, University of Oklahoma Haley Taffe is an Accelerated Masters student in Biomedical Engineering at The University of Oklahoma. She focuses on first year students and self-reflection opportunities within the classroom to enhance learning. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Examining the Engineering Self-Efficacy, Design Self-Efficacy, Intentions to Persist, and Sense of Belonging of First-Year Engineering Students through Community-Partnered ProjectsAbstractCommunity-partnered projects (CPP) have been used in education from the 1990’s and have beenshown to demonstrate effective learning by working on real-time problems which are diverse andcultural, social, and environmental
. Porter and M. Kilbridge, Eds., Cambridge, MA: MIT Laboratory of Architecture and Planning, 1978, pp. 551–660.[7] S. Dinham, “Research on Instruction in the Architecture Studio: Theoretical Conceptualizations, Research Problems, and Examples,” presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-America College Art Association, 1987.[8] NCTQ, “Classroom Management.” National Council on Teacher Quality, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.nctq.org/review/standard/Classroom-Management[9] B. M. Dewsbury, “Deep teaching in a college STEM classroom,” Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 169–191, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11422-018-9891-z.[10] A. Thompson, B. Sattler, and J. Turns, “Understanding a studio environment: A complex
been used in education to assessstudent understanding of specific concepts and as a tool for curricular planning [10], [11], [12].We focus on the latter purpose.Jonassen and Marra [13] advanced a theoretical perspective on concept mapping grounded in aconstructivist framework. We offer three salient items from this perspective that aim to supporteducators’ creation of concept maps as tools for curriculum design and reflection. Conceptmapping functions from a constructivist perspective in that engaging in this activity presents itscreator(s) with the task of internally negotiating their own knowledge and understanding about aparticular topic or domain [13]. As a result of this negotiating process, they argue that creating anexternal
] R. Robbins, “Peering into the Future: Using Peer Advisors to Assist Our Changing Student Populations,” NACADA Summer Institute, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.nacada.ksu.edu/Portals/0/Events/SummerInst/2012/T1-PeerAdv_PP1.pdf[2] S. E. Kuba, “The Role of Peer Advising in the First-Year Experience,” ProQuest LLC, 2010. Accessed: Jan. 29, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED522152[3] H. Koring, “Peer Advising: A Win-Win Inititative,” NACADA Natl. Acad. Advis. Assoc., 2005, [Online]. Available: https://nacada.ksu.edu/Resources/Academic-Advising- Today/View-Articles/Peer-Advising-A-Win-Win-Initiative.aspx[4] H. Koring and D. Zahorik, Eds., “Peer Advising and Mentoring: A Guide for
). All comparisons between pre- and post- responses for each question were statistically significant (p < 0.0001).We analyzed the open-ended responses to uncover themes related to professional skills andempathetic design. When asked the question in the post-survey “What was/were the mostbeneficial aspect(s) of the course to you?” the overwhelming response by 50 of the 52 totalresponses mentioned that the customer interviews, which were a requirement for the businessmodel reports, were the most beneficial. Several other students mentioned that they will utilizecustomers’ perspectives when working in the future: “The most beneficial aspects [of the course] were definitely from the insights and connections
-2023/[3] F. Chiarello, P. Belingheri, and G. Fantoni, “Data science for engineering design: State of the art and future directions,” Computers in Industry, vol. 129, p. 103447, 2021.[4] J. Dastin, “Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women,” in Ethics of data and analytics, Auerbach Publications, 2022, pp. 296–299.[5] A.-B. Gran, P. Booth, and T. Bucher, “To be or not to be algorithm aware: a question of a new digital divide?,” Information, Communication & Society, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1779–1796, 2021.[6] D. Milmo, “Twitter admits bias in algorithm for rightwing politicians and news outlets,” The Guardian, 2021.[7] Z. Obermeyer, B. Powers, C. Vogeli, and S. Mullainathan, “Dissecting racial bias
., December 2018. [Online]. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED590474.pdf[4] F. S. Education, "2022 Progress report on the implementation of the federal STEM education strategic plan," 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/news-updates/2023/01/31/nstc-2022-progress-report- on-the-implementation-of-the-federal-stem-education-strategic-plan/.[5] Y. Jin, C. Qian, and S. Ahmed, "Closing the Loop: A 10-year Follow-up Survey for Evaluation of an NSF REU Site," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Aug 23 2022 Minneapolis, MN. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/41048. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/41048[6] VEX Robot Event. "Robotics education &
