Paper ID #243652018 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Spring Conference: Washington, District ofColumbia Apr 6Analysis of the Low Rate of Denial of Service Attacks Detection by Using Sta-tistical Fisher MethodsMr. Yasser R Salem, University of the District of ColumbiaDr. Paul Cotae, University of the District of Columbia Dr. Paul Cotae,Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering has more than 25 years of experience in the communication field (research and education). He received a Dipl. Ing. and a M.S. degrees in com- munication and electronic engineering in 1980 from the Technical University of Iassy and a Ph.D. degree in
Paper ID #22439Flipped Classroom and Emotional Learning in an Engineering LeadershipDevelopment CourseDr. Dean H. Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Lang is the Associate Director of the Engineering Leadership Research Program at Penn State Uni- versity. She holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering from West Virginia University, an MBA from Johns Hopkins University, and a PhD in Kinesiology with a focus on Biomechanics from Penn State University. Dr. Lang’s previous professional experiences and research interests range from mechanical engineering facilities design to research that applied engineering
Soc Interface. 2006;3(8):399-413. doi:10.1098/rsif.2005.0102.17. Rentenbach B, Prislovsky L, Gabriel R. Valuing differences:: Neurodiversity in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan. 2017;98(8):59-63. doi:10.1177/0031721717708297.18. Armstrong T. The Myth of the Normal Brain: Embracing Neurodiversity. AMA J Ethics. 2015;17(4):348-352. doi:10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.4.msoc1-1504.19. Passow HJ, Passow CH. What Competencies Should Undergraduate Engineering Programs Emphasize? A Systematic Review. J Eng Educ. 2017;106(3):475-526. doi:10.1002/jee.20171.20. Cropley DH. Promoting creativity and innovation in engineering education. Psychol Aesthetics, Creat Arts. 2015;9(2):161-171. doi:10.1037/aca0000008.21. Sparks
educators with strategies to connectstudents’ real-world experiences to classroom content and structure [1]. As this research isadvanced, the implications of this work can help to strengthen our understanding of Blackyouths’ engineering learning ecosystems [1], which is partly influenced by their community,culture, educational policy, formal learning contexts, and informal learning experiences.AcknowledgementsWe would like to acknowledge the store managers and museum directors for their support of ourexploratory work.References[1] The Noyce Foundation (2015), The Power of Explanation: Reframing STEM and Informal Learning[2] Nelson, I., & Gastic, B. (2009). Street Ball, Swim Team and the Sour Cream Machine: A ClusterAnalysis of Out of School
practice.AcknowledgementThis material is based on work supported by The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley CharitableTrust through funding of the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education(CPREE), a collaboration of twelve educational institutions http://cpree.uw.edu.References[1] J. Dewey, How We Think. San Bernardino, CA: Renaissance Classics, 2012 (reprint of 1910 original).[2] J. A. Moon, Reflection in learning and professional development: Theory and practice. London, England: Routledge Falmer, 1999.[3] E. Rose, On reflection: An essay on technology, education, and the status of thought in the Twenty-first century. Toronto, Canada: Canadian Scholar’s Press Inc., 2013.[4] D. A. Schön, D. A., The reflective practitioner: How professionals
contributing tocommunity as predictors (see Figure 1). Based on the results of that analysis, both predictorsappeared to reach marginal statistical significance, such that working on a non-service projects(B = -0.19, t = -1.97, p = 0.05) and reporting a higher value for contributing to their community(B = 0.22, t = 1.93, p = 0.06) predicted higher perceived value of students’ capstone project.Although the interaction of the two predictors failed to reach statistical significance (B = 0.14, t= 1.22, p = 0.23), the trend suggested that for participants completing service-focused capstoneprojects, those who were less concerned about contributing to the community did not feel theircapstone project was valuable; however, this interaction
