name that may reflect the type of servicesthey perform, represent an individual or group, or just have a name that will be catchy and dynamic. Thecompany’s name will be used throughout the entire course when sending correspondence and representing theteam. Along with the name, the teams must determine the type of organization they will operate under that maybe a partnership, corporation, or company. All of the firms are located in the same city, but the teams aredirected to establish their home office and branch office addresses and telephone numbers. The teams also arerequired to create a company motto and logo that will be incorporated throughout course. Creativity isencouraged in developing these items.Branch Office’s Organizational
NE distance education provider. Over 12 other NEprograms submitted proposals to KAPL and the UT program was selected for a variety ofreasons including the flexibility of the program (e.g., requiring math, allowing non-NEengineering courses), the retention of a research requirement in the DE program, and theinteractive CyberClass delivery technology.The demand is best shown through recent enrollment figures: the 2001 Fall semester figuresshow that the new distance education programs increased UT nuclear engineering graduatestudent enrollment by 25%. These figures reflect demand for the MS program because theCertificate programs do not officially begin until Fall 2002.5.0 CONCLUSIONS:The University of Tennessee's Nuclear Engineering Department
” laboratory exercises in which the students must fabricate and assemble variousphysical items.III. Reflections on the Design TrilogyStudent numbersSince our first offering of the Design Trilogy in 1998, two groups of students ( » 15 students pergroup) have completed all three courses. Another 60 students have completed a portion of the Page 7.261.5 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ã 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationDesign Trilogy (»15 completed the second and third courses, » 15 completed the first and secondcourses, » 15
tool used to assess the ILB was a student survey given at the end of the semester.The questionnaire was designed to determine if the students felt that they had achieved theshared outcomes and specific outcomes of Principles of Design. The students’ responses reflecttheir opinion of whether the outcomes were achieved, but do not necessarily reflect whether they Page 7.701.5 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationactually achieved the outcomes. Thirty-eight students completed the questionnaire
with the tutorial sheets guiding the student through a structured use of theapplets. These tutorial sheets are highly contrived since they lead the student through a set ofpredetermined tasks using the applet (“I know what I want my students to see!”). However,students are allowed to proceed at their own pace and, every so often, space is left on thetutorial sheet for reflection, e.g. ‘Draw the graph shown on the screen in the space provided’,‘Write here how the graph changed when …’, ‘Why do you think that the graph…?’, ‘Whatwas the equation in this case?’An extract from the ‘Mass / Spring / Damper’ applet’s worksheet is shown in the followingframe. Here, students are guided into discovering for themselves the phenomenon of ‘Beats’.· Use the
), and compensation (lag, lead).Although it may be argued that the course contents possess educational values, it isgenerally agreed that significant revision is necessary to reflect the change intechnologies and modern engineering career challenges. In particular, computer-aidedanalysis, state space methods, and nonlinear systems are introduced into the curriculum,replacing lag, lead compensation, Nichols chart, and parts of the performance criteria.That is, the emphasis of the course is on analysis rather than control design which isrelegated to a second course “EE486 Control Systems Electives”. An outline of thelecture is shown below: · Introduction to Systems, Review of LaPlace Transform · Transfer Functions, Signal Flow Graphs
of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action.3Thus, critical thinking paves the pathway of the creative process. The higher-level thinkingskills are not innate or instantaneous, but must be practiced and honed on a continual basis.Students must realize that this is a life-long learning process that requires discipline of thoughtand cannot be achieved in a moment of inspiration or mastered at any given time. Page 7.541.2
EngineeringTechnology and Surveying Technology degree programs follow the standards of theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) and are accredited by theTechnology Accreditation Commission (TAC). A National Science Foundation (NSF (ILI)) grant Page 7.694.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Expositi on Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationallowed us to change the thrust of the programs to reflect the revolution in civil engineering andsurvey technology caused by advances in electronics, satellite positioning, and computer
