Conference Session

Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 4: Minoritized Student Experiences

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aimee Sayster, Clemson University ; Jessica Allison Manning, Clemson University; Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants; Catherine Mobley, Clemson University; Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University; Rebecca Brent, Education Designs, Inc

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

women in engineering, though this type of study can enhancealready existing research. The capitals men and women utilize should be observed forresearchers to gain a better understanding of the different ways these demographics succeed inengineering.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1734347. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. Additionally, this work is partially supported by the Clemson University CreativeInquiry program.References[1] S. L. Dika and M. M. D'Amico, “Early experiences and integration in the persistence

Conference Session

Military and Veterans Division (MVD) Technical Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Haroon Malik, Marshall University; David A. Dampier, Marshall University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Military and Veterans Division (MVD)

and programs to identify gaps or areas where the microcredentials could offer a unique value proposition to veterans. (d). Evaluating the resources available at the HEI to support microcredentials, including faculty expertise and technology infrastructure. (e). Mapping out a plan for marketing and promoting the microcredentials to veterans and relevant employers; a crucial and most important step to ensure the success of the program(s) offering MC to veterans. Rather than engaging digital marketing firms, institutions that develop and offer microcredentials should identify the most effective direct communication channels to reach employers and veterans. For example, reaching out to organizations

Conference Session

Faculty Development and Research Programs (NEE)

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James W. Giancaspro, University of Miami; Diana Arboleda, University of Miami; Aaron Heller, University of Miami; Ali Ghahremaninezhad, University of Miami

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)

institution's administration to explore incentives, support, productivity metrics, graduate student advising, and long-term career goals associated with a transition into EER 4. Pursue funding opportunities geared towards new engineering education researchers who are initiating research in EER9. AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2141984, 2149857, and 2204892. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.10. References[1] J. Bernhard, "Is engineering education research engineering research?," in International

Conference Session

Peer Mentorship, Cross-Race Mentoring Relationships, Race, Gender, Student Success, and Career Outcomes

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xiwei Wang, Northeastern Illinois University; Shebuti Rayana, SUNY, Old Westbury; Sherrene Bogle, California Polytechnic, Humboldt ; Palvi Aggarwal, University of Texas, El Paso; Yun Wan, University of Houston, Victoria

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)

best paper awards. Her professional activities include journal reviews for Computers & Security, Cy- bersecurity, Frontiers in Psychology, and conference reviews for HFES, AHFE, HICSS, Euro S&P, and CyberSA. She is also an advocate for the Cybersecurity Community of Practice at UTEP and a member of the Special Cyber Operations Research and Engineering (SCORE) Interagency Working Group.Yun Wan, University of Houston, Victoria Yun Wan is a Professor of Computer Information Systems in the University of Houston- Victoria. His current research includes electronic commerce and information systems in STEM education. His other research includes text analytics, decision support systems, and enterprise systems development

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tanja L. Greene, E.S. Witchger School of Engineering, Marian University; Hansika I. Sirikumara, E.S. Witchger School of Engineering, Marian University Indianapolis, IN; Binh Q. Tran, Marian University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

enjoys creating inclusive environments where students feel supported while exploring STEM related topics. Tanja is also an active member of the prestigious national engineering honor society, Tau Beta Pi, where she serves as an advisor for a local university’s chapter. And more recently, she has stepped into the role of co-advisor to launch a new collegiate SWE affiliation on the Marian Campus.Dr. Hansika I. Sirikumara, E.S. Witchger School of Engineering, Marian University Indianapolis, IN Hansika Sirikumara, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor of Physics and Engineering at Marian University, E. S. Witchger School of Engineering. She completed her MS and PhD degrees from Southern Illinois University Carbondale. Her

