AC 2012-3046: AN APPROACH TO USING UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTTEAMS TO DEVELOP UNDERGRADUATE LABORATORY EXPERIENCESLt. Col. Kevin A. Gibbons Ret., U.S. Air Force Academy, NexOne, Inc., and CAStLE Kevin Gibbons is a Senior Scientist for NexOne, Inc., in the Center for Aircraft Structural Life Extension (CAStLE) located at the USAF Academy in Colorado Springs. He taught in the AF Academy Department of Engineering Mechanics for four years, where he earned his Assistant Professorship and served as the Director of the Applied Mechanics Laboratory. He currently works as an advisor for a senior capstone research team and mentor to multiple mechanical instrumentation project teams. He earned a B.S. in mechanical engineering with
in the introductory courses of civil engineering. He is also co-teaching the project management and design courses for the seniors. Page 25.1060.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Preparing Students for Writing in Civil Engineering PracticeAbstractThis paper describes a project designed to investigate characteristics of effective writing in civilengineering practice and improve writing instruction for students. The project analyzesdocuments written by civil engineering practitioners and compares them to papers written byundergraduate students in civil engineering
Paper ID #8241Are Australian and American Engineering Education Programs the Same?The Similarities and Differences between Australian and American Engineer-ing Accreditation ProceduresDr. Scott Grenquist, Wentworth Institute of Technology Scott Grenquist is currently performing Sabbatical Research in interdisciplinary, project-based-learning techniques at Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology and The University of Melbourne in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. He is also concurrently an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at Wentworth Institute of Technology in Boston, Massachusetts. Scott received his doctorate
Laplace transforms,feedback control, data acquisition and signal processing. More enlightened courses Page 23.1237.2include labs or long-term projects that challenge students to connect theory to design(Tranquillo, 2007). But one way to create a T-shaped course is to challenge engineers toapply their skills outside of traditional boundaries. With that goal, I challenged myBMEG 350 (junior-level biomedical engineering) students to design and build non-traditional musical instruments.Each student team designed and constructed an instrument that would record biologicalsignals and then transform those signals to Musical Instrument Digital Interface (MIDI
A Finite Element Module for Undergraduates Joseph J. Rencis, Hartley T. Grandin, Jr., William O. Jolley University of Arkansas/Worcester Polytechnic Institute/The Gillette CompanyAbstractThis paper presents a study module that is incorporated into a formal introductoryundergraduate level course on finite element theory and practice. The module consists ofan Integrative Project and Homework Exercises based upon sophomore level education inmechanics of materials. The objective of the module is to support the teaching of thefinite element method and to emphasize assumptions and limitations in the application ofthe technique. The Project centers on a simply supported beam with geometric discontinuities
course. Theseactivities were unique because they focused on entrepreneurial mindset (EM) principles and thealumni’s current careers, rather than directly on course material. Their careers consisted ofconsulting, water treatment, enzyme manufacturing, and data science/project management. Thejigsaw activities provided a way for students to be more engaged in class, develop their criticalthinking skills, and collaborate with their classmates in a low-stakes atmosphere on an ungradedactivity. Student feedback indicated appreciation for real-world problems, as well as learningabout economic factors and decision-making in industry. Additionally, survey results throughoutthe semester showed a growth in students' EM, suggesting that jigsaw activities
learning outcomes lay a strong foundational base thatproves crucial throughout students’ journeys in and beyond academia and in a variety oftechnical disciplines as well. To ensure these valuable outcomes are met, introductory ECEeducators invest significant effort in course assessment and improvement. Such efforts have beendocumented in literature, including developing new lab tools, incorporating project-basedlearning, and proposing new course assessment methodologies and educational interventions.Adopting a student-centric lens, we propose a new methodology for early ECE courseassessment called CARE, referring to the intersecting areas of the most Challenging AndRewarding Experiences that students have had in line with the main course
architecture from the University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee and University of Washington. Van Den Wymelenberg opened the IDL-Boise in 2004 for the University of Idaho and has successfully secured/completed grants for the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance, United States Environment Protection Agency, Idaho Power Company, the Lighting Research Center, and the New Buildings Institute. As part of the Pacific Northwest Integrated Design Lab Network Van Den Wymelenberg has consulted on over 450 new construction and major renovation projects with architects and engineers regarding daylight and energy in buildings since 2000.Ery Djunaedy, University of Idaho Integrated Design Lab - Boise Ery Djunaedy, PhD is a Research Scientist