functional parts. Reflecting the importance ofteaching the fundamental computer knowledge, engineering accreditation organization ABETcurrently requires all accredited electrical and computer engineering programs to include amicrocontroller/microprocessor course.The two most popular microcontroller modules used in universities are the 68HC11EVB and the68HC11EVBU. The first one is designed to work along with external memory components andadditional ports (expanded mode) while the latter one was developed for embedded applicationswhere a microcontroller contains all necessary resources within the controller (single chip Page 7.863.1mode). At the
aesthetics in engineering design, particularly inthe choice of computer aided tools for signal processing, which is the area I prefer to teachregularly. In that paper, we reflect on the normative principles on the responsible employment oftechnology and espouse the following principles, after Monsma, et al7: cultural appropriateness,openness and communication, stewardship, delightful harmony, justice, caring anddependability. Of these principles, delightful harmony is the norm that deals with aesthetics.Delightful harmony implies that a) the artifact must be effective, or competent; b) it should be“pleasing and satisfying to use;” c) it must promote harmonious relationships7. We then establisha link between aesthetics and “playfulness” which
of a student in terms of specific knowledge, value, andskills at the time of completion of a course. The course learning outcomes should bemapped with program learning outcomes.A typical course assessment processes normally include homework, quizzes, tests, web-based tests, project reports, final examinations, oral presentations, etc. In addition aCourse Assessment Survey by both students and the course instructor(s) should beperformed. The survey questions should focus on accomplishment of objectives andoutcomes in addition to feedback for continuous improvement of quality of a course.The emphasis on assessment by an instructor should include his/her reflection onpedagogical methods used and satisfaction of accomplishing the course
‘ were not used toin determining students’ grades. Rather, its purpose was to enable students to better understandtheir individual strengths and weaknesses as viewed by themselves and their peers (teammates).Results indicated that, in general, all the teams were perceived to function well. (See Table 3.)However, in comparing the results of the Team Developer‘ to the final grade in the course therewas a significant, but weak negative correlation between the peer’s score for a teammate and thefinal grade; suggesting that the more critical ratings teams gave to their fellow members, thebetter the project outcome as reflected by the team grade. However, there may have been animpact on the self and group ratings and the size of the team. Members of
problem solving. In working with technology in engineeringeducation, Mioduser suggested the need for defining an appropriate conceptual frameworksupportive of requisite knowledge, skills and cognitive models for problem solving.9 Thus it willbe important to endeavor to make language supportive of concepts that are critical to problemsolving success and to make sure that the language used reflects the underlying concepts involvedin problem solving in engineering. Suggestions for dealing with the difficulties posed by language usage include thefollowing: § Use correct terminology and urge students to do the same by pointing out to students the difficulties created by poor language concerning problem solving
compartmental fashion has never been fully successful; our architecture curriculumis by its nature integrated and connected. We have found that the most important element in good teaching isinvolving students to enable them to think and learn on their own. However, more importantly, our graduates arefinding a flattering reflection of their active-learning educational experience in the integration-rich workplace.Architecture is a multidisciplinary field of study that draws on many areas of study. Architecture education mustsuccessfully involve the integration of art, engineering, business, and other disciplines.References[1] 2000-2001 University of Hartford Bulletin, ARCHITECTURE Program Course Descriptions.[2] Boyer, E., and Mitgang, L., “Building
buggy go the specified distance and turn 90°; make it drive ina complete square; employ a bump sensor to avoid walls; and employ a light (reflective) sensor tofollow a black line on a white surface. Each challenge has been aligned with national standards(see Table 1) and tested in preservice teacher education courses and with 4th – 6th grade students.All involved parties assess the learning so that modifications for increased efficacy can be made. Asignificant portion of each TWT undergraduate course is a month-long experiential learningproject in a partner school classroom such as the one described. Page 8.494.4 Proceedings of the 2003
