Paper ID #14767Motivating Students with an Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Airmanshipand Research ProgramDr. George York, U.S. Air Force Academy George York, PhD, PE, is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the United States Air Force Academy, CO, and is currently the Director of the Academy Center for UAS Research. He received his PhD in Electrical Engineering from the University of Washington. His research interests include the cooperative control of intelligent systems, digital signal processing, and embedded computer systems. He is a Senior Member IEEE.Col. Jeffrey Butler, U.S. Air Force Academy
affective factors vary among college undergraduates?,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education 2019 Pacific Southwest Meeting, 2019, pp. 1–13.[19] C. Striolo, M. Pollock, and A. Godwin, “Staying or leaving: contributing factors for U.K. engineering students’ decisions to pursue careers in engineering industry,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., pp. 1–25, Jan. 2020.[20] T. Humphries-Smith and C. Hunt, “An exploration of progression rates of widening participation students on to an integrated master of engineering,” Int. J. High. Educ., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 69–78, 2017.[21] “Fixing the foundations: Creating a more prosperous nation.”[22] M. Scheidt, R. Senkpeil, J. Chen, A. Godwin, and E. Berger
outcome-based educational framework. She has also incorporated theories on social cognitive career choices and student attrition mitigation to investigate the effectiveness of institutional interventions in increasing the retention and academic success of talented engineering students from economically disadvantaged families. She’s also involved in a project that explores the relationship between the institutional policies at UPRM and faculty and graduate students’ motivation to create good relationships between advisors and advisees.Prof. Oscar Marcelo Suarez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Professor Oscar Marcelo Suarez joined the University of Puerto Rico - Mayaguez in 2000. He holds a BS in Aeronautical &
ofchange -- (See Appendix A). The logic model illustrates the logical relationship among programinputs (such as the grant funds and faculty expertise), activities (such as the introductoryengineering design course) and desired outputs (such as numbers of participating students) andoutcomes (such as increases in student interest in clean energy careers). This logic model wasused to inform the program design, including activities with students. In addition, the logicmodel was used to frame measures of success. This paper will describe our efforts, examine themeasurements of our goals, and discuss lessons learned over the three iterations of our program.BackgroundThree different cohorts of students participated in the program between 2013-18. Each
., teaching but not tenured or tenure-line) currently listed on the departmentalwebsite, none are women. Similarly, in Bioengineering, none of the non-faculty teaching stafflisted on the website are female. This can lead to a delegitimizing of the academic purpose andauthority of SEEFs due to unintended gender bias, and less emphasis on the organizationalculture capital (the shared sense of identity, norms, values and trust) and role models needed forundergraduate students to develop an engineering identity. This includes students seeingthemselves as a future educators or in an academic role such as a faculty member, which is a keyaspect of supporting diversity within the undergraduate population [36], with 41 percent of the1,525 students within the
about each of the fields of engineering, as well as connect with students and staff members in those departments.Throughout her high school’s 3 course STEM program, she was able to get hands‐on experience with CAD and using power tools, as well as experience developing a concept project to propose to the community.Another influential factor in her decision to pursue STEM comes from her father’s work as an electrical engineer. These influences led her to conduct this study to ensure more women have access to outreach programs and chose to pursue STEM careers. 4 Research Question and Objectives Research question: What influences more women
a greater percentage than working engineers.As to persistence in engineering, a number of studies [1], [2], [4], [5], [14] found that students’abilities, perception of abilities, especially in mathematics play a big part. Another largecontributing factor to persistence is student aspirations and how well the discipline – or moreaccurately, their perception of the discipline – lines up with their career aspirations and personalinterest. To improve retention, engineering programs need to ensure that students recognize howtheir career aspirations and personal interests align with their chosen field early in their studies.Toward this end, an accurate picture of student interest is needed.Study PopulationThe authors teach an introductory course
ranks are solely based on voluntary student reports. http://www.studentsreview.com/• Forbes publishes America's Best Colleges based on variables such as student satisfaction, post-graduate employment success, the likelihood of graduation from college within four years, the estimated average four-year student loan debt, student and faculty success in winning national and international awards. They refer to both affordability and productivity criteria. http://www.forbes.com/lists/2009/94/colleges-09_Americas-Best-Colleges_Rank.html• The Global Universities Ranking seems to be a newly emerging and rudimentary attempt at ranking based on self-reported data. It does, however seek to include information from Russia, CIS and Baltic country
