Conference Session

Civic Engagement and Volunteerism in Engineering

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David A. Delaine, Universidade de São Paulo and IFEES; Jose Roberto Cardoso, Universidade de São Paulo; Joachim Walther, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

Paper ID #13586Qualitative Analysis of Boundary Spanning Implications within Interviews ofEngagement StakeholdersDr. David A. Delaine, Universidade de S˜ao Paulo and IFEES David A. Delaine has a Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Drexel University, in Philadelphia, USA. He currently serves as an executive member of the International Federation of Engineering Education Societies (IFEES), as Vice President for Student Engagement, Diversity, and Inclusion. IFEES aims to strengthen engineering education practices around the world. He has recently completed his tenure as a Fulbright Scholar and is currently performing

Conference Session

Communication Across the Divisions III: Writing as Social–Technical Integration

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Natascha M. Trellinger, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Rebecca R. Essig, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Cary D. Troy, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Josh Boyd, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Computing & Information Technology, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

, Pages Textbook Title Author(s) Edition Chapter Analyzed Analyzed rd Fluid Mechanics: Cengel, Y.A., & 2014, 3 Ed. 5. Bernoulli and 230-242 Fundamentals and Cimbala, J. M. Energy Equations Applications Fundamentals of Munson, B.R., 2013, 7th Ed. 3. Elementary 141-156 Fluid Mechanics Okiishi, T. H., Fluid Dynamics – Huebsch, W.W. & The Bernoulli Rothmayer, A.P. Equation

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Approaches for Enhancing Non-technical Skills

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Reneta Davina Lansiquot, New York City College of Technology; Candido Cabo, New York City College of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

. Page 26.1404.125. References[1] Assessment and Institutional Research. (2010). CUNY Student Experience Survey. New York City College of Technology, CUNY.[2] Barnett, S. & Ceci, S (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612-637.[3] Bateman, C. (Ed.). (2007). Game writing: Narrative skills for videogames. Boston: Charles River Media.[4] Benander, R., & Lightner, R. (2005). Promoting transfer of learning: Connecting general education courses. The Journal of General Education, 54 (3), 199-208.[5] Brooks, R. E. (1977). Towards a theory of the cognitive processes in computer programming. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 9, 737-751.[6] Cabo, C

Conference Session

Cultivating Engineering Scholarship and Research Mindsets Among URM Students

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amelito G. Enriquez, Canada College; Wenshen Pong P.E., San Francisco State University; Hamid Shahnasser, San Francisco State University; Hamid Mahmoodi, San Francisco State University; Cheng Chen, San Francisco State University; Xiaorong Zhang, San Francisco State University; Kwok Siong Teh, San Francisco State University; Nicholas Langhoff, Canada College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

experiences support science career decisions and active learning.” CBE Life Sciences Education 6: 297-306.3. Russell, S. H., M.P. Hancock, and J. McCullough. (2007 ). “The pipeline. Benefits of undergraduate research experiences.” Science 316(5824): 548-9.4. Kinkel, D. H. and S. E. Henke. (2006). “Impact of undergraduate research on academic performance, educational planning, and career development.” Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education 35: 194-201.5. Lanza, J. and G. C. Smith. (1988). Undergraduate research: A little experience goes a long way. J. Coll. Sci Teach. 18:118-1206. Hunter, A-B., S. L. Laursen, and E. Seymour. (2007). “Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Evaluating Student Behaviors and Attitudes

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Philip Reid Brown, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Shannon M. Sipes, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

the assessment of that academy.References 1. Kumar, S., & Hsiao, J. K. (2007). Engineers learn “soft skills the hard way”: Planting a seed of leadership in engineering classes. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 7(1), 18-23. 2. Galloway, P. D. (2008). The 21st Century Engineer: A Proposal for Engineering Education Reform, ASCE Press, Virginia 3. Creed, C. J., Suuberg

Conference Session

Student Success II: Self-Regulatory, Metacognitive, and Professional Skills

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Chen, California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

completion. The twotools were tested in various engineering courses and mixed results were found: While both toolswere adoptable, only the exam wrapper appeared to be efficacious in this study.Introduction     Metacognition, which has as its simplest definition thinking about one’s thinking, is themodern term used to capture the processes that learners use to reflect upon and take actions toimprove their learning. The psychologist John Flavell1 introduced the term in the 1970’s whileadvancing research on the topic, but ideas about the usefulness of reflection in improvinglearning began much earlier, starting with John Dewey2. Both Piaget and Vygotsky – bothrecognized widely for their theories in education – wrote of the role of metacognition in

