Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kayla R. Maxey, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

Student

): Proceedings of 121st Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June15-18, 2014.[3] REEFE Consortium, “Rising Engineering Education Faculty Experience,” [February 1,2019].[4] M. B. Baxter Magolda and P. M. King, Learning partnerships: Theories and models ofpractice to educate for self-authorship. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, 2004.[5] M. B. Baxter Magolda, “Self-authorship,” New Directions for Higher Education (SpecialIssue), vol. 166, pp. 25-33, 2014.[6] S. Hughes, J. L. Pennington, and S. Makris, “Translating autoethnography across the AERAstandards toward understanding autoethnographic scholarship as empirical research,”Educational Researcher, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 209-219, 2012.[7] C. Ellis, T. E. Adams, and A. P. Bochner

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tak Cheung, CUNY Queensborough Community College; Dimitrios S. Kokkinos, Queensborough Community College; Michael Lawrence, Queensborough Community College; Paul J. Marchese, Queensborough Community College; Kimberly Anne Riegel, Queensborough Community College; Paul Sideris; Regina Sullivan, Queensborough Community College; Paris Svoronos, Queensborough Community College-CUNY; Rex Taibu, Queensborough Community College; Mangala D. Tawde

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

. Friedman, and A. Ott, “Important but not for me: Kansas and Misssouristudents and parents talk about math, science, and technology education” A report from thePublic Agenda. 2007. Available: www.publicagenda.org/files/important_but_not_for_me.pdf[Accessed January 18, 2019][7] D. G. Markowitz,“Evaluation of the Long-Term Impact of a University High School SummerScience Program on Students’ Interest and Perceived Abilities in Science” J. Sci. Ed. Tech.,13(3), pp. 395-406, 2004.[8] A. M. Jason, B. Johnson, J. D. Lewis, J. A. Clark, J. Munshi-South, Su-Jen Roberts, D.Wasserman, J. Heimlich, and K. Tingley, “Pre-college Urban Ecology Research Mentoring:Promoting Broader participation in the Field of Ecology for an Urban Future”, J. Urban Ecol.,0(0), pp

Conference Session

Track: Pre-college - Technical Session 7

Collection

2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity

Authors

Kristina Rigden, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Mariappan Jawaharlal, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Nicole Gutzke, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Pre-College

between psychological science andeducation: Cultural stereotypes, STEM, and equity,” Prospects: Quarterly Review ofComparative Education, vol. 46, no. 2, p. 215-234, March 2017. [Online].[6] F. Quinn, and T. Lyons, “High school students’ perceptions of school science and sciencecareers: A critical look at a critical issue,” Science Education International, vol. 22, no. 4, p.225-238, December 2011. [Online].[7] S. S. Valenti, A. M. Masnick, B. D. Cox, and C. J. Osman, “Adolescents’ and emergingadults’ implicit attitudes about STEM careers: “Science is not creative,” Science EducationInternational, vol 27, no. 1, p. 40-58, March 2016. [Online].[8] M. Jawaharlal, C. Larriva, and J. Nemiro, “School Robotics Initiative – An outreach initiativeto

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 6: Technology-enhanced Instruction and Assessment

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Watkins, Vanderbilt University; Merredith D. Portsmore, Tufts University; Rebecca D. Swanson, Tufts University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

[pointing at the EDP representation in her classroom]… [The EDP] goes all over the place. It doesn't have to go in that order… [B]ut I find myself telling my kids, now it doesn't have to go in that order. It can bounce and go all over the place. (Interview 2)Alma talked about the EDP as being more fluid and unpredictable than she previously thought.She grounded this with an example of her own experience jumping between the differentpractices of the design process. For instance, while she was creating her final project for the firstcontent course, she found that she had to go back to ask more questions about a part of herdesign that was not working. She incorporated research throughout the design process, ratherthan containing it

Conference Session

Technical Session 12: Teaching and Learning

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Florian Schmidt, TU Berlin; Franz-Josef Schmitt, Technische Universität Berlin; Laura Boeger, TU Berlin; Arno Wilhelm-Weidner, Technische Universitaet Berlin; Nicole Torjus