Conference Session

COVID-19, Next Generation of STEM Professionals, and Racialized Organizations

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eleazar Marquez, The University of Texas, Rio Grande Valley; Samuel Garcia, Texas State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)

resolute spirit that can help catalyze creative solutions and generate a senseof hope needed in academia.REFERENCES[1] Andre, E., Williams, N., Schwartz, F., Bullard, C. Benefits of Campus Outdoor RecreationPrograms: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership.2017, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp 15-25.[2] Bailey, T., Alfonso, M. Paths to persistence: An analysis of research on program effectivenessat community colleges. Indianapolis, IN: Lumina Foundation of Education. 2005.[3] Bauman, S., Wang, N., DeLeon, C., Kafentzis, J., Zavala-Lopez, M., Lindsey, M.Nontraditional students’ service needs and social support resources: A pilot study. Journal ofCollege Counseling, 7, 13-17. 2004.[4] Bell, B.J., Holmes, M. Important

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 7: Developing Graduate Students' Competencies and Identities

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelli Cargile Cook, Texas Tech University; Fabiola Liliana Carrion-Anampa, Texas Tech University; Diego Alejandro Polanco-Lahoz, Texas Tech University; Jennifer A. Cross, Texas Tech University; Mario G. Beruvides P.E., Nanyang Technological University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

(OP): comments with this code reference program recruitment, enrollment, matriculation, or other overall curricular design • Projects & Assignments (PA): comments with this code reference projects and assignments students completed in a course and may include class activities, readings, tests, papers, etc. • Scholarship (S): comments with this code reference publications or presentations students have published or submitted for publication. • Research Experience (R): comments with this code reference research experiences in classes or with faculty (but not specific to publications or presentations) • Courses (CO): comments with this code reference specific courses taken, not assignments

Conference Session

Student Experiences and Development – Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Natalie Evans, University of Virginia; Jessica Scoville, University of Virginia; Jamie J. Jirout, University of Virginia; Caitlin Donahue Wylie, University of Virginia; Elizabeth Opila

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

timeworking in a research lab had a greater impact on their long-term goals than their classes, andworking in the lab made them consider graduate school. “But like, [PROFESSOR]’s lab I think, makes me- it like, put the idea of graduate school in my head, even though that was like never in my- I never thought about it before. I was just kind of going to get my degree and then start doing something I was more interested in. But now, like, since I’m interested in research, it’s opening up different doors in my mind. I’m like, ‘I could do that, in materials science’ or get master’s in materials science and then work still in aerospace, just on the materials side, which would be like, very cool. . . But I still

Conference Session

COED: Grading Systems

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chenyan Zhao, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Matthew West, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Mariana Silva, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2012.00366.x [3] C. A. Shaffer and S. H. Edwards, “Scheduling and student performance,” in Proceedings of the 16th Annual Joint Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ser. ITiCSE ’11. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2011, p. 331. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/1999747.1999842 [4] S. Willman, R. Lindén, E. Kaila, T. Rajala, M.-J. Laakso, and T. Salakoski, “On study habits on an introductory course on programming,” Computer Science Education, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 276–291, 2015. [5] G. Schraw, T. Wadkins, and L. Olafson, “Doing the things we do: A grounded theory of academic procrastination,” US, pp. 12–25, 2007. [Online

Conference Session

Empowering Students: Self-Efficacy, Advising, and Transfer Success

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shiny Abraham, Seattle University; Agnieszka Miguel, Seattle University; Kenneth A. Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)

Transfer: Measures of Effectiveness in Helping Community College Students to Complete Bachelor’s Degrees (Signature Report No. 13)," National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, Herndon, VA, 2017, 2022 update.[4] "Community college enrollment crisis?: Historical trends in community college enrollment," American Association of Community Colleges, Washington, DC, 2019.[5] J. Causey, A. Gardner, H. Kim, S. Lee, A. Pevitz, M. Ryu, A. Scheetz and D. Shapiro, "COVID-19 Transfer, Mobility, and Progress: First Two Years of the Pandemic Report. Ninth in the Series," National Student Clearinghouse, Herndon, VA, 2022.[6] "Current Term Enrollment Estimates: Fall 2022 Expanded Edition," National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, 2023

