real-worldcustomer requirement, then offer one or more solutions by explaining real-worldmachines, or processes, or systems, or management tasks and then discuss furtherdevelopment, service, maintenance, integration, connectivity and many other issues withseveral feedback loops, and then offer discussion opportunities for real or virtual teams.In terms of delivering the individual cases in the Library the 3D Virtual Product Democoncept is followed, an innovation on its own, in that learners are taken virtually intoreal hi-tech factories, R&D studios, exhibitions and laboratories and are given interesting Page 8.87.3Proceedings of the 2003
that can be tackled with simple tools and small budgets. We have createda Freshman seminar subject at MIT in which the students build and modify a kit-based modelrocket. In parallel we discuss the elements of rocket physics and guide them in creating theirown predictions of the what the acceleration curve should look like for the rockets. Their goalfor the term is to collect the data needed to test their predictions. To accomplish it, they build acompact microcontroller circuit that can log acceleration at 1,000 samples per second. Duringthe term, the students learn the basics of programming the microcontroller and explore its uses inthe laboratory. At the end of the term, the class goes to a large open area, launches the rockets,and returns
Engineering Education.5. Devens, P.E. 2000. MATLAB & Freshman Engineering. Proceedings of the 2000 American Society for Engineering Education. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education.6. MATLAB”, MATrix LABoratory is a trademark of The Mathworks, Inc..7. Piepeier, J.A., Knowles, K.A., and Bishop, B.E. 2002. The Use of MATLAB for Robotic Control in an Undergraduate Robotics Laboratory. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education.8. Rizkalla, M.E., Yokomoto, C.F., and Oloughlin, C.L. 1996. A New Design-Oriented Approach for Freshman Engineering. Proceedings of the 1996 American Society for Engineering Education. Washington, D.C
student (STS); Community and primary impact is that Economic Development people do things differently as a result RESEARCH • Basic research • Mu ltidisciplinary and • Applied research • Student laboratories SCHOLARSHIP • Original works integrative research • Policy research • Thesis and dissertation • Evaluation research • Cross-disciplinary teams • Performances of research (the objective is
Page 8.848.1 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationparticular laboratory group, students doing research at either the undergraduate or the graduatelevel and their advisors can benefit from specific training in the mentoring aspects of thisrelationship. The Mentoring Workshop project we describe here has been developed by theWomen in Science and Engineering (WISE) Committee at the University of Cincinnati, avolunteer faculty committee which was created in 1996. The Workshop was first developed tosupplement the WISE Summer Research Experience for Women Undergraduates (REWU), whichis in its fourth
these perspectives.FacultyThe primary risk factor for engineering retention that affects the faculty was workload. Toaccomplish the important, necessary tasks for teaching was not possible, given the number ofengineering faculty employed. Faculty were required to carry 12 semester hours of class and 12office hours each semester. With required laboratories, the student contact hours increased evenmore. At the time of the study, the department had ten full time faculty members. Of the ten,one was the department chair and another was the associate dean both of which had thecommensurate administrative duties further increasing faculty workload. Some of the areasaffected include: • Assessment – assessment tools are not utilized as they should
; Engineering, Portland, OR, and Michigan Technological University,Houghton, MI.4. Coppola, R., Malyn-Smith, J. editors (2006). Preparing for the Perfect Storm—A Report on the Forum TakingAction Together: Developing a National Action Plan to Address the "T&E" of STEM. Parametric TechnologyCorporation, Needham, MA, and EDC, Newton, MA.5. Altman, J.H. (1997). Career development in the context of family experiences, in Diversity and Women’sCareer Development: from Adolescence to Adulthood, edited by Helen S. Farmer, pp. 229-242. Thousand Oaks,CA.6. Jordan, et al., (2002). Emerging issues in school, family, & community connections. National Center forFamily & Community Connections with Schools, Southwest Educational Development Laboratory
AC 2012-4919: FRESHMAN AND SOPHOMORE INTRODUCTION TOMANUFACTURING-RELATED ENGINEERING HANDBOOKS USING KNOVELDATABASESProf. Julia L. Morse, Kansas State University, Salina Julia Morse is Associate Professor and Program Coordinator for mechanical engineering technology at Kansas State University, K-State, Salina. She teaches lecture and laboratory courses in the areas of man- ufacturing, automation, and computer-aided design. Morse earned a B.S.I.E. from the University of Ten- nessee, Knoxville, and a M.S. in manufacturing systems engineering from Auburn University, where she also worked with Auburn Industrial Extension Service. Her work in industry includes engineering ex- perience in quality control, industrial
