concepts together with a pen and paper approach towards problem solving. Yet, the practicalapplication of these principles and concepts undergoes testing during the design thinking aspectof project or laboratory components within the courses. In addition to this many traditionaluniversity programs need to evolve their teaching methods to equip students with the innovative,creative, and integrated engineering-business skillsets that thrive in today's technology-drivenglobal economy. The entrepreneurial skillset is highly desirable by the companies todayespecially those employed in R&D7,8,9. Most of the labs which are integrated into the engineeringcourses have some common themes as their objectives engage students in activities related to
, regularly choose this room for study. They often choose thisfacility over the computer laboratory next door. Learning spaces, like this one, that facilitatealternative pedagogies are greatly needed. The basic configuration and concepts used in this Page 13.280.2design could easily be extended to other facilities. The design could be scaled up to a larger roomwith more clusters.IntroductionA wide range of education literature discusses the importance of inductive, cooperative andactive learning approaches in the classroom. In the review article, “The Future of EngineeringEducation Part 2. Teaching Methods that Work,” Felder, et al. present seven
Paper ID #41093Project-Based Learning in a Multidisciplinary Two-Semester First-Year ExperienceDr. Mohammad Heshmati, Mississippi State University Dr. Mohammad Heshmati is an assistant professor in Swalm School of Chemical Engineering at Mississippi State University (MSU). His background is in Petroleum Engineering academia and industry settings. He is currently teaching Petroleum and Chemical Engineering courses at MSU and performs research in the fields of energy and dynamics of fluid flow in porous structuresDr. Bill B. Elmore, Mississippi State University Bill B. Elmore, Ph.D., P.E., is an Associate Professor and Director
Paper ID #38103Reinvigorating Energy Teaching via Research with Engineers (Evaluation)Catherine Lynn BieseckerJustin McFaddenDr. Thomas Tretter, University of Louisville Thomas Tretter is professor of science education and director of the Gheens Science Hall & Rauch Plan- etarium at the University of Louisville. His scholarship includes collaborative efforts with science and engineering faculty targeting retention of STEM majors in entry-level STEM courses.Dr. Brian Scott Robinson, University of Louisville Brian Robinson is an Associate Professor with the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the Uni- versity of
AC 2008-1905: TEACHING RESEARCH SKILLS IN SUMMERUNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH PROGRAMSJacqueline Fairley, Georgia Institute of TehnologyJill Auerbach, Georgia Institute of TechnologyAdrianne Prysock, Georgia Institute of TechnologyLeyla Conrad, Georgia Institute of TechnologyGary May, Georgia Institute of Technology Page 13.1173.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Teaching Research Skills in Summer Undergraduate Research ProgramsAbstract High-quality research skills are an essential component in successfully navigating thegraduate school process. The focus of this work is to describe a successful approach toteaching research skills to undergraduate
AC 2009-2331: STUDENTS CREATE PROBLEMS FOR TEACHING ANDLEARNINGClaire Komives, San Jose State UniversityErik Fernandez, University of Virginia Page 14.1086.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009AbstractThe BioEngineering Educational Materials Bank (BioEMB) is a web repository of biologicalapplications that has been designed to enable chemical engineering students to learn to applytheir chemical engineering principles to biological processes and problems. In spite of gettingmany offers of contributions to the website from Biochemical Engineering faculty, only very fewproblems were submitted except by a handful of faculty. In order to expand the contributions tothe website
Paper ID #25716Teaching Social Responsibility in a Circuits CourseDr. Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University and the M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford Univer- sity. She is currently Professor and Chair of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her teaching and research interests include inclusive pedagogies, electronics, optoelectronics, materials sci- ence, first year engineering courses, feminist and liberative pedagogies, engineering student persistence, and student autonomy. Her research has been sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Dr
