conjugate action.5. Bearingsa. Rate how well the 3D printed bearings helped you understand the differences in cylindrical vsball bearings.b. Rate how well the 3D printed bearings helped you understand why some bearings can handleshaft angular deflection better than others. Table 1: Fall 2020 Survey Results No Oh Question Responses 1 2 3 4 Opinion Yeah! a 16 0 0 6 10 0 2 1 b 17 0 3 9 5 0 1 c 16 0 0 3 11
Paper ID #32905Evaluation of an EPIC Student Experience to Broaden Participation inEngineering Programs (Work in Progress)Dr. Fethiye Ozis P.E., Northern Arizona University Dr. Fethiye ”Faith” Ozis is a senior lecturer in the civil and environmental engineering department at Northern Arizona University. Dr. Ozis holds a B.S. in environmental engineering from the Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey and a Ph.D. from the University of Southern California, Los Ange- les. She is a licensed Professional Engineer, Environmental, in Arizona. Dr. Ozis enjoys every dimension of being an engineering educator. She conducts
. (1998). Describing and supporting collaborative scientific thinking in parent-child interactions. Journal of Museum Education, 23(1), 12-17.[3] Callanan, M. A., & Jipson, J. L. (2001). Children’s developing scientific literacy. Designing for science: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings, 19-43.[4] Tenenbaum, H. R., Snow, C. E., Roach, K. A., & Kurland, B. (2005). Talking and reading science: Longitudinal data on sex differences in mother–child conversations in low- income families. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26(1), 1-19.[5] Hassinger-Das, B., Palti, I., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2020). Urban thinkscape: Infusing public spaces with STEM
males’ experiences on multiracialstudent teams in engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering,26(4).[12] Cohen, G. L., & Garcia, J. (2008). Identity, belonging, and achievement: A model,interventions, implications. Current directions in psychological science, 17(6), 365-369. 8[13] Wright, M. C., Finelli, C. J., Meizlish, D., & Bergom, I. (2011). Facilitating the scholarshipof teaching and learning at a research university. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning,43(2), 50-56.[14] Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed (revised). New York: Continuum.[15] hooks, b. (2014). Teaching to transgress. Routledge
the class (Fig 2A). Students were supplied with scissors, blank whiteposters and glue. In addition, students were allowed to bring their own supplies such as printoutsand markers. Each group gave a 2 min pitch and were assessed based on the innovation, posterlayout, and presentation skills. All the groups were encouraged to ask questions during thegallery walk as well as vote for their favorite product. This gave students an opportunity toprovide constructive feedback and learn from the work of their peers.Fig. 2: Student posters displaying product innovation. (A) Poster created in 2019 by studentspresenting a concept to help quit smoking by providing a therapy program (text-a therapist). (B)Slide created in 2020 by students showcasing
and self-efficacy survey designed by MUSE consulting and the PI of theNSF-HSI project “Building Bridges into Engineering and Computer Science” was modified forcompounding reward system research. The modified survey contains questions regardingparticipation in co-curricular activities, internships, and non-scholastic factors and barriers. Thesurvey aims to gauge how participation in an organization affects self-efficacy, belonging, andacademic and professional success. The survey contains the elements listed below: a. Self-efficacy b. Belonging c. Amount of other responsibilities outside school and co-curricular participation d. Ease of getting internship(s) as a result of co-curricular participation 2. Case Study InterviewThe
, we plan to evaluate secondary outcomes such as student attitude andengagement with both the process of reflection and SBG, as well as the quality of reflectionsacross offerings of a course with different reflection requirements.MethodsCourse and student populationThis ongoing study is being performed in an introductory experimental design laboratory coursethat is required for sophomore undergraduate Biomedical Engineering students at NorthwesternUniversity. This course is offered twice a year with the same instructors and enrolls 20-40students per offering. Students are grouped depending on the quarter in which they enrolled inthe course (Quarter A “QA” or Quarter B “QB”) and there are nominal differences betweengroups. Northwestern’s
5 1 2 (a) (b) (c)Figure 1: The user interface of VolumeVisual (study component). (a) Screenshot with Cutting Plane unfolded onthe control panel. (b) Unfolded Lighting Parameters and Viewing Parameters controls. (c) Unfolded VolumeRendering and Isosurface Rendering controls along with the display of data set information.Figure 1 (a) shows a screenshot of the VolumeVisual interface with three major parts: a header bar on the top, twoside-by-side rendering panels, and a scrollable control panel on the right. The top bar displays the VolumeVisual logoand hints about how to change the view with mouse, keyboard, or