. In 1997, the American Society of TestingMaterials (ASTM) approved this new standard named “Standard Test Method for Measuring theP-Wave Speed and the Thickness of Concrete Plates Using the Impact-Echo Method.” Thismethod is based on the laws of elastic stress wave propagation through material. A stress wave isintroduced into the test object by a mechanical impact. The stress wave consists of compression,shear, and surface waves. The reflections of the compression wave are analyzed to detect theinternal flaws in a concrete member. The most important advantage of the impact echo method is that access is required to onlyone side of the member. It can be used to detect voids and honeycombs in walls and slabs,delaminations and internal cracks
aspects. Construction products or assemblies of aconstruction project (e.g., column, footing, slab) form the core to which associations of digitalvideos are made. The associations include the intermediate products (outputs that have not yetbecome end products, e.g., mix) related to the assemblies, and the activities that shaped them.Figure 2 shows examples of how videos about construction products are associated tointermediate products, and some of their related construction activities.In this organization scheme, the digital knowledge about products captures sections of videos ofthe product from different views. The knowledge about construction activities contains sectionsof videos, which reflect construction changes with time. The set of
complexity.Although private owners feel strongly about one of the six factors, all factors scored at least onetime as the most important one in priority ranking. Thus for any particular project, any one of thefactors can be the most important reason for choosing Design-Build delivery. Therefore, ingeneral, private sector’s overpowering consideration for choosing Design-Build is to shortenproject duration. Next most important consideration for the owners is the single point ofresponsibility in the Design-Build delivery. In addition, there are other reasons for choosingDesign-Build such as better Constructability and handle over cost and claims.The importance of shorten duration, over the rest of the factors, is adequately reflected in thefrequency histograms
), the SR-30 was offered in two versions: a thrustdemonstration unit with minimal instrumentation, or as a version with more completeinstrumentation connected to a PC via a DAS board. The latter unit was deemed as the moreappropriate one, for a “turn-key” operation was likely to be more cost effective than a unitneeding additional on-site work for enabling cycle analysis.The installation and site preparation aspects that follow are site-specific. Consequently, theinformation is not universal, but it offers sufficient generality to warrant a summary presentation.The insightful reader may want to keep in mind that a few years of experience developingteaching stands enables a perspective that the following lines attempt to reflect. The unit
a significant amount of learning had occurred. To improve upon the precision of ourresearch design we used the so-called wait-listed control method where each of the two classeswere given a pre-test at the same time, and a post-mini-lab test following the mini-lab experienceof only one of the classes. The other class then conducted the mini-lab, and again, both classeswere tested with a similar quiz. We feel that the difficulties we encountered during the firstimplementation, and the fact that the students were rushed to obtain a fairly large amount of datain a short time contributed to a negative experience for the students. Their negative opinionswere reflected in the survey given following the mini-lab project. We believe that the
vehicle and payload across the track, and forpreliminary estimates of potential vehicle mass and approximate completion time. A moredetailed model was then developed which incorporated multiple steps, thus moreaccurately reflecting the actual track contour, as shown in equation (1): ( Vi + Vw) 2 + ( Vi+1 + Vw) 2 1 2 2 ⋅m⋅ ( Vi+1) − ( Vi) + We⋅tan θ ⋅∆S + µ ⋅We⋅∆S + ⋅A⋅Cd ( ) 1 2⋅∆S 2 2 2 0
on the keywords requirement of thecourse contents. This new method was implemented in the Fall 2001. This teaching methodensures the teaching quality. It also provides guideline for instructor to evaluate student expectedlearning outcome. As indicated in Figure 1(a), in the fall of 2001, class attendance for the C-averaged student was poor, as a result, their homework performance were poor simply becausehomework reflects and re-iterate contents of the classroom teaching. Realized that, instructor hasscheduled extra study session. It was shown in Figure 1(c) that the C averaged students examperformance was not dropping significantly. In the year 2002, class attendance was reinforced(Figure 1(a)), homework performance was improved (Figure 1(b