.[3] M. D. Koretsky, “Program Level Curriculum Reform at Scale: Using Studios to Flip the Classroom,” Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 47-57, 2015.[4] R. A. Lotan, “Group-worthy tasks,” Educational Leadership, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 72-75, 2013.[5] B. Barron, and L. Darling-Hammond, “Teaching for meaningful learning: A review of research on inquiry-based and cooperative learning,” Powerful Learning: What We Know about Teaching for Understanding. pp. 11-70, 2008.[6] L. Deslauriers, E. Schelew, and C. Wieman, “Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class,” Science, vol. 332, no. 6031, pp. 862-864, 2011.[7] D. R. Woods, Problem-based Learning: How to Gain the Most from PBL. Waterdown, Ontario: Donald R
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Building Skills in Engineering: Hand & Power Tool Workshops for Confidence & RetentionAbstractThis work examines a pilot program open to all undergraduate students in the Herbert WertheimCollege of Engineering at the University of Florida on the use of common hand and power toolsthrough a series of 7 weekly hands-on workshops led by a female faculty member as an openopportunity to gain building skills.The goals of the program include:a) Creating a safe environment for engineering students to learn, build, fail & redesign, withoutpressure of grades or deliverables;b) Increasing individual student tool knowledge, basic making skills, and
earned in the sophomore-level course (TSM 210) is significantlypredictive in both models. Students who earn a “B” or better in TSM 210 have higherprobabilities of success. High success is also likely when students have an above average SoPrating (3 or greater), suggesting that students who are willing to dedicate their resources tolearning the introductory material at the sophomore level will see higher rates of success thanthose who do not. The freshmen-level course (TSM 115) does not seem to play a similar role inpredicting student success. When student SoP is not considered in the model, ACT compositeand mathematics scores become more important to the prediction.Another important measure is the accuracy of the models. Total model accuracy is
–5, Aug. 2017.10. S. Lee, Y. Kim, and B.-H. Lee, “Effect of Virtual Reality-based Bilateral Upper Extremity Training on Upper Extremity Function after Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial,” Occupational Therapy International, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 357–368, 2016.11. M. Gandolfi, C. Geroin, E. Dimitrova, P. Boldrini, A. Waldner, S. Bonadiman, A. Picelli, S. Regazzo, E. Stirbu, D. Primon, C. Bosello, A. R. Gravina, L. Peron, M. Trevisan, A. C. Garcia, A. Menel, L. Bloccari, N. Valè, L. Saltuari, M. Tinazzi, and N. Smania, “Virtual Reality Telerehabilitation for Postural Instability in Parkinson's Disease: A Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial,” BioMed Research International, 26-Nov-2017. [Online
. Ghalsasi. "Cloud computing—The business perspective." Decision support systems 51, no. 1 (2011): 176-189. 3 B. Rimal, E. Choi, and I. Lumb. "A taxonomy and survey of cloud computing systems." In INC, IMS and IDC, 2009. NCM'09. Fifth International Joint Conference on, pp. 44-51. IEEE, 2009. 4 P. Mell, and T. Grance. "The NIST definition of cloud computing." (2011). [Online]. Available: https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-145/final. [Accessed March 9, 2018] 5 L. Leong, R. Bala, C. Lowery and D. Smith. "Magic quadrant for cloud infrastructure as a service, Worldwide" Gartner (2014). [Online]. Available: https://www.gartner.com/doc/reprints?id=1- 2G2O5FC&ct
S, Phelps R, Eisenberg M. "A link between emergency dispatch and public access AEDs: Potential implications for early defibrillation". Resuscitation 2011;82:995–8.[20] Hess EP, White RD. "Increasing AED use by lay responders: Implementation challenges and opportunities for knowledge translation". Resuscitation 2011;82:967–8.[21] Budgen D, Kitchenham B, Brereton P. The Case for Knowledge Translation. 2013 ACM / IEEE Int. Symp. Empir. Softw. Eng. Meas., IEEE; 2013, p. 263–6.[22] Ruppertsberg AI, Ward V, Ridout A, Foy R. "The development and application of audit criteria for assessing knowledge exchange plans in health research grant applications". Implement Sci 2014;9:93.[23] Davenport Huyer L
of Career Assessment. 2007; 15:403–422.Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman; 1997.Crabtree, B. & Miller, W. (1999). A template approach to text analysis: Developing and using codebooks. In Crabtree, B., Miller, W. (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 163–177.) Newbury Park, CADeci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985b). The General Causality Orientations Scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109-134.Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024-1037.Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In