Paper ID #17278Teaching Project Survival Skills: Lessons from ’The Martian’Prof. Wayne Paul Pferdehirt, University of Wisconsin, Madison Wayne P. Pferdehirt is the director of distance degree programs for the College of Engineering and director of the Master of Engineering Management program at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Wayne also co-teaches the Master of Engineering Management program’s Technical Project Management and Foundations of Engineering Leadership courses. Prior to joining UW-Madison, Pferdehirt directed the Midwest solid waste consulting services of an international environmental consulting firm and
AC 2007-2005: ENGINEERING DESIGN: ARE WE TEACHING THE RIGHTSTUFF?Rudolph Eggert, Boise State University RUDY J. EGGERT, Ph.D., P.E. is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Boise State University. His research interests include Engineering Design, Optimization, Design Theory and Methodology, Machine Design, and Probabilistic Analysis. In addition to a number of conference papers and journal articles he authored Engineering Design, published by Prentice Hall in 2004. A long time member of ASEE, he is the 2006/7 Design in Engineering Education Division Chair-Elect. Page
Teaching Freshman Engineering Students to Solve Hard Problems Robert Leland1, James Richardson2, Tan-Yu Lee3, John Dantzler4 1 Electrical and Computer Engineering Dept. /2Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept./3Mathematics Department, University of Alabama/4Censeo Research, Inc.1. IntroductionThe typical freshman engineering student encounters subject matter that is more complex and delivered ata faster rate than what they experienced in high school. Combined with weak problem solving skills andinadequate study habits, this can be a recipe for disaster. “Judgment day” for many students occurs whenthe first round of midterms are handed back
AC 2012-4501: TEACHING SOFTWARE SECURITY: A MULTI-DISCIPLINARYAPPROACHDr. Walter W. Schilling Jr., Milwaukee School of Engineering Walter Schilling is an Assistant Professor in the Software Engineering program at the Milwaukee School of Engineering in Milwaukee, Wis. He received his B.S.E.E. from Ohio Northern University and M.S.E.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Toledo. He worked for Ford Motor Company and Visteon as an Embed- ded Software Engineer for several years prior to returning for doctoral work. He has spent time at NASA Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, Ohio, and consulted for multiple embedded systems companies in the Midwest. In addition to one U.S. patent, Schilling has numerous publications in
Session 1454 A Multidisciplinary Approach to Teaching Invention and Entrepreneuring Edward Lumsdaine Michigan Technological University (USA) and University of Nottingham (UK)AbstractThis paper describes the context, format, experiences, and outcome of three multidisciplinaryteam project-based pilot courses focused on teaching entrepreneurial skills and invention:1. ME 490 “Invention and Entrepreneuring,” co-taught by two professors (from engineering and business) at Michigan Tech for multidisciplinary students during fall quarter 1999.2. N1D041 “Creative Problem
World. Science Ed., 82, 407-416.15 Hurd, P.D. (2002). Modernizing Science Education. J. Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 3-9.16 NASA Langley Research Center, MY NASA DATA web site, http://mynasadata.larc.nasa.gov/index.html Page 22.1376.13 (accessed 07/09).17 NASA Science for Educators, Earth Science Education Catalog, http://nasascience.nasa.gov/educators/earth- science-education-catalog , (accessed 07/09).18 NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Climate Time Machine, http://climate.jpl.nasa.gov/ClimateTimeMachine/climateTimeMachine.cfm (accessed 07/09).19 U.S. Global Climate Change Research Program
Page 4.557.3Although a secondary input, facilities influence the learning process (Gupta (1994); Gilbert et al.(1993)). Hence, they should be considered during course planning and be evaluated; theadministrative support system has an important role on this aspect. Facilities include theclassrooms where the classes are delivered, laboratories, etc. as well as the environment inthose places (Gupta, 1994). They also include equipment needed such as computers,audio/visual, and lab equipment. Nonetheless, a professor should understand that preparationand enthusiasm are key to teaching; the equipment merely supports it.Learning objectives define specific topics for the learning outcomes that must be achieved. Thelearning outcomes are the specific
Paper ID #9786Understanding Teaching Assistants’ Assessment of Individual Teamwork Per-formanceMs. Patricia Kristine Sheridan, University of Toronto Patricia Kristine Sheridan is a PhD Candidate with the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto. She holds a BASc and MASc in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Toronto. She is a member of the teaching team and a course developer for the Praxis cornerstone design courses.Dr. Doug Reeve P.Eng., University of Toronto Professor Reeve is the founding Director of the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) at
