Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Work-in-Progress 3: Integration of Math, Computing, and AI in First-Year Courses

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cheryl B. Schrader, Wright State University; Craig Baudendistel, Wright State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FPD)

Paper ID #48536WIP: College-Wide First Year SeminarBuilding the Foundation for CareerSuccessDr. Cheryl B. Schrader, Wright State University Cheryl B. Schrader retired as president and rejoined full-time professor ranks in Wright State’s Department of Electrical Engineering. Prior to Wright State she served as chancellor of Missouri University of Science and Technology and associate vice president for research and dean of engineering at Boise State University. Professor Schrader earned her BSEE degree from Valparaiso University and MSEE and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Notre Dame. Over her career she received

Conference Session

Tech Session 6: Transformative Practices in Evolving Learning Environments

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel B Oerther P.E., Missouri University of Science and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering & Sustainability Division (ENVIRON)

Paper ID #45986Panel on Environmental Engineers Solving Problems of Planetary HealthDr. Daniel B Oerther P.E., Missouri University of Science and Technology Professor Daniel B. Oerther, PhD, PE joined the faculty of the Missouri University of Science and Technology in 2010 as the John A. and Susan Mathes Chair of Civil Engineering after serving for ten years on the faculty of the University of Cincinnati where he was head of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Professor Oerther is internationally recognized for leadership of engineers, sanitarians, and nurses promoting the practice the sustainable

Conference Session

Harnessing AI and Collaborative Platforms to Personalize and Innovate K-12 STEM Curriculum

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jutshi Agarwal, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Siddharthsinh B Jadeja, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Corey T Schimpf, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Carolyn S Giroux, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; A Lynn Stephens

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

graduate students. She also works in the areas of teaming in engineering classrooms and creating instructional tools for engineering in various contexts and educational settings. She has expertise in mixed-methods research designs.Mr. Siddharthsinh B Jadeja, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Siddharthsinh Jadeja is a passionate and driven engineering education graduate research student in the Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo, deeply committed to enhancing engineering education through innovative, human-centric design approaches. With a strong foundation in engineering principles and a keen interest in educational methodologies, Siddharthsinh focuses on integrating design

Conference Session

Faculty Development: Student Engagement

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas Rabb, California State University Los Angeles; Corin L. Bowen, California State University, Los Angeles; Kenya Z. Mejia, San Francisco State University; Silvia Heubach, California State University, Los Angeles; Gustavo B Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles; Michael W. Ibrahim, California State University, Los Angeles; Yilin Feng, California State University, Los Angeles

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

aerospace engineering from the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor in April 2021; her thesis included both technical and educational research. She also holds an M.S.E. in aerospace engineering from the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor and a B.S.E. in civil engineering from Case Western Reserve University, both in the areas of structural engineering and solid mechanics.Kenya Z. Mejia, San Francisco State University Dr. Kenya Z. Mejia is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at San Francisco State University. Her work focuses on diversity and inclusion in engineering education, particularly in engineering design education.Prof. Silvia Heubach, California State University, Los AngelesDr. Gustavo B Menezes

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy B Chan Hilton, University of Southern Indiana; Shelly B. Blunt, University of Southern Indiana; William Elliott, University of Southern Indiana

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Paper ID #49429BOARD # 229: Capacity-Building for Change in an IUSE ICT Project: InstitutionalizingMini-ActivitiesDr. Amy B Chan Hilton, University of Southern Indiana Amy B. Chan Hilton, Ph.D. is the Director of the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning and a Professor of Engineering at the University of Southern Indiana (USI). Her interests include faculty and organizational development to support both faculty and student success, learning analytics, teaching innovations, and systems thinking and storytelling for institutional change.Shelly B. Blunt, University of Southern IndianaWilliam Elliott, University of

