. Movers, Dreamers, and Risk-Takers: Unlocking the Power of ADHD. (Hazelden, 2012).9 Rogers, M. & Meek, F. Relationships Matter: Motivating Students with ADHD through the Teacher- Student Relationship. Perspectives on Language and Literacy 41, 21 (2015).10 Cramond, B. Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Creativity — What is the connection? The Journal of Creative Behavior 28, 193--210, doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1994.tb01191.x (1994).11 Shaw, J. A. Hyperactiviy and Creativity: The Tacit Dimension. Bulitin of the Psychomonic Society 30, 157- 160 (1992).12 Eisenman, R. Creativty, birth order, and risk taking. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25, 87-88, doi:10.3758/BF03330292 (1987).13 Fugate, M. C
able to use it in some kind of application or other context later on.” [person B] “…you have kind of the ambition or drive to um, be kind of in a continuous state of improvement, um, I don’t think that it necessarily means you’re learning useless things everyday that you’re never going to use, but kind of like, I look at it as continuously bettering yourself in your trade or the parts of your life where it kind of benefits you.” [person X]Managing the Act of LearningIn this category, the learning rather than happening from some sort of top-down modelwith the learner at the top, is experienced with the learner in the middle managing all ofthe various actions and interactions. The learners view themselves as
) Design and Development of Self-Directed Learning Modules for Foundations of Computer Programming Course. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA.Appendix A - Learning From Failure - Discussion QuestionsAppendix B - Manufacturing & Robotics Project – Project Overview
Paper ID #15103Capstone Design Projects: An Emphasis on Communication, Critical Think-ing, and AnalysisDr. Taryn Melkus Bayles, University of Pittsburgh Taryn Bayles, Ph.D., is a NTS Professor of Chemical Engineering in the Chemical and Petroleum Engi- neering Department at the University of Pittsburgh, where she incorporates her industrial experience by bringing practical examples and interactive learning to help students understand fundamental engineering principles. Her current research focuses on engineering education, outreach and curriculum development. c American Society for Engineering
ASEE International Forum. Seattle Washington: ASEE PEER; 2015.7. Matthews M. Keeping students in engineering: a research-to-practice brief. American Society of Engineering Education, ASEE, Editorial: www asee org. 2012.8. Felder RM, Brent R. Understanding student differences. Journal of engineering education. 2005;94(1):57-72.9. Chubin DE, May GS, Babco EL. Diversifying the engineering workforce. Journal of Engineering Education. 2005;94(1):73-86.10. Brainard SG, Carlin L. A Six‐Year Longitudinal Study of Undergraduate Women in Engineering and Science. Journal of Engineering Education. 1998;87(4):369-375.11. Yang M, Webster B, Prosser M. Travelling a thousand miles: Hong Kong Chinese students’ study
a pilot attempt and opportunities exist for increasing participation andrefining overall program activities based on the survey results. 6Reference[1] B. L. Yoder, “Engineering By the Numbers,” 2012, [Available Online] http://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/11-47.pdf[2] Electrical and Electronics Engineers. [Available Online] http://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/electrical-and-electronics-engineers.htm[3] Computer Hardware Engineers. [Available Online] http://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/computer-hardware-engineers.htm 7Appendix A: Students survey form for ECE-GIRLS
all levels of education and in higher education, including vocational training and vocational training for the vulnerable, including information and communications technology, persons with disabilities, indigenous peoples and technical, engineering and scientific programmes, in children in vulnerable situations developed countries and other developing countries 4.6y 2030, ensure that all youth and a substantial B 4.c By 2030, substantially increase the supply of proportion of adults, both men and women, achieve qualified teachers, including through international
Paper ID #15349Increasing Multi-Cultural Awareness in Engineering StudentsMs. Ning Xuan Yip, Purdue University, West Lafayette Ning Xuan Yip is a third year student pursuing Chemical Engineering at Purdue University. She is part of the Leadership Team in the Women In Engineering Mentor and Mentee Pair Program, where she organizes meetings and networking events with a focus on developing relationships between the mentors and mentees. As the Diversity Liaison for the program, she works to increase the multi-cultural awareness of the participants, and to increase the retention of international students within the program
