entrepreneurship to hard core engineering. Some resourcesavailable to the faculty are heavy on the business side of the problem and somewhat lighter onthe technological and engineering side. To more effectively balance these topics, tweaking ofavailable resources must be done. In general, these types of courses involve a project thatproduces a 3D solid computer model of the product, or a physical prototype. An inevitableconsequence of this is that either existing products must be designed (actually copied) for theproject, or intellectual property must be considered. This paper discusses three areas ofrefinement to commonly available resources, two of which are technical in nature and one ofwhich is entrepreneurial. They are: (1) enhancement of engineering
more difficult to define. The concept of quality is a highly contested within HE3resulting in a variety of views as to what features a high quality placement might have. Fromthe educational viewpoint, the key quality indicator might be evidence that studentsundertaking placement perform better than their peers who did not, and most engineeringeducators would probably accept this as being the case. In the UK, the government fundedPROFILE project has sought evidence for better academic performance from students whohave undertaken an internship, and conclude4, ‘It has long been realized that students returning from work experience out perform students who haven’t been in the workplace in terms of performance in their final
UniversityAbstractThis paper describes activities and preliminary findings from a five-year, NSF-sponsored project(Award #1565066) at Purdue University Fort Wayne to increase the number of students whocomplete engineering, engineering technology, and computer science degrees. Purdue UniversityFort Wayne is a metropolitan, non-selective, public institution with a high percentage of under-prepared, first-generation, low-income, commuter students, many of whom work. The objectivesof this project are to (a) increase graduation rates of the STEM cohorts; (b) build the foundationfor a sustainable institutional structure and support STEM scholars and other students; (c) carryout research designed to advance understanding of the factors, practices, and curricular and
work in which engineers engage and the NASA Mars landing in 2021 was thetheme underlying each of the program’s hands-on projects. Problem-solving was a keyconnector of the subject of science to engineering. Students were given the opportunity to solveproblems just as engineers would while learning how engineers use science in their everydaywork. The NASA Mars landing in 2021, due to the excitement it generated across the generalpopulation, was used as a theme to increase students’ motivation to learn about and interest inengineering by engaging student teams in hands-on and fun real-life applications of theengineering underlying the Mars landing. This also provided a meaningful context for the middleschool students to learn about science
papers in peer-reviewed conference proceedings, and given 12 technical presentations. He was the 2011-12 recipient of the Armstrong State University Award for Distinguished Faculty Service to the Community. He was also the 2017-18 recipient of the Georgia Southern-Armstrong Campus Award for Distinguished Faculty Service to the University based on his work to improve campus diversity and contributions to faculty senate.Priya T Goeser (Professor)Josiah Thomas HackerThomas Dean Snyder Thomas Snyder graduated summa cum laude from Georgia Southern University in 2021 with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering. During his undergraduate studies he participated in numerous research projects as well as worked as a
the College Industry Council on Material Handling Education (CICMHE). She is an Associate Editor of the Engineering Ap- plications of Artificial Intelligence (Elsevier). She has been a principal investigator in several sponsored projects from National Science Foundation (NSF) and VentureWell.Dr. Abdullah Konak, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus Dr. Abdullah Konak is a Distinguished Professor of Information Sciences and Technology at the Penn- sylvania State University, Berks. Dr. Konak also teaches graduate courses in the Master of Science in Cybersecurity Analytics and Operations program at the College of Information Sciences and Technology, Penn State World Campus. Dr. Konak’s primary research interest
support. Evidence of effectiveness includes high graduationrates, career placement rates of students, and student perceptions of preparation for meeting ourprogram educational objectives. Perspectives from faculty new to the program and current andformer students illustrate the personal impact of the model.IntroductionThe Department of Integrated Engineering (IE) at Minnesota State University, Mankato housesupper-division project-based and co-op-based programs at two different off-campus locations.Student engineers in the programs are primarily transfer students from two-year colleges andspend at least two years in our programs to complete their BS in Engineering, thus creating a 2+2learning experience. The curriculum includes technical knowledge