Conference Session

Military and Veterans Division (MVD) 1 - Access and Integration

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benjamin Pederson, Air Force Institute of Technology; Mark Reith, Air Force Institute of Technology; David Long, Air Force Institute of Technology; Ralucca A. Gera, Naval Postgraduate School; Edward D White, Air Force Institute of Technology; Jonathan Zemmer, Air Force Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Military and Veterans Division (MVD)

following criteria: a) The subject population includes military members, government civilians, and contractors. b) The researchers make a special effort to recruit subjects within or related to the cyber career field. c) The researchers may recruit people with cyber experience from non-DoD organizations based on availability. The recruitment locations are military organizations. The participants are recruited throughemail and in-person contact. Participants agree to be part of the experiment, and a meeting isarranged. The experiment occurs over Microsoft Teams, using Teams’ recording transcriptfeature for the interview. After the experiment begins, the protocol in Figure 2 is followed:Figure 2. Experiment protocol, showing the

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Human-Centered Engineering

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachana Ashok Gupta, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Jeremy Edmondson, North Carolina State University at Raleigh

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

requirements and usability. The Android app screen shown in the PCD creates a visual representation of the user actions explained in the UOF. FBD clearly explains how functionality will be divided between the Android app and the PCB and high-level technical solutions on how the system will interact with the cocoa bean bag. Most importantly, all three diagrams highlight the three core requirements of the project, which are a hand-held device, non-invasive operation, and an easy-to-use moisture meter. (b) In-class exercise: Following the case study discussions, this workshop includes a guided in-class exercise in which all teams are provided with a short list of example requirements and are asked to draw

Conference Session

Tech Session 3: Emerging Trends in Engineering Education: AI, Clean Energy, and Curriculum Design

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dayna Mandalyn Cline, United States Military Academy; David Zgonc, United States Military Academy at West Point; William B Vass, United States Military Academy; Michael A. Butkus P.E., United States Military Academy; Matthew Baideme, United States Military Academy; Brett Ryan Krueger, United States Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering & Sustainability Division (ENVIRON)

. 2024, doi: 10.3390/architecture4040046.[26] H. Zhang and R. Zhang, “Generative artificial intelligence (AI) in built environment design and planning – A state-of-the-art review,” Progress in Engineering Science, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 100040, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.pes.2024.100040.[27] L. Sela, R. B. Sowby, E. Salomons, and M. Housh, “Making waves: The potential of generative AI in water utility operations.,” Water Res., vol. 272, p. 122935, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.122935.[28] Y. Wu, M. Xu, and S. Liu, “Generative artificial intelligence: A new engine for advancing environmental science and engineering.,” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 58, no. 40, pp. 17524–17528, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1021

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 10: Learning to Learn - Metacognition and Self-Regulated Strategies

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Flanagan, Clemson University; Grace F Crocker, Clemson University; Michael Joseph Kiernan, Clemson University; Joseph Overlin Chapa, Clemson University; Elizabeth Anne Stephan, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FPD)

what they discovered about the course content and course structureby creating their systems picture.For each section in the paper, students are generally penalized for missing required discussionitems, lacking depth in required discussions (minor penalty), or discussions that do notadequately address the project requirements (major penalty). For assessment purposes, theCategory and Influence sections are tied to course sub-outcome C02.a: Identify strategies usedby successful students through generating a “toolkit” of skills to enhance learning. The FutureWork section is tied to course sub-outcome C01.b: Explain reasoning behind interest inengineering as a major and develop long-terms goals as an engineering professional. TheSummary section is

Conference Session

CANCELLED: Track 3: Technical Session 2: Learning and Adopting Principles of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Justice through the Development of a Sustainability Mindset Among First Year Engineering Students

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Krystal Colón-Rivera, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Nayda G. Santiago P.E., University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Aidsa I. Santiago-Roman, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Christopher Papadopoulos, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Sandra Loree Dika, University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

students expressed thatindicate their development of understanding JEDI principles: (a) Diversity and Inclusion: Integration of DiversePerspectives; (b) Equity, Justice, and Accessibility; and (c) Community-Centric Approach, although the evidencealso suggests that not all students fluently apply these ideas in a problem-solving context. Overall, the resultssuggest that the 1-credit seminar is effective to build essential literacy of JEDI, which will be instrumental in futurework in sustainability engineering and design.1. IntroductionJustice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (JEDI) are recognized as core components of educationin sustainability. JEDI are essential principles of the UN Sustainable Development Goals(SDG’s) (United Nations 2015) and