. The questions our research project seeks to answer are: 1.a. Do students learn writing skills more effectively in integrated sections than in non-integrated sections? b. Do students learn communication skills more effectively in integrated sections than in non-integrated sections? c. Do students learn design thinking more effectively in integrated sections than in non-integrated sections? 2.Will the integrated courses increase students’ perceived learning and sense of self-efficacy? 3.Will the integrated courses help students engage with and value the broader academic community and mission of the University? 4.How and in
, B., Grossman, J. (2010). Diversity and youth mentoring relationships. In Allen, T., Eby, L., (2) The Blackwell handbook of mentoring: A multiple perspectives approach (pp. 239-255). Hong Kong: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 4. Chen, X., Soldner, M. (2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields. National Center for Education Statistics. 1-104. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014001rev.pdf 5. Bergmann, J. (2013). The biggest hurdle to flipping the classroom. Retrieved from http:// http://www.edutopia.org/blog/biggest-hurdle-flipping-your-class-jon-bergmann 6. Bean, J. C. (2011). Engaging ideas: The professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking
participation ofunderrepresented students in STEM. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol 105(1), Feb 2013, 89-107.[5] Hathaway, Russel S.; Sharp, Sally; Davis, Cinda-Sue; Programmatic Efforts Affect Retention ofWomen in Science and Engineering, Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, Vol.7, Issue 2, 2001[6] Bybee R., Morrow, C., Improving Science Education: The role of Scientists. Newsletter Forum onEducation American Physics Society. Fall 1998.[7] Dolan E., Education Outreach and Public Engagement, Vol. 1 of Mentoring in Academia andIndustry, Springer, 2008[8] Dolan E, Soots B., Strategies for Avoiding Reinventing the Precollege Education and OutreachWheel. Genet 166:1601-1609, 2004[9] Andrews, E., Weaver, A., Hanley, D., Shamatha
working with other Universities from Tanzania, Malta and the UK. Until recently Jane was Director for Undergraduate Teaching and Learning where she led an initiative to design a new engineering curriculum. Her work has been acknowledged internationally with Fellowships from the UK’s Institute of Engineering and Technology and the Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand. Jane continues to be recognised for her work in engineering education and is currently engaged with advising NZ’s Tertiary Education Commission on introducing degree apprenticeships.Dr. Lizzie Miles, Coventry University UKDr. Anh Lan Ho Tran, Coventry University Dr Anh Tran is a Senior Lecturer of Humanitarian Engineering at Coventry
clean room, laboratory and engineering spaces. CNSE conducts electronic miniaturization research and fabrication in the Class 10,000 and 100 cleanrooms. With the author’s graduate students, the WIECE students visited the Center for Nanoscale Science and Engineering (CNSE) and worked there on Integrated Circuits (IC) chip packaging and testing. Figures 1 and 2 show the packaged chips at CNSE. (a) (b) (c)Figure 1: WIECE students worked at CNSE on IC Chip Packaging and Testing. Figure 2: The Packaged Chip.3. EvaluationStudent surveys were conducted at the end of the program
strategies for retaining engineering, engineering andtechnology and computer science students. Retrieved from ASEE websitehttps://www.asee.org/search?q=going+the+distanceDuckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passionfor long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087-1101.Duckworth, A.L., & Seligman, M. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ predicting academic performance inadolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939-944.Hughes, B., Garibay, J. C., Hurtado, S., & Eagan, M. K. (2013). Examining the tracks that causederailment: institutional contexts and engineering degree attainments. AERALent, R W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying
.Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2013). Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational psychologist, 48(3), 169-183.Lawanto, O., Santoso, H. B., Lawanto, K. N., & Goodridge, W. (2014). Self-Regulated Learning Skills and Online Activities between Higher and Lower Performers on a Web-Intensive Undergraduate Engineering Course. Journal of Educators Online, 11(3).Lin, P.-C., Hou, H.-T., Wang, S.-M., & Chang, K.-E. (2013). Analyzing knowledge dimensions and cognitive process of a project-based online discussion instructional activity using Facebook in an adult and continuing education course. Computers & Education, 60, 110- 121. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu
National Assessment of Higher Order Thinking. Retrieved from http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/a-model-for-the-national-assessment-of-higher-order- thinking/591 12. Peach, B. E., Mukherjee, A., & Hornyak, M. (2007). Assessing critical thinking: A college's journey and lessons learned. Journal of Education for Business, 82(6), 313-320. 13. Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education-Washington-, 95(2). 14. Ralston, P., & Bays, C. (2010). Refining a critical thinking rubric for engineering. 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. https
. Hariharan, B. (2011). Innovating Capability for (Deweyan) Continuity of Inquiry in the Face of (Zimbardoean)Discontinuity Within the Context of Engineering Education Research: Fostering Collaborations with UnderservedCommunities in the Developing Regions of the World. Department of Mechanical Engineering Stanford University.5. Riley, D. (2008). Chapter 4. Toward a More Socially Just Engineering. In Engineering and social justice (p. 111).San Rafael, Calif.: Morgan & Claypool.6. Cumming-Potvin, W., Currie, J., (2013), Towards New Literacies and Social Justice for Engineering Education,International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace, 2(1), 21-37.7. Streiner, S., Cunningham, S., Huang, S., Levonisova, S., Matherly, C., Besterfield
and Self-Regulated Learning in Young Children: Role of Collaborative and Peer-Assisted Learning. Journal of Cognitive and Educational Psychology, 2007. 6(3): p. 433-455. 9 9. Schraw, G. and D. Moshman, Metacognitive Theories. Educational Psychology Review, 1995. 7(4): p. 351-371.10. Ambrose, S.A., et al., How Learning Works: 7 Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. 2010, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.11. Svinicki, M., Learning and Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom. 2004, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.12. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: a methods
Hybrid cloud environment for manufacturing control system Julia Yadgarovaa, Anastasia Stelvagab and Victor Taratukhinc a Bauman Moscow State Technical University, b Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, c Stanford University AbstractToday the concepts of Smart factory, Internet of Things and Industrial Internet play asignificant role in innovation process and new engineering design architectures. Using designthinking approach, university team of MSc and PhD students under the guidance of global ITcompany
Paper ID #14631On Becoming an Engineer: The Essential Role of Lifelong Learning Compe-tenciesJillian Seniuk Cicek, University of Manitoba Jillian Seniuk Cicek is a PhD Candidate in Engineering Education in the Department of Biosystems Engi- neering at the University of Manitoba, in Winnipeg, Canada. She is a research assistant for the Centre for Engineering Professional Practice and Engineering Education in the Faculty of Engineering. Her research areas include outcomes-based teaching and assessment methods and tools, student-cantered instruction (SCI), the Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB) graduate
an umbrella concept, Additive Innovation is a mode of collaboration where participantsin a community are: a) inspired by shared artifacts/ideas, b) openly share (and learn about) technology and processes used to create these, artifacts/ideas, c) design and prototype own modified version of the shared artifact/idea, and d) share their modified artifact/idea back with the community.The community design process in Figure 1 illustrate the mindset of additive innovation. 1. Inspiring Community 2. Sharing 4. Sharing & Learning
course(taught by an engineering subject matter expert). We will also discuss how practicing engineers canuse this book and accompanying online workflow materials as they develop their own workplaceprojects.Bibliography[1] D. Kmiec, B. Longo and J. M. Williams, "Extended abstract: Using project workflow to teach engineeringcommunication," Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 2015 IEEE International, Limerick, 2015, pp. 1-2.[2] D. Winsor. Writing Like An Engineer: A Rhetorical Education. New York: Routledge, 1996.[3] R. Spilka. “Orality and Literacy in the Workplace: Process- and Text-Based Strategies for Multiple-AudienceAdaptation,” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 4 (1990), pp. 44-67.[4] C. Spinuzzi. Tracing Genres
(163), 77-87. doi:10.1002/he.200674. Merolla, D. d., & Serpe, R. T. (2013). STEM enrich ment programs and graduate sch ool matriculation: the role o fscience identity salience. Social Psychology Of Education, 16(4), 575 -597. doi:10.1007/s11218-013-9233-75. Myers, C. B., & Pavel, D. M. (2011). Underrepresented students in STEM : The transition fro m undergraduate tograduate programs. Journal Of Diversity In Higher Education, 4(2), 90 -105. doi:10.1037/a00216796. National Science Board. (2015). Revisiting the STEM workforce. A co mpanion to science and engineeringindicators 2014 (1-46). Arlington VA: National Science Foundation.http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2015/nsb201510/nsb201510.pdf7. National Science Board. 2014. Science and Engineering
