with and persuade others of theirdesign choices, often balancing a variety of concerns such as political issues, economicconstraints, technological limitations and environmental concerns. This involves justifyingtradeoffs and prioritizing different aspects, a hallmark of argumentation. In addition, engineeringresearch requires significant evidence-based argumentation for new designs to be accepted andfor the adoption of innovative practices. As such, argumentation is deeply embedded into theinformal and formal practices of professional engineers.The Role of Arguments and Argumentation in Engineering EducationArgumentation theory has been used in science and mathematics education research over the pastfew decades but has been largely
. Oliveira is an ABET evaluator, and serve as panelist for NSF projects. Dr. Oliveira has also been contributing to several STEM K-12 outreach initiatives, and to the NSF-ADVANCE initiative at Michigan Technological University. Dr. Oliveira is a member of the IEEE Photonics Society, the IEEE Women in Engineering Society, and the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE). Page 15.670.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 IMPACTING STUDENTS’ INTEREST IN STEM FIELDS: AN ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION COURSE FOR K-12 UNDERREPRESENTED STUDENTSAbstractA growing demand for
: Design characteristics of a graduate synchronous online program. Journal of Education for Library Science, 54(2), 147-161.[7] Park, J. H. & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Educational Technology and Society, 12, 207–217.[8] Steinman, D. (2007). Educational Experiences and the Online Student. TechTrends, 51, 46–52.[9] Willging, P.A., & Johnson, S. D. (2004). Factors that influence students’ decision to drop out of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13, 115–127.[10] Smith, K. A. (2011, October). Cooperative learning: Lessons and insights from thirty years of championing a research-based innovative practice. In Frontiers in
training. We leaned upon the expertise of on-campus resources including the Center forInclusion and Diversity (CCID) [28] and the Center for Teaching, Learning, and Outreach(CTLO) [29] to develop best practices for both the speaker and facilitator sides of the project.Our facilitator search consisted of independent research that we conducted to find speakers at ourinstitution and other schools with relevant expertise, as well as a survey sent to the departmentsoliciting speaker suggestions. The latter effort did not yield many recommendations and most ofthe speakers came from our research. We primarily found speakers based on their published workor lectures we found online, but other approaches included making use of our school’s alumninetwork and
Content Access, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Feb. 06, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/a-leadership-development-ecosystem-for-engineering-graduate- students[7] R. Paul and L. G. C. Falls, “Engineering Leadership Education: A Review of Best Practices,” presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2015, p. 26.634.1-26.634.11. Accessed: Feb. 06, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/engineering-leadership-education-a-review-of-best-practices[8] H. Yu and J. Zhu, “The Design and Implementation of Engineering Leadership Programs: A Comparative Study,” presented at the 2016 ASEE International Forum, Jun. 2016. Accessed: Feb. 06, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/the-design
Women’s Pursuit of Academic Careers through Knowledge and NetworkingAbstractThe under-representation of women and U.S. ethnic minorities in science, technology,mathematics, and engineering (STEM) is a well established fact. There are numerous studiesthat disclose reasons for this under-representation at all steps along the academic process. Inresponse to this research and in the interest of bridging the Ph.D. and postdoctoral scholar stepsinto an academic career, the Cockrell School of Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin,the George R. Brown School of Engineering at Rice University, and the Wiess School of NaturalSciences at Rice University in Houston, Texas have designed and hosted workshops sinceOctober 2004 entitled
%Completion of a minor in social science or humanities field 38%Extracurricular group or design competition group 35%Research or independent project 34%Internship 27%Study abroad 21%Differences were also noted for “explorer” and “non explorer” career paths. Explorers chose fulltime work, whether directly or directly in engineering fields, over graduate school just aftergraduation: 49% of explorers chose work versus 39% of non explorers; 43% of explorers chosegraduate school versus 53% of non explorers. Table 6 summarizes career results for each group.Explorers (N=161) were asked if they had a