AC 2010-489: HOW WE TEACH: FRESHMAN INTRODUCTION TO CHEMICALENGINEERINGDavid Silverstein, University of Kentucky David L. Silverstein is the PJC Engineering Professor and an Associate Professor of Chemical & Materials Engineering at the University of Kentucky. He is assigned to the College of Engineering’s Extended Campus Programs at Paducah, Kentucky. Silverstein received his B.S.Ch.E. from the University of Alabama in 1992, his M.S. in Chemical Engineering from Vanderbilt University in 1994, and his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Vanderbilt in 1998. He is the 2007 recipient of the Raymond W. Fahien Award for Outstanding Teaching Effectiveness and Educational
Department at Texas A&M University in Fall 2015. Dr. Obeidat teaches differenDr. Ulan Dakeev, Sam Houston State University Dr. Ulan Dakeev is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Technology Department at Sam Houston State University. His areas of research include Virtual & Augmented Reality, renewable energy (wind energy), quality in higher education, motivation, and engagement of employeesSyed Hasib Akhter Faruqui, Sam Houston State University Assistant Professor, Department of Engineering TechnologyJoe Nervis Jr, Sam Houston State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024BYOE: SeaKatz 2.0 – Vision and Pneumatic Claw for Underwater Robot with
. Furthermore, many manufacturers provide commercialteaching tools that were not available before. These straightforward tools make it easierto teach abstract concepts. These two primary factors permit us to try different ways touse time more efficiently and increase student engagement. In this case, we havestudents start with laboratories prior to complete coverage of all the theoreticalbackground and encourage them to find answers from later lectures by first exposingthem to problems associated with experimental results.The hypothesis behind this approach is two-fold: 1) Students, after gettingstraightforward, easy-to-understand, visible results from carefully designed laboratorysessions, will be motivated to learn more; 2) they will become more
technology, biomedic engineering and remote laboratories (WebLabs).Rog´erio Cassares PiresAlessandra Dutra CoelhoFernando de Almeida MartinsMarcello Nitz ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Web Platform for Learning Control Systems Based On IoT Application Abstract—This work presents the development of an IoTapplication aimed for teaching process control, which allows II. REMOTE LAB DEVELOPMENTremote access by web. It is a level control system with a friendly,responsive and interactive interface that allows theimplementation of SISO type control systems (Single Input and The concept applied to
teaching style which incorporateslaboratory experiments. We also describe the inductive approach to individual topics in heattransfer and mass transfer. We have found that this inductive approach to heat and mass transferhas naturally created opportunities for active learning via laboratory experiments and in-classdiscussions of experimental observations, thus contributing further to students’ understandingand retention of new material as shown in Figure 2. We Remember READING 10 % of what weread HEARING 20% of what we hear
Paper ID #42464BYOE: Determination of Diffusivity via Time-lapse Imaging with a 3D-PrintedSpectrometer and a Raspberry PILisa Weeks, University of Maine Lisa Weeks is a senior lecturer of Biomedical Enginering in the Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering at the University of Maine since 2017. She teaches several of the core fundamental courses including hands on laboratory courses.Dr. Raymond Kennard, University of Maine Dr Raymond Kennard, after graduating with a B.S. in Chemistry from Ithaca College in 1999, returned to his home state of Maine to teach chemistry at Fryeburg Academy. After four years of teaching
and industry. He was a Senior Lecturer at Anna- malai University, India, teaching civil engineering for about 10 years. He also worked in Linton Institute of Technology as a Senior Lecturer in Ipoh, Malaysia, for three years. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Cutting-edge Tools & Technologies: Teaching Engineering Online AbstractUniversity and College instructors use a rich collection of methods of teaching in conventionalclassrooms to impart knowledge to students. Traditional classroom teaching includes lectures,PowerPoint presentations, class discussions, laboratory demonstrations, team projects
Session 2208 Interactive Classroom for Experiential and Collaborative Learning Bruce L. Upchurch, Chi N. Thai University of Georgia, Biological & Agricultural Engineering Department Athens, GA 30602-4435Introduction. A major task to develop a new teaching laboratory for the Electrical andElectronic Systems (EES) was undertaken during Spring 2000. This laboratory is used by fourcourses in the Electrical and Electronic Systems area: Circuit Analysis, Electronics, Sensors andTransducers and Motors and Power Distribution. Each of these courses has a laboratorycomponent. The
