systems. Where appropriate, these exercises should involve team-based work among students. Effectiveness and practicality of designs should be key components of the evaluation of students’ work.If design projects are used, students should be required to develop, follow, and periodicallyprogress report on their design developments. Evaluation should consider the quality of thepresentations and the professionalism demonstrated by the students.The proposed IPFC-IMD system, which is implemented mainly with discrete components,provides various teaching components to enhance EMET 325 Electric Drives course. It will beuseful for the practical dc and ac motor drive systems sections. Possible teaching topics and theirbrief explanations are listed
digitalsystem simulation course. Simulation, employing a sophisticated computation system, lendsreality to the solution process and matches the procedures used by practicing engineers in thatME speciality.I. IntroductionOn the quarter system, the ME faculty taught a classical vibrations course emphasizing one andtwo degrees of freedom systems and their mathematical solutions. A follow-on, one-credit hourdigital simulation laboratory (requiring the vibrations class as a pre-requisite) emphasized thenumerical solutions of differential equations using such higher-level programs as SL-1(developed by Xerox in the late 1960’s), CSMP (developed by IBM in the late 1960’s), ACSL1,and now MATLAB®2; this evolution followed the introduction of each new package
test, 1999.8. McCaulley, M.H., Mary, H., “the MBTI and Individual Pathways in Engineering Design”, Engineering Education, Vol. 80, pp. 537-542, July/Aug. 1990.9. McCaulley, M.H., “Psychological Types in Engineering: Implications for Teaching,” Engineering Education, Vol. 66, No. 7, pp. 729-736, April 1976.10. McCaulley, M.H., et. al., “Applications of Psychological Type in Engineering Education”, Engineering Education, Vol. 73, No. 5, pp. 394-400, Feb. 1983.11. Myers, I.B., McCauley, M.H., Manuel: A Guide to the Development and Use of Myers Briggs Type Indicator (2nd ed.), Palo Alto, CA, Consulting Psychologists Press, 1985.12. Rodman, S.M. Dean, R.K., and Rosati, P.A., “Self-perception of Engineering
. He's the PI on two NSF S-STEM grants providing academic and career guidance to students in CSEM fields. He's a Professor of Electrical Engineering within the Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering at ASU. Prior to joining ASU, he worked at MIT, IBM, AT&T Bell Laboratories and Raytheon Missile Systems. He has consulted for Eglin Air Force Base, Boeing Defense and Space Systems, Honeywell and NASA. He has authored over 190 technical papers and three engineering texts. He has given more than 60 invited presentations - including 13 plenaries. Since 1994, he has directed an extensive engineering mentoring-research program that has served over 300 students. He's an AT&T Bell Labs Fellow, Boeing A.D
technical lessons learned, as well as theirresponse to the case studies. Case study questions were included on homework assignments andexaminations. Survey questions linked student achievement to educational outcomes. Thefocus groups identified additional benefits to the use of case studies. The sophomore studentsobserved that the cases helped build engineering identity, and provided historical understanding.The cases made the technical information relevant and linked theory to practice. In addition, faculty who participated in the case study workshops have been surveyedabout the time commitment required to implement the case studies, and whether the benefitsjustify the investment. Since teaching and revising a course is a time-consuming
the Iowa State University Information Assurance Center. Dr. Jacobson teaches network security and information warfare and has written a textbook on network security. Dr. Jacobson has received two R&D 100 awards for his security technology and has two patents in the area of computer security. Dr. Jacobson has given over 50 presentations in the area of computer security and has testified in front of the U.S. Senate committee of the Judiciary on security issues associated with peer-to-peer networking. Page 22.127.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 AAS + 2
, literacy education, content literacy, and global education as well as assessment and measurement in STEM education. She teaches courses in science education, measurement, literacy and language development, courses in learning and instructional theory, and teacher education research courses. She extensive expertise in assessment, psychometrics, advanced quantitative analyses, and multimodal research design.Dr. Cheryl Matherly, The University of Tulsa Dr. Cheryl Matherly is Vice Provost for Global Education and Applied Assistant Professor of Education at the University of Tulsa, where she has responsibility for the strategic leadership of the university’s plan for comprehensive internationalization. Dr. Matherly’ special