mentoring, and our research questions are as follows: 1. How does the formalized and on-the-job training benefit the EGSMs during their tenure as a mentor and beyond? 2. What learning outcomes are enhanced or developed for the mentors through the EGSM program? 3. How does the EGSM program impact the teaching practices, mentoring, and career direction of participants?The survey was adapted from Meizlish and Wright20 and included (a) questions about careerchoices, with respondents in academia providing information about their institutional context andpostsecondary teaching experiences and graduate students sharing their potential career choices;(b) items associated with the value of the GSM training and what they learned
? How do they move from one idea toanother? Research in psychology has shown that decision-making often relies on simplifiedcognitive heuristics. Heuristics are reasoning processes that do not guarantee the best solution,but often lead to potential solutions by providing a “short-cut” within cognitive processing1.Using a case-study framework, this research identified and categorized types of heuristicsengineers used to explore potential designs solutions. Using a think-aloud protocol, fiveengineers with varying levels of experience were asked to develop conceptual designs for asolar-powered cooking device that was inexpensive, portable, and suitable for family use.Following the think-aloud session, the engineers participated in a retrospective
math students. This program is similar to the REHAMS and BIOS inthat high school students are exposed to university activities and research, attend academicworkshops and reside on campus. Preliminary data on the impact of this program has not beenreleased.SEHS Program Details Based on current and historical trends, the need to be proactive to recruit and retainstudents into traditional science and engineering fields has substantially increased. The SEHSpilot program was designed to provide hands-on learning experiences in research and advancedtechnologies for high school students and teachers. Training the teachers in this unique way alsoprovided a support system for students and a resource at the school. These
framework for quantifying simulateddesign problem complexity, we present a metric of complexity, tractability 𝑻, supported by datafrom real student work on a simulated engineering design problem.TheoryEngineering Design EducationDesign is a critical part of the engineering profession [1], [2]. As a result, design is a centralfocus of engineering education in terms of teaching, learning, and assessment [3], [4]. In a recentstudy, Sheppard and others [5] interviewed faculty and students about the field of engineeringand concluded that design is the most critical component of engineering education. One facultymember asserted that “guiding students to learn ‘design thinking’ and the design process, socentral to professional practice, is the
theories • Analyze organizational environment • Define organizational structure • Analyze organizational culture • Understand strengths and weaknesses of alternative organization structures • Understand the role of teams in organization design • Understand the organizational decision-making processes • Understand the role played by technology in organizations • Become aware of contemporary views of best practice in organizations • Work as a team to explore, analyze and understand selected issues closely related to their professional interests in organizational setting.The course intent was to focus on the problems and challenges faced by middle-managers indealing with the industrial organization (enterprise) as a
supported by the National Science Foundation include interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a National Science Foun- dation CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios for graduate students to promote professional identity and reflective practice. Her teaching emphasizes the roles of engineers as communicators and educators, the foundations and evolution of the engineering education discipline, assessment methods, and evaluating communication in engineering. Page 23.647.1 c American Society for
More than that, it connects students directly to business and industry.This business and industrial alliance includes partners in all aspects of industry. In the buildingsystems design aspect it includes: HDR, DLR, Alvine Associates, Peter Kiewit and Sons,Kirkham Michael, and various other engineering-based firms. These members provide studentsand faculty with resources that include in-class lectures on practical applications of designslearned in the classroom, internship opportunities to students, and funding for research andstudent support to pursue advanced degrees. Working closely with these partners contributes tothe further development of the students’ abilities to function effectively in their chosen
prepare the TAs for thesetasks.This paper describes an informal, experiential TA training seminar that provides new TAs withinstruction from a knowledgeable faculty member paired with an experienced TA. The first partof the paper discusses how the session is designed to equip TA’s with skills and confidence inteaching, working with students in office hours, grading and dealing with a variety of otherchallenges they are likely to face. The second part outlines how to make the training sessionactive, informal and effective. Pairing a faculty member with a TA is a critical component of theworkshop design. Participant evaluations and informal feedback suggest that new TAs are moreinclined to ask questions of someone close to their developmental level