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Linda Vanasupa, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Lizabeth T Schlemer, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

persistentstructure of the education system even though we were explicitly attempting to behavedifferently. As we, the faculty and students, began to recognize the structure we could let go ofthe problem and the solutions. However, this “letting go” had to occur repeatedly (almostweekly) as the issue continued to be bothersome to many of us.What are the cultural beliefs, values, and paradigms that are causing the problems of intransigentSTEM pedagogies that result in STEM cultures that are exclusive? We first note that “S” refersto the physical, or equivalently, the natural sciences; it excludes all other organized ways ofthinking, or “sciences.” Implicitly, natural sciences are prioritized over other “sciences.”The natural sciences derive knowledge through

Conference Session

Emerging Computing and Information Technologies I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Douglas M. Schutz, Tokyo University of Science; Dante Dionne, Korean Air; Yong-Young Kim P.E., Konkuk University

Tagged Divisions

Computing & Information Technology

tacit.Explicit knowledge is codified and captured in archives and databases in discrete words ornumbers. Tacit knowledge, on the other hand, provides the context for developing andunderstanding explicit knowledge [7]. Tacit knowledge is not codified and is, therefore,harder to communicate. The development of tacit knowledge is a continuous activity betweenindividuals sharing experiences for mutual understanding [6].Knowledge needs to be continuously created in order for it to be continuously shared.Nonaka [6] proposes that knowledge is created through the conversion between tacit andexplicit knowledge via four modes, referred to by the acronym SECI, in a continuous cycle:1) socialization (S) is creating tacit knowledge from other tacit knowledge through

Conference Session

Student Evaluation in Design Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University; Robin Dawn Anderson, James Madison University; Cheryl Alyssa Welch

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

expertise in biomedical engineering students.In Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Albuquerque, NM[2] Brophy. S., Hodge, L. & Bransford, J. (2004, October). Work in progress – Adaptive expertise: Beyond applyacademic knowledge. In the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.[3] Crawford, V. M., Schlager, M., Toyama, Y., Riel, M., & Vahey, P. (2005, April). Characterizing adaptive expertise inscience teaching. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.[4] De Arment, S. T., Reed, E., & Wetzel, A. P. (2013). Promoting Adaptive Expertise A Conceptual Framework forSpecial Educator Preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education: The

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dhinesh Balaji Radhakrishnan, Purdue University; Jennifer Deboer, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International

the course. Future data collection will also provide the opportunity to assess thecourse’s long-term viability and effectiveness as either a stand-alone course within thecurriculum or as an incubator that can be integrated into existing courses.References1. Streveler, R. A., Smith, K. A. & Pilotte, M. Aligning course content, assessment, and delivery: Creating a context for outcome-based education. K. Mohd Yusof, S. Mohammad, N. Ahmad Azli, M. Noor Hassan, A. Kosnin S. K, Syed Yusof (Eds.), Outcome-Based Educ. Eng. Curric. Eval. Assess. Accreditation. Hershey, Pennsylvania IGI Glob. (2012).2. Wiggins, G. P. & McTighe, J. Understanding by design. (Ascd, 2005).3. Dewey, J. Education and experience. (1938).4

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sushil Acharya, Robert Morris University; Priya Manohar, Robert Morris University; Walter W Schilling Jr., Milwaukee School of Engineering; Peter Y Wu, Robert Morris University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

.2.2.1 Development Academic Partner and ActivitiesDistinguished faculty members from the Milwaukee School of Engineering and Virginia StateUniversity (a HBCU partner) have supported this project from the very beginning asDevelopment Academic Partners. Mutual interest is instrumental in this longstandingpartnership. The role of the academic development partner is well defined and involves thefollowing:  Identifying at least one local industry partner involved in software development activities  Working with assigned focus groups to critically review current course  Developing six hours of course modules to address identified gaps in a content area familiar to the university program and its local industry partner(s

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Facilitating Student Success and Inclusion

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lizabeth T. Schlemer, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Linda Vanasupa, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

creativity and innovation. The instructordecides what should be learned based on their own paradigm of what a good engineer shouldknow, but this does not take into account the interests of the student or the ever-changing needsof the world. The underlying assumption of this predominant system is that human beings are notnatural learners and must be forced to learn through external behavioral motivations such asreward and punishment.A look through the literature shows that in the 1990’s, before No Child Left Behind (NCLB),there was much talk about grading and assessment, mostly related to standards-based grading.The discussion faded from view as the consequences of NCLB focused on the detrimental effectsof standardized testing. During these early