environment in which to properly self-assess? Understanding these questions can provide valuable information to instructors to guidefocus in future course iterations.To answer these questions, a broad knowledge survey was issued in conjunction with a validatedintellectual humility scale. Does the outcome of the IH assessment indicate how students willself report on a knowledge survey? The knowledge survey implemented here considered the self-report levels of students with respect to course topics in a broad context compared to theinstructor(s) estimate of where they should rate themselves. Initial results do not indicatesignificance in correlation between KS deviations from instructor(s) targets and intellectualhumility scores, but there are trends
.2018.00092.[2] CLAS. "CLAS: Collaborative Learning Annotation System." UBC Arts ISIT. https://clas.ubc.ca (accessed June 1, 2023).[3] C. Mulryan-Kyne, "Supporting reflection and reflective practice in an initial teacher education programme: an exploratory study," European journal of teacher education, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 502-519, 2021, doi: 10.1080/02619768.2020.1793946.[4] S. Ledger and J. Fischetti, "Micro-teaching 2.0: Technology as the classroom," Australasian journal of educational technology, vol. 36, no. 1, p. 37, 2020, doi: 10.14742/ajet.4561.[5] H. Crichton, F. Valdera Gil, and C. Hadfield, "Reflections on peer micro-teaching: raising questions about theory informed practice," Reflective
Quality of Life in the Late Life at Day Care Centers of Shiraz, Iran: A Randomized Controlled Trial," International Journal of Community Based Nursing and Midwifery, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 136-145, 2018.[9] R. Charon, "Narrative Medicine: A Model for Empathy, Reflection, Profession, and Trust," JAMA, vol. 186, no. 15, pp. 1897-1902, 2001.[10] L. G. Perks and J. S. Turner, "Podcasts and productivity: A Qualitative Uses and Gratifications Study," Masss Communication and Society, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 96-116, 2019.[11] S. Lemeround and L. Camacho Rourkes, Digital Voices: Podcasting in the Creative Writing Classroom, Great Britain: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2023.[12] S. Tobin and R. Guadagno, "Why People Listen: MOtivations and Outcomes of
. Rodriguez Bua, “El cubano, el rey del invento – MEMORIAS DE UN CUBANO.” Accessed: Feb. 23, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://carlosbua.com/el-cubano-el-rey-del- invento/[11] N. Radjou, J. Prabhu, and S. Ahuj, “Jugaad: A New Growth Formula for Corporate America,” Harvard Business Review, Jan. 25, 2010. Accessed: Dec. 09, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hbr.org/2010/01/jugaad-a-new-growth-formula-fo[12] G. Verma, “Jugaad Thinking: Contextualized Innovative Thinking in India Through Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education?,” in Science Education in India: Philosophical, Historical, and Contemporary Conversations, R. Koul, G. Verma, and V. Nargund-Joshi, Eds., Singapore: Springer, 2019, pp. 209
Harcourt, 2020.[3] R. Rothstein, The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America, WW Norton, 2018.[4] D. E. Armanios, S. J. Christian, M. L. McElwee, J. D. Moore, D. Nock, C. Samaras and G. J. Wang, "Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Civil and Environmental Engineering Education: Social Justice in a Changing Climate," 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 2021.[5] J. L. Martina and J. A. Beeseb, "Moving Beyond the Lecture: Inspiring Social Justice Engagement through Counter-Story Using Case Study Pedagogy," The Educational Forum, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 210-225, 2020.[6] The White House, "Fact Sheet: The Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal," 6 November 2021. [Online
extend this alliance to both inside and outside the CSUsystem. In addition, we are sharing all the curriculum and research with the wider community ofCS educators.ResultsEvaluation plan Our evaluation team includes a member dedicated to evaluating the alliance andstudent related outcomes (Objectives 1, 2 and 4) led by Dr. Hubbard Cheuoua and a memberdedicated to understanding the outcomes related to the faculty learning community (Objective 3),led by Dr. Hug.Evaluation of Objectives 1, 2 and 4: Led by Dr. Hubbard Cheuoua, the evaluation has focusedon gathering formative and summative feedback on the alliance (Objective 4) and impact onstudents (Objectives 1 and 2). Using [31]’s methodology, a set of indicators for early-stagecollective impact
al.’s researcher identity scales, which aim to measure the sameconstructs as in the current research, originally contained 26 total items, but were reduced 16total items following the factor analyses of these scales and those of the related identities(scientist and engineering). One unique advantage of Perkin et al.’s approach is that many of theitems provided a more detailed reflection on the specific context of doctoral education. Forexample, the dissertation advisor is proposed as a critical external source of recognition and thusthe following item was added: “My advisor(s) see me as a RESEARCHER.”2 Similarly, thecompetence scale in Perkins et al. work focuses more on specific competencies associated withresearch, such as delivering