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

Paper ID #26289Digital Teaching and Learning Projects in Engineering Education at Technis-che Universit¨at BerlinMr. Florian Schmidt, TU Berlin Florian Schmidt is a research associate at the chair Complex and Distributed IT-Systems from the TU Berlin, Germany. He finished his M. Sc. Computer Science at TU Berlin in 2015 and his B. Sc. Computer Science at the Leibniz Universit¨at Hannover in 2012. His main research focus is anomaly detection algo- rithms for high-frequent data streams. More details: http://www.user.tu-berlin.de/flohannes/florianschmidtDr. Franz-Josef Schmitt, Technische Universit¨at Berlin Dr. Schmitt is

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelli Paul, Indiana University; Adam V. Maltese, Indiana University; Karen Miel, Tufts University; Merredith D. Portsmore, Tufts University; Euisuk Sung, Indiana University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

. References[1] L. Archer, J. DeWitt, J. Osborne, J. Dillon, B. Willis, and B. Wong, “‘Doing’ science versus‘being’ a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of science throughthe lens of identity,” Science Education, vol.94, pp. 617-639, 2010.[2] A.V. Maltese and R.H. Tai, “Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science,”International Journal of Science Education, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 669-685, 2010.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690902792385[3] A.V. Maltese and C.S. Cooper, “STEM pathways: Do men and women differ in why theyenter and exit?,” AERA Open, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1-16, 2017.[4] C. Murphy and J. Beggs, “Children’s perceptions of school science,” School Science Review,viol. 84, pp. 109-116, 2003.[5] J

Conference Session

Issues in Mechanical Engineering Technology II

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wei Dai Vian, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Nancy L. Denton P.E., Purdue Polytechnic Institute's School of Engineering Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

pulled to failure, the tester’sdata acquisition system obtained load and deformation data. The gauge length was re-measured(see Figure 3b) for calculating the elongation and final strain. Students identified importantmechanical properties such as yield strength, ultimate tensile strength, and fracture stress fromtheir results. The engineering stress-strain curve of each test was plotted from the results, makingYoung’s modulus another property to consider. Figure 3(a) and (b): Tensile test with extensometer and digital caliper applicationResultsStudents compared the hardness and tensile test results by color, processing method, and 3Dprinting orientation. The HRL value of ABS is 74.9 according to ASTM D785. Differencesbetween the

Conference Session

Mechanics Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Allen Evenhouse, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Nick Stites, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Amy K. Dunford, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Rohit Kandakatla, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jeffrey F. Rhoads, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jennifer Deboer, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

. Education + Training, 56(2/3), 105–121.[3] Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence- based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, D.C.[4] Phillips, J. A., Schumacher, C., & Arif, S. (2016). Time Spent, Workload, and Student and Faculty Perceptions in a Blended Learning Environment. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(6), 1–9.[5] Pombo, L., Loureiro, M. J., & Moreira, A. (2010). Assessing collaborative work in a higher education blended learning context: strategies and students’ perceptions. Educational Media International, 47(3), 217–229.[6] Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Louis J. Everett, University of Texas, El Paso; Norman Love, University of Texas, El Paso; Md Moinuddin Shuvo, University of Texas at El Paso; Vishal Bhimrao Zade, University of Texas, El Paso

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

theactivity. This would leave only the struggling students on-line trying to find help. Data showsthis is not the case. Some of the most active students started with high grades. This isencouraging behavior because the stronger students are on-line and perhaps can provide betterguidance for others.Data showed that very highly active students had initial grades ranging from very low F to highA. Data also showed that those with the highest levels of activity ended up increasing theirperformance. Of the 22 students with activity levels greater than 10, 18 increased their gradesand only 4 decreased. This indicates that there is a benefit to activity. All four decliners amongthe highly actives had initial grades from low B to low A. Three of the four

