laws of nature. This kind of knowledge underlies technological development and product and process advances in most industries. The production and reproduction of know-why is often organized in specialized organizations, such as research laboratories and universities. To get access to this kind of knowledge, firms have to interact with these organizations either through recruiting scientifically-trained labour or directly through contacts and joint activities. ◊ Know-how refers to skills or the capability to do something. Businessmen judging market prospects for a new product or a personnel manager selecting and training staff have to use
credits each semester. The credit structureis designed to encourage long-term participation, and allows multi-year projects of significantscope and impact to be undertaken by the teams.Each student in the EPICS Program attends a weekly two-hour meeting of his/her team in theEPICS laboratory. During this laboratory time the team members will take care ofadministrative matters, do project planning and tracking, and work on their project. All studentsalso attend a common one-hour lecture each week. A majority of the lectures are by guestexperts, and have covered a wide range of topics related to engineering design, communication,and community service. The long-term nature of the program has required some innovation inthe lecture series since
(s) is completed and delivered, new projects are identified by the team andcommunity partner allowing the team to continue to work with the same community partner formany years. Each undergraduate student may earn academic credit for several semesters,registering for the course for 1 or 2 credits each semester. The credit structure is designed toencourage long-term participation, and grants multi-year projects of significant scope and impactto be undertaken by the teams.Each student in the EPICS Program attends a weekly two-hour meeting of his/her team in theEPICS laboratory. During this laboratory time the team members will take care ofadministrative matters, do project planning and tracking, and work on their project. All studentsalso
industry as well.This paper will describe the scope and layout of this class, student projects, and the equipmentused, associated costs of running a laboratory and lessons learned as well as the impact on otherfaculty, departments and local industry.Course OverviewMETBD 410 (Rapid Prototyping, a technical elective) has the following Goals/Objectives:1. Understand the advantages and disadvantages of different additive processes currently on the market.2. Reverse engineer a product by digitizing geometry, importing the data into Pro/ENGINEER and creating a solid model from surfaces.3. Build the model (Objective 2) on the Z-402 3-D printer and re-digitize the prototype using a non-contact scanner to verify the geometry
Laboratory Green Engineering Experiments Heat and Mass IntegrationDesign for Pollution Prevention Process AnalysisSenior Engineering Clinic/Senior Project Real Industrial Projects in Green Engineering Page 10.605.5 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationGreen Engineering ModulesThe following sections give examples from courses that have been developed for various coursesby the
computer laboratory. TheSchool of Construction is one of the few programs at ASU that has its own computer laboratoryconveniently located in the same building where the core courses are taught. The laboratoryconsists of 31 Pentium III personal computers. The laboratory also has a ceiling mounted dataprojector that can be used for demonstrations. The school has two portable presentation stationsthat consist of a Pentium notebook and a data projector. The computer hardware in the laboratorysupports numerous general purpose and construction industry specific software. These computerhardware and software resources are in addition to the college and university wide infrastructure
of 120 students) ofPhysics for the Modern World were offered. The 2 lecture sections were broken into 8 laboratorysections, with an average of 16 students in each lab. One of the 8 laboratory sections (a sectionconsisting of 7 students) was linked with one section of college writing (Composing the PhysicalWorld). Although Physics for the Modern World typically consists of freshman through seniors,all students enrolled in the linked courses were freshman - the College Writing class is amandatory requirement for all American University students, and the logical plan is for students tocomplete College Writing during their freshman year. A description of the curricular toolsdeveloped to link Physics for the Modern World and Composing the
Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationBibliography1. Cotton, Kathleen and Wikelund, Karen Reed, “Educational Time Factors”, Close-Up #8, Research You Can Use, School Improvement Research Series (SIRS), Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, 2001, http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/4/cu8.html.2. Anderson, L. "Student Involvement in Learning and School Achievement." CALIFORNIA JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH 26 (1975): 53-62.3. Anderson, L. "Policy Implications of Research on School Time." THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATOR 40 (1983): 25-28.4. Borg, W.R. "Time and School Learning." In TIME TO LEARN, edited by C. Denham and A. Lieberman