. “Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research.” Ethics and Behavior. 11(3): 219-232. 2001.12 Beck, L., and I. Ajzen. “Predicting dishonest actions using the Theory of Planned Behavior.” Journal of Research in Personality. 25(3):285-301. 1991.Biographical InformationDR. TREVOR S. HARDING is Associate Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at KetteringUniversity. Dr. Harding is Director of the Biomedical Materials Research and the Environmental Scanning ElectronMicroscopy Laboratories at Kettering University. He currently serves on the ERM Division Board of Directors aswell as the Advisory Board for the Kettering University Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning.DR. DONALD D. CARPENTER is Assistant Professor of
population. Questions about enjoyment and ability regarding math andscience were also included to measure their relationship to the choice of scientific or engineeringcareers. In addition to math and science, a compilation of research studies yielded the followinglist of factors related to the likelihood of females choosing to enter an engineering ortechnological field: family income (socioeconomic status), self-confidence, role models, peersupport, teaching methods, education, perceptions of engineering, and sex-rolestereotypes9,10,11,12,13. Several studies particularly emphasized the importance of parental andteacher support in choosing these fields 2,14,15,16. The National Center for Education Statisticsorganizes these factors into three
partner university. An important side benefit in this age of dwindlingeducational resources is that students will have access to the full array of specialized electivetopics, laboratory equipment and practical experiences available at any partner university.From a practical perspective, the Global Engineering College (GEC) model consists of four keyelements that interact in complementary fashion to provide a wide range of internationalexperience and training opportunities: Curriculum Internationalization. International perspectives can be integrated into existing engineering course curricula by replacing generic, context-free assignments and projects with “scenario-based” challenges, in which the same pedagogic exercises are situated
for Engineering Educationcampus is one of four campuses of Penn State to offer a BS in EMET, and at Altoona, theprogram emphasizes manufacturing and automation.1 The students gain skills in a wide varietyof technologies and have available state-of-the-art laboratories, including CAD, controls, andautomation. A machine shop and projects area are also available. The projects area is used forannual student design competitions, including SAE Mini Baja and the ASME Student DesignContest and for student projects as part of the EMET capstone design course.One of the most useful tools students have to help with the development of their capstone designprojects or student design competitions is the fused deposition modeling (FDM) system. TheFDM allows
grants (NSF, 2004) states: “The REU program,through both Supplements and Sites, aims to provide appropriate and valuable educationalexperiences for undergraduate students through research participation. REU projects involvestudents in meaningful ways in ongoing research programs or in research projects speciallydesigned for the purpose. REU projects feature high-quality interaction of students with facultyand/or other research mentors and access to appropriate facilities and professional developmentopportunities. Active research experience is considered one of the most effective ways to attracttalented undergraduates to and retain them in careers in science and engineering, includingcareers in teaching and educational research.”NSF thus expects
problems as a set of equations that may involvethermodynamic property calculations. EES is then able to solve a properly posed problem. Itcan also be used for finding an individual property at a single state. The texts by Sonntag et al.3and Moran and Shapiro4 include programs that can find state properties or generate tables.Several recent ASEE papers have discussed the use of computer property calculations inthermodynamics instruction. Dixon5 suggested that it is time to teach thermodynamics with onlycomputer property calculations. He noted that the U.S. Coast Guard Academy introduces EES inthe first thermodynamics course, and concluded that the “the value of utilizing the programcapabilities makes the learning effort well worthwhile.” Ngo and
to the current members ofWomen in Technology. Of the 81 students involved in the group, 51 responded to the survey, fora 63% response rate.The survey questions were modified from the WEPAN Pilot Climate Survey, designed to assessengineering students’ perceptions of the educational climate at their universities 26. One studyidentified those factors as isolation, the perceived irrelevance of theoretical preparatory courses,negative experiences in laboratory courses, classroom climate, and lack of role models 27. Otherstudies have suggested that the different learning styles of women may influence their desire toenter engineering or technology fields. Finally, Santovec contends that the problem is the imagethat engineering and technology is not
Educ, vol. 16, no. 4, 2017, doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-05-0085.[4] C. J. Atman et al., “Enabling engineering student success: The final report for the center for the advancement of engineering education,” Seattle, WA, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.engr.washington.edu/caee/caee final report 20101102.pdf[5] K. Schneider, A. Bickel, and A. Morrison-Shetlar, “Planning and implementing a comprehensive student-centered research program for first-year STEM undergraduates,” J Coll Sci Teach, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 37–43, 2015, doi: 10.2505/4/jcst15_044_03_37.[6] T. L. Strayhorn, L. L. Long III, J. A. Kitchen, M. S. Williams, and M. E. Stenz, “Academic and social barriers to Black and Latino male collegians’ success in
