Conference Session

Computer-related Issues

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Barry Dupen, Purdue University, Fort Wayne

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

improvement are required. Five years of data appear on this graph (two years for School C), plus two years of projections. Text accompanying this graph would have to explain the reasoning behind these projections, expecially the large increase projected for School B. 4. Arrows indicate which direction is “good”. In the example graph, “good” is upwards; in a graph showing a negative trait such as absenteeism or drop-out rates, “good” would be downwards. 5. Appropriate comparisons are shown clearly. In this graph, three schools in a school district are compared with each other, with the district as a whole, with a comparable school district, and with national trends.This last point emphasizes the importance of

Conference Session

Biomedical Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael R. Caplan, Arizona State University; Joshua Adams, Arizona State University ; Michelene T.H. Chi, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

problem couldpartly be solved by allowing students to choose their own teammate, but this may have adverseeffects on the learning of students who do not enter the class knowing a study partner. In ongoing work, we plan to study (a) the quality of interactivity of students conductinghomework this way, (b) the possible benefits to students who enter the course with lower priorknowledge, and (c) conduct repeated measures using the same homework assignments but with anew cohort of students. As a part of this study, we have asked students to record themselves doing the homeworktogether so that we can assess the quality of their interactions. Although we tried to avoid bias bymaking it clear to students that their self-recorded video would have

Conference Session

Elementary Engineering

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicole J. Glen, Bridgewater State University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

the spotlight since the advent of the Next Generation ScienceStandards, which includes a focus on engineering practices and engineering-specific standards.Locally, our state added pre-kindergarten to our NGSS-aligned standards. The new expectationsfor learning engineering has put pressure on teachers to include engineering as part of theircurricula. Teaching engineering involves a different way of approaching curricula than whatmany teachers are used to, with its focus on open-ended, multi-answer problems. Few to nopreschool teachers have a background in engineering, yet many believe engineering is importantto teach young children. The four preschool teachers in this study had a beginning knowledge ofand positive attitudes toward teaching

Conference Session

NGSS & Engineering Education

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy Trauth, University of Delaware; Jenni Buckley, University of Delaware; Debra J. Coffey, University of Delaware

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

fundamental nature, content, and build a working prototype. They were required to test their design, identify weaknesses, and content and practices of engineering and determine how to address those weaknesses. The institute did not address explicitly practices promote literacy of engineering engineering careers or the interaction of society with the development and use of design. technological solutions. Facilitators modeled pedagogical practices for supporting learning in engineering design. B. Pedagogical These practices included the use of

Conference Session

Undergraduate Track - Technical Session II

Collection

2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference

Authors

Elisabeth (Lisa) Stoddard, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Geoff Pfeifer, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Undergraduate Education

, calculations, etc.). The goal, in part, isto create tools and procedures that minimize task assignment bias by having teams assign tasksand goals based on individual team member’s assets and/or areas in which that team memberwants to build upon or grow. See a sample student asset map and a sample team asset chartbelow. In the sections that follow, we discuss both the benefits and limitations of asset mappingfor minimizing task assignment bias and for creating more equitable team dynamics.Figure 1: Sample Student Asset Map Team Asset ChartSkill and Content Areas in B Term Team Member’s Relevant Assets

Conference Session

Race/Ethnicity Track - Technical Session VII

Collection

2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference

Authors

Monica L. Ridgeway, Vanderbilt University ; Ebony Omotola McGee, Vanderbilt University; Dara Elizabeth Naphan-Kingery, Vanderbilt University; Amanda J. Brockman, Vanderbilt University

Tagged Topics

Race/Ethnicity

States. National Academies Press.Major, B., & O'Brien, L. T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 393-421.Malone, K. R., & Barabino, G. (2009). Narrations of race in STEM research settings: Identity formation and its discontents. Science Education, 93(3), 485-510.Running Head: RACIALIZED ISOLATING INTERACTIONS 24Martin, D. B. (2009). Researching race in mathematics education. Teachers College Record, 111(2), 295-338.McGee, E. O. (2016). Devalued Black and Latino racial identities: A byproduct of college STEM success? American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1626–1662.McGee, E.O. (2017

Conference Session

Computing Technology Applications-I

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zhen Wu, University of Colorado, Boulder; Christopher Lynnly Hovey, University of Colorado, Boulder; Leisa D. Thompson, University of Virginia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology

was subsequently excluded from any application or acceptance calculation, but was included in new enrollments, declared majors, and graduations. b Net Increase Percent: 100 percent equals no change, above 100% indicates a net increase; for example, 122% represents a 22% increase above the pre-program year. Values ≥ 200% represent a doubling (or more) of raw numbers for the category and group represented in the row.More salient to this study, substantial growth was also observed in the number of women’sapplications, acceptances, new enrollments, and declared majors across the seven schools.Comparing the pre-program year (AY 2011-2012) with the post-program year (AY 2014-2015),both the number of women who applied

