college teaching not improve? From Plato’s academy ofthe fifth century B.C. to the research university of today, professors have taught much thesame way, with indifferent results. A few students learn very well, many learn a little,and a few nothing at all. Page 12.867.2What is a better idea? Try learning. Learning is something students do. It requirescompelling problems and well-designed laboratories, studios, workshops, and playingspaces. It demands strenuous efforts and experts to intercede with stories, admonitions,or principles when students fail, as they must, if they are to learn. Most of the learningthat results in the expertise of the practicing
school teachers connecting math, science and engineering.Amaneh Tasooji, Arizona State University Amaneh Tasooji is an Associate Research Professor in the School of Materials at ASU and has been teaching and developing new content for materials science and engineering classes and laboratories. She has developed new content and contextual teaching methods from here experience as a researcher and a manager at Honeywell Inc. She is currently working to develop new assessments to to reveal and address student misconceptions in introductory materials engineering classes. Page 12.540.1© American Society
University. Dr. Smith’s work experience includes being a contract employee at AT&T Bell Lab- oratories, performing surveying work for the Jackson Electric Membership Corporation, and summer internships at the Atlanta Gas Light Company and Sandia National Laboratories. In addition to Georgia Southern, he has taught at Texas A&M, Prairie View A&M and Tuskegee Universities. His research inter- ests include fuzzy logic, control system design and intelligent systems. He is a member of ASME, ACM, ASEE, Tau Beta Pi and Pi Tau Sigma. Page 23.531.1 c American Society for Engineering
tenure she created Energy Clubs for students in grades 3-5. Albers is passionate about experiential learning and strongly encourages the inclusion of hands-on activities into a curriculum. Her dissertation spans the Colleges of Engineering and Education and quantifies the effects of hands-on activities in an engineering lecture.Dr. Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University Dr. Laura Bottomley received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering in 1984 and an M.S. in Electrical Engi- neering in 1985 from Virginia Tech. She received her Ph D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from North Carolina State University in 1992. Dr. Bottomley worked at AT&T Bell Laboratories as a member of technical staff in Transmission
level to mostly primary cosmic rays near balloon-float altitudes. Additionally, this project intended to study how the intensity of cosmic rays changeswith altitude, based on measurements of cosmic ray intensity from multiple arrival directions,providing a more complete picture of the high‐altitude radiation environment caused by cosmicrays.To achieve the project goal, a payload integrating various subsystems for cosmic-ray detection andevent processing has been designed in a top-down design approach: initially establishingengineering requirements of the payload for the experiment, carrying out functionaldecomposition, and actual laboratory design of subsystems by student team members from the
Paper ID #6148How to Write a Textbook in Ten Easy StepsDr. Barry Dupen, Indiana University Purdue University, Fort Wayne Dr. Dupen is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology at Indiana University Purdue University Fort Wayne (IPFW). He has nine years’ experience as a metallurgist, materials engineer, and materials laboratory manager in the automotive industry. His primary interests lie in materials engineer- ing, mechanics, and engineering technology education. He is also an experienced contra dance caller
around the nation areincorporating sustainability into their curriculum.The National Research Council (NRC) notes several challenges to effective undergraduateeducation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. Thesechallenges include providing engaging laboratory, classroom and field experiences; teachinglarge numbers of students from diverse backgrounds; improving assessment of learningoutcomes; and informing science faculty about research on effective teaching3-5. Researchsuggests that team based projects can also enhance student learning in STEM fields since itpromotes active and collaborative learning while simultaneously promotes individualaccountability, personal responsibility, and communication skills2. In
shorteningthe length to cover only the two days of the competition. In the case of USMA, the trip is fullysponsored by our international office at no cost to the students or academic department.In 2011, one very interesting collaborative opportunity our students came across was with theIntelligent Control Laboratory at Peking University. Several Chinese graduate students had beenworking on building and controlling robotic fish. Our students were very excited about theproject and had a great deal of discussions with the Chinese students about the mechanics,controls, communications, and image processing involved in the project. We learned that theunderwater robot platform developed at Peking University has been used for robotic fishcompetitions annually