fill this requirement.Most recently, BIOE 2100 has been modified for specific designation as a “writing-intensive”course at the university level. UGA’s Franklin College Writing Intensive Program (WIP)administers the process by which courses acquire the “W” suffix (i.e., BIOE 2100W) andstipulates what is expected of such courses: The W suffix is used for courses taught as writing intensive, which means that the course includes substantial and ongoing writing assignments that a) facilitate learning; b) teach the communication values of a discipline — for example, its practices of argument, evidence, credibility, and format; c) support writing as a process; and d) prepare students for further writing in their
Paper ID #10565Multidisciplinary Construction Engineering Design ProjectsDr. Cameron J Turner P.E., Colorado School of Mines Dr. Cameron Turner is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering with a research interest in the foundations of design across multiple disciplines. Dr. Turner earned his Ph.D. at the University at Texas in 2005, focusing on Surrogate Model Optimization for Engineering Design. He also holds an MSE from the University of Texas at Austin, with a focus on robotics, and a BSME from the University of Wyoming. He has more than 13 years of experience at Los Alamos National Laboratory, and in 2009
workforce development initiative involving K12 schools and community colleges,and the evaluation of North Carolina’s Race to the Top initiative.Dr. Eric N. Wiebe, North Carolina State University Dr. Wiebe is a Professor in the Department of STEM Education at NC State University and Senior Research Fellow at the Friday Institute for Educational Innovation. A focus of his research and outreach work has been the integration of multimedia and multimodal teaching and learning approaches in STEM instruction. He has also worked on research and evaluation of technology integration in instructional settings in both secondary and post-secondary education. Dr. Wiebe has been a member of ASEE since 1989
now motivated to from other pursue PhD because of faculty) REU. 3 Behavior (+) Use various instruments No Confidence to Advisors very Positive (+) Dream job is to be a No and learned new subjects “self-teach” helpful in researcher or college prior learning process
, "Characterising collaboration: Reflflecting on a partnership between academic support staff and lecturers to help university students learn how to write for the discipline of chemistry," Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 41-53, 2021.Using Tutor-led Support to Enhance Engineering Student Writing for All[11] K. Riegel, "A Scaffolded Approach to Laboratory Report Writing for Non-Major and Introductory Physics Classes," Physics Teacher, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 488-490, 2021.[12] H. Zhang and Y. Li, "Integrating active learning activities and metacognition into STEM writing courses," Advances in Physiology Education, vol. 45, no. 4, p. 902–907, 2021.[13] S. Dinitz and S. Harrington, "The Role of
appeal to their desire to produce broader impacts on their local community.8. xperiential Ethics Instruction in Three Parts Alsion J Kerr, Chase Winterberg, Jeremy Daily, Bradley J. Brummel (The University of Tulsa, USA)Teaching students how to recognize and handle ethical situations is a challenging feat. Lectures and case studies only go so far towards providing students with the tools they will need tofaithfully conduct themselves throughout their career. Experiential role-play simulation serves as a promising auxiliary technique for teaching ethics. For the last seven years, the authors havebeen conducting an interactive ethics training program which involves simulating a litigation experience in which engineering students perform
Institute campus.The building was formerly a commercial office building and is divided into approximately 15flexible/modular work rooms with one or multiple teams assigned to the work rooms. Eachroom includes defined team areas, modular furniture with a workspace for each student, aprinter, a small meeting area with conference table, and usually space for the project manager.Dedicated laboratories have been setup for an electronics shop, machine shop, wet lab, and rapidprototyping equipment. Each student is assigned a desktop computer with necessary software tosupport their work. Work spaces are ‘open’ which facilitates communication among the team.Co-locating the project manager with the student team facilitates both formal and
Paper ID #42115Work-in-Progress: Describing the Epistemic Culture of our Research Teamsfrom Ethnographic ObservationsDr. Courtney June Faber, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Courtney Faber, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo (UB). Prior to joining UB in August of 2023, she was a Research Associate Professor and Senior Lecturer in Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She was also the Director of the Fundamentals of Engineering and Computing Teaching in Higher Education Certificate Program. Her research focuses on
