? Would QM skill, if well developed, be useful in your Engineering Career? Would you think that QM should be taught in all Engineering disciplines programs? If a student can understand Basic QM mathematical formulations well, then would you think dealing with other physical concepts such as electromagnetism, thermodynamics, classical mechanics, etc…. be easier ? Would knowing QM be enabling you to communicate more effectively in any physical arguments? Don’t you think that knowing QM as an intellectual tool would impress your interviewer and generally in your resume for job application would show an outstanding advantage? At some stages during physics class some students feel so overwhelmed by
communication capabilities. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Peer Feedback on Teamwork Behaviors: Reactions and Intentions to ChangeIntroductionThe ability to work well in a team has been identified by the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) as one of the required graduate outcomes that engineeringprograms must address to meet accreditation standards1. A career in industry will inevitablyinvolve team membership, as companies utilize teamwork to ensure quality control and processsmoothness2. Given this need, engineering programs must encourage the development of theinterpersonal skills necessary for teamwork in their curricula in order
came “Analysis of Networks and Strategies” and “DataMining and Risk Assessment” in the fall 2014 and then “Informatics and SoftwareDevelopment” in 2015.These new courses were seen as critical to an engineering managers’ career success giventhe countless systems producing massive amounts of data in today’s businessenvironment. Engineering professionals are necessary who can analyze complex data,extract knowledge from it, and deploy management strategies based on their insight togive or maintain a competitive advantage to their company.5 The business world hasalready made known that there will be a dire need in the next decade for professionalswho can harness data into meaningful information that can be used in the making ofcritical decisions.6
andteaching the elementary, middle and high school students about internet safety and security wasgiven special importance during this period [10] [13]. They also have age appropriate resourcesfor kids . AFA has taken a step further to educate students on Cyber Security by organizingactivities for students from Elementary level. The ESCEI aims at teaching the students at theselevels about the importance of STEM education and careers in an interactive way. They designeddifferent modules for K-3 graders and for 4th to 6th graders.Cyber Security programs for Non IT StudentsCyber Security programs usually have multi disciplinary approach covering Management, Law,Business, psychology and Technology areas [18]. Though this course is considered ideal
based on the need of the program constituencies. The current PEOs for the MEprogram at UTSA states that the within a few years after graduation, the graduates will: (1) haveengineering careers in industry, government, and/or will pursue advanced graduate orprofessional degrees, (2) apply their engineering skills to their careers, (3) continue to advancetheir knowledge, communication and leadership skills by using technology, continuingeducation, solving problems, and serving in technical or professional societies, and (4) applytheir understanding of societal, environmental, and ethical issues to their professional activities.These PEOs are consistent with the institutional mission, and the program’s constituents’ needs.ABET EAC used to require
. Journal of Cooperative Education & Internships, 33(1), 6- 24.6. Somers, G. (1995). The post-graduation pecuniary benefits of co-op participation: A review of the literature. Journal of Cooperative Education, 31(1): 25-41.7. Ingram, S., Bruning, S. & I. Mikawoz. (2009). Career and mentor satisfaction among Canadian engineers: Are there differences based on gender and company-specific undergraduate work experiences? Journal of Engineering Education, 98(2): 333-338.8. Ingram, S.A. (2005). Making the transition from engineering student to practicing professional: A profile of two women. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1): 151-157.9. Blair, B.F., Miller, M. & J. Hammer. (2004). The Impact of cooperative
of these pedagogical interventions to enhance the innovation capacity of the students.We derive our findings by analyzing data collected as a part of the Educate to Innovate projectthat was initiated to understand what factors contribute to the success of innovators, and howthese factors can be incorporated into our education system. Charles Vest, the former presidentof the National Academy of Engineering (NAE), appointed an advisory committee for the projectwho provided guidance to this research team at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign(UIUC) who would interview a select group of successful American innovators and ask them toreflect on their education and careers, and to identify factors that contributed to them