Conference Session

Assessment I: Developing Assessment Tools

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leroy L. Long III, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

for Applied Research. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/ecar-study-undergraduate-students-and-information-technology-2012[3] Flowers, L., Pascarella, E. T., & Pierson, C. T. (2000). Information technology use and cognitive outcomes in thefirst year of college. Journal of Higher Education, 637-667.[4] Kuh, G. D., & Hu, S. (2001). The relationships between computer and information technology use, selectedlearning and personal development outcomes, and other college experiences. Journal of College StudentDevelopment, 42(3), 217-232.[5] Kvavik, R. B., Caruso, J. B., & Morgan, G. (2004). ECAR study of students and information technology 2004:Convenience, connection, control, and learning. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE

Conference Session

Learning and Assessment in ME 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ana Dyreson P.E., University of Wisconsin, Madison; Corinne R. Henak, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

; Wenderoth, M. P. (2008). Biology in Bloom: Implementing Bloom’ s Taxonomy to Enhance Student Learning in Biology. CBE - Life Sciences Education, 7, 368–381. http://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08Forbes-Lorman, R. M., Harris, M. A., Chang, W. S., Dent, E. W., Nordheim, E. V., & Franzen, M. A. (2016). Physical models have gender-specific effects on student understanding of protein structure-function relationships. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 1– 10. http://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20956Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of

Conference Session

Instrument Development

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eugene Judson, Arizona State University; Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University; James A. Middleton, Arizona State University; Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University; Robert J. Culbertson, Arizona State University, Department of Physics; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

research, 24(3), 366-385.3. Branford, J. D., & Donovan, S. M. (2005). How students learn: history, mathematics, and science in the classroom. National Academies Press, Washington.4. Sadler, D. R. (1998) Formative assessment: revisiting the territory, Assessment in Education, 5(1), 77–84.5. Butler, D. L. & Winne, P. H. (1995) Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis, Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281.6. Yorke, M (2003) Formative assessment in higher education: moves towards theory and thenhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45(4), 477–501.7. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Division Technical Session 13

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian K. Dean, Oakland University; Osamah A. Rawashdeh, Oakland University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

used to rank eachcandidate in which a low GPA would not automatically disqualify an applicant as long as therewere other positive aspects within the application. Positive aspects included: extracurricularactivities that demonstrate ability to work on a team, personal statement demonstrates a passionfor a particular area of research that matches the planned REU projects, no prior researchexperience, home institution lacks research opportunities, high GPA in particular course(s),and/or exceptional recommendation letter(s). At least six quality applicants from the target poolwere selected. The remaining four slots would go to the highest ranked applicant in either targetor non-target pool.The only factor that could automatically disqualify an

Conference Session

Humanitarian and Sustainability in a Global Engineering Context

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christina Kay White, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Renetta G. Tull, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Yevgeniya V. Zastavker, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Rovani Sigamoney, UNESCO

Tagged Divisions

International

Organization (UNESCO).References[1] W. Cobern. Socio-cultural perspectives on science education: An international dialogue. Dordrecht, TheNetherlands: Springer Publishing, 1998.[2] J. S. Eccles. Where are all the women? Gender differences in participation in physical science and engineering.In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren't more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence(pp. 199-212). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2007.[3] M. Greene. Self-consciousness in a technological world. Retrieved 3 January 2008 fromwww.pocketknowledge.tc.edu. n/a 1965-2008.[4] L. Lee & D. Wilson. Empowering the engineering undergraduate in an era of economic globalization, Frontiersin Education Conference: Indianapolis

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Postcard Session 2: Identity and Sense of Belonging

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sura Al-Qudah, Western Washington University ; Jill Davishahl, Bellingham Technical College; Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College; Michael Andrew Greiner

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Technical College Jill Davishahl is a faculty member in the engineering department at Bellingham Technical College where she teaches courses ranging from Intro to Engineering Design to Engineering Statics. Outside of teach- ing, Jill is working on the development of a Bachelor of Applied Science in Engineering Technology and is currently PI on the NSF funded ATE project grant in renewable energy as well as PI on an NSF funded S-STEM project. She holds a Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Washington.Mr. Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College Eric Davishahl is faculty and engineering program coordinator at Whatcom Community College. His teaching and research interests include

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Ross Pfluger, Colorado School of Mines; Junko Munakata Marr, Colorado School of Mines; Gary Vanzin; Robert L. Siegrist, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

Frequency Frequency (%) (n=12 projects) (n=10 projects) Health 20 37 85% increase Toilet(s) 61 83 36% increase Sewage 21 27 29% increase Sanitary 4 5 25% increase Sanitation 35 40 14% increase Urine 29 23 21% decrease Latrines 7 4