ASEE.Ms. Elizabeth A Parry, North Carolina State University Elizabeth (Liz) Parry Elizabeth Parry is an engineer and consultant in K-12 Integrated STEM through Engineering Curriculum, Coaching and Professional Development and a Coordinator and Instructor of Introduction to Engineer- ing at the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University. For the past sixteen years, she has worked extensively with students from kindergarten to graduate school, parents, preservice and in- ser- vice teachers to both educate and excite them about engineering. As the Co-PI and project director of a National Science Foundation GK-12 grant, Parry developed a highly effective tiered mentoring model for graduate and
Higher Education as the Senior Project Associate under Project Directors Lisa R. Lattuca and Patrick T. Terenzini on two NSF-funded stud- ies of engineering education: Prototype to Production and Prototyping the Engineer of 2020. She also worked with colleagues Lisa Lattuca, Patrick Terenzini, and J. Fredericks Volkwein on the Engineering Change study, a national study of the impact of engineering accreditation standards on student learning and engineering programs. Betty completed her Ph.D. in Higher Education at Penn State with a minor in Educational Psychology and graduate certificate in Institutional Research in May 2008. She was the recipient of graduate fellowships from both the Joseph M. Juran Center for
teacher educator, she has added engineering to her elementary and early childhood science methods courses, and developed a Teaching Engineering Design course for middle school pre-service teachers in a science track. Since 2008, she has partnered with Harford County Public Schools in Maryland on the SySTEmic Project, a district-wide project to implement elementary engineering instruction using EiE units of instruction. More recently, she has provided science and engineering professional development to Tunbridge Public Charter School, Baltimore City, and to Cecil County Public Schools, Maryland. Her research largely examines factors that support and those that hinder elementary teachers as they learn to teach
teaching approaches of engineering faculty. Dr. McKenna received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Drexel University and Ph.D. from the University of California at Berkeley.Betty J Harper, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Betty Harper is the director of Student Affairs Research and Assessment at Penn State. Prior to assuming this role, Betty worked in Penn State’s Center for the Study of Higher Education as the Senior Project Associate under Project Directors Lisa R. Lattuca and Patrick T. Terenzini on two NSF-funded stud- ies of engineering education: Prototype to Production and Prototyping the Engineer of 2020. She also worked with colleagues Lisa Lattuca, Patrick Terenzini, and J
competency development via education and training; interactions between humans and technology; and conceptualization of leadership in engineering. Supported by more than $7.5M in federal funding and with results disseminated across more than 100 refereed publications, her research aims to develop and sustain an effective engineering workforce with specific emphasis on inclusion. She has over ten years of construction and civil engineering experience working for energy companies and as a project management consultant; nearly 20 years of experience in academia; and extensive experience leading and conducting multi-institutional, workforce-related research and outreach. She holds civil engi- neering degrees (BS, MS, PhD
research is associated with the Modernization of Undergraduate Education Program(PMG), supported by FULBRIGHT, CAPES, and U.S. Embassy in Brazil [26]. Industrialengineering at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul is one of the participatingcourses. This public university has participated in this project since 2019, with professors onmissions to partner with North American institutions [26], [27]. 2. MethodologyTo investigate whether the teaching strategies present in North American universities can beused in Brazilian universities, an investigation of different necessary factors was carried outin loco. For this, we used a qualitative and descriptive study to highlight the main points usedby these teaching methodologies from the perception
Paper ID #34617An Integrated Vision of Management and Leadership for Delivering21st-century Civil InfrastructureMr. Michael B. O’Connor, New York University Michael O’Connor, Retired Professional Civil Engineer (Maryland and California), M.ASCE, is a mem- ber of the ASCE Committee on Developing Leaders, History and Heritage, Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (CEBoK), and Engineering Grades. Michael has been a practicing Civil Engineer with over 50 years of engineering, construction, and project management experience split equally between the pub- lic and private sectors. Programs ranged from the San Francisco Bay Area