Paper ID #37024Designing the Engineers Without Borders USA ProfessionalPreparation Study SurveysPaul A. Leidig Paul A. Leidig is a PhD candidate in Engineering Education and a member of the instructional team for the Engineering Projects In Community Service (EPICS) program at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. He received his Bachelors of Science in Architectural Engineering from the Milwaukee School of Engineering and Masters of Science in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Mr. Leidig is licensed as a Professional Engineer in the state of Colorado and has six
; Development and co-lead of UVA’s Resilient Urban Water Systems Working Group. He is the Director for Diversity and Inclusion in ESE.Prof. Andres Clarens, University of Virginia I am a Professor of Environmental Engineering at the University of Virginia and Associate Director of the University’s Environmental Resilience Institute. Our group studies decarbonization of infrastructure systems. At large scales, our work explores the life cycle environmental impacts of the manufacturing, transportation, and energy sectors through projects in next-generation bioenergy, subsurface energy stor- age, and negative emissions technologies. At the molecular scale, we study the chemistry of CO2 in high pressure environments to support
already eliminated some aspects of the literature fromconsideration. Specifically, due to staffing issues, the current librarian-staffed reference deskmodel is no longer feasible at Mines. The library is organized in a functional staffing model,making initiatives that require large numbers of liaison or reference-focused librarians difficult toimplement. Therefore, the authors are concentrating this literature review on larger models andissues rather than debates on desk location or staff organization.At the outset of the project, the authors were interested in exploring libraries using the term“concierge” to describe their services. This portion of the literature uses the term to describe avariety of programs from welcome desks to consolidated
across programs betweendifferent engineering disciplines.Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinary:As noted in Figure 1, multidisciplinarity is not a new phenomenon while interdisciplinarity is agrowing trend. However, there is a lack of consensus in the literature as to the definition of‘‘interdisciplinarity’’. Stokols et al. [5] provided distinct definitions describing the levels ofunion among different disciplines such as interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, cross disciplinary,and transdisciplinary science. In a multidisciplinary project, participants work independentlyusing their own discipline-specific knowledge to address a common problem. Relatedly, amultidisciplinary individual has knowledge in two or more academic
biogas using anaerobic digestion. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Food-to-Energy: A K12/University Partnership to Develop a Resource Recovery ProgramAbstractAn on-going, multi-faceted university/K-12 partnership, now in its third year, integrates aschool-wide food waste recovery program with classroom and extracurricular education inresource recovery. Pre- and post-consumer food waste from the high school and middle schoolcafeterias at a nearby K-12 school district is treated at an anaerobic digester system as part of anon-going University research project investigating the benefits of supplementing dairy farmdigester feed
developed. Thelearning is deductive only and provides no context for students on why they are learning thematerial or how it will apply to their future engineering careers [1]. Many pedagogical tools thataim to establish connections between the engineering curriculum and industry practices havebeen investigated and implemented with varying degrees of success, such as project basedlearning (PBL) [2,3] competency based learning (CBL) [4], and inductive teaching [1]. However,adjustments to the curriculum to support these alternate pedagogical tools may still overlook theformat of the corresponding assessment items. Assessment techniques that have not beendesigned specifically to complement the course remain in a generic format that is only relevantto
students’ understanding. Ethics, for example, is often taught in civilengineering through the use of case studies. Further, case studies offer an opportunity forinterdisciplinary discussions centered on human dignity and justice goals [8] and likewisedevelop empathy for the users impacted by the project. Empathy is increasingly beingrecognized for the central role it may play in connecting crucial inter- and intrapersonal skillswith enhanced abilities to understand and productively work in multidisciplinary environmentswith diverse stakeholder groups [9]. Finally, some professors may not feel comfortable directlydiscussing race and related topics within an otherwise technical classroom environment; casestudies allow the emphasis to be taken off of
process models, as reviewed by Wynn and Clarkson [7], where it isdescribed as; problem definition [8], clarifying the client’s requirements [9], statement of theproblem [10], clarifying the task and product planning [11], [12], preparation of problemassignment [13], functional requirements [14]. In software engineering design, the whole processis referred to as Requirements Engineering (RE), though RE is rooted in systems engineering andapplies more broadly than just software-intensive projects [15]. In Human-Centered Design andDesign Thinking, requirements development is intrinsically tied to the Understand (Empathize)and Synthesize (Define) phases where unmet needs are explored [16], [17] though requirementsare not necessarily discussed