Conference Session

Mentoring Practices and Project Teams

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Suzette R. Burckhard, South Dakota State University; Joanita M. Kant, South Dakota State University; Francis Arpan; Ross Peder Abraham, South Dakota State University; Gregory J. Michna, South Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

-two percent of participants planned to attend graduate school in the second-yearsurvey (Table 3). Overall, about half of respondents reported intending to obtain employmentin their STEM field upon graduation with a B. S. degree (Table 3). 9 Table 2. Number of College Credits Earned by OMEGA Recipient Respondents by Percentages at the Time of the Surveys. # 2014-15 2015-16 Credits Cohort Cohort n=26 of 29 n=34 of 35 91 and > 35% 36% 61-90 23

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Muhammad Dawood, New Mexico State University; Karen Trujillo, New Mexico State University; Patti Wojahn, New Mexico State University; Melissa J. Guynn, New Mexico State University; Luis Manuel Rangel Jr.; S. M. Yahea Mahbub, New Mexico State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

” students as those who either increased by 10 points or morebetween Exam 1 and Exam 3 or maintained a “B” or above across the semester. This category of“good” students accounted for about 39% of the total population in Fall 2017 (98 of the 252 totalin Fall 2017). Within this 39% of “good” students, three-quarters were more likely than werestudents not categorized as “good” to maintain their MMAI scores throughout the course, withan average variation of just one unit (out of 60) increase or decrease between pre- and post-surveys. This suggests that “good” students might come in with an established awareness ofmetacognitive practices for learning.As we move forward, we will continue to examine our results more deeply, assessing resultsfrom the

Conference Session

Program Evaluation Studies

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

J. Jill Rogers, University of Arizona; Amy Annette Rogers, Delaware State University; James C. Baygents, University of Arizona

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

formal and informal education venues, and developed robotics outreach programs for children’s museums and K-12 schools. Rogers is a certified teacher and holds a Master’s of Science in Education. Her Master’s thesis topic examined middle school student attitudes towards robotics and focused on gender differences. She is a member of the National Science Teachers Association, Philanthropic Educational Organization (P.E.O) and American Society for Engineering Edu- cation. Her interest lies in the K-12 pathways to engineering and ways to bring young people, particularly under represented populations, into STEM careers.Dr. Amy Annette Rogers, Delaware State University Dr. Amy Rogers has an earned Ph.D. in Social Psychology

Conference Session

International Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jiaojiao Fu, Beihang University; Deborah M. Grzybowski, Ohio State University; Qing Lei, Beihang University; Dongya Cheng, Tibet University

Tagged Divisions

International

colleagues from OSU in the United State and BUAA in China,who had provided the curriculum materials for our research.References[1] J. J. Clauss, “The benefits of honors education for all college students,” Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, vol. 12, no. 2, Fall-Winter 2011.[2] X. Li, “The significance and functions of honors education to undergraduate education,” Journal of China University Teaching, pp. 92-96, 2014.[3] M. Li, J. Li, and L. Yu, “A review of the training objectives and selection criteria of honors education in American colleges and universities,” Journal of China University Teaching, pp. 94-96, 2009.[4] R. M. Marra, B. Palmer, and T. A. Litzinger, “The effects of a first-year

Conference Session

Engineering Workforce Track - Session VI

Collection

2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference

Authors

Lesley M. Berhan, University of Toledo; Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Engineering Workforce

to the survey. The majority of the student respondents were from PurdueUniversity Polytechnic Institute and the University of Toledo. Responses were also receivedfrom the University of Dayton, the University of Akron, and Kent State University. The majorityof the respondents (90.5%) were domestic students who attended high school in the UnitedStates or a US territory. The gender split of students responding to the survey was approximately80% male, 20% female. The ethnic and age breakdown of respondents are shown in the Figure 1below. Figure 2 shows the distribution of respondents by major. (a) (b)Figure 1 (a) Ethnicity and (b) age demographics of respondents to ET