Conference Session

Track 6: Technical Session 6: WIP: Factors Influencing Faculty Pedagogical Decisions around Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice (DEIJ) in Engineering: A Comparative Case Study

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Avis Carrero, Tufts University

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

asked to participate inthree components: a) an Electronic Survey, (b) an Interview (up to 75 minutes), and (c) anOptional member-checking interview (i.e., upcoming following the data analysis phase).Recruitment activities were dynamic and responsive as the study progressed and included (a)leveraging personal and professional networks, (b) obtaining faculty participant referrals, (c)electronic advertising in various venues (i.e., ASEE division listservs, faculty developmentconsulting groups), and (d) direct outreach to individual departments and faculty members.These activities resulted in a final sample of 36 faculty representing a range of contextual factors,including coming from 15 states, representing 18 institutions, various institutional

Conference Session

Track 4: Technical Session 1: Report of a Survey of Early Career Latinx Engineers: Trends across 3 Years in Perceptions of the Workplace, Social Cognitions, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover Intentions

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Lisa Y Flores, University of Missouri - Columbia; Rachel L Navarro, University of North Dakota; Jinkoo Lee, University of Missouri - Columbia; Bo Hyun Lee, The Ohio State University; Han Na Suh, Georgia State University - Perimeter College; Sarah Lynn Orton P.E., University of Missouri - Columbia; Pat Garriott

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

. 6 Method search Participants Year 1 (2022) Year 2 (2023) Year 3 (2024) N = 518 N = 253 N = 214 A B C Ø College of Engineering Alumni Offices sent emails to engineering graduates from their institution in 2014 or later Ø Snowball sampling Ø

Conference Session

CANCELLED: Track 5: Technical Session 5: Hiring Practices to Build a Diverse Team at Wakr Forest Engineering: Transforming Engineering Education and Broadening Participation in Engineering is Possible!

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Olga Pierrakos, Wake Forest University

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

Divisions (CED, WIED, DEED, MIND, ERM, LEES, etc.), Society of WomenEngineers (SWE), National Society for Black Engineers (NSBE), National Society forProfessional Engineers (NSPE), Professional Engineers societies, etc.Figure 2 shows an actual Wake Forest Engineering faculty ad from fall 2018. The content ofthis faculty ad shows vision, values, and inclusion. The ad has some elements that one would nottypically see in a faculty ad, including (a) departmental values upfront and visibly clear, (b) asection describing our uniqueness and a vision of the kind of engineering program we arelaunching, (c) a section describing a vision of who we want. The ask for the candidates alsodemonstrate inclusion and an invitation to align with the vision and values

Conference Session

Track 5: Technical Session 1: Evaluating the five pillars of a Summer Bridge Program and their influence on participants' intentions to complete an engineering degree

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Lorena Benavides-Riano, Mississippi State University; Mahnas Jean Mohammadi-Aragh, Mississippi State University

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

expectations about career paths and future roles in engineering aftercollege graduation.Purpose of the Study Given the necessity to have effective intervention programs such as Summer Bridge thatpromote URM participation in the STEM field, the study addresses the following researchquestion: 1) Does participation in the summer bridge program significantly increase a) self-efficacy, b) math outcome expectations, c) goal orientation, d) feeling of inclusion, e) knowledge of MSU and the engineering industry, and f) career success expectations among students? The current study hypothesized that participation in the SBP will positively influencestudents' self-efficacy levels, math outcome expectations, goal orientation, feeling of

Conference Session

Track 3: Technical Session 1: Bridging Educational Equity Gaps: A Systematic Review of AI-Driven Tools for Students Living with Disabilities in Engineering and STEM Education

