. Cryptonote v2.0. Technical report, CryptoNote. Accessed: Oct. 21, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf[18] S. Eskandari, A. Leoutsarakos, T. Mursch, and J. Clark. A First Look at Browser-based Cryptojacking. In Proc. of the IEEE Privacy and Security on the Blockchain Workshop, London, UK, Apr. 2018, [Online]. Available: https://arXiv:1803.02887[19] T. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and Ruby B. Lee, “CloudRadar: A Real-Time Side-Channel Attack Detection System in Clouds,” In Proc. of the International Symposium on Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection, Evry, France, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-45719-2_6[20] Bitcoincharts. Accessed: Oct. 21, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://bitcoincharts.com
schedule using simple example problems. These examples tend to be composedof only a few activities and resources which support development of an initial schedule and oftendo not address the impact of scope changes that require reallocation of resources and revisions tothe schedule. Successfully adjusting resource allocation to address project scope and activityduration changes requires a solid understanding of project crashing. Project crashing involvesshortening project duration by reducing the time of one or more activities. Crashing is done byincreasing the resources to the project, and involves cost and schedule trade-offs. The integratedexample focuses on minimizing the total cost that results from (a) resource allocation, (b)activity
continuing to expand their technical skills in the area of automatic controls andautomation.Bibliography[1] B. Ray, "An Inexpensive Control System Experiment: Modeling, Simulation, and Laboratory Implementation ofa PID Controller-Based System," in Proceedings of the ASEE's 123rd Annual Conference and Expositiion, NewOrleans, 2015.[2] A Low-Cost Control System Experiment for Engineering Technology Students” by Dr. Curtis Cohenour Ph.D.,P.E. P.E., Ohio University, Proceedings of the ASEE's 125rd Annual Conference and Expositiion, Columbus, Ohio,2017.[3] Ch. 24, Hybrid Lab Text, W. Evans, eng.utoledo.edu/~wevans[4] Ch. 20, Hybrid Lab Text, W. Evans, eng.utoledo.edu/~wevans[5] Ch. 19, Hybrid Lab Text, W. Evans, eng.utoledo.edu/~wevans[6] Ch. 14, Hybrid
supporting entrepreneurship around Stevens Campus. Sandra also teaches courses in Entrepreneurial Thinking and Innovation at Baruch College and Lafayette College. Before coming to Stevens, Sandra worked as a consulting engineer with Stantec and T and M Associates specializing in Urban Land Redevelopment and Municipal Engineering. Sandra holds a B.S. Degree in Civil & Environmental Engineering, an A. B. degree in Art History from Lafayette College and a Master of Engineering degree in Engineering Management from Stevens Institute of Technology. She also holds a Professional Engineering license in NJ.Dr. Kishore Pochiraju, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science) Kishore Pochiraju is the
Science Education, vol. 31, no.4, pp. 541-550, 2009.[3] M. B. B. Magdola, M. B. B, “The activity of meaning-making: A holistic perspective oncollege student development,” Journal of College Student Development, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 621-639, 2009.[4] D. E. Schrader, “Constructivism and learning in the age of social media: Changing minds andlearning communities,” New Directions for Teaching and Learning, vol. 144, pp. 23-35, 2015.[5] L. S. Shulman, “Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform,” HarvardEducational Review, vol. 57, no.1, pp. 1–22, 1987.[6] G. Ladson-Billings, “Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy,” AmericanEducational Research Journal, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 465–491, 1995.[7] G. Ladson-Billings, “Yes, but how do we do
Writing Enriched requirements.Assignment High- Low- Revision Disciplinary Stakes Stakes Writing Table 1. List of course assginments showing how they meet WE requirements.10. Disciplinary Writing: Programs must provide a brief explanation for what disciplinary writing tends to look like in their field. This explanation can be used in course certification application. The following questions should be considered while completing the application: a) What genres of writing are common practice in the discipline? (Examples: memos; case notes; grants; field study write-ups; etc.) b) Who generates writing in the discipline
. (2018). Educating changemakers: Crossdisciplinary collaboration between a school of engineering and a school of peace. 2018 IEEEFrontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–5.[3] Lord, S. M., Mejia, J. A., Hoople, G., Chen, D., Dalrymple, O., Reddy, E., Przestrzelski, B.,& Choi-Fitzpatrick, A. (2018). Creative Curricula for Changemaking Engineers. 2018 WorldEngineering Education Forum-Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC), 1–5.[4] Lord, Susan M., Olson, R., Roberts, C. A., Baillie, C., Dalrymple, O. O., & Perry, L. A.(2020, June 22). Developing Changemaking Engineers – Year Five. https://peer.asee.org/34427[5] Olson, R., Lord, S., Camacho, M., Huang, M., Perry, L., Przestrzelski, B., & Roberts, C.(2019). Developing Changemaking
