Foundation (NSF) for supporting this project: A SynergisticApproach to Prevent Persistent Misconceptions with First-year Engineering Students (EEC-1232761). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.Reference1. Prince, M., Vigeant, M., & Nottis, K. Assessing misconceptions of undergraduate engineeringstudents in the thermal sciences. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2010, 26(4),880-890.2. Yang, D., Streveler, R. A., &Miller, R. L. Can instruction reinforce misconceptions?Preliminary evidence from a study with advanced engineering students. Paper presented at theAnnual Meeting of the American Educational
understand the QM role from the Quality Manager’sperspective and thereby further refine the position. The questions asked were aimed at Page 23.1248.8understanding the degree to which QMs become a “skilled other” in this peer-scaffoldingprogram. Being a Quality Manager is an invitation to be a part of an intricate learning process. Our surveyand analysis of this process depicts the Quality Manager position as one containing four broadstages. These stages include Stage 1) Sign-up and Selection, Stage 2) Orientation andPreparation, Stage 3) Lab/class Time, and Stage 4) After-class Time and Reflection. Thefollowing section is a
design and conduct experiments (ABET student outcome [b]), and 3) theability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (ABET student outcome [e]). It isimportant that engineering faculty of all disciplines continuously push the envelope and work toelevate student learning and comprehension so that they can apply the fundamental concepts inengineering design and decision making. The existence of various learning styles has also been well documented and multipleclassification systems have been developed. For example, the Felder-Silverman model7separates learning styles into four dichotomous categories: student learning can be 1) sensory orintuitive, 2) visual or verbal, 3) active or reflective, and 4) sequential or global
engineering education in theK-12 and college settings. He is particularly interested in howstudents and teachers engage in and reflect upon the engineering designprocess. His research includes investigating how teachers conceptualizeand teach and how students engage in engineering through in- depth case study analysis.Dr. Ethan E Danahy, Tufts University Ethan Danahy is a Research Assistant Professor in the Department Computer Science at Tufts Univer- sity outside of Boston MA, having received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in Computer Science in 2000 and 2002, respectively, and a Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering in 2007, all from Tufts. Additionally, he acts as the Engineering Research Program Director at the Center for
required students to reflect on ConstructionMethods Learned, Leadership Skills and Management Methods Learned, and Safety Methodsand Requirements Learned. The reports could be filled out during the lab activities to allowstudents to document learning lessons in real time. Further, students were required to use theiriPad mobile device to take photos of the days activities and attach them to the daily reports.Concerns in the implementation of the use of mobile technologies included the technical abilityof the students and the durability of the iPad in a construction environment. From a technicalability standpoint, most of the students were able to use the iPad and applications withoutsignificant problems. It was found that some students were more
are able to propose validapproaches to measuring or estimating fluid mechanical behavior in physiological systems.Students will also be surveyed on the extent to which they feel they are able to evaluate differentengineering approaches before and after the course, and senior design instructors will be asked toassess students’ abilities to conduct proper analysis to make decisions based on thoroughevaluation, rather than trial and error, in their respective design projects. The developers of thelaboratory expect to see increased evaluation and synthesis skills of students following thecourse and hope this is reflected in their ability to make informed design decisions in theircapstone design course. [1] Splitt, F. G. “The Challenge to Change
reflection with thecoach who then provides follow up questions to guide students to think in a direction ofactionable steps and standardized approach towards their academic and professional goals.Step four is when establishing pull occurs. The principle of this lean manufacturing step is to setup a pull production system. It strengthens any system since it is necessary to produce only whatis necessary at the downstream step. It provides the final touch of reducing work-in-progress to amaximum. Now that KS-LSAMP Scholars have a standardized approach and actionable steps toachieving their goals, within this final meeting students are asked to return to their goals andevaluate if they have met their semester goals and/or steps towards their long-term
