(CREaTE) in College of Engineering atUTEP in collaboration with the Center for Institutional Evaluation Research and Planning(CIERP) at UTEP.The project has enabled articulation agreements to be established between the partners. Degreeplan checklists, flowcharts, prerequisite tables, and transfer guides are in place for each degreeprogram between EPCC and UTEP. See http://engineering.utep.edu/plaza/circles/degree.htmThe Department of Education provided major support for this partnership project. The goals ofthe project were exceeded in all key areas, and the results have been implemented andinstitutionalized. During the next five years we anticipate seeing growth in the transfer back andforward of our students due to the improvements and
takenotes on theory and example problems presented by the instructor, while about ten minutesmight be devoted to questions and answers. In this way, students are not actively engaged in thelearning process. To try and remedy these deficiencies, we plan to develop an interactive classthat will essentially transform the lecture-intensive course into an “Interactive DynamicsLearning Course” (IDLC) that willa. directly address the hands-on learning approach of ET students,b. enable students to clearly visualize particle and rigid body motion and forces, which theystruggle with in traditional classes,c. enhance their comprehension of key physical concepts, and therebyd. improve their problem-solving skills and grasp of the subject.To
(FSD) transform the inputs to outputsConcept Generation The methods and results of the team’s concept generation effortsConcept Selection Documentation of a systematic selection of the optimal conceptProject Planning Gantt chart showing plan for realizing prototype of the selected conceptDetail Design CAD Models and engineering prints for the prototypeVerification Calculations Calculations or simulations to show that the detail design will result in a prototype that meets the specifications
likely to do their homework in the morning, and lower percentile students tend to stay up later into the night working on them. Anecdotally, these trends are not surprising, but now we can clearly measure them. In our future work, we plan to automate many of the reasonable instructor responses to such data. We may, for example, offer an automated reminder to calibrate if they have not in previous attempts, or we may have the site advise students to do their homework earlier if they’re waiting until the night before it’s due. We are also adding capabilities to detect unit conversion errors, and to notify the instructor when a particular student is having an abnormal level of difficulty so that
research is to improve online IDEs of this sort by adding means ofdetecting student difficulties, improving compile and runtime error reporting, and identifyingsuccessful patterns of code development.Prior WorkThe behavior of student programmers has been the subject of substantial research. An earlyinstance of such work7 compared successive program submissions in a batch-processingenvironment, finding that most changes affected only one or two lines of the source. A laterstudy9 observed and tracked high-level behaviors of high school students in a Pascalprogramming class, and noted that the students spent most of their time editing and running theirprogram rather than planning or reformulating code.Most recent work extracts detailed data directly
student internsrather than using capstone project teams. An arrangement was agreed to: The non-facultyportion of the professional team would provide “hands on” technical direction andsupport; with the Engineering College faculty having controlling oversight – the studentsare still ultimately answerable to the professors.ObservationThe following items highlight pertinent observations by the involved engineering facultyand the supporting sponsor.Murphy’s Law: “If it can go wrong, it will.” And almost every project has somethingembedded that can go wrong (“The best laid schemes (plans) of mice and men / often goawry.” – Robert Burns). The students seem not to be aware of Murphy’s Law. Some ofthis comes from the optimism and enthusiasm of youth. But
planning techniques and finally, the students get to operate the machine themselves tomanufacture the part that they conceived. This tangible final product “rewards” the students fortheir efforts and reinforces their creativity. Fig. 5: Art-to-part demonstration accomplished by the module3.3 Quantifying 3D Space (middle-school students)The machine tool moves in three dimensional space to remove material in a designated location.This requires students to be able to relate the movement of the machine tool to each axis of themachine. Students learn to apply the concepts learned in geometry to be able to move themachine to the location and orientationthey desire (Fig. 6).3.4 Cutting Tool Selection Principles (middle-school
have.This paper is a work in progress; we attempt to identify the relevant engineering education PhDprograms in the country and compare them to understand if there is a consensus on how the fieldis perceived. This initial work will build up into a bigger plan of constructing a full evaluation ofPhD’s programs in ENGE and to measure the impact that the field has had in the engineeringdiscipline. More specifically, in this paper we will answer the following research questions: 1. Do all the PhD programs in engineering education have the same purpose? 2. Are there similitudes between the programs learning outcomes? 3. Are there similitudes between the milestones required to promote the learning outcomes