videos. Appendix B shows the scores foreach video, per the scoring rubric. Table 1 is the average of all the videos for a given BGC.Data AnalysisAcross all of the clubs, the criteria on which the youth scored the highest included, the project isinexpensive, a description of the final solution is included, and the design challenge is clearlystated. On the lower end of the spectrum were the specification of needed STEM skills (with thelowest score), followed closely by the pitch was clear and engaging, and at least onespecification was provided. In most cases, 64% of the time (or 25 out of 39 videos), the pitchesreceived a four for clearly presenting the design challenge.Table 1 provides the average rubric rating for all club videos for each
students who are minoritized in their programsAbstract:This paper delineates the current status of our study of the experience of shame withinengineering education. The overall study uses interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) toexamine the phenomenon as it presented in individuals (Phases 1.A and 2) and ethnographicmethods to understand the social nature (Phase 1.B) of shame. This paper specifically focuses onPhase 2 of the study examining the experiences of shame in engineering students who areminoritized in their departments. We report on findings of this area of the investigation andbriefly discuss the broader significance related to the context of inclusivity within engineeringeducational space.Introduction:This paper summarizes the
://www.acenet.edu/Documents/Mapping- Internationalizationon-US-Campuses-2012-full.pdf.[3] Open Doors Report, “Number of International Students in the United States Hits All-Time High,” 2019. https://www.iie.org/en/Why-IIE/Announcements/2019/11/Number-of- International-Students-in-the-United-States-Hits-All-Time-High (accessed Dec. 09, 2020).[4] S. B. Twombly, M. H. Salisbury, S. D. Tumanut, and P. Klute, “Special Issue:Study Abroad in a New Global Century: Renewing the Promise, Refining the Purpose,” ASHE Higher Education Report, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1–152, 2012, doi: 10.1002/aehe.20004.[5] K. W. Dean and M. B. Jendzurski, “Using Post-Study-Abroad Experiences to Enhance International Study,” Honors in Practice, vol. 9, pp. 99–111, Jan
stakeholders of the incident are the UCIL and the suppliers of this incident the UCC. ……. Leading to this incident that caused the loss of life and disrupted hundreds of thousands.” • Student B (comment): “In the case of MIC, it was a catastrophic failure which caused many deaths and injuries due to lack of care for their workers and the working environment, but also the negligence of worker safety and machines. ……The absolute disregard for human life with the ill-maintained plant was nothing short of murder committed by those who ran it, and by being so complacent with how they were running the place they ended up killing thousands of people due to something that could have been fixed with proper
access to the same TAs, the sameprofessor, and the same resources.Project Managers: Project managers consisted of upper-level BME students who had previouslytaken and passed Intro to BME with a grade of B or above. During each semester (Fall 2019 andFall 2020), 12 students took the Application in Project Management and Mentorship in BMEcourse. Fall 2019 was conducted face-to-face and Fall 2020 was virtual.Survey: A survey was developed and conducted at the end of each semester. Survey containedquestions about demographics followed by 5-point Likert questions broken down into 3categories, self-efficacy, teamwork, and stress (1=Strongly Disagree to 5=Strongly Agree). 81students (68.6%) and 45 students (56%) responded to the survey in Fall 2019 and
is organized as follows: Section 2 briefly describesthe design procedure and protocol for development of theorigami structure. Section 3 discusses Graphene and CNTstructure. Conductivity of conformal and spiralnanostructure is also discussed in section 4. II. DNA ORIGAMI Building a DNA origami structure starts by designing Fig. 1: Spiral DNA origami object design in CADNanothe desired shape in Cadnano software [27]. Cadnanomakes the sequence designing procedure by allowing B. DNA Origami Protocolusers to create junctions, called crossovers, between DNA structures were synthesized using methoddifferent DNA strands or at different locations of a same proposed by Paul Rothemund [19]. Long ssDNADNA
healing” as presented in Figure 4 to maintain a 100% connecttime. The Cisco 7600/12000 device is connected to the WAN, which is connected to theONS 15454. This will give each City Site connection to the WAN through the DS3connector. 420 Miles 1820 Miles City A City B 255 Users 272 Users 120 Miles City C 49 Users
engineeringeducation during COVID-19 pandemic.” ORMS Today Informs Membership Magazine, 2020.Available: https://pubsonline.informs.org/do/10.1287/orms.2020.06.10/full/[3] Y. Lambrinidou & M. Edwards, “Learning to Listen: An Ethnographic Approach toEngineering Ethics Education,” ASEE, 2013, Paper ID# 8224.[4] E. A. Cech, “Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education?,” Science, Technology, &Human Values, 39(1) , pp. 42-72, 2014.[5] M. F. Young, S. Slota, A. B. Cutter, G. Jalette, G. Mullin, B. Lai, & M. Yukhymenko, “Ourprincess is in another castle: A review of trends in serious gaming for education”. Review ofEducational Research, 82(1), pp. 61-89, 2012.[6] D. G. Johnson, “Can engineering ethics be taught?” Yale University Press Blog, June 4
