Engineering Subject Centre. Higher Education Academy Engineering Subject Centre. ISBN 978-1-904804-741 6. Yorke, M. and Longden, B., 2007. The first-year experience in higher education in the UK. The Higher Education Academy. Available from www.eacademy.ac.uk/ourwork/research/surveys/fye 7. Frey, D., 2007. The Importance of Freshman-Year Projects. MIT Faculty Newsletter, Volume XIX, No. 4.Appendix A: Course Redesign Effectiveness SurveyQ1ExportCustomizeHow much did the redesigned 'Foundations of Engineering'course increase your interest and enthusiasm about STEM education?Answer Choices– Responses
. Sutcliffe, A., & Gault, B. (2004). Heuristic evaluation of virtual reality applications. Interacting with computers, 16(4), 831-849.23. Congote, J., Segura, A., Kabongo, L., Moreno, A., Posada, J., & Ruiz, O. (2011, June). Interactive visualization of volumetric data with webgl in real-time. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on 3D Web Technology (pp. 137-146). ACM.
appropriate mastery of the knowledge,techniques, skills and modern tools of their disciplines; b) an ability to apply current knowledgeand adapt to emerging applications of mathematics, science, engineering and technology; c)design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints; h) understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, andsocietal context; and k) use techniques, skills, and tools in engineering practice. Required andrecommended textbooks are: G. M. Masters, Renewable and Efficient Electric Power Systems,B.K. Hodge, Alternative Energy Systems and Applications, and instructor lecture notes.Other alternative energy power generation sources (e.g., geothermal, marine energy
teaching and learning Sample items from reflection survey 1. To what extent, if any, do you agree that you engaged in each of the following types of activities during this workshop? a. I performed hands-on learning activities with the EV3 LEGO robot b. I constructed the robot chassis and mechanisms using instructions provided by workshop facilitators c. I programmed LEGO EV3 brick by following provided sample programs and instructions 2. To what extent, if any, do you agree that you experienced each of the following types of learning as a result of your participation in the workshop? a. I gained greater understanding of the applications of science, technology
. Martinez, S. L., & Stager, G. (2013). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Torrance, CA: Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.17. McCoy, D., & Adams, J. (2017). STEM Ventures in Robotics. Unpublished.18. Mulchandani, A. (n.d.). Lesson Plan for Bridge Building. Retrieved from http://beam.ucla.edu/sites/default/files/docs/Bridge_Building.pdf19. Nadelson, L. S., Seifert, A. L. & Chang, C. (2013). The perceptions, engage- ment, and practices of teachers seeking professional development in place-based integrated STEM. Teacher Education and Practice, 26, 242–265.20. Nadelson, L. S., Seifert, A. L., Moll, A. & Coats, B. (2012). i-STEM summer institute: An integrated approach to teacher
were recruited with about $60K ofscholarships distributed. The scholar selection criteria are: 1) U.S. Citizen, Permanent Resident, U.S. National or aliens admitted as refugees; 2) Enrolled full time for each long semester in which a scholarship is received; 3) Incoming sophomore, junior or senior; sophomore has priority; 4) Have completed Calculus I, Calculus II and Calculus-based Physics I with minimum grades of B; 5) Have a minimum LU GPA of 3.0 (cumulative and within the major), or otherwise demonstrate successful progress towards and commitment to the completion of IE/ME degree; 6) Have declared Industrial Engineering or Mechanical Engineering as the major; 7) Demonstrate financial need as defined by the US
% 71% Government 4-year organization academic Commercial 5% organization institution, Other 11% 2% 22% (a) Community Colleges (b) Industry Figure 1: Organization Types, Number of Participants and Survey ParticipantsThe survey included questions about preferred professional development program type, preferredlength
. In the proposed methods, students will take“Although our group was pretty quiet and didn't personality tests, including both Kolb and MBTI, and thiscommunicate as much as we maybe should have, I feel we will form partial criteria for group formation. In groups of 3-still efficiently accomplished our goal and were all on the 4, students could be grouped with both complementary andsame page throughout the project. Progress was self-similar personalities, in an effort to understand whatconsistently made each class period, and we remained on matches are most effective for (a) project success and (b)track throughout the semester (for the most part).” student
