-step comprehensive process for developing and assessing program objectives andprogram outcomes. The eight-step process is in accord with the requirements of the new ABET2000 criteria for accrediting Engineering and Technology programs. The process involves 1. Program objectives definition. 2. Primary assessment of Program objectives every two to three years. 3. Program outcomes definition and their relationship with program objectives. 4. Mapping program outcomes into the curriculum (courses). 5. Implementation of outcome competencies in courses and direct outcome assessment at course level each semester using direct measurement of student performance in each outcome measured in the course. 6. Direct semester program
- search for STEM Equity (UW CERSE) and an affiliate assistant professor of sociology. She has been at UW working on STEM Equity issues for more than 15 years. Dr. Litzler is a member of ASEE, incoming chair of the ASEE Committee on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and a former board member of the Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN). Her research interests include the educational cli- mate for students, faculty, and staff in science and engineering, assets based approaches to STEM equity, and gender and race stratification in education and the workforce.Dr. Jeremi S London, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Jeremi London is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department at
development of these courses,along with feedback from the first graduating class, current students, and industry.IntroductionThe decline in enrolments in power engineering courses is well documented. Even amonguniversities with well-established electrical power engineering programs, the percentage ofcurricula requiring a course in energy conversion has declined1. At the Milwaukee School ofEngineering (MSOE), elective courses in power systems did not run last year due to a lack ofstudent interest.The demand for students with an interest in power systems has been strong as of late. In thebuilding electrical arena, this need was apparent when a group of 25 local design firms andcontractors approached MSOE and requested a design sequence to address a
- ing design thinking on the secondary level. Nathan was a former middle and high school technology educator in Montana prior to pursuing a doctoral degree. He was a National Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE) Fellow at Utah State University while pursuing a Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction. After graduation he completed a one year appointment with the Center as a postdoctoral researcher.Dr. Hugh Jack P.E., Western Carolina University Not an author. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Taking Soft Robotics from the Laboratory to the ClassroomAbstractSoft robots are an emerging technology which causes us to rethink the design and fabrication ofrobots
Midwest that combines an emphasis on teaching with emerging innovations in research, serving a regional student population. This institution offers over ten undergraduate degrees in engineering and computer science. Class sizes typically average 25 students, with upper division classes averaging about 15 students.• Women’s (Masters L): A small women’s college of approximately 1,792 undergraduates in the Northeast with fifty majors, including computer science, biology, biochemistry, bio- statistics, chemistry, environmental science, health informatics, mathematics, and physics degrees in STEM, but no engineering degrees. This institution offers a liberal arts education for its undergraduates integrated with professional work
other colleges and universities. In previous years, students have actively participated in regional and national competitions at the conferences hosted by ASEE, ASME, IEEE, SEM (the Society for Experimental Mechanics) and LACCEI (the Latin American and Caribbean Consortium of Engineering Institutions), respectively.CONCLUSIONSThis project has established an educational pathway to educate PRA technicians for the serviceindustry. The program collaborated with service industry collaborators to develop a curriculum,ensuring that graduates can seamlessly transition to the workforce. Professional developmentinitiatives enhance faculty capabilities, ensuring the delivery of up-to-date PRA technicians.Collaboration with industry partners
University-Corpus Christi’s Computer Science Advisory Board havecommented on the need for graduates to have strong skills in systems analysis and design, which meansusing software engineering CASE tools. However, maintaining a curriculum in line with employerneeds that requires industry tools can be an expensive process13.Shared Software Infrastructure ProjectThe Open Standards SSI Hub Project at Texas A&M University15 alleviates the expense of incorporatingadditional material into the curriculum. At no cost to participating universities, SSI Hub suppliesresources that facilitate the task of empowering students with the experience of using industry tools todevelop cutting edge industrial strength software, while still educating students in