students. The student would repeat this process of studying andtesting until they scored 100%. This meant that in some cases not all students completed allunits. Unlike Bloom’s LFM, mastery of each unit was considered a sufficient measure of mastery(Keller 1974, 1981).III. Course Set-Up and StructureThe undergraduate physics course in mechanics was a typical first semester course of a two-course sequence for students planning to major in engineering. Topics addressed include motionin one and two dimensions, Newton's laws, work and energy, conservation of energy andmomentum, systems of particles, rotations and oscillations and periodic systems. The coursedrew on student knowledge of geometry, algebra, trigonometry, vectors and calculus. IIIA
businessdevelopment concepts. Marketing is the component of business development function.In order to understand students’ perception towards business development topic, they areasked what business development in construction is8. It is generally not clear and it isinterpreted as the same with marketing. Is it brochure, marketing, advertisement, sales,business planning, client maintenance? The definition given as business development is theprocess of acquiring business for a construction company. This means retaining those clientsthe company wishes to retain as well as acquiring new clients with whom the companydesires to do business. 2) Is business development performed during construction project process
).23Research has supported that capstone courses help students develop teamwork skills and increasecommunication skills and technical competencies. A nationwide survey conducted in 2011 among57 members of the ASCE Department Heads Council demonstrates that when the participants wereasked, ―Where does your department include/plan to include management, business, public policy,and leadership into the curriculum?‖, 68% of respondents chose ―Capstone/senior design,‖ whichmeans that the majority of leadership skills are obtained through capstone courses and designproject activities.26 In order to develop nontechnical skills such as leadership, the objectives of acapstone course should encompass many items, including improvement of team formation, skillsfor
in multiple Collegiate Cyber Defense Competitions and Capture the Flag events and currently is employed as a Re- search Assistant in the BYU Cyber Security Research Laboratory. Sarah is an active member of the BYU Red Team which has participated in several penetration tests for departments on campus, and businesses in the local area. Sarah has come to love both offensive and defensive cyber security and is currently planning on pursuing a Masters degree emphasizing Cyber Security.Samuel Moses, Brigham Young UniversityDr. Dale C Rowe, Brigham Young University Dr. Rowe has worked for nearly two decades in security and network architecture with a variety of industries in international companies. He has provided
courses.References 1. Bennett, S. (2007). Designing for uncertainty: Three approaches. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(2), 165-179. 2. Hearn, J., Lewis, D., & Kallsen, L. (2006). Incentives for managed growth: A case study of incentives-based planning and budgeting in a large public research university. Journal of Higher Education, 77(2), 286-316. 3. Design and Construction, n.d. http://www.colorado.edu/fm/planning-design- construction/design-construction 4. Gransberg, D.D., Jeong, H.D. and Hunter, K.D., Preconstruction Services Estimating Guidebook, Interim Research Report, NCHRP Project 15-51, 2014, 149pp. 5. USGBC, n.d., http://www.usgbc.org. 6. Grimsey D, Lewis MK. Public Private Partnership, the
with undergraduate and graduate students withdisabilities, and acquire accessible technology skills helpful in navigating a college campus andclasses. This transition focus provided additional support to increase student confidence inapplying for a college program. Third, this camp facilitated networking within the VIBcommunity and between these students and potential mentors. Through interacting with graduatestudents with VIB, engineering faculty and local engineering professionals, the students wereable to gain a better understanding of potential STEM career paths.While the pilot program proved successful based on anecdotal information, additional data needsto be collected utilizing more comprehensive assessments. We plan on incorporating
parts of Maine areable to learn about engineering as a potential career. This exhibit is open to all ages and attractsstudents from k-12, their families, and those generally interested in engineering.The UMaine Construction Engineering Technology program also has a booth at a statewideconstruction all trades fair held in the fall for students from vocational regional high schools andother construction trade programs. These students are trade students who plan to enter theconstruction industry. We set up a booth to encourage these trade students to consider entering aconstruction engineering program to learn the management of construction. We use our STEMactivity to engage students in a dialog as to what construction education covers and