significantchanges was switching from programming in C to programming in MATLAB in the fall of 2009,since MATLAB has become the major language used in various engineering disciplines forproblem solving [1, 4, 5]. Following this, the course changed its meeting time from three times aweek to four times a week. It now uses a 2+2 format: two days of lecture per week, with eachlecture day followed by laboratory time to facilitate material understanding by hands-on practice. Page 25.705.2Approximately 120 students will attend one-hour lecture in an auditorium. The following day,students attend a small lab session, usually 26 students, to allow more contact with
that they need to work harder; boosted their self-esteem when they gotgood grades during the program; got more confident in freshman year classes; and founda study buddy. The second and third groups agreed that the mathematics and chemistryclasses served as a good review before the beginning of fall semester. Some studentsfrom the second group stated that they knew what to expect in college, and the scienceclass helped in learning how to write laboratory reports. The third group’s students statedthat the study skills class was good in teaching them time management. Page 25.711.9Discussion:In examining the results obtained, it was indicated that
25.954.3curricula usually includes lecture and laboratory based courses that are typically designed as 3semester credit hours. Both disciplines emphasize industry feedback and professional practiceconcerns to be included in the curriculum 21,22,23.“Architecture Construction Alliance” (A+CA) leads the interdisciplinary collaboration efforts atan institutional level. A+CA is a unique organization whose mission is “ … to fostercollaboration among schools that are committed to fostering interdisciplinary educational andresearch efforts between the fields of architecture and construction, and to engage leadingprofessionals and educators in support of these efforts 24.” The alliance recently conducted ashort survey of member institutions to define (and benchmark
the Microdevices Laboratory at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory.Eli Fromm, Drexel University Dr. Eli Fromm is the Roy A. Brothers University Professor and Director of the Center for Educational Research in the College of Engineering of Drexel University. He has held a number of academic leadership positions and included among them are Vice President for Educational Research, Vice Provost for Research and Graduate Studies, and interim Dean of Engineering at Drexel. He has also held positions with the General Electric and DuPont companies, has been a staff member of the Science Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives as a Congressional Fellow, a Program Director at NSF, and a Visiting
/w7241e/w7241e06.htm#TopOfPage. Retrieved on 2008-05-25.[9] Philibert, Cédric. "The Present and Future use of Solar Thermal Energy as a Primary Source of Energy" (PDF). International Energy Agency. [10] Muhs, Jeff. "Design and Analysis of Hybrid Solar Lighting and Full-Spectrum Solar EnergySystems" (PDF). Oak Ridge National Laboratory.[11] "Solar Energy Technologies and Applications". Canadian Renewable Energy[12] "Energy Consumption Characteristics of Commercial Building HVAC Systems Volume III: EnergySavings Potential" (PDF). United States Department of Energy. 2-2.http://www.doas-radiant.psu.edu/DOE_report.pdf.[13] "Household Water Treatment Options in Developing Countries: Solar Disinfection (SODIS)" (PDF). Centers for Disease
Unified Robotics courses are offered in 7-week terms with 4 hours oflecture and 2 hours of laboratory session per week. Further in concept with the long history ofthe WPI Plan [16], these courses emphasize project based-learning, hands-on assignments, andstudents’ commitment to learning outside the classroom.Capstone Design ExperienceThe RBE capstone senior design experience serves as the binding agent for the theory andpractice learned in our core RBE courses and should demonstrate application of the skills,methods, and knowledge gained in the program to the solution of a problem that typicallyinvolves the design and manufacture of a robotic system. Further, our recent experience withrobotics capstone projects indicates that student learning is
. Instructor helped me understand importance B6. Instructor used well articulated learning obj. B7. My instructor communicated effectively. B8. Laboratories contributed to my learning. B9. Instructor demonstrated positive expectations. B10. My instructor used visual images. B11. Instructor gave timely/accurate feedback. B12. Instructor was available outside classroom. B13. Grading practices are fair/reflect performance. B14. The Exam's were fair and relevant. 072S 082S 092SFigure 2 Multi-Year Assessment Department Level Pedagogy QuestionsThe results presented so far have been based on
Press, 1993.[11] J. S. Byrd and J. L. Hudgkins, "Teaming in the design laboratory," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 84, pp. 335, 1995.[12] E. Seat and S. M. Lord, "Enabling effective engineering teams: a program for teaching interaction skills," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 88, pp. 385, 1999.[13] P. Lewis, D. Aldridge, and P. Swamidass, "Assessing teaming skills acquisition on undergraduate project teams," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 87, pp. 149, 1998.[14] C. Weinstein and R. Mayer, The teaching of learning strategies. New York: MacMillan, 1986.[15] C. Johnston and G. Dainton, "Learning Combination Inventory Users Manual,",, unpublished manuscript 1997.[16] C. F. Yokomoto