/teaching-activities/flipping-the-classroom/, 2013.11. Anderson, H. G., Frazier, L., Anderson, S. L., Stanton, R., Gillette, C., Kim B.,Yingling, K. Comparison of Pharmaceutical Calculations Learning Outcomes AchievedWithin a Traditional Lecture or Flipped Classroom Andragogy. American Journal ofPharmaceutical Education; 81 (4), 2017.12. Koo, C. L., Demps, E. L., Farris, C., Bowman, J. D., Panahi, L., Boyle, P. Impact ofFlipped Classroom Design on Student Performance and Perceptions in a PharmacotherapyCourse. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education; 80 (2), 2016.13. Moravec, M., Williams, A., Aguilar-Roca, N., and O’Dowd, D.K. Learn beforelecture; a strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology
% (b) Working with engineering students can provide mentor’s organization with a new way of looking at and solving problems Figure 4. Benefits to practitioners and practitioners’ organizations Student perception Practitioner perceptionStrongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% (a) Bridging the gap between what is learned in the engineering curriculum and what is expected of graduates when they work in industry.Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 0
assistance and minimal Means for use consistently gets by guess work occasionally assistance and tool and incorrect results (2) applies the tool consistently does (1) inappropriately applies tool not try (3) appropriately (0) (4)Using a, b, c 1 3 4 3.37ANSYS todo
order to increase the retention rate by 20% (6.5% per project year) from the base of 50.4% [4], starting spring 2018. Performance Indicators: o By September of each project year, The retention rate is expected to increase by 6.5% o By April 2020, at least 50% of CS graduating students will have a grade of B or better in the programming subject of computer science exit exam conducted by ETS. 3. Integrate an undergraduate research program to involve at least 12-20 junior and senior computer science students during the last 2 years of project, starting fall 2018. Performance Indicators: o Involve at least 3-5 students per semester in
scales are normed to a mean of 50.In the present sample, students clearly excelled in analytic thinking (mean 83.59) and were quiteguarded and impersonal in their positions (mean 14.87). Their sense of confidence (mean 59.76)and emotionality (mean 42.90) were somewhat above and below the mean, respectively. Twosample submissions provide examples of contrasts in these variables, and provide informalevidence of the validity of the LIWC results. Student A excels in analytic thinking and isconfident, but distant and not self-disclosing (e.g., through the use of pronouns like “I”), andexpresses little affect regarding the issues. In contrast, Student B is lower on analytic thinking,but high on self-disclosure (readily using pronouns like “I” and “me
Section 6.1.4 Accreditation Requirements for Computing ProgramsFor the most part, all four commissions of ABET follow a harmonized set of accreditation require-ments. These requirements differ in Student Outcomes (“describe what students are expected toknow and be able to do by the time of graduation”), Curriculum and Faculty criteria, as these tendto be most connected with the program’s discipline. The computing accreditation criteria are thuscomposed of eight categories divided into two parts: (a) general criteria, and (b) program-specificcriteria. The CAC program-specific criteria require that the general criteria be met, and provide upto three additional requirements for criterion 3 (student outcomes), criterion 5 (curriculum) and cri
://www.themanufacturinginstitute.org/%20~/media/827DBC76533942679A15EF706 7A704CD.ashxDym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103-120.Flowers, J. (2010). The problem in technology education: A definite article. Journal of Technology Education, 21(2),10-20.Gattie, D. & Wicklein, R. (2007) Curricular Value and Instructional Needs for Infusing Engineering Design into K12 Technology Education. Journal of Technology Education, 19(1), 6-18.Goldman, S., Kabayadondo, Z., Royalty, A., Carroll, M. P., & Roth, B. (2014). Student teams in search of design thinking. Design Thinking Research.Grubbs, M., &
of Learners Classroom,” Cogn. Instr., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 399–483, Dec. 2002.[3] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410–8415, 2014.[4] B. Means, Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, M. Bakia, and K. Jones, “Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning,” Structure, p. 66, 2009.[5] S. W. T. Choe and P. M. Drennan, “Analyzing scientific literature using a jigsaw group activity,” J. Coll. Sci. Teach., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 328–330, 2001.