1 illustrates the investigation embeddedwithin the conceptual framework. Developing a community of practice can be an effectivemeans for helping new teachers learn to teach. “Communities of practice are groups of peoplewho share a concern, a set of problems, or a passion about a topic, and who deepen theirknowledge and expertise in the area by interacting on an ongoing basis” (p. 5).2 The biomedicalengineering fellows were interested in learning about and educating students with reform-basedinstructional practices. It is anticipated that fellows work together with faculty and mentorteachers as a community to develop a shared knowledge about the practice of teaching science inpreparation for future careers as tenured faculty members at the
manufacturing content,along with employability skills, while borrowing best practices from ‘wood shop’ and‘technology education’ classes. The hope is that this course will bolster many of the ‘Attributesof Engineers in 2020’ described by the National Academy of Engineering and 21st CenturySkills—these skills and attributes can be beneficial to any college or career path, not just one inengineering. The course incorporates design-build activities into entrepreneurial and businesscontexts, providing relevance to foundational math skills and science practices while integratingproblem solving and cutting-edge technology. The course requires that students draw and renderdesign concepts, communicate design concepts to their peers and clients, fabricate
Engineering from the University of Illinois.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette enay Purzer is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education. She is the recipient of a 2012 NSF CAREER award, which examines how engineering students approach innovation. She serves on the editorial boards of Science Education and the Journal of Pre-College Engineering Educa- tion (JPEER). She received a B.S.E with distinction in Engineering in 2009 and a B.S. degree in Physics Education in 1999. Her M.A. and Ph.D. degrees are in Science Education from Arizona State University earned in 2002 and 2008, respectively.Mr. Mitch Zielinski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Mitch Zielinski is a fourth-year
nature of the courses that they identified as their favoriteand least favorite. How engineering students approach and think about learning can substantiallyinfluence their success as students, completion of degrees as engineers, and their effectiveengagement in careers. Further, if instructors, advisors and administrators have a deeperunderstanding of the learning process and traits of students they can teach, advise and plan inways that enhance student success.As we answered our first research question it became apparent that engineering students’motivational goals for learning shift significantly and substantially from mastery in their favoritecourses to more of a performance approach in their least favorite courses. Our findings indicatethat
a unique 4-course mod- ule focused on creativity and problem solving leadership and is currently developing a new methodology for cognition-based design. She is one of three instructors for Penn State’s Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) on Creativity, Innovation, and Change, and she is the founding director of the Problem Solving Research Group, whose 50+ collaborating members include faculty and students from several universities, as well as industrial representatives, military leaders, and corporate consultants.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette enay Purzer is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education. She is the recipient of a 2012 NSF CAREER award, which examines how
. Following anexplanation for the focus on role identification, each role will be described in turn.Focus on Roles In an effort to focus the research conversation around academic entrepreneurship, Jain,George, and Maltarich3 focus on the “university scientist” and his process of modifying hispersonal career-related role identity from an academic researcher to an academic entrepreneur.This distinction relates to the types of commercialization activities that academic research facultymembers are increasingly expected to perform. While the Jain et al.3 study generalized theentrepreneurial role as encompassing a broad set of activities, which include consulting andpatenting, the author for this study posits that there are separate roles - which
students in one ormore of the three categories of 21st Century Skills: Learning and Innovation; Information, Media,& Technology Literacy; and Life & Career 3. Although the mission is still the same, thepartnership with UF SWE is unique in that the primary audience is middle school students.3D Printing as OutreachIn addition to the mechanics of the printing operation, our service includes several componentsthat mimic other, more traditional aspects of public service with which librarians are veryfamiliar: repeated explanations of the basic service, development of an online guide(http://guides.uflib.ufl.edu/3dprinter), the reference interview to accompany each submission,and instruction sessions. As is typical with other library services