challenge traditionaluniversity experiences and feedback mechanisms, potentially depriving students of the practicalwisdom gained through these experiences [1]. These concerns reflect a general fear andconfusion surrounding the implications of ChatGPT in education, researchers have highlightedthe need to understand how students may use ChatGPT, as many will use it regardless of itsadoption by the instructor. To address the transformative effects of ChatGPT on the learningenvironment, it is crucial to educate both teachers and students about the capabilities andlimitations of the tool. Academic regulations and evaluation practices used in educationalinstitutions need to be updated to accommodate the use of ChatGPT and other AI tools.Educators should
Engineering Education, 2024 2024 ASEE Midwest Section ConferencePrevious work done to access AI literacy is also compared to note the progress of studentcomfort over the last four semesters. Notably, these student projects are conducted in anengineering education setting where programming fluency at the level required to create AI andML tools is not generally attained by the students using the tools. This is reflective of a wideadoption of AI and ML tools across various fields. The use of AI and ML resources arebecoming ubiquitous in many fields where programming fluency is not typically associated, suchas medicine [5,6] and business [7]. There is even some work exploring early adoption inprecollege education such as the
as itmeets project requirements. Many other courses follow this same practice, including the Intro toIE Data Visualization project, which was the first project included on students’ e-Portfoliosduring the first iteration of implementation, serving as a baseline for further e-Portfoliodevelopment considerations. It is key that students can publicly publish the links to their e-Portfolio websites, so academic integrity was a key consideration when discussing curriculuminclusion in the portfolios. This approach to project selection meets these conditions as outlinedby the CoE and the research team, and these conditions are reflected in the project selectionprocess previously outlined. Given that these projects are typically specific to a given
people from different culturessignificantly enhances intercultural competencies. It is important to note that this insight hasbeen developed from the perspective of undergraduate students. Students’ reflection on wherethey are currently will aid in the development of better educational practices for them. Moreover,this insight underscores the importance of creating educational environments that encouragediverse interactions. Such environments allow students to engage with and learn from individualswith different perspectives, ultimately preparing them for the global workforce. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 2024 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceReferences[1] “Criteria for
motivate studentsto design game software products and use software engineering techniques to solve real-worldprogramming problems. The investigators included small group activities with the expectationthat students would provide written or oral summaries (either live in-person or virtually usingvideo) of the strategies used to complete their tasks and their lessons learned. We encouragedstudents to reflect on the lessons learned from game design exercises either in writing or orallyfor in-person classes. We shifted to authentic assessment techniques and introduced the use ofmore frequent, lower stakes graded activities in both courses.Gamification was introduced in our revised courses as a means of promoting rewards forcompleting tasks. Students
summer bridge program and its impactson student success. First, we will assess our outreach efforts to recruit students for the Summer 6Bridge program by analyzing students’ demographic characteristics (e.g., socio-economic status,race, gender, current/prior high school) to understand how we serve underserved students. Wewill gather course-specific feedback for each summer bridge course including student grades,artifacts for student learning outcomes, course evaluation data, and formative student feedbackcollected by faculty throughout the course. Using surveys, focus groups, and/or interviews, wewill gather summative and reflective feedback from
housing needs • Students will begin to apply “money plan” to off campus housing student case study example • Students will create their own “money plan” emphasizing planning, tracking, and evaluating expensesSeminar 4: FAFSA & • Students will reflect on their fall semester experience and identifyScholarship specific successes and challenges.Application, • Students will identify strategies, habits, resources, or other factors that they believe supported success during fall semester.Review Retreat • Students will identify
. Questions for Discussion We hope that sharing our in-progress unit at the ASEE conference will createopportunities for us to share our unit design with others seeking to embed engineering designexperiences into required high school science courses. Acknowledgement This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. 2149782. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. References Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Malzahn, K. A., Plumley, C. L., Gordon, E. M., & Hayes, M