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John M. Mativo, University of Georgia; Uduak Z. George, San Diego State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

bright and dark sides of leadership: Transformational vs. non-transformational leadership in a non-Western context," Leadership, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 107-133, 2013.[12] B. M. Bass and P. Steidlmeier, "Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior," The leadership quarterly, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 181-217, 1999.[13] M. Dellaert and S. Davydov, Influencing: The skill of persuasion - Building commitment and getting results: White Paper: Center for Creative Leadership, 2017.[14] J. French and B. n. Raven, "Understanding Power," ed. https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_56.htm, (nd).[15] C. G. Murphy and T. Hicks, "Academic Characteristics among First-Generation and Non-First

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session - Assessment

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Sleep P.E., Oregon Institute of Technology; Yasha Rohwer, Oregon Tech

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

. Case 2 – poor clientA small, residential home is experiencing foundation failure. Cracking of walls, misaligneddoors and windows and damaged utilities indicate the foundation is settling. Withoutremediation, the local municipality will condemn the building – making it unsuitable foroccupancy. Using the same criteria in terms of size and capacity as the pool piles, how manypiles should be installed to fully support this residential home? The Google Image search shownto the students for this scenario is shown in Figure 2c-1d. Case 1 – Wealthy Client b a Case 2 – Less Wealthy Client c dFigure 2 – Images shown to students prior to solving Case 1 and Case 2

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeong-Hee Kim, Texas Tech University; Ryan C. Campbell, Texas Tech University; Ngan T.T. Nguyen, Texas Tech University; Roman Taraban, Texas Tech University; Danny D. Reible P.E., Texas Tech University; Chongzheng Na, Texas Tech University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

a response that is organized and coherent. There is no “correct” answer.3. a) What does the term “social considerations” mean in the context of engineering practice? Please briefly define and give an example. b) What about the following additional types of considerations: political, economic, cultural, environmental, ethical? Please briefly define and give an example of each.4. How have social, political, economic, cultural, environmental, and ethical issues typically been considered in your engineering (or other) education? Please discuss each in turn. Please provide a detailed response to the above question (e.g., a paragraph or two as needed). Please express

Conference Session

FOCUS ON EXHIBITS: Welcome Reception & NEW THIS YEAR! 2018 Best Division Paper Nominee Poster Session Sponsored by Engineering Unleashed

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jamie Gomez, University of New Mexico

Tagged Topics

ASEE Headquarters

- and Deep-Level Diversity on Group Functioning,” Acad. Manag. J., vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1029–1045, 2002.[10] C. M. Riordan, “Relational demography within groups: Past developments, contradictions, and new directions,” in Research in personnel and human resources management, M. R. Buckley, J. R. B. Halbesleben, and A. R. Wheeler, Eds. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2000, pp. 131–173.[11] S. E. Jackson, K. E. May, and K. Whitney, “Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teans,” in Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations, R. A. Guzzo and E. Salas, Eds. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1995, pp. 204–261.[12] L. R. Goldberg, “The Development of Markers for the Big-Five Factor Structure

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Design Teams

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Behzad Beigpourian, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Frederick C. Berry, Purdue Polytechnic Institute; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Siqing Wei, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. Vasana and A. D. Ritzhaupt, “A case study of a method for hybrid peer-evaluation in engineering education,” World Trans. Eng. Technol. Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 34–40, 2009.[16] B. C. Williams, B. B. He, D. F. Elger, and B. E. Schumacher, “Peer Evaluation as a motivator for improved team performance in Bio/Ag Engineering design classes.,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 698–704, 2007.[17] L. M. O’moore and T. E. Baldock, “Peer assessment learning sessions (PALS): An innovative feedback technique for large engineering classes,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 43–55, 2007.[18] G. Thomas, D. Martin, and K. Pleasants, “Using self- and peer-assessment to enhance students ’ future-learning in higher

Conference Session

Liberal Education Division Technical Session Session 12

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Megan Keogh, University of Colorado, Boulder; Malinda S. Zarske, University of Colorado, Boulder; Janet Y. Tsai, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