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Kevin Zhongyang Shao, University of Washington; Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Eric Kyeong-Min Cho, University of Washington; Sophia Tang, University of Washington; Hanlin Ma, University of Washington; Sep Makhsous, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

Paper ID #45288Bridging Educational Equity Gaps: A Systematic Review of AI-Driven andNew Technologies for Students Living with Disabilities in STEM EducationKevin Zhongyang Shao, University of Washington Zhongyang (Kevin) Shao is currently a first-year Ph.D. student in Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) at the University of Washington, Seattle (UW). His research focuses on human-computer interaction and STEM education, particularly in developing user-centered, inclusive, and responsible AI technologies to enhance the accessibility and personalize learning for post-secondary STEM students. His current work

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Strategies for Student Support

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Bahnson, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Eric Trevor McChesney, University of Pittsburgh; Allison Godwin, Cornell University; Christian D Schunn, University of Pittsburgh; Linda DeAngelo, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

fit thedata well (Table 3). The coefficientof determination indicated themodel explained a considerablecourse grade variation for BLIstudents. This model identifiedsimilar patterns of significance asthe intervention model withsignificant direct effects between Figure 3. Construct relationships for interventionPSE and belonging, as well as PSE usefulness ratingand course grade (see Table 5, Figure 3). Like the intervention model, no direct or indirect effectslinked usefulness rating to course grade.Table 5. Utility model coefficients.Dependent Independent β B S.E. z p Direct EffectsPSE Useful 0.21 0.15 0.13 1.19 0.235 PSE 0.58

Conference Session

Engineering Technology Division (ETD) Technical Session 5

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen Andrew Wilkerson P.E., York College of Pennsylvania; Yargo Teixeira Gomes de Melo, York College of Pennsylvania; Tamara Schwartz, York College of Pennsylvania; Dean Zeller, York College of Pennsylvania

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology Division (ETD)

adopted technology, where all faculty responders do use the technology as well asthe majority of students. (a) Faculty and panelists usage of AI 28.57% 42.86% 28.57% Daily Weekly Monthly Rarely Never (b) Students usage of AI 2.78% 5.56% 13.89% 27.78% 50.00% Daily Weekly Monthly Rarely NeverFigure 1. Survey response on AI usage by (a) faculty and panelists (b) students.The wide adoption of AI, however, comes without being paired with proper training on how touse AI responsibly. Figure 2 depicts the percentage of the surveyed student

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND) Technical Session 12

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sehba Midhat Hasan, Tufts University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)

prepare thestudents for a STEM world.References[1] L. C. Cançado, R. L. Reisel, and M. D. Walker, Impacts of a Summer Bridge Program inEngineering on Student Retention and Graduation. Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 107, no. 1,pp. 30-40, 2018.[2] B. Louie, D. Knight, and J. Sullivan, “A drop-in tutoring program to support first-year engineering,”in 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 2011, pp. 22.40.1–22.40.14. doi:10.18260/1-2--17322.[3] L. Redd, Institutional barriers affecting the academic and social development ofunderrepresented college students: Perspectives of administrators, University of Pittsburgh ETD,Jan. 30, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/35904/[4] D. Super et al., “Industry

Collection

2025 ASEE -GSW Annual Conference

Authors

Todd W Polk, University of Texas at Dallas; Robert Hart P.E., University of Texas at Dallas

deadline.Closing the Peer Evaluation LoopAfter each peer evaluation, the instructors analyze the ratings to assign individual grades. The ratingscale for all six questions is 1-5, with 5 corresponding to the top option (i.e., best performance). Foreach student, we average the ratings of their teammates for the six categories which gives us an overallpeer evaluation rating. Note that a student’s self-ratings are excluded. The result is an overall ratingof 1-5, with a rating of 3 being average. A rating of 3 equates to 85 points or a B on our scale.In addition, the instructors read all the comments to ensure they are professional and appropriate.Comments are edited as necessary. Once this step is complete, the evaluations are released back tothe students

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 11

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benjamin Edward Chaback, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; David Gray, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Mark Vincent Huerta, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Ernesto Adolfo Cuesta Alvear, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Atlas Vernier, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