Multiple choice questions (N = (response) (response) (response) 30 responses) % % % opportunities. How would you rate the balance of the content? 11 a. technical lecture content need more just right need less (4) 13.3% (19) 63.3% (7) 23.3% 11 b. technical need more just right need less tour content (9) 30% (20) 66.7% (1) 3.3% 11 c. project need more just right need less work (5) 16.7% (24) 80% (1) 3.3% 11 d. computer programming need
plane.The distribution of grades in this section was as follows; Grade Frequency A 9 B 7 C 6 D 5 F/W 9The results are not indicative of any change in grades distribution in this course.The Likert-type scale results for question on engagement and enhanced learning are statisticallysignificantly positively correlated with the Spearman correlation coefficient 𝜌 = 0.688 (𝑝 −value < 0.005). 6 5 Enhanced Learning 4 3 Enhanced Learning 2
://www.arj.no/2012/03/12/disciplinarities-2/Kaplan, Sandra, Gould, B. Frames: Differentiating the Core Curriculum. CA: Educator to Educator, 1998.Levi-Strauss, C., The Savage Mind: The University of Chicago Press, 1962. 1-33.Streveler, R., Smith, K., Pilotte, M. (2012). “Aligning Course Content,Assessment, and Delivery: Creating a Context for Outcome-Based Education”IGA Global: Outcome-Based STEM: Innovative Practices, chapter 1, (pp. 2-26).Stevens, Wallace, 1879-1955 author. Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird. Nacogdoches, Texas:Stephen F. Austin State University Press, 2013Svinicki, M.D., (2004). Learning and Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom. San Francisco, CA:Anker Publishing Company.Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning
a different innovative idea gaining public support. This cycle Proceedings of the 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2018, American Society for Engineering Educationhappens because the innovation (a) requires more effort than was initially expected, (b) theinnovation supporters depart, (c) the personnel performing the ongoing maintenance of theinnovative idea lack formal maintenance training, or (d) funds run out. In an effort to overcomethis typical innovation lifecycle, P-20 leaders must carefully plan for the implementation ofinnovation. Especially if the innovation is a new concept and disruptive to the education process.When implementing changes to the P-20 education
a Model for theInterior Design Classroom: Bridging the Skills Divide Between Academia and Practice.Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 9(2).Hatcher, J. A. (2008). The public role of professionals: Developing and evaluating the Civic-Minded Professional scale. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Pro Quest Dissertation andTheses, AAT 3331248.Steinberg, K. S., Hatcher, J. A., & Bringle, B. G. (2008) Civic-Minded Graduate: A North Star.Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 18, 19-33.Sutton, Sharon. “Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning.” Michigan Journal ofCommunity Service Learning, Vol. 19, No. 1, Fall, 2012 - A Peer-Reviewed Publication | OnlineResearch Library: Questia, Oct. 2012, www.questia.com
datacaptured while they read the instructions for atask. The (i) Data Acquisition & FeatureExtraction, (ii) Model Building & Tuning, and(iii) Model Evaluation steps of the proposedmethod are illustrated in Fig. 2. For this work,students’ performance is assumed to be afunction of their task completion timemeasured in seconds. Students are classifiedbased on this performance as (i) “below” Figure 2. Outline of proposed methodaverage or (ii) “above” average. That is, if astudent i takes longer than the average of all student that performed that same task t, student i isclassified as A)“above”; otherwise is classified as B)“below”; for i ϵ set of students {I} and t ϵset of tasks {T}.2.1
, Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine-University of Lagos. Former Head, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria.Prof. Akinwale Oladotun Coker P.E., University of Ibadan Akinwale Coker holds B. Sc and M. Sc degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Ibadan and Obafemi Awolowo University respectively. His Ph. D in Environmental Engineering was obtained at the University of Ibadan. His trajectory in academia began as a lecturer in 1991, rising to Professorship in 2010. Professor Coker has successfully supervised about 100 students at B.Sc and M.Sc levels an ten Ph.Ds to date. He has 75 publicatiions in reputable international outlets, including three
. Socialization and the acquisition of professional discourse: A case study in the PR industry. Writ. Commun. 29, 7–32 (2011).9. Austin, A. E. Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty: Graduate School as Socialization to the Academic Career. J. Higher Educ. 73, 94–122 (2002).10. Duff, P. A. Language socialization into academic discourse communities. Annu. Rev. Appl. Linguist. 30, 169–192 (2010).11. Lea, M. R. & Street, B. Writing as academic literacies: Understanding textual practices in higher education. in Writing: Texts, Processes, and Practices (eds. Candlin, C. N. & Hydlan, K.) 62–81 (Longman, 1999).12. Johnson, E. M. Toward the building of a cross-disciplinary doctoral research and writing culture. J
general identification and demographic questions as well as specific questions to assessthe success of the workshop. The survey was distributed at the beginning of the workshop andcollected prior to the participants leaving the session. Participants were asked the followingquestions: (1) Participant Information a. Student Name (optional) b. Student E-mail c. Gender d. Current Classification e. Ethnicity (optional) f. Major (2) Please indicate your level of awareness for each question: a. GRE (before workshop) b. GRE (after workshop) c. Graduate school as future option (3) Please indicate your perceived level of importance for each question