curriculum is formed by a merger of manycurriculum subspaces, which are the unique curricula for each non-EE area. Each curriculumsub-space is designed independently for one non-EE engineering field and includes the requiredtopics and their associated depth of coverage. The intersection of curriculum subspaces forms thecore of the final curriculum that will be taught in the lecture portion of the class. The areas thatare unique to each non-EE field forms the web-based curriculum. The laboratory will also bedesigned accordingly: some in-class lab experiments will be designed to address the needs of allnon-EE majors, and some in-class as well as web-based lab experiments, will be designed toaddress the special needs of each non-EE field.We started by
theonline group (16.0%). The Circuits course is the first course in Electrical Engineering (EE), andis therefore more important to EE majors than to students majoring in other fields of engineering.It can also be inferred that the perceived importance of the Circuits course to EE majors may beone of the reasons why fewer of them take the class online. Another advantage of the on-campusgroup is the number of students who were concurrently taking the laboratory class for Circuits.A majority (83.3%) of on-campus students were taking the Circuits lecture and laboratorycourses simultaneously while only 12% of the online students were enrolled in the laboratoryclass. The laboratory class gives students opportunities to apply and experimentally
Courses to Improve Student Performance and Retention at a Minority Institution”, presented at the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference 6. www.csun.edu/me 7. J. Estell and J. Hurtig, “Using Rubrics for the Assessment of Senior Design Projects”, presented at the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference 8. E. Cooney, “Laboratory Report Grading Rubrics: What High School Teachers are Doing”, presented at the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference 9. R. Kellogg, J. Mann, and A. Dieterich, “Developing and Using Rubrics to Evaluate Subjective Engineering Laboratory and Design Reports”, presented at the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference 10. M. Schuurman, L. Pauley, and D. Gouran, “Assessment of Students’ Oral Communication Skills: Do Students and
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 question numberFigure 5: Comparison of exam questions involving topics with and without demonstrations forcurrent and previous semesters. Questions 1, 2, 4 and 5 involve topics related to the tools andquestion 3 does not.References [1] A.M. Ibrahim, “Economical integration of virtual laboratories in eet curricula”, in Pro- ceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. ASEE, 2001. [2] D.J. Olinger and J.C. Hermanson, “Integrated thermal-fluid experiments in wpi’s discovery classroom”, Journal of Engineering Education, 2002. [3] W.C Crone, A.B. Ellis, A.C. Payne, K.W. Lux, A.K
). Additionally, thereis a unique research opportunity for both educator and NASA career employees in the NASAAdministrator's Fellow Program (NAFP).NAFP Program The NAFP program provides opportunities for both NASA employees and theMathematics, Science, Engineering, and Technology (MSET) faculty of Minority ServingInstitutions (MSIs). The NAFP program is designed to enhance the professional development ofthe participants. Furthermore, NAFP program assists NASA by increasing the ability of theparticipating MSIs to respond to its overall research and development mission. The NAFP hasbeen successfully implemented since 1997, with participants from all NASA Centers, JetPropulsion Laboratory, and MSIs, which are listed in Tables 1 and 2, respectively
keytheorists, namely Jay W. Forrester, W. Edwards Deming, Russell Ackoff, Peter Senge, andMargaret Wheatley, and outlining some of the central lessons that would enable a person familiarwith systems thinking to make a difference at an interpersonal, team, and organizational level.ForresterKnown and credited for being the creator of the field of systems dynamics in the mid 1950’s, JayForrester’s ideas about the behavior of systems began to emerge long before. Born in Nebraskaon July 14, 1918, Jay W. Forrester went on to received a B.S. degree in electrical engineeringfrom the University of Nebraska in 1939 and his M.S. degree from MIT in 1945. He stayed on tobecome director of MIT's Lincoln Digital Computer Laboratory until he changed his focus
Handbook for College Teachers, 4th edition ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc., 1993.[10] R. A. Guzzo and M. W. Dickson, "Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness," Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 47, pp. 307, 1996.[11] J. R. Katzenbach and D. K. Smith, The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High Performance Organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1993.[12] J. S. Byrd and J. L. Hudgkins, "Teaming in the design laboratory," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 84, pp. 335, 1995.[13] E. Seat and S. M. Lord, "Enabling effective engineering teams: a program for teaching interaction skills," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 88, pp. 385, 1999