, UT, June 2004.[6] S. Kaul, C. W. Ferguson, P. M. Yanik, and Y. Yan, “Importance of undergraduate research: Efficacy and student perceptions,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA, June 2016.[7] K. Patsavas and B. S. Caldwell, “Exploring the development of undergraduate research experience,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, June 2014.[8] A. Ieta, R. Manseur, and T. E. Doyle, “Development of an undergraduate research laboratory,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Vancouver, B.C., June 2011.[9] D. G. Dimitriu and J. O’Connor, “Initiation of an undergraduate research program,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual
. Table 1 Assignment 1 – In-class tasks Tasks/Questions Response/Action Results/Methods a) I have no idea a) 0% b) Yes, it is exactly the same Do you think the number of M&Ms in each b) 0% c) Yes, it is same with a bag is the same? c) 50% reasonable difference
, ethical, and economical issues that would beaffected by their projects. Furthermore the project work should be created using principle of theProblem Based and Project Organized Learning with concrete goals and criteria. Fuzzy settheory will inevitably play important role in any problem area that involves natural language. Proceedings of the 2011 North Midwest Section Conference7. References[1] L. B. Kofoed & S. Hansen, Teaching process competences in a PBL curriculum.In: Kolmos, A. et all (eds.)The Aalborg Model: Progress, Diversity and Challenges. Aalborg University Press,2004.[2] L. B. Kofoed & F. Jørgensen, Using Problem Based Learning Methods from Engineering Education in CompanyBased Development. Proceedings
bycolleagues (Amber Diaz Pearson, Stacy Tantum) at Duke University as a part of a larger effort tomeasure ethical awareness. This instrument asked more practical questions around safety, designdecisions, regulations, etc. Thirty questions were sourced from this survey and are found inAppendix B. Students selected a level of agreement using a six-point Likert scale, which rangedfrom strongly disagree to strongly agree. In all, the instrument consisted of 47 multiple choicequestions and took ~10 min to complete. The survey was conducted under the Duke Universityapproved IRB Protocol 2021-0134.We recognize that other changes may be occurring during a student’s first year on campus,although these are factors that cannot be controlled. The Fall 2020
extra credits earned fromcompleting the modules. Therefore, the original final score is the reflection of their overallacademic performance in the course. Based on their original final score, students were assignedletter grades from A+, A, A-, B+, B, B-, C+, C, C-, D+, D, D-, to F. We use the standard cut-offsof 97 / 93 / 90 / 87 / 83 / 80 / 77 / 73 / 70 / 67 / 63 / 60 when assigning letter grades. To simplifyour analysis, students were divided into three groups based on their original final letter grade torepresent three different levels of course performance. Students who had original final lettergrades of A+, A, and A- belong to Group 1; those with original final letter grades of B+, B, andB- belong to Group 2; and the rest (with original
preparation for the oral proficiency exams. The negative skew in the Figure1(b) histogram and the mean quantified value of 2.86 support a moderate increase in studentreported motivation for independence in their work in preparation for the oral proficiency exams.Furthermore, student responses to these two questions are moderately correlated, with a highlysignificant (p-value of 1.91 ´ 10-36) correlation coefficient of 0.635. Thus, students who report anincrease in motivation to achieve a deeper understanding of the material due to the codinginterview intervention are also more likely to report approaching their work with higher levels ofindependence as a result of the oral proficiency exams. The coding interviews
that [11] I.-B. Lee and S. Park, “Improving Tube Design of a Problematic Heat Exchanger for Enhanced Safety at Minimal Costs,” Energies, vol. 10,contribute to power generation from hydrokinetic energy, and p. 1236, 2017.this experiment showed that despite water having a [12] N. A. Saadabad, H. Moradi, and G. Vossoughi, “Semi-active control ofsignificantly lower flow speed, it yielded more power forced oscillations in power transmission lines via optimum tuneablegeneration than air
, Student 6noticed missing representations in their conceptual model. Students 5 and 12 expressed theyadded additional descriptive details to their models like parking lots, arrows, words, andsediment to their second models. While noticing details and context is important to anyengineering design activity, the way in which quality was determined showed that many students(27/39 students for pictorial quality and 23/39 students for numerical quality) did not change inquality. Below we provide the conceptual models of Student 5, shown in Figure 4. (a) Before activity (b) After activity Figure 4: Conceptual models of Student 5Student 5’s conceptual model before the peer comparison