America’stechnology competitiveness, but if engineering graduate education has anything at all to do with thedevelopment of our creative intellectual capital, responsible for the engineering advancements of newtechnological developments and innovations, then the present health of U.S. engineering graduateeducation itself must be included as a major contributing factor in the loss of US competitiveness.1.4 Technology Matters The Changing Practice of Engineering for Systematic Technology InnovationThe assumption that federally funded basic scientific research (performed at the nation’s researchuniversities) is the principal generator of US technology for economic growth and national security hasbeen fundamental to U.S. science policy since the end of World
national educationalservices on a regular basis. For twelve consecutive years ISU has been ranked by PrincetonReview to be among the ‘Best in the Midwest’ [9], and in 2015 ISU was listed to be amongnation's ‘Best Value Colleges’ [10] by the same organization. The predecessor program of MET,mechanical design technology had been offering degrees and producing quality graduates since1978. This program was academically strong and had been continuously accredited by NationalAssociation of Industrial Technology (Presently Association of Management, Technology andApplied Engineering) with no major deficiencies. In 2008 COT applied for an ABETaccreditation for the MET program and the accreditation was granted in fall 2009. Sincelaunching the MET program
Paper ID #38391Examining Faculty and Graduate Student Attitudes on Stressand Mental HealthDavid Feil-seifer David Feil-Seifer is an Associate Professor in Computer Science at the University of Nevada, Reno. His primary research interests are Socially Assistive Robotics (SAR) and User Interface design for Unmanned Autonomous Systems (UAS-UI). His research is motivated by the potential for SAR to address health-care crises that stem from a lack of qualified care professionals for an ever-growing population in need of personalized care as well as the uses for aerial robots for disaster mitigation. Prior to his
&M University. She earned her PhD in industrial-organizational psychology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Her research interests include workplace safety, occupa- tional health, and fairness and mistreatment in the workplace and in STEM classrooms and programs.David Christopher SeetsEmma Edoga, Texas A&M UniversityLuis Angel RodriguezGuillermo Aguilar, Texas A&M University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Evidence Based Practice: Innovation training and its impact on faculty approach to curricular or pedagogical changesIntroductionThe Project called Teams for Creating Opportunities for Revolutionizing the Preparation ofStudents (TCORPS), is
College of Engineering. The Engineering Education Transformations Institute at UGA is an innovative approach that fuses high quality engineering education research with systematic educational innovation to transform the educational practices and cultures of engineering. Dr. Walther’s research group, the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), is a dynamic in- terdisciplinary team that brings together professors, graduate, and undergraduate students from engineer- ing, art, educational psychology, and social work in the context of fundamental educational research. Dr. Walther’s research program spans interpretive research methodologies in engineering
university-based entrepreneurship and innovation programs. Brent’s expertise also includes the design and leadership of impactful collegiate engagement programs for universal learners.Mr. Eric Prosser, Arizona State University Eric Prosser is the Engineering and Entrepreneurship Librarian with the ASU Library. Eric is the liaison to the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering and provides research services for faculty, graduate students, and undergraduate students along with instruction in critical analysis and information literacy, including the legal and ethical use of information. Eric has a Bachelor of Science in Physics from Harvey Mudd College, a Master of Information Resources and Library Science from the University
and Computer Engineering at Iowa State University, Ames, where he has been since 2008. His research interests are in adaptive computing systems, reconfigurable hardware, embedded systems, and hardware architectures for application specific acceleration. Jones received Intel Corporation sponsored Graduate Engineering Minority (GEM) Fellowships from 1999-2000 and from 2003-2004. He received the best paper award from the IEEE International Conference on VLSI Design in 2007. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Designing a Course Together: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Study of a Cross-Functional Team Course Design Project in EngineeringThis work-in-progress research paper