& B. McMullin(eds.) Emerging issues in the practice of University Learning and Teaching, Dublin, All Ireland Society for Higher Education (AISHE).Escandell, S., & Chu, T. L. (2023). Implementing relatedness-supportive teaching strategies to promote learning in the college classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 50(4), 441-447.Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?. Educational psychology review, 16, 235-266.Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.Lattuca, L. R., Knight, D., & Bergom, I. (2013). Developing a measure of interdisciplinary competence. International journal of engineering education

Conference Session

Two-Year College Division (TYCD) Technical Session 1: Transfer Pathways

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

eugene leo draine mahmoud, Mt. San Antonio Community College & Purdue University; Anne Victoria Wrobetz, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); N. Bray Bonner, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Tram Dang, Purdue University – West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Joyce B. Main, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PWL) (COE)

Tagged Divisions

Two-Year College Division (TYCD)

. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PWL) (COE) Joyce B. Main is Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education, and a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University. She is Co-Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Engineering Education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 A focus on state-wide community college and technical college engineering transfer programs across California, Colorado, and GeorgiaIntroduction With college costs increasing faster than inflation over the last 20 years, some studentsface

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 6

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohamed Gharib, Texas A&M University; Joshua A Jalomo, Texas A&M University; Gabriel Tijerina, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

report.Lab Activity 4: ToF Sensor Integration The goal of this task is to power your DC motors and servo motors based on the distance reading from your ToF sensor. 1. Restrict your sensor reading range between 0 and 100 cm. If a reading above 100 cm is detected, end the program and stop all motors and servos. 2. At 50 cm: a. Motor 1 is at 0% duty cycle b. Motor 2 is at 0% duty cycle c. Servo 1 is at 90 degrees d. Servo 2 is at 90 degrees 3. As the sensor readings get smaller than 50 cm: a. Motor 1 speeds up going CW b. Motor 2 speeds up going CCW c. At 0 cm, both motors are spinning at their maximum duty cycle for this activity (50%) d. Servo 1 decreases its angle e

Conference Session

Two-Year College Division (TYCD) Technical Session 2: Student Success and Support

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Krupczak Jr, Hope College; David R Brown; Amy B Chan Hilton, University of Southern Indiana

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two-Year College Division (TYCD)

Paper ID #49164Approaches for Efficiently Identifying and Characterizing Student Need Assessmentsin Two-Year CollegesDr. John Krupczak Jr, Hope College Professor of Engineering, Hope College, Holland, Michigan. Program Officer, NSF (2013-2016). Past Chair of the ASEE Technological Literacy Division; Past Chair of the ASEE Liberal Education Division; Senior Fellow CASEE, National Academy of Engineering (2008-2010).David R BrownDr. Amy B Chan Hilton, University of Southern Indiana Amy B. Chan Hilton, Ph.D. is the Director of the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning and a Professor of Engineering at the University of

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Walter C. Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; David B Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Paper ID #46968BOARD # 405: NSF HBCU-UP: STEM Academy for Research and Entrepreneurshipat the University of Arkansas at Pine BluffDr. Walter C. Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Walter Lee is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education and the director for research at the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity (CEED), both at Virginia Tech.Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David Knight is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and also serves as Chief of Strategy in the College of Engineering

Conference Session

GSD 5: Mentorship

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gabriella Coloyan Fleming; David B Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Maura Borrego, University of Texas at Austin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

Michigan’s Center for Engineering Diversity and Outreach, a postdoc in Mechanical Engineering at UT Austin, and the director of and research associate in the Center for Equity in Engineering at UT Austin. Her engineering education research interests include servingness in engineering; assets-based teaching and learning; natural language processing and generative AI as qualitative research methods; and graduate education, faculty hiring and retention, and career pathways.Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David Knight is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and also serves as Chief of Strategy in the College of Engineering and Special Assistant to the

Conference Session

Engineering Libraries Division (ELD) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Seth Vuletich, Colorado School of Mines; Brianna B Buljung, Colorado School of Mines; Adeline Greene, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries Division (ELD)

