laboratories indicated graphical rating scales were used by avast majority [19].A report by Murphy indicated a criticism of graphical ratings is the tendency of managers toassign a uniform rating. Murphy’s report studied Merck & Co, Inc. from 1978 through 1989.Merck managers assigned a rating from 1, poor, to 5, best, based on overall performance. Forappraisals during 1984 and 1985, 97.76% of the employees received a 3 or 4 appraisal rating[20]. The Cornell University researchers found 77% of their respondents’ professionalemployees rated at the comparable 3 or 4 level [14].Another shortcoming of the graphical rating is its inherent relia nce on the rater’s subjectiveanalysis of the work performance behaviors observed and their translation to the
Session 2793In addition, the set of relationships between cognitive processing and online process measuressuggest a potential profile of participants. Successful participants engaged in proportionally morescientific reasoning than less successful participants. In general, successful participants relied onmore laboratory/data tests and less on resource materials (i.e., experts, library, dictionary).Further, successful participants exhibited less confusion and had less of a need to fill gaps intheir knowledge. In contrast, less successful participants misinterpreted information, wereconfused, and were unsuccessful at eliminating parents even though the tests they were usingcould have eliminated a parent
with progressively greater emphasison constructivism.Advantages Of Activity-Based Learning Versus Lecture-Based TeachingOne key concept in educational improvement is that there should be more emphasis on studentlearning as opposed to the process of teaching. Research such as that reported above indicatesthat students learn best in situations in which they are actively engaged in the learning process.Furthermore, particularly in engineering technology programs, students are expected to be ableto perform useful tasks immediately upon completion of the program. There is an emphasis onwhat students can do in addition to what they know. They are expected to critically analyzeproblems and generate appropriate solutions with minimal supervision
University laboratories and classrooms tosolve real-world problems. This is done through a flexible five-week program where participantsspend two weeks on campus taking classes and preparing for the trip abroad and three weeksworking abroad alongside an international community partner. Since 2007, the program hasworked with communities in over 20 countries worldwide with several hundreds of studentparticipants to date.The purpose of this study is to evaluate overall experiences of students participating in the MOMprogram at Mercer University. As a unique programmatic model for international service-learning in a short-term study abroad context, the MOM program can provide valuable insightsinto effective practices in international service-learning
provide research and engineering opportunities to at least five undergraduate students per year on average 3. (Achievable) To improve and sustain a framework for NASA mission-related laboratory experiments and project formulation for undergraduate student research 4. (Realistic) To complete the proposed projects within the project budget, with funds already secured from an external sponsor and other internal funds available to the team 5. (Time-bound) To demonstrate project outcomes by the end of AY 2023-2024 Our project team consisted of student members from freshmen through junior as of spring2023. Students participated in project lab activities regularly for 5~10 hours/week, depending ontheir time availability
AC 2011-2836: LOOSE NETWORKS AND THE COMMUNITY OF ENGI-NEERING EDUCATION RESEARCH: A DEFINITION BY BIBLIOMET-RIC STANDARDSJohannes Strobel, Purdue University, West Lafayette Johannes Strobel is Director of INSPIRE, Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning and As- sistant Professor of Engineering Education & Educational Technology at Purdue University. After study- ing philosophy, religious studies and information science at three universities in Germany, he received his M.Ed. and Ph.D. (2004) in Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, USA. NSF, SSHRC, FQRSC, and several private foundations fund his research. His research and teaching focuses on the intersection between
AC 2011-668: THE CIVIL ENGINEERING BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ANDACCREDITATION CRITERIA: A PLAN FOR LONG-TERM MANAGE-MENT OF CHANGEStephen J. Ressler, U.S. Military Academy Colonel Stephen Ressler is Professor and Head of the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the U.S. Military Academy (USMA) at West Point. He earned a B.S. degree from USMA in 1979, a Master of Science in Civil Engineering degree from Lehigh University in 1989, and a Ph.D. from Lehigh in 1991. An active duty Army officer, he has served in a variety of military engineering assignments around the world. He has been a member of the USMA faculty for 18 years, teaching courses in engi- neering mechanics, structural engineering, construction, and CE