had been divided into seven sections of no more than 22 students each, with lab times des-ignated Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday afternoon and evenings. Each and every section hada remote option, meaning there was no formal distinction between students taking the course re-motely vs. in person. In fact, as the semester started, it was clear that in-person students might needto switch to remote learning if required to quarantine or isolate due to exposure to the Covid-19. Atotal of 11 lab stations were set up including 7 in the Thermal Fluids Lab and 4 new stations in asecond room on the same floor. This allowed half of the students in a section to be in lab simultane-ously. Thus, the students were divided into A and B groups and put on an
AnalysisAnalysis began by dividing time segments into episodes by design stages embedded within ourprogram – (a) Define the problem; (b) Brainstorm solutions, requirements, constraints, andmaterials; (c) Prototype; Test and redesign; and (d) Communicate [35]. Next, three members ofthe research team wrote analytical memos, which allowed each individual to document,articulate, and question their interpretations of the data, free from any risk of making erroneousdecisions based on some predefined codes [36], [37]. We noted both verbal and non-verbal actsof communication in our memos, particularly around how caregivers interacted with their child,volunteers, and members of the research team, as interactions are the basic unit of analysis insymbolic
, and A. Elby, “Problem-solving rubrics revisited: Attending to the blending of informal conceptual and formal mathematical reasoning,” Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Educ. Res., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 010105, 2013, doi: 10.1103/physrevstper.9.010105.[13] M. Besterfield‐Sacre, J. Gerchak, M. R. Lyons, L. J. Shuman, and H. Wolfe, “Scoring concept maps: An integrated rubric for assessing engineering education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 105–115, 2004, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00795.x.[14] B. M. Moskal and J. A. Leydens, “Scoring rubric development: Validity and reliability,” Pract. assessment, Res. Eval., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 10, 2000.[15] S. M. Brookhart et al., “A century of grading research: Meaning and value
differences in labeling retractionsbetween Web of Science, Scopus,Google Scholar, and other increasingly popularscholarly search engines like Dimensions and Microsoft Academics, and to measure theimpact of these practices on the scholarly record.AcknowledgementsWe thank the reviewers for their feedback and comments on our manuscript.References[1] A. Hutchinson, Science Libraries in the Self Service Age: Developing NewServices, Targeting New Users. Chandos Publishing, 2018.[2] A. R. Craft and S. Harlow, “Scholarly communications training: Professionaldevelopment for the next generation of scholars,” Ser. Rev., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 175–183,Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1080/00987913.2020.1806651.[3] B. L. Fong, M. Wang, K. White, and R. Tipton, “Assessing
Paper ID #35304Using NIST’s Shortwave Broadcast Signals to Experience and UnderstandIonospheric Radio PropagationDr. Paul Benjamin Crilly, United States Coast Guard Academy Paul Crilly is a Professor of Electrical Engineering at the United States Coast Guard Academy. He re- ceived his Ph.D. from New Mexico State University, his M. S. and B.S. degrees at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, all in Electrical Engineering. He was previously an Associate Professor of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering at the University of Tennessee and was a Development Engineer at the Hewlett Packard Company. His areas of interest include
= sqrt(Dxy2+(z-d1)2) q1 = tan-1(y/x)Law of Cosine: c2 = a2+b2-2abcos(C) Law of Cosine: c2 = a2+b2-2abcos(C) 2 2 2cos(C) = c -a -b /-2ab cos(C) = a2+b2-c2 /2ab-cos(C) = c2-a2-b2/2ab cos(e) =modd42+a22-D2/(2a2modd4) 2 2 2-cos(e) = D -modd4 -a2 /(2a2modd4) sin(e) = 1-cos(e)2sin(e) = 1-(-cos(e))2 q3 = pi - tan-1(sin(e)/cos(e)) - sin(a3/modd4)+pi/2*-cos(e)=cos(q3) q2 = tan-1(z-d1/Dxy)-Bsin(e) = sin(q3)q3 = pi/2* + tan-1(sin(e)/-cos(e)) - sin(a3/modd4)*B = tan-1((modd4*sin(q3))/(a2+modd4*cos(q3)))q2=tan-1(z-d1/Dxy) - tan-1((modd4*sin(q3))/(a2+modd4*cos(q3)))q2 = tan
. [Online]. Available: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/ 0143-0807/34/4/991/ meta?casa_token=Auf7X046dTkAAAAA:sa_B0f5w-Z8z7OgHk7 4vl5lEoqOFafICbATo2Rh6pB0Z2n8MBNWE0uCnCuXrY6VgzCY1Jp36VBD9FixS2bg[12] J. F. Rhoads, E. Nauman, B. Holloway, and C. M. Krousgrill, “The Purdue Mechanics Freeform Classroom: A New Approach to Engineering Mechanics Education,” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/23174[13] Purdue University, “Visualizing Mechanics,” https://www.purdue.edu/freeform/statics/ visualizing-mechanics/, (accessed April 2021).[14] T. Philpot, “MecMovies,” https://web.mst.edu/~mecmovie/, (unsuccessful access