Overview and Problem IdentificationWe assessed the cognitive style and learning preferences of students enrolled in Introduction toEnvironmental Engineering (CE334) at UW-Platteville. This course is required of all Civil andEnvironmental Engineering students, and contains three 1-hour lectures and one 2-hourlaboratory period per week. Dr. Parker taught the two laboratory sections during the period ofthis study. The course contained 44 juniors and seniors, and included students who enrolled attheir first opportunity and students who put it off until their final semester.Engineering students at UW-P who have made it through the challenging calculus, physics, andchemistry requirements (such as those enrolled in CE334) appear in general to be more
EducationThere is an interesting trend with respect to copying. 96.8 % of students believe that copyingfrom another student during an exam is cheating. This number drops to 72.0 % for copyinghomework from another student, 59.1 % for copying laboratory reports from previous terms,49.3 % for copying homework from previous terms, and 17.9 % for copying passages out of thetextbook. There is a corresponding increase in students who thought these acts were unethicalbut not cheating. Exams, laboratory reports, and homework are all methods of assessing studentperformance in a class and all play a role in the final grade, yet students are obviously making adistinction between them. In most classes, exams weigh more heavily towards the final grade thanlaboratory
education in avariety of ways. Many of the graduate students are teaching assistants assigned toundergraduate laboratories where they instruct students on conducting experiments,oversee the lab work, answer students’ questions, check engineering notebooks, andreview or grade lab reports. In some departments or courses, the TAs have lessresponsibility; in some cases, an experienced graduate student may teach a lab courseunder minimal supervision by engineering faculty. Regardless of their particularassignments, teaching assistants have a significant role in the educational mission of theinstitution.Because teaching assistants have an impact on the quality of undergraduate research andinstruction, engineering educators, like their counterparts in
questions developed by the IPPDteams in previous years.DOD projectsThe US Air Force, via Wright Laboratory at Eglin Air Force Base, has funded a series ofprojects. They are motivated to participate for a wide variety of reasons including a desire tobuild a stronger tie to the University, getting a fresh perspective on problems, recruit students to Page 7.826.8work at the laboratory, and be a “good citizen” by supporting higher education within the State.“Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Education
Society for Engineering Education, 2024The Qualtrics survey contained the IRB consent form, descriptive demographics, comfortabilitywith public speaking and VR, and other measurements for associated research projects (seeauthors). Students were contacted with a follow-up email within a 72-hour timeframe askingthem to identify a VR presentation practice date and time (prior to their class presentation). Aftersigning up, students provided researchers with any speaker notes and/or PowerPoint slides toupload for the VR simulation. Instructors offered varying compensation for participation whichmay have influenced attrition.After arriving at the laboratory, participants reaffirmed IRB consent. Prior to entering the VRsimulation, participants completed
PhD in 2000, Page 24.868.4Dr. Seybold took a position with Cal Tech / NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) inCalifornia. During the period from 1993 to 1999, TSGC handled the agenda, application processand logistics while LPI handled the production of learning materials, speakers, and tours. Whena full-time Education and Outreach Coordinator (the first author) was hired at TSGC, a LiftOffplanning committee was formed and the program became much more tightly structured.Members of the committee include NASA engineers, NASA education staff, former participants,space industry staff, and TSGC staff.Initially, our focus was on providing teachers with
material with the students.(2)There are several strands of pedagogies of engagement under the umbrella of active learningmethods that have received attention by engineering educators world-wide. (2, 3) For many Page 24.949.2faculty, there remain questions about what “active learning” is and how it differs from traditionalengineering education, since the latter involves activities through homework assignment,laboratories, and, often, group projects. Adding to the confusion, engineering faculty do notalways understand how the common forms of “active learning” differ from each other and mostare not inclined to search for answers. Of the most known and