importance of traditionallearning pedagogies combined with experiential learning has been shown to increase overallcognitive competency [7] - [9]. To maintain relevancy and competitiveness in engineeringeducation, hands-on learning experiences with a global perspective needs to be integrated intothe curriculum [10], [11]. We believe critical skills such as empathizing, weighing ethicalconsiderations and effective communication are needed by graduates to navigate the 21st centuryglobal societal needs [12] - [17]. These learning opportunities could allow them to learn andpractice empathetical and ethical decision making with people from diverse backgrounds.Central to this capability is to provide the students with experiential learning opportunities
Formative Feedback CoachingIntroductionFaculty development, as it relates to teaching and learning, has been a persistent challenge inhigher education. College faculty generally begin their careers with no formal training in teach-ing and, consequently, ‘teach as I was taught’ is the starting point for most new faculty. Respon-sibility for faculty development of teaching, therefore, falls to an administrative unit of theuniversity. Many institutions have successful faculty orientation and mentoring programs, butthose programs often fall short of moving new teachers to effective practice in engagement peda-gogy using active learning strategies. Modifying the practices of experienced faculty is particu-larly difficult.This paper explores how faculty
) learning objectives were met, and how. In doing so, studentswere engaging with competency development, creating a framework within which they couldorganize understanding of their emerging competency over time. Further, connecting programlearning goals and general education (or ABET) requirements provides a framework forinterdisciplinary collaboration and allows administrators to streamline institutional assessment(e.g. ABET accreditation visits) using evidence collected in department-based ePortfolios.If students are not aware of their developing competency, many opportunities for learning,personal development, and professional identity development may be lost [28]. Conversely,taking an approach where students can explore, and are made explicitly
students9) How important is it to you to fit in with other students in your engineering-related courses? Possible probes: male students, female students, other students in your engineering program, other engineering studentsChoice of Major and Career Goals10) Do you have any plans to change your major? If so, please describe them for me.11) At this point, what kind of work do you see yourself doing after you graduate?12) At this point, how important is it to you to have a career as an engineer after you graduate?Gender-Related Issues13) Please describe for me what it has been like for you, being a woman in your engineering program.14) How much does being a woman contribute to how you see yourself as a person?15) How important is
variety of workingenvironments, mostly within England but with a significant number working in other countries.In program documentation, the advantages of placement are celebrated and attempts to quantifythe learning outcomes achieved have been made. However, because of the wide variety ofgeographical and cultural locations, work environments and the faculty lack of day to daycontrol once a student has been placed, it is difficult to write these learning outcomes from anevidence base.In this paper a qualitative approach has been used to illuminate the academic, personal andprofessional development of students resulting from the placement experience, based on theanalysis of semi-structured student interview data. This paper reports upon the
, function to privilege and perpetuate certainunderstandings of the field. Autoethnographic techniques are used to construct three accounts ofthe student’s encounters with an upper level administrator, various members of faculty, and anacademic advisor. Critical analysis of these experiences using a prior evidence-based model ofstories ‘told’ about engineering in the public discourse reveals tensions between the freshmanstudent’s values and career interests and the emergent, dominant discourse he observed in hisundergraduate program. These tensions are described in terms of: i) The prioritization of nationaleconomic recovery and growth over the life and career goals of individuals; ii) A predominantfocus on the quantitative and technical aspects of
2.7Table 1. Example of a decision matrix used to evaluate three design options. If a higher rating is better, Option 3 is the best option for the client chosen criteria and relative weights.As faculty, we encourage the students to explore innovative options in addition to the traditionaloptions for this important design decision. For example, the traditional structural materials forbuildings and bridges are concrete, steel, masonry, and timber. Over the last few years, ourstudents have also explored recycled plastics, structural insulated panels (SIPs), insulatingconcrete forms (ICFs), and autoclaved aerated concrete. It would be easy for students to let theexcitement of a novel solution to the problem drive them to choose the innovation