relying on western approaches of using Likert surveyswith large sample sizes to produce generalizable data sets.AcknowledgmentThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Research in theFormation of Engineers program under Grant Number 1916673. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. 6ReferencesCapobianco, B. M., DeLisi, J., & Radloff, J. (2018). Characterizing elementary teachers’ enactment of high‐leverage practices through engineering design‐based science
interviews, starting in week six of their co-opterm and concluding in the final, 16th week. The first interview asked them to reflect on the firstsix weeks of their term. Interviews two through nine had them reflect on the previous week’sevents, and any ongoing design issues that they worked on over several weeks that were still thefocus of their attention. In the final week, the participants were asked to reflect on their overallexperience of designing that term, and what they learned over their co-op. Altogether, thisresulted in a dataset of 772 minutes of transcribed interview data, with an average of 257 minutesof transcript per participant.The interview transcripts were analyzed using an iterative thematic analysis approach [22]. Thedataset was
Catia Biochemistry White Woman Russia Chaaya Chemistry Indian Woman United States Chloe Chemistry White Woman United StatesData CollectionThe data for this study is composed of thirty-two semi-structured interviews. Each participantwas interviewed once per year, typically in or immediately following the spring semester. Theinterviews generally lasted between forty-five minutes and one hour and followed a protocoldevised for the broader UKSA project. The protocol sought to capture a wide variety of thestudents’ perspectives on the prior academic year, including reflections on their assessments,preferred class
, including students, staff, faculty, and alumni • Develop a career plan, including a plan of study that will support that career plan • Develop an awareness of curricular and co-curricular opportunities • Build foundational skills for college success, including self-reflection, study skills, time management, and goal settingHistoric EffortsEngineering Orientation is a long-standing course at ONU, and has long sought to encouragestudents to engage with the college through co- and extra-curricular activities. Historically,students enrolled in engineering orientation were required to attend two professional societymeetings during the semester and report their attendance at these meetings to their faculty viaemail. However, anecdotal
tointegrate the software.Literature ReviewIntuition helps professionals make quick and accurate predictions and decisions. It has beendefined in many fields, but it has only recently been defined in engineering as “subconsciouslyleveraging experience to assess a present situation or predict a future outcome[1]. Intuitiondevelops in engineering learners and is often reflected in the speed, automaticity, andengagement of information when problem-solving. Humans have a visual intuition for materialsand structures we interact with on day-to-day basis and an intuition for shapes and materials thathelps to negate flawed designs[2]. Yet, construction and building engineering learners mustinteract with materials and structures from abehavioral design
significant increase from the 17.8% recorded in 2010[1]. However, this growth has not been reflected in the workplace. Between 2001 and 2019, thenumber of women engineers in the workforce only rose from about 10% to 14% [2]. Theunderrepresentation of women is particularly pronounced in mechanical, electrical, and computerengineering, with only 17.5%, 15.6%, and 20.4% of bachelor’s degrees in these fields awarded towomen [1]. Furthermore, women represent only 9%, 10%, and 12% of working engineers inthese respective fields [3].For underrepresented minorities, the statistics are even more dismal. Bachelor’s degrees inengineering awarded to Black or African American individuals have risen only slightly from4.5% in 2010 to 4.7% in 2021 [1]. Hispanics now
anticipated as manyfaculty members continued to expand and refine the resource well beyond the original timeline.In addition to the more reflective studies, there are multiple guides for aspiring OER authors andthose wishing to set up OER adoption and authorship programs at the institutional level. TheOER guide on authoring OER, Authoring Open Content [11], offers many solid advice toprospective OER authors. The resource covers far more than we can summarize here, but the listof ten tips for OER authors does reiterate some of the same lessons learned in the previouspapers. 10. Good authoring begins with planning 9. It’s going to take longer than you think 8. Share the load 7. Do the prep work (understand the licenses) 6
academia and industry to better understand industry’s specificcommunication needs and priorities [19]. There have been many attempts to alleviate theseconcerns, which include requiring technical writing courses, modifying assignment structure toimprove the iterative writing process, introducing engineers to interdisciplinary writing contexts,and teaching writing via self-reflection for experimental lab report writing [20]-[22]. Theseefforts are a useful start to address these issues, but there is a dearth of studies that demonstratethe long-term effectiveness of these interventions.Spatial and Verbal Skills for Engineering StudentsPrior work by Project Talent, which conducted a longitudinal study following 400,000 highschool students 11+ years
