<0.05 p<0.05 Change Change I am confident I will obtain an undergraduate Q1 0.24 -0.68 * degree in engineering. I am confident I will obtain an undergraduate Q2 -0.16 -0.91 * degree in chemical engineering. Q3 I know what chemical engineering is. 1.36