represented in research into the STEM gender gapand is inextricably tied to the creation of science identity [20]. Self efficacy strongly predictsacademic performance, choice of college degree, and persistence along that career path [1], [6],[21].MethodsThis study aimed to collect qualitative data on high school junior and senior girls related to thedevelopment of their STEM identities. I explored the lived experiences of these girls as theydefied gender stereotypes and created a STEM-specific identity, through interviews, focusgroups and observations in a fine-grained, qualitative analysis. Participants who satisfied each ofthe following criteria were sought: a) an 11th-12th grade girl, who b) was actively participating ina STEM club and c
Paper ID #34723Investigating the Effects of CERA on Design Requirement DetailDr. Malena Agyemang, Clemson University Dr. Malena Agyemang is a recent Ph.D. Graduate from Clemson University’s Department of Mechanical Engineering. Her dissertation research focused on how culture is regarded in the development of design requirements. Her research interests lie at the intersection of engineering, human-centered design, devel- opment, and human factors. The goal of Dr. Agyemang’s research is the investigation, development, and improvement of design methodologies, innovative technologies, and systems with cultural, social, and
, M. Hamilton, and S. Adams, “Creativity in Electrical Engineering Degree Programs: Where Is the Content?,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 288–296, 2019. [2] D. V. Kerns, S. E. Kerns, G. A. Pratt, M. H. Somerville, and J. D. Crisman, “The search for design in electrical engineering education,” Proceedings First IEEE International Workshop on Electronic Design, Test and Applications '2002, 2002. [3] J. Rohde, L. Musselman, B. Benedict, D. Verdin, A. Godwin, A. Kirn, L. Benson, and G. Potvin, “Design Experiences, Engineering Identity, and Belongingness in Early Career Electrical and Computer Engineering Students,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 62, no. 3
?Students experience a rhythm of class-homework-class-homework etc. But a flipped class musthave class-homework-prep-class-homework-prep etc. Students ask, “What’s my homework?”Teachers answer, you need to do these problems AND this prep before the next class.A course designed around days obscures the need to do both the homework problems and thepreparation for the next day. For example, does the preparation for Day 6 go with Day 5 or Day6? If it’s with Day 5, the preparation material is hard to find when reviewing Day 6 material. Butif it’s with Day 6, it doesn’t look like homework to do on Day 5. Appendix B shows apreliminary sketch from the team showing the learning objects with various break points.We decided to leave the prep work with the day
power) switches [4], this scheme, including the mechanical drivetrain, provides the operator vehicular control. Cart automation begins with implementing servo motors on top of the mechanical system to mimic operator input. Each system is shown below in Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Battery Bank; (b) Pedal Assembly; (c) RWD 48V DC Motor; and (d) MCOR4. Previous student researchers implemented a basic steering and braking system using servo motors. The “Teknic ClearPath - Integrated Servo System” [5] is utilized for replicating aforementioned user inputs to brake and steer the cart. SDSK step and direction model variations provide torque, power, and programmability aspects
adjust to the distance learning mode include: a) decomposition of the course context into three modules and clear specification of the corresponding learning objectives of each module; b) combination of different technologies to create friendly and inclusive learning environment; c) frequent assessment of students' performance via online quizzes/tests; and d) carefully- designed laboratory assignments via MATLAB simulations that are able to demonstrate the entire feedback control process. A comparison of students' performance under the traditional face-to-face learning mode and the new distance learning mode is conducted. Based on assessment results, we will evaluate the effectiveness of our current teaching methodology/plan developed
asked to reflect on their experiences using the followingquestion:How often have you been in courses where some educational technology tools, especiallymobile applications, have been used? Tell us something about your experience. a. Please state the name of the application(s) or other technology tools (e.g., Clicker, CATME, Socrative, Any quiz software, etc.). b. What you liked about that application(s) and why? c. What you didn’t like and why? d. Were those applications academically relevant? If yes, why, if no, why not?Data AnalysisThe study focuses on exploring the students’ perceptions of using educational technology toolsin postsecondary STEM classrooms. To inform our study, we employed