Paper ID #43732Desktop Flow Visualisation Experiments for Guided Discovery of BoundaryLayersDr. Peter B. Johnson, Imperial College London Peter is a Principal Teaching Fellow (permanent academic staff with an education focused remit) in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Imperial College London. He teaches a fluid mechanics module to undergraduate students. He is also responsible for laboratory based learning, and plays a lead role in teaching administration within the department. Additionally, Peter has a remit to innovate in educational methods, with two main focuses: discovery based learning, including developing
mobile robotics. He is currently a lec- turer in the School of Engineering, Deakin University, where he teaches various electronics and robotics units.Ms. Robynne Hall, Deakin University Robynne Hall spent 13 years in the photographic industry designing cutting edge commercial print labo- ratories throughout Australia, maintaining and teaching silver halide and digital printing machines. As a mature age student, she returned to study and in 2002 completed an advanced diploma in electronics. She has since spent 12 months at the Gordon Institute of Technology in Geelong as a Laboratory Technician and tutor. During the past eight years, Hall has been at Deakin University as the Technical Officer for electronics
, andinspection) and scientific investigations (e.g., archaeological/geological survey), showing thepotential to assist with decision making and transform the way humans see and understand theworld.The geospatial industry is undergoing rapid transformation due to technological advancements,leading to significant changes in the types of skills and knowledge that are required byprofessionals working in this field. This, in turn, is challenging the skillsets that have beendeveloped through conventional S/G programs at colleges. For several decades, S/G programshave been focused on teaching students the fundamentals of surveying, cartography, andgeographic information systems (GIS), along with related technical skills such as usingsurveying equipment as well
presented or simply the desire torevise an existing laboratory course, many universities are attempting to modernizeundergraduate laboratory experiences. Coupled with diminishing budgets and increasedaccountability for expenditures, many universities are turning to on-line, virtual laboratories.Virtual laboratories are often cited as being cost effective and having high availability to thestudents. This method does not give students the hands-on experience, however. Our solution toaddress the issue of modernization bounded by economics is through using LEGO® bricks. Wepresent several examples in this paper of how the LEGO® RCX programmable brick can be usedto teach traditional engineering laboratory experiments.These popular interlocking bricks are
Paper ID #42102Designing a Low-Cost Series, Parallel, and Single Centrifugal Pumps Exercisefor an Upper-Level Undergraduate LaboratoryDr. Blake Everett Johnson, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Dr. Blake Everett Johnson is a Teaching Assistant Professor and instructional laboratory manager in the Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. His research interests include experimental fluid mechanics, measurement science, engineering education, engineering leadership, and professional identity development.Mr. Partha Kumar Das, University of Illinois at Urbana
physical education teacher. He has also co-authored multiple papers and conference presentations related to physical education teacher professional development.Dr. Marcia A. Pool, Purdue University Marcia Pool is an Instructional Laboratory Coordinator in the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering at Purdue University. She is responsible for overseeing and assessing junior level laboratories, bioin- strumentation, and biotransport, and is involved with teaching and mentoring students in the senior de- sign capstone course. Recently, she has worked with colleagues to plan and implement a problem-based learning approach to the biotransport laboratory to improve students’ experimental design skills and has modified
topics and direct learning rather than benefiting from more structured andcarefully designed learning experiences. He also researched the use of advance organizers inteaching and was a strong component of carefully structured learning [7, 8].The use of experimentation to teach, and also the design of a laboratory with hands-on experi-ences that relate to the corresponding class is related to these ideas in several ways. First, in-classexperiences can be considered as a type of advance organizer for the concepts taught in lab. Sec-ond, the hands-on lab experiences helps students tie the concepts to concrete physical phenomenarather than mere abstractions. Finally, the reinforcement of an empirical approach to scientificknowledge underscores the