determine the best method of analysis and likely failure location(s). Whenfaced with more open-ended structural analysis problems, students frequently make incorrectassumptions about two-force members, action-reaction pairs, and internal loads that can lead toinappropriate or inaccurate analyses.Problem- and Project-Based Learning in StaticsPrior studies in undergraduate engineering education have introduced problem- and project-based learning (PBL) experiences for Statics courses that involve design challenges [1-8].Collectively, this body of research provides valuable exemplars about how PBL learningopportunities can advance students’ engineering knowledge and skills, yet there remain twosubstantial limitations. First, the prototyping component
task and promote self-regulation to task completion, Azevedo etal.’s research and others [19-21] have shown that the integration of adaptive, pedagogicalscaffolds catalyzes student performance, especially those with low prior knowledge or skill.Distributed scaffolds in project-based learning in the early years of postsecondary engineeringprograms has indicated positive student outcomes related to academic engagement, performanceon key assignments, and development and use of fabrication and prototyping skills necessary forthe profession. Allam et al. [22] found scaffolding in freshman engineering project-basedlearning yielded greater than normal student engagement in all phases of design and in overallproject management. Carpenter et al. [14
Phase 2 to collect data fromfive additional dis/abled STEM graduate students. After inductive analysis of the interviewtranscripts, a comparison with prior theoretical framings of dis/ability found that no single theorycaptured the experiences of the participants. Therefore the prior theoretical frameworks wereamalgamated into the paint bucket theory of dis/ability. In this paper the authors deductively mapselect conceptualizations of the participants' experiences in STEM disciplines to the paint bucketframework.The participantsThe seven participants were seeking master’s and/or doctoral degree(s) (or had previously soughta degree within one year of their interview) in STEM disciplines at institutions in the UnitedStates of America with varying
particularly thosewho participated in follow-up interviews. We believe your input will help mitigate barriers impedingequitable access to, and success within, engineering education for all students.REFERENCES[1] V. E. Díaz, S. McKeown, C. Peña, “The Collection and Use of Student Data on Race, Ethnicity, and Ancestry”, BCCAT e-publications. Available: https://www.bccat.ca/publication/reastudentdata/ [Available as of 23 Jan.2024][2] C. Verschelden, Bandwidth Recovery, Stylus Publishing, 2017[3] K.J. Cross, S. Farrell, B. Hughes (editors), Queering STEM Culture in US Higher Education, Routledge, 2022[4] J. Chen, J. M. Widmann, B.P. Self, “Intelligence Is Overrated: The Influence of Noncognitive and Affective Factors on Student Performance
. Zhyvotovska, “An intersectional technofeminist framework for community-driven technology innovation,” Comput. Compos., vol. 51, pp. 43–54, 2019.[9] S. A. Morimoto, A. M. Zajicek, V. H. Hunt, and R. Lisnic, “Beyond Binders Full of Women: NSF ADVANCE and Initiatives for Institutional Transformation,” Sociol. Spectr., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 397–415, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1080/02732173.2013.818505.[10] M. F. Fox and C. Colatrella, “Participation, performance, and advancement of women in academic science and engineering: What is at issue and why,” J. Technol. Transf., vol. 31, pp. 377–386, 2006.[11] NSF, “Making Visible the Invisible - Understanding Intersectionality,” National Science Foundation, Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science
system. ● Probability of Transit (p(T)): This parameter measures the probability the student learns the skill after attempting a problem related to that skill. ● Probability of Guess (p(G)): This parameter accounts for the likelihood that the student guesses the answer correctly without actually knowing the skill. It helps distinguish between true knowledge and lucky guesses. ● Probability of Slip (p(S)): The slip parameter is the probability that the student, despite knowing the skill, incorrectly answers a problem. This could be due to mistakes, misunderstandings, or other factors unrelated to their actual knowledge level.Each of these parameters must be initially estimated for each student model variable. ForThermoVR