spy gadgets and their countermeasures, consumers are drawn tospy detector devices. [6]. Spy detectors typically have a common set of features, including RFdetection for wireless cameras and microphones, magnetic field detection for GPS trackers, andflashing LED infrared lights that capture camera lens reflections [1][2]. The more expensivedevices come with sounds and haptic vibrations to alert for possible detection. Unscrupuloussellers make inaccurate claims that devices prevent camera spying when, in reality, the devicesonly provide detection, giving their customers the false impression that a camera is no longercapable of spying on them.This paper presents a project by a senior capstone team of four students who aimed to develop anadvanced
performbetter on the PSVT:R compared to freshmen. Additionally, it is worth noting that the literaturesuggests that once a certain threshold is reached (e.g., above 20), further discrimination in scoresmay not necessarily reflect additional performance gain. In other words, a score of 22 versus 23may not significantly impact the interpretation of spatial skills, as both are considered strong.Further AnalysisWhile this initial analysis provides valuable insights, there are additional analytical methods thatcan be employed, such as factor analysis and item response theory, to gain a deeper understandingof the findings. These methods can help elucidate the underlying factors contributing to spatialskills and provide a more nuanced perspective.One of the
thegame for all three cohorts, and qualitative analysis based on students’ de-identified responses toa reflection question at the graduate level. Students were informed that grading was solely basedon completion of their quantitative and/or qualitative responses with good faith effort. Each student participant in the game represented an imaginary province, and studentsalso formed groups of four students each, where each group represented an imaginary nation.Each imaginary nation and province was allocated ten points at the beginning of each of the fourdecades. For each decade, students had to make individual provincial decisions as well ascollective national decisions to determine how to allocate ten points to protect their province
-distance culture in India [12], where students do notquestion or openly disagree or complain about faculty, to a low power-distance culture in the USwhere students are expected to discuss, question and share expectations created challenges inteacher-student interactions. Also, in the US institution, expectations from students for activelearning are high, and they do not hesitate to express their displeasure.At the US institution, the program has seen a relatively high rate of turnover among non-whitenon-male new hires, which could also be reflective of the culture. The work culture and dailyroutine at the workplace is also quite different compared to India. For example, consistent withan individualistic society, faculty in the US institution
, S. Zappe, and I. Osunbunmi, “Lessons Learned: FacultyDevelopment Book Club to Promote Reflection among Engineering Faculty on Mental Health ofStudents,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2024.[9] “About,” Mental Health First Aid, Oct. 18,2013. https://www.mentalhealthfirstaid.org/about/[10] Calm, “Experience Calm,” Calm, 2019. https://www.calm.com/ (accessed Jan. 25,2024).
something tangible that serves as evidence of success, potentially increasing theirsense of belonging in this space. Figure 3: A completed wooden dieResults and DiscussionAmong the 1600 or so student responses analyzed from the assigned post lab reflection, theauthors found that that the student submissions fell into two categories: a. Beginner: Students who had no or some experience with tool usage b. Expert: Students who had a lot of experience in hand tool usage.Representative responses that were typical to both categories to three relevant questions askedare included below:In responding to the question, ‘Prior to today’s lab, have you ever worked with hand tools? Didyou enjoy working with them today? Why
course framework is described to help with first-year students’ professional development. A common practice of growing professional skill sets isto obtain internship opportunities as the industry is generally looking for applicants who are atintermediate or advanced levels. However, the first-year students generally would have few solidtechnical skills. Therefore, the research question is how to help first-year students gain essentialskills before they apply for internships and become future workforce [1, 2]. Constructivism is thetheory that states that learners can construct knowledge rather than passively absorb informationfrom educators. As people experience the world and reflect on those experiences, they constructtheir own representations