twice a week for 1.5 hours for half a semester – nominally each sectionmeets 14 times. Additionally, a common extra hour in the students’ weekly schedule is blockedoff to provide a time slot for quizzes and open lab. Two instructors and a Teaching Assistantare assigned to each section, providing sufficient opportunities for Instructors/TAs to interactwith individual students and teams throughout lab sessions. Labs 1 through 4 are the focus of this project course. The lectures introduce and sup-port these labs. For each lab, students are required to submit a Report Form which requiresan Instructor/TA signiture for each significant step. This serves to require students to dis-cuss/question their understanding, and to interact with an instructor or
make them transforming the transitional problems into reduced-specificitysuch. Context rich problems have real-world context settings. problems.To increase motivation, one can start problems with “Youare…/you have been…” and then describe situations in such IV. DESCRIPTION AND RESULTS OF THE STUDYcontexts that can motivate the solver to find an answer (e.g., Course Descriptionstart the problems with statements like: you have been hired as The General Physics I (PH-201) course at QCC is an… and your job is…; you are watching TV about… and algebra-based 3 class hours and 2 laboratory hours course (4wonder…; etc). More suggestions on making problems credits). It is a
engineering educatorsmay consider for their courses.Details of ImplementationThree separate instructors have modified this approach to fit their courses, their intendedoutcomes, and their teaching philosophies. In this section we will present a concise overview ofeach implementation, with details provided in attached appendices.Strength of Materials (Spring 2018)The first implementation was in a Strength of Materials course after the instructor looked for anopportunity to implement an ‘epic finale’ inspired by reading the article in the Chronicle ofHigher Education years earlier. On the final exam day, she rode a bicycle into the final exam andasked the students to tell her the three locations most likely to fail during a specific use-case, andthe
engineering and Mechanics at the University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. Papadopoulos has diverse research and teaching interests in structural mechanics and bioconstruction (with emphasis in bamboo); appropriate technology; engineering ethics; and mechanics education. He has served as PI of several NSF-sponsored research projects and is co-author of Lying by Approximation: The Truth about Finite Element Analysis. He is active in the Mechanics Division.Dr. Aidsa I. Santiago-Rom´an, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Dr. Aidsa I. Santiago-Rom´an is a Professor and Chair in the Engineering Sciences and Materials (CIIM) Department at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayag¨uez Campus (UPRM). Dr. Santiago earned a BS and MS
, and other purposes [5], [11]. In some contexts, electronic logs or online portfolios maybe used instead of a physical notebook [11], [12]. In academic and industry laboratories, thesenotebooks are permanent, legal documents that have strict protocols for use in order to clearlydocument procedures, establish intellectual property, and protect research subjects [12], [13].These blank books are a tool of the engineering profession, but are also viewed as pedagogicaltools, recommended as a best practice for undergraduate engineering faculty to use for bothinstructional and assessment purposes [3], [5], [11]. While it has been shown that a blank notebook offers some benefits for engineeringstudents [5], [11], for a student engaging in the
others is what engineers do all of the time. This is irresponsible.”.He adds that “In engineering we take pride in teaching “the fundamentals”. It’s time to explicitlyrecognize that what is fundamental to engineering practice goes beyond the scientific,instrumental rationality; to fail to acknowledge this is “just about unethical”.”.21Wendy Faulkner22 observes that “Their educational grounding in mathematics and science allowsengineers to claim an identity in the material and (mostly) predictable phenomena governed bythe 'laws of nature', backed up by a faith in cause-and-effect reasoning. And this same materialityand scientificity enables them to claim, as the central contribution of engineering design, that itcreates technologies that 'do the
Force Research Laboratory, and his research there focused on development of low ac-loss superconducting films.Daniel Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy DAN JENSEN is a Professor of Engineering Mechanics at the U.S. Air Force Academy. He received his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Colorado at Boulder. He has worked for Texas Instruments, Lockheed Martin, NASA, University of the Pacific, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab and MacNeal-Schwendler Corp. His research includes development of innovative design methodologies and enhancement of engineering education.Kristin Wood, University of Texas-Austin KRISTIN WOOD is the Cullen Trust Endowed Professor in Engineering at The University of