Paper ID #46039Enabling Successful Transitions to Higher Education for Students with DisabilitiesSeth Vuletich, Colorado School of Mines Seth Vuletich is the Scholarly Communications Librarian the Colorado School of Mines. Seth provides specialized support to graduate students through all stages of the research lifecycle. Prior to entering the field of librarianship, Seth was a professional woodworker and earned a bachelor’s degree in geology from the University of Colorado, Boulder. Seth earned his Master’s in Library and Information Science from the University of Denver in 2021.Brianna B Buljung, Colorado School of

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session - Ethics education methodologies and interventions

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edwin R. Schmeckpeper P.E., Norwich University; Ashley Ater Kranov, Washington State University; Michael B. Kelley P.E., Norwich University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

. Schmeckpeper taught at a land-grant college, the University of Idaho, and worked as an engineer in design offices and at construction sites.Dr. Ashley Ater Kranov, Washington State University Dr. Ashley Ater Kranov is an adjunct associate professor in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Washington State University.Dr. Michael B. Kelley P.E., Norwich University B.S.C.E., 1974, Norwich University M.S.C.E., 1976, (Environmental Engineering), Purdue University P.E., Commonwealth of Virginia, 1979 to present. Ph.D., 1996, (Environmental Engineering), Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Colonel, US Army (Retired) O ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Norwich

Conference Session

Track 5: Technical Session 2: Revisiting Assessment Tools Used to Measure the Impact of Summer Program Interventions on Perceptions and Interest in Engineering Among Underrepresented Pre-College Students – A Work in Progress

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Zeynep Ambarkutuk, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Jesika Monet McDaniel, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; Cynthia Hampton Ph.D., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Kim Lester, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

changes in their short-term and long-term goals. The schedule ofsurveys for UPSILON specifically is included in Appendix B at the end of this work in progresspaper.Considerations Throughout the Evaluation ProcessThe considerations represented in this work in progress were the first time in multiple years thatthe scale, types, and coordination of assessment has been revisited in a more intentional way –especially post-shutdowns of 2020-2022. In revisiting the evaluation of the summer campsseveral key considerations were central to ensuring the effectiveness and accuracy of theassessments. We present the below categories that were essential in exploring: What changes andconsiderations are needed for documentation, data, and collection to capture

Conference Session

CANCELLED: Track 6: Technical Session 1: A Student-Centered, Theory-Informed, Integrated Model to Academic and Career Advising to Educate the Whole Engineer: Transforming Engineering Education and Broadening Participation in Engineering is Possible!

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Olga Pierrakos, Wake Forest University; Melissa C Kenny, Wake Forest University

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

, goals, and student needs. Some ofthe advising models documented in the literature include the following: (a) learning-centeredadvising approach (focused on connecting purpose of education with curriculum and degree),(b) engagement approach (focused on relationship building between student and advisor), (c)developmental advising approach (focused on student development and growth), (d)prescriptive academic advising approach (focused on checklists towards degree completion), (e)proactive advising approach (focused on students initiating advising meetings and advisorstacking those identified as at academic risk), (f) appreciative advising approach (focused oncreating positive interactions to support growth and academic planning), (g) flipped

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Poster Session

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steve Warren Ph.D., Kansas State University; Charles Carlson, Kansas State University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)

number, modelnumber, manufacture date, etc. Refer to Appendices A.1 and A.2 for representative images.Device Accuracy Assessment. Each student performs a CMS50NA accuracy assessment, usinga Masimo MightySat® fingerclip pulse oximeter as a reference. They acquire at least 25 time-aligned measurement pairs (e.g., index and middle fingers) using the two devices. The studentcaptures images of (a) the devices while worn, with active displays, and (b) a wider view of thetesting area. Using Microsoft Excel, the student determines absolute and relative pulse rates andSpO2 errors for all the data pairs. They then calculate various statistical parameters, including anRMS value for absolute error for the overall data set, consistent with the ISO