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 2 - Design & Manufacturing Topics

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sang Hoo Oh, Florida State University; Marcia A. Mardis, Florida State University; Faye R. Jones, Florida State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

, author(s), sponsor(s), measurement scale(s), and citation(s)[3]. The first model, the Advanced Manufacturing Competency Model does not have anydocumentation in its graphic representation. It does not have a detailed title, author, sponsor,measurement scale, and citation. The second model, the Four Pillars of ManufacturingKnowledge has a detailed title at the top. However, it does not have any other documentation.Lastly, the visual display of the NAM-endorsed Manufacturing Skills Certification System showsa sponsor in the bottom-right corner but does not have any other documentation.Tufte Principle 6: Content Counts Most of AllTufte’s last principle of analytical design is “Content Counts Most of All”. It asserts that allanalytical presentations

Conference Session

Teaching Engineering Students and Library Staff: New Ideas and Best Practices

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeanine Mary Williamson, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Natalie Rice, University of Tennessee ; Carol Tenopir, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Jordan Kaufman; Courtney June Faber, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Rachel McCord Ellestad, University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

library research instruction," RQ, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 524-541, 1994.[3] L. R. Kunkel, S. M. Weaver, and K. N. Cook, "What do they know?: An assessment ofundergraduate library skills," The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 430-434, 1996.[4] AASL/AECT, Information Power: Building Partnerships for Learning. Chicago, IL:ALA, 1998.[5] S. Virkus, "Information literacy in Europe: a literature review," Information Research-anInternational Electronic Journal, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1-56, Jul 2003.[6] M. Hepworth, "A study of undergraduate information literacy and skills: The inclusion ofinformation literacy and skills in the undergraduate curriculum," presented at the 65th IFLACouncil and General Conference Bangkok

Conference Session

Best Practices for Chemical Engineering Lab-Based Courses

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael David Mau Barankin, Colorado School of Mines; Tracy Q. Gardner, Colorado School of Mines; Jason C. Ganley, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Oral Report 2 Lab 3 Stats Exam Due Draft 3 Due Draft Rvw 3 Final Report 3 Due Debrief + Writing Week 3 Do Lab 4 Oral Report 4 Lab 5 Workshop Due Draft 5 Due Draft Rvw 5 s Final Report 5 Due Week 4 Do Lab 6 Oral Report 6 Lab 7 Debrief Due Final Report 7 Due Week 5 Do Lab 8 Oral Report 8 Lab 9 Oral Briefing 9Students are further divided into sub-groups or “houses”, two of which follow theMonday/Wednesday schedule

Conference Session

Two-year College Potpourri

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ali Zilouchian, Florida Atlantic University; Nancy Romance, Florida Atlantic University; Dana Hamadeh, Palm Beach State College; Annie Laurie Myers, Broward College; Michael Vitale, East Carolina University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two-Year College

. National Academy of Engineering and American Society for Engineering Education, (2014). Surmounting the barriers: Ethnic diversity in engineering education: Summary of a workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2014.14. National Academy of Engineering; Grand Challenges for Engineering: Imperatives, Prospects, and Priorities. Washington: National Academies Press, 201615. Woolsey, S. A. & Shepler, D. K.; Understanding the early integration experiences of first- generation college students. College Student Journal. 45, 4, 700-714, 2011.16. Antonio, A.L., Chang, M.J., Hakuta, K, Kenny, D.A., Levin, S. & Milem, J.F. , Effects of racial diversity on complex thinking in college students. Psychological Science. 15, 8

Conference Session

Motivation, Identity, and Belongingness

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacqueline Ann Rohde, Purdue University; Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Geoff Potvin, Florida International University; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. Bates, C. Allendoerfer, D. Jones, J. Crawford, and T. Floyd Smith, “The relationship between belonging and ability in computer science,” in Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education - SIGCSE ’13, 2013, p. 65.[4] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Leaving Engineering: A Multi- Year Single Institution Study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 6–27, 2012.[5] B. Geisinger and D. R. Raman, “Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 914–925, 2013.[6] J. L. Smith, K. L. Lewis, L. Hawthorne, and S. D. Hodges, “When Trying Hard Isn’t Natural: Women’s Belonging with and Motivation for

