relationship between K-5 educators and scientist mentors allowed for the integrationof the NGSS into their research experience. Educators were encouraged to ask questions, analyzedata, design solutions, and obtain, evaluate, and communicate information. This structurefacilitated relationships and scientific debates that deepened their understanding of theengineering problem and process. The educators had authentic engineering experience in thecentralized teaching laboratory during morning sessions, followed by afternoon sessionsdedicated to curriculum development. The K-5 educators integrated the engineering design skillsinto classroom applications by creating STEM-inspired curricula, which facilitated technical andPD relationships.The afternoon
, experimentation, modelingIntroductionLaboratory is an essential part of the undergraduate curriculum in every field of engineering [1].Although the number and types of laboratories can vary from discipline to discipline and schoolto school, undergraduate laboratories are very important because they introduce students toimportant engineering equipment and illustrate many of the principles and correlations that arepresented in the classroom. Laboratories also give students a chance to work with their handsand develop important teamwork and leadership skills. Written and oral communication skillsare strengthened in the preparation of written reports and oral presentations. Indeed, ABETCourse Instructional Outcomes 3 (an ability to communicate effectively
embedded system course curriculum. A traditional embedded system curriculum coverslearning about microcontroller architecture and hardware and software aspects of microcontrollersand applications. In order to prepare students for more complex tasks required in embedded systemsand teach advanced topics of embedded systems, an Embedded Intelligent System Design course wascreated and initially offered in Fall 2019. Moreover, this course was also offered in Fall 2022 andSpring 2024. This paper introduces the topics of the course and practice session and term projectcontent in this embedded intelligent system design course. Course topics included Search algorithmsNumPy, Pandas, Sci-kit Learn, TensorFlow, Embedded Linux, and OpenCV. The primary
Paper ID #16507How We Know They’re Learning: Comparing Approaches to LongitudinalAssessment of Transferable Learning OutcomesDr. Brian M. Frank, Queen’s University Brian Frank is the DuPont Canada Chair in Engineering Education Research and Development, and the Director of Program Development in the Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science at Queen’s Uni- versity where he works on engineering curriculum development, program assessment, and developing educational technology. He is also an associate professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering.Ms. Natalie Simper, Queen’s University Natalie Simper coordinates a Queen’s
LaboratoryAbstractPresently there is a need to develop more effective ways to integrate experimental design into theengineering curriculum. To address this need, we are developing virtual laboratories that providestudents a capstone experience in which they can apply experimental design in a context similarto that of a practicing engineer in industry. In a virtual laboratory, simulations based onmathematical models implemented on a computer are used to replace the physical laboratory.However, as opposed to being constructed as a direct one-to-one replacement, the virtuallaboratory is intended to complement the physical laboratories in the curriculum so that certainspecific elements of the experimental design process are addressed. We have previously reportedon the
Paper ID #31809Full Paper: [Fostering Entrepreneurship Through Targeted Adversity: ASenior Design Case Study]Mr. Nicholas Hosein, UC Davis Nicholas is a PhD candidate at the University of California Davis with a background in computer ar- chitecture, algorithms and machine learning. His current focus is advancing the electrical engineering curriculum at UC Davis to be more industry relevant in terms of skill sets taught.Prof. Lee Michael Martin, University of California, Davis Lee Martin studies people’s efforts to enhance their own learning environments, with a particular focus on mathematical, engineering, and design
classroom instructors who modeled exemplary use oftechnology. The students were required to enroll in a technology rich engineering coursecalled Toying With TechnologySM which offered a positive, comfortable, and stimulatingatmosphere in order to introduce preservice teachers to aspects of science, math, andtechnology in the context of engineering. As a major component of the course, studentswere required to research and design an Engineering ABC Book tailored to both K-12students and classroom curriculum. A description of the Toying With TechnologySMcourse, cohort, and the Engineering ABC Book Project are examined and described.IntroductionToday, more than ever before, technological competence has become crucial tomaintaining our nation’s position