scope of set criteria andconstraints to collaborate toward innovation; b) utilizing design failure to better understand theproblems in context; and c) contributing as a group to iterative-reflective cycles. Findingscontribute to enhancing K-12 engineering teaching and learning with a focus on collaborativeproblem-solving throughout the engineering design process. Findings of this study also havesignificant implications related to the structure and design of small group collaborative K-12engineering learning experiences.EPISTEMIC PRACTICES OF ENGINEERING IN SMALL GROUP CONTEXTS 2Designing Solutions in Middle School Engineering: An Exploration of Epistemic Practices of Engineering in Small
women and children) to be an engineer [23].Johri et al. (2018) also examined how different users and activities initiate connectivity overTwitter. Authors explored here how a campaign (#ILookLikeAnEngineer) of social mediaactivism aimed at enhancing the diversity of gender within technology gained momentum in itsearly period. The results showed that varied engagement–of user types–increased activity atcrucial moments. These causes are classified into four types: a) Event-based: the arrangement ofthe project with the issue-related offline incidents (SFO diversity, disruption, etc.); b) Mediabased: news coverage of media events (CNN, BBC, etc.); c) Industry based: the webinvolvement of large organizations (Microsoft, Tesla, Google, Cisco, etc
. Markopoulos, I. S. Kirane, D. Balaj, and H. Vanharanta, “Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain Technology Adaptation for Human Resources Democratic Ergonomization on Team Management,” Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., vol. 1026, no. January, pp. 445–455, 2020.[24] I. van Gent, B. Aigner, B. Beijer, J. Jepsen, and G. La Rocca, “Knowledge architecture supporting the next generation of MDO in the AGILE paradigm,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., vol. 119, no. September, p. 100642, 2020.[25] N. Bakhtadze, O. Zaikin, V. Pyatetsky, and A. Zylawski, “Incentive Model of a Project Learning Process,” in 2020 7th International Conference on Frontiers of Industrial Engineering, ICFIE 2020, 2020, pp. 73–81.[26] J. A. P. Gama
engineering education and practice. In R. B. Freeman, & H. Salzman (Eds.) U.S. Engineering in a Global Economy. University of Chicago Press.14. Brunhaver, S., Korte, R., Lande, M., & Sheppard, S. (2010). Supports and barriers that recent engineering graduates experience in the workplace. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin, TX, June 14-17.15. Korte, R., Brunhaver, S., & Sheppard, S. (2015). (Mis) Interpretations of organizational socialization: The expectations and experiences of newcomers and managers. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 26(2), 185-208.16. Lutz, B. D., & Paretti, M. (2017). Exploring school-to-work transitions through reflective journaling
specific details about the hands-on microcontroller basedprojects − the main activities during each of the five days of the camp. These projects areadapted from Monk (2010) 18 . While their description is done in layperson’s terms, they areexciting (as they are designed around LEDs and audio) yet challenging (because students 64 (a) (b) (c)Figure 1: (a) The six participants of WEE-GIRLS 2012 and the first author (holding letter “G”).(b) Listening to prof. K. Katti while touring one of her research labs. (c) Snapshot of participantsusing Arduino boards during one of the hands-on projects.are given assignments to be solved at the end
Paper ID #28231The Centrality of Black Identity for Black Students in EngineeringDr. Catherine Mobley, Clemson University Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a variety of consulting firms, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including the Rand Corporation, the American Association of Retired Persons, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Since 2004, she been a member of the NSF-funded MIDFIELD research project on engineering education
InnovatingCurriculum with Entrepreneurial Mindset (ICE) workshop for their feedback on the initial cardcreation and presentation. The Kern Family Foundation provided financial support for thedevelopment of the four lesson plans and materials.References[1] A. Shartrand, P. Weilerstein, M. Besterfield-Sacre, and K. Golding, “Technology entrepreneurship programs in the U.S. engineering schools: An analysis of programs at the undergraduate level,” in Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Expositions, June, 2010, Louisville, KY.[2] M. Täks, P. Tynjälä, M. Toding, H. Kukemelk, and U. Venesaar, “Engineering students’ experiences in studying entrepreneurship,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 573-598, 2014.[3] B. E. Moyer
citations. ____ Are placed as close as possible to the text that refers to them.Style, Grammar, & Punctuation____ Uses clear and concise sentences.____ Uses words precisely that relate to the report’s purpose, and match audience’s background.____ Uses appropriate tone for the UX director.____ Uses correct grammar.____ Uses accurate punctuation.____ Uses accurate spelling.____ Uses APA or IEEE formatting for in-text citations and reference list. Appendix B. Grading RubricPlease check your final report against the following rubric and bring a blank copy to class onpeer review day. Document Assessment Criteria Meets Criteria Features Evaluates the