Paper ID #241522018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29PEER: Professional-development Experiences for Education ResearchersDr. Scott Franklin, Rochester Institute of Technology Scott Franklin is a Professor in the School of Physics and Astronomy and Director of the CASTLE Center for Advancing STEM Teaching, Learning & Evaluation at Rochester Institute of Technology. His educa- tion research includes projects on the development of identity and affiliation in physics majors throughout their undergraduate career, and, separately, how physicists
, face-to-face educational methodologies. This study focusedon the use of synchronous, two-way IP video to propagate knowledge and hands-on skill.Pretests and posttests were used to examine youth’s knowledge and skill gains on materialcovering basic electrical concepts, theories, and skills.A comparative field study was conducted in the spring of 2004. Fifty-two Indiana 4-H membersenrolled in the Indiana 4-H Electric 1 project voluntarily participated in this study. Theparticipants came from a total of nine sites from across the state of Indiana. The sites wereselected from a randomly stratified sample to participate in the study. Each site received one ofthe two educational methodologies; traditional, face-to-face instruction or instruction
technical and social content.This need for energy education is the fundamental motivation for the energy awareness efforts atBaylor University. According to the National Energy Policy7, the U. S. must have between 1,300and 1,900 new electricity generation plants in place to meet the projected 45% increase inelectrical demand by the year 2020. Economic and political policies often reflect the unspokenassumption that the United States will be able to continually increase its reliance on naturalresources and more importantly, energy resources. On May 2, 2007, a local newspaper editor Page 13.491.2took time to remind the public of the energy history
Pittsburgh Undergraduate Review. Over the past three years he has participated in two sustainable engineering research projects involving sustainable drinking water systems and safe combustion on hydrogen gas. Following receiving his degree, he hopes to eventually go on to either Engineering and Public Policy Graduate School or Law School. Michaelangelo is a member of AIChE.Matthew Mehalik, University of Pittsburgh Matthew Mehalik serves as Program Manager at Sustainable Pittsburgh, a nonprofit that researches and promotes polices and practices of sustainability in the 10-county region of Western Pennsylvania. Dr. Mehalik also serves as Adjunct Assistant Professor in the School of
nomeasurable differences in testing performances among the three classes, but a positivecorrelation was demonstrated between better homework or quiz grades and testing grades.Copies of example of quizzes and an example project are provided. The results from studentsurveys indicate fairly strong support for the quizzes over homework and the use of a websiteover a more tradition format for the course. However, almost 25% of the students prefer a moretradition course format of weekly homework and writing on the board. IntroductionThe ultimate skill to be learned in an undergraduate engineering curriculum is “problemsolving.” Since essentially all engineering (and science) classes are limited to a narrowdiscipline
, hereinafter referred to as the instructor, joined this institute project with sometrepidation. As a graduate and former assistant mentor in the American Society of CivilEngineers (ASCE) Excellence in Civil Engineering Education (ExCEEd) program (Estes, et al.,2005; ASCE, 2008), the instructor is an outspoken institute proponent of the tenets of ExCEEd,including appropriate use of technology in the classroom. In fact, the instructor’s campusreputation in this regard was one significant reason the project PI contacted the instructor aboutjoining the project. The adoption of this technology-based instruction process for most all of theclass meetings seemed to the instructor to be a significant departure from his ExCEEd roots.Similarly, the project PI
focused on MATLAB. Caltech graduate students andinstitute staff lead each course. Course instructors are hired in the spring preceding the programand meet weekly to develop the course curriculum. Through lectures, hands-on experiments andhomework assignments, each course exposes participants to fundamental science principleswhile giving students the opportunity to propose further questions in the fields. As a culminatingproject for each course, participants produce a group research project with the help of a YESSinstructor. The successful completion of the project relies upon all the skills and concepts that thestudents acquire throughout the courses. At the end of the program, students present their projectfindings to Caltech faculty