(VIP) Program is an engineering educationprogram that operates in a research and development context. Undergraduate students that joinVIP teams earn academic credit for their participation in design efforts that assist faculty andgraduate students with research and development issues in their areas of technical expertise. Theteams are: multidisciplinary – drawing students from across engineering; vertically-integrated –maintaining a mix of sophomores through PhD students each semester; and long-term – eachundergraduate student may participate in a project for up to seven semesters and each graduatestudent may participate for the duration of their graduate career. The continuity, technical depth,and disciplinary breadth of these teams enable
shortcomings of this construct is that it only provides a glimpse of student‟s plans upto three years into the future. It does not capture the fine-grained complexities that oftenaccompany career decision-making, e.g., the plan to use an engineering job as a stepping stone toa non-engineering job, or the decision to pursue a non-engineering job before eventuallyreturning to engineering. The APPLE survey addressed this issue by asking participants howlikely it was that they would do each of the following after graduation: work in an engineeringjob, working in a non-engineering job, go to graduate school in an engineering discipline, and goto graduate school in a non-engineering discipline1.Table 7: Professional Persistence by GroupGroup Number Group
the market. The CUICAR faculty provides support through mentoringrather than defining a design problem statement.•Concept Ideation. The development of a vehicle prototype, which should be marketcompetitive, is an open-ended design problem that challenges students to explore and arriveat different design alternatives at both the vehicle system and component level. DOstudents learn in an order opposite to that of traditional education approaches, wherestudents search for answers, derive conclusions, make decisions, and justify designselections within managerial, social, economic, and engineering constraints. At this phaseof the DO program, students are divided into teams, including but not limited to majorvehicle subsystems such as powertrain
' perspectivesAbstractThere is a mismatch or gap between the job-related skills that industrial companies want fromElectrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) graduates and what academic institutions providewhen students graduate from ECE programs. Consequently, and based on the literature, thenumber of contemporary graduates that lack the industry-required skills has increased. Becauseof the skills gap, newly hired engineers may require additional training to attain criticalcompetencies, which cost employers time and money.This paper examines the skills required by ECE graduates in the United States and presentssurvey results from ECE professional engineers. The survey used in this study was obtained fromThe College and Career Readiness and Success Center at the U.S
faculty member. These results suggested that the closer ineducational background a supplemental instructor was to the student, the more comfortable thestudent felt using that person as a resource. Results from last year’s survey also indicated thatstudents felt being able to explain the material well was the most important quality for a tutor to Page 24.323.3have, with the depth of understanding as the second most important quality. The least importantquality reported by both male and female students before and after taking the course wasempathy. Availability and friendliness, both before and after taking the course, had similarlevels of
analysis, it is a judgmentdecision on maturity, based on a collection of factors that support an informed decision on thepotential success of an applicant. These many career oriented factors are typically not availablewhen assessing the Master’s applicant who has just completed their undergraduate degree.A 2013 study of professional working adult learners1 shares the quantitative results of alongitudinal study of nearly 400 working professional adult learners, from business and industry,who graduated from a tier 1 research university series of programs designed and developed forprofessional learners. This cohort-based set of programs employs a hybrid classroom anddistance-supported, innovatively-delivered graduate degree (MS) in technology
Paper ID #37742Addressing the Needs of Hispanic/Latino(a) Students with the FlippedClassroom ModelDr. Alberto Cureg Cruz, California State University, Bakersfield Dr. Cruz is an Associate Professor of Computer Science, Principal Investigator of the Computer Per- ception Laboratory (COMPLAB), and board member of the Center for Environmental Studies (CES) at the California State University, Bakersfield (CSUB). He received a few grants from the National Science foundation and local agencies to support work in applied machine learning and engineering education.Dr. Amin Malek, California State University, Bakersfield Professor
