Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 1171 - 1200 of 3591 in total
Conference Session
MVCC Technical Session
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
George York, U.S. Air Force Academy; Jeffrey Butler, U.S. Air Force Academy; Timothy Hyer, US Air Force
Tagged Divisions
Military and Veterans Constituent Committee
Paper ID #14767Motivating Students with an Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Airmanshipand Research ProgramDr. George York, U.S. Air Force Academy George York, PhD, PE, is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the United States Air Force Academy, CO, and is currently the Director of the Academy Center for UAS Research. He received his PhD in Electrical Engineering from the University of Washington. His research interests include the cooperative control of intelligent systems, digital signal processing, and embedded computer systems. He is a Senior Member IEEE.Col. Jeffrey Butler, U.S. Air Force Academy
Conference Session
NSF Grantees: Student Development
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Lily Krest, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Justin Charles Major, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Matthew Scheidt, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Julianna Ge, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; John Chen P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; James M. Widmann, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Edward J. Berger, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
affective factors vary among college undergraduates?,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education 2019 Pacific Southwest Meeting, 2019, pp. 1–13.[19] C. Striolo, M. Pollock, and A. Godwin, “Staying or leaving: contributing factors for U.K. engineering studentsdecisions to pursue careers in engineering industry,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., pp. 1–25, Jan. 2020.[20] T. Humphries-Smith and C. Hunt, “An exploration of progression rates of widening participation students on to an integrated master of engineering,” Int. J. High. Educ., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 69–78, 2017.[21] “Fixing the foundations: Creating a more prosperous nation.”[22] M. Scheidt, R. Senkpeil, J. Chen, A. Godwin, and E. Berger
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Manuel A. Jimenez, University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez; Luisa Guillemard, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez ; Aidsa I. Santiago-Roman, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez ; Oscar Marcelo Suarez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez ; Nayda G. Santiago P.E., University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez ; Carla Lopez Del Puerto, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez ; Pedro O. Quintero; Anidza Valentin, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez ; Nelson Cardona-Martinez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez ; Sonia M. Bartolomei-Suarez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
outcome-based educational framework. She has also incorporated theories on social cognitive career choices and student attrition mitigation to investigate the effectiveness of institutional interventions in increasing the retention and academic success of talented engineering students from economically disadvantaged families. She’s also involved in a project that explores the relationship between the institutional policies at UPRM and faculty and graduate students’ motivation to create good relationships between advisors and advisees.Prof. Oscar Marcelo Suarez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Professor Oscar Marcelo Suarez joined the University of Puerto Rico - Mayaguez in 2000. He holds a BS in Aeronautical &
Conference Session
Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 16
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Kathryn Schulte Grahame, Northeastern University; Christos Zahopoulos, Northeastern University; Rajini Jesudason, Northeastern University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education
ofchange -- (See Appendix A). The logic model illustrates the logical relationship among programinputs (such as the grant funds and faculty expertise), activities (such as the introductoryengineering design course) and desired outputs (such as numbers of participating students) andoutcomes (such as increases in student interest in clean energy careers). This logic model wasused to inform the program design, including activities with students. In addition, the logicmodel was used to frame measures of success. This paper will describe our efforts, examine themeasurements of our goals, and discuss lessons learned over the three iterations of our program.BackgroundThree different cohorts of students participated in the program between 2013-18. Each
Conference Session
ET Pedagogy III
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Sonia Travaglini, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
., teaching but not tenured or tenure-line) currently listed on the departmentalwebsite, none are women. Similarly, in Bioengineering, none of the non-faculty teaching stafflisted on the website are female. This can lead to a delegitimizing of the academic purpose andauthority of SEEFs due to unintended gender bias, and less emphasis on the organizationalculture capital (the shared sense of identity, norms, values and trust) and role models needed forundergraduate students to develop an engineering identity. This includes students seeingthemselves as a future educators or in an academic role such as a faculty member, which is a keyaspect of supporting diversity within the undergraduate population [36], with 41 percent of the1,525 students within the
