education at the University of Michigan.Dr. Mar P´erez-Sanagust´ın, Universit´e Paul Sabatier Toulouse III Mar P´erez-Sanagust´ın is a researcher and Associate Professor at the Computer Science Department of the Universit´e Paul Sabatier and associate researcher at the Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile. Her research interests are technology-enhanced learning, engineering education, Self-Regulated Learning, MOOCs and b-learning.Dr. Jorge Baier, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile He is an associate professor in the Computer Science Department and Associate Dean for Engineering Education at the Engineering School in Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile. Jorge holds a PhD in Computer Science from
. While there were numerous lessonslearned on effective project implementation, overall the project was viewed as a success atintroducing longitudinal design in a structural engineering course sequence.References[1] G. Nowak, B. Shoop, and L. Shay, “Deliberate Longitudinal Curricular Integration: Topical Linkages and Concept Reinforcement,” 112th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR. https://peer.asee.org/14924, 2005.[2] Y. Li, “Enhancing Undergraduate Education Through Research-based Learning: A Longitudinal Case Study,” 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA. https://peer.asee.org/24010. [Accessed November 2018], 2015.[3] Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U
current feelings toward problem solving resided (i.e. equation to use when we don’t cover them too much infrom motivated to indifferent, from comfortable to lecture.”intimidated). An example semantic differential scale, used This resistance quickly dissipated, and we attribute some of theduring the study, is given in Appendix B. Student were also newfound comfort with both the teaching method andgiven an open-ended biomechanics challenge, which they were problem-solving methods to prompt and diverse formativeasked to ponder and then qualify their confidence toward assessment.reaching a correct solution according to a 7-point Likert scale.In the same manner as the interview sessions
event in the 4th through 6th grades that they are eligible;that is, they attend for all three years. As repeat activities would be boring for the girls, newactivities are created each year, to maintain their interest in both the GEE event and STEM in (a) Group Assembly in 2018 (b) Lunch Room in 2017 Figure 1: GEE Event Photographsgeneral. Each GEE activity is designed to last for approximately 25 minutes. A typical GEE eventday is shown in Table 1. Girls are provided with T-shirts printed with the GEE logo on the day ofthe event. Different color T-shirts identify different groups of participants. Colors listed inTable 1, therefore, refer to T-shirt colors. Volunteers are also
experience (in which our undergraduate students teachSTEM activities in elementary after school programs in diverse communities) influence theirideas about: (1) STEM, (2) teaching elementary students about STEM, and (3) teaching diversepopulations of students?, and B) Were there differences in these ideas depending upon theelementary school site where the service learning practicum took place? The undergraduates’experiences and developing perspectives are examined through written reflections and fieldobservations throughout the semester. Instructors' field notes from the service learningexperience are used as a data source of triangulation. In general, results from this study indicatethat undergraduate students’ ideas about STEM and STEM teaching
acceptable. They are graded based on the rubric in Table 1.Table 1 - The rubric for the Puzzle Project. This table provides an outline of the expectations forthe Puzzle Project. For a full grading scale with an exact point breakdown see the Puzzle Projectdocumentation in the Appendix. A Innovative, unique puzzle. Leads the user to a Reviews show an understanding solution through its design (without being trivial of another person’s work and to solve). Elevator pitch conveyed the idea offers constructive, positive behind the puzzle and excited the audience. criticism to improve the puzzle. B Clever puzzle. Fulfills the requirements above Reviews offer constructive
identified as we invite more participants. Example codesfrom the categories and relevant quotes are described as follows. Table 4. A List of Learning Outcomes Learning Outcomes Frequencies Count of Students Knowledge A. Fundamental engineering knowledge 16 6 B. Cultural knowledge 14 7 C. Academic environment 2 2 D. Employment 3 2 Skills A. Interpersonal skills 14
Criteria The ABET program-specific curriculum criteria for biomedical engineering,bioengineering, or similarly named engineering programs are listed below in their entirety [17]. “The curriculum must prepare graduates with experience in: a) Applying principles of engineering, biology, human physiology, chemistry, calculus- based physics, mathematics (through differential equations) and statistics; b) Solving bio/biomedical engineering problems, including those associated with the interaction between living and non-living systems; c) Analyzing, modeling, designing, and realizing bio/biomedical engineering devices, systems, components, or processes; and d) Making measurements on and