Academies.National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Tank, K. M., Moore, T. J., Dorie, B. L., Gajdzik, E., Sanger, M. T., Rynearson, A. M., & Mann, E. F. (in press). Engineering in early elementary classrooms through the integration of high-quality literature, design, and STEM+C content. In L. English, & T. J. Moore (Eds.), Early engineering learning. Springer.Tank, K. M., Moore, T. J., & Strnat, M. (2015). Engineering encounters: Using nature as inspiration for engineering design. Science and Children, 53(2), 72-78. doi: 10.2505/4/sc15_053_02_72Tank, K. M., Pettis, C., Moore, T. J
ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering b. An ability to design and conduct experiment, as well as to analyze and interpret data An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic c. constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability d. An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams e. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g. An ability to communicate effectively The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a
Paper ID #18564Informal Mentorship of New Engineers in the WorkplaceDr. Pryce Davis, University of Nottingham Pryce Davis is an Assistant Professor of Learning Sciences at the University of Nottingham. He received his Ph.D. in Learning Sciences from Northwestern University. His research interests include learning in informal settings and public engagement with science.Dr. Alexandra Vinson, Northwestern University Alexandra H. Vinson is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the School of Education and Social Policy at Northwest- ern University. She received her Ph.D. in Sociology & Science Studies from the University of California
for studying the axial load/displacement behavior of wire samples are shown in Fig. 3.Two common features between them are displacement and axial load measurements. However, thesefeatures were implemented using various innovative designs. Spring 2017 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 7-8, 2017 MSU (a) (b) (c) (d)Fig. 3: Testers using a digital balance as the load cell (a), a long wire for enhance displacementmeasurement (b), a rotational arm for small samples (c), and a bucket of water for small load increaseincrements (d) Spring 2017 Mid
Paper ID #19162Teams and Team Building at Baylor University: Why Should We Do This andWhere Should It Occur in the Curriculum?Dr. Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University Ken Van Treuren is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at Baylor University. He received his B. S. in Aeronautical Engineering from the USAF Academy in Colorado Springs, Colorado and his M. S. in Engineering from Princeton University in Princeton, New Jersey. After serving as USAF pilot in KC-135 and KC-10 aircraft, he completed his DPhil in Engineering Sciences at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom and returned to the USAF Academy
Adolescents, Journal of STEM Education, Vol. 12, No. 1 & 2, 43-54. 2. Crittenden, K. B. & Turner, G. E. (2011) Building Relationships by Avoiding the "Show- and-Go": a STEM Project for High Schools, Proceedings of the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 3. Christie, B. A. (2012) Creating Partnerships between your University and Community- Based Out-of-School Time Programs to Improve the STEM Pipeline, Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 4. Goonatilake, R. & Bachnak, R. A. (2012) Promoting Engineering Education Among High School and Middle School Students, Journal of STEM Education, Vol. 13, No
Engineering Education, 1995. 3(2): p. 89-96.39. Ionescu, C.M., et al., A remote laboratory as an innovative educational tool for practicing control engineering concepts. IEEE Transactions on Education, 2013. 56(4): p. 436-442.40. Aktan, B., et al., Distance learning applied to control engineering laboratories. IEEE Transactions on education, 1996. 39(3): p. 320-326.41. Méndez, J.A. and E.J. González, A reactive blended learning proposal for an introductory control engineering course. Computers & Education, 2010. 54(4): p. 856- 865.42. Mason, G.S., T.R. Shuman, and K.E. Cook, Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE
Conference, Cairo, Egypt, November 16-19, 2010.14. Huang, Y. (2016). Integrating Building Information Modeling in Existing Courses: A Systematic Framework for Undergraduate Construction Management Programs. Proceedings of the 123 rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, June 26-29, 2016.15. Pavelko, C. and Chasey, A. (2010). Building Information Modeling in Today’s University Undergraduate Curriculum. Proceedings of the 2010 Ecobuild America, Washington, D.C., December 6-10, 2010.16. Becerik-Gerber, B., Gerber, D.J., and Ku, K. (2011). The Pace of Technological Innovation in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Education: Integrating Recent Trends into the Curricula. Journal of Information
