Expertise Abbott Laboratories Biomaterials AstraZeneca Biomechanics Baxter Healthcare Bioinformatics Boston Scientific Bioinstrumentation Cardiodynamics BioMEMS Cleveland Medical Devices Biotransport Page 13.981.4 Datasciences, International Cellular Biomechanics Dentigenix, Inc. Computational Modeling Table 2 continued Companies
them establish a benchmark for their current pedagogical approaches and strive tomove into a higher quadrant.Specific Program ComponentsThere are numerous programs and program components within our Partnership. A few examplesare described here to illustrate the breadth of both the approaches used and the STEM disciplinesaddressed.Teacher Training through STEM InstitutesThe optimal partnership involves teachers partnering with working scientists, mathematicians,and engineers, who have sophisticated equipment in laboratory work space, computing facilitiesand other resources of higher education. Well-designed 30-hour Summer Institutes provide a“hands-on”, project-based environment to improve teachers’ content knowledge throughapplication
mandatory for students identified bythe above criteria.II. IN THE CLASSROOMThe class met for six hours a day for five consecutive days during the last week of August. All11 students attended each session and arrived on time and were actively engaged throughout theentire class time. Prof. Glenn Ellis from the Picker Engineering Program was the lead instructorin the course. Dr. Catherine McCune, Director of the Quantitative Learner Center (QLC), alsoled a two-hour session and was present for much of the class time. Two Smith engineeringstudents—Shannon Comiskey (a junior) and Briana Tomboulian (a senior)—provided additionalassistance in the classroom. Hands-on activities and laboratories, group-learning experiencesand class discussion were the
the student activities, parent workshops, and joint parent-student activities executed in the 2007 summer are presented next.Orientation SessionAll parents and students were required to attend an orientation program held on the first day. Theorientation covered a history of the Family Science Academy, program overview, expectations,and teacher introductions. After the orientation we went into the first parent workshop session,and the students went to the lab to do their first activity planned for the day..Student ActivitiesThe students were divided into two age specific groups of 4th to 5th grades and 6th to 7th grades.Each group was taught by a separate instructor in laboratories provided by the ChemistryDepartment. Both groups worked on the
:• Faculty and student exchange• New and/or higher level academic programs• Dual/joint degree and certificate programs• Distance, continuing and e-education• Laboratory development and sharing of resources• Curriculum development, course equivalency and accreditation support• Faculty development, including higher degrees• Industry internship, cooperative programs and career development• Joint training and research programs, and solicitation of funds• Development, commercialization and transfer of technology• Dissemination of scholarly achievements and other accomplishments by member institutions. Page 14.296.3LACCEI has developed some initiatives and
abstractrepresentation of reality. Thus, the goal of learning, behaviourism submits, is to understand thereality and modify behaviour accordingly, and the purpose of teaching is to transfer theknowledge from expert to learner18. The behaviourist model is still widely adopted forinstructional design of teaching factual or procedural knowledge of engineering. Instructorsconvert the reality into abstract or generalized representations, and transfer them to studentsthrough a well-planned, linear and gradual procedure in a “tamed” environment, be it aclassroom or laboratory. The students’ performance is assessed by measuring the proximity oftheir behaviour (answering questions, writing reports and essays, performing laboratoryexperiments, etc.) to the expected
Engineering (1982), and a Master degree in Electrical Engineering (1986) from North Carolina A&T State University. Prior to her current position at UNC-Charlotte, Nan worked for IBM (15 years) and Solectron (8 years) in the area of test development and management. She teaches the senior design course and manages the standalone computers in the Electrical Engineering department.William Heybruck, University of North Carolina, Charlotte William Heybruck received his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte in 2001. Prior to becoming the Director of the UNC Charlotte College of Engineering Industrial Solutions Laboratory he was a Senior Engineer for
3 4 Total 7 13 203. Summer Experience ActivitiesAs mentioned in the Introduction, the AMALTHEA REU Program lasts 10 weeks and typicallyspans the period of mid-May through end of July every year. During the first day all REUstudents at each site participate in an orientation regarding the Program. Participants areintroduced to the rest of the AMALTHEA staff, are familiarized with the university surroundings(eateries, laboratories, library, emergency contacts, etc.), complete a variety of participationforms, are given access to a variety of resources (such as email accounts, access to labs, etc
that evaluates programs against these 12 an advanced level standards, and provides feedback to students, faculty, 6. CDIO Workspaces and other stakeholders for the purposes of continuous Workspaces and laboratories that support and improvement encourage hands-on learning of product and system building, disciplinary knowledge, and social learning Table 1. Twelve CDIO StandardsWith these Standards, the CDIO consortium envisions a curriculum that is ≠ organized around mutually supporting disciplines, with CDIO activities highly interwoven, ≠ rich with student design-build projects
. Page 1.169.2 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings Two aspects of this project are key features in the attempt to develop “early design” experiences forstudents. First, the vertically integrated design teams introduce sophomores and juniors to realistic civilengineering design problems which, in most curricula, are not addressed until the senior year. The expectationhere is that the underclassmen (especially the sophomores and to a somewhat lesser extent the juniors) will bemotivated by their interaction with the seniors as they experience the application of engineering theory indesign. Thus, these students should perform better in their other lecture and laboratory courses. Second, theproblems