Collection

2018 ASEE Conferences - Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration / San Antonio proceedings

Authors

Mohsen Ayoobi; Ana Djuric P.E.; Mukasa Ssemakula

credits), and three electives (8 – 9 credits). The table also shows the studentlearning outcomes (see Appendix A for detailed definitions) created to fulfill the program’seducational objectives, and satisfy ABET accreditation requirements. The numbers in the tablerepresent the level of a course’s contribution to a given outcome (3 being the highest). Table 1: MCT Program StructureCredit MCT Curriculum Contribution to Student Learning Outcomes s (Total Credit Hours: 128) a b c d e f g h i j k M1 M2 M3 60 Lower Division Science/Technical Courses 27 General Education 25 Upper Division Technical Core 3 ET3030

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: EM Across the Curriculum I

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Seyed Mohammad Seyed Ardakani, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

EML in structural analysis course. The students wereassigned a project competition to design a prototype balsa wood bridge truss for ODOT. Basedon students’ feedback and observation of the instructor, the project competition based on theframework discussed herein can expose students to EML effectively and improve theirperformance.AcknowledgementsThe author acknowledges the financial support of 2018-19 KEEN Cross Network Grant at OhioNorthern University. The input from Dr. Heath LeBlanc is greatly appreciated.References[1] Svihla, V. and Reeve, R., 2016. “Facilitating Problem Framing in Project-Based Learning.”Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(2).[2] Mikesell, D. R., and Yoder, J-D. S., 2011. Teaching dynamics with a

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: Competitions, Challenges, and Teams

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sandra Furnbach Clavijo, Stevens Institute of Technology; Matthew Wade, Stevens Institute of Technology; Kishore Pochiraju, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

business processes necessaryto nurture new technology from concept to commercialization.Concluding remarksThe pitch presentation as a communication technique is an effective tool in the arsenal ofentrepreneurial thinking. Considerable work, preparation and motivation are required to deliveran effective and persuasive presentation of this kind. At Stevens we have developed a companioncourse to the senior design sequence that involves a required participation in a pitch competition,involving prizes of considerable monetary value that are externally endowed in perpetuity. Wehave found that the format of our pitch presentation is well-structured, with both internal andexternal validation. The engineering teams select their best pitcher(s) to represent

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Tamer Omar, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Abdelfattah Amamra, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Kristina Rigden, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Thomas Ketseoglou, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology

trips. If networkintrusion attacks succeed to compromise IoV systems, intruders will control the autonomous vehiclescommunicating with the infrastructure, and this may lead to serious fatal consequences. Therefore,using an IDS to protect the IoV system is very crucial. In this project, students will use traditional IDSto protect the IoV system.REFERENCES[1] Cisco, "Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Trends, 2017–2022 White Paper," 2019.[2] IBM, "The demand for cybersecurity professionals is outstripping the supply of skilled workers," 2019.[3] T. Omar, S. Venkatesan and A. Amamra, "Development of Undergraduate Interdisciplinary Cybersecurity Program: A Literature Survey," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Richard Zhao, Pennsylvania State University; Faisal Aqlan, Pennsylvania State University; Lisa Jo Elliott, Pennsylvania State University; Ethan James Baxter, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering

DescriptionWe designed the VR simulation to mirror the physical simulation of the four-member teamproduction process. The VR simulation was built in the Unity game engine in the 2018 Long TermSupport release. The simulation worked both with the HTC Vive VR headset and the Oculus RiftS headset, the two most popular virtual reality platforms. For this section, we use "user" to referto a student or a participant using the VR simulation. The simulation was designed for thesimultaneous participation of four users, although two to three users would be able to participatewith some adaptation. Each user wore either an HTC Vive headset or an Oculus Rift S headset.The headsets could be mixed. Through the headset, each user was presented with a shared

Conference Session

2-Year College Division: Workforce Pathways and ATE

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Cynthia Kay Pickering, Science Foundation Arizona Center for STEM at Arizona State University; Elaine L. Craft, Florence-Darlington Technical College; Caroline Vaningen-Dunn, Arizona State University; Anna Tanguma- Gallegos, Arizona State University; Emery DeWitt, Florence-Darlington Technical College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two-Year College

students need and create a learning environment that is both academically rigorousand culturally balanced. ​Concrete examples showed how STEM faculty have used results oftheir student surveys and other practices to adapt their course(s) to be more culturally responsive,helping students feel welco​me, respectful of each other's culture and backgrounds, engaged withSTEM, and prepared for the cultures they may encounter as they transition to the workforce.Thirty-eight post webinar survey responses (a 40% response rate) indicated that the webinarexceeded expectations (47.37%) or mostly met expectations (47.37%). Survey respondentsindicated that their confidence level to introduce culturally responsive instruction into theirclassroom/ institutions