products. He demonstrates an in-depth understanding of and ability to execute the product development process. Jim is experienced in analog and digital electronics and also in manufacturing and automation engineer- ing. He has successfully refocused his career from developing new products to developing new engineers. Professor Globig teaches courses in Electronic Engineering Technology, primarily in the areas of analog electronics and data acquisition systems. Page 26.84.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 A Practical Approach
economies. He received the U.S. National Science Foundation’s Early Career Award in 2009. He is co-editor of the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (CHEER) published by Cam- bridge University Press, New York, NY. Dr. Johri earned his Ph.D. in Learning Sciences and Technology Design at Stanford University and a B.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering at Delhi College of Engineering.Mr. Karthik Nagappan, George Mason UniversityMr. Aref Modanlu, George Mason University Graduate Research Assistant Page 26.182.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015An Empirical Study of
. Additionally, he has six years of industrial experience as a Senior Engineer and 17 years of academic experience as a professor, Associate Professor, and Assistant Professor. Foroudastan’s academic experience includes teaching at Tennessee Technological University and Middle Tennessee State University in the areas of civil engineering, me- chanical engineering, and engineering technology. He has actively advised undergraduate and graduate students, alumni, and minority students in academics and career guidance. Foroudastan has also served as Faculty Advisor for SAE, Mechanical Engineering Technology, Pre-engineering, ASME, Experimental Vehicles Program (EVP), and Tau Alpha Pi Honors Society. In addition to Foroudastan’s
andLocations (Figure 3). These allow a better overall understanding of how the many componentsconnect. Line color is used to distinguish between different working fluids present. Table 2: Summary of expert review comments on material. Strengths There is a good overview of systems students are likely to encounter in their careers. The provided Glossary is a good aid to the reader due to the technical “jargon” that is present in these fields. The sidebar links to additional information help provide further understanding. The assignments drive home the key and important concepts. Weaknesses The material jumps from being general to site
for ideas, problem solving, division of effort, and 3) working with external companies/agencies? RESULT: 4.7 out of 5 4) Career Inspiration: How well did working on the TEST satellite program develop your gifts and passion? RESULT: 4.7 out of 5 5) Preparation for the “Real –world” after Graduation: How well did working on the TSAT satellite program give you “hands-on, real-world” experience that prepared you for work or graduate/professional school after graduation? RESULT: 4.8 out of 5Alumni Survey Examples: Several examples as quotes…..Graduate A: For the past 15 years, the Physics and Engineering department has integrated arare blend of theoretical rigor and
Paper ID #13280Engineering Rome: Assessing Outcomes from a Study Abroad Program De-signed to Overcome Barriers to ParticipationDr. Steve Muench P.E., University of Washington Steve Muench is an Associate Professor in the University of Washington’s Department of Civil and Envi- ronmental Engineering. His interests include sustainability, construction, roads, pavements, web tools and education. He is a licensed professional engineer in Washington State. Before his academic career, Steve spent 2 years as a transportation design engineer and 7 years as a U.S. Navy submarine officer. Steve lives in Seattle but likes neither
whether they want to continue their academicexperience at the graduate level. Additionally, the undergraduate research in the curriculumprovides students with a clearer understanding of career options in the E&ET fields, whileproducing more informed, committed and better prepared graduate students with greaterpotential for success in graduate programs. It gives students a deeper and more matureunderstanding and appreciation of E&ET in general, contributing to students’ personal andprofessional growth. Engineering and Engineering Technology programs with strong Page 26.945.2undergraduate research produce better prepared and more qualified
Paper ID #11784Infusing a Concurrent Engineering Model into AcademiaProf. John Wadach, Monroe Community College John Wadach is a professor and department chair of the Engineering Science and Physics Department at Monroe Community College in Rochester, NY. He has taught a variety of physics and engineering courses in his 30 year career. Wadach is most inspired by the use of design-build projects in his engineering courses. Infusing a Concurrent Engineering Model into Academia is the title of the NSF TUES grant that he and co-PIs George Fazekas and Paul Brennan were awarded $200,000. Wadach has been the co-organizer of