in several diversity outreach programs. In August 2009 LCDR Fleischmann became a member of the Permanent Commission Teaching Staff and is currently working towards her PhD in Environmental Engineering at the University of Connecticut. She holds a professional engineering license in the state of Florida and a certification as a Certified Sustainable Building Advisor through the National Sustainable Building Advisors Program. Page 22.1222.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Two-Year and Four-Year PartnershipsAbstract Colleges of
education, although many will also likely completegraduate programs at Peking University. Many of the faculty members have received theireducation or significant experience in the United States. For example, Dean Chen taught in theU.S. for many years and served as a major research manager at Johns Hopkins University inBaltimore, MD. Peking University is not a "typical" Chinese university and it is working to be more likethose in the U.S. They are trying to emulate Stanford and MIT with emphasis onentrepreneurship and a strong focus on teaching. They have the most Ministry of Science(similar to the U.S. Department of Energy) technology grants and a research center withcontinuing funding. Regarding globalization, they collaborate with the
, Lockheed and others soon followed. To better understandindustry needs, Terman would take the trouble to contact chief engineers of importantelectronics companies to find out which device or design approach was widely used.These were the design approaches he focused on in his teaching, research, journalpublications, and textbook publications (his electronics texts were at one time thesecond most valuable book property of the McGraw-Hill Book Company, being exceededin popularity only by a standard treatise of engineering drawing). A former student andprotégé of Terman’s, Professor Oswald Villard of the Stanford School of Engineeringrecalled:” Along with enormous energy, Terman always had a clear idea of what hewanted to do and what to do to meet his
Paper ID #8559Microdynamics versus Macrodynamics – An Interdisciplinary Student ProjectDr. Gunter Bischof, Joanneum University of Applied SciencesMs. Annette Casey B.A., University of Applied Sciences FH JOANNEUM, Graz, Austria Annette Casey is a faculty member of the Institute of Automotive Engineering at the University of Ap- plied Sciences FH JOANNEUM, Graz, where she has been teaching undergraduate English for Specific Purposes (ESP) courses for the past fifteen years. After graduating from Dublin City University with a B.A. (Hons.) in Applied Languages, she taught at several schools in Austria, before taking up a three
disaster. In the Appendix, co-author Hansen20 giveshis comments on the books written about Challenger prior to that time, in particular noting theauthors of Power to Explore17 take a revisionist approach, attempting to exonerate MarshallSpace Flight Center from some of the blame for the Challenger launch decision.Bibliography1. Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) Report. (2003) Government Printing Office.http://www.nasa.gov/columbia/caib/html/start.html2. Brocato, J. (2009) Two Ways of Using Case Studies to Teach Ethics. Proceedings of the 2000 ASEEConference. AC 2009-1565.3. Evers, C.T. (2011) A Case Study-based Graduate Course in Engineering Ethics and Professional Responsibility.Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference. AC 2011
as follows: The deformation and wave propagation should be uniform and uniaxial so that the strain rate and compressive stress wave could be determined accurately based on the technique introduced by Kolsky. The maximum strain rate of 5000 should be attained by the apparatus.The design constraints are as follows: Due to limitation of the laboratory space, the apparatus size should be limited to 2 meters in length. Due to budget limitation, the total cost of the prototype should not exceed $1000.Initial Design:As shown in Figure 2, the major components of a generic Split Hopkinson Pressure Barapparatus are as follows: Nitrogen Tank / Compressor is the pressure source that the striker projectile is provided in
been met. This evidence can include term papers, tests,laboratory reports, homework or other class assignments, presentations given, and letters fromemployers or professors. The ITA is the most significant aspect of ensuring that programoutcomes are achieved by all graduates.The student must satisfactorily address each program outcome by developing appropriatelearning statements and providing supporting evidence. The learning statements for eachprogram outcome are graded on the following scale: 0 – Not Responsive to Outcome (Evidence not provided for relevant courses or experiences. Coursework and other examples not demonstrative of required knowledge. The student will need to improve the learning statement and/or supporting