, J., Bornholdt, S., 2002. Dynamics of Social Networks. Complexity, 8(2), 24-27.9. Hollis, A. (2001). Co-authorship and the output of academic economists. Labour Economics, 8(28), 503–530.10. Jisiek, B.J., Newswander, L.K., & Borrego, M. (2009). Engineering education research: discipline, community, or field? Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 32-59.11. Johri, A. (2010). Creating theoretical insights in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 183-184.12. Mele, S., Dallman, D., Vigen, J., & Yeomans, J. (2006). Quantitative analysis of the publishing landscape in high-energy physics. Journal of High Energy Physics, 12, 1–23
] Rowell, G. H., Perhac, D. G., Hankins, J. A., Parker, B. C., Pettey, C. C., and Iriarte-Gross, J. M. 2003.Computer-related gender differences. Proceedings from SIGCSE’03, Reno, Nevada, February 19-23.[5] Backnak, R., Chappa, E. and De La Rosa, K. 2009. Exposing K-12 students to science and engineering.Proceedings from 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, Texas, October 18-21.[6] Cantrell, P. and Ewing-Taylor, J. 2009. Exploring STEM career options through collaborative highschool seminars. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3): 295-303.[7] Heersink, D. and Moskal, B. 2010. Measuring high school students’ attitudes toward computing.Proceedings from SIGCSE’10, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.[8] Maxim, B. R. and Elenbogen, B. S
included with the letter. 2. When a signed consent form has been received from the student and his/her parent(s), a Participant ID will be assigned to the student. 3. Depending on the availability of computer labs, the students may have the opportunity to take the survey during class time. If so, only the representative from the University is present. No one from the high school is present in the classroom. All students are informed that participation is strictly optional. If a computer lab is not available, participants are asked to take the survey outside of regularly scheduled class time on any computer with internet access allowing for full privacy. 4. The ENGR 102 HS instructors do not know which of their
0 0 Strongly Disagree No Opinion Agree Strongly Disagree Agree Figure 7: Q5 - “Small group discussion(s) of the case helped me understand the specific course topics” 30 25 2009 2010 20 20 Total 15 12 10 10 10 8 5 4 4
of reflection isthen the attempt to make meaning from the situation and incorporate the experience into alteredknowledge structures or assumptions 25. Atkins 27 describes this as “an awareness ofuncomfortable feelings and thoughts is followed by a critical analysis of feelings and knowledgeleading to the development of a new perspective” (p 1191).The moment that can initiate the reflective or experiential learning process is thus the emotionaldisturbance and the particular feelings experienced in a situation. In Schön‟s description, thereflective practitioner ideally “allows himself” to experience these emotions and is aware of theirmeaning for his learning process. Returning to the difficulties that students experience withreflection, we
treatment for thosewho have not been exposed to the details of engineering licensure.It should be recognized that the specific requirements of each state vary. This paper describes avariety of requirements or provisions applicable to “some” or “many” states, and presents“typical” requirements. For a definitive answer to any question regarding state licensurerequirements, the specific statute and rules for that state should be reviewed. Full information istypically available on state Board of Licensure of Professional Engineers (“PE Board”) websites.2.0 History and Purpose of Engineering LicensureAs a result of well publicized construction failures with fatalities in the late 1800’s and early1900’s, states began to adopt engineering licensure laws
Development Corporation. http://www.themedc.org/News-Media/Press- Releases/Detail.aspx?ContentId=e6be3d27-3711-4bf2-88e4-7e6e6dc2e3c7/. Accessed April 13, 2010.13. http://www.dsireusa.org/library/includes/topic.cfm?TopicCategoryID=6&CurrentPageID=10&EE=1&RE=1/. Accessed April 13, 2010. Page 22.641.1314. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-of-President-Barack-Obama-Address-to-Joint-Session- of-Congress/. Accessed April 13, 2010.15. J. Makansi and J. Abboud, 2002, “Energy storage: The missing link in the electricity value chain,” An ESC White Paper, May, 2002, Energy Storage Council.16. S. Teleke
designs andbuilds custom apparatuses, such as a rig for 2 DOF torsional system developed by Souza et al.4Also, with a custom apparatus, custom instrumentation and transducers are required – which mayor may not be research caliber instruments. One unique apparatus that the author experienced asa graduate student at The Pennsylvania State University in the 1990’s used an air-hockey liketrack to connect mass elements with springs and measured using accelerometers and a 2-channelHP analyzer. It worked well, but a leaf-blower like device was required to produce enough airflow, which was noisy and sometimes would break down. When parts break down on customapparatuses, repair or replacement is usually more difficult than a commercially
: 5 4 3 2 1 STR. AGREE AGREE DISAGREE S. DISAGREE UNDECIDED Picture Smart - Visual Intelligence √ Word Smart - Linguistic Intelligence √ Number Smart - Mathematical