-longengineering design projects courses. ​First Year Engineering Projects​ introduces students to theengineering design process and to problem-solving while working in teams. Second YearEngineering Projects, ​Engineering for the Community​, is a sophomore-level course in whichstudent teams are assigned a client and must prototype a product that solves that client’sproblem. Third Year Engineering Projects, ​Invention and Innovation,​ is a junior/senior levelclass in which student teams design a product and a business in parallel. Team size for projectsclasses typically ranges from four to six students. See Appendix B for course descriptions.Research QuestionsThe primary research question addressed in this study is “How do skill-building workshopsaffect

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Design in the First Year

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joan V. Dannenhoffer P.E., Syracuse University; Sinead Mac Namara, Syracuse University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

increased appreciation for the importance of those skills in their engineering education.Presenting hand drawing as a skill significantly increased the use of sketches in the students’ workon exams, homework assignments, and projects. Future work, with this same cohort of students,to sustain the progress made during the introductory course will be done in two courses that follow,engineering statics and mechanics of solids.References[1] E. Education and E. Education, “Summary of the report on evaluation of engineering education,” J. Eng. Educ., no. January, pp. 74–94, 1994.[2] R. E. Barr, D. Juricic, T. J. Krueger, L. S. Wall, and B. H. Wood, “The freshman Engineering Design Graphics course at the University of Texas at Austin,” J

Collection

2019 ASEE Zone I Conference & Workshop

Authors

Jikai Du; Chad M Walber; Shawn E Thompson; David J Kukulka; Edward Purizhansky

new productdevelopment teams,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 420-433, 2008.[13] B. Thrilling and C. Fadel, 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times, Jossey-Bass,2012.[14] Goleman, Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ, Bantam Books, 2005[15] National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in theNew Century, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2004.[16] A. F. McKenna et al., “The role of Collaborative reflection on shaping engineering facultyteaching approaches,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 98, no.1, pp17-26, Jan. 2009.[17] J. Knight, Instructional Coaching: A Partnership Approach to Improving Instruction,Corwin, 2007.[18] M

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jingyu Wang, University of Oklahoma; Noah C. Golly, University of Oklahoma; Blake Herren, University of Oklahoma; James Ian Macdonald, University of Oklahoma; Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma; Yingtao Liu, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

students quickly learned how to identify theappropriate ASTM standard for 3D modeling of 3D printed testing coupons. ASTM D638(Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics) was followed by the students for the3D modeling of coupons and identifying the exact testing procedure, including load rate andtesting data processing procedure. The created 3D coupon model was used during the 3Dprinting process, as shown in Figure 3 (a). Students printed pristine testing coupon using pristinePLA and ABS filaments purchased online and in-house prepared nanocomposite filament. The3D printed coupons are shown in Figures 3 (b and c).Figure 3. 3D printing of ASTM dogbone coupon: (a) 3D printing process using an FDM 3Dprinter; (b) 3D printed dogbone

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University; Susan Bobbitt Nolen, University of Washington; Christine Kelly, Oregon State University; Susannah C. Davis, Oregon State University; Michelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University; Devlin Montfort, Oregon State University; Ed LeRoy Michor, Oregon State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

), pp. 47-57, 2015.[5] S. P. Lorona, S. B. Nolen, and M. D. Koretsky, “The Two Worlds of Engineering Student Teams.” Proceedings of the 2018 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 2018.[6] D. Holland, W. Lachiocotte, D. Skinner, and C. Cain, Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.[7] E. Michor, S.B. Nolen, and M.D. Koretsky, “Destigmatizing Confusion – A Path Towards Professional Practice.” Proceedings of the 2019 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Tampa, FL (June, 2019).[8] S. Davis, N. Cheon, E. Moise and S. Nolen, “Investigating Student Perceptions of an Engineering

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Megan Patberg Morin, North Carolina State University; Elena Nicolescu Veety, North Carolina State University; Pam Page Carpenter

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

societally relevant researchopportunities to engage unique and diverse cohorts of students into the research community. Notonly does this provide a valuable opportunity for the student, but it brings unique skills andperspectives into the Centers, helping to drive research and innovation.References[1] S. Russell, M. Hancock and J. McCullough, "THE PIPELINE: Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experiences", Science, vol. 316, no. 5824, pp. 548-549, 2007. Available: 10.1126/science.1140384.[2] D. Carter, H. Ro, B. Alcott and L. Lattuca, "Co-Curricular Connections: The Role of Undergraduate Research Experiences in Promoting Engineering Students’ Communication, Teamwork, and Leadership Skills", Research in Higher Education