the feasibility of electric flight with commercial aircraft. Another project isworking with Collins Aerospace and applying ADS-B technology to other aircraft such asUnmanned Aerial Systems (UASs). Both projects are examples of students working with industryexperts and working on projects that are forward thinking and engaging students to think aboutproblems that they may need to address once they have graduated from Iowa StateUniversity.AssessmentAssessment of Project Based Learning (PBL) can often be challenging. As we also use a flippedclassroom, the learning is shifted more to the students and requires a different set of assessmenttools than the more typical homework, quizzes, and tests. To accommodate the fact each project isdifferent and
. This course enhanced my awareness of professional ethics and responsibility. This course helped me develop my ability to identify and acquire new knowledge as part of the problem. Assistance is available inside and outside lab. Course Support The content of the lectures and skill sessions were relevant to the course. The lab facilities supported my team’s needs.Quantitative evaluation have always focused on specific course/program objective but the specificquestions changed slightly. Table 2 shows the original questions and the percentage of studentsrating the course with an A or B grade for each objective, accumulated over the first 15
attended the Summer Institute, resulting in four additional Comm Labadaptations to date, including Brandeis and Rose-Hulman. Key features of all three Comm Labsare summarized in Table 1.Table 1: Comparison of key Communication Lab features across implementations MIT Brandeis Rose-Hulman Date founded Winter 2012-2013 in Fall 2017 Fall 2018 Dept. A, and subsequently adapted across four other Depts., B through E Institution type Private research Private research Private STEM college
used to supplement instructions, students are inspired to pursueSTEM careers [4]. In 2012, the Office of Research of West Virginia Department of Educationconducted a research on the effect of project-based learning; its report shows that, teachers whoreceived extensive training on project-based learning were capable of teaching the 21st CenturyStandards more effectively compared with teachers without experience on project-based learning[5]. (a) Teachers conducting mechanical engineering projects (b) Teachers conducting electrical engineering projects Figure 1: Two photos of our workshop in Project Based Learning.We have organized three workshops with project-based learning as the theme to high school
actual input data; it onlyrelies on n. Therefore, a lookup table can be pre-computed and loaded at runtime. We first definean algorithm in Python-based pseudocode that determines where samples should reside at eachstage of the algorithm, as in Figure 2. Figure. 2 Algorithm for computing table A of sample indices at each stage From this table, we can compute another table that explicitly states the destination indexthat a sample needs to be sent to. That is, using the new table B, calculated using the algorithm inFigure 3, during stage s, sample i in the current buffer should be sent to position B[s][i]. Figure. 3 Algorithm for determining table B, which contains the destination of the current stage's samples
Theory and Practice to Solve Client-based Problems," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[3] A. S. Masters, "How Making and Maker Spaces have Contributed to Diversity & Inclusion in Engineering: A [non-traditional] Literature Review," in 2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Conference Proceedings, Crystal City, VA, 2018.[4] V. Wilcyznski and M. M. Cooke, "Identifying and Sharing Best Practices in International Higher Education Makerspaces," in 2017 ASEE International Forum, Columbus, 2017.[5] T. Katona, S. Tello, B. O'Tool and I. Avdeev, "Pathways Partners: Entrepreneurial Change Across Campus," National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance
, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 64-69, 2018.[11] B. R. Jordan, "A bird’s-eye view of geology: The use of micro drones/UAVs in geologic fieldwork and education," GSA Today, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 50-52, 2015.[12] S. G. Zwaan and E. I. Barakova, "Boxing against drones: Drones in sports education," in Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 2016, pp. 607-612: ACM.[13] I. Lindsay, "Drone Panel Presentation: Using drones in archaeological research: Kasakh Valley Archaeological Survey (KVAS), Armenia," 2016.[14] A. Bruzzone et al., "Disasters and Emergency Management in Chemical and Industrial Plants: Drones Simulation for Education and Training," in International Workshop on