Methods section. To conclude thissegment, we provide the research question pursued in this paper which has an exploratory nature:Research question: How does bringing Entrepreneurial Mindset to the design of machinerythrough a bio-inspired design project with aesthetic objectives impact students’ self-reportedexperiences?2. Literature Review2.1 Lack of Interdisciplinary Project-Based Learning Integrated Across EngineeringCoursesMost engineering education today does not adequately equip students to address complexand ill-structured technical problems that involve different stakeholders, uncertainty in the successcriteria, and interdisciplinary application of knowledge. Such problems are called wicked problems[3] and constitute some of the most
difficult time to follow algorithms and programming sequences. Infact, some studies show that while students can often learn the syntax of individualcommands in any programming language quickly, the skill of combining commands intoa program and integrating them with a hardware device is harder to learn.2In order to better prepare freshmen students and introduce them to available lab resourcesand general engineering and computer science curriculum, the Department ofEngineering Science at Sonoma State University has been requiring students to take anintroductory course to engineering. Introduction to Engineering (ES110) is a two-credithour core engineering course with one hour lecture and 2 ½ hours of lab per week.Majority of students enrolled in
January 2004 under the supervision of Dr. Reginald Perry. Upon completion of his PhD, Dr. Soares was immediately hired as an assistant professor (Tenure Track) in the Electronic Engineering Technology department at FAMU. Dr. Soares has made many contributions to the department, from curriculum improvements, to ABET accreditation, and more recently by securing a grant with the department of education for more than half a million dollars. Page 22.1054.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 DSP Based Jitter Measuring MethodIntroductionIn the past decade
encourage students to independently continue their studies beyond the course.Curriculum. The curriculum consists of a series of self-contained laboratory exercises thatincrementally build upon one another. The exercises were adapted from laboratory exercisesoriginally developed for use in a sophomore level, undergraduate electrical and computerengineering curriculum [7, 8, 9]. In developing the program an emphasis was placed onminimizing theoretical lectures while maximizing student investigation and discovery throughhands-on laboratory exercises.A typical schedule is provided in Table 1 while a summary of laboratory exercises is provided inTable 2. The schedule is divided into 12 separate 2 hour and 15 minute lessons. A 15 minutebreak is provided
and/or engage in an active exploration. Most of our activities are completed in teams, emphasizing communication and joint problem‐solving. Lesson plans fall into three categories: module‐based, project‐based, or challenge‐based. Table 10 gives a description of each category. The curriculum team ensures that the syllabus covers concepts from all the major engineering disciplines. The list of lesson plans for Fall 2010 is given in Table 11. When developing lesson plans, we take full advantage of the fairly comprehensive collections of engineering lesson plans that already exist including but not limited to: teachengineering.org, Proceedings of the 2011 PSW American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference
broad areas of learning that are importantfor equipping students for their working lives which they believed could be assessed [29].Inspection of exhibit 3 shows them to be very similar to those listed in the Minnesota survey.Other comparisons with American reports were made in the same report.ConclusionHowever good, however poor the data several conclusions may be reached. First, it is no longerpossible for educators, industrialists and policy makers to pay lip service to the need to educatefor adaptability and flexibility and develop personal transferable skills. The curriculum needs tobe evaluated in these terms. But it cannot be an evaluation that is independent of what happensbefore, and what happens afterwards. Higher education has to be
are more authentic as well as provide broader access to thesepractices to students regardless of their backgrounds/majors. However, this study focuses onunderstanding the influence this program has on students’ perceived learning and development ofinnovation skills such as integrative learning, teamwork, and problem-solving.Collaborative learning (CL) as an approach to learning has been shown to benefit studentssocially, psychologically, and academically (Laal & Ghodsi, 2011), and as such, incorporatingthis strategy within innovation education may help provide students with richer learningexperiences. Specifically, CL has been found to develop social support for learners, builddiversity in understanding concepts, develop learning
collaborative teaching methods has been supported by over $14.5 million from the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received Best Paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008 and 2011 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011. Dr. Ohland is Chair of the IEEE Curriculum and Pedagogy Committee and an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE and IEEE.Dr. Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monica E. Cardella is the Director of the INSPIRE Institute for Pre-College Engineering Education and is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University