Professional Engineer (P.E.). Thus, the initialaction for continuing students is an informative mentoring stage with the intent to focus theirattentions on the career options without overwhelming them with what they might think areimpossible hurdles like the Graduate Record Examine (GRE) or the P.E. Fundamentals inEngineering (FE) exam.The Daytona State College’s B.S. engineering technology degree program has structured itsjunior and senior years to minimize A.S. graduates’ issues. An early consideration for studentsand an element in the program design is the FE exam. A curriculum to meet the needs of Floridaindustry and to prepare students for the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam in an efficientperiod, are primary considerations of the
setupmodules of sensors, control and communication units, and integrate the modules into a humandrivable car and model vehicles, and develop on-road control strategies and algorithms for self-driving testing. The lane keeping system is one step of the curriculum development, coveringLevel 1 and Level 2 vehicle automation.In general, lane keeping systems use a video camera to detect road features such as lane markers,and calculate lateral vehicle position, velocity, and lane width in-respect to the lane lines3. Thismethod allows the use of existing infrastructure and is easily adaptable to road changes such asconstruction. However, optical systems are prone to failure in conditions where road features donot exist or are obscured by low sun angles
2006-446: OUTCOME ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATIONKenneth Stier, Illinois State University Dr. Ken Stier is a professor and Coordinator of the Integrated Manufacturing Systems Program at Illinois State University. He received his Ed.D in Curriculum and Instruction and has been responsible for coordinating the assessment plan for the Manufacturing Systems Program for the last three years. He has served in various capacities on six accreditation site visits. Regular teaching responsibilities include courses in manufacturing processes, materials technology, and manufacturing organization and management.Richard Boser, Illinois State University Dr. Richard Boser is a Professor and Coordinator of the
AC 2010-1680: SPECIAL SESSION: MODEL-ELICITING ACTIVITIES: ACONSTRUCT FOR BETTER UNDERSTANDING STUDENT KNOWLEDGE ANDSKILLSTamara Moore, University of Minnesota Tamara J. Moore is an Assistant Professor of Mathematics/Engineering Education and co-director of the STEM Education Center at the University of Minnesota. Dr. Moore is a former high school mathematics teacher and her research interests are centered on the integration of STEM concepts through contextual problem solving in the mathematics and engineering classroom. She has been developing curricular tools and researching professional development and student learning in this area. Before coming to the University of Minnesota, Dr. Moore
and is considered a fundamental sub-ject in an undergraduate and postgraduate robotics curriculum. Furthermore, project-based learninghas shown significant benefits in engineering domains, specifically in interdisciplinary fields such asrobotics which require hands-on experience to master the discipline adequately. However, designinga project-based learning experience to teach control theory in a hands-on setting can be challenging,due to the rigor of mathematical concepts involved in the subject. Moreover, access to reliable hard-ware required for a robotics control lab, including the robots, sensors, interfaces, and measurementinstruments, may not be feasible in developing countries and even many academic institutions in theUS. The current
programs. Since opportunities for student choice in courses increased motivation3, it isprobable that choice in curriculum will also increase motivation. In spring 2009, 2/3 of thestudents in IDE 301 had transferred into IDES/MDE from another program at the university.Some of these students, particularly those who developed broad interests3, would probably nothave stayed in engineering. Because adding a few students to an existing lecture course hasalmost no additional cost, the major costs are for the two core courses required for the MDEprogram, for the academic advisor, and for the program director – who also teaches in theprogram. By retaining students, these two programs earn much more in tuition than they cost
-ating novel design concepts, proposing innovative solutions, and inspiring new avenues for re-search. Through the integration of Generative AI technologies into engineering curricula, educa-tors can effectively prepare students for the challenges and opportunities of the digital age, em-powering them to succeed in their academic pursuits and beyond 42. Fall 2024 ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference, Farmingdale, New York, USA, October 25-26 Zhang, Z., Chang, Y.4. Implementation and outcomes4.1 Implementation of Generative AI in classesIn the curriculum of four courses—Circuit Analysis and Dynamics for lower-level engineeringstudents, and Electrical Power and Machinery and
paper reports the responses from participants in this unique workshopsession.BackgroundThe emergence of engineering as a school subject is in its infancy. The most importantengineering concepts and skills that students of differing interests and aptitudes shouldmaster are not well defined. State adopted curriculum materials, often the cornerstone of aprofessional development program, are still unavailable. To begin to understand theimportant features of an effective professional development program, NCETE focused itsefforts on engineering design as a content area in high schools. The rationale for thisdecision is that aspects of engineering design are shared by technology design as describedin standard 8 of the Standards for Technological