Conference Session

Maker Communities and Authentic Problem Solving

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Muhammad Pervej Jahan, Miami University; Shahnaz J. Aly, Western Kentucky University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

questions: (a) Does the gender or immigration status have any relation with the participation of undergraduates in research? (b) Can the college year and GPA be an indicator of students’ interests in UR? (c) Is there any trend in future career focus for students who engage in UR? (d) Does participating in UR help in their professional development? (e) What kind of research expectation(s) are logical as an outcome from small research grants for a period of a semester to a year? (f) Does UR promote faculty development as well in teaching – focused universities?ResultsResults of the 13 projects undertaken by faculty are presented in the table 1 provided in theappendix.Table 1: Summary of the undergraduate research

Conference Session

LGBTQ+ Track - Technical Session III

Collection

2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference

Authors

Robyn Sandekian, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity, LGBTQ+

investigation,” [Robert H. Smith School Research Paper No. RHS06-14]. Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1088182. Mar. 9, 2011. [Accessed Dec. 1, 2017][18] O. Richard, A. McMillan, K. Chadwick, & S. Dwyer, “Employing an innovation strategy inracially diverse workforces: Effects on firm performance.” Group & Org. Manage., vol. 28, no.1, pp. 107-126, 2003. Available https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601102250022. [Accessed Dec. 1,2017][19] Loyd, D. L., Wang, C. S., Phillips, K. W., & Lount, R. B. Social category diversitypromotes premeeting elaboration: The role of relationship focus. Org. Sci., vol. 24, no. 3, pp.757-772, 2013. Available https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.076. [Accessed Dec. 1, 2017]1[20] K. W. Phillips, “How diversity works

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division: Self Efficacy

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stacey Leigh Kelly, Virginia Tech; Darren K. Maczka, Virginia Tech; Jacob R. Grohs, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Paper ID #23564Exploring Engineering Major Choice and Self-concept Through First-yearSurveysMs. Stacey Leigh Kelly, Virginia Tech Stacey Kelly is a doctoral student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She re- ceived her M.S. in Materials Engineering from Purdue University and her B.S. in Chemical Engineering from North Carolina State University. Her research interests include access to higher education, broaden- ing participation in engineering, and student success and retention.Darren K. Maczka, Virginia Tech Darren Maczka is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His

Conference Session

Mathematics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emre Tokgoz, Quinnipiac University

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics

approaching from or number of computationsyou can count here? …in terms of location, what is the difference?RP 15: This is around zero (pointing the Maclaurin series), this (pointing the series centered at x=2) is 2.Interviewer: ….is there a difference between them in terms of function?RP 15: This is (pointing the series centered at x=2) bigger than this one (pointing the Maclaurin)Overall only 16 out of 17 participants responded to question (c). Only 37.5 % of the participants had the correctresponse to question (b). Majority of the participants corrected or responded right to the question during theinterviews. One of the participants preferred to not answer the question.Finite & Infinite Maclaurin Series DifferenceIn this section participating

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Deanna H. Matthews, Carnegie Mellon University; H. Scott Matthews, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

. Allen, B. Allenby, J. Crittenden, C. Davidson, C. Hendrickson, H. S. Matthews, “Sustainability in Engineering Education and Research at U.S. Universities”, Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43 (15), pp. 5558– 5564, 2009.[6] M. Bilec, C. Hendrickson, A. Landis and H. S. Matthews, ‘Updating the Benchmark Sustainable Engineering Education Report – Trends from 2005 to 2010’, Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, June 26-29, 2011, 7 pages.[7] H. S. Matthews, C. Hendrickson, and D. Matthews, Life Cycle Assessment: Quantitative Approaches for Big Decisions, http://www.lcatextbook.com/, 2015

Conference Session

Engaging Faculty Across Disciplines, Colleges, and Institutions

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jinsung Cho, California State Polytechnic University Pomona; Giuseppe Lomiento, California State Polytechnic University Pomona; Gad M. Ghada, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Katrin Terstegen, Cal Poly Pomona

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 1- extremely negative to 5- extremely positive 1 -always to 5-never (a) Resolution of conflicts between designer (b) How often do you think conflicts will be resolved and contractor are usually: in your favor before going to court? Figure 4: Students’ perception of conflicts with other disciplinesWhen students were asked to prioritize a list of priorities on a project from 1-5 (with 1 being mostimportant and 5 being least important), it was seen that in the two consecutive surveys, all studentsranked ‘owner satisfaction’, as

Conference Session

Undergraduate Peer Educators: Mentoring, Observing, Learning

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chandra Anne Turpen, University of Maryland, College Park; Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park; Jennifer Radoff, University of Maryland, College Park; Andrew Elby, University of Maryland, College Park; Hannah Sabo; Gina Marie Quan, University of Maryland, College Park