INTRODUCTION TO CET/FYE 11016-281 PROJECT BASED CALC I 4 | 0606-099 CO-OP PREPARATION 01016-282 PROJECT BASED CALC II 4 | 0608-211 ENGR GRAPHICS W /CAD 41016-283 PROJECT BASED CALC III 4 | 0608-303 LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPUTER APP 21016-305 MULTIVARIABLE CALCULUS 4 | 0608-304 STRUCTURAL LOADS & SYSTEMS 21016-306 DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS I 4 | 0608-305 STRUCTURAL COMPUTER APPS 2 | 0608-320 SURVEYING I 4SCIENCE | 0608-330 MATERIALS OF
Computer Integrated Construction Research Program at Penn State. He teaches courses in construction engineering and management; Building Information Modeling; and virtual prototyping. He recently led a project to construct the Immersive Construction (ICon) Lab, an affordable, 3 screen immersive display system for design and construction visualization, and is developing an interactive virtual construction simulation application for engineering education. He can be reached at jim101@psu.edu.Thomas Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University Tom Litzinger is Director of the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education and a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Penn State, where he has
technology and the ability to retrieve information arethe same skill sets. In fact, they are not.”10 Students’ inflated sense of confidence can evencajole faculty (especially those who aren’t as comfortable with information technologies) intobelieving that they are already experts in this arena. Page 11.1309.4Changing Expectations Historically, the acquisition of information skills has been something that was on theperiphery of the curriculum – for example, a paper or other research project might be assigned inclass, but when it came to actually doing the associated research, students would often beexpected to figure it out on their own. As
students to develop the interpersonalcommunication and team building skills required for success in the engineeringwork place5. In the professional engineering world, communication skills arerequired in the three forms of written, oral, and graphic communication6.This article focuses on the restructuring of a class from the traditional “bankingeducation” approach, to include elements of a more progressive active learningapproach. Collaborative formal discussion groups and research projects providedactive learning experiences, which included written, oral, and graphiccommunication.2. History of Class format:CE4506 Environmental Regulation and Pollution Prevention design has beentaught for several years at Michigan Technological University. From
drawing is generated from the3D model. This paper presents the experiences and challenges of using MBD technology in anundergraduate manufacturing engineering curriculum for capturing design function andmanufacturing requirements through GD&T. It reviews a junior level Design for Manufacturecourse, where advanced concepts in GD&T are introduced, and where students are required todemonstrate their grasp of these concepts by utilizing MBD. To facilitate this methodology,students receive instruction in the use of CATIA’s Functional Tolerancing and Annotation (FTA)workbench which they are required to use in their assignments and project work. In addition toallowing the integration of annotation with the 3D model, the FTA workbench provides
Col- leges; ”Building Learning Communities to Improve Student Achievement: Albany City School District” , and ”Educational Leadership Program Enhancement Project at Syracuse University” Teacher Leadership Quality Program. She is also the PI on both ”Syracuse City School District Title II B Mathematics and Science Partnership: Science Project and Mathematics MSP Grant initiatives.Dr. Ali Reza Osareh, North Carlina A&T State University Ali Osareh received his PhD from Virginia tech in 1994. He has worked in the industry including wireless design before joining the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Carolina Agricul- tural and Technical State University in 2000. He is specializing in Energy
Communication Studies at James Madison University and has published research using qualitative interviewing, ethnographic and rhetorical methods to examine communication in diverse contexts ranging from aging families to university campus cultures. She has advised undergraduate and graduate students in ethnographic and qualitative interview projects on a wide-range of topics, has taught research methods at the introductory, advanced, and graduate levels, and has trained research assistants in diverse forms of data collection and analysis. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Negotiating Tensions of Independence and Connection in Makerspace Cultures: A Qualitative
vacant each year. Attrition inengineering industry is a persistent problem, threatening national goals related to technologicaladvancement and global competitiveness. As a result, educational institutions are asked toconsider practices that ensure both academic success in college, as well as post-graduationoutcomes in the workforce. Using survey data from a National Science Foundation funded study,titled Project to Production: Conditions and Processes for Educating the Engineer of 2020 (P2P),this study investigated the relationships between several high impact curricular and co-curriculareducational practices, such as undergraduate research and co-curricular design projects, and post-graduation retention in engineering. Results suggest that