frontiers of engineering” and “each is associated withincreasing complexity.”3By comparison, the discipline of architecture’s curriculum andpedagogy consciously and actively fosters and rewards creativity. Architecture students prioritizeinnovation and continuously engage in creative thinking while keeping an eye on the big picture:the cultural significance and ultimate aims of the “program” in relationship to the cultural andenvironmental context of the project. Students are exposed to the best examples of creativeendeavor and cutting-edge design practice and taught the history of their field. Throughout theireducation, students are exposed to a range of approaches and methodologies for problem-solvingdesign, helping to provide the understanding
spans business, nursing, medicine, and engineering.This interest then continues as a catalyst for educational reforms. The rest of their work lays afoundation for acceptance or rejection of the current definitions and assessments of emotionalintelligence. In their conclusions, two distinct groups emerge: the first group’s interpretation ofemotional intelligence is strictly parallel to cognitive intelligence and the second group definedEI an all-encompassing value.These distinctions lead to several different definitions of EI. Roberts, in a summary of emotionalintelligence [7], splits EI into two models: Integrative-Model Approaches and Mixed-ModelApproaches to emotional intelligence. The Integrative-Model assessment focuses on specificabilities
explores the nature of global com- petency development by assessing how international experiences improve the global perspectives of en- gineering students. Dr. Streiner has published papers and given presentations in global engineering ed- ucation at several national conferences. Scott is an active member in the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL) both locally and nationally, as well as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE).Dr. Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut Daniel Burkey is the Associate Dean of Undergraduate Programs and Professor-in-Residence in the De- partment of Chemical and Biomolecular
Paper ID #23833Incorporating the Entrepreneurial Mindset into a System Dynamics CourseDr. Louis A. DiBerardino III, Ohio Northern University Dr. DiBerardino is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Ohio Northern University. His teaching and research interests are in first-year engineering, dynamic systems, and musculoskeletal biome- chanics, and integrating curriculum with the entrepreneurial mindset.Dr. Lawrence Funke, Ohio Northern University Dr. Funke received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Notre Dame in 2017. He is currently an assistant professor at Ohio Northern University.Dr
Engineering (COE)wanted to teach eight of 10 courses. With the help of the Provost, a compromise was reachedallowing the COB to teach three of 10 courses while COE taught seven of 10 courses. Therevenue for the three COB courses goes entirely to the COB with all administrative costs coveredby the COE. In addition to the quality of the COB courses, another benefit of having three COBcourses in our engineering management program has been enhanced student enrollments. Ourprospective students are very impressed with the COB courses in our curriculum. I would verystrongly advise others who may be considering the development of an engineering managementprogram to work with their COB early on during the proposal phase to reach a compromiseregarding both
exhibiting for several days. Along the back of the contacts, connect your circuit wires tightly. You should now have an open circuit where connecting the two contact points will result in completion. Your human skin will act as a switch to control the circuit.v Carefully integrate your contact surfaces into the design elements you chose earlier. In Page 26.1119.5 Star Car, the baby alien was created from metallic thread so that just touching his body was enough to connect to the circuit. The rocket ship was decorated with conductive aluminum tape, requiring users to hold the main shuttle. v Once your design has been reinforced
operator theory, as well as academic integrity in international engineering education.Prof. Chengbin Ma, University of Michigan–Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Institute Professor Chengbin Ma received the B.S. degree in industrial automation from East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China, in 1997, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engi- neering from The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, in 2001 and 2004, respectively. From 2004 to 2006, he was an R&D Researcher with the Servo Motor Laboratory, FANUC Limited, Japan. Between 2006 and 2008, he was a Postdoctoral Researcher with the Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engi- neering, University of California, Davis, USA. He