Tagged Topics

ASEE Board of Directors, Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Successes and challenges in supporting undergraduate peer educators to notice and respond to equity considerations within design teamsAbstractWe describe and analyze our efforts to support Learning Assistants (LAs)—undergraduate peereducators who simultaneously take a 3-credit pedagogy course—in fostering equitable teamdynamics and collaboration within a project-based engineering design course. Tonso andothers have shown that (a) inequities can “live” in mundane interactions such as those amongstudents within design teams and (b) those inequities both reflect and (re)produce broadercultural patterns and narratives (e.g. Wolfe & Powell, 2009; Tonso, 1996, 2006a, 2006b;McLoughlin, 2005). LAs could

Conference Session

Disability Track - Technical Session IV

Collection

2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference

Authors

Canek Moises Luna Phillips, Rice University; Yvette E. Pearson P.E., Rice University

Tagged Topics

Disability

Paper ID #240892018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29New Affirmative Action Federal Contractor Regulations: An Opportunity forAll Engineering Organizations to Broaden the Participation of People withDisabilitiesDr. Canek Moises Luna Phillips, Rice University Canek Phillips (P’urepecha) is a postdoctoral research associate at Rice University in the Brown School of Engineering. Canek’s research interests broadly relate to efforts to broaden participation in engineering. Currently, he is working on a project to improve mathematics education for visually

Conference Session

International Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Victor Taratukhin, SAP America; Yury V. Kupriyanov, SAP ; Chris Welch Ph.D., International Space University; Valentina Anikushina, SAP SE

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International

assessment of the deliverables by the jury 10In the very near future, SAP University Alliances/Next-Gen plans to organize further hackathons ondifferent topics to help young talents enrich their theoretical education with practical experience.5. References: [1] Welz, B., Rosenberg, A. (2018): SAP Next-Gen. Springer [in press] [2] Brown, T. (2008): Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, 84-92 [3] Mabogunje, A., Sonalkar, N., Leifer, L. (2016): Design Thinking: A New Foundational Science for Engineering. In International Journal of Engineering Education. 32 (3): 1540-1556 [4] United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. UN

Conference Session

Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ona Egbue, University of South Carolina, Upstate

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy

., Biggers, S. B., Moss, W. F., Ohland, M. W., & Schiff, S. D. (2010). Student-centered active, cooperative learning in engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26, 1097-1110.Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. June 23-26, 2013. Atlanta GA.Norman, S. and Wills D., (2015). Flipped Classrooms in Economic Instruction –It’s not all or nothing, National Conference on Teaching and Research on Economic Education, May 27 - May 29, 2015. Minneapolis MN.Lavelle, J. P., Stimpson, M. T., & Brill, E. D. (2013). Flipped out engineering economy: Converting a traditional class to

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Ross Pfluger, Colorado School of Mines; Junko Munakata Marr, Colorado School of Mines; Gary Vanzin; Robert L. Siegrist, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

sustainable onsitesanitation solutions.Future efforts may compare corresponding student presentations for these projects tolook for similar trends. We also may control for instructor by evaluating projects underpre-intervention conditions with the second instructor. We also recommend testing theeffect of including vs. excluding the explicit grading criterion for consideration of non-technical factors.ReferencesAizawa, A. (2003). An information-theoretic perspective of tf-idf measures. Information Processing and Management, 39(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306- 4573(02)00021-3Blei, D. M., Edu, B. B., Ng, A. Y., Edu, A. S., Jordan, M. I., & Edu, J. B. (2003). Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3

Conference Session

Motivation, Attitudes, and Beliefs

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bashirah Ibrahim, Ohio State University; Peter Rogers, Ohio State University; Denny C. Davis, Ohio State University; Lin Ding, Ohio State University; Kaycee Ash, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

peer feedbackBased on the feedback, we made six main changes to the instruments. They are: (a) change theLikert scale from 1-5 to 0-10, (b) change the Strongly Disagree/Strongly Agree descriptors toRarely/Most of the time, (c) use a sliding scale to slow down students to minimize the risk ofsuperficial engagement in the task, (d) randomly list intrinsic motivations from extrinsic ones inthe attitudes instrument, and have five sections of four questions for the behaviors instrument, (e)rewrite or replace various items to prevent ambiguity and make them easier to understand, and(f) include a peer assessment section for the behaviors instrument. These changes resulted in anupdated version of

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waddah Akili, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

; materials, and concrete durability. His interests also include: contemporary issues of engineering education in general, and those of the Middle East and the Arab Gulf States in particular. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 How Engineering Design Learning May be Improved: Thoughts, Practices, and RecommendationsAbstract: Design is considered by most to be the central activity of engineering. Also, it isknown that engineering programs should graduate engineers who can design effectively to meetsocial and environmental needs. Though the role and perception of design across a wide range ofeducational institutions have improved markedly in recent years; however, both