Conference Session

Mechanics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shuh-Jing Ying P.E., University of South Florida

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

OPERATORSDefinition of Rotation Operator The notations used in the equations are as follows: bold letters represent vectors, adouble arrow on the top of a letter indicates a dyad or dyadic. A pair of vectors written in adefinite order, such as ij, is called dyad and a linear combination of dyads is known as a dyadic.Now, consider that a position vector r is rotated with respect to vector n by angle β to r’. Theangle β is measured in the plane perpendicular to n, containing the ends of vectors r and r’ inthat plane as shown in Fig. 1. Let a be a vector with the direction of n and the magnitude of thecomponent of r along n, so that 𝐚𝐚 = 𝐧𝐧 ( 𝐫𝐫 ∙ 𝐧𝐧 )Let b and c be vectors in the circular plane, which is the top view of Fig. 1a looking

Conference Session

Professional Development for Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeremy Dylan Smith M.S., Virginia Tech; Vinod K. Lohani, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

0 II Preparation Preparation for first use 2 III Mechanical Use Use w/o reflection 1 IV A Routine Reliable use with few changes 4 IV B Refinement Continual adaption & improvement 3 V Integration Collaboration w/ others to improve 3 VI Renewal Large improvement & reevaluation 0Teacher’s Creative AchievementsCreative achievement was found to be low with the sample of RET teachers in the first cohort.The second cohort included much more lifetime creative acheivement and recognition, with twoteachers scoring over ten on the instrument. While the overall

Conference Session

Teaching and Assessment in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew W. Liberatore, University of Toledo; Kayla Chapman, University of Toledo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

innovations are beyond the scope of thiswork, but a significant literature can be found (e.g., [8, 9]).Textbook reading rates for this course have been discussed previously [10-12]. Specifically, highreading rates – median reading rates greater than 90% - have been observed [11], while limiteddata over recent decades show significantly less reading for traditional textbooks [10, 12, 13].While reading rates were reproducibly high for two previous cohorts, several other findings arealso of note. While interactive textbook reading is an effort-based activity and grade, statisticallysignificantly higher reader rates were observed for students earning A and B grades in the coursecompared to C, D, and F cohort [10]. In addition, interactivity allows the

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tiago R. Forin, Rowan University; Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University; Kauser Jahan P.E., Rowan University; Harriet Hartman, Rowan University; Beena Sukumaran, Rowan University; Ralph Alan Dusseau P.E., Rowan University; Sarah K. Bauer, Rowan University; Theresa F. S. Bruckerhoff, Curriculum Research & Evaluation, Inc.; Danilo Zeppilli, Rowan University; Stephanie Lezotte, Rowan University; Danielle Macey

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Education: Changing Terrains of Knowledge and Politics. Psychology Press, 1999. 3. P. Layne, “Diversity by Numbers,” Leadership and Management in Engineering, vol 1 ed. (4), pp. 65-71. Oct, 2001. 4. D. Riley, A. Slaton, and A. L. Pawley, “Inclusion and Social Justice: Women and Minorities in Engineering.” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. Olds, Ed., Cambridge University Press 2014. 5. B.M. Ferdman, “The practice of inclusion in diverse organizations,” in Diversity at work: The practice of inclusion, B. Ferdman and B. R. Deane, Ed. New York: Wiley 2014, pp 3-54. 6. R. Jost, Benchmarks for Cultural Change in Engineering Education. University of Newcastle, 2004

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicole Farkas Mogul, University of Maryland, College Park; David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park; Timothy Duane Reedy, University of Maryland, College Park