. Isabelalso often expressed that she wanted to get along with their group members, and Isabel hopedthat her group members (all white students) had best intentions. Isabel noted that addressingmarginalizing behaviors done by peers is out of her control, but she felt that she controls herability to study and remain focused on her end-goal of graduating with an engineering degree.Isabel believed that the deficit perspectives of Black and Brown students were part of everydaylife, something that they would need to get used to while at college, and especially throughouttheir career. Our theme of “Marginalization is just part of Life” also aligned with findingsreported by Wolfe et al. [10]. For example, in Wolfe et al.’s work, exclusion based on race
Paper ID #28775A Coding Scheme for Measuring Biomedical Engineering Students’ Breadthof Exposure to the DisciplineProf. Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Heidi A. Diefes-Dux is a Professor in Biological Systems Engineering at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. She received her B.S. and M.S. in Food Science from Cornell University and her Ph.D. in Food Process Engineering from the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Purdue University. She was an inaugural faculty member of the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses on the development
report that, after the engineering students participated in theprogram, “nearly all of them now expressed interest in becoming educators at some point in theircareers.”10 It is encouraging to see engineers acquire an interest in potentially pursuing K-12teaching as a future career path.Research QuestionsThis research explores how students integrate an ardent interest in pursuing two seeminglydissimilar careers—in engineering and teaching—and how they envision using engineering,teaching, or both, in their futures. Given the diverse student experience inherent in this degreeprogram built around the passion to become “more than an engineer,” this paper addresses twoprimary research questions:1. How do engineering knowledge and teaching knowledge
-year engineering students and non-engineering majors in the engineering design process. 3. To introduce students to the role and impact of engineering in society. 4. To begin instilling a critical view of information sources impacting engineering analyses and decision making. 5. To begin developing an understanding of potential for conflicting personal, organizational and social values in engineering decision making.As originally conceived, the course learning outcomes (referring to understanding and abilitiesappropriate for first-year, post-secondary students) were: 1. Students will demonstrate an understanding of and an ability to use the engineering design process. 2. Students will
undergraduate assimilated knowledge throughsuccessfully greater career opportunities, recommendations from supervisors and third partiesand the potential students statement of purpose. In the final analysis, it is a judgment decision onmaturity, based on a collection of factors that support an informed decision on the potentialsuccess of an applicant. These many career oriented factors are typically not available whenassessing the Master’s applicant who has just completed their undergraduate degree.This paper shares the quantitative results of a longitudinal study of nearly 400 workingprofessional adult learners, from business and industry, who graduated from Purdue University’sCenter for Professional Studies in Technology and Applied Research (ProSTAR
’ cognitive, personal, and professional development.” Science Education 91: 36-74.7. Guterman, L. (2007). What Good is Undergraduate Research, Anyway? The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(50) A12.8. Nagda, B. A., S. R. Gregerman, J. Jonides, W. von Hippel, and J.S. Lerner. (1998). “Undergraduate student- faculty research partnerships affect student retention.” The Review of Higher Education 22: 55-72.9. Hathaway, R., B.A. Nagda, and S. Gregerman. (2002). “The relationship of undergraduate research participation to graduate and professional education pursuit: An empirical study.” Journal of College Student Development 43(5): 614-631.10. Kremmer, J.F. and R.G. Bringle, (2000). “The Effects of an Intensive Research Experience on
student learning and success, and the impact of a flexible classroom space on faculty teaching and student learning. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students.Trevion S. Henderson, University of Michigan Trevion Henderson is a doctoral student in the Center for Higher and Postsecondary Education (CSHPE) at the University of Michigan. He recently earned his master’s degree in Higher Education and Student Affairs at The Ohio State University while serving as a graduate research associate with the Center for Higher Education Enterprise. Trevion also hold’s a Bachelor’s degree in
, entrepreneurship, and modeling. She has served as an associate editor for the JEE and is currently associate editor for the AEE Journal.Rosa Goldstein , University of Pittsburgh Rosa Goldstein is an Undergraduate Industrial Engineering student at the University of Pittsburgh. Ms. Goldstein has been an active member of the University of Pittsburgh’s SHPE (Society of Hispanic Pro- fessional Engineers) chapter and currently holds the position as President. She recently studied abroad for a semester in Spain at Saint Louis University in Madrid. She will be starting her career this summer at Accenture and is hoping that her research experience this past year will reinforce her plans to attend graduate school in a few years