Systems and Control” courseThis is a senior level course for Mechanical Engineering which introduces students to modelingand design of closed-loop control systems. The textbook used is “Modern Control Systems”, 12thedition, by Dorf and Bishop. Many Mechanical Engineering students find fundamental conceptssuch as closed-loop control systems and transfer functions as very abstract and difficult to grasp.The extensive mathematical derivations required are somewhat alleviated by the use of Matlaband Simulink throughout the course. As the course does not have a laboratory component there isa gap between theoretical concepts and practical applications in the class. The LEGO basedmodules were developed to bridge this gap at least partially. The first
Academies Press, 2005. [7] J. Narum. Promising practices in undergraduate stem education. In Evidence on Promising Practices in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education Workshops. Washington DC, 2008. accessed 7 January 2010. Page 23.753.12 [8] Natalya Noy and Deborah McGuinness. Ontology 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. Technical report, Stanford University Knowledge Systems Laboratory, March 2001. online, accessed 6 January 2013. [9] National Mathematics Taxonomy Committee. Core subject taxonomy for mathematical sciences education. Technical report, http://people.uncw.edu
workers while installing the system, and the safety of all others who may come in contact with the system after it is installed. B. ELMT 1372. Applications of PV Systems. Course outcome: 1. The student will be able to understand, install, and test the systems in the laboratory provided by the instructor. C. ELMT 1373. Solar PV Systems. Course outcome: 1. Understand and describe the safety of the workers while installing the system and the safety of all others who may come in contact with the system after it is installed. D. HART 1311. Solar Fundamentals. Course outcomes: 1. Demonstrate safe and proper work habits. 2. Categorize heat
answer. However, they doless well when learning is required to be tacit; enacted as skill; context-specific; and thereforedifficult to articulate1. The professors wanted to create an opportunity where students couldcome together in a learning environment that was more like a working studio or laboratory than atypical classroom.The Multidisciplinary Learning and Team Teaching Initiative (MLTT) from the Office of theProvost funded all of the design-build-test activities. In launching this initiative, the Universityof Michigan dedicated $2.5 million dollars to support fourteen team-teaching efforts and cross-disciplinary degree programs at the undergraduate level, 2005-2009. In launching the initiative,the University of Michigan asserted that
course, people are prone to ethical errors when theydeplete self-restraint resources (e.g., when people focus on a difficult task for several hourswithout a break, their ability to make correct ethical judgments is compromised). As we know,many students (and professionals) sometimes work late into the night in order to meet deadlines.If students recognize when they are entering or are in situations that deplete self-restraintresources – say working late in the laboratory, becoming hungry and sleep deprived – they cando what is necessary to rejuvenate themselves, or, failing that become cautious and move tolevel-2 thinking when making ethical choices in situations in which self-restraint resources aredepleted. More generally, we provide
students into chemical engineering over chemistry.Some marginal effects were identified for students majoring in chemistry in terms of scienceclassroom practice. They more often worked on labs and projects, were given the conceptsbefore equations, and worked on small group activities (all p<0.05). These students also had astronger desire to be an expert in a single field (p<0.01) and were less rigid than their chemicalengineering counterparts in their attitudes (p<0.05). Chemistry students' confidence in a scienceclassroom or laboratory may explain why some students who would succeed in chemicalengineering choose chemistry as their major.Chemical engineering students showed a significantly higher interest and confidence in theirphysics
into a construction management postgraduate coursework program in the Australian environment, proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, paper AC 2007-1562.9. F.S. Gunnerson, R.T. Jacobsen and G. Pillay, A strategic alliance between regional universities and industry at a national laboratory, proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 3895-3903.10. J.V. Farr and D. Verma, Involving industry in the design of courses, programs, and a systems engineering and engineering management department, proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