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

Paper ID #27406Just Add Context? Analyzing Student Perceptions of Decontextualized andContextualized Engineering Problems and their Use of Storytelling toCreate ContextDr. Nicole Farkas Mogul, University of Maryland, College Park Nicole Mogul is a professor of engineering ethics and Assistant Director of the Science, Technology and Society at the University of Maryland, College Park. Co-author, David Tomblin is the Director of the Science, Technology and Society Program of College Park Scholars at the University of Maryland, College Park. Co-author, Tim Reedy, is a graduate assistant in the Science, Technology and Society

Collection

2019 CIEC

Authors

Christopher LeBlanc

the various configurations. The next laboratory exercises look at thedifferential pairs as amplifiers. In class the use of differential pairs is explored discussing thebenefits over single ended amplification. This leads to a discussion of differential gain,frequency response, transistor mismatch, Common-Mode-Rejection-Ratio (CMRR) and Power-Supply-Rejection-Ratio and also the use of active of passive loads. Finally the discussion ofoutput stages is presented. For the final lab the students will assemble an active load currentmirror that supplies a tail device into an active loaded differential pair feeding a Class-B outputstage a complete differential Operational Amplifier. The students will simulate the gain andfrequency response of their

Conference Session

PSW Section Meeting Papers - Disregard start and end time - for online paper access only

Collection

2019 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Greg Placencia, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Pauline Salim Muljana, Old Dominion University

Tagged Topics

Pacific Southwest Section Meeting Paper Submissions

, pp. 115–127, 2009.[15] D. E. Hammond and C. Shoemaker, “Are there differences in academic and social integration of College of Agriculture Master’s students in campus based, online and mixed programs?,” NACTA J., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 180–188, 2014.[16] B. Simunich, D. B. Robins, and V. Kelly, “The impact of findability on student motivation, self-efficacy, and perceptions of online course quality,” Am. J. Distance Educ., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 174–185, 2015.[17] “Research-Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines,” Washington, DC.[18] S. J. Guastello, Human Factors Engineering and Ergonomics: A Systems Approach, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2014.[19] N. Sclater, Learning analytics explained. New York, NY

Collection

2019 CIEC

Authors

Afshin Zahraee; Lakshman Mapa

laboratories for the programs, benefiting students, or used for facultydevelopment, therefore benefiting the faculty, industry they work with, and students as the classmaterial is up-to-date an on par with new technology and industry needs.References1 Ankrah, S, Al-Tabbaa, O., (2015, September). “Universities—industry collaboration: A systematic review”Scandinavian Journal of Management, Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 387-408.2 https://www.nwiforum.org/why-nwi-13 Bradley, B. (Writer). (2017, June 6). The Border War: How Illinois is losing out to surrounding states [Video file].Retrieved June 20, 2017, from http://wgntv.com/2017/06/06/the-border-war-how-illinois-is-losing-out-to-surrounding-states/4 Latif, N., Zahraee, M, Blades, D, Handley, M., (2019

Conference Session

Faculty Development Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jianyu Jane Dong, California State University, Los Angeles; Emily L. Allen, California State University, Los Angeles

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Constituent Committee

to attend future T&L Academy event (value toother colleagues); 3) The event helped to enhance faculty community in the college. (a) (b) The survey results clearly show that most participants thought the summer workshop was valuable to their self-development and that of their colleagues. In addition, 91% of participants agreed that the T&L event positively contributed

Conference Session

PSW Section Meeting Papers - Disregard start and end time - for online paper access only

Collection

2019 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Jean-michel I. Maarek, University of Southern California

Tagged Topics

Pacific Southwest Section Meeting Paper Submissions

bioinstrumentation laboratory course” in Paper # 12819, 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, Washington, 20152. C. Waters, S.J. Krause, J. Callahan, B. Dupen, M.B. Vollaro, and P. Weeks, “Revealing student misconceptions and instructor blind spots with muddiest point formative feedback” in Paper # 15012 123rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 20163. T.A. Angelo and K.P. Cross, “Classroom assessment techniques: a handbook for college teachers”, 2nd Edition, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, California, 19934. J. Mansfield, T.L. Alford, and N.D. Theodore, “Misconception clarification in online graduate courses” in Paper # 22495, 125th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, 20185. S.J