beginning and end of the semester. Coursebelonging and engineering identity was higher among first-generation and low-income studentsin EMath on the pre survey. Course belonging and math confidence increased on the post survey.Among students enrolled in an engineering projects course in fall 2018, at the end of thesemester students also enrolled in EMath had higher private regard and group identification (twomeasures of identity) compared to students not enrolled in EMath; the largest difference wasamong URM students. The results indicate that EMath might provide a supportive environmentwith benefits to students’ engineering identity, although confounding factors of additional cohortprograms and intersectional identities are complications to the
awareness was used as segue into a personal communication stylesinventory activity.Social Media AssignmentsFour assignments involved a deliverable produced by social media. The first two social mediaassignments in the course, Online Presence and Interview a Junior, were individual assignments.The latter two of these, the Alpine Tower Statics Laboratory Wiki and NAE Grand ChallengesVideo Project, involved teamwork and are discussed later in this section of the paper.The goal of the Online Presence Assignment was to help establish expectations for the classstructure and included five simple steps. Students were simply required to upload a picture ofself to the “Class Photos Wiki” in Blackboard, create a LinkedIn profile, create a YouTubechannel, log
engineering design research focuses on developing computational representation and rea- soning support for managing complex system design. The goal of Dr. Morkos’ design research is to fundamentally reframe our understanding and utilization of system representations and computational reasoning capabilities to support the development of system models which help engineers and project planners intelligently make informed decisions at earlier stages of engineering design. On the engineer- ing education front, Dr. Morkos’ research explores means to enhance engineering education, improve persistence in engineering, and address challenges in senior design education. Dr. Morkos’ research is supported by government [National
experience at K&A Wireless as a research associate in Albuquerque (USA). Additionally, he has profes- sional experience at Hitachi Automotive Systems America as an Intern in Research & Development in Detroit (USA) and Senior Product Engineer at Fiat Chrysler Automobiles in Brazil. He served as the President of Student Platform for Engineering Education Development (SPEED). Before joining SPEED, Claudio served as co-founder of the Student Chapter of the Brazilian Automation Society. Among his many achievements, his project was awarded the Best Student Initiative for Engineering Students pro- moted by Cengage Learning. He received the Leadership Award by ISTEC, and the Young Scientist Award supported by
VP for Finance (2015-2016). He also co-founded the Oregon Chapter of the IEEE Education Society in 2005 and sits on its executive committee, and was Program Chair for the 1st and 2nd IEEE Conferences on Technology for Sustainability. His research activities are focused on electrically conductive adhesives, the electrical conduction mechanisms in discontinuous nanoparticle thin metal films, with applications to nanopackaging and single-electron transistor nanoelectronics, and on an NSF-funded project in under- graduate nanotechnology education. He has edited or co-authored five books on electronics packaging and two on nanodevices, (two of which have just been published in Chinese,) and lectures internationally
Society for Engineering Education, 2015 1 Not engineering to help but learning to (un)learn: Integrating research and teaching on epistemologies of technology design at the margins Abstract Locating engineering education projects in sites occupied by marginalizedcommunities and populations serves primarily to reinforce themisapprehension that the inhabitants of such sites are illiterate, inept,incapable and therefore in need of aid or assistance from researchers, facultyand students. Drawing on the emerging literature on engineering educationand social justice, I examine the stated objectives, content, duration, andoutcomes of exemplar projects
enhancing coastal re- silience to natural hazards. Her research has been funded by the National Science Foundation, National Park Service through FAU Environmental Sciences Everglades Fellowship Initiative, USGS, and The Na- ture Conservancy.Dr. Alka Sapat, Florida Atlantic University Alka Sapat is an associate professor of public administration at Florida Atlantic University. Her research interests include disaster and crisis management, environmental policy and justice, federalism, and social networks analysis. She was a Research Fellow with the National Science Foundation’s ”Next Generation of Hazards Researchers” program and has been involved in a number of initiatives including NSF funded projects on topics of
whether that is simply sketching a deflected shape or describing failuremechanisms. Rather than passively experiencing structural element or system behavior throughpictures, videos, simulations, and small-scale projects, full-scale testing provides students with afirst-hand, lasting understanding of fundamental behavior. Additionally, students also gaininvaluable perspectives often difficult to glean from traditional classroom instruction such asconstructability and tolerance issues. Full-scale testing is essential for student understanding ofstructural engineering concepts and there is a significant need for well-organized experientiallearning opportunities with appropriate scales that successfully illustrate structural behavior. This