Conference Session

Minoritization Processes and Equity in Engineering Education

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stacey Sexton; Amanda Menier, SageFox Consulting Group; Rebecca Zarch, SageFox Consulting Group

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

intersectionality include [13]–[15]. Researchers who have exposure tothis area already will likely recognize that one Crenshaw citation [16] that is used to signal thatintersectionality is being considered. We ourselves are guilty of including just this citation as asignal that we are trying to do something more than just examining our population data, but wefall short when we do not prioritize reading and theorizing beyond that shallow attribution.We call on ourselves and our fellow researchers to recognize that intersectionality is an entirefield and one which we must approach with some humility. We encourage our fellow researchersto recognize (y)our own positionality and limitations, and know when you need to invitesomeone(s) else. We do want to caution

Conference Session

Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 8

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan J. Ely, University of Southern Indiana; Andrew Jason Hill, University of Southern Indiana; Kelly Marie Sparks, University of Southern Indiana

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity

education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 1,pp. 13–31, 2019.[11] S. Niles, S. Roudbari and S. Contreras, “Integrating Social Justice and Political Engagementinto Engineering,” International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice and Peace, vol. 7, no. 1,pp. 57-69, 2020.[12] National Academy of Engineers, “NAE Grand Challenges for Engineering”, EngineeringChallenges, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges.aspx[Accessed: October 27, 2022].[13] R. Roscoe, D. Becker, R. Branaghan, E. Chiou, R. Gray, S. Craig, R. Gutzwiller and N.Cooke, “Bridging Psychology and Engineering to Make Technology Work for People,”American Psychologist. vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 394-406, 2019.[14] B. Altay, “User-centered design

Conference Session

Minoritization Processes and Equity in Engineering Education

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brandon Bakka, University of Texas at Austin; Travis Bouchard, The University of Texas at Austin; Vivian Xian-wei Chou, University of Texas at Austin; Maura Borrego, University of Texas at Austin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

whiteheterosexual cisgender woman. The researchers also represent undergraduate student, graduatestudent, and faculty roles in a variety of engineering and/or engineering education fields. Thiswork is deeply rooted in the experiences of oppression and marginalization of the LGBTQ+authors in STEM and seeks to find ways to undermine the systems of oppression that havecaused harm to them and others.Methods This research used focus groups and individual interviews to explore the experiences ofLGBTQ+ STEM undergraduate students at a large R1 university in the U. S. southwest. Datacollection occurred in Fall of 2020. Interview and focus group recruitment was achieved using acall that was sent to out to all graduate and undergraduate students through

Conference Session

Research Methodologies – Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Brooks Michael Leftwich, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Russell Korte, The George Washington University; Cory Brozina, Youngstown State University - Rayen School of Engineering; Aditya Johri, George Mason University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

] G. L. Downey, The machine in me: An anthropologist sits among computer engineers. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 1998.[6] W. Faulkner, “Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures. II. Gender in/authenticity and the in/visibility paradox,” Engineering Studies, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 169–189, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1080/19378620903225059.[7] D. Vinck, Ed., Everyday engineering: An ethnography of design and innovation. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2003.[8] L. L. Bucciarelli, Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1994.[9] J. Trevelyan, “Reconstructing engineering from practice,” Engineering Studies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 175–195, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2010.520135.[10] K. J. B. Anderson, S. S. Courter, T

Conference Session

Materials Division (MATS) Technical Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lessa Kay Grunenfelder, University of Southern California

Tagged Divisions

Materials Division (MATS)

, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 123–138, 2006, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x.[3] R. N. Savage, K. C. Chen, and L. Vanasupa, “Integrating Project-based Learning throughout the Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum,” Journal of STEM Education, vol. 8, no. 3 & 4, 2007.[4] R. M. Marra, C. Plumb, and D. J. Hacker, “Developing Metacognitive Skills in PBL Undergraduate Engineering Introduction and Background,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2018.[5] K. Johnson, S. Claussen, J. A. Leydens, J. Blacklock, J. Y. Tsai, and N. Plata, “The Development of Sociotechnical Thinking in Engineering Undergraduates,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2022. [Online]. Available: www.slayte.com[6] M. Ashby, Materials