involving not just an engineering faculty member, but also acurrent engineering student and an engineer currently practicing in industry.Case StudiesSottile (2024) collects a recent review of literature on case study pedagogy on engineering ethicseducation, highlights of which are presented here. It should be noted that “[c]ase studies areconsidered to be the most popular method to teach engineering ethics” (Martin, Conlon, &Bowe, p. 47). Harris et al. (1996) decades ago called for more holistic treatments of engineeringethics education, going so far as to make the case for engineering curricula to consider ethicalissues as often as possible, both within the formal curriculum but also via extracurricularopportunities. Harris et al. (1996) also
into there courses in order to receive graduate course credit. The implementation ofsome of these laboratories K-12 classroom is described.The institute was evaluated through an engineering perception and knowledge survey administered before andafter the institute, as well as through daily feedback forms. Results of these evaluations are also given anddiscussed.IntroductionThe SouthEastern Consortium for Minorities in Engineering (SECME) was founded in 1975 to increase minorityappearance in engineering by improving the science and mathematics curriculum for pre-college students. The Page 1.428.1
time scales, the eventual winnowing of diversity is a long way off. Theparticular organism we want to talk about is an integrated math and electronics modular package.The modules incorporate Electronics Workbench [1] for circuit simulation, and Maple [2] formathematical simulation. What's more, the curriculum is further organized by the use of a“supervisor package”, called Electronics Testbench, that guides the student through the learningprocess by providing tutorials and practice quizzes. The instructor can concentrate on thecreative task of instilling the crucial concepts rather than being a drill master for rote exercises.Maple has hot key linking built in. Electronics Testbench does not provide for unlimitedhypertext, but it does provide
ofconnected device. The remaining five competencies of this digital badge (digital forensics,incident management, infrastructure design, systems integration, and vulnerabilities assessment)are also technical competencies but require skills and knowledge of specific technical situations,equipment, digital devices, and scenarios in an automated working environment. These are allcategorized as “technical competencies” in the NICE framework.The TRACKS-CN Cyber 4 RAM Digital Badge provides modular content for the learner ofthese competencies using the basic principles of cybersecurity. It applies these principles Proceedings of the 2024 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2024, American Society
solving physical problems.K-12 members’ perceptions seem to hinge on building an understanding and appreciation ofwhat engineering is and how it impacts society, and of preparing and motivating students tobecome engineers. Open-ended responses provided phrases like integrating STEM intoactivities, projects, presentations, scoring rubrics, and assessment shared across the members. Abroader view included educating both students and the general public on the importance of,process of and implementation of engineering in the world today. K-12 members also viewedengineering education as a research field of teaching and learning. Members of this group wereopen to the PhD in traditional engineering with interest in teaching or a PhD in education
as an elective, reaching arelatively small audience. Recently, authors increasingly argue that teaching an entrepreneurialmindset requires an integrated approach.2,3,4Kettering University has adopted this approach by trying to incorporate entrepreneurial ideasdirectly into existing classes. This can be difficult to accomplish for several reasons. First,engineering professors find it difficult to make room in the course syllabus for an entrepreneurial Page 22.845.2education. Further, many faculty have not been exposed to the “entrepreneurial mindset” andthus do not feel prepared to broach the subject in class. Kettering University has
improvement withinthe laboratory curriculum. While 69% of respondents agreed that lab exercises rated either as“Very Effective” or as “Effective” for active learning, the average rating for “the overall qualityand frequency of active learning” in laboratory courses was only 2.4 on a scale of 0 to 4. 51% ofrespondents asserted that the frequency of active learning in lab classes should be increased. Inresponse to what topics they felt exposure to was valuable in a mechanical engineeringcurriculum, 73% responded with advanced analytical software (e.g. MATLAB), 71% withcomputer control & data acquisition, 51% with integrated PLC control, and 47% withmicroprocessors.The second survey prompted participants to rank the labs they had participated in on