students. From student-led design and construction teamsthrough surveys of recent alumni, the methods and results of this single case study can serve as atemplate for development and evaluation of new maker spaces to review as they plan andimplement their own spaces to foster design, innovation, and entrepreneurship skills inundergraduate engineering students.2 Overview of the Design StudioThe Design Studio is a 5,500 square foot student-run space consisting of several interconnectedrooms on the ground floor of a building primarily used to house the mechanical engineeringdepartment offices and labs (Figure 1). It began in 2012 with just one room that was previouslybeing used as a large storage space, and grew strategically as departmental needs
Louisiana Art and Science Museum in Baton Rouge. Adrienne has a Master of Science degree in zoology from LSU, where she studied in the Museum of Natural Science, and an Education Specialist Certification in science education.Mr. James Blake Gegenheimer James Gegenheimer is an MSME Candidate in Mechanical Engineering at LSU. When graduated, James will commission as a Second Lieutenant in the United States Air Force. He will be stationed at Hill Air Force Base in Salt Lake City, Utah. He plans to pursue a Ph.D. through the Air Force and work with the Air Force Weapons Research Laboratory. James is currently a Supplemental Instructor at LSU for Thermodynamics where he has served since 2013. He has worked to improve how
compromising theusefulness of a cross-institutional project.Scheduling and Schedule RequirementsThe curricular changes that the instructor experienced in the transformed course are primarilyembodied by the schedule and scheduling requirements, with key touchpoints being topiccoverage and order. In our analysis, we see the imposition of this schedule quickly give rise to afeeling described consistently as “treading water”. There is a constant pressure to plan classesand learn content which is amplified by the instructor’s preference for having course contentplanned far in advance. Statements like “I feel like I am treading water because most days I amonly one step ahead of the students” (Week 9) and “I am currently only one step or less ahead ofthe
(AAAS) Science and Technology Policy Fellowship in 2012-2013, with a placement at the National Science Foundation.Mr. Samuel S. Newton, Clemson University Samuel S. Newton is an undergraduate researcher pursuing a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. He plans to enter the aerospace industry and is considering a M.S. in Aerospace Engineering. His interests pertain to aircraft design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Uncovering Forms of Wealth and Capital Using Asset Frameworks in Engineering EducationIntroductionThis work-in-progress paper presents the intermediate results from a qualitative research projectfor which we are
methodology – phenomenography. We then discuss our datacollection methods, validity concerns, data analysis procedures, and preliminary findings. Weclose by discussing some implications, limitations, and plans for completing this study.2. Research QuestionsTo better understand the multi-faceted MOOC student experience, we investigate the followingresearch questions: 1. What are student intentions and perceptions of the utility of engagement with online and offline components of this class? 2. How do students describe their learning behaviors while interacting with the online environment, and what reasoning do they give for these behaviors? 3. How are the students using the physical lab-kits, and how can we characterize their
;0.05). The career trajectories of program alumnae are as follows (Table 1). Of those surveyrespondents who are still in high school, 98% plan to enroll in a 4-year college or university, and97% intend to major in STEM, with 32% in engineering and 81% biology or bioscience(multiple selections permitted). There are similar findings for the alumnae who are presently incollege. 100% are enrolled in 4-year programs, with 93% in STEM majors; 64% are biology orbiosciences; and 23% are engineering majors. 56% of the alumnae in college are intending to goto medical school, and 23% are “very interested” in pursuing orthopaedics as a career choice. Forthe 6 alumnae presently in medical school, 5 are “very likely” (n=2) or “likely” (n=3) to
: The Program allowed me to actually see what the science industry is like. I did biology research and organic chemistry research… through the summer bridge program. These opportunities allowed me to learn what kind of environment I prefer in the field. Without them, I'd have probably wasted a lot of money and time trying to go back and pursue another sector of science…. Through industry visits…, I was able to connect with the kind of industry I would like to work in… [They] helped me to define my career goals and develop a plan to obtain them. [The program] has not only impacted my career plans but has