Conference Session

Sociotechnical Systems in Practice

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nandini Sharma, The University of Texas at Austin; Jeffrey W. Treem, University of Texas at Austin; Megan Kenny Feister, CSUCI

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

., Plant, T. A., Morris, M. E., & Seel, N. R. (1994). Collaboration media: The problem of design by use and the use of design. In Scrivener, S.A.R. (Ed.), Computer- supported Cooperative Work (1st ed., pp. 113-131). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429462276-8Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1– 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1Kaptelinin, V. & Nardi, B. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. MIT Press.Knorr Cetina, K. (1997). Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(4), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327697014004001Leonardi

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tom J. Zajdel, Carnegie Mellon University; Allison E. Connell Pensky, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)

isyour major or intended major?” and “What is your gender identity?”Participants self-reported what they perceived their sources of SE in the course to be byanswering the open-ended question: “What experience(s) in this course have contributed to yourconfidence in building circuits?”The complete survey instrument can be found in the Appendix.MaterialsData were collected before and after participants completed an open-ended design project. Aspart of this course project, participants were presented with a lab kit containing a toolbox ofprototyping tools (e.g., digital multimeter, screwdriver, wire strippers, and a solderlessbreadboard), a robotics kit, and other supplies necessary to carry out the design project (seeAppendix for a complete list of

Collection

ASEE-NE 2022

Authors

Filip Cuckov, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Marisha Rawlins, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Pilin Junsangsri, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Wayne Bynoe, Wentworth Institute of Technology; James R McCusker PhD, Wentworth Institute of Technology; José R. Sánchez, Wentworth Institute of Technology

Council (WEEF-GEDC), Nov. 2020, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/WEEF-GEDC49885.2020.9293654.[2] X. Xu, Y. Lu, B. Vogel-Heuser, and L. Wang, “Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception,” J. Manuf. Syst., vol. 61, pp. 530–535, 2021.[3] P. O. Skobelev and S. Y. Borovik, “On the way from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: From digital manufacturing to digital society,” Ind. 40, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 307–311, 2017.[4] P. K. R. Maddikunta et al., “Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications,” J. Ind. Inf. Integr., p. 100257, 2021.[5] F. Sánchez Carracedo et al., “Competency Maps: An Effective Model to Integrate Professional Competencies Across a STEM Curriculum,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 27

Conference Session

ERM: New Research Methods and Tools

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph Mirabelli, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Sara Vohra; Eileen Johnson, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

items from Method 1’s strongest factors were coupled with a different set ofitems in Method 2’s factor structure.Method 3: Under-loading and cross-loading iterations. In this method, five under-loading itemswere removed, one cross-loading item was removed, and then that procedure was repeatediteratively. In total, 49 items were retained across 10 factors. We noticed that whileimplementing this method, the removal of one cross-loading item often reduced the total numberof factors, presumably by weakening the factor structure of two latent factors from the previousiteration and causing the weaker of the two latent factors to be removed from the sample.Method 4: Fixed factors. In this method, the number of factors was fixed to 10, and otherwise

Conference Session

ERM: Exploring Educational Technology in Engineering

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danielle Dickson; Rafal Jonczyk; Elif Gunay; Janet Van Hell, Pennsylvania State University; Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma

Paper ID #37269Utilization of Automatized Creativity Ratings inLinguistically Diverse Populations: Automated Scores Alignwith Human RatingsDanielle S. Dickson Danielle Dickson received her PhD from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2016 with a dissertation examining the memory system’s representation of numerical information, using behavioral and electro-physiological (EEG, brainwaves) measures. She extended this work into comparisons of children and adults’ arithmetic processing as a postdoctoral scholar at The University of Texas San Antonio. Her most recent research examines creative thinking