information ismissing. None of these are easily developed in a traditional classroom.We therefore included an additional objective, which is to develop a skill that is often desired ofstudents but the development of which is not supported by lecture or laboratory formats: 4. Explaining, defending, and forming positions on technical matters via oral argument. Page 24.38.2We used the Socratic method enhanced by online assessment and discussion tools to meet theseseemingly disparate objectives.Course structureThere were no lectures; rather, instruction relied entirely on preparation according to a case studygiven to students, and subsequent
Page 24.47.7 6 Lecture from a Single Instructor Based on the data collected from student feedback, changes were made to the courseformat that included more of the learning formats that would better help them gain a betterunderstanding of both engineering majors and engineering careers.Fall 2012 The course format was changed for the second academic year based on student feedback.Because students listed hands-on activities, tours of research laboratories and classroomdiscussion as the top learning strategies, they were incorporated into the class. The class formatwas redesigned to focus on the grand challenges and include a final conceptual design project atthe end of the semester. At specific
associate at the Electromagnetics Laboratory in the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He was an assistant professor with the Department of Elec- trical Engineering, the University of Texas at Arlington from 2005 to 2012. He joined the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, West Virginia University Institute of Technology as an assistant professor in 2012. His current research interests include wireless power transmission, radar systems, mi- crowave remote sensing, antenna design, and computational electromagnetics. He was the recipient of the first prize award in the student paper competition of the IEEE International Antennas and Propagation Symposium, Boston, MA in 2001. He served as the chair of
attitude development in introductory computer science. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE ’13, 2013.11 Eric Drever. Using Semi-Structured Interviews in Small-Scale Research. A Teacher’s Guide. ERIC, 1995.12 Heidi Fencl and Karen Scheel. Engaging students: An examination of the effects of teaching strategies on self-efficacy and course climate in a nonmajors physics course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(1):20, 2005.13 Jack R Fraenkel and Norman E Wallen. How to design and evaluate research in education.14 John M. D. Hill, Curtis A. Carver, Jr., Jeffrey W. Humphries, and Udo W. Pooch. Using an isolated network laboratory to teach advanced networks and security. In Proceedings
. Most commonly, this is accomplished through assessment of somecourse-related activity including homework assignments, exams, laboratories, and projects.However, some of the learning outcomes are not easy to assess in a typical classroom setting. Inparticular, professional skills and their related outcomes are the most challenging to assess, likestudent learning outcome „f‟ which states that by the time a student graduates, they must have anunderstanding of the professional and ethical responsibility.[1] Multiple challenges have beenreported in the literature regarding educating students, and assessing the mastery level of thisparticular outcome.[2, 3] Some of these challenges are common to all engineering programs,including limitations to
.!! Page 24.105.10!References!1. E. Davis, D. Petish, J. Smithey, “Challenges New Science Teachers Face,” Review of Educational Research, 76, 2005, pp. 607-651.2. NJ Department of Education, Core Curriculum Content Standards, http://www.state.nj.us/education/cccs/3. Bernie Trilling & Charles Fadel, “21st Century Skills - Learning for Life in our Times,” Wiley, 2009.4. Eric Westervelt, “To Make Science Real, Kids Want More Fun,” National Public Radio, Morning Edition, http:// www.npr.org/2013/12/17/251675532/to-make-science-real-kids-want-more-fun-and-fewer-facts5. T. Jong, M. Linn, and Z. Zacharia, “Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education,” Science, 340, 2013, pp. 305-308.6. TeachEngineering, Providing
classroom projects and assessments for students and teachers that will spur studentstoward meeting their creative potential. Creativity was shown to be a successful studentoutcome of the game art and design project, and the Consensual Assessment Technique showspromise as a method for measuring creativity in technology education laboratory activities aswell as the integrated STEM learning environment.References 1. Todd, S. M., & Shinzato, S. (1999). Thinking for the future: Developing higher-level thinking and creativity for students in Japan--and elsewhere. Childhood Education, 75(6), 342-45. 2. Lewis, T. (2009). Creativity in technology education: providing children with glimpses of their creative potential. International
Clarkson physics student DaeganGonyer, now an MS student in Engineering Science.Student teams raised Phase I and Phase II fundingfor the project in 2009 and 2010 from the EPAthrough their People, Prosperity and the Planet (P3)student design competition for sustainability. Theyalso conducted laboratory and feasibility studies anddid all of the design, construction and operationaspects of the greenhouse and its systems. Page 23.293.3 Figure 2: Aeroponic system concept (top) and actual system (bottom