Conference Session
Technical Session 10 - Paper 3: Bridging the STEM Gender Gap through Women-focused Outreach
Collection
2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity)
Authors
Isabel A Boyd, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Anne Skutnik, Tickle College of Engineering Academic and Student Affairs, University of Tennessee Knoxville ; Jalonda Nakay Thompson, University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Marcel Brouwers, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
 about each of the fields of engineering, as well as connect with students and staff members in those departments.Throughout her high school’s 3 course STEM program, she was able to get hands‐on experience with CAD and using power tools, as well as experience developing a concept project to propose to the community.Another influential factor in her decision to pursue STEM comes from her father’s work as an electrical engineer. These influences led her to conduct this study to ensure more women have access to outreach programs and chose to pursue STEM careers. 4 Research Question and Objectives Research question: What influences more women
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Major Choice
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
J.w. Bruce, Tennessee Technological University; Mahnas Jean Mohammadi-Aragh, Mississippi State University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
a greater percentage than working engineers.As to persistence in engineering, a number of studies [1], [2], [4], [5], [14] found that students’abilities, perception of abilities, especially in mathematics play a big part. Another largecontributing factor to persistence is student aspirations and how well the discipline – or moreaccurately, their perception of the discipline – lines up with their career aspirations and personalinterest. To improve retention, engineering programs need to ensure that students recognize howtheir career aspirations and personal interests align with their chosen field early in their studies.Toward this end, an accurate picture of student interest is needed.Study PopulationThe authors teach an introductory course
Conference Session
Modeling Student Data
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael Dyrenfurth, Purdue University; Mike Murphy, Dublin Institute of Technology; Gary Bertoline, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
ranks are solely based on voluntary student reports.  http://www.studentsreview.com/• Forbes publishes America's Best Colleges based on variables such as student satisfaction, post-graduate employment success, the likelihood of graduation from college within four years, the estimated average four-year student loan debt, student and faculty success in winning national and international awards. They refer to both affordability and productivity criteria.  http://www.forbes.com/lists/2009/94/colleges-09_Americas-Best-Colleges_Rank.html• The Global Universities Ranking seems to be a newly emerging and rudimentary attempt at ranking based on self-reported data. It does, however seek to include information from Russia, CIS and Baltic country
Conference Session
Integrating Experiential Learning into the Curriculum
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mark J. Povinelli, Syracuse University; Jonnell A. Robinson, Syracuse University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Cooperative and Experiential Education
importance of traditionallearning pedagogies combined with experiential learning has been shown to increase overallcognitive competency [7] - [9]. To maintain relevancy and competitiveness in engineeringeducation, hands-on learning experiences with a global perspective needs to be integrated intothe curriculum [10], [11]. We believe critical skills such as empathizing, weighing ethicalconsiderations and effective communication are needed by graduates to navigate the 21st centuryglobal societal needs [12] - [17]. These learning opportunities could allow them to learn andpractice empathetical and ethical decision making with people from diverse backgrounds.Central to this capability is to provide the students with experiential learning opportunities
Conference Session
Supporting Faculty in Course Development and Pedagogy
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kara L. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University; Lindy Hamilton Mayled, Arizona State University; Eugene Judson, Arizona State University; Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; Robert J. Culbertson; James A. Middleton, Arizona State University; Casey Jane Ankeny, Northwestern University; Ying-Chih Chen, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Continuing Professional Development