experiences 3. Modern engineering tools 3k 4.13 ± 0.74 2. Design & conduct experiments;Laboratory learning experiences * 3. Modern engineering tools 3b; 3k 4.00 ± 0.85 10. Societal impactArts and humanities 11. Contemporary Global Issues 3h 3.87 ± 1.19 17. Business & public administration NR(specialization option) 4. In-depth competence NR* some of these questions were combined on the 2007 alumni surveys, so their data was notincluded since it reflected the combined
: cynthia.e.foor-1@ou.edu.randa shehab, University of Oklahoma Randa Shehab is an associate faculty member and Director of the School of Industrial Engineering at the University of Oklahoma. Before joining OU in 1997, she worked as an Ergonomics Consultant to the Manufacturing Ergonomics Laboratory at the General Motors Technical Center in Warren, Michigan. The focus of her research is in the area of human factors and ergonomics, with emphasis on human performance of special populations, technology and learning, and engineering education. Her most current research is focused on identifying factors related to success of underrepresented minority engineering students. Address: School of
overhaul.During the summer of 2004, the authors rewrote the course, creating a new course that focuseson technology’s impact on society. By removing circuits and machines, the course now covers abroader range of electrical engineering fields such as image and signal processing, datacompression, electronic navigation, communications, and computer networks and security. Thecourse examines current trends; with a focus on how the Coast Guard and Homeland Securityuse technology and discusses the ethical issues that arise with the potential misuse of technology.The authors developed several innovative lesson plans, laboratories and even a series of debatesto improve the students’ understanding of technological trade-offs, while developing their
engineering/technology applications of the scienceconcepts presented in the textbook [27]. Most textbooks do not have any laboratory activitiesthat allow students to apply engineering principles and design to scientific concepts. Studentsmay use some of the engineering processes, e.g., identify problems or design opportunities, butthey are usually limited to science activities/experiments that do not have real worldtechnological applications. Only occasionally is an engineering activity found in the physics partof a physical science textbook, e.g., design and testing of a model bridge. Teachers can designtheir own activities to give more engineering applications of the science concepts but withoutformal courses in their pre-service programs or in
room for a full course on fuel cells.IntroductionIt is surprising to learn that fuel cell technology is over 165 years old, and yet it has made onlymarginal inroads in the modern power production world. William Grove, a British investigator,is generally acknowledged as the inventor of the fuel cell. However, some sources indicate that itmight have been Humphrey Davy who should be credited with this invention in 1801, almostforty years earlier3. The successful development of combustion-mechanical power-dynamotechnology in the early 1900 overshadowed any attempts to commercially develop fuel cells’direct conversion for many years to come. Most fuel cell work was done in a laboratory setting
-nology.com 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.teach- nology.com/tutorials/teaching/rubrics3. S. M. Blanchard, M. G. McCord, P. L. Mente, D. S. Lalush, C. F. Abrams, E. G. Loboa, H. T. Nagle, Rubrics Cubed: Tying Grades to Assessment to Reduce Faculty Workloads, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.4. V. L. Young, D. Ridgeway, M. E. Prudich, D. J. Goetz, B. J. Stuart, Criterion-Based Grading for Learning and Assessment in Unit Observations Laboratory, Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.5. What is a Rubric? Relearning by Design, Inc., 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.relearning.org
Materials Science & Engineering from Boise State in 2014. In the Spring of 2016, Ann was recognized as part of the first cohort of University Innovation Fellows at Boise State, and has worked as a Fellow to collect and incorporate student feedback into future plans for makerspaces on the Boise State campus. As an undergraduate and graduate student, she has been involved with the Society of Women Engineers, and also taught a materials science laboratory course as a graduate teaching assis- tant. She has volunteered at numerous STEM outreach activities on and off of the Boise State campus throughout her time as a student and is passionate about increasing diversity in STEM and helping girls and women to
, expert psychological biases on ocean liner industry including overconfidence, history in NYC and Europe conflict of interest Use of substandard materials Videos of laboratory tests (at due to external pressures on ocean temperature) on shipyard culture materials similar to those used versus once which should have been usedHindenburg Hydrogen-fueled
. In [16], we surveyed the current practices inSE education published by the European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI), and clas-sified them into 8 categories: • Master programs with academia-industry partnerships [17] [18]. • Few-months international academia-industry projects [19]. • Student challenges [20]. • Few-weeks projects within regular engineering curriculum [21]. • Theoretical courses within industrial engineering curriculum [22]. • Few-Days Laboratories [23] [24]. • LEGO-Based Programs [25] [26] [27] [14] [28] Other less prominent SE education approaches exist, some of which can be found in [29],such as Quizzes, Lab Reports, Design Projects, Arduino Projects, Exams, Homework, Labs,Lecture and class