experience to his [or her] basic technical training.”113. Project Description ─Workforce Development in Engineering for InnovationDeliberately created in 2000 ─ by the ASEE-Graduate Studies Division, Corporate Members Council, theCollege Industry Partnership Division and leaders from industry and universities across the nation, theNational Collaborative Task Force on Engineering Graduate Education Reform is embarking on a majorinitiative to make this much needed advancement in professional engineering graduate education actuallyhappen in the national interest.3.1 Fixing the ProblemWhile U.S. engineering education is not in crisis at the undergraduate level, it never the less has notattained its potential in formulating a system that facilitates
introduced an extrinsic performance goal that enhancedthe undergraduates’ motivation, but left us able to answer our research question: what are thesimilarities and differences between women and men undergraduates in their intrinsic motivationto perform K12 outreach?MethodsOutreach Project Our study focused on an outreach activity performed in one mid-level course (Strength ofMaterials) within the ABET-accredited general engineering curriculum at a small (less than2,000) private regional liberal arts college. The course had an enrollment of 22 students spanning10 sophomores (45%), 11 juniors (50%), and 1 senior (5%), including 16 men and 6 women(27%). To expose undergraduates to outreach, all undergraduates enrolled in the Strength
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Impact of Research Experience for Teachers with International and Societally Relevant ComponentsIntroductionWe sought to bridge the divide for teachers and their students between secondary science andmathematics content, on one hand, and the engineering of solutions to real-world societally-relevant problems, on the other hand. The expected outcomes for the Research Experience forTeachers: Energy and the Environment project* (RET) included: 1. Teacher knowledge and attitudes toward science and engineering will improve as a result of participating in ongoing engineering research projects for six weeks during the summer and
they have, among other things, conflicting goals, various solutions, and different types of constraints; they then pointed out that solving workplace problems requires comprehensive collaboration and teamwork4. By interviewing 17 newly hired engineers, Korte, Sheppard and Jordan (2008) identified four subthemes describing the problem solving process in engineering workplace: “organize, define, and understand a problem; gather, analyze, and interpret data; document and present the results; and project-manage the overall problem- solving process”6(p. 6). Buckingham Shum, MacLean, Bellotti and Hammond (1997) listed some important features of wicked problems, noting that they: Cannot be easily defined so that all stakeholders agree on the
outcomes for the lecture section. The learning outcomes aremapped to ABET Student Outcomes [5].University catalog description: Students collaborate with faculty research mentors on an ongoingfaculty research project or conduct independent research under the guidance of a facultymember. This experience provides students with an inquiry-based learning opportunity andengages them as active learners in a research setting.Table 3: Course learning objectives for the department-wide one-credit lecture section of theundergraduate research course. The goal statements generally complete the sentence “Uponcompleting this course, students should be able to...” Student Assessment
4341synergistically assisted students in seeing the big design picture and the nuances ofteamwork, leadership and management required in the two-semester senior design(CENG 4115/4315) by analyzing and discussing solutions to leadership issues seenduring the one credit hour CENG 4115 in the fall and public policy affecting engineeringprojects in Texas, business practices that could constrain their capstone project design aswell as how well they have been managing their personnel assets within their team duringCENG 4315 in the spring. Even though some public policy is being covered inenvironmental engineering, the in-depth coverage of public policy and administrationwithin CENG 4341 along with leadership, business practices, asset management andother
society?” [the socio-technical aspect]; “A lot of the previous EMSE stuff has beenvery technical technical” [previous work emphasizes technical elements]; and “…this really nice pre-design senior capstone project where we have a lot of intellectual freedom” [pre-senior design]. We hopethe implications of teaching critical thinking in engineering judgment presented in this paper will sparkthe integration of critical thinking into other engineering curricula.IntroductionCritical thinking is central to engineering education, yet it does not have a single agreed operationaldefinition in engineering education. One useful definition described by Ahern et al (2019) quotingFacione (1990) is: “[critical thinking] is a ‘purposeful, self-regulatory judgment