Conference Session

Two-Year College Potpourri

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Diego Reyes; Brooke Coley, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus

. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.xBahr, R. P., Jackson, G., McNaughtan, J., Oster, M., & Gross, J. (2017). Unrealized Potential: Community College Pathways to STEM Baccalaureate Degrees. The Journal of Higher Education (Columbus), 88(3), 430–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1257313Bos, A., Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D., & Stutterheim, S. E. (2013). Stigma: Advances in Theory and Research. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2012.746147Fry, R., Kennedy, B., & Funk, C. (2021). STEM jobs see uneven progress in increasing gender, racial and ethnic diversity. PEW Research Center

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 1: Adapting to COVID and other Design Challenges

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Orser, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Lorraine Francis, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; John Sartori; Kyle Dukart, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Brody Hultman, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Lauren Linderman, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Aaron Massari, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; R Penn, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities

’ experiences.Throughout this journey, students and faculty clearly did not enjoy the transition to onlinelearning. Despite this negative baseline, the data show no significant change in survey responsesconcerning the design process (CSE 1012 LO #2-3), core quiz grades (EE 1301 LO #1-3), or theoverall perceptions of students (SRTs). Thus, there is good reason to believe that these sustainableadaptations, necessitated by the pandemic, should be retained.References[1] C. L. Dym, A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L. J. Leifer, “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 103–120, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x.[2] K. A. Smith, S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson

Conference Session

ERM: Problem Solving and Conceptual Understanding

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Roman Taraban, Texas Tech University; Sheima Khatib, Texas Tech University; Jacob Vaughn, Texas Tech University

demonstrated here through cluster analyses.Promising future projects relate to developing better tools to collect and analyze more extensivestudent reflections on their problem-solving behaviors. Related to more fruitful qualitative datacollection and analysis is the prospect of better understanding the ways in which problem-solving steps form into effective networks of information and coherent problem-solving plansand strategies. The present study takes a small step in that direction.References[1] Bloom, B.S., and D.R. Krathwohl, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classificationof Educational Goals, New York, NY: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1956.[2] Bloom, B. S. "Test reliability for what?" Journal of educational psychology 33, no. 7 (1942):517.[3

Conference Session

EMD Technical Session 1: Captstone, Ethics, and Statistical Methods

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth McDonald, United States Military Academy

write what they felt andprovide feedback on how to improve the study (see AAR Questions section).The following objectives were achieved:1. Conduct a character/virtue pre-survey.2. Conduct initial meeting and provide a virtue class to refresh and assist cadets with astandard baseline of virtue understanding. Answer any questions.3. Provide relevant reading(s) to educate cadets on virtue. Cadets will read the articlesbefore beginning the exercise and provide three questions or comments about the articles.4. Develop a daily “reminder tool/technique” to remind themselves to observe virtuous acts.5. Conduct a passive 5-day exercise (Monday-Friday) on virtue observations and log thenumber of encounters each day. Cadets were given logbooks to log

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Arianne Collopy, University of Colorado Denver; Heather Johnson; Katherine Goodman, University of Colorado Denver; Tom Altman; Maryam Darbeheshti, University of Colorado Denver; Kristin Wood, University of Colorado Denver; David Mays

,” National Science Foundation, NSB201510, 2015. Accessed: Feb.07, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://nsf.gov/pubs/2015/nsb201510/nsb201510.pdf[6] L. B. Kelly, “Draw a Scientist: Uncovering students’ thinking about science and scientists,” JRes Sci Teach, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1188–1210, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1002/tea.21447.[7] A. C. Barton, S. Menezes, R. Mayas, O. Ambrogio, and M. Ballard, “What Are the CulturalNorms of STEM and Why Do They Matter?,” CAISE: Center for Advancement of InformalScience Education, Nov. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.informalscience.org/what-are-cultural-norms-stem-and-why-do-they-matter[8] H. Fardi and G. Alaghband, “Assessment Strategies for Student Recruitment and Retention inEngineering,” GSTF International