Formative Feedback CoachingIntroductionFaculty development, as it relates to teaching and learning, has been a persistent challenge inhigher education. College faculty generally begin their careers with no formal training in teach-ing and, consequently, ‘teach as I was taught’ is the starting point for most new faculty. Respon-sibility for faculty development of teaching, therefore, falls to an administrative unit of theuniversity. Many institutions have successful faculty orientation and mentoring programs, butthose programs often fall short of moving new teachers to effective practice in engagement peda-gogy using active learning strategies. Modifying the practices of experienced faculty is particu-larly difficult.This paper explores how faculty
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Technical Session: Pedagogy II - Best Teaching Practices
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Taylor Tucker, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Esmee Vernooij, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Catherine LaBore, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ; Ava R. Wolf, Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning; Cheelan Bo-Linn, Center for Innovation in Teaching & Learning, University of Illinois; Robert Thomas Baird; Nattasit Dancholvichit, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Leon Liebenberg, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
) learning objectives were met, and how. In doing so, studentswere engaging with competency development, creating a framework within which they couldorganize understanding of their emerging competency over time. Further, connecting programlearning goals and general education (or ABET) requirements provides a framework forinterdisciplinary collaboration and allows administrators to streamline institutional assessment(e.g. ABET accreditation visits) using evidence collected in department-based ePortfolios.If students are not aware of their developing competency, many opportunities for learning,personal development, and professional identity development may be lost [28]. Conversely,taking an approach where students can explore, and are made explicitly
Conference Session
Undergraduate Student Issues: Culture
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech; Courtney S Smith-Orr, Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
students9) How important is it to you to fit in with other students in your engineering-related courses?  Possible probes: male students, female students, other students in your engineering program, other engineering studentsChoice of Major and Career Goals10) Do you have any plans to change your major? If so, please describe them for me.11) At this point, what kind of work do you see yourself doing after you graduate?12) At this point, how important is it to you to have a career as an engineer after you graduate?Gender-Related Issues13) Please describe for me what it has been like for you, being a woman in your engineering program.14) How much does being a woman contribute to how you see yourself as a person?15) How important is
Conference Session
Assessment & Quality Accredition in Engineering Education
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
John Rowe; Tim Mulroy
variety of workingenvironments, mostly within England but with a significant number working in other countries.In program documentation, the advantages of placement are celebrated and attempts to quantifythe learning outcomes achieved have been made. However, because of the wide variety ofgeographical and cultural locations, work environments and the faculty lack of day to daycontrol once a student has been placed, it is difficult to write these learning outcomes from anevidence base.In this paper a qualitative approach has been used to illuminate the academic, personal andprofessional development of students resulting from the placement experience, based on theanalysis of semi-structured student interview data. This paper reports upon the
Conference Session
Research on Diversification & Inclusion
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael Brewer, University of Georgia; Nicola Sochacka, University of Georgia; Joachim Walther, University of Georgia
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering
, function to privilege and perpetuate certainunderstandings of the field. Autoethnographic techniques are used to construct three accounts ofthe student’s encounters with an upper level administrator, various members of faculty, and anacademic advisor. Critical analysis of these experiences using a prior evidence-based model ofstories ‘told’ about engineering in the public discourse reveals tensions between the freshmanstudent’s values and career interests and the emergent, dominant discourse he observed in hisundergraduate program. These tensions are described in terms of: i) The prioritization of nationaleconomic recovery and growth over the life and career goals of individuals; ii) A predominantfocus on the quantitative and technical aspects of
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship Courses and Outcomes II
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
William D. Schindel, ICTT System Sciences; Samuel N. Peffers, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; James H. Hanson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Jameel Ahmed, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; William A. Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