Paper ID #18833Community Health Innovation through an Interprofessional CourseDr. Jacquelyn Kay Nagel, James Madison University Dr. Jacquelyn K. Nagel is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison Uni- versity. She has eight years of diversified engineering design experience, both in academia and industry, and has experienced engineering design in a range of contexts, including product design, bio-inspired de- sign, electrical and control system design, manufacturing system design, and design for the factory floor. Dr. Nagel earned her Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Oregon State
other groups will conclude correctly that thebottom strain will be largest, the middle strain will be next largest, and the strain on top of thebeam will be smallest.After coming to a group consensus, a student carefully hangs the 2-kg mass at mid-span andmeasured strains are recorded. Students observe that the top and bottom strains areapproximately the same magnitude but opposite signs and the middle strain is approximatelyzero (an example is shown in Figure 6). (a) Top SG (b) Middle SG (c) Bottom SG Figure 6 Strain readings for 2-kg loadWith this discovery, the instructor graphically summarizes the strain distribution through
provide opportunities for written and oral communications 4. To provide opportunities for working in teamsWhile the ABET outcomes addressed by this course are: 1. An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering: (a)- Reinforcement 2. An ability to design and conduct experiments as well as to analyze and interpret data: (b)-Emphasis 3. An ability to design a civil engineering system to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability and sustainability: (c)-Reinforcement 4. An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams: (d)- Reinforcement 5. An ability to
agreement between all four measures used to determine thenumber of clusters. The undulating nature of the CH index (Figure 1D) seems to indicate a smalltendency towards subgroups in this cluster solution. Because the intended purpose of our clusteranalysis is to select participants for follow-up interviews, these subgroups may become moreuseful in elucidating the differences between individuals within a larger cluster. B A C DFigure 1: Plots used to determine the ideal cluster solution using Ward’s
not done in a timely manner, students from the other discipline might not be given enough time to implement their part of the project. Time management as well as enabling the students to engage in the project in cross-functional ways is key in this situation. b. Students of one discipline do not appreciate the contributions of the other discipline; alternatively, they tend to think in very structured ways about their respective disciplines and do not appreciate and take advantage of the overlap and complementary skill sets that exist between disciplines.As advisors of long standing of teams that have, at one time or the other exhibited at least one,but
(a) (b) (c) Figure 1: Students preparing Green Concrete samples by using (a) saw dust, (b) demolished concrete, and (c) glassFigure 2: Different groups conducting compressive and tensile strength tests on Green Concrete samplesAs discussed earlier, at the end of Green Concrete project students were given questionnaire. Theresponses of 48 subjects in questionnaire are presented in Table 2. Based on responses toQuestion#1 and #5 presented in Table 2, it is evident that more than 75% subjects gave a responseof 4 or 5 (moderately or strongly agree) which indicates that Green Concrete project helpedstudents in
Humanitarian Engineering minor < https://osuhe.engineering.osu.edu>.In order to earn the Engineering Global Option designation, OSU students must completecoursework and/or fieldwork in each of the following four categories: A. Early Education Abroad (3 credit hours) B. International Elements of Engineering (3 credit hours) Courses involving international elements that apply engineering/technical knowledge OR Co-op/Internship outside the U.S. C. Foreign Culture or Language (6 credit hours) D. International Engineering Design (6 credit hours)In 2015, a biological engineering student was the first student to graduate from OSU with theGlobal Option in Engineering distinction. Her