in which co-designers are empowered to make real and substantial design decisions. Research in this area hasaddressed the cooperative process of design and development of expertise, while includingstudents in pedagogical planning processes. In particular, studies have found that students areable to play an important role as co-designers and the end products are better designed to meettheir personal needs and expectations [12].In our research, Participatory Design Approach was selected to redesign our instructional systemusing CPBL, since we believe that by engaging the target learners in the design process, we canshape a curriculum that better fits the learning characteristics of our students, and to promote“locality, diversity, involvement
. civil engineering community: faculty development, integration of the civil engineering curriculum, practitioner involvement in education, and the professional degree.1The fourth of these issue areas—the professional degree—reflected a growing consensus that thetraditional four-year baccalaureate degree was becoming increasingly inadequate as formalacademic preparation for the professional practice of civil engineering. In October 1998, the callfor action issued at the CEEC ’95 resulted in the passage of ASCE Policy Statement 465—Academic Prerequisites for Licensure and Professional Practice. The initial version of thispolicy stated that the Society “supports the concept of the master’s degree as the FirstProfessional Degree
practitioners.Cynthia D. Anderson, Alula Consulting Cynthia (Cindy) Anderson (she/her/hers) is the founder and CEO of Alula Consulting. Cindy specializes in innovative sustainability- and online-focused research and curriculum projects for academic institu- tions, non-profits, government and corporations. Cindy has taught thousands of people through courses and workshops, around the world and online, in the fields of biology, sustainability and biomimicry. She is honored to be a collaborative partner on the Engineering for One Planet initiative since its inception, co- author of the EOP Framework and new framework integration guides, and active EOP Network Member. Cindy holds a MS from Oregon State University, a MEd from Griffith
evolution simulator would be enhanced with modular and more varied functionality. Starting points for such would likely include making the AgentComplexity value set per agent rather than as a global variable as well as adding environmental variations in shape and possible forms of selection criteria in the form of food or a “kill” mechanism. Adding accessibility options like colorblind adaptations or easier to read text would allow greater educational flexibility. 2. The second possibility would be to test the application of this software in an educational environment for curriculum development and teaching pedagogy. There has been expressed interest by both computing and biology departments for cross
such places as Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the Universities of Texas and Wisconsin in the U.S., Kyoto and Nagoya Universities in Japan, the Ioffe Institute in Russia, and Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology in Ukraine. He was ECSE Department Head from 2001 to 2008 and served on the board of the ECE Department Heads Association from 2003 to 2008. He is presently the Education Director for the SMART LIGHTING NSF ERC.Dr. Kathleen Meehan, Virginia Tech Dr. Kathleen Meehan is presently an associate professor in the Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Virginia Tech. Her previous academic positions were at at the University of Denver and West Virginia University. Prior to moving
and ML. In alignment with Cal Poly’s Learn byDoing philosophy, a strong emphasis of the course has been placed on real-world engineeringproblems using materials data. A significant part of the raison d'être of this course was an avenueto integrate the emerging topics of AI and ML into the MS&E curriculum at Cal Poly. Themajority of the students taking this course have little to no knowledge of computer science,computer programming (e.g., Matlab or Python), or algorithm development. This presents anopportunity to be innovative in the approach taken to introduce the topics of AI and ML.At present, one week (3 hours lab time) is devoted to exploring the concepts of AI and ML. CalPoly transitioning from quarters to semesters will expand this
suggest reducing barriers and structuring opportunities tofit in the engineering curriculum will increase student participation2. Page 25.559.3We decided to look into these issues. The first question is the length of the program. We foundthat there are semester-length programs set up by the College of Engineering that require specialarrangement between universities so that the classes are equivalent. There are currently no FLPsoffered at the University of Utah for engineering credit. We decided an FLP was necessary tomeet our constraints. However, in order for an engineering FLP to be successful, it must be morethan just a trip and it must have a
complex cognitive processes. Danielle received her BS in chemical engineering from OSU and her MS from the University of Washington.Derek Meyers-Graham, Oregon State University Derek Meyers-Graham is an undergraduate student in Computer Science and Mathematics at OSU. Page 11.621.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Experiential Learning of Design of Experiments Using a Virtual CVD ReactorAbstractPresently there is a need for more effective ways to integrate statistical methodologies such asDesign of Experiments (DOE) into the engineering curriculum. We have