Conference Session

Mathematics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carl Pettis, Alabama State University; Rajendran Swamidurai, Alabama State University; Ash Abebe, Auburn University; David Shannon, Auburn University

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics

solutions obtained using hand calculation.Lab-2: In this lab, the main contents include graphical visualization for some real data. Manydatasets are publically available from sites such as kaggle.com and data.gov. Graphicalvisualization ranges from simple graphics such as histogram, boxplot, and scatterplot toadvanced graphics such as PCA projection plots, trellis plots, maps, etc. Students need to exploresome real data using graphics to explore and discover information from the real data.Take-home project: Students were used some simulation examples relevant to the real world.Topics for recommendation include (a) gambling games; (b) biological evolution; (c) finance; (d)social network; (e) forensic science; etc. Depending on the students

Conference Session

COED: IOT and Cybersecurity

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Curtis Cohenour P.E., Ohio University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

Control (MAC) addresses, and Terminal Control Protocol (TCP)IP are discussed. The OSI seven layer model is introduced, as well as the differences between theOpen System Interconnection (OSI) model and TCP IP. The basics of wireless versus opencommunications and how this relates to the project are all part of the pre-lab lecture.Figure 1 The Internet of Things (IoT) lab activity connects the students phone “A” to theArduino “B”. Includes public domain images.One example used in class is an electric smoker. The smoker is an IoT device. The user startsand stops the smoker, and sets the temperature from his/her cellphone. The IoT device reportsthe temperature of the meat, and the on off status of the heating element. This is represented inthe lab by

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Abhinav Dixit, Arizona State University; Uday Shankar Shanthamallu, Arizona State University; Andreas S. Spanias, Arizona State University; Sunil Rao; Sameeksha Katoch, Arizona State University; Mahesh K. Banavar, Clarkson University; Gowtham Muniraju, Arizona State University; Jie Fan, Arizona State University; Photini Spanias, Arizona State University; Andrew Strom, Corona Del Sol High School; Constantinos Pattichis; Huan Song

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Paper ID #23640Multidisciplinary Modules on Sensors and Machine LearningAbhinav Dixit, Arizona State University I am a PhD student at School of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering at Arizona State University. My research interest includes early detection of neurological diseases through irregularities in speech. I also work as a Research Assistant at SenSIP Center, ECEE at ASU. I am currently involved in developed of JDSP HTML5, an interactive DSP software developed in HTML5.Mr. Uday Shankar Shanthamallu, Arizona State University ”I received my B.S degree in Electronics and Communications from the National

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jonathan Beever, University of Central Florida

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

, Integrating Intellect and theCreation of Bioethics.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9(1): 25-51, 1999.[2] T.L. Beauchamp and J.F. Childress. Principles of Biomedical Ethics: Seventh Edition. NewYork: Oxford University Press, 2013.[3] D. Callahan. Bioethics and Policy: Hastings Center Bioethics Briefings.https://www.thehastingscenter.org/briefingbook/bioethics-and-policy-a-history/, 2018.[4] P. Singer, Animal Liberation. New York: Random House, Inc, 1975.[5] T. Regan, The Case of Animal Rights. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.[6] B. Rollin, Science and Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.[7] J.B. Callicott, “Whither Conservation Ethics?” Conservation Biology 4(1):15-20, 1990.[8] O.C. Ferrell and L. Ferrell

Conference Session

Connecting BME education to the "real world"

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anthony E. Felder, University of Illinois, Chicago; Miiri Kotche, University of Illinois, Chicago; Jennifer D. Olson, University of Illinois at Chicago; Janet Aderemi Omitoyin, University of Illinois at Chicago

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

, Puerto Rico, 2013.[13] S. C. Silverstein, J. Dubner, J. Miller, S. Glied, and J. D. Loike, “Teachers Participationin Research Programs Improves Their Students Achievement in Science,” ​Science​, vol. 326, no.5951, pp. 440–442, 2009.[14] A. E. Landis, C. D. Schunn, M. C. Rothermel, S. Shrake, and B. Niblick. “Developmentof a High School Engineering Research Program: Findings from a Research Experience forTeachers (RET) Site,” presented at 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver,BC, 2011.[15] S. S. Klein-Gardner and A. C. Spolarich. “Impacts of the Vanderbilt University ResearchExperience for Teachers Program 2008 - 2010: Analysis of Student Surveys RegardingMotivational Impact,” presented at 2011 ASEE Annual Conference &