strong science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) workforce is essential and critical in advancing the economy and society of the future. But the U.S continues to trail the world in math and science. And also the number of U.S students pursuing a STEM career or educating is decreasing as mentioned in [1] – [3]. A change in the way math is taught and presented in the classroom is urgently needed. Instructors need to be able to engage the students in learning by communicating that the study of mathematics and its objective is not to study math for math sake but to be able to apply it as a tool to solve the world’s complex and essential problems. The topic of sustainable energy is no longer a topic reserved for scientists and
). Leveraging theadditional knowledge and skills that a student gains via co-op to undertake more challengingsenior projects is the focus of this paper.Skills Sets Acquired Through Co-opThe skills most commonly gained associated with a cooperative education program include:improved social skills[8] (negotiating, team-building, leadership, appropriate listening andspeaking skills, and basic etiquette); communication, teamwork, and understanding ethics andprofessionalism[9]; work skills development, career development, and academic functions[10]; andsocialization to the workplace and occupational roles.[11] Perhaps first among these skills is theability to comfortably communicate and interact with other engineers in an industrialenvironment. In-class
Paper ID #14062MAKER: Hands-On Engineering Scavenger Hunt, a CNC Clue ChallengeRobyn Paul, University of Calgary Robyn is a Master of Science candidate in Civil Engineering at the Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary. At present, her research focuses on the nebulous field of engineering leadership education, specifically its impact on early career success. Over and above her academic endeavors, she has co-founded the Engineering Education Students’ Society and is involved with initiatives to collaborate na- tionally and internationally, creating a space to increase the conversation with students about
Association of College and Research Libraries defines information literacy as: “…a set ofabilities requiring individuals to recognize when information is needed and have the ability tolocate, evaluate, and use effectively the needed information."5Once students graduate and begin careers as engineers they should be information literate. Thisstudy shows that most engineers in design firms have limited access to information resources soteaching effective use of search engines like Google and how to know when assistance from alocal library might be appropriate could be essential parts of the engineering curriculum. Page 26.1445.5Since 2004 there has been a
. Page 26.1460.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Teachers’ Use of Argumentation in the Development of Integrated STEM Curricula (Fundamental)Over the past several years, there has been a growing concern that the United States is notproducing enough students who are prepared for careers in science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM), which is needed if the U.S. is to continue to be internationallycompetitive1,2. Efforts placed on improving STEM education have the potential to not only meetthese demands but also to improve STEM literacy of all citizens3.Recent national policy documents have focused their attention on STEM for primary andsecondary
Survey ofCollege Graduates (NSCG). These data are made available by a variety of government agenciesand present the STEM workforce generally and engineering technicians and technologists inparticular in varying degrees of detail. The educational datasets used in this analysis are theIntegrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), the Baccalaureate and Beyond2008/2009 (B&B), and the Career/Technical Education (CTE) Statistics. These educationaldatasets are produced and distributed by the Department of Education’s National Center forEducation Statistics. The various data sources are summarized in Table 1. Table 1 Summary of engineering technology data sources Education data Employment data ACS
to theculture and the expectations of the United States. The university has observed that academicsuccess is tied to the student’s ability to be accepted in the culture and feeling a sense ofbelonging.The transitional challenges like challenge to socialize with American peers, feeling of inferiorityor “second class citizenship” and interaction with the faculty affect the student’s ability tounderstand the new culture and socialize with American students. In order to help the firstcoming Indian graduate students in the construction department, the department not only needsto be involved in their academic career success, but also the success in student’s social life. This
degreein mechanical engineering while the other had worked in the construction field. Although neitherhad experience in engineering education methods, faculty members from a nearby engineeringcollege provided guidance. Before designing individual courses, the teachers generated twodocuments intended to form the foundation of all ensuring coursework. The first of thesedocuments, entitled the Academic Standards, focused on five key areas for student development:1) STEM career exploration, 2) collaborative teamwork skills, 3) STEM skills and knowledge, 4)open-ended hands-on design, and 5) communication skills. The second, called the Grade LevelExpectations, broadly outlined the learning outcomes for each of the program’s four years. Theseexpectations