Conference Session

LEES 6: Writing & Communication

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rebecca Essig, Purdue University Fort Wayne

teammates, but using the worksheet helps students practiceproject management skills and helps give them a method for communicating an absentee teammember. Table 3. Example tasks for a Workload Distribution Worksheet Task Team Member(s) Time Spent [min] Developed plan for experiment Wrote plan for experiment Recorded 2D motion videos Digitized videos in Tracker Processed data in Excel Created height graphs Created height equation Created setup diagram Created Results Table Proofread and edited graphics submittal Participated in peer review Wrote discussion on setup diagram Wrote discussion on height graph Wrote discussion on

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Student Growth

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Jensen, United States Air Force Academy; Luke Jensen; William Allison; Adam Goodworth; Douglas Fontes

, and technical competence to derive more detailed conclusionson how the charter of the program might be applied to lead to the best possible outcomes forstudents.REFERENCES 1- Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., Sullivan, W., (2009), Educating Engineers- Designing for the Future of the Field, Jossey-Bass, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching,. 2- Cooper, C. A., Anderson, M. L., Bruce, C., Dorman, S. G., Jensen, D. D., Otto, K., & Wood, K. L. (2015, June). Designettes in Capstone: Initial design experiences to enhance students’ implementation of design methodology. In Proceedings of the 122nd American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition (pp. 14- 17

Conference Session

College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles Baukal, John Zink Hamworthy Combustion; Linda Thurman, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Carter Stokeld

National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25284.[5] E. May and D. Strong. “Is engineering education delivering what industry requires,” Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), pp. 204-212, 2006.[6] S. Brunhaver, R. Korte, S. Barley, and S. Sheppard, “Bridging the Gaps Between Engineering Education and Practice,” in R. Freeman and H. Salzman (eds.), U.S. Engineering in a Global Economy, University of Chicago Press, 2018.[7] A. Agrawal and S. Harrington-Hurd, “Preparing next generation graduates for a global engineering workforce: Insights from tomorrow's engineers,” Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 29(4), 5-12, 2016.[8] C. Baukal

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division ASCE Liaison Committee - Supporting the Development of the Next Civil Engineers

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Patricia Clayton, Wake Forest University; Daniel Castaneda, James Madison University; Monica Palomo, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Carolyn Rodak, State University of New York, Polytechnic Institute; Stacey Kulesza, Kansas State University; Pinar Omur-Ozbek, Colorado State University

in the ETW. The poll contained questions asking participants to respond to questionsusing a Likert scale with 1 being the lowest rating and 5 being the highest rating. When asked“How likely are you to recommend ECX Roundtable Discussions to a colleague?,” the averageresponse was 4.6, suggesting that participants value and support the program. For the question,“Do you feel like you gained new insights or new knowledge from the ECX RoundtableDiscussion(s)?,” the average response was slightly lower, at 4.2, suggesting that participants whoself-selected to attend the session based on their interest in the topic may have had some previousawareness of the ideas discussed in the session.The Future of ECXThe 2020 and 2021 offerings of ECX support

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brayan Díaz, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Cesar Delgado, North Carolina State University (NCSU), Raleigh, NC; Kevin Han, North Carolina State University at Raleigh

skills of graduate students in engineering(Markes, 2006; Ramadi E, Ramadi S and Nasr, 2016; Saeki and Blom 2011). This gap createsanxiety and frustration for recent graduates in the workforce (Jackson, 2014; Kolmos andHolgaard, 2019). Moreover, the construction industry demands for students to have more fieldexperience before joining the workforce (Atkison and Pennington, 2012).One strategy to bridge the gap is better integrating competencies developed in industry with thecompetencies developed in the universities. To better prepare graduates for the workforce, theindustry-based competencies must be transferable and adaptable so that graduates can applythem to different scenarios. Construction engineering education programs must prepare