. Wing, “Research notebook: Computational thinking—What and why,” link Mag., vol. 6, 2011.[7] National Science Teaching Association, “About the Next Generation Science Standards.” https://ngss.nsta.org/About.aspx (accessed Sep. 10, 2020).[8] Common Core State Standards Initiative, “Standards in Your State.” http://www.corestandards.org/standards-in-your-state/ (accessed Sep. 10, 2020).[9] E. R. Banilower, P. S. Smith, K. A. Malzahn, C. L. Plumley, E. M. Gordon, and M. L. Hayes, “Report of the 2018 NSSME+,” no. December, p. 442, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://www.horizon-research.com/report-of-the-2018-nssme.[10] L. J. Ausburn and F. B. Ausburn, “Desktop virtual reality: A powerful new technology for
test.Prior Work: Student Work Samples for the Simulated Classroom EnvironmentStudent work samples are shown in Appendix A; appendices are after references. This includes alist of key design features and results for the teacher facilitating the discussion to consider.Study Context: Instructional Sequence DevelopmentFor this study, we recruited instructors from institutions A and B to teach an instructionalsequence. With no funding to support simulation costs, we did not have the ability to have thePSTs attempt to facilitate the discussion themselves; thus, the instructional sequence focused onMr. Smith and Ms. Green’s discussions. Further, due to time and logistics, we were unable tohave the PSTs do the design challenge themselves prior to
, 2020.[3] Y. Lambrinidou and M. Edwards, "Learning to Listen: An Ethnographic Approach to Engineering Ethics Education," ASEE, p. Paper ID#8224, 2013.[4] J. R. Herkert, "Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies," Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 7, p. 403–414, 2001.[5] N. Gabiam, The Politics of Suffering: Syria's Palestinian Refugee Camps, Indiana University Press, 2016.[6] C. Baillie and M. Levine, "Engineering Ethics from a Justice Perspective: A Critical Repositioning of What It Means to Be an Engineer," International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10-20, 2013.[7] H. L. Brown-Liburd and B. M. Porco, "It's
contexts affect the uptake of the CW within the mechanics community. As discussedlast year, our IUSE project objectives are to:1. Extend the use of the Concept Warehouse (CW) to Mechanical Engineering (ME) and grow by 50,000 student users from diverse populations. To achieve this objective, we will: a. Develop content [at least 300 new ConcepTests] for Statics and Dynamics. b. Continue development of ME research-based Instructional Tools (e.g., Inquiry-Based Activities and Interactive Virtual Laboratories) that help students develop conceptual understanding. c. Serve as a repository for Concept Inventories that can be used by ME (and other) instructors. d. Provide extensive learning analytics for users who wish to perform
CUBOID Figure 1. A Cuboid with Dimensions (a, b and c)In geometry, a cuboid is a solid figure bounded by six rectangular faces: a rectangular box. Allangles are right angles, and opposite faces of a cuboid are equal. It is also referred to as a rectangularparallelepiped. If the dimensions of a cuboid are a, b and c, then its volume is abc and its surfacearea is 2ab + 2bc + 2ac. The length of the space diagonal of a cuboid =In case of a perfect cuboid, where all the sides of the cuboid have equal value, the space diagonalwill be = where l is the length of the side. Let us consider a cuboid with space diagonalvertices A and G. The coordinates of the two vertices are (XA, YA, ZA) and (XB, YB, ZB)respectively
VISUAL AIDS FOR TEACHING POWER SYSTEMS Don L. Stuehm Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58105ABSTRACT Power systems courses teach the analysis of power apparatus andintegration of the apparatus into a power system. Field trips to localinstallations are commonly used to illustrate apparatus to the students.Coordination of the information obtained from a field trip with class-room material is very difficult plus the students do not see a diversityof system designs. This paper presents a method of using visual aidsto enhance the students• conceptual understanding of power systems.Generating the visual aids for
.[7] A. Sverdlik, N. Hall, L. McApline, and K. Hubbard, “The PhD Experience: A Review of the Factors Influencing Doctoral Students’ Completion, Achievement, and Well-Being,” Int. J. Dr. Stud., vol. 13, pp. 361–388, 2018.[8] L. B. Dunn, A. Iglewicz, and C. Moutier, “A Conceptual Model of Medical Student Well- Being: Promoting Resilience and Preventing Burnout,” Acad. Psychiatry, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 44–53, Feb. 2008.[9] J. L. Brockman, A. A. Nunez, and A. Basu, “Effectiveness of a conflict resolution training program in changing graduate students style of managing conflict with their faculty advisors,” Innov. High. Educ., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 277–293, 2010.[10] J. Hunt and D. Eisenberg, “Mental