), and on the ASCE/ACI-421: Design of Reinforced Concrete Slabs Technical Committee of the American Concrete Institute (ACI). Besides several peer-reviewed journal and conference publications, he has co-edited a book published by the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBUH). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Conference and Exposition 25 - 28 June 2017, Columbus OH Deployable Structures: An Interdisciplinary Design ProcessAbstractHistory reveals that architects and engineers have constantly sought new and creative structuralsystems. Many special systems have thus evolved, namely
, and particularly forengineering undergraduates (Felder, Felder, and Dietz, 1998; Prince, 2004; Hake, 1998; Colbeck,Campbell, and Bjorklund, 2000; Johnson, Johnson, and Smith, 1998a,b; Springer, Stanne, andDonovan, 1999; Terenzini, 2001). The project was further informed by the positive learning andretention outcomes reported following curricular innovations to integrate math, science, andengineering content in undergraduate engineering programs at other institutions (Carr, 2003;Froyd and Ohland, 2005; Olds and Miller, 2004). The expected benefits for first-yearengineering students of the Engineering Math Workshops innovation include: a more thoroughunderstanding of the mathematical concepts in the core course; an enhanced ability
, CA: John Wiley &Sons pp.120, 231, 247, 261Fulwiler, T. (1987a). The Journal Book. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers, 45-46Fulwiler, T. (1987b). Teaching with Writing. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook Publishers,37-44Gragson, D. & Hagen, J. (2010). Developing Technical Writing Skills in the Physical ChemistryLaboratory: A Progressive Approach Employing Peer Review. Journal of Chemical Education,87(1), 62-65Neuendorf, K. (2002). The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage PublicationsNorusis, M. (2005). SPSS 14.0 statistical procedures companion. Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall, 152, 183Olds, B. (1994). Using Draft Reviews to Improve Writing and Thinking in Engineering Classes.Proceeding of the Frontiers in
Campus study is to address the urgentneed to expand the pool of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) graduates,especially African American, Native American, and Hispanic students. Long-term improvementsin the pipeline of a diverse STEM workforce start with sustaining effective bridge programs thatcan produce more Engineering baccalaureates. To improve retention in Engineering, this studywill conduct academic enrichment programs for racially underrepresented Engineering studentsat three points in their career at the Penn State—entering freshmen, rising sophomores, and risingjuniors. The goals of the study are to (a) increase retention in Engineering among raciallyunderrepresented students in the Penn State system, (b) develop long
topic of ecosystems as a valuable analogy were thefollowing findings: 1. Embrace the imperfect, but powerful, ecosystem metaphor. a. Develop an appreciation for entire engineering education ecosystem— including, but not limited to, student advisors, residence life, higher education personnel outside of engineering, etc. b. Discover new partners in the ecosystem (e.g. admissions officers). c. Develop the ecosystem framework and our understanding of keystone species to be able to make better investments. 2. Share the ecosystem metaphor with students and colleagues to facilitate a more comprehensive perspective. 3. Better understand the needs of the different
, they were asked to describe any resistance that they faced. Follow-up questions inquiredabout other presentation styles that participants observed from peers and superiors and thoughtsthat participants had about spreading the AE approach to industry and graduate research. The fullquestion tree for the survey can be found in Appendix A and a sample survey can be found inAppendix B. Because the sample size of this exploratory study was small, we did not attempt to measurefor any statistical significance. Instead, we sought solely to gather responses to our three researchquestions to determine whether we should pursue a larger and more formal study.Results: Students Using Assertion-Evidence Style in Professional Settings As
science or math lessons. Thus, we (the researchers) confirm that theteachers have experience of implementing at least one science or math lesson using robotics in aclassroom setting in middle schools. Next, we asked the teachers to anonymously respond to aTPACK related questionnaires (see Appendix A) and a TPACK self-efficacy survey (seeAppendix B). So far, a total of nine science and eight math teachers have responded to theinstrument of Appendix A and eight science and eight math teachers have responded to theinstrument of Appendix B.We adopted the following working hypothesis for examination in this study.Hypothesis: There are significant differences in the i) requirements of technological, pedagogical,and content knowledge perceived by