for all.References[1] S. Reges. “Why Women Don’t Code,” Quillette, June 19, 2018 [Online]https://quillette.com/2018/06/19/why-women-dont-code/ [Accessed January 14, 2019].[2] B. Oakley. “Why do Women Shun STEM? It’s Complicated,” Wall Street Journal, July 13,2018 [Online] https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-do-women-shun-stem-its-complicated-1531521789 [Accessed January 14, 2019].[3] J. Steinke. "Adolescent girls’ STEM identity formation and media images of STEMprofessionals: Considering the influence of contextual cues." Frontiers in Psychology 8 (2017):716.[4] K. H. Collins. "Confronting Color-Blind STEM Talent Development: Toward a ContextualModel for Black Student STEM Identity." Journal of Advanced Academics 29.2 (2018): 143-168.[5] S. L
Paper ID #26416Engineering Education Using Inexpensive DronesDr. Randy Michael Russell, UCAR Center for Science Education Randy Russell develops science and engineering education curriculum and trains teachers via his job with the K-12 education group at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), a large atmospheric science research lab in Boulder, Colorado. He has a Ph.D. in education from Michigan State, a Master’s degree in aerospace engineering from U. Maryland, and a B.S. in astrophysics from Michigan State. He did most of the development work on a drone-based engineering education curriculum for underrep
schools has to focus on professional skills and certificates that are acceptedby industry [5]. Some suggest that welding learning process have to include interaction of studentsand their teacher and that it has to include the following: a) the melt (the most central aspect); b)metal transfer mode (weight drop and how the melt flows in relation to welding mode, as here,position B); c) the base material; d) the arc length; e) the movement; e) travel speed; f) the bodyposition; g) the current (amperage); e) the distance to the welding material; and f) the base material[6]. It is also important to define the ways that student and a trainer will interact [6]. Hands onwelding happens in the environment with different visual and audio observations and
with a variety of audiences. 2. To expose students to a diverse set of future career opportunities available to STEM PhD holders.With an immersive training experience in mind, the SciComm program integrated a variety ofknowledge-based learning activities about communication, practice with communicating, andpractical experience communicating with various audiences. Program participants also engagedwith peers, practitioners, and professionals throughout the program. The program curriculum included three primary components: a) bi-weekly seminarmeetings, b) communication challenges, and c) mentorship by University alumnus/a. The threecomponents were designed to integrate hands-on learning and practical application to helpstudents
management. - Students need help to learn effective time management [7].Table 2b. Other criteria deemed important for the feasibility of the teaching methodsCriteria Rationale for including criteria a. Need for instructor resources. With large classes, the TMs require a lot with respect to instructor time allocated per student e.g. feedback, grading of assignments. This criterion assesses the overall instructor workload. b. Need for technical resources. The technical feasibility of the TMs must be assessed. Does the approach require advanced technology? This criterion
Engineering vs. Humanities Fields (b) Within Engineering Figure 2: Women in tenure track/tenured academic positions in the U.S. [25], [31], [32]Women in the Engineering WorkplaceHistorically speaking, women have already made significant progress in the U.S. engineeringworld. Although the first bachelor’s degree was earned by a woman in 1876 [33], manyengineering schools refused to enroll women prior to the passage of Title IX in 1972 whichrequired
Paper ID #27804Entrepreneurial Intentions and Actions of Engineering Graduates: WhatContributes to Increased Intentions and Continued Entrepreneurial Skill De-velopment?Mr. Christian Schnell, Stanford University Christian is currently pursuing a Master in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Technical Uni- versity of Munich (TUM). Within his studies he focuses on power engineering as well as automation and robotics. He is also a participant in the Entrepreneurial Qualification Program ”Manage&More”. This is an additional education at the Center for Innovation and Business Creation at the TU Munich (”UnternehmerTUM
closeproximity, the touch sensors detected physical contact and the actuators propel the robot. Theactuators were controlled by the microcontroller and were coded to move at a specific speed. Thepower supply was a 2200mAh battery that powered the microcontroller, actuators and thesensors. The microcontroller acted as the brain of the unit and received signals from the differentcomponents. and reacted according to how the students coded.The success of these two projects along with other team projects emphasized the importance ofthe interdisciplinary knowledge being taught to freshmen engineering majors.Figure 1 (a) Infrared sensor attached to an actuator to rotate a cube; (b) EV3 Mindstorms Brick (Controller) Figure 2 The
second year re- enrollment. Journal of College Student Retention, 7 (1-2).[7] Mulinazzi, T. (1996). The 60-Hour Rule. Success 101, Issue 1.[8] Landis, R. B. (2013). Studying engineering: A road map to a rewarding career, 4th Edition. Burbank, Calif: Discovery Press.