different formsof involvement by the employer constituents, including course projects, senior capstoneexperiences/projects, and advisory boards. These directly address ABET‟s criteria that studentsare prepared for engineering practice through a curriculum incorporating appropriate engineeringstandards and multiple realistic constraints[2].IntroductionDemonstration that graduates of an engineering program have met the student learning outcomesa-k is required to be compliant with ABET expectations for accreditation. There are many waysthat the learning outcomes can be demonstrated, and most commonly is accomplished throughassessment of some course-related activity including homework assignments, exams,laboratories, and projects. Some of the learning
. 2. Prince. M. (2004). “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Engineering Education: 93(3) 223-31. 3. Berret, D. (2012). “How Flipping the Lecture Can Improve the Traditional Lecture.” The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/How-Flipping-the-Classroom/130857/. 4. Mazur, E. (2009). "Confessions of a Converted Lecturer: Eric Mazur." Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwslBPj8GgI. 5. Berger, C., N. Kerner, et al. (1999). “Understanding Student Perceptions of Collaboration, Laboratory and Inquiry Use in Introductory Chemistry.” Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston MA
ofaccomplishment and empowerment.Augmented Reality (AR) enables virtual objects to be embedded into the physical world in realtime, and its applications are almost limitless. In the past, this technology has been confined tospecialized laboratories, primarily because the equipment necessary to support these kinds ofenvironments was prohibitively expensive. In addition, developing meaningful AR applicationsrequired a broad, yet deep, set of computing skills. As such, initial experimentation was reservedexclusively for advanced graduate research. Similar to other paradigms, these constraints arebeing removed, providing educators an opportunity to introduce AR at the undergraduate level.AR environments encompass many educational approaches that have been
; Page 23.490.3leadership/development grants; laboratory remodeling). In addition to these efforts and 2 accomplishments, the project has directed outreach efforts toward developing and enhancingrelationships with our Native American tribal partners and, most recently, has initiated a focuson women with disabilities.Theoretical and empirical frameworks for men as gender equity allies In a recent essay reflecting on 30 years of theorizing and researching genderedsubstructures enacted in organizations, Joan Aker2 asserts that “a number of issues about howto think about gender inequalities remain unresolved” (p.214). Research over the past
examinations, fraud resulting from people other than enrolledstudents sitting for exams, accreditation and certification, the counting of MOOC’stoward engineering degree program fulfillment at universities that do not originate thecourses, and a reported gulf between student enrollment in MOOC’s and the number whoactually successfully complete them.ABET is beginning discussions about the accreditation of on-line degree programs.Specifically, if it is possible for students to earn a B.S. degree in engineering on-line,possibly without ever setting foot on a campus, how can the EAC of ABET assess suchprograms to ensure that the basic and program criteria are met that would warrantaccreditation? And, how can on-line students obtain the laboratory
undergraduate engineering course enrolled by junior level students in theMechanical Engineering Technology Department at the University of Pittsburgh Johnstown (UPJ). It is a3-credit course held each fall semester followed by a 1-credit laboratory during the following spring Page 23.56.2semester. When the author taught this course using a traditional lecture approach, it was noticed thatstudents were very focused on memorizing materials science information. The students were moreinterested in knowing how to solve a problem rather than understanding the problem and the concepts. Inaddition, there was a lack of excitement and student-centered
aspect of the graduate students.The other role of the student support staff, which was not planned but just as important, was inessence to act as camp counselors. The student support staff was in direct contact with thestudents for more than 9 hours a day. Through this second role the students support staff wereable to witness the camp fulfilling the goal and objectives of the program.The Surveying Course Objectives, Content and ScheduleThe catalog description of the surveying course is: An introduction to basic surveying operations, procedures, and equipment required for building construction site organization, layout, alignment, and dimension control. Laboratory topics include: surveying fieldwork, leveling instruments