cover each outcome. Data tabulations cover four yearsfrom 2012 to 2015, and include a total student sample size of n = 2,628, extending across a totalof 48 individual Embedded Indicators.Table 2. Summary of CEE Department Professional Skills Oriented Outcomes Dept. Outcome Outcome Criteria Contemporary Issues Describe influence of contemporary issues on engineering solutions. Project Management Explain what a project is and key elements of project management. Communication Organize and deliver effective graphical, verbal and written a.) Graphical communication. b.) Verbal c.) Written
Journal of ePortfolio 1(1), 95- 106. Retrieved from http://www.theijep.com/Wuetherick, B., & Dickinson, J. (2015). Why eportfolios? Student perceptions of eportfolio use in continuing education learning environments. International Journal of ePortfolio, 5(1), 39-53. Retrieved from http://www.theijep.com/Yastibas, A. E., & Cepik, S. (2015). Teachers’ attitudes toward the use of e-portfolios in speaking classes in English language teaching and learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 514- 525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.505Yastibas, A. E., & Yastibas, G. C. (2015). The use of e-portfolio-based assessment to develop students’ self-regulated learning in English language
3 $2,000,000 4 $2,200,000 5 $3,000,000(a) Computer the IRR for this investment using trial and error method.(b) Would you accept this investment at MARR = 20% (Show your work for why)?ConclusionsThe educational case study presented in this paper is designed to highly replicate a real-worldinland waterway disruption scenario. A solutions manual is available to engineering educators bysubmitting an email request to the authors. The significance of this developed case study istwofold. First, it provides the students with a real-world engineering problem to apply andpractice their engineering economy and decision analysis skills
, e.g. Assessment and Feedback1. Understand point Read Li et al. “Defect 5-min quiz and solutions, Conceptual questions indefects, including energies of graphite Q+A session assignmentadatom, vacancy, Stone- Density-functionalWales defect in carbon- calculations”, Phys. Rev.based materials. B 72, 184109 (2005)2. Prepare your own Payne et al. “Iterative Create a computational Computational modelingcomputational modeling minimization techniques modeling input file to questions in assignment,input file. for ab initio total-energy determine
applied Intelligent Fast Failure principles. Ingeneral, we believe students may apply IFF principles differently due to the presence (or lack) ofdifferent physical resources, different levels of satisfaction, different personal goals, differentstyles of creativity, and/or different prototyping skills. Although some students made only oneattempt before settling on a final Shoe Tower solution, most tried multiple times beforeproducing their final prototype; the exercise did not set a target number of attempts.A brief summary of statistics for the number of Attempts (i.e., Failure Times) is provided inTable 3 (and illustrated in Figures 4a/b) in two forms: using original data, and using normalizeddata based on Templeton’s 2-step approach15. When
+/-grades, so the conversion is A+ = 4.0, A = 4.0, A- = 3.7, B+ = 3.3, etc. We count W’s and CW’sas 0.0, along with F’s. This is consistent with DWF used more generally as a student successmetric, in that it considers an F and a W to be equally unsuccessful.Calc II Grade = (Total grade points) / (Cohort size – Audits – Incompletes)It is possible that there one cohortcould be better prepared for college level work than anothercohort. So we tracked four control variables for each cohort: GenACT: About 70% of our students have either an ACT or an SAT Math score. SAT Math scores are converted to ACT using published concordances.7 If this results in two scores (some students have both ACT and SAT) we take the higher. This is averaged
funds of knowledge has beenused in STEM education literature by examining the following questions: 1) How is the funds of knowledge framework being utilized to understand math, science and engineering concepts at the secondary and post-secondary level? 2) What are implications for the use of the construct—funds of knowledge—in research related to a) first generation college students, in general, and b) first-generation college students in engineering?Study Methods and FindingsA systematic literature review is a methodology for “making sense of large bodies of information”and a way of contributing answers to questions “about what works and what does not” amongother types of questions (p. 2).17 Additionally, it is