Engineering take the course as freshmen.4. Project-based service-learning: The pilot course was service-learning based. a. One service-learning project was the focus of all 15 weeks of instruction with students both designing, fabricating, and testing real hardware to deliver to a community partner. b. Students designed hardware and STEM education based learning materials for faculty parents of middle school kids working at the university. c. The advising process was done during two design reviews where faculty met students. d. Students delivered final projects to faculty during a showcase at the end of the semester.5. Learning and teaching management: The course is administered through a learning management
Academic Couples: What Universities Need to Know. Stanford, CA: Michelle R. Clayman Institute for Gender Research, Stanford University. Available from http://www.stanford.edu/group/gender/Publications/index.html.• Sprunt, E. (2016). A Guide for Dual-Career Couples: Rewriting the Rules : Rewriting the Rules. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger.• Wolf-Wendel, Lisa, Susan B. Twombly, and Suzanne Rice. 2003. The Two-body Problem: Dual- career couple Hiring Policies in Higher Education. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.• Yoder, B. L. (2018) Engineering by the numbers. American Society for Engineering Education.
(b) Kettering University Team Figure 1: Year 1 AutoDrive TeamsAutoDrive is providing students with practical engineering experience in replacing an organichuman driver with an inorganic autonomous driver. The Chevrolet Bolt vehicle is being modifiedfrom its production form, in which manual control by a human being is required, to its finalcompetition form in which the vehicle is under full automatic control of the autonomous driver, asdefined by SAE Level 4. The many application areas to be addressed include, but are not limitedto, sensor installation, data acquisition, signal processing, filter design, artificial intelligence,image processing, control design, computer software programming, and computer
identify whether certaininteraction styles better serve specific purposes. These insights are valuable for defining andpracticing research skills for undergraduate and graduate students. Our findings could alsoinform training programs for graduate and undergraduate students as well as for faculty andothers who work with multilevel research teams. 11References[1] B. Latour and S. Woolgar, Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986.[2] A. Johnson, Hitting the brakes: engineering design and the production of knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2009.[3] J. Lave and E
Paper ID #26849Employer Perceptions of Undergraduate Student Entrepreneurial Experi-enceMrs. Elizabeth Rose Morehouse, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Liz Morehouse is an assistant director in Career Services & Employer Relations at Rose-Hulman Insti- tute of Technology. She received a B.A. in Spanish and M.S. in Community Counseling from Northern Kentucky University in 2007 and 2009, respectively. She is an award-winning curriculum designer with significant experience providing leadership and career development opportunities for college students.Dr. Thomas P. James P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Tom
field.References[1]. National Science Board, “Science and Engineering Indicators 2018”. NSB-2018-1. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation. Available at https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/indicators/.[2]. J. McFarland, B. Hussar, X. Wang, J. Zhang, K. Wang, A. Rathbun, A. Barmer, E. Forrest Cataldi, and F. Bullock Mann, “The Condition of Education 2018” (NCES 2018-144). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2018144.[3]. V. Lundy-Wagner, “Developmental Mathematics and the Community College STEM pipeline”, ASEE Conference, Indianapolis, IN, June, 2014.[4]. L. Jimenez, S. Sargrad, J. Morales