and ACS Publications Division of the American Chemical Society.Faber, C., Vargas, P., & Benson, L. (n.d.). Measuring Engineering Epistemic Beliefs in Undergraduate Engineering Students.Ferguson, L. E., & Braten, I. (2013). Student profiles of knowledge and epistemic beliefs: Changes and relations to multiple-text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 25, 49–61. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.003Galloway, K. R., & Bretz, S. L. (2015a). Measuring meaningful learning in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory: a national, cross-sectional study. Journal of Chemical Education. Easton: American Chemical Society Division of Chemical Education.Galloway, K. R., & Bretz, S. L. (2015b). Using
Course Learning Objectives in a Large Undergraduate Environmental Engineering ClassActive Learning Luster-Teasley et 2016 Making the Case: Adding Case Studies to an al. Environmental Engineering Laboratory to Increase Student Engagement, Learning, and Data AnalysisFlipped class Bielefeldt 2013 Teaching a Hazardous Waste Management Course using an Inverted Classroom2. Course Description and
another endorsement of the ‘you’ve done goodthings.’” He hopes there is more freedom to work and less administrative duties involved in hisnew job after he earns his Ph.D. in comparison to the military lab.KristenSituating the CaseTaking the advice of an engineering faculty member, Kristen joined a non-profit organizationafter graduation for the summer to investigate cookstoves for developing countries. She met herhusband there, and they decided to spend the next few years fulfilling their humanitarian sense ofduty. Kristen was a pre-school teacher, worked with special needs children and adults, and re-joined the non-profit organization as a laboratory manager. She created test protocols, wrotereports, and traveled to developing countries. After
Engineering for Honors program, he is heavily involved with teaching and developing laboratory content, leading the in-house robotics controller maintenance, and managing the robotics project development.Mr. Michael Schulz, The Ohio State University Michael H. Schulz is a teaching assistant with the Fundamentals of Engineering Honors program at The Ohio State University. He is currently the lead developer of the robot course software development team, of which he has been a member for three years. As a Computer Science and Engineering (CSE) student, he will graduate in May, 2017 with his B.S.C.S.E and a minor in Music, Media, and Enterprise.Ms. Clare Rigney, Ohio State University, Engineering Education Department Clare has
theUnited States to compete in the space race. This shift was achieved “at the expense of design andapplication-based laboratory courses,” according to Holloway (1991:94). As a debate over theengineering curriculum grew, S.C. Hollister, president of ASEE, commissioned a review ofengineering education, which would become known as the Grinter Report.A primary recommendation of the Grinter Report was for engineering programs to increase themathematics, physics, and engineering sciences content of the curriculum (Grinter, 1955). Adraft of the report also recommended that engineering be bifurcated (Seely, 1995). One formwould focus more on the scientific and theoretical aspects of engineering and educate engineersworking in research and design for the
Introduction to Digital Logic Design Laboratory Course,” Proceddings of 2015 American Society for Engineering Education, (Zone III). https://www.asee.org/documents/zones/zone3/2015/Active-Learning-in-the-Introduction-to-Digital-Logic- Design-Laboratory-Course.pdf[7] Aws Yousif Fida El-Din and Hasan Krad, “Teaching Computer Architecture and Organization using Simulation and FPGAs,” International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Vol. 1, No. 3, August 2011.[8] Guoping Wang, “Lessons and Experiences of Teaching VHDL,” Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition[9] Chao Wang and Michael Goryll, "Design and Implementation of an Online Digital
learning is thetopic of this study. A number of journal articles are available that address teaching core engineering courses,and this situation is true for the teaching of Process Control and Automatic Control. Mostpublished papers (e.g., Edgar et. al., 2006; Khier, et. al., 1996; and Seborg et.al, 2003) addressthe course content and issues like whether frequency response should be included in the course,the proper role of dynamic simulation, and design of physical laboratories. Recently, a fewstudies have addressed teaching and learning methods that could be applied to any appropriatecontrol course content. Rossiter (2014) describes blended learning using YouTube videosdeveloped for students to prepare before class. The class was large
Accounting from the Universidad Aut´onoma de Baja California (UABC) in Mexico. She has over 5 years of experience as a Financial Auditor for the Mexican Congress. She has had the opportunity to participate as part of the PROMISE community to enhance the preparation of graduate and postdoctoral fellows in STEM. Her research interests focus on bridging the disparity of availability of information that improves programs that enforce participation in STEM careers.Miss Amanda Lo, University of Maryland, Baltimore County I am a current Master’s student in the Biological Sciences Department of the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. I work in Dr. Jeff Leips’ research laboratory where I spend my time researching about
Alabama. Dr. Burian’s professional career spans more than 20 years during which he has worked as a de- sign engineer, as a Visiting Professor at Los Alamos National Laboratory, as a Professor at the University of Arkansas and the University of Utah, and as the Chief Water Consultant of an international engineer- ing and sustainability consulting firm he co-founded. He served as the first co-Director of Sustainability Curriculum Development at the University of Utah where he created pan-campus degree programs and stimulated infusion of sustainability principles and practices in teaching and learning activities across campus. Dr. Burian currently is the Project Director of the USAID-funded U.S.-Pakistan Center for