our collaborativeanalysis: (1) academic trajectory, (2) parental background, and (3) family support. Eachsubsection presents the results via an overview and a selection of interview quotes andfollows this up with a short interpretation from the authors. Following this thematicpresentation, we present two “back-stories,” in more detail, featuring notable experiencesof two participants.Academic trajectoryBefore enrolling in the chemical engineering or biotechnology degree program, nine ofthe eleven participants had completed a Technological Specialization Course (CET) atthe same institution where they now studied. In Portugal, a CET is a short-cycle highereducation program [21] that in this case led to a laboratory technician diploma; it was
Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 144(2), 04017017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000360Cardon, M. S., Gregoire, D. A., Stevens, C. E., & Patel, P. C. (2013). Measuring entrepreneurial passion: Conceptual foundations and scale validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(3), 373–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.03.003Cox, D. (2017). Development of Hands-on Laboratory Resources for Manufacturing Engineering. Annual Conference and Exposition. American Society for Engineering Education.Da Silva, G., De Barros, M., & Costa, H. (2015). Entrepreneurship in Engineering Education: A Literature Review. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(6A), 1701–1710
cleaners had fundamental engineering power management design andimplementation faults (e.g., exposed metal parts, poorly insulated wiring, lack of grounding andsafety features) that literally shocked (electrically) many users. This naturally resulted in a levelof individual and public social distress, which in turn initiated public pressure for safetyimprovement. In response to this, and other alarming public technology product safety concerns,Underwriters Laboratories (UL) an independent agency for product assessment was created. ULprofessional engineers would study a product’s design regarding varied performance qualitieswith specific attention to safety, devised tests, and upon successful assessment, grant the famousUL approval certification
Presidential Award 2023 ASEE 2023: Multidisciplinary Engineering Division’s ’Best Diversity Paper’ Award DSIR 2021: ’Outstanding Paper’ AwardProf. Dita Puspita Sari, Shibaura Institute of Technology I am a condensed matter physics experimentalist with expertise in superconductivity and magnetic materials, particularly organic-based compounds, studied by muon spectroscopy. I am currently an Associate Professor in the Innovative Global Program (IGP) and the Global Course of Engineering and Science (GEneS), Shibaura Institute of Technology, where I teach Physics subjects for undergraduate and graduate courses. My colleagues and I have been conducting the Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) Program for our
Cincinnati, College of Engineering. This survey used the same formatand gathered results for 10 distinct disciplines in the undergraduate program. Canale & Duwartconducted parallel studies at Northeastern University. Results from both sets of studies areconsistent. They indicate that the students’ perceptions of the learning that occurred throughcooperative education has a direct and significant impact on their development in the elevenABET attributes. Within all engineering disciplines surveyed, and without special treatment,cooperative education shows itself to be a strong partner, along with traditional academiccoursework and laboratories, in the development of these attributes in the engineering graduate.The authors propose that colleges who
Engineering Sustainable Systems Program. He is Chief Science Officer of Fusion Coolant Systems. Professor Skerlos has gained national recognition and press for his research and teaching in the fields of technology policy and sustainable design. He has co-founded two successful start-up companies (Accuri Cytometers and Fusion Coolant Systems), co-founded BLUElab, served as Director of the Graduate Pro- gram in Mechanical Engineering (2009-2012), and served as associate and guest editor for four different academic journals. His Ph.D. students in the Environmental and Sustainable Technologies Laboratory have addressed sus- tainability challenges in the fields of systems design, technology selection, manufacturing, and water
- cation with specific emphasis on innovative pedagogical and curricular practices at the intersection with the issues of gender and diversity. With the goal of improving learning opportunities for all students and equipping faculty with the knowledge and skills necessary to create such opportunities, Dr. Zastavker’s re- cent work involves questions pertaining to students’ motivational attitudes and their learning journeys in a variety of educational environments. One of the founding faculty at Olin College, Dr. Zastavker has been engaged in development and implementation of project-based experiences in fields ranging from science to engineering and design to social sciences (e.g., Critical Reflective Writing; Teaching and