National Association of Schools of Art and Design (NASAD)Architecture, BArch National Architectural Accrediting Board (NAAB)Business Administration, BS, Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of BusinessMBA (AACSB)City and Regional Planning, BS, Planning Accreditation Board (PAB)MCRPComputer Science, BS Computing Accreditation Commission of ABET 1Construction Management, BS American Council for Construction Education (ACCE)Dietetic Internship Accreditation Council for Education in Nutrition and Dietetics (ACEND)Economics, BS Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business
, the subject of which varies depending on the degree programme;mechatronic students have to design an autonomous vehicle that navigates a maze,aerospace systems students have to develop the flight control software for an autonomoussemi-constrained quadrotor. The students are accompanied by the UGS staff, who take thisopportunity to undertake professional development courses, meet with UoG staff to discusscollaborative research projects, review plans for course modifications, and to becomefamiliar with changes in the UoG regulations and policies. Thus, it is hoped that the summeroverseas immersion programme fosters a stronger relationship between the UGS and UoGstaff as well.To insure that the assessment of the courses is identical to that used
Engineering Objectives(SEO) Input Parameters The coach or student discusses the initial input variables of the experiment Measurement The coach or student discusses the plan Strategy the students will use to gather data on their experiment Performance Metrics The coach or student discusses the specific, measured engineering objectives of the projectCoaching Objectives (CO) Experimental Design The coach or student discusses the and Strategy experimental plan for the project Kinetics The
. Instead, the researchers are customizing a University Seminar (US 1100) section, whichis an introduction to the university freshman seminar course, specifically for engineering andengineering technology majors while exploring research questions related to the development ofstudent design self-efficacy. This paper presents this work in progress including preliminaryresults from pre- and post-project engineering design self-efficacy measures of the initial cohort,lessons learned, and plans for future work.BackgroundThe Texas State STEM Rising Stars project is using a three-sided organizing framework, asshown in Figure 1, to guide the interventions and its associated research plan. This framework isbased upon Swail’s geometric model for student
included pre-, in- and post-class documents and activities, designed with the threecolumn lecture planning table. Table I was applied to the point defect formation energycalculation module taught in the Structure of Materials course.Students were required to study the basic modeling concepts before the class. The first 15minutes of the class were for a quiz, followed by quiz solution analysis and explanation. This in-class quiz assessed students’ understanding of the modeling concepts they self-studied before theclass. The instructor also answered students’ questions. The rest of the time in the class was forhands-on practice. The in-class exercises were designed for different course topics and learningoutcomes. For example, the course topic was
) BatterySizingandPowerConsumption In a future offering of this course, a pilot is planned that will introduce the project at thebeginning and have a variety of topics available to the students to request. Half of the classes willbe preplanned and dictated by course objectives; however, for the other half of the classes, thestudents will choose topics that are covered in greater detail in later classes and are only presentto improve performance by first-year students on their project. A list of potential “Maker” topicscan be seen in Table 2. This is to be done instead of having a strict course schedule with alltopics planned out. The students in the class will be able to vote and request the topics that theybelieve to be the most important to learn next. In essence
equipment. We encouraged use of the videobefore, during, and after the lab. The content in the video added to content currently used in thecourse, and it was intended to replace some of the one on one interaction with instructors onbasic concepts. More videos will be developed in the future and the method of quizzing studentson the material is being developed.Analysis of ResultsThe video implemented in this course and the future videos that are planned are intended toprovide a visual connection between concepts and the physical world. It is anticipated that theflipped classroom resources will improve students’ understanding of the material, facilitate peerdiscussion, and allow for faster engagement in the hand-on components of the course. With
in technology leadership andinnovation skills including tools for process improvement and quality management.As well, the program incorporated other innovations beyond its delivery system, schedule andfee structure. To be consistent with its goal of developing practical skills and knowledgeimmediately, or at least quickly, applicable to business and industry, its plan of study2incorporated a base of essential core studies, flexible and easily tailored courses to insurerelevance to emerging technologies, and a guided, industry focused applied research anddevelopment project called simply the Directed Project (DP). The latter DP was deliberatelydesigned to require work commensurate to what is typically expected of a master’s degreethesis3