environment.INTRODUCTIONEthics, social responsibility, and trust are critical issues for the built environment fromproduction and professional identity perspectives. These issues have been recognized byowners, manufacturers, designers and constructors through the creation of the codes ofethics/professional conduct and integration of ethics to the professional degree programcurriculums. The codes of ethics/professional conduct are generally defined and enforcedthrough licensing institutions, professional organizations or within individual companies orfirms. The educational need for ethics and social responsibility is also noted in the highereducation system by the revision of educational curriculums through accrediting agencyrequirements. However, in professional degree
Session # 3630 Teaching Teachers to Teach Engineering Baaba Andam, Glenn W. Ellis, Susan Etheredge, Domenico Grasso Smith College, Northampton, MA Thomas Gralinski Amherst Regional High School, Amherst, MAABSTRACTMassachusetts is leading the integration of engineering into K-12 education by adopting astatewide science and technology/engineering framework. To meet the need for teachers whocan deliver this curriculum, we have assembled an interdisciplinary team from Smith Collegeand Amherst Public Schools to design a workshop for pre
challenges in an ever-advancing technological landscape. AcknowledgmentsWe thank the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological andEnvironmental Research program for providing funding through the Research Development andPartnership Pilot (DOE-RDPP grant # DE-SC0023066) to support this endeavor. Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX Copyright 2024, American Society for Engineering Education 11 References[1] C. Fredriksson and J. Galos, "An integrating
categories:discovery, integration, application, and teaching 1. This is the well-known “Boyer’smodel of scholarship.” Since its inception in 1990, Boyer’s model has been widelydiscussed and debated, and the focus has mainly been on its impact on university faculty,especially their tenure, promotion, and reappointment (TPR) policies 2, 3.However, scholarships are not generated by faculty alone. Our students, especiallygraduate students, are an important integral part of the scholarship. They serve as abackbone of pure research (discovery), a vehicle of implementations (integration andapplication), and a bridge between faculty and the students, graduate and undergraduatesalike (teaching). Their efforts of generating and improving the quality of scholarships
) materials are Workshops and Short Courses. The MUG Workshop isdesigned to familiarize the teacher with the structure of the HSTI modules and offer suggestionsfor classroom integration. The Short Courses are the professional development portion of theMUG. They are classroom-based, in-depth training on the technologies associated with thescience presented in the respective module. In the past two years, 180 teachers have acceptedHSTI modules impacting nearly 20,000 students.During the HSTI project, we have used mixed methods of data collection, including onlineteacher surveys regarding the modules, post professional development surveys, student impactprereporting by the teachers, and direct observations. The purpose of our sampling was to createan
who have an interest in math and science and want to explore engineering and its disciplines with the possibility of receiving college credit from JHU. As a summer course, the class is an intensive four-week experience where students actively participate in hands-on team activities including laboratory experiments and virtual internet-based simulations while attending college-level lectures related to these activities. Field trips to local companies that employ engineers and informational sessions on college and career choices are also integrated into the course schedule. In short, the curriculum links math, science, and engineering concepts to Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest
computationalapproaches.To maximize student learning, the integration of computation into introductory courses shoulduse tools designed specifically for education. The existing computational MSE initiatives inupper-level courses focus mostly on using computational tools designed for research andindustry to solve problems [5], [6], [7], [9], [10]. The value of this approach is that students learnto use tools they may encounter in professional settings. However, these tools are designed forefficient problem solving and do not usually help students to better understand the underlyingphenomenon being modeled, making them suboptimal for an introductory setting.Here, we describe an introductory MSE course grounded in computational modelling from acomplex systems
, results from the PI mathematics questions were evaluated by subtopicand by class standing for AY 00-01 and AY 01-02. For basic math skills such as algebra, lineand exponential equations, etc., student averages were near 70% in the sophomore level PIs,increasing to 80-90% for the junior and senior level PIs. However, while sophomore level PIsindicated that students could obtain an average of 63% correct in integration or 75% correct intrigonometry, those scores dropped to 42% for both subtopics in the junior and senior level PIs.The conclusion drawn from this data was that OUCE students were given fundamental mathskills in the freshman and sophomore calculus sequence, but they were quickly diminished assubsequent courses did not sufficiently