. Page 24.1035.14[6] Brooks Jr, F. P. (2010). The design of design: Essays from a computer scientist. Pearson Education.[7] Martin, R. (2009). The design of business. Harvard Business School Publishing, Massachusetts.[8] Visser, W. (2006). The cognitive artifacts of designing.[9] Ho, C. H. (2001). Some phenomena of problem decomposition strategy for design thinking: differences between novices and experts. Design Studies, 22(1), 27-45.[10] Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: an overview. Design studies, 25(5), 427-441.[11] ICAM Architecture Part II-Volume IV - Function Modeling Manual (IDEF0), AFWAL-TR-81-4023, Materials Laboratory, Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, Air Force Systems Command, Wright-Patterson Air Force
is the critique phase of SBLwherein the Evaluation (Evaluate) level of the taxonomy is clearly invoked. This aspect oflearning is not incorporated in many active learning procedures but clearly is an essential part ofSBL.A drawback to the implementation of SBL in a traditional class is that it is time-intensive. Asthe title suggests, this technique has most frequently been used in studio-based classes. The classtime allotted for studio sessions is more typical of that for a laboratory class in engineering—twoto three hours. So while the SBL approach might work in a class for which an extendedrecitation section is part of the class, the time constraints inherent in a typical one-hour classwould seem to be a large impediment to using SBL. With
also follow theproject based approach in teaching leadership to engineering students ((Khattak et al., 2012).Penn State’s (USA) Engineering Leadership Development Minor (EDLM) is a slightly differentmodel than any project based leadership model used in laboratories. The EDLM Model requiresstudents to take multiple courses in leadership focusing on core leadership qualities, globalleadership qualities, and 21st century leadership qualities (Schuhmann, 2011). Similarly,Babucia, Craig, and Connor (2012) discuss MIT satellite development program projects whichprovide students with the leadership education through a project based approach. The MITprogram is a three-term class focusing on engineering topics and developed for implementationat
Paper ID #9006The Purdue Mechanics Freeform Classroom: A New Approach to Engineer-ing Mechanics EducationProf. Jeffrey F Rhoads, Purdue University, West Lafayette Jeffrey F. Rhoads is an Associate Professor in the School of Mechanical Engineering at Purdue Univer- sity and is affiliated with both the Birck Nanotechnology Center and Ray W. Herrick Laboratories at the same institution. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees, each in mechanical engineering, from Michigan State University in 2002, 2004, and 2007, respectively. Dr. Rhoads’ current research inter- ests include the predictive design, analysis, and
Internationalization Efforts at Villanova UniversityAbstractIn 2012, Villanova University joined the American Council of Education (ACE) as a member oftheir Internationalization Laboratory. The goal of joining this laboratory was to develop astrategic plan for comprehensive internationalization that will help strengthen the university’sglobal leadership and engagement. ACE describes a process to develop, implement, and monitoran internationalization plan. This paper will describe the status of current internationalizationactivities at the university; specifically focusing on how the Department of Civil andEnvironmental Engineering can help the university articulate, assess, and attain theirinternationalization goals. This
areas of recruitment and retention. A SWE and ASEE Fellow, she is a frequent speaker on career opportunities and diversity in engineering.Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez, Arizona State University Prior to joining the ASU Electrical Engineering faculty in 1990, Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez worked at MIT, IBM, AT&T Bell Laboratories and Raytheon Missile Systems. He has also consulted for Eglin Air Force Base, Boeing Defense and Space Systems, Honeywell and NASA. He has published over 200 technical papers in refereed journals and conference proceedings–over 60 with students. He has authored three engineering texts on classical controls, linear systems, and multi-variable control. Dr. Rodriguez has given over 70 invited
://www.usfirst.org/aboutus/gracious-professionalism Accessed: 5/17/2012.12. Williams, A. B., 2003, "The qualitative impact of using LEGO MINDSTORMS robots to teach computer engineering," IEEE Transactions on Education, v. 46, n. 1, Feb. 2003, p. 206.13. J. Hatfield, D. Scott, D. Szmyd, “A freshman electrical engineering course and laboratory for all engineering majors,” ASEE- IEEE Frontier in Education Conference Proceedings, pp. 4c2.1-4c2.4, Vol.2, 1995.14. Makarov, S., Ludwig, R., Win, K.M., “Basic Class Materials and Laboratory Projects With DC Motors in an Introductory Undergraduate ECE Class for Non-Majors,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, AC 2011-1184, 2011