Paper ID #31189A Summer Program Focused on Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset intheContext of the NAE Grand Challenges for EngineeringDr. Jared Schoepf, Arizona State University Jared Schoepf is the Director of Operations for Engineering Projects in Community Service (EPICS) at Arizona State University. Jared received his PhD in Chemical Engineering at ASU, developing a tiered approach to rapidly detect nanomaterials in the environment and consumer products. Jared has been a lecturer of EPICS for 6 years, mentoring over 300 teams. Currently he teaches introduction to engineering, EPICS, and chemical engineering courses
,Assimilating, Converging, and Accommodating. Project-based experiential learning ideallyharnesses a student’s natural interest and motivation to navigate an iterative path of evolvingexperiences, each of which enhance learning in different ways. Figure 1: Kolb's Experiential Learning Conceptual ModelImplementation of the experiential learning model is commonly done through project-basedlearning. Blumenfeld et al. defined project-based learning as, “A comprehensive perspectivefocused on teaching by engaging students in investigation.” 23 Within this framework, studentspursue solutions to nontrivial problems by asking and refining questions, debating ideas, makingpredictions, designing plans and/or experiments, collecting and
Paper ID #26015Design and Development of Compressed Air Controller Tire Inflation System(CACTIS) Using a System Engineering Approach and Elements of the KEENFrameworkProf. John M. Santiago Jr, Colorado Technical University Professor John Santiago has been a technical engineer, manager, and executive with more than 26 years of leadership positions in technical program management, acquisition development and operation research support while in the United States Air Force. He currently has over 18 years of teaching experience at the university level and taught over 40 different graduate and undergraduate courses in electrical
Paper ID #37385A Rubric-Based Assessment of Information Literacy in Graduate CourseTerm PapersDr. Bridget M. Smyser, Northeastern University Dr. Smyser is a Teaching Professor in the Mechanical and Industrial Engineering department at North- eastern University.Jodi Bolognese, Northeastern University Jodi Bolognese is the Engineering Librarian at Northeastern University, where she serves as liaison to the College of Engineering. Previously, she worked in product management for STEM learning technologies. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Rubric-Based Assessment of
discuss the implementation and student learning outcomes of the ML course. Ifalternative methods were incorporated in the course (i.e., flipped classroom and project-basedlearning) the article was removed from further analysis. If the course was a Massive Open OnlineCourse (MOOC), if it had online lecture components or if it was a mobile game learning system itwas eliminated from the screening. If data for the study was collected for only part of the semesterthe study was eliminated from the list. If ML was applied to only a portion of a course, for examplea laboratory, the study was removed from the list. If the study was performed on non-humansubjects, like mice, the study was removed. Other criterions used to eliminate articles
data scientist, having worked in both the semiconductor industry as well as several since-acquired startups. His research interests include Secure Distributed Systems, Security and Resilience of Autonomous Systems, Continuous and Adaptive Authentication, Cyber-Physical Systems and Applications, and Hardware-Level Security for Lightweight Agents. He and his students have published over 46 journal and conference publications. He is a senior member of the IEEE, ACM, and IET. His research has been funded (~$6.2M since 2018) by federal, national, state, and industrial entities, including the NSF, NSA, Idaho National Laboratories, State of Wyoming, IOHK and Kraken. © American Society for
engineering degree studies. Extensive surveys ofthe current practices related to senior projects, as well as of engineering teaching through seniorprojects are available in the literature [1, 2]. For their senior projects, students apply thebackground and skills accumulated through coursework in researching a problem, for whichthen a solution is investigated, designed and implemented. A significant part of the knowledgeand skills needed for the projects are straightforward learning from the actual courses taken inthe program, but often new skills are needed, specific to the project topic selected, and studentsneed to apply their learning skills in researching a new subject, or getting familiar with a newpiece of hardware or software platform