environmental burden of a product, process or activity byidentifying and quantifying material and energy usage and waste outputs at every life stage.LCA involves three steps: identification of scope of analysis, life cycle inventory, and impactanalysis. Such an approach has two attractive features for engineers. First, it is a rational andquantitative process that is easily appreciated by engineers. Second, because it examines allstages of the life cycle, it allows engineers to easily identify what design or processimprovements will lead to the greatest reduction in environmental impact.The present paper will describe a laboratory experience used in a senior level materials andprocess selection design course developed by the author. The project
theperformance.Figure 6 shows a similar comparison study of the same samples in the small tube. For the low-cost tube, the absorption measured is significantly higher than empty reference tube. This isattributed to the rougher surface finish the schedule 40 PVC pipes use that causes disturbance inplaner wave. For higher performing samples i.e. fiberglass and cotton shoddy, the agreement inperformance is acceptable.We believe the tube is very useful for instructional purpose as well as conducting relativecomparisons among various acoustic materials in order to rank order the test materials withoutrequirement of expensive laboratory testing or similar test practices. It appears that the relativerank ordering is the same for results from the reference tube as
., Murray, L. B., Dubea, C., & Williams, M. K. (1987). Continuing to learn: A guidebook for teacher development. Andover, MA: Regional Laboratory for Educational Improvement of the Northeast & Islands.6. Klingner, J. K. (2004). The science of professional development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 248-255.7. Lewis, J., & Day, G. (2004). Continuing professional development for teachers. Journal of Biological Education, 38, 144-144.8. Bredeson, P.V. (2000). Teacher learning as work and at work: exploring the content and contexts of teacher professional development. Journal of In-Service Education, 26, 63-72.9. Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). The quiet revolution: Rethinking teacher development
students, and her research in the areas of recruitment and retention. A SWE and ASEE Fellow, she is a frequent speaker on career opportunities and diversity in engineering.Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez, Arizona State University Prior to joining the ASU Electrical Engineering faculty in 1990, Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez worked at MIT, IBM, AT&T Bell Laboratories and Raytheon Missile Systems. He has also consulted for Eglin Air Force Base, Boeing Defense and Space Systems, Honeywell and NASA. He has published over 200 tech- nical papers in refereed journals and conference proceedings – over 60 with students. He has authored three engineering texts on classical controls, linear systems, and multivariable control. Dr. Rodriguez has
Paper ID #9125Examining Diffusion Networks and Identifying Opinion Leaders: A CaseStudy of the AIChE Concept WarehouseDr. Debra M. Gilbuena, Oregon State University Debra Gilbuena is a postdoctoral scholar in the School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engi- neering at Oregon State University. Debra has an M.BA, an M.S, and four years of industrial experience including a position in sensor development. Sensor development is also an area in which she holds a patent. She currently has research focused on student learning in virtual laboratories and the diffusion of educational interventions and
manufacturing facilitate energy-efficiency in the commercial building industry. Another research interest of Kristen’s is engineering education, where she explores how project- and experience-based learning foster better understanding of engineering and management principles. Prior to joining ASU, Kristen was at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) as a Postdoctoral Fellow (2009-11) and then a Scientific Engineering Associate (2011-2012) in the Building Technologies and Urban Systems Department. She worked in the Commercial Buildings group, developing energy effi- ciency programs and researching technical and non-technical barriers to energy efficiency in the buildings industry. She has a background in
Youngstown State University, with a Bachelors of Engineering degree in Electrical Engineering in 1981. He then obtained his MS and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from GA Tech in 1982, and 1988 respectively. He joined the Electrical and Computer Engineering department at the University of New Mexico where he is currently professor and was the chair between 2005 and June 30, 2011. Since July 1, 2011, Professor Abdallah is the Provost and Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs at UNM. Professor Abdallah conducts research and teaches courses in the general area of systems theory with focus on control and communica- tions systems. His research has been funded by national funding agencies, national laboratories, and by