Data Acquisition Systems for the CGA Plasma LabAbstract: This paper reports on the results of an educational collaboration between Physics andElectrical Engineering faculty at US Coast Guard Academy (CGA), to advise a senior capstoneproject. The Physics faculty is constructing a research grade plasma laboratory as a nexus forProject Based Learning (PBL), the development of magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) physicstheory applications to support organization missions, and investigations into plasma physicsexperiments that are vital to today’s scientific challenges. The collaborative project was designedto setup an electronic system for the lab’s command, control, and data collection from threeplasma experiments being developed in house.Two Electrical
of mathematics andengineering science, accompanied by laboratory and workshop experiences. The formative yearsshould be devoted to individual learning, followed by team activities and peer group interactions,and then immersion in creativity and innovation in the workplace, e.g. research participation.Some global trends are evident in engineering education over the past two decades: Page 23.1174.31. Global adoption6,7,8,9 of the ABET2000 model of self-assessment processes as the basis for accreditation of undergraduate programs, where showing “improvement” replaces standards.2. Uncritical adoption of the US K-12 model of teaching
, requiring a level of background information tobe taught at the beginning. Similarly, the applicants selected are those they have a pre-existinginterest in engineering and a desire to learn more about the topic. To that end, the module shouldbe implemented in settings involving a pool of students with diverse interests so as to better gageits effectiveness.By implementing the modules twice, slight revisions and improvements to the material andactivities were made. In general though, the content remained constant from 2011 to 2012. Thefollowing module-specific lessons learned are discussed in detail.Liquefaction ModuleStudents were actively engaged in the lecture sections, the laboratory experiments, and the dataanalysis. They seemed to understand
the areas of recruitment and retention. A SWE and ASEE Fellow, she is a frequent speaker on career opportunities and diversity in engineering.Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez, Arizona State University Prior to joining the ASU Electrical Engineering faculty in 1990, Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez worked at MIT, IBM, AT&T Bell Laboratories and Raytheon Missile Systems. He has also consulted for Eglin Air Force Base, Boeing Defense and Space Systems, Honeywell and NASA. He has published over 200 tech- nical papers in refereed journals and conference proceedings – over 60 with students. He has authored three engineering texts on classical controls, linear systems, and multivariable control. Dr. Rodriguez has given over 70
recognize thatnew ways of thinking and being will likely come from outside the academy and not from withinit [42]. Already, we have found commonality with and taken inspiration from education andresearch exemplars such as the Zapatista movement’s Escuelas Populares [47], the Science Shopmovement [48], Highlander Education and Research Center [21], and the Civic Laboratory forEnvironmental Action Research (CLEAR) [49]. Our goal is to define a set of practices, based onthe methods of these and other successful experiences, in order to help us manifest SE in theworld. As we share our stories, support one another through our weekly trials and triumphs, andparticipate in our own liberatory praxis, we become community to one another. We start to liveout
- engineering-ethics[7] K. V. Treuren and S. Eisenbarth, “An Evaluation Of Humanities And Social Science Requirements In An Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum,” presented at the 2005 Annual Conference, Jun. 2005, p. 10.164.1-10.164.11. Accessed: Jul. 19, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/an-evaluation-of-humanities-and-social-science- requirements-in-an-undergraduate-engineering-curriculum[8] “Cat on a Hot Tin Roof.” https://www.playbillder.com/show/vip/South_Bend_Civic_Theatre/2015/Cat_on_a_Hot_Ti n_Roof_16401/page/15 (accessed Jul. 15, 2023).[9] A. Berry, P. Mulhall, R. Gunstone, and J. Loughran, “Helping students learn from laboratory work,” Aust. Sci. Teach. J., vol. 45, no. 1, p
, engineeringeducation1 IntroductionMicrofluidics is a versatile research tool for a wide variety of scientific and engineering disciplines[1,2]. Microfluidic devices manipulate fluids using channels with height or width at a micro- or © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conferencesub-millimeter scale. One of the most striking and promising applications of microfluidics is tocreate lab-on-a-chip (LoC) environments in which full laboratory-scale procedures can occur on afootprint smaller than a notecard. LoC devices can be used for detecting and manipulating specifictypes of cells, creating point-of-care diagnostic devices, and developing drugs [3,4