2.7Table 1. Example of a decision matrix used to evaluate three design options. If a higher rating is better, Option 3 is the best option for the client chosen criteria and relative weights.As faculty, we encourage the students to explore innovative options in addition to the traditionaloptions for this important design decision. For example, the traditional structural materials forbuildings and bridges are concrete, steel, masonry, and timber. Over the last few years, ourstudents have also explored recycled plastics, structural insulated panels (SIPs), insulatingconcrete forms (ICFs), and autoclaved aerated concrete. It would be easy for students to let theexcitement of a novel solution to the problem drive them to choose the innovation
Conference Session
Integrating Research Into Undergraduate ECE Education
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jan Allebach, Purdue University; Edward Coyle, Purdue University; Joy Krueger, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
(VIP) Program is an engineering educationprogram that operates in a research and development context. Undergraduate students that joinVIP teams earn academic credit for their participation in design efforts that assist faculty andgraduate students with research and development issues in their areas of technical expertise. Theteams are: multidisciplinary – drawing students from across engineering; vertically-integrated –maintaining a mix of sophomores through PhD students each semester; and long-term – eachundergraduate student may participate in a project for up to seven semesters and each graduatestudent may participate for the duration of their graduate career. The continuity, technical depth,and disciplinary breadth of these teams enable
Conference Session
Understanding Our Students
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Ozgur Eris, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
shortcomings of this construct is that it only provides a glimpse of student‟s plans upto three years into the future. It does not capture the fine-grained complexities that oftenaccompany career decision-making, e.g., the plan to use an engineering job as a stepping stone toa non-engineering job, or the decision to pursue a non-engineering job before eventuallyreturning to engineering. The APPLE survey addressed this issue by asking participants howlikely it was that they would do each of the following after graduation: work in an engineeringjob, working in a non-engineering job, go to graduate school in an engineering discipline, and goto graduate school in a non-engineering discipline1.Table 7: Professional Persistence by GroupGroup Number Group
Conference Session
College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David Schmueser Ph.D., Clemson University; Johnell Brooks, Clemson University; Shayne Kelly McConomy, Clemson University; Pierluigi Pisu, Clemson University; Andrej Ivanco; Robert Gary Prucka, Clemson University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
College Industry Partnerships
the market. The CUICAR faculty provides support through mentoringrather than defining a design problem statement.•Concept Ideation. The development of a vehicle prototype, which should be marketcompetitive, is an open-ended design problem that challenges students to explore and arriveat different design alternatives at both the vehicle system and component level. DOstudents learn in an order opposite to that of traditional education approaches, wherestudents search for answers, derive conclusions, make decisions, and justify designselections within managerial, social, economic, and engineering constraints. At this phaseof the DO program, students are divided into teams, including but not limited to majorvehicle subsystems such as powertrain
Conference Session
Electrical and Computer Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mohammad Al Mestiraihi, Utah State University; Kurt Becker, Utah State University - Engineering Education
' perspectivesAbstractThere is a mismatch or gap between the job-related skills that industrial companies want fromElectrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) graduates and what academic institutions providewhen students graduate from ECE programs. Consequently, and based on the literature, thenumber of contemporary graduates that lack the industry-required skills has increased. Becauseof the skills gap, newly hired engineers may require additional training to attain criticalcompetencies, which cost employers time and money.This paper examines the skills required by ECE graduates in the United States and presentssurvey results from ECE professional engineers. The survey used in this study was obtained fromThe College and Career Readiness and Success Center at the U.S
Conference Session
WIED: Curricular Undergraduate Student Programs
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kristen B. Coletti, Northeastern University; Emily Olina Wisniewski; Rachel Lauren Shapiro, Northeastern University; Paul A. DiMilla, Northeastern University; Rachelle Reisberg, Northeastern University; Melinda Covert, Northeastern University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
faculty member. These results suggested that the closer ineducational background a supplemental instructor was to the student, the more comfortable thestudent felt using that person as a resource. Results from last year’s survey also indicated thatstudents felt being able to explain the material well was the most important quality for a tutor to Page 24.323.3have, with the depth of understanding as the second most important quality. The least importantquality reported by both male and female students before and after taking the course wasempathy. Availability and friendliness, both before and after taking the course, had similarlevels of