, anti- aliasing, volume shadows, bump mapping, motion blur, transparency, reflections, and 3D textures. This can make construction simulations closer to the real world and allow computer graphics become meaningful application in the construction industry. • Compatibility on every platform: since OpenGL is fully platform independent, the application can be easily communicated among Windows, Unix, Linux, and MacOS. This means all sizes of construction companies can use the same software with their own system.An OpenGL project is the combination of C++, OpenGL, and basic computer graphics concepts.The OpenGL Utility Library (GLU) provides many of the modeling features, such
courses will be centered around selected model engines (one per semester). This retains the realism of producing a functional product while using less expensive yet robust machines. Although a change in focus from the model Learning Factory, it is appropriate for the targeted student body. 3. The working student population we serve provides inherent collaboration with industry. This is reflected in many of the projects student undertake in their ET4999 Senior Project course. Upgrading our laboratories will allow students to undertake more of those real life projects. 4. Because our programs are already practice, all activities will be integrated into existing courses, no
differentanswers coded in different colors, students vote for a particular answer by raising a colored card.When many students vote for the wrong answer, we invite them to argue the question with oneanother; this usually elicits rather vigorous discussion. In some cases, students are alsoencouraged to reflect on the question by manipulating the object. Students then vote again andany remaining discrepancies are discussed. This process stimulates students to think and arguewith each other in class. Between the manipulation of objects, the verbal exchange and theeventually translation to symbolic representations, these methods can appeal to students with avariety of learning styles [5] and enable more students to succeed
coursecontent, student learning, and coordination of content between courses. Toward this end, theresponsibilities of the committees are: 1. To specify the assessment instruments for the course. 2. To specify the performance targets for assessing the outcomes for the course learning objectives. 3. To determine if the course syllabus was covered. 4. To determine if the course design content was met. 5. To evaluate the data from the assessment instruments to determine if the course outcomes have been met. 6. To specify the minimum course learning objectives. These objectives should reflect the desired design content of the course. Additional objectives may be added at the discretion of an individual faculty member teaching
2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Copyright© 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationWhile there was a reasonable response rate for the survey, the sample size of actual participants inthe GE-FFF program was very small. Because of this, no clear conclusion could be drawn aboutthe reasons behind the apparent lack of success of the GE-FFF program. Upon reflection, thisseems reasonable, given the nature of the first survey, which asked a relatively small number ofpeople about the reasons they did not follow a particular life path. Given the almost limitlesscareer possibilities for recent graduates, asking a small number why they did not choose a specificcareer
two-semester course sequence in datacommunications has been initiated. Its primary feature is the systematic development of networkcommunication channel, device, and service topics within the context of the Ethernet basedIntranet and Internet. This reflects a convergence between services and technologies nowoccurring in the data communication industry9. The coursework allows for introduction of bothfundamental data communication material and crucial network/services topics. Possiblevariations in course content are discussed, and important new material based on industrialnetwork protocols are delineated. Finally, the challenges of laboratory and lecture instruction are
experience has allowedme to see issues from a broader perspective. Seeing how the rest of the world lives has also lead Page 8.49.6 “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”me to reevaluate my priorities. Finally the time away gave me time for reflection. I had notwatched as many sunsets in my entire life as I saw in my year in Namibia.ReferencesJEFFREY J GIESEYJeffrey J Giesey is an Associate Professor in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at OhioUniversity.1 US Department of
of faculty per discipline. Thehigh cost of science journal titles and the lower usage statistics and student enrollment in thesciences, relative to other disciplines, apparently did not adequately reflect science collectionneeds in the formula. The result was the loss of more than half of the science journalcollection. In 1992 Julie Hurd used citation analysis to gather information regardinginterdisciplinary research published by scientists in the University of Illinois at ChicagoChemistry Department. Hurd's research results showed that "less than 60 percent of thesample articles authored by chemistry department faculty were published in journals thatUlrich's [International Periodicals Directory] classifies as chemistry." (Hurd, p