the context of youth leadership programs, start-ups and innovation centers, and community-based initiatives. She is currently a Design Research Fellow and Lecturer at Olin College, with a focus on processes and frameworks for transformation in engineering education. Previously, she developed and launched the Energy Technology Program at Creighton University: an interdisciplinary undergraduate program in renewable energy and sustainable design. She has a B.S. in Mechanical Engi- neering from Olin College and an M.A. from Creighton University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Conversation and participation architectures: practices for creating
AC 2012-5183: EASING INTO ENGINEERING EDUCATION: AN ORIEN-TATION PROGRAM FOR GRADUATE STUDENTSStephanie Cutler, Virginia TechWalter Curtis Lee Jr., Virginia Tech Walter Lee is a Graduate Assistant and doctoral student in engineering education at Virginia Tech. His pri- mary research interests focus on diversity and student retention. He earned a B.S. in industrial engineering from Clemson University.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa McNair is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research includes interdisciplinary collaboration, communication studies, identity theory, and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include
Paper ID #9563K-12 Pedagogical Tunable ModulesAndres Cornel Chavez, California State University Northridge Andres C. Chavez was born November 24, 1989 in Panorama City, CA. As an undergraduate he attended California State University Northridge (CSUN) where he double majored in Mechanical Engineering and Mathematics and graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree in May 2012. Currently, Andres is pursuing a Master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering at CSUN where his research focus is on smart materials and engineering education. A design stemming from his educational research has been field tested and should be
directly addressed needs she had identified in her industry experience and her plansfollowing her PhD directly related to the outcomes of her research work2. For those returnerswho decide to return to a position outside of academia in industry or government aftercompleting their PhD, their past experience likely enables them to advance in their careers morerapidly to higher positions with greater impact than their direct-pathway peers are able to do. Inaddition to returners’ rich work experience, they represent a largely untapped source of potentialengineering graduate students. The National Science Foundation has called for additionalpathways to and through advanced engineering programs5. Engineers with advanced training arecrucial for success in
data is the importance of offering widely varying supportservices and inter-departmental collaboration to combine the strengths of all parties involved.References1. M. Hock, et al. (2014). Tutoring Programs for Academically Underprepared College Students: A Review of the Literature. Journal of College Reading and Learning. 29. 101-122. 10.1080/10790195.1999.10850073.2. D. Xu, et al. “EASEing Students Into College: The Impact of Multidimensional Support for Underprepared Students.” Educational Researcher, vol. 47, no. 7, Oct. 2018, pp. 435–450, doi:10.3102/0013189X18778559.3. M. Estrada, et al. "Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM." CBE—Life Sciences Education15.3 (2016): es5.4. C. A
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 You’re Hired! Changing Students’ Attitudes Towards Engineering (Research to Practice) Strand: K-12 Engineering Resources: Best Practices in Curriculum DesignAbstract With the growing need for qualified employees in STEM-based careers, it is critical to developactivities for middle and high school students to increase their awareness of opportunities inthese areas. With proper design, increasing awareness of STEM-based careers in conjunctionwith overcoming current stereotypes can lead to a change in attitudes towards these variouscareers. Researchers at North Dakota State College of Science, along with
Paper ID #41554Board 398: Sustaining and Scaling the Impact of the MIDFIELD Project atthe American Society for Engineering Education (Year 2)Dr. Susan M Lord, University of San Diego Susan Lord is Professor and Chair of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. She received a BS from Cornell University in Materials Science and Electrical Engineering (EE) and MS and PhD in EE from Stanford University. Her research focuses on the study and promotion of equity in engineering including student pathways and inclusive teaching. She has won best paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education, IEEE
it had the unfortunate impact thatassignment questions with more scope for students to make decisions were shifted later in theterm as this type of question is much easier to write for functions than for arrays. This also meantthat students had less practice with programming questions requiring the use of their judgement.The course project in MTE121 was scaled back significantly, becoming closer to a two partassignment rather than an open-ended design project. Accordingly, the weighting of theassignments and projects changed in the course syllabus (assignments increased from 10% to19% in 2020, and the project decreased from 15% to 6% in 2020)2.2.2 AssignmentsThe most significant change to the weekly assignments for 2020 was the shift away