Conference Session
The Intersection of Higher Ed and Industry
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mitchell L. Springer PMP, SPHR, Purdue University - West Lafayette; Mark T. Schuver, Purdue University - West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Continuing Professional Development
analysis, it is a judgmentdecision on maturity, based on a collection of factors that support an informed decision on thepotential success of an applicant. These many career oriented factors are typically not availablewhen assessing the Master’s applicant who has just completed their undergraduate degree.A 2013 study of professional working adult learners1 shares the quantitative results of alongitudinal study of nearly 400 working professional adult learners, from business and industry,who graduated from a tier 1 research university series of programs designed and developed forprofessional learners. This cohort-based set of programs employs a hybrid classroom anddistance-supported, innovatively-delivered graduate degree (MS) in technology
Conference Session
Supporting Underrepresented and LGBTQ Students
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alberto Cureg Cruz, California State University, Bakersfield; Amin Malek, California State University, Bakersfield; Andrea Medina, California State University, Bakersfield; Melissa Danforth, California State University, Bakersfield
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
Paper ID #37742Addressing the Needs of Hispanic/Latino(a) Students with the FlippedClassroom ModelDr. Alberto Cureg Cruz, California State University, Bakersfield Dr. Cruz is an Associate Professor of Computer Science, Principal Investigator of the Computer Per- ception Laboratory (COMPLAB), and board member of the Center for Environmental Studies (CES) at the California State University, Bakersfield (CSUB). He received a few grants from the National Science foundation and local agencies to support work in applied machine learning and engineering education.Dr. Amin Malek, California State University, Bakersfield Professor
Conference Session
LEES 2: Stories of Intersectionality and Institutional Marginalization
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Janelle Grant; Stephanie Masta, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Darryl Dickerson, Florida International University; Alice Pawley, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Matthew Ohland, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)
. Isabelalso often expressed that she wanted to get along with their group members, and Isabel hopedthat her group members (all white students) had best intentions. Isabel noted that addressingmarginalizing behaviors done by peers is out of her control, but she felt that she controls herability to study and remain focused on her end-goal of graduating with an engineering degree.Isabel believed that the deficit perspectives of Black and Brown students were part of everydaylife, something that they would need to get used to while at college, and especially throughouttheir career. Our theme of “Marginalization is just part of Life” also aligned with findingsreported by Wolfe et al. [10]. For example, in Wolfe et al.’s work, exclusion based on race
Conference Session
Introduction to the Field of Biomedical Engineering - June 25th
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Nicole M. Iverson, University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering
Paper ID #28775A Coding Scheme for Measuring Biomedical Engineering Students’ Breadthof Exposure to the DisciplineProf. Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Heidi A. Diefes-Dux is a Professor in Biological Systems Engineering at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. She received her B.S. and M.S. in Food Science from Cornell University and her Ph.D. in Food Process Engineering from the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Purdue University. She was an inaugural faculty member of the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses on the development
Conference Session
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Research-to-Practice: Principles of K-12 Engineering Education and Practice
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Malinda S. Zarske, University of Colorado - Boulder; Maia Lisa Vadeen, University of Colorado - Boulder; Janet Y. Tsai, University of Colorado - Boulder; Jacquelyn F. Sullivan Ph.D. , University of Colorado - Boulder; Denise W. Carlson, University of Colorado - Boulder
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division
report that, after the engineering students participated in theprogram, “nearly all of them now expressed interest in becoming educators at some point in theircareers.”10 It is encouraging to see engineers acquire an interest in potentially pursuing K-12teaching as a future career path.Research QuestionsThis research explores how students integrate an ardent interest in pursuing two seeminglydissimilar careers—in engineering and teaching—and how they envision using engineering,teaching, or both, in their futures. Given the diverse student experience inherent in this degreeprogram built around the passion to become “more than an engineer,” this paper addresses twoprimary research questions:1. How do engineering knowledge and teaching knowledge
Conference Session
FPD IV: Innovative Curriculum Elements of Successful First-year Courses
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John C. Moosbrugger, Clarkson University; Jan DeWaters, Clarkson University; Melissa Carole Richards, Clarkson University; Elisabeth A. Chapman, Clarkson University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
-year engineering students and non-engineering majors in the engineering design process. 3. To introduce students to the role and impact of engineering in society. 4. To begin instilling a critical view of information sources impacting engineering analyses and decision making. 5. To begin developing an understanding of potential for conflicting personal, organizational and social values in engineering decision making.As originally conceived, the course learning outcomes (referring to understanding and abilitiesappropriate for first-year, post-secondary students) were: 1. Students will demonstrate an understanding of and an ability to use the engineering design process. 2. Students will
Conference Session
Faculty and Course Evolution: Teaching With Technology, Online Delivery, and Addressing Emerging Student & Industry Needs
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mitchell L Springer PMP, SPHR, SHRM-SCP, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Mark T Schuver, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Continuing Professional Development
undergraduate assimilated knowledge throughsuccessfully greater career opportunities, recommendations from supervisors and third partiesand the potential students statement of purpose. In the final analysis, it is a judgment decision onmaturity, based on a collection of factors that support an informed decision on the potentialsuccess of an applicant. These many career oriented factors are typically not available whenassessing the Master’s applicant who has just completed their undergraduate degree.This paper shares the quantitative results of a longitudinal study of nearly 400 workingprofessional adult learners, from business and industry, who graduated from Purdue University’sCenter for Professional Studies in Technology and Applied Research (ProSTAR
Conference Session
Cultivating Engineering Scholarship and Research Mindsets Among URM Students
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amelito G. Enriquez, Canada College; Wenshen Pong P.E., San Francisco State University; Hamid Shahnasser, San Francisco State University; Hamid Mahmoodi, San Francisco State University; Cheng Chen, San Francisco State University; Xiaorong Zhang, San Francisco State University; Kwok Siong Teh, San Francisco State University; Nicholas Langhoff, Canada College
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
’ cognitive, personal, and professional development.” Science Education 91: 36-74.7. Guterman, L. (2007). What Good is Undergraduate Research, Anyway? The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(50) A12.8. Nagda, B. A., S. R. Gregerman, J. Jonides, W. von Hippel, and J.S. Lerner. (1998). “Undergraduate student- faculty research partnerships affect student retention.” The Review of Higher Education 22: 55-72.9. Hathaway, R., B.A. Nagda, and S. Gregerman. (2002). “The relationship of undergraduate research participation to graduate and professional education pursuit: An empirical study.” Journal of College Student Development 43(5): 614-631.10. Kremmer, J.F. and R.G. Bringle, (2000). “The Effects of an Intensive Research Experience on
Conference Session
ERM Technical Session 10: Understanding Student Experiences
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Emma Brennan-Wydra, University of Michigan; Joanna Mirecki Millunchick, University of Michigan; Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan; Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan; Trevion S. Henderson, University of Michigan
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
student learning and success, and the impact of a flexible classroom space on faculty teaching and student learning. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students.Trevion S. Henderson, University of Michigan Trevion Henderson is a doctoral student in the Center for Higher and Postsecondary Education (CSHPE) at the University of Michigan. He recently earned his master’s degree in Higher Education and Student Affairs at The Ohio State University while serving as a graduate research associate with the Center for Higher Education Enterprise. Trevion also hold’s a Bachelor’s degree in
Conference Session
Open-Ended Problems and Student Learning
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nora Siewiorek, University of Pittsburgh; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Rosa Goldstein, University of Pittsburgh
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
, entrepreneurship, and modeling. She has served as an associate editor for the JEE and is currently associate editor for the AEE Journal.Rosa Goldstein , University of Pittsburgh Rosa Goldstein is an Undergraduate Industrial Engineering student at the University of Pittsburgh. Ms. Goldstein has been an active member of the University of Pittsburgh’s SHPE (Society of Hispanic Pro- fessional Engineers) chapter and currently holds the position as President. She recently studied abroad for a semester in Spain at Saint Louis University in Madrid. She will be starting her career this summer at Accenture and is hoping that her research experience this past year will reinforce her plans to attend graduate school in a few years